May 2003 Madrilenian regional election

Last updated
May 2003 Madrilenian regional election
Flag of the Community of Madrid.svg
  1999
25 May 2003
2003 (Oct)  

All 111 seats in the Assembly of Madrid
56 seats needed for a majority
Opinion polls
Registered4,443,533 Increase2.svg 3.9%
Turnout3,078,052 (69.3%)
Increase2.svg 8.4 pp
 First partySecond partyThird party
  Esperanza Aguirre 2004 (cropped).jpg Rafael Simancas 2004 (cropped).jpg Fausto Fernandez 2014c (cropped).jpg
Leader Esperanza Aguirre Rafael Simancas Fausto Fernández
Party PP PSOE IUCM
Leader since16 October 200226 November 200011 March 2002
Last election55 seats, 51.1%39 seats, 36.4%8 seats, 7.7%
Seats won55479
Seat changeSteady2.svg 0Increase2.svg 8Increase2.svg 1
Popular vote1,429,8901,225,390235,428
Percentage46.7%40.0%7.7%
SwingDecrease2.svg 4.4 pp Increase2.svg 3.6 pp Steady2.svg 0.0 pp

President before election

Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón
PP

President after election

No government formed
and fresh election called.
Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón
remains acting President

Contents

A regional election was held in the Community of Madrid on Sunday, 25 May 2003, to elect the 6th Assembly of the autonomous community. All 111 seats in the Assembly were up for election. It was held concurrently with regional elections in twelve other autonomous communities and local elections all across Spain.

As a result of the election, the People's Party (PP) lost its absolute majority in the Assembly, thus leaving the way open for a coalition government be formed between the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) and United Left (IU). A major political scandal ensued after two PSOE deputies—Eduardo Tamayo and María Teresa Sáez—broke party discipline and refused to support PSOE regional leader Rafael Simancas's investiture. The prospective PSOE–IU alliance found itself commanding 54 seats against the 55-strong PP, which could not bring its candidate, Esperanza Aguirre, through an investiture vote as the rebel PSOE deputies would not vote for her either. With no candidate able to obtain the required votes to become president, the regional Assembly was dissolved on 28 August 2003 and a snap election was held in October 2003.

Background

The PP had replaced the PSOE in government after 12 years of Socialist rule as a result of the 1995 election. In the 1999 election, the PP, under Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón, managed to maintain their absolute majority, despite the opposition PSOE recovering lost ground. For the 2003 election, the ruling PP had switched leadership: President Ruiz-Gallardón ran as candidate for the office of Mayor of Madrid, while senator and former minister Esperanza Aguirre was selected to lead the regional list.

Overview

Under the 1983 Statute of Autonomy, the Assembly of Madrid was the unicameral legislature of the homonymous autonomous community, having legislative power in devolved matters, as well as the ability to vote confidence in or withdraw it from a regional president. [1]

Electoral system

Voting for the Assembly was on the basis of universal suffrage, which comprised all nationals over 18 years of age, registered in the Community of Madrid and in full enjoyment of their political rights, provided that they were not sentenced—by a final court ruling—to deprivation of the right to vote, nor being legally incapacitated. [2] [3] [4]

The Assembly of Madrid was entitled to one seat per each 50,000 inhabitants or fraction greater than 25,000. All members were elected in a single multi-member constituency—corresponding to the autonomous community's territory—using the D'Hondt method and a closed list proportional voting system, with an electoral threshold of five percent of valid votes (which included blank ballots) being applied regionally. [2] [5] As a result of the aforementioned allocation, the Assembly was entitled to 111 seats, based on the official population figures resulting from the latest revision of the municipal register (as of 1 January 2002). [6]

The law did not provide for by-elections to fill vacated seats; instead, any vacancies that occurred after the proclamation of candidates and into the legislative term were to be covered by the successive candidates in the list and, when required, by the designated substitutes. [7] [8]

Election date

The term of the Assembly of Madrid expired four years after the date of its previous ordinary election, with election day being fixed for the fourth Sunday of May every four years. The election decree was required to be issued no later than the fifty-fifth day prior to the scheduled election date and published on the following day in the Official Gazette of the Community of Madrid (BOCM). [2] [9] [10] The previous election was held on 13 June 1999, setting the date for election day on the fourth Sunday of May four years later, which was 25 May 2003.

The regional president had the prerogative to dissolve the Assembly of Madrid and call a snap election, provided that no motion of no confidence was in process, no nationwide election was due and some time requirements were met: namely, that dissolution did not occur either during the first legislative session or within the parliament's last year ahead of its scheduled expiry, nor before one year had elapsed since a previous dissolution. [11] [12] In the event of an investiture process failing to elect a regional president within a two-month period from the first ballot, the Assembly was to be automatically dissolved and a fresh election called. [13] Any snap election held as a result of these circumstances would not alter the period to the next ordinary election, with elected deputies merely serving out what remained of their original four-year term. [11] [14]

The election to the Assembly of Madrid was officially called on 1 April 2003 with the publication of the corresponding decree in the BOCM, setting election day for 25 May and scheduling for the chamber to reconvene on 10 June. [6]

Outgoing parliament

The table below shows the composition of the parliamentary groups in the chamber at the time of the election call. [15]

Parliamentary composition in April 2003
GroupsPartiesLegislators
SeatsTotal
People's Parliamentary Group PP 5555
Socialist Parliamentary Group PSOE 3939
United Left Parliamentary Group IUCM 88

Parties and candidates

The electoral law allowed for parties and federations registered in the interior ministry, alliances and groupings of electors to present lists of candidates. Parties and federations intending to form an alliance ahead of an election were required to inform the relevant electoral commission within ten days of the election call, whereas groupings of electors needed to secure the signature of at least 0.5 percent of the electorate in the Community of Madrid, disallowing electors from signing for more than one list of candidates. [7] [16]

Below is a list of the main parties and electoral alliances which contested the election:

CandidacyParties and
alliances
Leading candidateIdeologyPrevious resultGov.Ref.
Vote %Seats
PP
List
Esperanza Aguirre 2004 (cropped).jpg Esperanza Aguirre Conservatism
Christian democracy
51.1%55Check-green.svg [17]
[18]
[19]
PSOE Rafael Simancas 2004 (cropped).jpg Rafael Simancas Social democracy 36.4%39Dark Red x.svg [20]
[21]
[22]
IUCM Fausto Fernandez 2014c (cropped).jpg Fausto Fernández Socialism
Communism
7.7%8Dark Red x.svg [23]
[24]
[25]

Opinion polls

The tables below list opinion polling results in reverse chronological order, showing the most recent first and using the dates when the survey fieldwork was done, as opposed to the date of publication. Where the fieldwork dates are unknown, the date of publication is given instead. The highest percentage figure in each polling survey is displayed with its background shaded in the leading party's colour. If a tie ensues, this is applied to the figures with the highest percentages. The "Lead" column on the right shows the percentage-point difference between the parties with the highest percentages in a poll.

Voting intention estimates

The table below lists weighted voting intention estimates. Refusals are generally excluded from the party vote percentages, while question wording and the treatment of "don't know" responses and those not intending to vote may vary between polling organisations. When available, seat projections determined by the polling organisations are displayed below (or in place of) the percentages in a smaller font; 56 seats were required for an absolute majority in the Assembly of Madrid (52 in the 1999 election).

Color key:

  Exit poll

Voting preferences

The table below lists raw, unweighted voting preferences.

Victory preferences

The table below lists opinion polling on the victory preferences for each party in the event of a regional election taking place.

Victory likelihood

The table below lists opinion polling on the perceived likelihood of victory for each party in the event of a regional election taking place.

Preferred President

The table below lists opinion polling on leader preferences to become president of the Community of Madrid.

Predicted President

The table below lists opinion polling on the perceived likelihood for each leader to become president.

Results

Overall

Summary of the 25 May 2003 Assembly of Madrid election results
MadridAssemblyDiagram200305.svg
Parties and alliancesPopular voteSeats
Votes%±pp Total+/−
People's Party (PP)1,429,89046.67−4.4055±0
Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE)1,225,39039.99+3.5647+8
United Left of the Community of Madrid (IUCM)235,4287.68−0.019+1
The Greens (LV)42,3221.38+0.690±0
The Greens of the Community of Madrid (LVCM)28,2070.92New0±0
Democratic and Social Centre (CDS)6,6960.22−0.100±0
The Phalanx (FE)4,0470.13−0.020±0
Family and Life Party (PFyV)3,9940.13New0±0
Spanish Democratic Party (PADE)3,5330.12+0.020±0
National Democracy (DN)3,2850.11New0±0
Communist Party of the Peoples of Spain (PCPE)2,4910.08−0.040±0
Independent Spanish Phalanx–Phalanx 2000 (FEI–FE 2000)2,4480.08−0.010±0
Republican Left (IR)2,3420.08New0±0
Party Association of Widows and Legal Wives (PAVIEL)2,2100.07New0±0
Humanist Party (PH)2,1720.07−0.030±0
Madrilenian Independent Regional Party (PRIM)2,0960.07−0.010±0
Citizen Unity (UC)1,9430.06−0.010±0
Commoners' Land–Castilian Nationalist Party (TC–PNC)1,7760.06New0±0
Another Democracy is Possible (ODeP)1,7490.06New0±0
Castilian Left (IzCa)1,1190.04New0±0
Blank ballots60,9421.99−0.11
Total3,064,080111+9
Valid votes3,064,08099.55+0.04
Invalid votes13,9720.45−0.04
Votes cast / turnout3,078,05269.27+8.39
Abstentions1,365,48130.73−8.39
Registered voters4,443,533
Sources [15] [26]
Popular vote
PP
46.67%
PSOE
39.99%
IUCM
7.68%
LV
1.38%
Others
2.29%
Blank ballots
1.99%
Seats
PP
49.55%
PSOE
42.34%
IUCM
8.11%

Elected legislators

The following table lists the elected legislators sorted by order of election: [26]

Aftermath

Reactions

Election results saw the People's Party (PP) remaining the largest political party but one seat short of an overall majority, with the combined left-wing bloc of the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) and United Left (IU) securing a combined 56 out of 111 seats. [27] Both left-wing parties were favourable to an alliance that ousted the PP from the regional government, [28] immediately starting negotiations to secure the investiture of regional PSOE leader Rafael Simancas as new president. [29] Talks through late May and early June were positive, [30] [31] with the issue of IU joining a coalition government with the PSOE being discussed. [32] [33] [34]

Tamayazo scandal

Upon the Assembly's reconvening on 10 June, the unexpected absence of two PSOE deputies—Eduardo Tamayo and María Teresa Sáez, aligned to the internal "grassroots reformers" faction (English for renovadores por la base) [35] —resulted in the PP outnumbering the left-wing bloc 55 to 54, leading to the election of a PP speaker as well as a PP-leaning bureau. [36] [37] Both Tamayo and Sáez attributed their action (which resulted in their party expelling them and demanding that they hand over their seats) [38] to disagreements with the PSOE–IU alliance to rule the region. [39] [40] The PSOE and IU pointed at such move being motivated out of "economic and urban interests" instead, [41] [42] and hinted at an alleged bribing aimed at preventing a left-wing government in Madrid. [43]

Election of the President of the Assembly of Madrid
Ballot →10 June 200310 June 2003
Required majority →56 out of 111Simple
Concepción Dancausa (PP)
55 / 111
X mark.svg
55 / 111
Yes check.svg
Francisco Cabaco (PSOE)
54 / 111
X mark.svg
1 / 111
X mark.svg
Blank ballots
0 / 111
53 / 111
Invalid ballots
0 / 111
0 / 111
Absentees
2 / 111
2 / 111
Sources [15] [36]

Following the Assembly's constitution, the new speaker, Concepción Dancausa, began a round of talks with the parliamentary groups in order to nominate a candidate to the regional presidency. [44] PP leaders rejected all accusations of foul play and asserted that their party, while ready to assume power, would not try to negotiate any prospective investiture of their candidate—Esperanza Aguirre—with the two PSOE defectors, [45] [46] while proposing an immediate election repeat to resolve the gridlock (though this clashed with the legal two-month period requirement since a first failed investiture vote). [47] [48] The PSOE insisted on attempting Simancas's investiture at some point, hoping to secure the resignation of Tamayo and Sáez so that they could be replaced by the successive candidates in the electoral list, but initially backed down from risking a failed vote. [49] [50]

The deadline for candidate nomination was 27 June, after which a candidate had to be proposed and an investiture debate be held by 2 July. [48] [51] While Simancas rejected accepting the defectors' votes to be elected, [52] he voluntarily accepted being nominated for investiture in order to "gain time" and thwart the PP's intention to immediately dissolve the Assembly. [53] Both defectors notified Dancausa that they would attend the Assembly and support Simancas's election, [54] prompting the Speaker to schedule the investiture debate and vote for 27–28 June with Simancas as candidate. [55] During the investiture session, Simancas publicly condemned the defectors' actions as political corruption. [56] Both Tamayo and Sáez ultimately chose to abstain, as some PSOE deputies had planned to change their vote if the defectors supported Simancas's investiture. [57]

Investiture
Nomination of Rafael Simancas (PSOE)
Ballot →28 June 200330 June 2003
Required majority →56 out of 111 X mark.svgSimple X mark.svg
Yes
54 / 111
54 / 111
No
  • PP (55)
55 / 111
55 / 111
Abstentions
2 / 111
2 / 111
Absentees
0 / 111
0 / 111
Sources [15] [57] [58]

After the investiture's failure and a parliamentary committee set up during the summer to investigate the causes of the defection—which ultimately led to a new gridlock, as both Tamayo and Sáez remained kingmakers [59] —the Assembly was dissolved on 30 August and a new regional election was called for 26 October. [60]

References

Opinion poll sources
  1. "El sondeo de Sigma Dos determina una lucha codo a codo entre populares y socialistas en Madrid". ABC (in Spanish). 25 May 2003.
  2. "Sondeo a pie de urna de Ipsos Eco Consulting para TVE". ABC (in Spanish). 25 May 2003.
  3. "Los indecisos deberán romper el empate a la alcaldía y la Comunidad de Madrid". El País (in Spanish). 18 May 2003.
  4. "La suma de PSOE e IU empata con el PP para la Comunidad de Madrid". El País (in Spanish). 18 May 2003.
  5. "Mayoría constitucionalista en Vitoria, al obtener 9 ediles el PP y 7 el PSE". ABC (in Spanish). 18 May 2003.
  6. "Empate técnico en la 'batalla' de Madrid a 9 días de las elecciones". El Mundo (in Spanish). 16 May 2003.
  7. "Estimación de diputados, mayo 2003". El Mundo (in Spanish). 16 May 2003.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 "Informe Comunidad de Madrid. Mayo 2003" (PDF). Opina (in Spanish). 11 May 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015.
  9. "Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid". El Periódico de Catalunya (in Spanish). 2 May 2003.
  10. "La izquierda arrebatará al PP la mayoría absoluta". El Periódico de Catalunya (in Spanish). 2 May 2003.
  11. 1 2 3 "La izquierda arrebatará al PP la mayoría absoluta". El Periódico de Aragón (in Spanish). 2 May 2003.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 "Preelectoral elecciones autonómicas, 2003. CA de Madrid (Estudio nº 2493. Marzo-Abril 2003)". CIS (in Spanish). 17 May 2003.
  13. "La guerra pasa factura electoral al PP". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). 18 May 2003.
  14. 1 2 3 "Gallardón mantiene la mayoría absoluta en Madrid y PSOE-IU ganarían la Comunidad". ABC (in Spanish). 28 April 2003.
  15. "El PP ganará las locales en Madrid, según una encuesta de Sondaxe". La Voz de Galicia (in Spanish). 18 January 2003.
  16. 1 2 "Rafael Simancas gobernará en la Comunidad si logra el apoyo de IU". La Voz de Galicia (in Spanish). 18 January 2003.
  17. "Ruiz-Gallardón lograría la mayoría absoluta sin Ana Botella, según un sondeo de la CEIM". El País (in Spanish). 13 November 2002.
  18. 1 2 "Instituciones y autonomías, II. CA de Madrid (Estudio nº 2455. Septiembre-Octubre 2002)". CIS (in Spanish). 19 November 2002.
  19. "El PP, partido más votado en diez Comunidades Autónomas" (PDF). El Mundo (in Spanish). 19 November 2002.
  20. "El PP ganaría las autonómicas en diez Comunidades y el PSOE en cuatro, según el CIS". ABC (in Spanish). 20 November 2002.
  21. "El PP mantiene por la mínima la mayoría en Madrid". El País (in Spanish). 29 September 2002.
  22. "Encuesta España. Septiembre 2002" (PDF). Instituto Opina (in Spanish). 29 September 2002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 May 2005. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  23. 1 2 "Sólo un pacto entre IU y el PSOE podría arrebatar la Comunidad a los populares". ABC (in Spanish). 22 September 2002.
  24. "Ruiz-Gallardón repetiría la mayoría absoluta, según una encuesta". El País (in Spanish). 15 September 2001.
  25. "La encuesta de la FSM atribuye a la izquierda la mayoría". ABC (in Spanish). 30 June 2001.
  26. "Un sondeo del PSOE sobre intención de voto predice una victoria de la izquierda". El País (in Spanish). 25 June 2001.
Other
  1. Statute (1983) , art. 9.
  2. 1 2 3 Statute (1983) , art. 10.
  3. LECM (1986) , art. 2.
  4. LOREG (1985) , arts. 2–3.
  5. LECM (1986) , art. 18.
  6. 1 2 Decreto 4/2003, de 31 de marzo, del Presidente de la Comunidad de Madrid, por el que se convocan elecciones a la Asamblea de Madrid (Decree 4/2003). Official State Gazette (in Spanish). 31 March 2003. Retrieved 6 December 2025.
  7. 1 2 LECM (1986) , arts. 10 & 18.
  8. LOREG (1985) , arts. 46 & 48.
  9. LECM (1986) , art. 8.
  10. LOREG (1985) , art. 42.
  11. 1 2 Statute (1983) , art. 21.
  12. LAMPC (1990) , art. 1.
  13. Statute (1983) , art. 18.
  14. LAMPC (1990) , art. 2.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Lozano, Carles. "Elecciones autonómicas a la Asamblea de Madrid (desde 1983)". Historia Electoral.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 December 2025.
  16. LOREG (1985) , art. 44.
  17. "Aznar impone a Esperanza Aguirre como candidata a la Comunidad de Madrid". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 10 July 2002. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  18. "Ruiz-Gallardón y Esperanza Aguirre serán los candidatos del PP en Madrid a la alcaldía y la comunidad respectivamente". ABC (in Spanish). 9 July 2002. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  19. "El PP proclama hoy a todos sus candidatos autonómicos, excepto Matas y Piqué" (in Spanish). Madrid: Servimedia. 16 October 2002. Retrieved 16 November 2025.
  20. Gutiérrez, Vera; Díez, Anabel (26 November 2000). "El guerrista Simancas, nuevo líder de la FSM con el 55% de los votos". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  21. Díez, Anabel (10 May 2002). "Trinidad Jiménez y Simancas serán elegidos candidatos por el PSOE regional el lunes". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  22. "Jiménez y Simancas, candidatos del PSOE a la alcaldía y la comunidad de Madrid". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 13 May 2002. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  23. "El alcalde de Rivas, nuevo coordinador de IU-Madrid en sustitución de Reneses". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 12 March 2002. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  24. "Fausto Fernández será el candidato de IU a la presidencia regional". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 11 July 2002. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  25. Serrano, Rodolfo (19 July 2002). "IU llega a un acuerdo de candidatos para poner fin a su crisis electoral". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 9 November 2025.
  26. 1 2 "Elecciones a la Asamblea de Madrid celebradas el 25 de mayo de 2003" (PDF). Official Gazette of the Community of Madrid (in Spanish) (149): 57–58. 25 June 2003. ISSN   1989-4791 . Retrieved 6 December 2025.
  27. "El PP pierde el poder en Madrid tras ocho años". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 27 May 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  28. "Simancas es partidario de incorporar a dirigentes de IU en su futuro Gobierno". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 27 May 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  29. "Los líderes de PSOE e IU se reúnen para empezar a negociar el Gobierno". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 29 May 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  30. "PSOE e IU quieren alcanzar "lo antes posible" el pacto para formar Gobierno". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 30 May 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  31. Rubio, Enrique (30 May 2003). "PSOE e IU negocian con optimismo el nuevo Gobierno de Madrid". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  32. "PSOE e IU acercan posiciones para formar Gobierno de coalición en Madrid". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 29 May 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  33. "Fernández pide la vicepresidencia del Gobierno regional a Simancas". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 3 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  34. "IU y PSOE confían en dar un "acelerón" a sus negociaciones". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 10 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  35. Romero, José Manuel (12 June 2003). "Crónica de una traición nunca anunciada". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  36. 1 2 "Dos diputados rebeldes del PSOE le dan al PP la Asamblea de Madrid". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. 10 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  37. Galaz, Mábel (11 June 2003). "... Y la Asamblea explotó". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  38. Díez, Anabel; De Cózar, Álvaro (11 June 2003). "Zapatero expulsa del PSOE a los dos disidentes y les exige que dejen los escaños". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  39. "Eduardo Tamayo: 'El 90% del programa del PSOE es irreconciliable con el de IU'". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. 10 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  40. Cuéllar, Manuel (11 June 2003). "Dos diputados desertores del PSOE ponen en peligro el Gobierno de izquierdas en Madrid". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  41. Elordi Cué, Carlos (11 June 2003). "IU adelanta la hipótesis de una "conspiración económica" contra el gobierno de la izquierda". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  42. "Chaves: 'La traición en Madrid responde a intereses económicos y urbanísticos'". El Mundo (in Spanish). Seville. EFE. 11 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  43. Díaz, Paloma; Gutiérrez, Mario (10 June 2003). "El PSOE expulsa a los dos diputados rebeldes y dice que no actuaron por motivos políticos". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  44. "La presidenta de la Asamblea comenzará mañana la ronda de contactos para elegir presidente autonómico". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 11 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  45. Marcos, Pilar (11 June 2003). "Los 55 diputados del PP votarán a su candidata "como pidieron sus electores"". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  46. De Cózar, Álvaro; González, Miguel (11 June 2003). "Aguirre se muestra dispuesta a asumir el Gobierno de la Comunidad con sus escaños". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  47. Cuéllar, Manuel (13 June 2003). "Aguirre quiere elecciones inmediatas en Madrid y Simancas pide más tiempo". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  48. 1 2 Cardona, Melitón (25 June 2003). "Aspectos jurídicos del escándalo de la Asamblea de la Comunidad de Madrid". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  49. Marcos, Pilar (15 June 2003). "El PSOE rechaza la propuesta del PP para renunciar a la investidura y pide más tiempo". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  50. Cuéllar, Manuel (20 June 2003). "Aguirre y Simancas renuncian a la investidura, pero el PSOE pide más tiempo". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  51. Marcos, Pilar (13 June 2003). "El 27 de junio acaba el plazo para designar un candidato a la investidura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  52. Cuéllar, Manuel (19 June 2003). "Simancas rechaza ser investido presidente con el voto de los tránsfugas". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  53. Cuéllar, Manuel (25 June 2003). "Simancas se somete a la investidura para ganar tiempo antes de las elecciones". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 8 December 2025.
  54. "Los diputados Tamayo y Sáez comunican por carta a la Asamblea su voluntad de apoyar a Simancas". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. EFE. 18 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  55. "Dancausa convoca la sesión de investidura de Simancas para el viernes y el sábado". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. Agencias. 25 June 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  56. Martín, José Luis (28 June 2003). "Cruces de acusaciones y golpes de efectos en la segunda sesión". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  57. 1 2 Martín, José Luis (29 June 2003). "La abstención de Tamayo y Sáez impide que Simancas sea investido". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  58. Cuéllar, Manuel (1 July 2003). "Los tránsfugas impiden la investidura de Simancas como presidente de Madrid". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  59. Cuéllar, Manuel (26 August 2003). "Los tránsfugas impiden que la investigación de su deserción tenga un dictamen oficial". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 7 December 2025.
  60. "El Gobierno regional convoca nuevas elecciones para el 26 de octubre". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 30 August 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2025.

Bibliography