Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization

Last updated

Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization
AbbreviationCTBTO Preparatory Commission
Formation19 November 1996;27 years ago (1996-11-19)
Founded at United Nations Headquarters, New York City
Type Intergovernmental
PurposePrepare for the entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.
HeadquartersVienna International Centre
Vienna, Austria
Coordinates 48°14′05″N16°25′01″E / 48.234722°N 16.416944°E / 48.234722; 16.416944
Fields Nuclear disarmament
Membership (2017)
 186 Member States [1]
Executive Secretary
Flag of Australia (converted).svg Robert Floyd
Budget (2018)
$128.1 million [2]
Staff (2018)
278 [2]
Website ctbto.org

The Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, or CTBTO Preparatory Commission, is an international organization based in Vienna, Austria, that is tasked with building up the verification regime of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). The organization was established by the States Signatories to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1996.

Contents

Its main purpose is twofold: to promote the entry into force of the CTBT, and to establish a global verification regime in preparation for the Treaty's entry into force. [3]

As the CTBTO Preparatory Commission is an interim organization, it will be dissolved once the CTBT enters into force and will be replaced by the CTBTO, with all its assets being transferred to the CTBTO. This change will occur at the close of the first Conference of States Parties of the CTBT, which will take place when the Treaty has entered into force. For the Treaty to enter into force, the following states need to ratify the CTBT: China, North Korea, Egypt, India, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, Russia, and the United States. Entry into force will occur 180 days after these states ratify the Treaty. [3] [4]

Organization

The commission is composed of two main organs, the Plenary Body and the Provisional Technical Secretariat. [3]

Plenary Body

The Plenary Body, sometimes called the Preparatory Commission, is composed of all States Signatories of the CTBT. [5] The work of the Body is assisted by the following working groups:

Provisional Technical Secretariat

The Provisional Technical Secretariat (PTS) assists the Preparatory Commission in carrying out its activities, as well as working to fulfill its mandate. [5] The work of the Secretariat is divided amongst three main technical divisions:

Additionally, these technical divisions are supported by the Legal and External Relations Division and the Division of Administration. [3]

The Secretariat is headed by an Executive Secretary, the current of which is Robert FLOYD of Australia. Floyd began his tenure as Executive Secretary of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) on 1 August 2021. He is the fourth Executive Secretary of the CTBTO. [3]

In January 2016, the CTBTO launched the CTBTO Youth Group, an initiative to engage the next generation of policymakers, maybe legislators, as well as the thinkers and academics of the next generation. [6] The CTBTO Youth Group has more than 1,200 members, as of late 2021. [7]

Membership

Participation in the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Annex 2, signed and ratified Annex 2, signed Annex 2, non-signatory Not Annex 2, signed and ratified Not Annex 2, signed Not Annex 2, non-signatory CTBT Participation.svg
Participation in the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty
  Annex 2, signed and ratified
  Annex 2, signed
  Annex 2, non-signatory
  Not Annex 2, signed and ratified
  Not Annex 2, signed
  Not Annex 2, non-signatory

All states which are signatories to the CTBT are automatically members of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission. [4] [5]

As of March 2024 there are 187 Member States of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission, the latest of which to join was Somalia, which signed the treaty on 8 September 2023. Of these, 178 have ratified the Treaty. The latest state to ratify the Treaty was Papua New Guinea, on 13 March 2024. [1]

Annex 2 States

Annex 2 States are those states that participated in the negotiations of the CTBT, and were also members of the Conference on Disarmament, which possessed nuclear power or research reactors at the time. In order for the CTBT to enter into force all 44 of these states must sign and ratify the Treaty. [8] [9] The following are the Annex 2 States: [9]

Leadership

Preparatory Commission

The following compose the leadership of the Preparatory Commission: [3]

NameCountryPosition
Robert FloydFlag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia Executive Secretary
Maria Assunta Accili SabbatiniFlag of Italy.svg  Italy Chairperson
Alfredo Raul Chuquihuara ChilFlag of Peru.svg  Peru Chairperson on Administration
Joachim SchulzeFlag of Germany.svg  Germany Chairperson on Verification
Michael WestonFlag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom Chairperson, Advisory Group

List of Executive Secretaries

NameCountryTermReference(s)
Wolfgang HoffmannFlag of Germany.svg  Germany 3 March 1997 – 31 July 2005
Tibor TóthFlag of Hungary.svg  Hungary 1 August 2005 – 31 July 2013
Lassina Zerbo Flag of Burkina Faso.svg  Burkina Faso 1 August 2013 – 31 July 2021
Robert FloydFlag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia 1 August 2021 - Incumbent

Verification regime

Infrasound arrays at IMS infrasound station IS18, Qaanaaq, Greenland Infrasound Arrays.jpg
Infrasound arrays at IMS infrasound station IS18, Qaanaaq, Greenland
IMS Radionuclide station RN20, Beijing, China. The station is also equipped for noble gas monitoring. CTBT Radionuclide Station RN20.jpg
IMS Radionuclide station RN20, Beijing, China. The station is also equipped for noble gas monitoring.
Communication systems at hydroacoustic station HA08 at British Indian Ocean Territory Communication systems at Hydroacoustic Station HA08.jpg
Communication systems at hydroacoustic station HA08 at British Indian Ocean Territory

The Preparatory Commission has started building the global systems for the detection of nuclear tests required for the success of the CTBTO. The system consists of the following elements to verify that a nuclear test has occurred: the International Monitoring System, the International Data Centre, a Global Communications Infrastructure, Consultation and clarification, On-Site Inspection and Confidence-building measures. [13]

International Monitoring System (IMS)

The International Monitoring System consists of 337 facilities worldwide to monitor the planet for signs of nuclear explosions. This will include 321 monitoring stations, as well as 16 laboratories. [13] On 19 November 2018, the CTBTO announced that all 21 monitoring facilities located in Australia were completed "and sending reliable, high-quality data ... in Vienna, Austria, for analysis." [14] Regular conferences are held for the wider scientific community as well as diplomats, international media and civil society. [15]

IMS comprises:

In 2022-2023 the seismic data collected from IMS detected (kinetic) Russian conventional attacks on Ukraine. [20] Such is the wide net cast for assorted phenomena by IMS that analysis its plethora of data has discovered the song of heretofore unknown (and as yet unseen) pygmy sperm whales. The manifold data are also used by volcanologists, and to monitor ambient shipping noise and the infrasound of the aurora borealis and australis. It has even registered the infrasound of a 10 cm earth-grazing meteor. [21] [22] Annual conferences are held for the wider scientific community, national departments involved in the CBTO's work, diplomats, independent academic and research institutions, the media, and civil society at large. [15]

Global Communications Infrastructure

The Global Communications Infrastructure (GCI) transmits all data collected by the 337 IMS stations in real time to the IDC in Vienna, where it will be processed. [23] This data is transmitted via a network of six satellites and over 250 VSAT links.

Additionally, the GCI is used to transmit raw data from the IMS stations to Member States, as well as data bulletins from the IDC.

International Data Centre

The International Data Centre (IDC) collects, processes and analyzes data from the 337 IMS stations. It then produces data bulletins, which are sent to the Member States. The IDC also archives all data and data bulletins in its computer center. [13] [24]

Incoming data are used to register, locate and analyze events, with an emphasis on detecting nuclear explosions. Analysts review these data and prepare a quality-controlled bulletin to send out to the Member States. The IDC has sent out IMS station data and IDC data bulletins to Member States since 21 February 2000. [13]

On-site inspection

The most intrusive verification measure under the CTBT is an on-site inspection. On-site inspection (OSI), involving a comprehensive search of a designated inspection area of up to 1000 km2, can only be requested by States Parties to the CTBT following entry into force of the Treaty, and are launched in order to ascertain whether or not a nuclear explosion has been conducted in violation of the Treaty. Once an on-site inspection has been requested the State Party sought to be inspected cannot refuse to allow it to take place.

The Treaty defines specific activities and techniques that can be applied during an OSI. These activities and techniques become more intrusive as the inspection progresses and serve as the means by which an inspection team gathers facts that shed light on the event that led to the request for an OSI. In most cases, this requires the deployment of complex technical equipment and detailed procedures with the CTBTO working to identify required specifications, develop and test detection methods, and acquire and maintain equipment covering all OSI techniques for ongoing equipment testing and inspector training.

Inspection methodology is critical for an OSI and follows a multilevel concept called inspection team functionality. This concept describes the decision making, communication, reporting structures and procedures required for the functioning of an inspection team during an OSI. The framework for the technical and scientific work of the inspection team is the information-led search logic designed to maximize efficiency and effectiveness in collecting facts and information.

At the centre of an OSI will be a team of up to 40 inspectors, including experts in the application of the OSI techniques listed above as well as ancillary functions such as health and safety, operations and logistics support. Following the conclusion of an inspection, the inspection team will report its findings to the Director-General of the CTBTO. In preparation for EIF, the Commission is continuously developing, testing and refining a detailed inspector training programme.

Exercises play an integral role in efforts to build up the OSI element of the verification regime established by the Treaty and to reinforce its significant role in the international framework of nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. Exercises allow various inspection activities, techniques, processes and procedures to be tested and refined in the context of a tactical scenario environment. The organization conducts a variety of exercises, the main difference being the objectives, scope and environment in which they take place (i.e. indoors, outdoors or a combination thereof). [13] [25] [26]

Consultation and clarification

If a Member State feels that a date bulletin from the IDC implies a nuclear explosion, it can request a consultation and clarification process. This allows a State, through the Executive Council of the CTBTO, to request from another State clarification on a suspected nuclear explosion. A State that has received such a request has 48 hours to clarify the event in question. [13]

However, this process can only be triggered after the CTBT enters into force.

Confidence-building measures

In order to fine-tune the IMS network, and to build confidence in the system, Member States are advised to notify the CTBTO Technical Secretariat in the case of any chemical explosion using more than 300 tonnes of TNT-equivalent blasting material. This ensures that there is no misinterpretation of verification data and that they are not accused of performing nuclear explosion. [13]

However, this is done on a voluntary basis.

Preparatory Commission's data

While the data collected by the Preparatory Commission can be used to detect nuclear tests, it can also be used by civil society, as well as for scientific uses. This information is particularly useful in the field of disaster mitigation and early warning. In 2006, the CTBTO started providing seismic and hydroacoustic data directly to tsunami warning centers. As of 2012, data is shared with tsunami warning centers in eight countries, mainly in the Indo-Pacific region. [27]

Throughout the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster of March 2011, the CTBTO's radionuclide stations tracked the dispersion of radioactivity on a global scale. [28] More than 1600 detections of radioactive isotopes from the crippled nuclear reactor were picked up by over 40 CTBTO radionuclide monitoring stations. The CTBTO shared its data and analysis with its 186 Member States, as well as international organizations and some 1,200 scientific and academic institutions in 120 countries. [29]

The CTBTO also recorded the infrasound produced in the atmosphere by the meteor explosion over Chelyabinsk, Russia in 2013. Seventeen stations around the world, including one in the Antarctic, recorded the event as the infrasound reverberated around the world multiple times. [30]

Recordings from CTBTO hydrophones was analyzed to determine an impact location for Air France Flight 447 and Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, both of which were lost without a known crash site. No data was detected in the event of Flight 447, even after it was reassessed once the location of the wreckage was known. [31] As of July 2014, Flight 370 remains missing with no known crash site or confirmed debris. Since the only evidence for Flight 370's final resting site comes from an analysis of its satellite transmissions, which has resulted in an imprecise and very large search area, hydroacoustic recordings from CTBTO were analyzed to potentially determine and locate its impact with the Indian Ocean. Analysis of available hydroacoustic recordings (including those made by a CTBTO hydrophone located off Cape Leeuwin, Western Australia) identified one event which may be associated with Flight 370. [31] [32] [33]

Other potential civil and scientific applications include the use of CTBTO data and technologies in civil aviation and shipping and in climate change research. [34]

Verification regime in action

In the morning of 9 October 2006, North Korea set off a nuclear explosion. It detonated a nuclear device at a test site in the northeast of the country. The CTBTO's global monitoring network detected the low yield explosion with 22 of its seismic stations. Within two hours of the explosion, CTBTO Member States received initial information about the time, location and magnitude of the blast.

Two weeks after the blast, a monitoring station at Yellowknife in northern Canada detected traces of the radioactive noble gas xenon in the air. The presence of xenon provides evidence that a nuclear explosion has taken place. This detection confirmed that the 2006 North Korean nuclear test was a nuclear explosion. Analysts at the CTBTO then used special calculations to backtrack the detected xenon to determine its source. The calculation indicated that the detected noble gas originated from North Korea. [35]

North Korea conducted a second nuclear test on 25 May 2009. Seismic data indicated an unusually large underground explosion. The blast took place only a few kilometers from where the first nuclear device had been detonated in 2006.

Considerably more seismic stations registered the explosion in 2009 than in 2006. This was due to the greater magnitude of the blast and the higher number of monitoring stations in operation. Two hours after the test, the CTBTO presented initial findings to its Member States. The information available also helped analysts to identify a far smaller area as the location of the explosion. In 2009 the estimated area covered 264 km2 compared to 880 km2 in 2006. [36] [37]

In the morning of 12 February 2013 (at 02.57.51 UTC), the CTBTO monitoring system detected another unusual seismic event in North Korea, which measured 4.9 in magnitude. Later that morning, North Korea announced that it had conducted a third nuclear test. The event was registered by 94 seismic stations and two infrasound stations in the CTBTO's network. The first automatic analysis of location, time and magnitude was made available to Member States in less than an hour. [38] The analysed data showed the event's location (with a certainty of about +/- 8.1 km) was largely identical with the two previous nuclear tests (Lat.: 41.313 degrees north; long.: 129.101 degrees east). As with the two previous nuclear tests, the signal was emitted from close to the surface. [39]

The CTBTO radionuclide network later made a significant detection of radioactive isotopes of xenon  – xenon-131m and xenon-133 – that could be attributed to the nuclear test. The detection was made at the radionuclide station in Takasaki, Japan, located at around 1,000 kilometres, or 620 miles, from the North Korean test site. Lower levels were picked up at another station in Ussuriysk, Russia. [40] [41] Using Atmospheric Transport Modelling, which calculates the three-dimensional travel path of airborne radioactivity on the basis of weather data, the North Korean test site was identified as a possible source for the emission. [42] [43]

On 22/23 June 2020 radionuclide stations in and near Stockholm, Sweden, detected unusually high levels of caesium-134, caesium-137 and ruthenium-103 and around the Baltic Sea. [44]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty</span> 1996 treaty banning all nuclear weapons testing

The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) is a multilateral treaty to ban nuclear weapons test explosions and any other nuclear explosions, for both civilian and military purposes, in all environments. It was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 September 1996, but has not entered into force, as eight specific nations have not ratified the treaty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty</span> 1963 international agreement

The Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT), formally known as the 1963 Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, prohibited all test detonations of nuclear weapons except for those conducted underground. It is also abbreviated as the Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT) and Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (NTBT), though the latter may also refer to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), which succeeded the PTBT for ratifying parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infrasound</span> Vibrations with frequencies lower than 20 hertz

Infrasound, sometimes referred to as low frequency sound, describes sound waves with a frequency below the lower limit of human audibility. Hearing becomes gradually less sensitive as frequency decreases, so for humans to perceive infrasound, the sound pressure must be sufficiently high. Although the ear is the primary organ for sensing low sound, at higher intensities it is possible to feel infrasound vibrations in various parts of the body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapons testing</span> Controlled detonation of nuclear weapons for scientific or political purposes

Nuclear weapons tests are experiments carried out to determine the performance, yield, and effects of nuclear weapons. Testing nuclear weapons offers practical information about how the weapons function, how detonations are affected by different conditions, and how personnel, structures, and equipment are affected when subjected to nuclear explosions. However, nuclear testing has often been used as an indicator of scientific and military strength. Many tests have been overtly political in their intention; most nuclear weapons states publicly declared their nuclear status through a nuclear test.

The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) is an international organization that will be established upon the entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, a Convention that outlaws nuclear test explosions. Its seat will be in Vienna, Austria. The organization will be tasked with verifying the ban on nuclear tests and will operate therefore a worldwide monitoring system and may conduct on-site inspections. The Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO, and its Provisional Technical Secretariat, were established in 1997 and are headquartered in Vienna, Austria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air Force Technical Applications Center</span> Military unit

The Air Force Technical Applications Center (AFTAC), based at Florida's Patrick Space Force Base, is an Air Force surveillance organization assigned to the Sixteenth Air Force. Its mission is to monitor nuclear treaties of all applicable signatory countries. This is accomplished using seismic, hydroacoustic and satellite-detection systems alongside ground based and airborne materials collection systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Underwater explosion</span> Chemical or nuclear explosion that occurs underwater

An underwater explosion is a chemical or nuclear explosion that occurs under the surface of a body of water. While useful in anti-ship and submarine warfare, underwater bombs are not as effective against coastal facilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Underground nuclear weapons testing</span> Test detonation of nuclear weapons underground

Underground nuclear testing is the test detonation of nuclear weapons that is performed underground. When the device being tested is buried at sufficient depth, the nuclear explosion may be contained, with no release of radioactive materials to the atmosphere.

The International Noble Gas Experiment (INGE) was formed in 1999 as an informal expert's group of developers of radioactive xenon measurement systems for the International Monitoring System for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). The group originally consisted of research and development groups from Germany, France, Russia, Sweden, and the United States, as well as personnel from Provisional Technical Secretariat of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization CTBTO.

National technical means of verification (NTM) are monitoring techniques, such as satellite photography, used to verify adherence to international treaties. The phrase first appeared, but was not detailed, in the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT) between the US and USSR. At first, the phrase reflected a concern that the "Soviet Union could be particularly disturbed by public recognition of this capability [satellite photography]...which it has veiled.". In modern usage, the term covers a variety of monitoring technologies, including others used at the time of SALT I.

Timothy Hampton (1962–2009) was a specialist in weapons of mass destruction and an employee of the preparatory commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) in Vienna, Austria since 1998.

Sulzberg is a mountain of Bavaria, Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Windless Bight</span>

Windless Bight is a prominent bight that indens the south side of Ross Island, Antarctica, eastward of Hut Point Peninsula. It was named by the Winter Journey Party, led by Wilson, of the British Antarctic Expedition, 1910–13, which encountered no wind in this area. The bight is permanently frozen. It is the site of a station that monitors infrasound to detect violations of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.

Forensic seismology is the forensic use of the techniques of seismology to detect and study distant phenomena, particularly explosions, including those of nuclear weapons.

The Conrad Observatory is an underground geophysical research facility of the Central Institution for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) in Austria. The basic task of the observatory is monitoring relevant physical parameters that are of decisive importance for our understanding of processes on and below earth. At the Conrad Observatory, seismic activities (seismology), variations in gravitational acceleration and mass changes (gravimetry), magnetic field variations, geodetic parameters, atmospheric waves, as well as meteorological data are continuously monitored.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2013 North Korean nuclear test</span> Test detonation on 12 February 2013

On 12 February 2013, North Korean state media announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test, its third in seven years. A tremor that exhibited a nuclear bomb signature with an initial magnitude 4.9 was detected by the China Earthquake Networks Center, Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization and the United States Geological Survey. In response, Japan summoned an emergency United Nations meeting for 12 February and South Korea raised its military alert status. It is not known whether the explosion was nuclear, or a conventional explosion designed to mimic a nuclear blast; as of two days after the blast, Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean investigators had failed to detect any radiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lassina Zerbo</span> Former Prime Minister of Burkina Faso

Lassina Zerbo is a Burkinabé politician and scientist who served as the Prime Minister of Burkina Faso from 2021 to 2022. Prior to that he was the Executive Secretary of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). On 24 January 2022, Zerbo was deposed from office in a coup d'état.

A nuclear detonation detection system (NDDS) is a device or a series of devices that are able to indicate, and pinpoint a nuclear explosion has occurred as well as the direction of the explosion. The main purpose of these devices or systems was to verify compliance of countries that signed nuclear treaties such as the Partial Test Ban treaty of 1963 (PTBT) and the Treaty of Tlatelolco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zeinabou Mindaoudou Souley</span> Nigerien physicist

Zeinabou Mindaoudou Souley is a Nigerien physicist. She leads the organisation that gathers the data necessary to check whether there has been a test of a nuclear explosive as part of nuclear non-proliferation oversight for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization in Vienna.

References

  1. 1 2 "Status of Signature and Ratification". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. 25 September 2018. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  2. 1 2 Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (2018). Annual Report 2018 (PDF) (Report). Provisional Technical Secretariat of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2021. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Establishment, Purpose and Activities". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  4. 1 2 "Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO Preparatory Commission)". Nuclear Threat Initiative. 25 September 2017. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  5. 1 2 3 "Composition and Structure". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  6. ↑ "Confronting the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Challenge: An Interview With New CTBTO Executive Secretary Robert Floyd | Arms Control Association". www.armscontrol.org. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  7. ↑ "About the CTBTO Youth Group". youthgroup.ctbto.org. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  8. ↑ "Glossary". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  9. 1 2 "Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT)". Nuclear Threat Initiative. 31 July 2018. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  10. ↑ "Appointment of the Executive Secretary: Terms and Conditions. Decision". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. 3 March 1997. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  11. ↑ Thunborg, Annika (1 August 2005). "Ambassador Tibor Toth Becomes New Executive Secretary of the Preparatory Commission for the CTBTO". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  12. ↑ Mützelburg, Thomas (1 August 2013). "Executive Secretary Lassina Zerbo Takes Office, Travels to China". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Overview of the Verification Regime". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  14. ↑ Lassina Zerbo (19 November 2018). "Australia completes its monitoring stations in the Global Network to detect nuclear tests". CTBTO. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
  15. 1 2 "Science and Technology Conferences [SnT]". CTBTO. Archived from the original on 1 May 2024.
  16. ↑ "Seismic Monitoring". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  17. ↑ "Hydroacoustic Monitoring". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  18. ↑ "Infrasound Monitoring". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  19. ↑ "Radionuclide Monitoring". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  20. ↑ Dando, Ben D. E.; Goertz-Allmann, Bettina P.; Brissaud, Quentin; Köhler, Andreas; Schweitzer, Johannes; Kværna, Tormod; Liashchuk, Alexander (30 August 2023). "Identifying attacks in the Russia–Ukraine conflict using seismic array data". Nature. 621 (7980): 767–772. Bibcode:2023Natur.621..767D. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06416-7. ISSN   1476-4687. PMC   10533404 . PMID   37648860.
  21. ↑ Fisher, Richard. "Scientists built this listening network to detect nuclear bomb tests. It found blue whales instead". www.bbc.com.
  22. ↑ "CTBTO SnT2023, Forum : Day 3 Wednesday 6/21/2023 14:20 CEST, Oral session (O1.4)" – via www.youtube.com.
  23. ↑ "The Global Communications Infrastructure". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  24. ↑ "History of the International Data Centre". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  25. ↑ "The Final Verification Measure". Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. n.d. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  26. ↑ "CTBTO PrepCom Selects Five NNSA Experts as On-Site Inspection Surrogate Inspector Trainees". National Nuclear Security Administration. United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  27. ↑ "CTBTO Highlight 2010: France Inks Agreement with CTBTO to Receive Tsunami Warnings". CTBTO Preparatory Commission. Retrieved 15 May 2012.
  28. ↑ "The 11 March Japan Disaster". CTBTO Preparatory Commission. Retrieved 15 May 2012.
  29. ↑ "CTBTO Press Release 2011: CTBTO to Share Data with IAEA and WHO". CTBTO Preparatory Commission. Retrieved 15 May 2012.
  30. ↑ Russian Fireball Largest Ever Detected by CTBTO’s Infrasound Sensors, Vienna, 18 February 2013.
  31. 1 2 Molko, David; Ahlers, Mike; Marsh, Rene (4 June 2014). "Is mystery underwater sound the crash of Flight 370?". CNN. Retrieved 6 July 2014.
  32. ↑ Wolz, Susanna (4 June 2014). "Curtin researchers in search for acoustic evidence of MH370". Curtin University. Retrieved 6 July 2014.
  33. ↑ Butler, Declan (11 June 2014). "Sound clue in hunt for MH370". Nature. 510 (7504): 199–200. Bibcode:2014Natur.510..199B. doi: 10.1038/510199a . PMID   24919903.
  34. ↑ "Potential Civil and Scientific Applications of CTBT Verification Data and Technologies". CTBTO Preparatory Commission. Retrieved 15 May 2012.
  35. ↑ "CTBTO Highlight 2007: The CTBT Verification Regime Put to the Test". CTBTO Preparatory Commission. Archived from the original on 21 November 2020. Retrieved 3 April 2012.
  36. ↑ "CTBTO Press Release 2009: CTBTO's Initial Findings on the DPRK's 2009 Announced Nuclear Test". CTBTO Preparatory Commission.
  37. ↑ "CTBTO Highlight 2009: Experts Sure about Nature of the DPRK Event". CTBTO Preparatory Commission. Archived from the original on 20 May 2012. Retrieved 3 April 2012.
  38. ↑ "CTBTO Press Release 2013: On the CTBTO's detection in North Korea". CTBTO Preparatory Commission.
  39. ↑ "Update on CTBTO findings related to the announced nuclear test by North Korea". CTBTO Preparatory Commission. Archived from the original on 21 March 2015. Retrieved 14 April 2015.
  40. ↑ "Gases "consistent with" North Korea's February test found: nuclear body". Reuters. 23 April 2013.
  41. ↑ "SIPRI Yearbook 2014: Nuclear explosions, 1945–2013". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Archived from the original on 17 April 2015.
  42. ↑ "Video: CTBTO Detects Radioactivity Consistent with North Korean Nuclear Test, announced Feb 2013". CTBTO Preparatory Commission.
  43. ↑ "Media questions / answers on radionuclide detection". CTBTO Preparatory Commission.
  44. ↑ "Sensors detect rise in nuclear particles on Baltic Sea, global body says". Reuters . 26 June 2020. Archived from the original on 28 November 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.