LGM-35 Sentinel

Last updated

LGM-35A Sentinel
LGM-35A Render.png
Concept rendering of the LGM-35A
Type Intercontinental ballistic missile
Place of origin United States
Service history
In service2030 or later [1]
Used byUnited States
Production history
Manufacturer Northrop Grumman
Specifications
Warhead W87 mod 0 thermonuclear warhead (300 kilotons of TNT (1,300 TJ))
W87 mod 1 thermonuclear warhead (475 kilotons of TNT (1,990 TJ)) [2]
Detonation
mechanism
Ground-burst and/or air-burst fusing modes
Engine Three-stage solid-fuel rocket
Launch
platform
 Missile silo

The LGM-35 Sentinel, also known as the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD), is a future American land-based intercontinental ballistic missile system (ICBM) currently in the early stages of development. [3] [4] It is slated to replace all 450 Minuteman III missiles from 2029 through 2075. The Minuteman missiles are currently stationed in North Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, and Nebraska. [3] [5]

Contents

In 2020 the Department of the Air Force awarded defense contractor Northrop Grumman a $13.3 billion sole-source contract for development of the LGM-35 after Boeing withdrew its proposal. Northrop Grumman's subcontractors on the LGM-35 include Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Bechtel, Honeywell, Aerojet Rocketdyne, Parsons, Textron, and others. [6] [7] [8]

On January 19, 2024, the USAF announced that the program’s costs had risen to over $125 billion—37% above the initial $95.3 billion budget—and its deployment would be delayed by two years. [1] [9] A revised cost estimate released by the Department of Defense on July 8, 2024, put total program acquisition costs for the Sentinel program at $140.9 billion. [10]

The United States Air Force plans to procure 634 Sentinel missiles, plus an additional 25 missiles to support development and testing, to enable the deployment of 400 missiles. According to the Air Force, the program also includes modernizing "450 silos and more than 600 facilities across almost 40,000 square miles". [11]

Name

According to the United States Air Force website, [12] the L in LGM is the Department of Defense designation for silo-launched; G means surface attack; and "M" stands for guided missile.

History

In 2010, the ICBM Coalition, legislators from states that house nuclear missiles, told President Obama they would not support ratification of the New START treaty with Russia unless Obama agreed to revamp the US nuclear triad: nuclear weapons that could be launched from land, sea, and air. [13] In a written statement, President Obama agreed to "modernize or replace" all three legs of the triad. [6]

A request for proposal for development and maintenance of a next-generation nuclear ICBM was made by the US Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center in July 2016. The GBSD would replace the Minuteman III, which was first deployed in 1970, in the land-based portion of the US nuclear triad. [14] The new missiles, to be phased in over a decade from the late 2020s, are estimated over a fifty-year life cycle to cost around $264 billion. [6] Boeing and Northrop Grumman competed for the contract. [15]

In August 2017, the Air Force awarded three-year development contracts to Boeing and Northrop Grumman for $349 million and $329 million, respectively. [16] One of these companies was to be selected to produce a ground-based nuclear ICBM in 2020. The GBSD program was initially expected to enter service in 2029 and remain active until 2075. [17]

On 25 July 2019, Boeing announced it would not place a bid for the program, citing Northrop's recent acquisition of Orbital ATK (now Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems), Boeing's supplier of solid rocket motors. Northrop signed an agreement to firewall Boeing's proprietary data after acquiring Orbital ATK. [18] The Air Force subsequently halted funding for the Boeing project, leaving Northrop Grumman as the sole bidder for the contract by October 2019. [19]

In December 2019, it was announced that Northrop Grumman won the competition to build the future ICBM. Northrop won by default, as their bid was the only one left to be considered for the GBSD program. The Air Force said that they would "proceed with an aggressive and effective sole-source negotiation" in reference to Northrop's bid. [20]

On 8 September 2020, the Department of the Air Force awarded Northrop Grumman a $13.3 billion contract to develop the GBSD intercontinental ballistic missile. [21] Work on the GBSD missiles will be done in Roy and Promontory, Utah; Huntsville and Montgomery, Alabama; Colorado Springs, Colorado; Bellevue, Nebraska; San Diego and Woodland Hills, California; Vandenberg Space Force Base, California; Chandler, Arizona; Annapolis Junction, Maryland; and other locations. [22] [7]

In April 2022, the GBSD's official designation was announced: The LGM-35A Sentinel. [23] In April 2023, the USAF formally began seeking vendor information preliminary to issuing a request for proposal (RFP) for the Next-generation reentry vehicle (NGRV). [24]

Delays and overcosts

On January 19, 2024, the USAF announced that the LGM-35A Sentinel program will exceed its original budget estimate of $95.3 billion by at least 37%, pushing the total cost to over $125 billion, and the service entry will be delayed by two years. [1] This estimate was raised to $140.9 billion in July 2024 following a Nunn-McCurdy review. [10] The Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC) has risen from an estimated $118 million per missile in 2020 to approximately $162 million as of December 2023. This increase is primarily due to rising costs in command and control systems and missile silo infrastructure.

Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall, speaking at a Washington, DC think tank in November 2023, explained that the program had encountered "unknown unknowns" and was due for a "re-baseline." He noted, "As we get more into the program, as we understand more deeply what we're actually going to have to do, we're finding some things that are going to cost money. There's no question about that." [9]

Warhead

In March 2019, the W87 Mod 1 (W87-1) thermonuclear warhead was selected for GBSD, replacing the W78 warhead currently used on the Minuteman III. [2] It was planned for GBSD to deploy in 2028, with W87-0 warheads initially being fitted to the system and W87-1 warheads being fitted from 2030 onward. This affords the Air Force a small amount of flexibility if the W87-1 is delayed. [25]

The completion of the first plutonium pit for the W87-1 was announced in October 2024 by the National Nuclear Security Administration, after a 35-year-long hiatus. [26]

The Air Force intends to deploy a single warhead on each missile. [5] The Congressional Research Service notes that the high throw-weight of the missile could provide options for it to carry several MIRVs or penetration aids at a future time, if prospective enemies develop credible anti-ballistic missile defenses. [5]

Testing

GBSD testing would occur mainly at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, and at Vandenberg Space Force Base (VSFB), California, with missile launches from VSFB over the Pacific Ocean. Additional testing would be conducted at U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, U.S. Army Garrison–Kwajalein Atoll and within the territorial waters of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. [27]

On 7 July 2022, [28] a Minotaur II+ rocket launched from Vandenberg TP-01 for a suborbital reentry vehicle (Mk21A reentry vehicle belonging to AFNWC) demonstration mission for the future LGM-35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile. [29]

Debate

Pro

Supporters of the GBSD include the Heritage Foundation, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, former Secretary of Defense Ash Carter and members of Congress in the "ICBM Coalition." [30] [31] They argue that the current ICBMs, first introduced in the 1970s, have had their life extended long enough and need to be replaced with a modular system in which components are easier to replace or update. In defending the importance of land-based missiles, supporters say they are the least expensive leg of the nuclear triad because they do not necessitate large maintenance crews or incur expensive refueling costs, like nuclear-powered submarines. Additionally, they argue land-based missiles are visible reminders that the US can strike back in the event of a nuclear attack, thus making them essential to nuclear deterrence. [32]

In its annual 2021 Threat Assessment, the US Intelligence community said China was planning to double its arsenal of nuclear weapons over the next ten years in "the most rapid expansion in its history." It also warned that Russia may expand and modernize its nuclear arsenal. [33]

One of the main supporters of the GBSD is Senator Jon Tester (D-MT), Chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense. In a March 21, 2021, interview with Defense News, Tester said, "As of right now, I think it's important that we move forward with the GBSD because I believe there's still an important deterrent." [34] Jennifer Granholm, Secretary of Energy in the Biden administration, told the press on April 9, 2021, "We have to keep and maintain the stockpile to make sure that it is safe and effective, and we will continue to do that to ensure that we can deter nuclear aggression from other countries." [35]

Con

GBSD critics include former Secretary of Defense William Perry; the late Daniel Ellsberg, Pentagon Papers whistleblower and author of The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner; [36] [37] the Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL); the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS); the Federation of American Scientists (FAS); and Peace Action. They argue that the new missiles would be not only costly, but also dangerous, increasing the risk of accidentally launching a nuclear war. [38] Critics say that the targeting of ICBM silos, which are supposed to act like a sponge drawing nuclear weapons to deplete Russia's nuclear power, could result in the deaths of more than 10 million people. [3] Ellsberg and author Norman Solomon argue that peace groups must oppose not only the GBSD but also the entire land-based leg of the nuclear triad to reduce the threat of an accidental nuclear war. [39]

Physicist David Wright, former co-director of the UCS Global Security Program, in his report Rethinking Land-Based Nuclear Missiles, writes that submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) are as accurate, if not more, than land-based missiles, and are "virtually undetectable," making the ICBMs not only obsolete but also sitting ducks in the five states that house ICBMs. [40] Wright concludes that the vulnerability of ICBMs has prompted the Air Force to keep them on high alert, which is dangerous and could trigger a nuclear war. [40] According to William Hartung, author of Prophets of War: Lockheed Martin and the Making of the Military-Industrial Complex, a president would have only minutes to decide whether to launch ICBMs in a crisis so that the missiles would not be destroyed in a first strike. [41]

Polling

In 2020, the Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland, issued a report entitled Common Ground of the American People, which was a compilation of studies conducted over the previous five years, collecting data from nearly 86,000 individuals who were polled on the GBSD. Sixty-one percent of Americans–including both Democratic and Republican majorities–said they supported phasing out the United States' 400 land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles. [42]

Another 2020 poll conducted by the Federation of American Scientists and ReThink Media found a majority of both Republicans and Democrats favored alternative solutions to the GBSD, including extending the life of the Minuteman III ICBM. Over 800 registered voters were surveyed, with an oversampling of 200 registered voters in ICBM states: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska and Wyoming. When respondents were asked, "What do you think the government should do about ICBMs?", 30 percent favored updating existing ICBMs rather than replacing them, 26 percent supported the GBSD, 20 percent preferred eliminating the ICBMs and 10 percent supported abolishing all nuclear weapons. [43]

According to a 2021 survey commissioned by the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, an organization funded by the top weapons manufacturers, [44] the majority of voters believe that nuclear deterrence capability should be one of the highest priorities for the Department of Defense, with a majority also supporting modernization efforts. [45] The survey asked more than 2,000 voters for their views on national security and nuclear arms. Eighty-one percent of survey respondents preferred the security benefits of the United States' ground-based nuclear capabilities more than the cost savings of removing these capabilities. When told the current Minuteman III ICBM system is over 50 years old, the majority of respondents said the ICBMs should be replaced by a modern system, compared to 23 percent who said the ICBMs should be refurbished to extend their current life. Just five percent indicated an opinion that they should be eliminated entirely. When informed that Russia and China have modernized their nuclear arsenals, support for replacing Minuteman III with a modern ICBM system rose to 65 percent, compared to only 15 percent in favor of refurbishing. [46]

ICBM Coalition

The ICBM Coalition in Congress, which lobbies for the GBSD, was able to limit the reduction of deployed land-based missiles to 50 in the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START). [47] As of May 2021, membership in the coalition included senators from states that will either house or develop the proposed GBSD missiles: Co-Chair, Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND); Co-Chair, Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT); Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY); Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT); Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT); Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD). [48]

Tester serves as Chair of the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee. During a spring 2021 event hosted by the Washington, D.C.–based Advanced Nuclear Weapons Alliance, Tester said he was committed to keeping the GBSD "on track" though added there will be debate about the proposed new missiles during the 2022 defense appropriations process. [49]

According to the Arms Control Association, Caucus Senators received the following contributions from military contractors from 2012-2020: Romney ($645,000); Tester ($102,360); Barasso ($89,000); Daines ($85,948); Enzi ($68,500); Cramer ($49,593). In total, military contractors have donated $1.2 million to the current members of the Senate ICBM Coalition and more than $15 million to the 64 members of the influential committees, the Senate and House Armed Services strategic forces subcommittees and the Senate and House Appropriations defense subcommittees, that can decide the fate of ICBM legislation. ICBM contractors are also engaged in lobbying representatives in Congress, with corporate backers of GBSD employing 380 lobbyists, according to the Arms Control Association. [47]

See also

Similar weapons

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGM-30 Minuteman</span> American ICBM, in service

The LGM-30 Minuteman is an American land-based intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) in service with the Air Force Global Strike Command. As of 2024, the LGM-30G is the only land-based ICBM in service in the United States and represents the land leg of the U.S. nuclear triad, along with the Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) and nuclear weapons carried by long-range strategic bombers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle</span> Ballistic missile payload containing multiple warheads which are independently targetable

A multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) is an exoatmospheric ballistic missile payload containing several warheads, each capable of being aimed to hit a different target. The concept is almost invariably associated with intercontinental ballistic missiles carrying thermonuclear warheads, even if not strictly being limited to them. An intermediate case is the multiple reentry vehicle (MRV) missile which carries several warheads which are dispersed but not individually aimed. All nuclear-weapon states except Pakistan and North Korea are currently confirmed to have deployed MIRV missile systems. Israel is suspected to possess or be in the process of developing MIRVs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGM-118 Peacekeeper</span> Intercontinental ballistic missile

The LGM-118 Peacekeeper, originally known as the MX for "Missile, Experimental", was a MIRV-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) produced and deployed by the United States from 1985 to 2005. The missile could carry up to eleven Mark 21 reentry vehicles, each armed with a 300-kiloton W87 warhead. Initial plans called for building and deploying 100 MX ICBMs, but budgetary concerns limited the final procurement; only 50 entered service. Disarmament treaties signed after the Peacekeeper's development led to its withdrawal from service in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">W78</span> American thermonuclear warhead

The W78 is an American thermonuclear warhead with an estimated yield of 335–350 kilotonnes of TNT (1,400–1,460 TJ), deployed on the LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and housed in the Mark 12A reentry vehicle. Minuteman III initially carried the older W62 warhead with a yield of 170 kilotonnes of TNT (710 TJ), but starting in December 1979 and ending in February 1982, some W62 were replaced with the W78. It is publicly estimated that 1083 warheads were manufactured.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">W87</span> American thermonuclear missile warhead

The W87 is an American thermonuclear missile warhead formerly deployed on the LGM-118A Peacekeeper ("MX") ICBM. 50 MX missiles were built, each carrying up to 10 W87 warheads in multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV), and were deployed from 1986 to 2005. Starting in 2007, 250 of the W87 warheads from retired Peacekeeper missiles were retrofitted onto much older Minuteman III missiles, with one warhead per missile. An upgraded version is planned for use on the forthcoming LGM-35A Sentinel ICBM.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear triad</span> Set of three types of nuclear-strike weapons

A nuclear triad is a three-pronged military force structure of land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and strategic bombers with nuclear bombs and missiles. Countries build nuclear triads to eliminate an enemy's ability to destroy a nation's nuclear forces in a first-strike attack, which preserves their own ability to launch a second strike and therefore increases their nuclear deterrence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">341st Missile Wing</span> US Air Force unit

The United States Air Force's 341st Missile Wing is an intercontinental ballistic missile unit headquartered at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. Up until 1 July 2008, it was designated as the 341st Space Wing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">10th Missile Squadron</span> US Air Force unit

The 10th Missile Squadron is a United States Air Force unit. It is assigned to the 341st Operations Group, stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. The squadron is equipped with the LGM-30G Minuteman III Intercontinental ballistic missile, with a mission of nuclear deterrence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">12th Missile Squadron</span> US Air Force unit

The 12th Missile Squadron is a United States Air Force unit. It is assigned to the 341st Operations Group, stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. The squadron is equipped with the LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile, with a mission of nuclear deterrence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air Force Global Strike Command</span> Major command of the United States Air Force responsible for strategic and nuclear forces

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) is a Major Command (MAJCOM) of the United States Air Force, headquartered at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana. AFGSC provides combat-ready forces to conduct strategic nuclear deterrence and global strike operations in support of combatant commanders. Air Force Global Strike Command is the Air Force's service component to the United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">319th Missile Squadron</span> US Air Force unit

The 319th Missile Squadron is a United States Air Force unit assigned to the 90th Operations Group at Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming. The squadron is equipped with the LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile, with a mission of nuclear deterrence. It is the flagship squadron of the 90th Missile Wing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Airborne Launch Control System</span> US Strategic Command platform for survivable launch control system for ballistic missile force

The Airborne Launch Control System (ALCS) provides a survivable launch capability for the United States Air Force's LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) force. The ALCS is operated by airborne missileers from Air Force Global Strike Command's (AFGSC) 625th Strategic Operations Squadron (STOS) and United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM). The system is located on board the United States Navy's E-6B Mercury, which serves as USSTRATCOM's "Looking Glass" Airborne Command Post (ABNCP). The ALCS crew is integrated into the ABNCP battle staff and is on alert around the clock.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Missile launch facility</span> Underground structure for the storage and launching of intercontinental ballistic missiles

A missile launch facility, also known as an underground missile silo, launch facility (LF), or nuclear silo, is a vertical cylindrical structure constructed underground, for the storage and launching of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs). Similar facilities can be used for anti-ballistic missiles (ABMs).

A missile combat crew (MCC), is a team of highly trained specialists, often called missilemen, or missileers, staffing Intermediate Range and Intercontinental ballistic missile systems. In the United States, personnel, officially coded as Nuclear and Missile Operations Officers, of the United States Air Force, operate underground missile systems at launch control centers located throughout the country. There are also a select few missileers that have the chance to become part of a Missile Combat Crew-Airborne (MCC-A) operating the Airborne Launch Control System which provides a survivable launch capability for the Minuteman ICBM force. Crew size varies among the different missile systems, but the number is always greater than one, to abide by USSTRATCOM's two-man rule for positive control of nuclear weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peacekeeper Rail Garrison</span> United States Air Force railcar-launched ICBM

The Peacekeeper Rail Garrison was a railcar-launched ICBM that was developed by the United States Air Force during the 1980s as part of a plan to place fifty MGM-118A Peacekeeper intercontinental ballistic missiles on the rail network of the United States. The railcars were intended, in case of increased threat of nuclear war, to be deployed onto the nation's rail network to avoid being destroyed by a first strike counterforce attack by the Soviet Union. However, the plan was canceled as part of defense cutbacks following the end of the Cold War, and the Peacekeeper missiles were installed in silo launchers as LGM-118s instead.

The ZBGM-75 Advanced Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, also known as Weapons System 120A (WS-120A), was a program to develop an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), proposed by the United States Air Force in the 1960s as a replacement for the LGM-30 Minuteman as the Air Force's standard ICBM. Funding was not allocated for the program and the project was cancelled in 1967.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">STRAT-X</span> U.S. government-sponsored study

STRAT-X, or Strategic-Experimental, was a U.S. government-sponsored study conducted during 1966 and 1967 that comprehensively analyzed the potential future of the U.S. nuclear deterrent force. At the time, the Soviet Union was making significant strides in nuclear weapons delivery, and also constructing anti-ballistic missile defenses to protect strategic facilities. To address a potential technological gap between the two superpowers, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara entrusted the classified STRAT-X study to the Institute for Defense Analyses, which compiled a twenty-volume report in nine months. The report looked into more than one hundred different weapons systems, ultimately resulting in the MGM-134 Midgetman and LGM-118 Peacekeeper intercontinental ballistic missiles, the Ohio-class submarines, and the Trident submarine-launched ballistic missiles, among others. Journalists have regarded STRAT-X as a major influence on the course of U.S. nuclear policy.

The RS-26 Rubezh, designated by NATO as SS-X-31, is a Russian solid-fueled intermediate-range ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead, of which the range bracket just barely classifies it as an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It is equipped with a thermonuclear MIRV or MaRV payload, and is also intended to be capable of carrying the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle. The RS-26 is based on RS-24 Yars, and constitutes a shorter version of the RS-24 with one fewer stages. The development process of the RS-26 has been largely comparable to that of the RSD-10 Pioneer, a shortened derivative of the RT-21 Temp 2S. Deployment of the RS-26 is speculated to have a similar strategic impact as the RSD-10.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Tirpak, John A. (22 January 2024). "New ICBM Has 'Critical' Cost and Schedule Overruns, Needs SecDef Certification to Continue". Air&Space Forces Magazine. Air & Space Forces Association. Archived from the original on 21 January 2024. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
  2. 1 2 "W87-1 Modification Program" (PDF). 8 March 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 December 2019. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 Eaves, Elisabeth (8 February 2021). "Why is America getting a new $100 billion nuclear weapon?". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Archived from the original on 20 February 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  4. ↑ "Air Force's new intercontinental ballistic missile system has a name: Sentinel". Air Force. 5 April 2022. Archived from the original on 5 April 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 Johnson, Benji (10 November 2020). "Ground Based Strategic Deterrent". Congressional Research Service. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 November 2020.
  6. 1 2 3 Kaplan, Fred (10 March 2021). "It's Time for Biden to Stand Up to Tom Cotton and the Congressional Missile Caucus". Slate Magazine. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  7. 1 2 "Ground Based Strategic Deterrent". Bechtel Corporate. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  8. ↑ "Northrop Grumman selects subcontractors for new ICBM missile system". UPI. 16 September 2019. Archived from the original on 19 May 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
  9. 1 2 Rosenberg, Zach (22 January 2024). "LGM-35A Sentinel missile cost climbs, schedule slips". Janes . Archived from the original on 24 May 2024. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
  10. 1 2 "Department of Defense Announces Results of Sentinel Nunn-McCurdy Review". United States Department of Defense . 8 July 2024. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
  11. ↑ Defense Primer: LGM-35A Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
  12. ↑ "LGM-30G Minuteman III". U.S. Air Force. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023.
  13. ↑ Hewitt, Kate (17 January 2019). "Experts discuss the politics of New START and strategic nuclear modernization". Brookings. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  14. ↑ "Boeing Ready to Design Next Generation of US Nuclear Missiles". Space Daily. 4 August 2016. Archived from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  15. ↑ Watkins, Thomas (25 September 2016). "US Air Force set to replace intercontinental nuke arsenal". Space Daily. Archived from the original on 28 September 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  16. ↑ Gregg, Aaron (22 August 2017). "Pentagon narrows competition for the next big U.S. nuclear missile deterrent". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 24 April 2020. Retrieved 7 January 2024.
  17. ↑ Carlson, Stephen (22 August 2017). "Boeing, Northrop Grumman receive development contracts for new ICBM". Space Daily. Archived from the original on 23 August 2017. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  18. ↑ Weisgerber, Marcus (25 July 2019). "Boeing: $85B Competition to Build New ICBMs Favors Northrop Grumman". Defense One. Archived from the original on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 8 August 2019.
  19. ↑ Gregg, Aaron (22 October 2019). "Air Force halts funding for Boeing's ballistic missile replacement". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 8 August 2022.
  20. ↑ Erwin, Sandra (14 December 2019). "Northrop Grumman wins competition to build future ICBM, by default". Space News. Archived from the original on 17 December 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2019.
  21. ↑ Erwin, Sandra (8 September 2020). "Northrop Grumman receives $13.3 billion contract to develop next-generation ICBM". Space News. Archived from the original on 1 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  22. ↑ "Northrop Grumman to design next-generation intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) in $13.3 billion deal". Military Aerospace. 9 September 2020. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  23. ↑ "Air Force's new intercontinental ballistic missile system has a name: Sentinel". U.S. Air Force. 5 April 2022. Archived from the original on 5 April 2022. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  24. ↑ Marrow, Michael (7 April 2023). "Air Force seeks industry input for next-gen ICBM reentry vehicle". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 3 November 2023.
  25. ↑ Klotz, Frank G.; Evans, Alexandra T. (2022). "Modernizing the U.S. Nuclear Triad: The Rationale for a New Intercontinental Ballistic Missile" (PDF). RAND Corporation. p. 21. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 February 2022. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  26. ↑ "NNSA completes and diamond-stamps first plutonium pit for W87-1 warhead". National Nuclear Security Administration . 2 October 2024. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  27. ↑ "Air Force releases environmental study on Ground Based Strategic Deterrent ICBM recapitali". U.S. Air Force. 19 February 2021. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  28. ↑ Scully, Janene (7 July 2022). "Missile Test Ends in Explosion Seconds After Launch from Vandenberg SFB". Noozhawk . Archived from the original on 7 July 2022. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
  29. ↑ Martinez-Pogue, Jade (6 July 2022). "Test rocket launch scheduled from Vandenberg Space Force Base Thursday morning". KEYT-TV . Archived from the original on 6 July 2022. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
  30. ↑ "Senate Coalition Highlights Value of America's Nuclear Missiles | U.S. Senator John Hoeven of North Dakota". www.hoeven.senate.gov. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  31. ↑ "Supporting Voices: Nuclear Triad". Northrop Grumman. 20 December 2019. Archived from the original on 2 October 2023. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  32. ↑ Morrison, Tim (20 January 2021). "The Case for Modernization". Real Clear Defense. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  33. ↑ Ignatius, David (6 May 2021). "Opinion | The wizards of Armageddon may be back". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on 22 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  34. ↑ Gould, Joe (1 March 2021). "New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks". Defense News. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  35. ↑ Demarest, Colin (8 April 2021). "Modernization of U.S. nuclear weapons is a must, energy secretary says at White House". Post and Courier. Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  36. ↑ "BOOK REVIEW: Daniel Ellsberg's Essential Truths About Our Nuclear Age | Arms Control Association". www.armscontrol.org. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  37. ↑ Kaplan, Fred (4 December 2017). "Daniel Ellsberg's Memoir About Life as a Nuclear War Planner Would Be Terrifying Even if Trump Weren't President". Slate Magazine. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  38. ↑ Ohlbaum, Diana (4 May 2021). "Cancel the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent". Friends Committee On National Legislation. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  39. ↑ Ellsberg, Daniel; Solomon, Norman (16 October 2021). "To Avoid Armageddon, Don't Modernize Missiles—Eliminate Them". The Nation. ISSN   0027-8378. Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  40. 1 2 "ICBMs are unnecessary, according to Union of Concerned Scientists". Union of Concerned Scientists. 22 June 2020. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  41. ↑ Hartung, William D. (14 April 2020). "Now isn't the time to push for nuclear modernization". Defense News. Archived from the original on 21 April 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2021.
  42. ↑ Korda, Matt (12 August 2020). "Democrats And Republicans Agree: Phase Out Land-Based Nuclear Missiles". Forbes. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  43. ↑ Mehta, Aaron (5 February 2021). "Majority of voters support ICBM replacement alternatives, new poll finds". Defense News. Archived from the original on 7 February 2021. Retrieved 13 May 2021.
  44. ↑ "Our Supporters". Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. Archived from the original on 30 March 2023. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
  45. ↑ Gunzinger, Kamilla (15 September 2021). "Understanding American Voters' Sentiment on Strategic Nuclear Deterrence". Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. Archived from the original on 14 February 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  46. ↑ Hadley, Greg (15 September 2021). "Survey Finds Broad Public Support for Nuclear Deterrence, Modernization". Air & Space Forces Magazine. Archived from the original on 6 August 2023. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  47. 1 2 "Inside the ICBM Lobby: Special Interests Or the National Interest? | Arms Control Association". www.armscontrol.org. Archived from the original on 19 May 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
  48. ↑ "Senate ICBM Coalition - Summary from LegiStorm". www.legistorm.com. Retrieved 20 May 2021.
  49. ↑ Leone, Dan (2 April 2021). "Tester Says He Will Keep GBSD "On Track;" Ex-Obama Official Says GBSD 'Vulnerable'". ExchangeMonitor. Archived from the original on 19 May 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.