Internet censorship in South Korea

Last updated

Internet censorship in South Korea is prevalent, and contains some unique elements such as the blocking of pro-North Korea websites, and to a lesser extent, Japanese websites, which led to it being categorized as "pervasive" in the conflict/security area by OpenNet Initiative. South Korea is also one of the few developed countries where pornography is largely illegal, with the exception of social media websites which are a common source of legal pornography in the country. [1] Any and all material deemed "harmful" or subversive by the state is censored. The country also has a "cyber defamation law", which allow the police to crack down on comments deemed "hateful" without any reports from victims, with citizens being sentenced for such offenses. [2]

Contents

From 1995 to 2002, the government of South Korea passed the Telecommunications Business Act (TBA), the first internet censorship law in the world. [3] Passing of the act led to the establishment of the Internet Communications Ethics Committee (ICEC), which would monitor the Internet and make recommendations for content to be removed. The ICEC pursued criminal prosecutions of those who made unlawful statements and blocked several foreign websites. In the first eight months of 1996, the ICEC took down roughly 220,000 messages on Internet sites. [3]

From 2002 to 2008, the government passed a revision of the TBA legislation. [4] This allowed the ICEC to engage in more sophisticated internet policing and other bureaucratic entities to monitor the Internet for illegal speech or take down websites that violated the laws. During this time, there was political drive to increase extensive internet censorship, in part as a response to cases of suicide associated with online rumors. In 2007, over 200,000 incidents of cyberbullying were reported. [5]

In 2008, the election of President Lee Myung-bak was followed by the inauguration of major increases in broadcast censorship. The South Korean government passed a law that created a new agency called the Korea Communications Standards Commission (KCSC) to replace the ICEC, becoming the new South Korean Internet regulation and censorship body. [5] The first major change by the Lee Myung-bak government was to require websites with over 100,000 daily visitors to make their users register their real name and social security numbers. [5] A second change made by the government was to allow KCSC to suspend or delete any web posting or articles for 30 days as soon as a complaint is filed. The reason for the new law was to combat cyberbullying in South Korea. Every week, portions of the South Korean web are taken down by the KCSC. In 2013, around 23,000 South Korean webpages were deleted and another 63,000 blocked by the KCSC. [6]

South Korea's government maintains a broad-ranging approach toward the regulation of specific online content and imposes a substantial level of censorship on election-related discourse and on many websites that the government deems subversive or socially harmful. [7] Such policies are particularly pronounced with regard to anonymity on the Internet. The OpenNet Initiative classifies Internet censorship in South Korea as pervasive in the conflict/security area, as selective in the social area, with fewer evidence of filtering in the political and Internet tools areas. [7] In 2011 South Korea was included on Reporters Without Borders list of countries Under Surveillance. [8] This designation persisted in 2012, shared with Russia and Egypt among other countries. [9] Freedom House has also reported that online harassment, particularly newer, digitally mediated forms of violence against women has continued.[ citation needed ]

In 2019, the South Korean government announced that it would use SNI snooping to censor HTTPS websites. [10] This was met with strong opposition, with more than 230,000 South Korean citizens signing a petition to protest the measure, but the opposition was disregarded by the government. [11] The South Korean government defended its decision by stating that the Korea Communications Standards Commission was an independent commission, a claim which turned out to be false, as most members of the commission were appointed by the president of the country. [12]

Relevant laws

During the military dictatorships of Park Chung-hee and Chun Doo-hwan (1961-1987), anti-government speech was frequently suppressed with reference to the National Security Act (NSA, 1948) and the Basic Press Law (1980). Although the Basic Press Law was abolished in 1987, the NSA remains in effect. [13] The government has used other "dictatorship-era" laws in order to prosecute critics in contemporary contexts; for example a law against the spreading of "false rumors" was used to charge a teenage protester during the 2008 US beef protest in South Korea. [9]

According to the Telecommunication Business Law, three government agencies in South Korea have responsibility for Internet surveillance and censorship: the Broadcasting Regulation Committee, the Korea Media Rating Board, and the Korea Internet Safety Commission (KISCOM, 2005). KISCOM censors the Internet through orders to internet service providers to block access to "subversive communication", "materials harmful to minors", "cyber defamation", "sexual violence", "cyber stalking", and "pornography and nudity". [13] Regulators have blocked or removed 15,000 Internet posts in 2008, and over 53,000 in 2011. [9]

In April 2020, the national assembly passed a bill to handle the culprits of digital sex crimes. According to the bill, those who purchase, sell or watch media graphics of non-consensual sexual activity will be jailed for up to 3 years or fined up to 3 million Won (US$2,600). [14]

Political censorship

Freedom to criticize government leaders, policies, and the military is limited to the extent that it "endangers national security" or is considered by censors to be "cyber defamation". [13] The government has cited "character assassinations and suicides caused by excessive insults, [and] the spreading of false rumors and defamation" to justify its censorship. [9]

In May 2002, KISCOM shut down the anti-conscription website non-serviam on the grounds that it "denied the legitimacy" of the South Korean military. [13] The Navy of South Korea accused an activist of criminal libel when he criticized plans to build a controversial naval base in the country. [9]

The government has deleted the Twitter account of a user who cursed the president, and a judge who wrote critically about the President's Internet censorship policies was fired. [9] In 2010, the Prime Minister's Office authorized surveillance on a civilian who satirized President Lee Myung-bak. [9]

In 2007, numerous bloggers were censored and their posts deleted by police for expressing criticism of, or even support for, presidential candidates. This even led to some bloggers being arrested by the police. [15] Subsequently, in 2008, just before a new presidential election, new legislation that required all major Internet portal sites to require identity verification of their users was put into effect. This applies to all users who add any publicly viewable content. For example, to post a comment on a news article, a user registration and citizen identity number verification is required. For foreigners who do not have such numbers, a copy of passport must be faxed and verified. Although this law was initially met with public outcry, as of 2008, most of the major portals, including Daum, Naver, Nate, and Yahoo Korea, enforce such verification before the user can post any material that is publicly viewable. [16] YouTube refused to conform to the law, instead opting to disable the commenting feature on its Korean site. [17]

Discussion about North Korea

South Korea has banned at least 65 sites considered sympathetic to North Korea through the use of IP blocking. [18] [19] Most North Korean websites are hosted overseas in the United States, Japan and China. Critics say that the only practical way of blocking a webpage is by denying its IP address, and since many of the North Korean sites are hosted on large servers together with hundreds of other sites, the number of real blocked pages increases significantly. Estimates are that over 3,000 additional webpages are rendered inaccessible.[ citation needed ]

In September 2004, North Korea launched the website of Kim Il-sung Open University  [ ko ], Our Nation School. Three days later, Internet providers in South Korea were ordered by the National Police Agency, National Intelligence Service (NIS) and the Ministry of Information and Communication (MIC) to block connections to the site, as well as more than 30 others, including Minjok Tongshin, Choson Sinbo, Chosun Music, North Korea Info Bank, DPRK Stamp and Uriminzokkiri.[ citation needed ]

In September 2007, Democratic Labor Party activist Kim Kang-pil was sentenced to one year in prison for discussing North Korea on the party's website. [13]

In 2008, five South Koreans were arrested for distributing pro-North material online. [20]

In August 2010, the South Korean government blocked a Twitter account operated by the North. [21]

In January 2011, a South Korean man was arrested for praising North Korea through social networking sites. [22] That same year another South Korean was arrested for posting 300 messages and 6 videos of pro-North content and sentenced to 10 months in jail. [23] A further 83 South Koreans were arrested for distributing pro-North material on the Internet. [20]

In January 2012, a South Korean freedom-of-speech activist was arrested for reblogging a post from a North Korean Twitter account. [20] [24]

South Korean president Lee Myung-bak's 2011 policies included cracking down on pro-North Korean comments on social network sites like Facebook and Twitter. [25] Reporters Without Borders noted that the government "[had] intensified" its campaign to censor pro-North Korea material in 2012 as well. [9]

In 2018, a South Korean man was arrested for demanding abolishment of the National Security Law and praising North Korea. He was sentenced to one year in prison. [26]

Nudity and obscenity

Screenshot of the warning shown to users when accessing blocked websites Korea Communications Standards Commission - Internet Warning - 2021.png
Screenshot of the warning shown to users when accessing blocked websites

The Government of South Korea practiced censorship of gay-content websites from 2001 to 2003, through its Information and Communications Ethics Committee (정보통신윤리위원회), an official organ of the Ministry of Information and Communication, under its category of "obscenity and perversion"; for example, it shut down the website ex-zone, a website about gay and lesbian issues, in 2001. [13] That practice has since been reversed. [27]

Since 2008, attempts by anybody to access "indecent Internet sites" featuring unrated games, pornography, gambling, etc., are automatically redirected to a warning page which states "This site is legally blocked by the government regulations." [28]

Search engines are required to verify age for some keywords deemed inappropriate for minors. For such keywords, age verification using a national identity number is required. For foreigners, a copy of their passport must be faxed for age verification. As of 2008, practically all large search engine companies in South Korea, including foreign-owned companies (e.g. Yahoo! Korea), have complied with this legislation. [29] In April 2009 when the Communication Commission ordered user verification be put on the system at YouTube, Google Korea blocked video uploading from users whose country setting is Korean. [30] In September 2012, Google re-enabled YouTube uploads in Korea following a three-year block. [31]

On December 21, 2010, the Korea Communications Commission announced that it planned to create guidelines about monitoring Internet content in case of a tense political situation, such as automatically deleting any online anti-government message. [32]

Criticism

The 2009 modification of the copyright law of South Korea introducing the three strikes policy has generated criticism, including regarding Internet freedoms and censorship. [33] Tens of thousands of Korean Internet users have been disconnected from the Internet after not three, but one strike. [34]

On September 6, 2011, the Electronic Frontier Foundation criticized the Korea Communications Standards Commission for proposing censorship and restriction on the blog of an Internet free speech activist, Dr. Gyeong-sin Park. [35] [36] The United Nations Human Rights Council's Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression warned South Korea's government about its censorship, noting among other things that South Korea's defamation laws are often used to punish statements "that are true and are in the public interest". [9]

Korean officials' rhetoric about censored material, including that it is "subversive", "illegal", "harmful" or related to "pornography and nudity", has been noted as similar to that of their Chinese counterparts. [13] Critics also say that the government takes prohibitions on profanity as "a convenient excuse to silence critics" and chill speech. [9]

South Korean conservative media outlets loyal to the Lee Myung-bak government are accused of advocating further Internet censorship, because the Internet is the main source of information for progressive South Korean youths. [37]

See also

Related Research Articles

China censors both the publishing and viewing of online material. Many controversial events are censored from news coverage, preventing many Chinese citizens from knowing about the actions of their government, and severely restricting freedom of the press. China's censorship includes the complete blockage of various websites, apps, video games, inspiring the policy's nickname, the Great Firewall of China, which blocks websites. Methods used to block websites and pages include DNS spoofing, blocking access to IP addresses, analyzing and filtering URLs, packet inspection, and resetting connections.

Although Australia is considered to have, in general, both freedom of speech and a free and independent media, certain subject-matter is subject to various forms of government censorship. These include matters of national security, judicial non-publication or suppression orders, defamation law, the federal Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), film and literature classification, and advertising restrictions.

Human rights in South Korea are codified in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, which compiles the legal rights of its citizens. These rights are protected by the Constitution and include amendments and national referendum. These rights have evolved significantly from the days of military dictatorship to the current state as a constitutional democracy with free and fair elections for the presidency and the members of the National Assembly.

Censorship in South Korea is implemented by various laws that were included in the constitution as well as acts passed by the National Assembly over the decades since 1948. These include the National Security Act, whereby the government may limit the expression of ideas that it perceives "praise or incite the activities of anti-state individuals or groups". Censorship was particularly severe during the country's authoritarian era, with freedom of expression being non-existent, which lasted from 1948 to 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet in Myanmar</span> Overview of the Internet in Myanmar

The Internet in Myanmar has been available since 2000 when the first Internet connections were established. Beginning in September 2011, historically-pervasive levels of Internet censorship in Burma were significantly reduced. Prior to September 2011, the military government worked aggressively to limit and control Internet access through software-based censorship, infrastructure and technical constraints, and laws and regulations with large fines and lengthy prison sentences for violators. In 2015, internet usage significantly increased to 12.6% with the introduction of faster mobile 3G internet by transnational telecommunication companies Telenor Myanmar and Ooredoo Myanmar, later joined by national Myanmar Post and Telecommunications(MPT). While the Internet situation in Myanmar has undergone change since its introduction in 2010 and reduction of censorship in 2011, laws such as the 2013 Telecommunications Law continue to restrict citizens from total freedom online. Despite restrictions, internet penetration continues to grow across the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship in Turkey</span>

Censorship in Turkey is regulated by domestic and international legislation, the latter taking precedence over domestic law, according to Article 90 of the Constitution of Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship</span> Legal control of the internet

Internet censorship is the legal control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. Censorship is most often applied to specific internet domains but exceptionally may extend to all Internet resources located outside the jurisdiction of the censoring state. Internet censorship may also put restrictions on what information can be made internet accessible. Organizations providing internet access – such as schools and libraries – may choose to preclude access to material that they consider undesirable, offensive, age-inappropriate or even illegal, and regard this as ethical behavior rather than censorship. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship of material they publish, for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, political views, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences.

Most Internet censorship in Thailand prior to the September 2006 military coup d'état was focused on blocking pornographic websites. The following years have seen a constant stream of sometimes violent protests, regional unrest, emergency decrees, a new cybercrimes law, and an updated Internal Security Act. Year by year Internet censorship has grown, with its focus shifting to lèse majesté, national security, and political issues. By 2010, estimates put the number of websites blocked at over 110,000. In December 2011, a dedicated government operation, the Cyber Security Operation Center, was opened. Between its opening and March 2014, the Center told ISPs to block 22,599 URLs.

Internet censorship in the United Kingdom is conducted under a variety of laws, judicial processes, administrative regulations and voluntary arrangements. It is achieved by blocking access to sites as well as the use of laws that criminalise publication or possession of certain types of material. These include English defamation law, the Copyright law of the United Kingdom, regulations against incitement to terrorism and child pornography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship in Hong Kong</span> Fact about Hong Kong

In general, there is relatively little Internet censorship in Hong Kong beyond laws that criminalize the distribution of unlicensed copyrighted material and obscene images, particularly child pornography when compared to the rest of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship</span> Suppression of speech or other information

Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions, and other controlling bodies.

Facebook is a social networking service that has been gradually replacing traditional media channels since 2010. Facebook has limited moderation of the content posted to its site. Because the site indiscriminately displays material publicly posted by users, Facebook can, in effect, threaten oppressive governments. Facebook can simultaneously propagate fake news, hate speech, and misinformation, thereby undermining the credibility of online platforms and social media.

Censorship of Twitter, refers to Internet censorship by governments that block access to Twitter (X). Twitter censorship also includes governmental notice and take down requests to Twitter, which it enforces in accordance with its Terms of Service when a government or authority submits a valid removal request to Twitter indicating that specific content is illegal in their jurisdiction.

There is medium internet censorship in France, including limited filtering of child pornography, laws against websites that promote terrorism or racial hatred, and attempts to protect copyright. The "Freedom on the Net" report by Freedom House has consistently listed France as a country with Internet freedom. Its global ranking was 6 in 2013 and 12 in 2017. A sharp decline in its score, second only to Libya was noted in 2015 and attributed to "problematic policies adopted in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack, such as restrictions on content that could be seen as 'apology for terrorism,' prosecutions of users, and significantly increased surveillance."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korea Communications Standards Commission</span> Government agency

The Korea Communications Standards Commission is an institution of the South Korean government that regulates communications including film, television, radio, and internet.

North Korea Tech is a US-based blog authored by British journalist Martyn Williams which covers consumer electronics and technology developments in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. It was established in 2010. North Korea Tech is based in Washington DC. The site is affiliated with 38 North.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of the press in South Korea</span>

South Korea is considered to have freedom of the press, but it is subject to several pressures. It has improved since South Korea transitioned to democracy in the late 20th century, but declined slightly in the 2010s. Freedom House Freedom of the Press has classified South Korean press as free from 2002 to 2010, and as partly free since 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Asia</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Asia provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Asia

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in the Americas</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in the Americas provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in the Americas.

References

  1. ↑ "[편집국에서] 텀블러 불법음란물의 온상, 사라질까?". 중도일보. 23 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2017-02-02. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
  2. ↑ "South Korea: Criminal defamation provisions threaten freedom of expression". ARTICLE 19. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  3. 1 2 Peng, H. (1997, January 1). How Countries Are Regulating Internet Content. Retrieved from http://www.isoc.org/INET97/proceedings/B1/B1_3.HTM Archived 2014-09-14 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ↑ Hun, M. (2008). Ban on Improper Communication on the Internet. Constitutional Court of Korea, Twenty Years of the Constitutional Court, 240-41.
  5. 1 2 3 Fish, E. (2009). IS INTERNET CENSORSHIP COMPATIBLE WITH DEMOCRACY? LEGAL RESTRICTIONS OF ONLINE SPEECH IN SOUTH KOREA. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and Law, 2, 43-96.
  6. ↑ S.C.S. (2014, February 10). Why South Korea is really an internet dinosaur. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/02/economist-explains-3 Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine
  7. 1 2 OpenNet Initiative "Summarized global Internet filtering data spreadsheet" Archived 2012-01-10 at the Wayback Machine , 8 November 2011 and "Country Profiles" Archived 2011-08-26 at the Wayback Machine , the OpenNet Initiative is a collaborative partnership of the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto; the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University; and the SecDev Group, Ottawa
  8. ↑ "Countries under surveillance: South Korea" Archived 2015-09-12 at the Wayback Machine , Reporters Without Borders, 12 March 2011
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Choe, Sang-hun (2012-08-12). "Korea Policing the Net. Twist? It's South Korea". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2012-08-14. Retrieved 2012-08-13.
  10. ↑ "Is South Korea Sliding Toward Digital Dictatorship?". Forbes . Retrieved 2019-05-27.
  11. ↑ Shim, Kyu-Seok (18 February 2019). "Gov't faces furor over internet crackdown". Korea JoongAng Daily . JoongAng Group. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  12. ↑ Park, Kyung-sin. "Administrative Internet Censorship by KCSC". opennetkorea.org. Retrieved 28 March 2022.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Chung, Jongpil (September–October 2008). "Comparing Online Activities in China and South Korea: The Internet and the Political Regime". Asian Survey . 48 (5): 727–751. doi:10.1525/AS.2008.48.5.727.
  14. ↑ "Thinking Beyond Punishment to Combat Digital Sex Crimes in South Korea". Human Rights Watch. 20 May 2020. Retrieved 20 May 2020.
  15. ↑ "Tough content rules mute Internet election activity in current contest: Bloggers risk arrest for controversial comments". Korea JoongAng Daily. 17 December 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-12-20. Retrieved 17 December 2007.
  16. ↑ "Do new Internet regulations curb free speech?" Archived 2011-01-23 at the Wayback Machine , Kim Hyung-eun, Korea JoongAng Daily, 13 August 2008
  17. ↑ "Google Disables Uploads, Comments on YouTube Korea" Archived 2012-07-04 at the Wayback Machine , Martyn Williams, IDG News, 13 April 2009
  18. ↑ Sangwon Yoon (25 May 2011). "North Korea Uses Twitter For Propaganda Offensive". The Huffington Post. Kwang-tae Kim (AP). Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2014-10-07. Retrieved 4 October 2015.
  19. ↑ Christian Oliver (1 April 2010). "Sinking underlines South Korean view of state as monster". London: Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2 April 2010.
  20. 1 2 3 "Pro-North Korea activists stick it out in South Korea | Public Radio International". Archived from the original on 2018-12-26. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
  21. ↑ Williams, Martyn (August 20, 2010). "South begins blocking North Korean Twitter account". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2010-12-28. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
  22. ↑ Kim, Eun-jung (2011-01-10). "S. Korean man indicted for pro-Pyongyang postings on Internet, Twitter". Yonhap News Agency . Archived from the original on 2011-07-22. Retrieved 2011-03-11.
  23. ↑ "SKorea teens flock online, snitch pro-North posts". Archived from the original on 2018-12-26. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
  24. ↑ Sang-Hun, Choe (2 February 2012). "South Korea Indicts Park Jung-geun over Twitter Posts - the New York Times". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2018-12-26. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
  25. ↑ Pro-North Facebook entries face gov't crackdown Archived 2011-02-26 at the Wayback Machine 2010-12-21 Joongang-Ilbo
  26. ↑ "South Korean receives prison term for North Korea praise - UPI.com". Archived from the original on 2018-12-26. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
  27. ↑ "Internet Censorship in South Korea". Information Policy. 8 January 2010. Archived from the original on 2011-07-16. Retrieved 2014-07-03.
  28. ↑ Automatic redirect to KCSC Warning Archived 2011-04-30 at the Wayback Machine
  29. ↑ "Searching For An Adult Topic? You'll Have To Prove Your Age To Google Korea" Archived 2012-07-17 at the Wayback Machine , Search Engine Land, 17 May 2007
  30. ↑ 한국 국가설정시 업로드 기능을 자발적으로 제한합니 (Video uploads limited by voluntarily setting country code to South Korea), The Official YouTube Korea Blog, Blogspot.com, 9 April 2009
  31. ↑ Google re-enables YouTube uploads in Korea, following a 3 year block Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine . TNW, 6 Sep 2012
  32. ↑ 김 (Kim), 재섭 (Jae-seop) (2010-12-22). "[단독] 정부, '긴장상황'때 인터넷글 무단삭제 추진". The Hankyoreh (in Korean). Archived from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2011-01-09.
  33. ↑ Doctorow, Cory (2010-10-26). "South Korea's US-led copyright policy leads to 65,000 acts of extrajudicial censorship/disconnection/threats by govt bureaucrats". Boing Boing. Archived from the original on 2017-12-01. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  34. ↑ "A Look At How Many People Have Been Kicked Offline In Korea On Accusations (Not Convictions) Of Infringement". Techdirt. 2010-10-26. Archived from the original on 2012-11-19. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  35. ↑ York, Jillian; Rainey Reitman (2011-09-06). "In South Korea, the Only Thing Worse Than Online Censorship is Secret Online Censorship". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on 2018-02-08. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  36. ↑ Lee (이), Jeong-hwan (정환) (2011-09-08). "EFF "방통심의위는 박경신 탄압 중단하라"". Media Today (in Korean). Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  37. ↑ Lee (이), Suk-i (숙이) (2011-12-05). "보수언론이 온라인과 전쟁하는 까닭". SisaInLive (in Korean). Archived from the original on 2012-01-04. Retrieved 2011-12-17.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.