FGM-148 Javelin

Last updated

FGM-148 Javelin
Javelin with checkout equipment.jpg
An assembled FGM-148 Javelin launcher
Type Anti-tank missile
Place of originUnited States
Service history
In service1996–present
Used bySee Operators
Production history
Designer Texas Instruments & Martin Marietta (now Raytheon Technologies & Lockheed Martin)
DesignedJune 1989
ManufacturerRaytheon & Lockheed Martin
Unit costUS$216,717 (G-model missile only, FY2021) [6]
US$240,000 (missile only, export cost, FY2019) [7]
US$249,700 (Lightweight CLU only, FY2021) [6]
No. built45,000 missiles (12,000 CLUs) [8]
VariantsSee: § Variants
  • 22.3 kg (49 lb), ready to fire
  • 6.4 kg (14 lb), detachable CLU [9] [10]
  • 15.9 kg (35 lb), missile in launch tube
Length1.1 m (43 in) (missile)
Barrel  length1.2 m (47 in)
Diameter127 mm (5.0 in)
Crew1 or 2

Calibre 127 mm (5.0 in)
Effective firing range
  • Original CLU: 2,500 m (1.6 mi)
  • Lightweight CLU: 4,000 m (2.5 mi) [11]
  • From vehicle: 4,750 m (2.95 mi) [12] [13]
Sights Optical sight & thermal imaging
WarheadTandem-charge HEAT
Warhead weight8.4 kg (19 lb) [14]
Contact fuze
Blast yield
  • Penetration:
  • Classified.
  • 30 in (760 mm)  RHA

Flight ceiling150 m (490 ft) (top attack mode)
60 m (200 ft) (direct attack mode)
Infrared homing
Man-portable launcher

The FGM-148 Javelin, or Advanced Anti-Tank Weapon System-Medium (AAWS-M), is an American-made man-portable anti-tank system in service since 1996, and continuously upgraded. It replaced the M47 Dragon anti-tank missile in US service. [10] Its fire-and-forget design uses automatic infrared guidance that allows the user to seek cover immediately after launch, in contrast to wire-guided systems, like the system used by the Dragon, which require a user to guide the weapon throughout the engagement. The Javelin's high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warhead can defeat modern tanks by top attack, hitting them from above, where their armor is thinnest, and is also useful against fortifications in a direct attack flight.


As of 2019, according to claims by the manufacturer, the Javelin had been used in around 5,000 successful engagements. [8]


Javelin is a fire-and-forget missile with lock-on before launch and automatic self-guidance. The system takes a top attack flight profile against armored vehicles, attacking the usually thinner top armor, but can also make a direct attack, for use against buildings, targets too close for top attack, targets under obstructions, and helicopters. [10]

It can reach a peak altitude of 150 m (490 ft) in top attack mode and 60 m (200 ft) in direct attack mode. Initial versions had a range of 2,000 m (6,600 ft), later increased to 2,500 m (8,200 ft). It is equipped with an imaging infrared seeker. The tandem warhead is fitted with two shaped charges: a precursor warhead to detonate any explosive reactive armor and a primary warhead to penetrate base armor.

The missile is ejected from the launcher to a safe distance from the operator before the main rocket motors ignite  a "soft launch arrangement". [16] This makes it harder to identify the launcher, though backblast from the launch tube still poses a hazard to nearby personnel. The firing team may move as soon as the "fire-and-forget" missile has been launched, or immediately prepare to fire on their next target. [14]

The missile system is sometimes carried by two soldiers consisting of a gunner and an ammunition bearer, although one soldier can fire it. While the gunner aims and fires the missile, the ammunition bearer scans for prospective targets, watches for threats like enemy vehicles or troops and ensures that personnel and obstacles are clear of the missile's launch backblast.


In 1983, the United States Army introduced its AAWS-M (Advanced Anti-Tank Weapon System—Medium) requirement and, in 1985, the AAWS-M was approved for development. In August 1986, the proof-of-principle (POP) phase of development began, with a US$30 million contract awarded for technical proof demonstrators: Ford Aerospace (laser-beam riding), Hughes Aircraft Missile System Group (imaging infrared combined with a fiber-optic cable link) and Texas Instruments (imaging infrared). [17] In late 1988, the POP phase ended and, in June 1989, the full-scale development contract was awarded to a joint venture of Texas Instruments and Martin Marietta (now Raytheon and Lockheed Martin). The AAWS-M received the designation of FGM-148.

External images
AAWS-M Candidates Fact Sheets
Searchtool.svg Texas Instruments
Searchtool.svg Hughes Aircraft
Searchtool.svg Ford Aerospace

In April 1991, the first test-flight of the Javelin succeeded, and in March 1993, the first test-firing from the launcher succeeded. In 1994, low levels of production were authorized, [10] and the first Javelins were deployed with US Army units in 1996. [10]

Test and evaluation

Development test and evaluation is conducted to demonstrate the engineering design and development process is complete. It is used to reduce risk, validate, and qualify the design. It also ensures that the product is ready for government acceptance. The DT&E results are evaluated to ensure that design risks have been minimized and the system will meet specifications. Results are also used to estimate the system's military readiness when it is introduced into service. DT&E serves a critical purpose as it reduces the risks of hazards by testing selected high-risk components or subsystems. DT&E is the government developing agency tool used to confirm that the system performs as specified and that the system is ready for field testing.

DT&E is an iterative process of designing, building, testing, identifying deficiencies, fixing, retesting, and repeating. It is performed in the factory, laboratory, and on the proving ground by the contractors and the government. Contractor and government testing is combined into one integrated test program and conducted to determine if the performance requirements have been met and to provide data to the decision authority.

The General Accounting Office (GAO), since renamed Government Accountability Office, published a report questioning the adequacy of Javelin testing. The report, titled "Army Acquisition—Javelin Is Not Ready for Multiyear Procurement", opposed entering into full-rate production in 1997 and expressed the need for further operational testing due to the many redesigns undergone.

In 1995, Secretary of Defense William Perry had set forth five new operational test initiatives. These included: 1) getting operational testers involved early in development; 2) use of modeling and simulation; 3) integrating development and operational testing; 4) combining testing and training; and 5) applying concepts to demos and acquisitions.

The late-phase development of the Javelin retroactively benefited from the then new operational test initiatives set forth by the Secretary of Defense, as well as a further test conducted as a consequence of the Army's response to the GAO report. Before the Milestone III decision, and before fielding to 3rd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment at Fort Benning (also Army Rangers, Special Forces, airborne, air assault, and light infantry), the Javelin was subjected to limited parts of the five operational test and evaluation initiatives, as well as a portability operational test program (an additional test phase of the so-called Product Verification Test), [18] which included live firings with the full-rate configuration weapon.

Per initiatives and as a DT&E function, the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) and the Defense Department's Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) became involved in three development test activities, including: 1) reviewing initial operational test and evaluation plans; 2) monitoring initial operational test and evaluation; and 3) structuring follow-on test and evaluation activities. The results of these efforts detected problems (training included) and corrected significant problems which led to modified test plans, savings in test costs, and GAO satisfaction.

Qualification testing

The Javelin Environmental Test System (JETS) is a mobile test set for Javelin All-Up-Round (AUR) and the Command Launch Unit (CLU). It can be configured to functionally test the AUR or the CLU individually or both units in a mated tactical mode. This mobile unit may be repositioned at the various environmental testing facilities. The mobile system is used for all phases of Javelin qualification testing. There is also a non-mobile JETS used for stand-alone CLU testing. This system is equipped with an environmental chamber and is primarily used for Product Verification Testing (PRVT). Capabilities include: Javelin CLU testing; Javelin AUR testing; Javelin Mated Mode testing; Javelin testing in various environmental conditions; and CLU PRVT. [19]

The all-up-round test sets include: extreme temperature testing; missile tracker testing (track rate error, tracking sensitivity); seeker/focal plane array testing (cool-down time, dead/defective pixels, seeker identification); pneumatic leakage; continuity measurements; ready time; and guidance sections (guidance commands, fin movement).


The system consists of three main components: the Command Launch Unit, the Launch Tube Assembly and the missile itself. Each missile contains 250 microprocessors. [20]

Command launch unit

The command launch unit. The larger lens is the night vision sight, and the smaller is the daysight Javelin Firing Positions MOD 45162589.jpg
The command launch unit. The larger lens is the night vision sight, and the smaller is the daysight
The CLU team after firing FGM-148 Javelin - ID 030206-M-5753Q-004.jpg
The CLU team after firing

The gunner carries a reusable command launch unit (CLU, pronounced "clue"), which is the targeting component of the two-part system. The CLU has three views which are used to find, target, and fire the missile and may also be used separately from the missile as a portable thermal sight. Infantry personnel are no longer required to stay in constant contact with armored personnel carriers and tanks with thermal sights. This makes them more flexible and able to perceive threats they would not otherwise be able to detect. In 2006, a contract was awarded to Toyon Research Corporation to begin development of an upgrade to the CLU enabling the transmission of target image and GPS location data to other units. [21]

Day field of view

The first view is a 4× magnification day view. It is mainly used to scan areas in visible light during daylight operation. It is also used to scan immediately before sunrise and after sunset, when it is difficult to focus the thermal image due to the natural rapid heating or cooling of the environment.

Wide field of view

The second view is the 4× magnification night view, a wide field of view (WFOV) which shows the gunner a thermal representation of the area viewed. This is also the primary view used due to its ability to detect infrared radiation and find both troops and vehicles otherwise too well hidden to detect. The screen shows a "green scale" view which can be adjusted in both contrast and brightness. The inside of the CLU is cooled by a small refrigeration unit attached to the sight. This greatly increases the sensitivity of the thermal imaging capability since the temperature inside the sight is much lower than that of the objects it detects.

Due to the sensitivity this causes, the gunner is able to "focus" the CLU to show a detailed image of the area being viewed by showing temperature differences of only a few degrees. The gunner operates this view with the use of two hand stations similar to the control stick found in modern cockpits. It is from this view that the gunner focuses the image and determines the area that gives the best heat signature on which to lock the missile.

Narrow field of view

The third field of view is a 12× thermal sight used to better identify the target vehicle. Once the CLU has been focused in WFOV, the gunner may switch to a narrow field of view (NFOV) for target recognition before activating the seeker FOV.

Once the best target area is chosen, the gunner presses one of the two triggers and is automatically switched to the fourth view; the seeker FOV, which is a 9x magnification thermal view. This process is similar to the automatic zoom feature on most modern cameras. This view is also available along with the previously mentioned views, all of which may be accessed with the press of a button. However, it is not as commonly-used as a high magnification view because it takes longer to scan a wide area.

This view allows the gunner to further aim the missile and set the guidance system housed inside it. It is when in this view that information is passed from the CLU, through the connection electronics of the Launch Tube Assembly, and into the missile's guidance system. If the gunner decides not to fire the missile immediately, they can cycle back to the other views without firing. When the gunner is satisfied with the target picture, a second trigger is pulled to establish a "lock". The missile launches after a short delay.

Lightweight CLU

The US Army developed a new CLU as an improvement over the Block I version. The new CLU is 70% smaller, 40% lighter and has a 50% battery life increase. Features of the lightweight CLU are: a long-wave infrared (IR) thermographic camera; a high-definition display with improved resolution; integrated handgrips; a five megapixel color camera; a laser point that can be seen visibly or through IR; a far target locator using GPS, a laser rangefinder, a heading sensor, and modernized electronics. [22] The LWCLU has also demonstrated the ability to fire a FIM-92 Stinger anti-aircraft missile, using its superior optics to identify and destroy small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). [23]

Javelin fired from Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station-Javelin (CROWS-J) mounted on Stryker, 28 April 2022, Fort Carson 2SBCT-4ID fires Javelin using CROWS-J at FortCarson.jpg
Javelin fired from Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station-Javelin (CROWS-J) mounted on Stryker, 28 April 2022, Fort Carson

The Javelin Joint Venture received its first low-rate production contract for the LWCLU in June 2022. 200 units will be delivered before full-rate production is expected to initiate in 2023, which will increase the production rate to 600 per year. First delivery is slated for 2025. [25]

Launch Tube Assembly

Both the gunner and the ammunition bearer carry the Launch Tube Assembly, a disposable tube that houses the missile and protects the missile from harsh environments. The tube has built-in electronics and a locking hinge system that makes attachment and detachment of the missile to and from the Command Launch Unit a quick and simple process.



Missile components 1-20 Javelin missile.png
Missile components
A Javelin fired by a U.S. soldier in Jordan during Eager Lion 2019 Javelin Fire! (48638261261).jpg
A Javelin fired by a U.S. soldier in Jordan during Eager Lion 2019

The Javelin missile's tandem warhead is a high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) type. [10] This round utilizes an explosive shaped charge to create a stream of superplastically deformed metal formed from trumpet-shaped metallic liners. The result is a narrow high velocity particle stream that can penetrate armor.

The Javelin counters the advent of explosive reactive armor (ERA). ERA boxes or tiles lying over a vehicle's main armor explode when struck by a warhead. This explosion does not harm the vehicle's main armor, but causes steel panels to fly across the path of a HEAT round's narrow particle stream, disrupting its focus and leaving it unable to cut through the main armor. The Javelin uses two shaped-charge warheads in tandem. The weak, smaller diameter HEAT precursor charge detonates the ERA, clearing the way for the much larger diameter HEAT warhead, which then penetrates the target's primary armor.

A two-layered molybdenum liner is used for the precursor and a copper liner for the main warhead.

To protect the main charge from the explosive blast, shock, and debris caused by the impact of the missile's nose and the detonation of the precursor charge, a blast shield is used between the two charges. This was the first composite material blast shield and the first that had a hole through the middle to provide a jet that is less diffuse.

A newer main charge liner produces a higher velocity jet. While making the warhead smaller, this change makes it more effective, leaving more room for propellant for the main rocket motor, and thus increasing the missile's range.

Electronic arming and fusing, called Electronic Safe Arming and Fire (ESAF), is present on the Javelin. The ESAF system enables the firing and arming process to proceed, while imposing a series of safety checks on the missile. ESAF cues the launch motor after the trigger is pulled. When the missile reaches a key acceleration point (indicating that it has cleared the launch tube), the ESAF initiates a second arming signal to fire the flight motor. After another check on missile conditions (target lock check), ESAF initiates final arming to enable the warheads for detonation upon target impact. When the missile strikes the target, ESAF enables the tandem warhead function (provide appropriate time between the detonation of the precursor charge and the detonation of the main charge).

Though the Javelin's tandem HEAT warhead has proven efficient at destroying tanks, most threats it was employed against in Iraq and Afghanistan were weapon crews and teams, buildings, and lightly armored and unarmored vehicles. To make the Javelin more useful in these scenarios, the Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center developed a multi-purpose warhead (MPWH) for the FGM-148F. While it is still lethal against tanks, the new warhead has a naturally fragmenting steel warhead case that doubles the effectiveness against personnel due to enhanced fragmentation. The MPWH does not add weight or cost and has a lighter composite missile mid-body to enable drop-in replacement to existing Javelin tubes. [26] [22] The Javelin F-model was planned to begin deliveries in early 2020; [8] the improved missile design, along with new lighter CLU with an improved target tracker,[ dubious ] entered production in May 2020. [27]


A U.S. soldier firing a Javelin. Javelin of 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade, Exercise Rock Sokol at Pocek Range in Postonja, Slovenia, March 9, 2016.jpg
A U.S. soldier firing a Javelin.

Most rocket launchers require a large clear area behind the gunner to prevent injury from backblast. To address this shortcoming without increasing recoil to an unacceptable level, the Javelin system uses a soft launch mechanism. A small launch motor using conventional rocket propellant ejects the missile from the launcher, but stops burning before the missile clears the tube. The flight motor is ignited after a delay to allow sufficient clearance from the operator.

To save weight, the two motors are integrated with a burst disc between them. It is designed to tolerate the pressure of the launch motor from one side, but to easily rupture from the other when the flight motor ignites. The motors use a common nozzle, with the flight motor's exhaust flowing through the expended launch motor. Because the launch motor casing remains in place, an unusual annular (ring-shaped) igniter is used to start it. A normal igniter would be blown out of the back of the missile when the flight motor ignited and could injure the operator.

Since the launch motor uses a standard NATO propellant, the presence of lead beta-resorcylate as a burn rate modifier causes an amount of lead and lead oxide to be present in the exhaust; gunners are asked to hold their breath after firing for their safety.[ citation needed ]

In the event that the launch motor malfunctions and the launch tube is overpressurized—for example, if the rocket gets stuck—the Javelin missile includes a pressure release system to prevent the launcher from exploding. The launch motor is held in place by a set of shear pins, which fracture if the pressure rises too high, and allow the motor to be pushed out of the back of the tube.


As a fire-and-forget missile, after launch the missile has to be able to track and destroy its target without assistance from the gunner. This is done by coupling an onboard imaging IR system (separate from CLU imaging system) with an onboard tracking system.

The gunner uses the CLU's IR system to find and identify the target, then switches to the missile's independent IR system to set a track box around the target and establish a lock. The gunner places brackets around the image for locking.

The seeker stays focused on the target's image, continuing to track it as the target moves or the missile's flight path alters, or attack angles change. The seeker consists of three main components: focal plane array image sensor, cooling and calibration, and stabilization.

Focal plane array (FPA)

The seeker assembly is encased in a dome that is transparent to long-wave infrared radiation. The IR radiation passes through the dome and then through lenses that focus the energy. The IR energy is reflected by mirrors on to the FPA. The seeker is a two-dimensional staring FPA of 64×64 MerCad (HgCdTe) detector elements. [28] The FPA processes the signals from the detectors and relays a signal to the missile's tracker.

The staring array is a photo-voltaic device where the incident photons stimulate electrons and are stored, pixel by pixel, in readout integrated circuits attached at the rear of the detector. These electrons are converted to voltages that are multiplexed out of the ROIC on a frame-by-frame basis.


To function effectively, the FPA must be cooled and calibrated. In other applications, a CLU's IR detectors are cooled using a Dewar flask and a closed-cycle Stirling engine, but there is insufficient space in the missile for a similar solution. Prior to launch, a cooler mounted on the outside of the launch tube activates the electrical systems in the missile and supplies cold gas from a Joule-Thomson expander to the missile detector assembly while the missile is still in the launch tube. When the missile is fired, this external connection is broken and coolant gas is supplied internally by an onboard argon gas bottle. The gas is held in a small bottle at high pressure and contains enough coolant for the duration of the flight of approximately 19 seconds.

The seeker is calibrated using a chopper wheel. This device is a fan of six blades: five black blades with low IR emissivity and one semi-reflective blade. These blades spin in front of the seeker optics in a synchronized fashion such that the FPA is continually provided with points of reference in addition to viewing the scene. These reference points allow the FPA to reduce noise introduced by response variations in the detector elements.


The platform on which the seeker is mounted must be stabilized with respect to the motion of the missile body and the seeker must be moved to stay aligned with the target. The stabilization system must cope with rapid acceleration, up/down and lateral movements. This is done by a gimbal system, accelerometers, spinning-mass gyros (or MEMS), and motors to drive changes in position of the platform. The system is basically an autopilot. Information from the gyros is fed to the guidance electronics which drive a torque motor attached to the seeker platform to keep the seeker aligned with the target. The wires that connect the seeker with the rest of the missile are carefully designed to avoid inducing motion or drag on the seeker platform.


Top attack flight path. 1-27 Top attack flight path..PNG
Top attack flight path.
Direct attack flight path. 1-29 Direct attack flight path..PNG
Direct attack flight path.

The tracker is key to guidance/control for an eventual hit. The signals from each of the 4,096 detector elements (64×64 pixel array) in the seeker are passed to the FPA readout integrated circuits which reads then creates a video frame that is sent to the tracker system for processing. By comparing the individual frames, the tracker determines the need to correct so as to keep the missile on target. The tracker must be able to determine which portion of the image represents the target.

The target is initially defined by the gunner, who places a configurable frame around it. The tracker then uses algorithms to compare that region of the frame based on image, geometric, and movement data to the new image frames being sent from the seeker, similar to pattern recognition algorithms. At the end of each frame, the reference is updated. The tracker is able to keep track of the target even though the seeker's point of view can change radically in the course of flight.

The missile is equipped with four movable tail fins and eight fixed wings at mid-body. To guide the missile, the tracker locates the target in the current frame and compares this position with the aim point. If this position is off center, the tracker computes a correction and passes it to the guidance system, which makes the appropriate adjustments to the four movable tail fins. This is an autopilot. To guide the missile, the system has sensors that check that the fins are positioned as requested. If not, the deviation is sent back to the controller for further adjustment. This is a closed-loop controller.

There are three stages in the flight managed by the tracker: 1) an initial phase just after launch; 2) a mid-flight phase that lasts for most of the flight; and 3) a terminal phase in which the tracker selects the most effective point of impact. With guidance algorithms, the autopilot uses data from the seeker and tracker to determine when to transition the missile from one phase of flight to another. Depending on whether the missile is in top attack or direct attack mode, the profile of the flight can change significantly. The top attack mode requires the missile to climb sharply after launch and cruise at high altitude then dive on the top of the target (curveball). In direct attack mode (fastball), the missile cruises at a lower altitude directly at the target. The exact flight path which takes into account the range to the target is calculated by the guidance unit.


British and Lithuanian troops conduct anti-tank live-fire training using NLAW and FGM-148 Javelin (March 2022)

A great familiarity of each control and swift operation needs to be achieved before the unit can be deployed efficiently. American troops are trained on the system at the Infantry School in Fort Benning, Georgia, for two weeks. The soldiers are taught basic care and maintenance, operation and abilities, assembly and disassembly, and the positions it can be fired from. Soldiers are also taught to distinguish between a variety of vehicle types even when only a rough outline is visible.

The soldiers must accomplish several timed drills with set standards before being qualified to operate the system in both training and wartime situations. There are also smaller training programs set up on most army bases that instruct soldiers on the proper use of the system. At these courses, the training program might be changed in small ways. This is most commonly only minor requirements left out due to budget, the number of soldiers vs. simulation equipment, and available time and resources. Both types of training courses have required proficiency levels that must be met before the soldier can operate the system in training exercises or wartime missions.

Combat history

The Javelin was used by the US Army, the US Marine Corps and the Australian Special Forces in the 2003 invasion of Iraq [10] on Iraqi Type 69 and Lion of Babylon tanks. During the Battle of Debecka Pass, a platoon of US Army Special Forces operators equipped with Javelins destroyed two T-55 tanks, eight armored personnel carriers, and four troop transport trucks. [29]

A US Special Forces soldier using a Javelin's CLU to spot ISIL targets in Syria, 11 October 2018 US Army Special Forces soldier javelin Syria.jpg
A US Special Forces soldier using a Javelin's CLU to spot ISIL targets in Syria, 11 October 2018

During the War in Afghanistan, the Javelin was used effectively in counter-insurgency (COIN) operations. Initially, soldiers perceived the weapon as unsuitable for COIN due to its destructive power, but trained gunners were able to make precision shots against enemy positions with little collateral damage.[ citation needed ] The Javelin filled a niche in US weapons systems against DShK heavy machine guns and B-10 recoilless rifles—weapons like the AT4 and the M203 grenade launcher were powerful enough, but the ~300m range was insufficient. Conversely, while medium and heavy machine guns and automatic grenade launchers had the range, they lacked the power; and heavy mortars, which had both a good range and more than enough power, were not accurate enough. [1]

The Javelin had enough range, power, and accuracy for dismounted infantry to counter standoff engagement tactics employed by enemy weapons. With good locks, the missile is most effective against vehicles, caves, fortified positions, and individual personnel. If enemy forces were inside a cave, a Javelin fired into the mouth of the cave would destroy it from the inside, which was not possible from the outside using heavy mortars. The psychological effect of the sound of a Javelin firing sometimes caused insurgents to disengage and flee their position. Even when not firing, the Javelin's CLU was commonly used as a man-portable surveillance system. [1]

During the al-Shaddadi offensive of the Syrian Civil War in February 2016, a Javelin was used to blow up an attacking suicide car bomb. [30]

In 2016, claims were posted on social media that the Syrian Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) may have received Javelin missiles. [31] By June 2018, it was still unconfirmed if the YPG themselves were fielding Javelin missiles, although US special forces units have been seen operating them in support of Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) advances during the Deir ez-Zor campaign in the Middle Euphrates River Valley.

In June 2019, forces of the Libyan Government of National Accord captured four Javelins from the forces of the Libyan National Army. These missiles had been provided by the UAE. [4]

During the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, NATO provided thousands of Javelins to Ukraine, where they proved highly effective. Javelins have been responsible for a part of the hundreds of armored vehicles Ukraine has destroyed, captured or damaged. [32] An image dubbed "Saint Javelin", which shows the Virgin Mary holding a Javelin launcher in the style of an Eastern Orthodox church painting, gained attraction in social media and soon became a symbol of the Ukrainian resistance against the Russian invasion. [33] [34] [35] The Pentagon claimed that of the first 112 Javelins fired by the Ukrainians since the start of the war, 100 missiles had hit their target. [36] [37]

An unknown number of Javelin launch tube assemblies were captured by the Russian armed forces during the conflict. It is unclear if any of the captured launchers contained live rounds, or were simply tubes discarded after being used. [38] [39] [40] [41] Iran reportedly received an example of the Javelin missile from Russia, along with other Western munitions captured in Ukraine, as part of a larger deal for Shahed and Mohajer drones. [42]

In a commentary from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), concerns were raised over the US stock of Javelin missiles. According to CSIS, the US has used close to one-third of its Javelin missiles; 7,000 have been supplied thus far, with the United States buying Javelins at the rate of about 1,000 a year. The maximum production rate is 6,480 a year, but it would likely take a year or more to reach that level. Orders take 32 months to deliver; the report concluded that it would take about three or four years to replace the missiles that have already been sent to Ukraine. The missile production rate could be increased greatly with a national procurement effort. [43] [44] [45] On May 8, 2022, Lockheed Martin CEO James Taiclet stated that Lockheed will nearly double the production of Javelins to 4,000 a year. Additionally, Ukrainian officials estimated that up to 500 missiles per day were being used in the early days of the war. [46] On August 8, 2022, the US committed to sending an additional 1000 Javelin missiles. [47]

On 3 July 2023, Ukrainian Marines of the 36th Marine Brigade (Ukraine) claimed to have shot down a Ka-52 helicopter with a FGM-148 Javelin. [48]


The Javelin Weapon System has been incrementally upgraded, resulting in a number of variants and production blocks.[ citation needed ]

The LWCLU does not yet have a variant designation. [51]


A map with FGM-148 operators in blue as of April 2018 FGM-148 Javelin users.png
A map with FGM-148 operators in blue as of April 2018
A Norwegian soldier with the FGM-148 Javelin Norwegian javelin.jpg
A Norwegian soldier with the FGM-148 Javelin
UK Javelin with tripod Javelin Firing Positions MOD 45162586.jpg
UK Javelin with tripod

Current operators


Failed bids

See also

Comparable fire-and-forget systems

Comparable beam riding systems

Comparable shorter range fire-and-forget systems

Related development

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-tank guided missile</span> Guided missile for combat against armored targets

An anti-tank guided missile (ATGM), anti-tank missile, anti-tank guided weapon (ATGW) or anti-armor guided weapon is a guided missile primarily designed to hit and destroy heavily armored military vehicles. ATGMs range in size from shoulder-launched weapons, which can be transported by a single soldier, to larger tripod-mounted weapons, which require a squad or team to transport and fire, to vehicle and aircraft mounted missile systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AGM-114 Hellfire</span> American air-to-ground missile

The AGM-114 Hellfire is an American air-to-ground missile (AGM) first developed for anti-armor use, later developed for precision drone strikes against other target types, especially high-value targets. It was originally developed under the name Heliborne laser, fire-and-forget missile, which led to the colloquial name "Hellfire" ultimately becoming the missile's formal name. It has a multi-mission, multi-target precision-strike ability and can be launched from multiple air, sea, and ground platforms, including the MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper. The Hellfire missile is the primary 100-pound (45 kg) class air-to-ground precision weapon for the armed forces of the United States and many other nations. It has also been fielded on surface platforms in the surface-to-surface and surface-to-air roles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MGM-140 ATACMS</span> Rocket artillery

The MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) is a tactical ballistic missile manufactured by the US defense company Lockheed Martin. It has a range of up to 190 miles (300 km), with solid propellant, and is 13 feet (4.0 m) high and 24 inches (610 mm) in diameter. The ATACMS can be fired from the tracked M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), and the wheeled M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BGM-71 TOW</span> American anti-tank missile

The BGM-71 TOW is an American anti-tank missile. TOW replaced much smaller missiles like the SS.10 and ENTAC, offering roughly twice the effective range, a more powerful warhead, and a greatly improved semi-automatic command to line of sight (SACLOS) that could also be equipped with infrared cameras for night time use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mk 153 Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon</span> Multi-role (anti-fortification, anti-armor) rocket launcher

The Mk 153 Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon (SMAW) is a smoothbore shoulder-fired rocket launcher. It is a portable assault weapon and has a secondary anti-armor ability. Developed from the B-300, it was introduced to United States Armed Forces in 1984. It has a maximum effective range of 500 metres (550 yd) against a tank-sized target.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brimstone (missile)</span> Air-to-surface missile

Brimstone is a ground or air-launched ground attack missile developed by MBDA UK for the UK's Royal Air Force. It was originally intended for "fire-and-forget" use against mass formations of enemy armour, using a millimetre wave (mmW) active radar homing seeker to ensure accuracy even against moving targets. Experience in Afghanistan led to the addition of laser guidance in the dual-mode Brimstone missile, allowing a "spotter" to pick out specific and the highest priority targets, particularly useful to minimise collateral damage when friendly forces or civilians were in the area. The tandem shaped-charge warhead is much more effective against modern tanks than older similar weapons such as the AGM-65G Maverick missile. Three Brimstones are carried on a launcher that occupies a single weapon station, allowing a single aircraft to carry many missiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M47 Dragon</span> Anti-tank missile

The M47 Dragon, known as the FGM-77 during development, is an American shoulder-fired, man-portable anti-tank guided missile system. It was phased out of U.S. military service in 2001, in favor of the newer FGM-148 Javelin system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System</span> American armored self-propelled artillery

The M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System is an American-developed armored, self-propelled, multiple rocket launcher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NLAW</span> 2009 disposable anti-tank missile system

The Saab Bofors Dynamics NLAW, also known as the MBT LAW or RB 57, is a fire-and-forget, lightweight shoulder-fired, and disposable (single-use) line of sight (LOS) missile system, designed for infantry use. The missile uses a soft-launch system and is guided by predicted line of sight (PLOS). It can carry out an overfly top attack (OTA) on an armoured vehicle, or a direct attack (DA) on structures and non-armoured vehicles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FGM-172 SRAW</span> Anti-Tank Missile Launcher

The FGM-172 SRAW, also known as the Predator SRAW, was a lightweight, close range missile system produced by Lockheed Martin, developed by Lockheed Martin and Israel Military Industries. It is designed to complement the FGM-148 Javelin anti-tank missile. The Predator had a longer range and was more powerful than the AT4 that it was designed to replace, but had a shorter range than the Javelin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">XM501 Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System</span> Missile launch system

The Non-Line of Sight Launch System (NLOS-LS) was a self-contained missile launcher system that was under development by NETFIRES LLC, a partnership between Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. Each Container Launch Unit (CLU) holds 15 missiles, and a self-locating networked communications system. CLUs can be linked for coordinated launching, with the missiles fired and controlled remotely via autonomous vertical launch. The weapon is roughly 2 metres tall.

The XM1111 Mid-Range Munition (MRM) is a 120 mm precision guided munition developed for the Rheinmetall Rh-120 120mm gun used by several Western tanks. It was also intended to fulfill a requirement for Future Combat Systems (canceled) for a long-range, beyond line of sight (BLOS) tank munition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spike (missile)</span> Anti-tank guided missile developed in Israel

Spike is an Israeli fire-and-forget anti-tank guided missile and anti-personnel missile with a tandem-charge high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warhead. As of 2007, it is in its fourth generation. It was developed and designed by the Israeli company Rafael Advanced Defense Systems. It is available in man-portable, vehicle-launched, and helicopter-launched variants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slat armor</span> Vehicle armor to protect against shaped charge warheads

Slat armor, also known as bar armor, cage armor, and standoff armor, is a type of vehicle armor designed to protect against high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) attacks, as used by anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Type 01 LMAT</span> Japanese-made portable fire-and-forget anti-tank missile

The Type 01 LMAT is a Japanese man-portable fire-and-forget anti-tank missile. Development began in 1993 at Kawasaki Heavy Industries and was accepted into service in 2001. During development, the missile was designated with the codename XATM-5. Later it was known briefly as the: ATM-5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AGM-176 Griffin</span> American-made air-to-surface and surface-to-surface guided missile

The AGM-176 Griffin is a lightweight, precision-guided munition developed by Raytheon. It can be launched from the ground or air as a rocket-powered missile or dropped from the air as a guided bomb. It carries a relatively small warhead, and was designed to be a precision low-collateral damage weapon for irregular warfare. It has been used in combat by the United States military during the War in Afghanistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AeroVironment Switchblade</span> American loitering missile

The AeroVironment Switchblade is a miniature loitering munition designed by AeroVironment and used by several branches of the United States military. Small enough to fit in a backpack, the Switchblade launches from a tube, flies to the target area, and crashes into its target while detonating its explosive warhead. The name switchblade comes from the way the spring-loaded wings are folded up inside a tube and flip out once released.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Akeron MP</span> French-made portable fire-and-forget anti-tank missile

The Akeron MP, formerly known as MMP, is a French fifth generation, network-enabled, anti-tank guided missile system. Featuring both fire-and-forget and command guidance operating modes, it also integrates third party target designation for indirect firing scenarios through its lock-on after launch capability for non-line-of-sight (NLOS) use.

The Pike is a precision-guided mini-missile or grenade munition designed by Raytheon. It is a 40 mm guided munition that can be fired from the barrel of a Heckler & Koch M320 Grenade Launcher Module and Enhanced Grenade Launching Module (EGLM) like a standard 40mm grenade, but is powered by a rocket motor to propel it 2,000 m to give infantrymen improved extended-range precision capabilities. The weapon uses a digital, semi-active laser seeker to guide itself to within five meters of the target; it can operate in a two-man shooter/spotter team or by the grenadier alone lazing after firing, as it can fly for 15 seconds before homing in. When fired, Pike has a small propellant to "kick" it 2.5–3 m (8.2–9.8 ft) out of the tube before the nearly smokeless motor ignites, and range is dependent on firing angle. The munition is effective against fixed and slow-moving mid-range targets, using a 610 lb blast fragmentation warhead with a 10-meter lethality radius. Raytheon developed the weapon for three years in collaboration with Nammo Talley, which developed the warhead and propulsion system. The Pike is intended to be more accurate with a longer range than rocket propelled grenades (RPGs) and standard rifle grenades, while being far lighter and more cost-effective than current infantry guided weapons like the $78,000 each FGM-148 Javelin. Further improvements could include different fuses, multiple-round simultaneous programming and targeting with data-link capabilities, and platform integration onto small boats, vehicles, and small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Pike weighs 1.7 lb (0.77 kg) and is 16.8 in (43 cm) long, too long to fit in the breech of the M203 grenade launcher. At AUSA 2015, Raytheon revealed they had performed two successful test firings of the Pike.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skif (anti-tank guided missile)</span> Ukrainian antitank guided missile system, Export version of Stugna-P

The Skif, also known as the Stugna-P or Stuhna-P, is a Ukrainian anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) system developed in the early 2010s by the Luch Design Bureau, a unit of UkrOboronProm. The initial guidance device PN-S (ПН-С) of the Skif was developed and manufactured by Belarusian design bureau Peleng based in Minsk.


  1. 1 2 3 "Javelin in Afghanistan: The Effective Use of an Anti-Tank Weapon for Counter-Insurgency Operations" (PDF). www.dtic.mil. Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.: Raytheon Technologies. 15 March 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
  2. Linehan, Adam (2 June 2016). "Unsung Heroes: The 'Javelin Aces' Who Laid Waste To An Iraqi Armored Unit". Task & Purpose . New York: North Equity LLC. Archived from the original on 15 June 2021. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
  3. Lagneau, Laurent (15 November 2016). "La bataille de Raqqa, en français dans le texte" [The battle of Raqqa, in French in the text]. opex360.com (in French). Zone militaire. Archived from the original on 30 August 2018. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
  4. 1 2 3 Walsh, Declan; Schmitt, Eric; Ismay, John (28 June 2019). "American Missiles Found in Libyan Rebel Compound" . The New York Times . Archived from the original on 16 November 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  5. Schogol, Jeff (7 March 2022). "The US and NATO have reportedly shipped 17,000 anti-tank weapons to Ukraine". Task & Purpose . New York: North Equity LLC. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  6. 1 2 "Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates: Justification Book of Missile Procurement, Army" (PDF). Virginia: United States Department of the Army. February 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022. Page 66:"$165.355 million supports the production of 763 missiles and the non-recurring expenses for the G-model production cut-in"
  7. "US approves Ukraine's purchase of 150 Javelin anti-tank missiles". 3 October 2019.
  8. 1 2 3 "Raytheon/Lockheed Martin Javelin Joint Venture Awarded Contract For 2,100 F-Model Missiles, Marking Initial Full-Rate Production". Orlando, Florida: Lockheed Martin. 30 January 2019. Archived from the original on 2 February 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  9. "Javelin (Warhead)" (PDF). Middletown, Iowa: American Ordnance LLC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Javelin Portable Anti-Tank Missile". www.army-technology.com. Army Technology. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 25 December 2014.
  11. "Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates: Justification Book of Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army RDT&E − Volume II, Budget Activity 5" (PDF). Virginia: United States Department of the Army. p. 187. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  12. "Javelin Missile Hits Targets Beyond Current Maximum Range During Tests". missilethreat.com. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies. 8 February 2013. Archived from the original on 15 August 2016. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
  13. Mohammadi, Ali. "Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile". Military Today. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  14. 1 2 Pike, John. "Javelin Antitank Missile". Globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  15. "Introduction to Crew Served Weapons B3M4078 Student Handout" (PDF). Camp Barrett, Virginia: United States Marine Corps. pp. 14–15. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 June 2021. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  16. "Javelin Antitank Missile". man.fas.org. Washington, DC, US: Federation of American Scientists Military Analysis Network. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
  17. Blake, Bernard (1988). Jane's Weapon Systems 1988–1989. Coulsdon, England ; Alexandria, Vancouver, US: Jane's Information Group. p. 153. ISBN   9780710608550. OCLC   18304207.
  18. "Javelin". www.redstone.army.mil. Archived from the original on 15 February 2001. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  19. "Instrumentation Development: Javelin Environmental Test System (JETS)". www.rttc.army.mil. Redstone Technical Test Center, Huntsville, Alabama, US: United States Army Test and Evaluation Command. Archived from the original on 26 January 2008. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  20. Joe Gould (9 May 2022) Lockheed, aiming to double Javelin production, seeks supply chain 'crank up'
  21. "262 Phase I Selections from the 06.2 Solicitation". Archived from the original on 27 September 2007.
  22. 1 2 Hicks, Dave (20 March 2013). "Close Combat Missile Systems Overview to Precision Strike Association" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 April 2014.
  23. Lye, Harry (12 March 2021). "Raytheon launches Stinger missile from Javelin launcher". Army Technology. New York, NY, US. Archived from the original on 25 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  24. Sgt. Gabrielle Pena (3 May 2022) Stryker Brigade Combat Team equips modernized missile system
  25. AUSA NEWS: Lightweight Javelin Launcher Enters Low-Rate Production. National Defense Magazine. 11 October 2022.
  26. Smith, Heather (3 July 2012). "Javelin warhead redesigned for future threats". The Redstone Rocket. Decatur, Alabama, US. Archived from the original on 25 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  27. Gould, Joe (6 May 2020). "Lockheed-Raytheon's deadlier F-Model Javelin anti-tank missile rolls into production". Defense News . Tysons, Virginia, US: Sightline Media Group. Archived from the original on 7 May 2020. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  28. "64 × 64 LWIR Focal Plane Assembly (FPA) Highly Linear, Rapid Operation Staring Array" (PDF). www.raytheon.com. Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.: Raytheon Technologies. 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  29. Shanker, Thom (22 September 2003). "The Struggle for Iraq: Combat; How Green Berets Beat the Odds at an Iraq Alamo" . The New York Times . Archived from the original on 14 October 2017.
  30. "EXCLUSIVE: Interethnic coalition takes on the IS group in Syria". France 24 . 22 April 2016. Archived from the original on 28 April 2016. Retrieved 24 April 2016 via Youtube.
  31. Gibbons-Neff, Thomas (23 February 2016). "This highly advanced U.S.-made anti-tank missile could now be on Syria's frontlines". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
  32. "Ukraine Has Become a Graveyard for Russian Tanks". WSJ.com. Wall Street Journal. 17 March 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  33. Ghosh, Poulomi (26 February 2022). "Who is St Javelin? Why is she going viral amid Russia-Ukraine war?". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  34. "How St Javelin become the face of Ukraine resistance amid war?". mint. 26 February 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  35. Gault, Matthew (25 February 2022). "Who Is St. Javelin and Why Is She a Symbol of the War in Ukraine?". Vice. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  36. Guttman, Jon (12 May 2022). "Javelin missile: Made by the US, wielded by Ukraine, feared by Russia". Military Times. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  37. "The Ukrainian army has set a record in the effectiveness of the use of anti-tank systems Javelin - Pentagon 112 shots - 100 accurate hits on target 🎯". Twitter. Retrieved 3 November 2022.
  38. "Russia Flaunts Stockpile of Western Arms Abandoned By Ukrainian Troops". Newsweek. 13 June 2022. Retrieved 15 November 2022.
  39. "Amerikanskij granatomet i raketu NLAW našli na byvših pozicijah VSU" Американский гранатомет и ракету NLAW нашли на бывших позициях ВСУ [American grenade launcher and NLAW rocket found at former positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces]. Izvestiya (in Russian). Moscow, Russia: Inews. 27 February 2022. ISSN   0233-4356. OCLC   427395058. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 15 March 2022.
  40. Jakes, Lara; Ismay, John (27 October 2022). "U.S. Program Aims to Keep Sensitive Weapons in Ukraine". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 15 November 2022.
  41. "Russia Shows Off "Trophies", Says Foreign-Made Weapons Seized". NDTV.com. Retrieved 15 November 2022.
  42. Deborah Haynes (9 November 2022). "Russia flew €140m in cash and captured Western weapons to Iran in return for deadly drones, source claims". Sky News. Archived from the original on 20 April 2023. Retrieved 10 November 2022.
  43. Cancian, Mark (12 April 2022). "Will the United States Run Out of Javelins Before Russia Runs Out of Tanks?". Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
  44. Cancian, Mark (14 April 2022). "Will the US run out of Javelin anti-tank missiles to give Ukraine before Russia runs out of tanks?". Yahoo.com. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
  45. "US stocks of Javelin anti-tank missiles are running low, report says". Egypt Independent. 14 April 2022. Retrieved 16 April 2022.
  46. "Lockheed is nearly doubling production of Javelin anti-tank missiles". Business Insider. 9 May 2022. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
  47. "$1 Billion in Additional Security Assistance for Ukraine". U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved 8 August 2022.
  48. "Marines shoot down Russian helicopter with Javelin anti-tank missile system". MSN. 3 July 2023.
  49. 1 2 3 4 5 "FGM-148 Javelin". Missile Threat.
  50. 1 2 "US Army expected to receive new F-model Javelin missile later this year". Janes.com.
  51. 1 2 3 4 "Javelin Close Combat Missile System – Medium" (PDF). Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2022.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  52. "Javelin Portable Anti-Tank Missile". Army Technology. 14 March 2022.
  53. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The World Defence Almanac 2010. Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, US: Monch Publishing Group. 2010. pp. 136, 174, 184, 286, 298, 418, 423. ISBN   9781612000565. ISSN   0722-3226. OCLC   751805929.
  54. "Bahrain Requests 160 Javelins & 60 CLUs". Archived from the original on 24 March 2007. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
  55. "MORH objavio Plan nabave u 2023. – Javelini i Patrije, te povratak tajnosti".
  56. "Network Scan Data" (PDF). morh.hr (in Croatian). January 2023. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
  57. "Expert Infantry Badge and Expert Soldier Badge training in Poland".
  58. "A-report" (PDF) (in Czech). Prague, Czech Republic: The Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  59. "Czech Republic to buy Javelin ATGWs | IHS Jane's 360". RadioDixie. 7 December 2015. Archived from the original on 19 August 2022.
  60. Einmann, Andres (18 November 2014). "Eesti saab Javelini tankitõrjesüsteemid järgmisel aastal" [Estonia will receive Javelin anti-tank systems next year]. Postimees (in Estonian). Tallinn, Estonia. Archived from the original on 19 January 2018. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
  61. "Armor: Missing Milans In Gaza". Strategypage.com. 21 October 2012. Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  62. Pierre, Tran (5 December 2015). "France Orders Anti-Tank Missile from MBDA". Defense News . Tysons, Virginia, US: Sightline Media Group. Archived from the original on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  63. "The U.S. Congress approved the sale of the Georgia anti-tank systems "javelin"". Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
  64. Bisaccio, Derek (4 April 2019). "Georgia Receives All Javelin Missile Systems". Forecast International. Archived from the original on 23 April 2019. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
  65. "US Approves Javelin Missile Sale to Georgia in Deal Worth $30 Million". 5 August 2021.
  66. "FGM-148 Javelin Block I: Fire and Forget Dengan Pemandu Infra Red". Indomiliter.com. 19 August 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  67. Jones, Richard D. Jane's Infantry Weapons 2009/2010. Jane's Information Group; 35 edition (27 January 2009). ISBN   978-0-7106-2869-5.
  68. "Jordan to buy Javelin anti-tank missiles from USA of worth $388 million". Archived from the original on 6 March 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2016.
  69. "Raytheon/Lockheed secure contract for foreign Javelin missile sales". UPI. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  70. Scott, Nicholas (16 August 2017). "Lockheed-Raytheon JV Awarded $134M to Supply 3 FMS Clients With Javelin Equipment". Gov Con Wire.
  71. "Raketų paleidimo sistema "JAVELIN"" [JAVELIN missile launch system]. kariuomene.kam.lt (in Lithuanian). Lithuanian Armed Forces. Archived from the original on 1 April 2016. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  72. John Pike (18 December 2015). "Lithuania-Javelin Missiles and Command Launch Units". Globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  73. Marcus, Jonathan (30 May 2017). "Should Russia's new Armata T-14 tanks worry Nato?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 30 May 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  74. "US approves sale to Poland of 180 Javelin guided missiles". The Defense Post. Washington, D.C., US. 5 March 2020. Archived from the original on 28 February 2022. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
  75. "Poland – Javelin Missile and Command Launch Unit". www.dsca.mil. Washington, D.C., US: Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 4 March 2020. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
  76. "FMS: Qatar Requests Sales of 500 Javelin Anti-Tank Missile Rounds and 50 Launch Units". Deagel.com. 28 March 2013. Archived from the original on 4 April 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  77. Mustafa, Awad (27 March 2014). "$23.9B in Deals Announced on Last Day of DIMDEX". Defense News . Tysons, Virginia, US: Sightline Media Group. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  78. "Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – JAVELIN Missiles | The Official Home of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency". Dsca.mil. 18 November 2010. Archived from the original on 27 May 2017. Retrieved 30 May 2017.
  79. Written at Bethesda, Maryland, US. "Taiwan Agrees to Purchase Raytheon-Lockheed Martin Javelin Anti-tank Weapon System". missilesandfirecontrol.com. Tucson, Arizona, US: Lockheed Martin. 24 July 2002. Archived from the original on 27 March 2007. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  80. "Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States – JAVELIN Guided Missile Systems" (PDF). DSCA. 3 October 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 5 October 2008.
  81. "News". U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved 3 February 2023.
  82. "New Shoulder-Launched Missile Enters Service Four Months Early". Government News Network. 28 July 2005. Archived from the original on 3 March 2008. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  83. "Javelin Medium Range Anti-tank Guided Weapon". Archived from the original on 10 January 2013. Retrieved 8 October 2011.
  84. Mark, Cancian (12 April 2022). "Will the United States Run Out of Javelins Before Russia Runs Out of Tanks?". Center for Strategic and International Studies. CSIS. Retrieved 9 October 2022.
  85. 1 2 "U.S. Army Awards Contracts for Javelin Anti-Tank Weapon Systems". Media - Lockheed Martin. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
  86. "E konfirmon edhe Peleshi: Shqipëria do të armatoset me antitankun më të mirë në botë". a2news.com (in Albanian). Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  87. "Brazil – Javelin Missiles | Defense Security Cooperation Agency". www.dsca.mil. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
  88. "Lockheed-Raytheon JV wins $309 mln Javelin missile contract from U.S. army". Reuters. 17 May 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
  89. Grevatt, Jon (8 February 2021). "US approves Javelin sale to Thailand". Janes Defense News. Archived from the original on 2 August 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  90. Pandit, Rajat (17 August 2010). "India to order large number of Javelin anti-tank missiles from US". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 12 September 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
  91. Pandit, Rajat (29 November 2012). "Israel pips US in anti-tank guided missile supply to India". The Times of India . Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
  92. Raghuvanshi, Vivek (16 August 2014). "Too Early To Assess Indo-US Defense Ties". Defensenews.com. Gannett. Archived from the original on 16 August 2014. Retrieved 16 August 2014.