| Jivamukti Yoga | |
|---|---|
Jivamukti Yoga logo | |
| Founder | David Life and Sharon Gannon, disciples of Sri Brahmananda Sarasvati, Swami Nirmalananda, and Sri K. Pattabhi Jois |
| Established | 1984 |
| Practice emphases | |
| scripture (shastra), devotion (bhakti), nonviolence (ahimsa), music (nada yoga), meditation (dhyana), hatha yoga. | |
| Related schools | |
| Ashtanga Vinyasa Yoga | |
The Jivamukti Yoga method is a proprietary style of yoga created by David Life and Sharon Gannon in 1984. [1]
Jivamukti is a physical, ethical, and spiritual practice, combining a vigorous yoga as exercise, vinyasa-based physical style with adherence to five central tenets: shastra (scripture), bhakti (devotion), ahims ā (nonviolence, non-harming), nāda (music), and dhyana (meditation). It also emphasizes animal rights, veganism, environmentalism, [2] and social activism. [3]
Jivamukti Yoga was co-founded in New York in 1984 by dancer and musician Sharon Gannon and her partner, artist and cafe owner David Life. [4] Gannon and Life met in 1982 in Manhattan. In 1986 they traveled together to India and took the Sivananda teacher training program and met Swami Nirmalananda [confusion, the Swami Nirmalanda linked died in 1938]. Upon their return, they opened the first Jivamukti Yoga Society in the East Village of New York City. [5] In 1990 they began to practice Ashtanga Yoga with Pattabhi Jois in Mysore, India. In 1993, in upstate New York, they met yoga scholar and ashram founder Shri Brahmananda Sarasvati (Yogi Mishra). In 1998, having become "wildly successful", the yoga center moved to a 9,000 square feet (840 m2) studio on Lafayette Street; some 400 people subscribed, annual membership at that time costing $1200, rather more than a typical gym. [6] It was the largest yoga center in the city, with a wealthy and fashionably-dressed clientele. [7]
The journalist and author Stefanie Syman ascribes Jivamukti's "surprisingly profitable" business with its merger of "overt spirituality, the chanting, the deities, and the sacred music and vigorous asana classes" to the culture at that moment in history, comparable to America of the late 1910s and early 1920s. [6] In 2000, Jivamukti opened a second center on the Upper East Side. [2] [8] In 2003, senior Jivamukti students Patrick Broome and Gabriela Bozic opened Jivamukti Munich, the first Jivamukti Yoga Center outside of New York City. In 2006, the Jivamukti Yoga School NYC relocated their main headquarters to an environmentally constructed studio in Union Square. Jivamukti Yoga has developed a reputation as the chosen yoga style of many celebrities. [9] [7]
The name Jivamukti is an adaptation of the Sanskrit जीवन्मुक्ति jīvanmukti , where jiva is the individual living soul, and mukti – like moksa – is liberation from the cycle of death and rebirth. Thus the Jivamukti method is "liberation while living". [10]
There are five main tenets of the Jivamukti method. These are Shastra, Bhakti, Ahimsa, Nāda, and Dhyana. [11]
There are main centers in the United States, Germany, Spain, Norway, Australia, Russia, and Mexico, and affiliate centers in several other countries. [8] In 2003, the Jivamukti Yoga School NYC established a 125-acre nature preserve in the Catskill Mountains, near Woodstock, New York. Known as the Wild Woodstock Jivamukti Forest Sanctuary, it serves as the country ashram for the Jivamukti Yoga School and a safe haven and unpolluted habitat for diverse plant and animal species. [13]
In 2016, accusations of sexual harassment were made public against one of Jivamukti Yoga School's most senior teachers, Ruth Lauer-Manenti, by one of her female students. The student's lawsuit was settled for an undisclosed amount. Author Michelle Goldberg questioned in Slate magazine whether Jivamukti was a workplace, an ashram, or a cult, with a culture of spiritual abuse and secrecy. [14] [15] That same year, author and yoga teacher Matthew Remski reported, based on interviews with former employees of Jivamukti, that Jivamukti Yoga School NYC used non-disclosure agreements and cash payments to prevent discussion of the school's culture. [16]