Internet censorship in Pakistan

Last updated

Internet users in Pakistan are prompted to this message when accessing blocked websites. Blocked message pakistan.png
Internet users in Pakistan are prompted to this message when accessing blocked websites.

Internet censorship in Pakistan is due to the governments attempts to control information sent and received using social media and the Internet in Pakistan. Presently, as of December 2024, X (formerly Twitter) is banned, despite the government using the platform to issue official statements.

Contents

There have been significant instances of website access restriction in Pakistan, most notably when YouTube was banned/blocked from 2012 to 2016. Pakistan has asked a number of social media organisations to set up local offices within the country, but this is yet to happen. [1]

Pakistan made global headlines in 2010 for blocking Facebook and other Web sites in response to a contest popularized on the social networking site to draw images of the prophet Muhammad. In general, Internet filtering in Pakistan remains both inconsistent and intermittent, with filtering primarily targeted at content deemed to be a threat to national security, pornography, homosexuality and at religious content considered blasphemous. However, the present banning of Twitter is politically motivated.

In 2019, the National Assembly Standing Committee on Information Technology and Telecom was informed by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) that 900,000 URLs were blocked in Pakistan for "reasons such as carrying blasphemous and pornographic content and/or sentiments against the state, judiciary or the armed forces." In February 2023, Wikipedia was banned by the PTA for two days over alleged blasphemous content. [2]

Overview

In mid-2012 Pakistanis had relatively easy access to a wide range of content, including most sexual, political, social, and religious sites on the Internet. The OpenNet Initiative listed Internet filtering in Pakistan as substantial in the conflict/security area, and as selective in the political, social, and Internet tools areas in August 2012. [3] Additionally, Freedom House rated Pakistan's "Freedom on the Net Status" as "Not Free" in its Freedom on the Net 2022 report. [4] This is still true as of 2022. [5]

Internet filtering in Pakistan is regulated by the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) and the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) under the direction of the government, the Supreme Court of Pakistan, and the Ministry of Information Technology (MoIT). Although the majority of filtering in Pakistan is intermittent—such as the occasional block on a major Web site like Blogspot or YouTube—the PTA continues to block sites containing content it considers to be blasphemous, anti-Islamic, or threatening to internal security. Online civil society activism that began in order to protect free expression in the country continues to expand as citizens utilize new media to disseminate information and organize. [3]

Pakistan has blocked access to websites critical of the government or the military. [3] Blocking of websites is often carried out under the rubric of restricting access to "blasphemous" content, pornography, or religious immorality. [6] At the end of 2011, the PTA had officially banned more than 1,000 pornographic websites in Pakistan. [6] [7]

Current situation: 2024 political censorship of Twitter

X, formerly known as Twitter, has remained inaccessible in Pakistan since February 2024, depriving citizens of their basic right to access information. The Pakistan government blocked access to the social media platform around the time of the 2024 February elections, citing national security concerns. Despite the government's stance, both the government and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) refused to comment on the outages, which were widely reported by internet watchdog groups.

Activists challenging the ban argue that it was designed to suppress dissent following the February 8 general elections, which were marred by widespread claims of vote rigging and subsequent protests. Authorities had also shut down mobile services on the day of the elections, again citing security concerns. NetBlocks, an internet monitoring group, reported that users were unable to access X on 10 February while the country was awaiting the election results. [8]

In April 2024, the Sindh High Court ordered the government to restore access to the platform within one week, according to a report by the AFP news agency, citing lawyer Moiz Jaaferi, who had launched a separate challenge against the ban. [9] Despite this order, access to X has been sporadic, with availability fluctuating based on the internet service provider, forcing users to rely on virtual private networks (VPNs), as noted by Alp Toker of NetBlocks. [10]

Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, a prolific user of social media platforms, has been particularly impacted by this ban. This reliance on social media grew especially after the country’s traditional media began censoring news about Khan and his party in the run-up to the elections. Khan, who has more than 20 million followers on X, saw his party call for protests against alleged rigging in the February 2024 General Elections. A government official’s admission of vote manipulation in mid-February raised further concerns about the transparency of the elections confirming Imran Khan’s claims to many and furthering the allegations. [8] [11] [12]

NetBlocks, the internet Observatory confirmed through its Live metrics showing X/Twitter has been restricted in #Pakistan for since February, with service remaining fully or intermittently restricted for most users. They added that the incident comes amidst a surge in internet censorship during elections marred by irregularities in Pakistan. [13] Asad Baig, a media strategist at Dawn News said that “The government’s actions reek of authoritarianism, stifling dissent, and silencing voices in the name of maintaining control.” [14]

Several condemnations of the ban were also exchanged by many non-governmental organizations.

Pakistan Internet Exchange

The Pakistan Internet Exchange (PIE), operated by the state-owned Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd (PTCL), was created to facilitate the exchange of Internet traffic between ISPs within and outside of Pakistan. [15] Because the majority of Pakistan's Internet traffic is routed through the PIE (98% of Pakistani ISPs used the PIE in 2004), it provides a means to monitor and possibly block incoming and outgoing Internet traffic as the government deems fit. [16]

Internet surveillance in Pakistan is primarily conducted by the PIE under the auspices of the PTA. The PIE monitors all incoming and outgoing Internet traffic from Pakistan, as well as e-mail and keywords, and stores data for a specified amount of time. Law enforcement agencies such as the FIA can be asked by the government to conduct surveillance and monitor content. Under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Ordinance (PECO), ISPs are required to retain traffic data for a minimum of 90 days and may also be required to collect real-time data and record information while keeping their involvement with the government confidential. The ordinance does not specify what kinds of actions constitute grounds for data collection and surveillance. [3]

Pakistan Telecommunication Company

In April 2003, the PTCL announced that it would be stepping up monitoring of pornographic websites. "Anti-Islamic" and "blasphemous" sites were also monitored. [17] In early March 2004, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) ordered Internet service providers (ISPs) to monitor access to all pornographic content. The ISPs, however, lacked the technical know-how, and felt that the PTCL was in a better position to carry out FIA's order. A Malaysian firm was then hired to provide a filtering system, but failed to deliver a working system.[ citation needed ]

National URL filtering and blocking system

In March 2012, the Pakistan government took the unusual step of touting for firms that could help build it a nationwide content-filtering service. [18] The Pakistan Telecommunications Authority published a request for proposals for the "deployment and operation of a national level URL Filtering and Blocking System" which would operate on similar lines to China's Golden Shield, or "Great Firewall". [18] Academic and research institutions as well as private commercial entities had until 16 March to submit their proposals, according to the request's detailed 35-point system requirements list. Key among these is the following: "Each box should be able to handle a block list of up to 50 million URLs (concurrent unidirectional filtering capacity) with processing delay of not more than 1 milliseconds". [18]

Deep packet inspection (DPI)

The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) states that the DPI system has been installed to implement the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016, particularly to filter and block blasphemous content and any material that is considered to be against the integrity or security of Pakistan. [19] Canadian firm Sandvine was contracted to provide and set up the equipment in Pakistan. [20]

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons

The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy began after 12 editorial cartoons, most of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad, were published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on 30 September 2005. This led to protests across the Muslim world, some of which escalated into violence with instances of firing on crowds of protestors, resulting in more than 100 reported deaths, [21] and included the bombing of the Danish embassy in Pakistan, setting fire to the Danish Embassies in Syria, Lebanon and Iran, storming of European buildings, and the burning of the Danish, Dutch, Norwegian, French, and German flags in Gaza City. [22] [23] The posting of the cartoons online added to the controversy.

On 1 March 2006 the Supreme Court of Pakistan directed the government to keep tabs on Internet sites displaying the cartoons and called for an explanation from authorities as to why these sites had not been blocked earlier. [24] On 2 March 2006, pursuant to a petition filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, the Supreme Court sitting en banc ordered the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) and other government departments to adopt measures for blocking websites showing blasphemous content. The Court also ordered Attorney General Makhdoom Ali Khan to explore laws which would enable blocking of objectionable websites. In announcing the decision, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, said, "We will not accept any excuse or technical objection on this issue because it relates to the sentiments of the entire Muslim world. All authorities concerned will have to appear in the Court on the next hearing with reports of concrete measures taken to implement our order".

Consequently, the government kept tabs on a number of websites hosting the cartoons deemed to be sacrilegious. This ban included all the weblogs hosted at the popular blogging service blogger.com, as some bloggers had put up copies of the cartoons – particularly many non-Pakistani blogs.

A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Chaudhry, summoned the country's Attorney General as well as senior communication ministry officials to give a report of "concrete measures for implementation of the court's order". At the hearing on 14 March 2006, the PTA informed the Supreme Court that all websites displaying the Muhammad cartoons had been blocked. The bench issued directions to the Attorney General of Pakistan, Makhdoom Ali Khan, to assist the court on how it could exercise jurisdiction to prevent the availability of blasphemous material on websites the world over. [25]

The blanket ban on the blogspot.com blogs was lifted on 2 May 2006. [26] Shortly thereafter the blanket ban was reimposed and extended to Typepad blogs. The blanket ban on the blogspot.com blogs was later lifted again.

Allegations of suppressing vote-rigging videos by the Musharraf administration were also leveled by Pakistani bloggers, newspapers, media, and Pakistani anti-Musharraf opposition parties. The ban was lifted on 26 February 2008. [27] [28]

Social media and platform blocking

YouTube was blocked in Pakistan following a decision taken by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority on 22 February 2008 because of the number of "non-Islamic objectionable videos." [28] [29] One report specifically named Fitna , a controversial Dutch film, as the basis for the block. [30] Pakistan, an Islamic republic, ordered its ISPs to block access to YouTube "for containing blasphemous web content/movies." [31] The action effectively blocked YouTube access worldwide for several hours on 24 February. [32] Defaming Muhammad under § 295-C of the Blasphemy law in Pakistan requires a death sentence. [33] This followed increasing unrest in Pakistan by over the reprinting of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons which depict satirical criticism of Islam. [31] Router misconfiguration by one Pakistani ISP on 24 February 2008 effectively blocked YouTube access worldwide for several hours. [32] On 26 February 2008, the ban was lifted after the website had removed the objectionable content from its servers at the demand of the Government of Pakistan. [27]

On 19 and 20 May 2010, Pakistan's Telecommunication Authority PTA imposed a ban on Wikipedia, YouTube, Flickr, and Facebook in response to a competition entitled Everybody Draw Mohammed Day on Facebook, in a bid to contain "blasphemous" material. [34] [35] [36] The ban imposed on Facebook was the result of a ruling by the Lahore High Court, while the ban on the other websites was imposed arbitrarily by the PTA on the grounds of "objectionable content", a different response from earlier requests, such as pages created to promote peaceful demonstrations in Pakistani cities being removed because they were "inciting violence". The sitewide ban on Facebook was lifted on 27 May 2010, after Facebook filtered content so that users in Pakistan could not access the "blasphemous" content. [36] However, individual videos deemed offensive to Muslims that are posted on YouTube will continue to be blocked. [37] [38]

In September 2012, the PTA blocked the video-sharing website YouTube for not removing an anti-Islamic film made in the United States, Innocence of Muslims , which mocks Muhammed. The website would remain suspended, it was stated, until the film was removed. [39] [40] In a related move, the PTA announced that it had blocked about 20,000 websites due to "objectionable" content. [41]

On 25 July 2013, the government announced that it is mulling over reopening YouTube during the second week of August. A special 12-member committee was working under the Minister of IT and Telecommunication, Anusha Rahman, to see if objectionable content can be removed. The Pakistan Telecommunications Authority, the telecom watchdog in the country, has already expressed its inability to filter out select content. [42]

On 21 April 2014, Pakistan's Senate Standing Committee on Human Rights requested the Federal Government remove the ban on YouTube. [43] [44]

On 8 February 2015, the government announced that YouTube will remain blocked 'indefinitely' because no tool or solution had been found which can totally block offensive content. [45] As of June 2015 — 1,000 days on — the ban was still in effect, and YouTube cannot be accessed from either desktop or mobile devices. [44]

The ban was lifted due to technical glitch on 6 December 2015 according to ISPs in Pakistan. [46] As September 2016, the ban has been lifted officially, as YouTube launched a local version for Pakistan. [47]

On 25 November 2017, the NetBlocks internet shutdown observatory and Digital Rights Foundation identified mass-scale blocking of social media and content-sharing websites including YouTube, Twitter and Facebook throughout Pakistan imposed by the government in response to the violent Tehreek-e-Labaik protests. [48] [49] [50] The technical investigation found that all major Pakistani fixed-line and mobile service providers were affected by the restrictions, which were lifted by the PTA the next day when protests abated following the resignation of Minister for Law and Justice Zahid Hamid. [51]

In 2019, The National Assembly Standing Committee on Information Technology and Telecom was informed by the PTA that 900,000 URLs were blocked in Pakistan for "reasons such as carrying blasphemous and pornographic content and/or sentiments against the state, judiciary or the armed forces."

On 9 October 2020, TikTok was banned by the PTA for "immoral content" [52]

On 16 April 2021, various social media applications were banned. The Ministry of Interior ordered the PTA to restrict access of Pakistani users to Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube, and Telegram. [53] It was issued to block these social media websites from 11:00 AM to 03:00 PM on Friday with an immediate effect. The reason to put a temporary ban on these social media platforms was not mentioned on the official notice. Later on, PTA explained the ban by putting forward the statement, "In order to maintain public order and safety, access to certain social media applications has been restricted temporarily." There was a severe condition in Pakistan due to Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan anti-France protests. The condition became more intense after Pakistan announced to ban Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan under Anti-Terror Law. [54]

On Sunday 5 February 2023, Wikipedia was banned due to not removing purportedly blasphemous materials but it could still be accessed using the app.[ citation needed ] The ban was lifted on Tuesday 7 February 2023, with the PM Office stating, "Blocking the site in its entirety was not a suitable measure to restrict access to some objectionable contents and sacrilegious matter on it." [55]

In February 2024, X (formerly Twitter) was reportedly blocked as per reports of users. However there were no official announcements from the government. On 17 April 2024, Pakistan's interior ministry told the Islamabad High Court that the block was amid general election over national security concerns. Later the court asked the government to restore the platform within one week. [56]

In November 2024, Bluesky was banned by Pakistani authorities, which was confirmed by internet watchdog NetBlocks. [57]

Netsweeper usage

In June 2013, the Citizen Lab interdisciplinary research laboratory uncovered that Canadian internet-filtering product Netsweeper to be in use at the national level in Pakistan. The system has categorized billions of URLs and is adding 10 million new URLs every day. The lab also confirmed that ISPs in Pakistan are using methods of DNS tampering to block websites at the behest of Pakistan Telecommunication Authority.

According to the report published by the lab, "Netsweeper technology is being implemented in Pakistan for purposes of political and social filtering, including websites of secessionist movements, sensitive religious topics, and independent media." [58]

2020 rules

In October 2020 Government of Pakistan issued new policy rules called Citizens Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules 2020 or the Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Content (Procedure, Oversight and Safeguards) under 2016 Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA).

The government of Pakistan intends to access internet user data and control and remove objectionable content. [59] [60] [61] The companies would be required to remove or block any asked content from their websites within 24 hours after being reported by Pakistani authorities, social media companies or internet service providers face may be fined of up to $3.14 million (€2.57 million) for failure to curb the sharing of content deemed to be defamatory of Islam, promoting terrorism, hate speech, pornography or any content viewed as problematic to Pakistan's national security. [59] [60] [61]

Rights activists complain that new rules are compromising user privacy at mercy of Pakistani establishment sans judicial oversight, likely to erode media freedom and freedom of expression further there by erode political freedoms and result in increased censorship. [59] [60] [61]

Since then, dating apps like Tinder are banned in Pakistan, video sharing app named TikTok faced a temporary ban til removed content; issued notices to U.S.A. based Ahmadiyya community web portal TrueIslam.com, Google and Wikipedia for returning search results displaying Ahmadiyya community and their leadership, Mirza Masroor Ahmad, 's claims of Muslimness. [62] [63] [59] [60] [61]

Blocked by Pakistan Telecommunication Authority

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.
NameType of siteStated reasonStart dateResolution dateBlocked by
YouTube [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] Video hosting service Blasphemous material25 February 2008
May 2010
Flickr [67] [70] [71] [72] [73] Social networking service Blasphemous material (partial block)
Omegle (now defunct)Social networking serviceNo reason statedNov 2021Unknown
9gag
Wikipedia [67] [70] [71] [72] [73] Multilingual, web-based, free-content encyclopedia Blasphemous material (partial block)May 2010
Twitter [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] Social networking service Blasphemous material
Rabwah Times [74] Online newspaper 29 May 2014Current
WordPress [75] Blog hosting National Security22 March 2015
Quora Q&A website No reason stated17 September 201924 September 2019
Reddit (some subreddits only) Social news Pornography UnknownCurrent
Imgur Image sharing platform3 January 202023 December 2020
ImgBoxNo reason statedUnknownUnknown
uTorrent Torrent Client
TikTok [52] SocialImmoral content9 October 202020 October 2020
DeviantArt Image Sharing Platform Pornography Unknown (discovered 1 January 2021)Unknown (discovered 21 May 2024)
Facebook [76] [77] [78] Social networking platform No reason stated1100hrs PKT, 16 April 2021.1500hrs PKT, 16 April 2021.
Twitter [76] [77] [78]
YouTube [76] [77] [78] Video hosting service
WhatsApp [76] [77] [78] Messaging service
Telegram [76] [77] [78]
Wikipedia [79] [80] Multilingual, web-based, free-content encyclopedia Sacrilegious Content4 February 20237 February 2023
Insaf.pk [81] Political website26 January 2024Till dateProbably PTA
Twitter Social networking platform Amid Disinformation 19 february 2024Till dateProbably PTA

Video games ban

PUBG ban

In July 2020, PTA banned the online game PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds, [82] Millions of social media users of Pakistan have flooded sites like Facebook, Twitter and have shown overwhelming support for PUBG (PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds). [83] In response, PTA lifted ban on the popular online game. [84]

Pornography ban

Other notable bans

See also

Related Research Articles

Internet censorship in Australia is enforced by both the country's criminal law as well as voluntarily enacted by internet service providers. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has the power to enforce content restrictions on Internet content hosted within Australia, and maintain a blocklist of overseas websites which is then provided for use in filtering software. The restrictions focus primarily on child pornography, sexual violence, and other illegal activities, compiled as a result of a consumer complaints process.

Censorship in South Asia can apply to books, movies, the Internet and other media. Censorship occurs on religious, moral and political grounds, which is controversial in itself as the latter especially is seen as contrary to the tenets of democracy, in terms of freedom of speech and the right to freely criticise the government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pakistan Telecommunication Authority</span> Telecom regulator

The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) (Urdu: ‎مقتدرہِ ٹیلی مواصلات پاکستان) is the telecommunication regulator of Pakistan, responsible for the establishment, operation and maintenance of telecommunication systems and the provision of telecommunication services in Pakistan. Headquartered in Islamabad, PTA also has regional offices located in Karachi, Lahore, Peshawar, Quetta, Muzaffarabad, Rawalpindi, Multan and Gilgit.

The Pakistani Constitution limits Censorship in Pakistan, but allows "reasonable restrictions in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of Pakistan or public order or morality". Press freedom in Pakistan is limited by official censorship that restricts critical reporting and by the high level of violence against journalists. The armed forces, the judiciary, and religion are topics that frequently attract the government's attention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship in India</span>

Internet censorship in India is done by both central and state governments. DNS filtering and educating service users in suggested usages is an active strategy and government policy to regulate and block access to Internet content on a large scale. Measures for removing content at the request of content creators through court orders have also become more common in recent years. Initiating a mass surveillance government project like Golden Shield Project is an alternative that has been discussed over the years by government bodies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship</span> Legal control of the internet

Internet censorship is the legal control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. Censorship is most often applied to specific internet domains but exceptionally may extend to all Internet resources located outside the jurisdiction of the censoring state. Internet censorship may also put restrictions on what information can be made internet accessible. Organizations providing internet access – such as schools and libraries – may choose to preclude access to material that they consider undesirable, offensive, age-inappropriate or even illegal, and regard this as ethical behavior rather than censorship. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship of material they publish, for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, political views, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences.

Most Internet censorship in Thailand prior to the September 2006 military coup d'état was focused on blocking pornographic websites. The following years have seen a constant stream of sometimes violent protests, regional unrest, emergency decrees, a new cybercrimes law, and an updated Internal Security Act. Year by year Internet censorship has grown, with its focus shifting to lèse majesté, national security, and political issues. By 2010, estimates put the number of websites blocked at over 110,000. In December 2011, a dedicated government operation, the Cyber Security Operation Center, was opened. Between its opening and March 2014, the Center told ISPs to block 22,599 URLs.

Internet censorship in Singapore is carried out by the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA). Internet services provided by the three major Internet service providers (ISPs) are subject to regulation by the MDA, which requires blocking of a symbolic number of websites containing "mass impact objectionable" material, including Playboy, YouPorn and Ashley Madison. The civil service, tertiary institutions and Institute of Technical Education has its own jurisdiction to block websites displaying pornography, information about drugs and online piracy.

Internet censorship in the United Kingdom is conducted under a variety of laws, judicial processes, administrative regulations and voluntary arrangements. It is achieved by blocking access to sites as well as the use of laws that criminalise publication or possession of certain types of material. These include English defamation law, the Copyright law of the United Kingdom, regulations against incitement to terrorism and child pornography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship of YouTube</span> Censorship of the video sharing media site

Censorship of video-sharing platform YouTube occurs to varying degrees in many countries.

The Internet in Bangladesh has witnessed significant growth despite facing many constraints in expanding Internet access and use, development of the Internet and Information Technology are high government priorities. In March 2021, Internet users in Bangladesh increased to 116 million. On 19 February 2018, Bangladesh started the 4G network service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia</span> Blacklist of Wikipedia in the UK

On 5 December 2008, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), a British watchdog group, blacklisted content on the English Wikipedia related to Scorpions' 1976 studio album Virgin Killer, due to the presence of its controversial cover artwork, depicting a young girl posing nude, with a faux shattered-glass effect obscuring her genitalia. The image was deemed to be "potentially illegal content" under English law which forbids the possession or creation of indecent photographs of children. The IWF's blacklist is used in web filtering systems such as Cleanfeed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Everybody Draw Mohammed Day</span> 2010 action day

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day was a 2010 event in support of artists threatened with violence for drawing representations of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. It stemmed from a protest against censorship of the American television show South Park episode "201", led by the show's distributor Comedy Central, in response to death threats that had been made against some of those responsible for two segments broadcast in April 2010. A drawing representing Muhammad was posted on the Internet on April 20, 2010, with a message suggesting that "everybody" create a drawing depicting Muhammad on May 20 in support of free speech.

Facebook is a social networking service that has been gradually replacing traditional media channels since 2010. Facebook has limited moderation of the content posted to its site. Because the site indiscriminately displays material publicly posted by users, Facebook can, in effect, threaten oppressive governments. Facebook can simultaneously propagate fake news, hate speech, and misinformation, thereby undermining the credibility of online platforms and social media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship of Twitter</span> Restrictions to access on Twitter by governments

Censorship of Twitter refers to Internet censorship by governments that block access to Twitter. Twitter censorship also includes governmental notice and take down requests to Twitter, which it enforces in accordance with its Terms of Service when a government or authority submits a valid removal request to Twitter indicating that specific content published on the platform is illegal in their jurisdiction.

Pornography in Pakistan is subject to several legal provisions. The Government of Pakistan has placed ban on internet websites containing such material since November 2011. Major pornography website are already barred in Pakistan. In 2016, it was reported that government of Pakistan ordered Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in Pakistan to block more than 400,000 websites which contained pornographic content. Later in 2019, around 800,000 additional website containing pornographic content were banned by the Pakistan Telecom Authority on the order of government of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Countries blocking access to The Pirate Bay</span>

This is a list of countries where at least one internet service provider (ISP) formerly or currently censors the popular file sharing website The Pirate Bay (TPB).

The precise number of websites blocked in the United Kingdom is unknown. Blocking techniques vary from one Internet service provider (ISP) to another with some sites or specific URLs blocked by some ISPs and not others. Websites and services are blocked using a combination of data feeds from private content-control technology companies, government agencies, NGOs, court orders in conjunction with the service administrators who may or may not have the power to unblock, additionally block, appeal or recategorise blocked content.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Asia</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Asia provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Asia.

References

  1. ↑ "Google, Facebook and Twitter threaten to leave Pakistan over new rules". Hindustan times. 21 November 2020.
  2. ↑ "Wikipedia ban in Pakistan over alleged blasphemous content lifted".
  3. 1 2 3 4 "ONI Country Profile: Pakistan" Archived 21 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine , OpenNet Initiative, 6 August 2012. Retrieved 16 November 2013.
  4. ↑ "Pakistan" Archived 4 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine , Freedom on the Net 2013, Freedom House, 23 January 2022. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
  5. ↑ "Pakistan" Archived 24 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine , Freedom on the Net 2015, Freedom House, Retrieved 8 July 2016.
  6. 1 2 Pakistan, Freedom on the Net 2012 Archived 22 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine report by Freedom House
  7. ↑ PTA approved: Over 1,000 porn sites blocked in Pakistan Archived 7 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine The Express Tribune, 18 November 2011
  8. 1 2 "Pakistan says it blocked social media platform X over 'national security'". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  9. ↑ "Sindh High Court orders unblocking of social media platform X in Pakistan". www.canadianlawyermag.com. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  10. ↑ "X working with Pakistan govt to 'understand concerns' over ban". France 24. 18 April 2024. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  11. ↑ "Pakistan official admits involvement in rigging election results". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  12. ↑ "Key Ally of Pakistan's Prime Minister Demands End to Ban on X, Formerly Twitter". thediplomat.com. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  13. ↑ NetBlocks’ official Tweet (1) NetBlocks’ official Tweet (2)
  14. ↑ Baig, Asad (27 April 2024). "Censorship and disinformation". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  15. ↑ "The current state of the Internet in Pakistan" Archived 28 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine , Tee Emm, e-mail, archived by the Network Startup Resource Center (NSRC), 27 May 2004
  16. ↑ "The National Access Point: The Dilemma of Vision" Archived 20 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine , by Zubair Fasial Abbasi, e-mail sent to s-asia-it, archived at the Asia Pacific Network Information Center (APNIC), 14 July 2000
  17. ↑ "KARACHI: PTCL begins blocking proxy servers: Proscribed sites" Archived 24 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine , Bahzad Alam, Dawn, 28 July 2003Khan
  18. 1 2 3 National ICT R&D Fund (March 2012). "Request for Proposal" (PDF). National ICT R&D Fund. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 March 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2019.
  19. ↑ "Pakistan's digital spaces and privacy: Unpacking DPI and its implications | Political Economy | thenews.com.pk". www.thenews.com.pk. Retrieved 21 November 2023.
  20. ↑ Desk, Monitoring (25 October 2019). "Govt working with controversial firm to monitor internet traffic: report". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 21 November 2023.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  21. ↑ "Cartoon Body Count". Web. 2 March 2006. Archived from the original on 26 March 2006.
  22. ↑ "Arson and Death Threats as Muhammad Caricature Controversy Escalates". Spiegel online. 4 February 2006. Archived from the original on 2 May 2007. Retrieved 26 April 2007.
  23. ↑ "Embassies torched in cartoon fury". CNN.com. 5 February 2006. Archived from the original on 6 February 2007. Retrieved 26 April 2007.
  24. ↑ "Blasphemous websites be blocked, orders SC". Dawn. 2 March 2006. Archived from the original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
  25. ↑ "Websites blocked, PTA tells SC: Blasphemous material". Dawn. 14 March 2006. Archived from the original on 12 September 2013. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
  26. ↑ "Blogspot ban lifted in Pakistan", Wikinews, 6 May 2006
  27. 1 2 "Pakistan lifts YouTube ban". ABC News (Australia). Agence France-Presse. 26 February 2008. Archived from the original on 1 March 2008. Retrieved 26 February 2008.
  28. 1 2 "Access to YouTube blocked until further notice because of "non-Islamic" videos". Reporters Without Borders. 27 February 2008. Archived from the original on 19 November 2015. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
  29. ↑ "Pakistan blocks Facebook in row over Muhammad drawings" Archived 14 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine , Declan Walsh, The Guardian, 19 May 2010
  30. ↑ "Pakistan blocks YouTube website" Archived 7 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine , BBC News, 24 February 2008
  31. 1 2 "Pakistan blocks YouTube for 'blasphemous' content: officials" Archived 21 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine , Agence France-Presse (AFP), 24 February 2008
  32. 1 2 "Pakistan move knocked out YouTube". CNN.com (Asia). Natalie Bookchin (bookchin.net). 25 February 2008. Archived from the original on 14 October 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2008.
  33. ↑ "Section 295-C" Archived 18 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine , Pakistan Criminal Code, 12 October 1986
  34. ↑ "Pakistan blocks Facebook over Mohammed cartoon" Archived 22 May 2010 at the Wayback Machine , Waqar Hussain, Agence France-Presse (AFP), 19 May 2010
  35. ↑ Walsh, Declan (20 May 2010). "Pakistan blocks YouTube access over Muhammad depictions". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 14 September 2013. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
  36. 1 2 Gillespie, Tarleton (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press. p. 191. ISBN   978-0-300-23502-9.
  37. ↑ "YouTube ban lifted by Pakistan authorities" Archived 22 July 2010 at the Wayback Machine , Joanne McCabe, Metro (Associated Newspapers Limited, UK), 27 May 2010, accessed 18 September 2012
  38. ↑ "Pakistan lifts ban on YouTube", The Times of India, 27 May 2010
  39. ↑ "YouTube blocked in Pakistan" Archived 12 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine , Hayley Tsukayama, Washington Post, 17 September 2012
  40. ↑ "YouTube blocked in Pakistan for not removing anti-Islam film". New Delhi Television (NDTV). 17 September 2012. Archived from the original on 18 September 2012. Retrieved 18 September 2012.
  41. ↑ "Pakistan blocks 20,000 websites". The Hindu . 8 October 2012. Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
  42. ↑ "YouTube ban may be lifted after Eid". The Express Tribune . 25 July 2013. Archived from the original on 27 July 2013. Retrieved 26 July 2013.
  43. ↑ "Pakistan senate panel on Human Rights revokes ban on YouTube". IANS. news.biharprabha.com. Archived from the original on 23 April 2014. Retrieved 21 April 2014.
  44. 1 2 Azhar Khan (14 June 2015). "Exclusive: 1,000 days on, YouTube remains blocked in Pakistan". ARY News . Archived from the original on 26 October 2015. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
  45. ↑ "YouTube to remain blocked 'indefinitely' in Pakistan: officials". Dawn . Agence France-Presse. 8 February 2015. Archived from the original on 16 July 2015. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
  46. ↑ "YouTube accessible in Pakistan by mistake". 6 December 2015. Archived from the original on 31 December 2015. Retrieved 10 January 2016.
  47. ↑ Masood, Tooba; Bashir, Omer (29 September 2016). "YouTube Pakistan officially launched". Dawn. Archived from the original on 1 October 2016. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  48. ↑ "DRF and NetBlocks find blanket and nation-wide ban on social media in Pakistan and demand it to be lifted immediately". Digital Rights Foundation. 26 November 2017. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
  49. ↑ "Activists assail blanket ban on social media". The Nation. 27 November 2017. Archived from the original on 28 November 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
  50. ↑ "All you need to know about nation-wide internet disruptions during dharna". Samaa TV. 27 November 2017. Archived from the original on 27 November 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
  51. ↑ "The issue of social media networking". The Nation. 26 November 2017. Archived from the original on 28 November 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
  52. 1 2 Hussain, Javed (9 October 2020). "PTA bans TikTok over complaints against 'immoral content'". dawn.com. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  53. ↑ Social Media blocked in Pakistan
  54. ↑ Pakistan to ban Tehreek-e-Labbaik
  55. ↑ "PM orders immediate restoration of Wikipedia". The Express Tribune. 6 February 2023. Retrieved 7 February 2023.
  56. ↑ "Pakistan blocked social media platform X over national security, ministry tells court". WION. 17 April 2024. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
  57. ↑ https://www.techradar.com/pro/vpn/pakistan-blocks-bluesky-amid-popularity-surge
  58. ↑ "Pakistani government using Netsweeper for internet filtering Archived 2013-07-22 at the Wayback Machine " The Express Tribune. 20 June 2013.
  59. 1 2 3 4 Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "Pakistan seeks to 'control digital media' amid anti-government protests | DW | 28 October 2020". DW.COM. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  60. 1 2 3 4 Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "Pakistan: Social media curbs shrink free speech space | DW | 21 December 2020". DW.COM. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  61. 1 2 3 4 Shahzad, Asif (19 November 2020). "New internet rules to give Pakistan blanket powers of censorship". Reuters. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  62. ↑ "Pakistan attempts to prosecute Ahmadi US citizens for digital blasphemy". Religion News Service. 13 January 2021. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  63. ↑ Hussain, Javed (25 December 2020). "PTA issues notices to Google, Wikipedia for 'disseminating sacrilegious content'". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  64. 1 2 Ribeiro, John (25 February 2008). "Pakistan causes worldwide YouTube blackout". Macworld UK. Archived from the original on 12 October 2015.
  65. 1 2 Graham, Stephen (26 February 2008). "Pakistan Lifts YouTube Ban". The Huffington Post . Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  66. 1 2 "TWA Internet Backbone Blocks Only Blasphemous Video URL". Don’t Block the Blog. 24 February 2008. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  67. 1 2 3 4 "Pakistan". OpenNet Initiative. Archived from the original on 31 May 2019. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  68. 1 2 "Pakistan Drops YouTube Ban". CBS News/AP. 25 February 2008. Archived from the original on 15 May 2013. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  69. 1 2 Sandoval, Greg (26 February 2008). "Pakistan welcomes back YouTube". CNET News Blogs. Archived from the original on 15 October 2008. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  70. 1 2 3 Gillani, Waqar (19 May 2010). "Pakistan: Court Blocks Facebook". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 22 June 2018. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  71. 1 2 3 Jeewanjee, Zainab (20 May 2010). "Facebook Banned in Pakistan—May 2010". World Affairs Blog Network. Archived from the original on 7 June 2010. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  72. 1 2 3 Walsh, Declan (31 May 2010). "Pakistan Lifts Facebook Ban but 'Blasphemous' Pages Stay Hidden". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 31 May 2019. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  73. 1 2 3 Shahzad, Asif (25 June 2010). "Internet Censorship in Pakistan: Watching Google for Blasphemy". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 23 June 2018. Retrieved 29 October 2019.
  74. ↑ Times, Rabwah [@RabwahTimes] (29 May 2014). "Received this from a reader in Pakistan where RabwahTimes has been banned for blasphemous content" (Tweet). Retrieved 11 September 2020– via Twitter.
  75. ↑ "WordPress banned in Pakistan over | Technology | Dunya News".
  76. 1 2 3 4 5 Ali, Kalbe (16 April 2021). "Social media access partially restored in Pakistan after blockage to 'maintain public order'". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 16 April 2021.
  77. 1 2 3 4 5 Zulfikar, Fahad (16 April 2021). "Pakistan temporarily blocks major social media sites including Facebook and Twitter after TLP's violent protests". Brecorder. Retrieved 16 April 2021.
  78. 1 2 3 4 5 "Pakistan temporarily blocks social media". TechCrunch. Retrieved 16 April 2021.
  79. ↑ "Pakistan Bans Wikipedia Over 'Sacrilegious Content'". VOA. 4 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  80. ↑ "Pakistan blocks Wikipedia for 'blasphemous content'". BBC News. 4 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  81. ↑ "PTI says its websites 'blocked' in Pakistan ahead of Feb 8 polls". DAWN.COM. 26 January 2024. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  82. ↑ "Media Center | PTA". www.pta.gov.pk. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
  83. ↑ "Pakistani PUBG Players are Tweeting to PM Imran Khan to Unban the Popular Game". News18. 27 July 2020. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
  84. ↑ Jahangir, Ramsha (28 July 2020). "Ban on PUBG to remain in interest of public order: PTA". DAWN.COM. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
  85. ↑ "Top torrent sites and Richard Dawkins blocked in Pakistan". TorrentFreak . 23 July 2013. Archived from the original on 24 July 2013. Retrieved 25 July 2013.
  86. ↑ Nighat Dad (23 November 2013). "Why was IMDB blocked?". The Express Tribune . Archived from the original on 3 September 2014. Retrieved 30 August 2014.
  87. ↑ Pirzada, Usman. "Xbox Live, Playstation Network and GameRanger blocked in Pakistan – Accidentally". WCCFTech. WCCFTech. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2014.
  88. ↑ "Top 10 most popular torrent sites of 2013 Archived 2013-07-12 at the Wayback Machine " TorrentFreak. 6 January 2013.
  89. ↑ "Top Torrent sites banned in Pakistan Archived 2013-07-24 at the Wayback Machine " TorrentFreak. 25 July 2013.
  90. ↑ "ISPs gratuitously filter Torrent sites " The Nation. 25 July 2013.
  91. ↑ "Are Torrents banned in Pakistan? For the time being, yes Archived 2013-07-25 at the Wayback Machine " ProPakistani. 24 July 2013.
  92. ↑ "IT Minister's Twitter account deactivated amidst critique of policies Archived 2013-07-27 at the Wayback Machine " The Express Tribune. 24 July 2013.
  93. ↑ "No sexting in Pakistan" Archived 20 August 2016 at the Wayback Machine , DailyDot. Retrieved 21 November 2011
  94. ↑ "Here's Every Single Word You're Not Allowed to Text in Pakistan" Archived 18 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine , Gizmodo. Retrieved 21 November 2011
  95. ↑ "Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Attempts to Ban 'Obscene' Words from Texts" Archived 16 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine , Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved 28 November 2011
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.