Greater earless lizard

Last updated

Contents

Greater earless lizard
Reptile tx usa.jpg
Cophosaurus texanus (male)
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Suborder: Iguania
Family: Phrynosomatidae
Genus: Cophosaurus
Troschel, 1852
Species:
C. texanus
Binomial name
Cophosaurus texanus
Troschel, 1852

The greater earless lizard (Cophosaurus texanus) is the only species in the monotypic genus Cophosaurus. It is closely related to the smaller, lesser earless lizards and other species in the genus Holbrookia , and in fact was placed in that genus and referred to Holbrookia texana from 1852 into the 1970s. Earless lizards lack external ear openings, an adaptation to burrowing in the sand, as are the recessed lower jaw and flared upper labial scales. Greater earless lizards are sexually dimorphic, males grow larger and are more colorful than females, exhibiting pink and green colors that are particularly bright in the breeding season. Two bold black bars mark the lateral region of males but are greatly reduced and vague, or occasionally entirely absent in females.

The greater earless lizard is native to the Chihuahua Desert and other arid and semi-arid regions of Southwestern United States and northern Mexico, where they most often occupy moderately open areas of sparse vegetation with rocks, gravel, and sand. The overall color of individual lizards frequently match the colors of the rocks and soils of the local area they inhabit. They will often rely on camouflage and their speed to elude threats and predators before retreating into rock crevices. They are primarily insectivores, preying on wide variety of crickets, grasshoppers, caterpillars, ants, flies, beetles, and bugs. Spiders and small lizards are occasionally eaten as well. Cophosaurus are oviparous. Females lay 1 to 4 clutches of 2 – 9 eggs a year, with hatchlings emerging from June to October, and reaching adult size and sexual maturity in one year.

Etymology

The generic name Cophosaurus, is derived from the Greek words copho (κουφός) meaning deaf, and saurus meaning lizard, in reference to the absents of external ear openings in the species. The trivial name, or specific epithet texanus, is a toponym in reference to the state of Texas where the specimens used in the original description were collected. [2] The subspecies names are both Latin, reticulatus meaning reticulated or a net-like pattern, [3] : 1586 p.  and scitulus meaning handsome or pretty. [3] : 1645 p. 

Taxonomy

Illustration of Cophosaurus texanus that was published in Troschel's original description of the species dated 1850. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte (1850) (20336535231).jpg
Illustration of Cophosaurus texanus that was published in Troschel's original description of the species dated 1850.

Within the family Phrynosomatidae, Cophosaurus is most closely related to Zebra-Tailed Lizards ( Callisaurus ), Lesser Earless Lizards ( Holbrookia ), and Fringe-Toed Lizards ( Uma ), collectively forming the Tribe Callisaurini, commonly referred to as sand lizards. [4] [5] The genus Cophosaurus is monotypic, meaning Cophosaurus texanus is the only species in the genus. Franz Hermann Troschel described the genus Cophosaurus as well as the species C. texanus in his paper dated 1850, but not published until 1852. [6] Later that same year the species was transferred to the genus Holbrookia in a review by Spencer Fullerton Baird and Charles Frédéric Girard, and subsequent literature used the name Holbrookia texana for well over a century. [7] Troschlel's description was based on two specimens, cotypes or syntypes, both lost in the Second World War. In 1951 James A. Peters published a review of the species recognizing three subspecies and designating a neotype for C. t. texanus, although still placing them in the genus Holbrookia. [8] : 5 p.  In a 1958 Ph. D. dissertation reviewing the genus Holbrookia, herpetologist Ralph W. Axtell excluded Holbrookia texana with little comment, [9] and this was noted by Robert F. Clarke in his 1965 Ph. D. dissertation who placed it back in the original genus Cophosaurus. [10] : 5 p.  Both combinations, Cophosaurus texanus and Holbrookia texana, were used by various authors in the 1970s, but despite arguments for the placement of the species in Holbrookia, [11] [12] Cophosaurus was in predominant use by the 1980s and later allozymes analysis supported the recognition of the genus. [4]

Three subspecies are currently recognized (2022), with standardized English names. [13]

Description

The greater earless lizard is a medium sized lizard (relative to other species in its range) and the largest of the earless lizards. A range of sizes have been reported by various authors: Texas greater earless lizard (C. t. texanus), males 8.3 – 18.1 cm. [3.25 – 7.1 in.], females 7 – 14.3 cm. [2.75 – 5.6 in.]; Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (C. t. scitulus), males 9 – 18.4 cm. [3.5 – 7.25 in.], females 6.7 – 13.5 cm. [2.6 – 5.3 in.] in total lengths are representative of the species. [16]

Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (C. t. scitulus), male, Dona Ana County, New Mexico (19 Sept 2015) Cophosaurus texanus - Flickr - aspidoscelis (2) (cropped).jpg
Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (C. t. scitulus), male, Doña Ana County, New Mexico (19 Sept 2015)

Greater earless lizards do not have external ear openings. The scales on the body are small and granular, with the dorsal scales slightly smaller than the ventral scales. Their legs, particularly the hind legs, are relatively long. The tail is slightly flattened and longer than head and body combined. The underside of the tail is white with 5 to 9 (usually 6 or 7) bold, contrasting black bands (excluding individuals with regenerated tails). The base color can be various shades of grays, browns, tans, or reddish brown and generally close to the prevailing colors of the local substrate. Cophosaurus texanus is a sexually dimorphic species, in addition to size differences, males and females differ in some aspects of colors and markings. Most noticeable in males are a pair of black bands located on the posterior third on the sides of the body, rising from two blue patches on the margins of the belly up sides and arching forward and ending before meeting on the back. The body anterior to the black bands is suffused with some shade of pink, orange, or red, and the body posterior to the black bands tented green, aqua-green, or lime-green. The colors are most prominent in the Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (C. t. scitulus) and are greatly enhanced and most noticeable in the breeding season in all subspecies. In parts of their range they are colloquially referred to as "the lizard with the pink shirt and green pants." [16] : 223 p.  In contrast, females either lack the black lateral bands entirely or they are very faint and indistinct. Females and young often exhibit a lateral white or near white stripe running between the forelimbs and hind limbs and on the back of the legs. [8] [17] [18]

The subspecies were diagnosed in the original description with the following characters. Cophosaurus t. texana: typically, 80–86%, have 79 ventral scales or less from collar (last gular fold) to anus, 40 or more scales in head length, and 27 or less total femoral pores. Cophosaurus t. scitula: 80–84% have 80 or more ventral scales, 39 or less head scales, 28 or more femoral pores. Cophosaurus t. reticulata: 85–100% have 82 ventral scales, 36 or less head scales, less than 31 femoral pores, and the black lateral bars are faint and do not extend above the lateral fold in males. [8] : 5, 8, & 11 pp. 

Distribution

Distribution of the greater earless lizard: Cophosaurus texanus texanus = light green; C. t. scitulus = mid green; C. t. reticulatus = dark greem; hatching = integration zones Distribution of Cophosaurus texanus II.jpg
Distribution of the greater earless lizard: Cophosaurus texanus texanus = light green; C. t. scitulus = mid green; C. t. reticulatus = dark greem; hatching = integration zones

The Greater earless lizard occurs in southwestern United States (Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas) and northern Mexico (Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango, Nuevo Leon, San Luis Potosi, Sonora, Tamaulipas, and Zacatecas). [8] : 7 p.  [17] : 146 p.  [2] Elevations ranging from 127 to 2100 meters have been reported. [19] [20]

The Texas greater earless lizard (C. t. texanus) occurs in the Edwards Plateau region of central Texas and northward to the state border and southeastern areas of the Texas panhandle. [21] It ranges southward into the Tamaulipan mezquital ecoregion, along the Rio Grande into northeast Coahuila and north-central Nuevo León, Mexico. [2] [22] In south-central Tamaulipas its occurrence becomes increasingly spotty and localized with records just across southern state line in eastern San Luis Potosí. [19] [23] [24] Several accounts have commented on the problematic and poorly defined zone of integration between the subspecies C. t. texanus and C. t. scitulu. [17] : 149 p.  [21] : 1 & 3–4 p.  [25] : 142 p. 

The Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (C. t. scitulus) occurs throughout much of the Chihuahua Desert, including much of the Trans-Pecos region of west Texas, [21] the southern third of New Mexico (following the Pecos and Rio Grande river basins northward), [25] into southeast Arizona east of the Sonora Desert, and following a zone of semi-arid habitat around the northeast margins of the Sonora Desert almost to the California border. [26] In Mexico it ranges into northeast Chihuahua, much of Coahuila, [2] northeast Durango, extreme northeast Zacatecas, extreme southern Nuevo León, northern San Luis Potosí, and extreme southwest Tamaulipas. It is absent from the higher elevations in the Sierra Madre Oriental but it does range deep into the canyons and valleys on both the eastern and western versants of the mountain range. [22] [27] [24] [19]

The Sonoran greater earless lizard (C. t. reticulatus) is endemic to northeastern Sonora, Mexico, between 470 – 1300 meters, where as recently as 2016 it was reportedly known from only eight localities. [28]

Ecology and natural history

Reproduction

Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (Cophosaurus t. scitulus), female, municipality of General Cepeda, Coahuila, Mexico (27 March 2013) Rincon Colorado, General Cepeda, Coahuila - panoramio (50) (cropped).jpg
Chihuahuan greater earless lizard (Cophosaurus t. scitulus), female, municipality of General Cepeda, Coahuila, Mexico (27 March 2013)

The longevity of the greater earless lizard is typically 3 years, but records of individuals surviving five reproductive seasons in the wild have been documented. [25] : 144 p.  Both males and females reach adult size in a year, attaining maturity and mating before their second winter. Mating occurs from April to August, peeking in late April to early July. Gravid females often exhibit pink, orange, or yellow colors on their throats and sides. In one study gravid females were only found in May and June. Multiple clutches, up to four a year, are scattered over a wide area, with clutch size ranging from 2 to 9 eggs, average 3 to 5. Older females produce larger clutches than young females. One study reported finding single eggs buried in the sand on three occasions but never locating a clutch. [29] The incubation period is about 50 days. The hatchlings emerge June to October with reports of sizes varying from 20–25 mm. to 26–31 mm. snout–vent length. [25] : 143–144 p.  [29] [30] [31] [32] [33]

Diet

The greater earless lizard is predominantly an insectivore and a generalist. A study in Mohave County, Arizona found insects comprised 85% of the diet, including 18.2% Orthoptera (crickets, grasshoppers, locusts), 15.8% Hymenoptera (ants, bees, sawflies, wasps), and 10.1% Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), 9.2% Diptera (flies), 9.2% Coleoptera (beetles), and 8.4% Hemiptera (true bugs). Spiders made up 7.9% of the diet and Cophosaurus were found to occasionally feed on small lizards, particularly ornate tree lizards ( Urosaurus ornatus ), in the late summer and early spring when hatchling emerged and were abundant. [32] : 180–181 p.  Another study conducted in the Mapimí Biosphere Reserve in Durango, Mexico, found the most frequent prey items were spiders, Hymenoptera, Lepidopteran (caterpillars) adult and nymph Orthoptera, beetles, and true bugs. [34] Less frequent prey identified in these studies included Neuroptera (lacewings, mantidflies, antlions), mites, pseudoscorpions, termites, Homoptera, adult Lepidoptera, and Odonata (dragonflies, damselflies) The Arizona study found that plants made up 5.5% of the diet, while the Durango study found only two cases of plant ingestion and interpret them as accidental intake. The most common, or highest percentage of prey items (e.g. Hymenoptera, caterpillars, etc.) in the diet were found to change annually in the Durango study. [32] [34]

Cophosaurus use a sit-and-wait foraging strategy, often situating themselves on a high vantage point such as a rock, bolder, or fallen limb, in a relatively open space and dashing out to take passing insects. They have been observed leaping into the air or at low-hanging vegetation to catch their prey. [17] In one study, months with rain were significantly correlated with an increase of arthropods in the environment and in the dietary intake of the lizards. There was not a significant deference in the diet of males and females. Competition for food between adults and juveniles, as well as other species of sympatric lizards is at least partially alleviated by resource partitioning, determined by differences in body size and jaw length. [34] [35]

Habitat

Big Bend National Park in the Chihuahuan Desert, where greater earless lizards tend to occupy gulches, arroyos, and rocky areas of sparse vegetation. Big Bend Chihuahuan Desert.jpg
Big Bend National Park in the Chihuahuan Desert, where greater earless lizards tend to occupy gulches, arroyos, and rocky areas of sparse vegetation.

The greater earless lizard native to the arid environment of the Chihuahua Desert, extending into western areas of the Tamaulipan mezquital, and the northeastern margins of the Meseta Central matorral, as well as the semi-arid Edwards Plateau and Central Great Plains in Texas, and the Arizona transition zone (between the Sonoran Desert and Arizona Mountains forests) in the west.

Within these ecoregions it typically occupies open scrubland and areas of sparse vegetation, with rocks and boulder. [32] [34] Limestone ledges and outcrops near streams with boulders and crevices, and dry gulches, arroyos, and canyons with alluvium deposits of silt, sand, gravel, and rocks are often preferred, but it is not strictly limited to these areas. [36] Gentle to moderate slopes of limestone and gravel and hills of granite and igneous rock are also habitat for the lizard. [37] Plants identified in association with greater earless lizards include honey mesquite ( Prosopis glandulosa ), creosote bush ( Larrea tridentata ), ocotillo ( Fouquieria splendens ), sotol ( Dasylirion ), lechuguilla ( Agave lecheguilla ), prickly pear cactus ( Opuntia ), leatherstem ( Jatropha dioica ), and candelilla ( Euphorbia antisyphilitica ). [34] [37]

The color of an individual lizard often bears a striking correlation to the prevailing colors of the rocks and substrates where it lives: e.g. specimens from Llano County, Texas have been noted for their rusty brown color similar to the red granite characteristic of much of the Llano Uplift. [36] Cophosaurus can be locally abundant and among the most common species of herpetofauna in some areas, and yet absent from seemingly appropriate habitat other areas. [17] [37]

Behavior

Greater earless lizards are diurnal, with most populations exhibiting a bimodal daily activity pattern, peeking late in the morning, followed by a period of reduced activity in the afternoon heat, and a second activity period in the late afternoon. They have a high optimum temperature range, typical active body is 37–41°C (98.6–105.8°F). [17] [38] At night, Cophosaurus will often burrow in loose sand as deep as 15.3 cm. (6 in.) or in areas without sand, they may partially bury in loose gravel or shale, or sleep on the surface. [39] Females have been found communally buried under shale on cold winter days. [40] [41]

They are predominantly ground-dwelling lizards that often seek a high perch, such as a protruding rock, to survey their area for passing prey and approaching predators. They are reluctant to retreat into crevices or borrows to evade predators, but instead will run from one rock to another with great speed, or rapidly dash a few yards only to make an abrupt stop and then freeze, at which point their remarkable camouflage seems to make them disappear. [42] Cophosaurus are known to engage in bipedal locomotion (running on two feet) during short burst of speed. [17]

Males, females, and even hatchlings only five minutes old exhibit territorial displays including head bobbing, pushups, lateral body compression. [25] Another conspicuous behavior is the habit of lifting its tail and curling it over its back while running and waving the striking black and white banded tail in the air, diverting attention away from the head and body to the relatively expendable tail. [17] The practice of curling the tail over the body while of running also serves a functional purpose as a counter-balance, shifting the center of gravity closer to the force exerted by the lizard's rear legs. A 32% decrease in running speed was reported for lizards that had lost their tails. [43]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phrynosomatidae</span> Family of lizards

The Phrynosomatidae are a diverse family of lizards, sometimes classified as a subfamily (Phrynosomatinae), found from Panama to the extreme south of Canada. Many members of the group are adapted to life in hot, sandy deserts, although the spiny lizards prefer rocky deserts or even relatively moist forest edges, and the short-horned lizard lives in prairie or sagebrush environments. The group includes both egg-laying and viviparous species, with the latter being more common in species living at high elevations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earless lizard</span> Group of lizards

Earless lizards are two genera of small lizards native to the semiarid and grassland habitats of the Southwestern United States and Mexico. The genus Cophosaurus and the genus Holbrookia are both characterized by having no external ear openings, presumably to prevent sand from entering their bodies as they dig.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spiny lizard</span> Genus of lizards

Spiny lizards is a common name for the genus Sceloporus in the family Phrynosomatidae. The genus is endemic to North America, with various species ranging from New York, to Washington, and one occurring as far south as northern Panama. The greatest diversity is found in Mexico. This genus includes some of the most commonly seen lizards in the United States. Other common names for lizards in this genus include fence lizards, scaly lizards, bunchgrass lizards, and swifts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mexican blind lizard</span> Species of lizard

The Mexican blind lizard is a species of legless lizard in the family Dibamidae, and the only species in the genus Anelytropsis. It is endemic to Mexico. They look like Amphisbaenia, but are in fact, only distantly related.

<i>Holbrookia</i> Genus of lizards

Holbrookia is a genus of earless lizards, known commonly as the lesser earless lizards, in the family Phrynosomatidae. The genus contains six recognized species, which are found throughout the Southwestern and Central United States and northern Mexico. They are characterized by having no external ear openings, presumably to prevent soil from entering their bodies when they are digging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Texas horned lizard</span> Species of lizard

The Texas horned lizard is one of about 21 North American species of spikey-bodied reptiles called horned lizards, all belonging the genus Phrynosoma. It occurs in south-central regions of the US and northeastern Mexico, as well as several isolated introduced records and populations from Southern United States. Though some populations are stable, severe population declines have occurred in many areas of Texas and Oklahoma. The Texas spiny lizard may be confused for a Texas horned lizard due to its appearance and overlapping habitat.

<i>Sceloporus magister</i> Species of lizard

Sceloporus magister, also known as the desert spiny lizard, is a lizard species of the family Phrynosomatidae, native to the Chihuahuan Desert and Sonoran Desert of North America.

<i>Sceloporus poinsettii</i> Species of lizard

Sceloporus poinsettii, the crevice spiny lizard, is a species of small, phrynosomatid lizard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mediterranean house gecko</span> Species of reptile

The Mediterranean house gecko is a species of house gecko native to the Mediterranean region, from which it has spread to many parts of the world including parts of East Africa, South America, the Caribbean, and the Southern and Southeastern United States. It is commonly referred to as the Turkish gecko as represented in its Latin name and also as the moon lizard because it tends to emerge in the evening.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aridoamerica</span> Ecological region of North America

Aridoamerica denotes an ecological region spanning Northern Mexico and the Southwestern United States, defined by the presence of the culturally significant staple foodstuff Phaseolus acutifolius, a drought-resistant bean. Its dry, arid climate and geography stand in contrast to the verdant Mesoamerica of present-day central Mexico into Central America to the south and east, and the higher, milder "island" of Oasisamerica to the north. Aridoamerica overlaps with both.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern sheep frog</span> Species of amphibian

The northern sheep frog is native to Central America, Mexico, and extreme south Texas, United States. It occurs in the lowlands from Sonora, Mexico, to northern Costa Rica on the Pacific coast, and south Texas to Honduras on the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean coasts. The sheep frog inhabits semiarid thornscrub, savannas, pasturelands, and open woodlands, as well as more humid, moist forest in the canyons, basins, foothills, and lower elevations of mountains slopes. It is a fossorial, burrowing frog that is seldom seen on the surface except at night after heavy rains when they emerge to breed. The sheep frog gets its name from its distinctive call that resembles a sheep's bleat. It is a diet specialist primarily feeding on termites and ants.

<i>Holbrookia maculata</i> Species of lizard

Holbrookia maculata, commonly known as the lesser earless lizard, is a species of lizard in the family Phrynosomatidae. The species is native to the southwestern and central United States and northern Mexico. There are eight recognized subspecies.

<i>Holbrookia propinqua</i> Species of lizard

Holbrookia propinqua, commonly known as the keeled earless lizard, is a species of phrynosomatid lizard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Little striped whiptail</span> Species of lizard

The little striped whiptail is a species of lizard found in the southwestern United States and in northern Mexico. A significant amount of research was done on the species during the mid-1990s, with several new subspecies being added, many of which some sources consider to be distinct enough to warrant full species status, and the research is ongoing. It is called little to distinguish it from many other species known as striped whiptails and to indicate that it is the smallest of those species.

Holbrookia subcaudalis, commonly known as the southern spot-tailed earless lizard, is a species of lizard in the genus Holbrookia. It was previously considered a subspecies of Holbrookia lacerata.

Holbrookia maculata perspicua, commonly known as the eastern earless lizard and the prairie earless lizard, is a subspecies of lizard in the family Phrynosomatidae. H. m. perspicua is a subspecies of the lesser earless lizard. The subspecies is native to the prairies of the central United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tamaulipan mezquital</span> Xeric shrublands ecoregion in Mexico and the United States

The Tamaulipan mezquital is a deserts and xeric shrublands ecoregion in the Southern United States and northeastern Mexico. It covers an area of 141,500 km2 (54,600 sq mi), encompassing a portion of the Gulf Coastal Plain in southern Texas, northern Tamaulipas, northeastern Coahuila, and part of Nuevo León.

<i>Ctenosaura acanthura</i> Species of reptile in Mexico

Ctenosaura acanthura, is a species of iguanid lizard found in eastern Mexico and extreme western Guatemala. The standardized English name is the Mexican spiny-tailed iguana. Confusingly however, an earlier edition of standardized names for Mexican herpetofauna called Ctenosaura acanthura the northeastern spinytailed iguana and applied the name Mexican spinytailed iguana to Ctenosaura pectinata, which was called the western spiny-tailed iguana in the second edition. It has also been referred to as the Veracruz spiny-tailed iguana and Gulf Coast spiny-tailed iguana. It is an egg laying species that is mostly herbivorous and a moderately large lizard commonly growing over one meter in total length.

<i>Holbrookia elegans</i> Species of lizard in North America

Holbrookia elegans, the elegant earless lizard, is a species of lizard native to the United States and Mexico.

References

  1. ↑ "Cophosaurus texanus (Greater Earless Lizard)". Iucnredlist.org. Retrieved 2012-01-26.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Lemos Espinal, Julio A., Hobart M. Smith, James R. Dixon, and Alexander Cruz. 2015. Amphibians and Reptiles of Sonora, Chihuahua, and Coahuila, Mexico, Vol. I & II. CONABIO, Mexico D. F. 668 pp. (Vol. II pages 202-203 & 595) ISBN   978-607-8328-27-7
  3. 1 2 Lewis, Charlton Thomas 1879. A Latin Dictionary: Founded on Andrew's Edition of Freund's Latin Dictionary, revised, enlarged, and in great part rewritten by Charlton Thomas Lewis, Ph. D. Oxford University Press. Oxford. xiv, 2019 pp. 1993 edition ISBN   0-19-864201-6
  4. 1 2 de Queiroz, Kevin. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships and rates of allozyme evolution among the lineages of sceloporine sand lizards . Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 45: 333-362.
  5. ↑ Uetz, Peter, Paul Freed, R. Aguilar, and J. Hošek (editors). 2022. The Reptile Database, http://www.reptile-database.org. Cophosaurus texanus TROSCHEL, 1852 (accessed June 5, 2022)
  6. 1 2 Troschel, F. H. 1852. Cophosaurus texanus, neue Eidechsengattung aus Texas. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 16 (1): 388-394 [1850].
  7. ↑ Baird, Spencer F. and Charles F. Girard. 1852. Characteristics of some new reptiles in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution, part 2. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 6: 125-129. (page 125)
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Peters, James A. 1951. Studies on the lizard Holbrookia texana (Troschel) with descriptions of two new subspecies . Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, (537): 1-20.
  9. ↑ Axtell, Ralph W.1958. A monographic revision of the iguanid genus Holbrookia. Ph. D. dissertation. Univ. Texas, viii + 222 pp.
  10. ↑ Clarke, Robert F. 1965. An ethological study of the iguanid lizard genera Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, and Holbrookia. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D. Dissertation,. Emporia Slate Research Studies, 13: 1-66. (page 5
  11. ↑ Guttman, S. I. 1970. An electrophoretic study of the hemoglobins of the sand lizards, Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, Holbrookia, and Uma. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 34(3): 569-574.
  12. ↑ Cox, Douglas C. & Wilmer W. Tanner. 1977. Ostelolgy and Myology of the Head and Neck Regions of Callisaurus, Cophosaurus, Holbrookia, and Uma (Reptilia: Iguanidae). Great Basin Naturalist 37: 35-56.
  13. ↑ Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles: Checklist of the Standard English Names of Amphibians & Reptiles. (accessed June 3, 2022)
  14. 1 2 3 Liner, E. A. and G. Casas-Andreu. 2008. Standard Spanish, English and scientific names of the amphibians and reptiles of Mexico. Society for the Study Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular 38: i-iv, 1-162. (page 57) ISBN   978-0-916984-75-5
  15. 1 2 Crother, B. I. (ed.). 2017. 'Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43, 1–102 pp. [see page 43-44] ISBN   978-1-946681-00-3
  16. 1 2 Conant, Roger and Joseph T. Collins. 1998. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern and Central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company. New York, N. Y. xviii, 616 pp. (pages 222–223) ISBN   0-395-90-452-8
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Howland, Jeffrey M. 2009. Greater Earless Lizard Cophosaurus texanus, Troschlel, 1852. pages 146-149 IN Lawrence L. C. Jones and Robert E. Lovich (editors). Lizards of the American Southwest, A Photographic Field Guide. Rio Nuevo Publishers. Tucson, Arizona. 567 pp. ISBN   1-933855-35-5
  18. ↑ Stebbins, Robert C. and Samuel M. McGinnis. 2018. Peterson Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publidhing Co. New York, N.Y. xi, 560 pp. (pages 276-277) ISBN   9781328715500
  19. 1 2 3 Farr, William L., David Lazcano, and Paablo A. Lavin-Murcio. 2013. New Distributional Records for Amphibians and Reptiles from the State of Tamaulipas, Mexico III. Herpetological Review 44(4): 631-645. (pages 634-635)
  20. ↑ Thomason, Libby. 2018. Cophosaurus texanus, Greater Earless Lizard. Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. (accessed 22 June 2022)
  21. 1 2 3 Axtell, Ralph W. 1991. Interpretive Atlas of Texas Lizards, No. 10, Cophosaurus texanus. Published by Ralph W. Axtell, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois. 1-41 pp.
  22. 1 2 Lemos Espinal, Julio A., Geoffrey R. Smith, and Alexander Cruz. 2018. Amphibians and Reptiles of Nuevo León. Eco Herpetological Publishing and Distribution. Rodeo, New Mexico. x, 370 pp. (pages 93-94 & 339) ISBN   978-1-938850-25-7
  23. ↑ Martin, Paul S. 1958. A Biogeography of Reptiles and Amphibians in the Gomez Farias Region, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, 101: 1-102. (page 58)
  24. 1 2 Lemos Espinal, Julio A. and James R. Dixon. 2013. Amphibians and Reptiles of San Luis Potosí. Eagle Mountain Publishing, LC. Eagle Mountain, Utah. i-xii, 1-300 pp. (pages 117-118, & 287) ISBN   978-0-9720154-7-9
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 Degenhardt, William G., Charles W. Painter, and Andrew H. Price. 1996. Amphibians and Reptiles of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. xix, 431 pp. (pages 141-144) ISBN   0-8263-1695-6
  26. ↑ Brennan, Thomas C. and Andrew T. Holycross. 2006. A Field Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles in Arizona. Arizona Game and Fish Department. Phoenix, Arizona. v, 150 pp. (page 62) ISBN   0-917563-53-0
  27. ↑ Lemos Espinal, Julio A., Geoffrey R. Smith, and Rosaura Valdez Laresz. 2019. Amphibians and Reptiles of Durango, Mexico. Eco Herpetological Publishing and Distribution. Rodeo, New Mexico. xii, 416 pp. (pages 115-116 & 391) ISBN   978-1-938850-27-1
  28. ↑ Rorabaugh, J. C. and Julio Lemos-Espinal. 2016. A Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Sonora, Mexico. ECO Herpetological Publishing and Distribution. Rodeo, New Mexico. 688 pp. (pages 298-300) ISBN   978-1-938850-50-9
  29. 1 2 Johnson, Clifford 1960. Reproductive cycle in females of the greater earless lizard, Holbrookia texana. Copeia, 1960(4): 297-300.
  30. ↑ Ballinger, Royce E., Earl D. Tyler, and Donald W. Tinkle. 1972. Reproductive ecology of a west Texas population of the greater earless lizard, Cophosaurus texanus. The American Midland Naturalist, 88/2: 419-428.
  31. ↑ Schrank, Gordon D., and Royce E. Ballinger. 1973. Male reproductive cycles in two species of lizards (Cophosaurus texanus and Cnemidophorus gularis). Herpetologica, 29(3): 289-293.
  32. 1 2 3 4 Smith, Donald D., Philip A. Medica, and Sherburn R. Sanborn. 1987. Ecological comparison of sympatric populations of sand lizards (Cophosaurus texanus and Callisaurus draconoides). Great Basin Naturalist, 47(2): 175-185.
  33. ↑ Sugg, Derrick W., Lee A. Fitzgerald, and Howard L. Snell. 1995. Growth rate, timing of reproduction, and size dimorphism in the southwestern earless lizard (Cophosaurus texanus scitulus). The Southwestern Naturalist, 40(2): 193-202.
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 Maury, Ma Eugenia. 1995. Diet Composition of the Greater Earless Lizard (Cophosaurus texanus) in central Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Herpetology, 29(2): 266-272.
  35. ↑ Hardy, S., W. Lutterschmidt, M. Fuller, P. Gier, R. Durtsche, R. Bradley, K. Meier. 1997. Ontogenetic variation in the autecology of the greater earless lizard, Cophosaurus texanus. Ecography, 20(4): 336-346.
  36. 1 2 Cagle, Fred R. 1950. Notes on Holbrookia texana in Texas. Copeia. 1950(3): 230.
  37. 1 2 3 Axtell, Ralph W. 1959. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Black Gap Wildlife Management Area, Brewster County, Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist 4(2): 88–109.
  38. ↑ Bashey, Farrah and Arthur E. Dunham. 1997. Elevational Variation in the Thermal Constraints on and Microhabitat Preferences of the Greater Earless Lizard, Cophosaurus texanus. Copeia, 1997(4): 725-737
  39. ↑ Vermersch, Thomas G. 1992. Lizards and Turtles of South-Central Texas. Eakin Press. Austin, Texas. xiv, 170 pp. (pages 27–30) ISBN   0-89015-842-8
  40. ↑ Ramsey, L. W. 1948. Hibernation of Holbrookia texana. Herpetologica, 4 (6): 223.
  41. ↑ Ramsey, L. W. 1949. Hibernation, and the Effect of a Flood on Holbrookia texana. Herpetologica, 5(6): 125-126.
  42. ↑ Garrett, Judith M. and David G. Barker. 1987. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Texas. Texas Monthly Press. Austin, Texas. xi, 225 pp. (pages 137–139) ISBN   0-87719-068-2
  43. ↑ Punzo, Fred. 1982. Tail Autonomy and Running Speed in the Lizards Cophosaurus texanus and Uma notata. Journal of Herpetology, 16(3): 329-331.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.