USA-193

Last updated

USA-193
Delta II 7920 launch with NROL-21.jpg
Delta II launching USA-193, from Vandenberg Air Force Base, in December 2006
NamesNROL-21
NRO Launch 21
L-21
Mission typeReconnaissance radar imaging
Operator National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)
COSPAR ID 2006-057A OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
SATCAT no. 29651
Mission durationCommunications with satellite not maintained after launch
Spacecraft properties
ManufacturerInitially Boeing, then Lockheed Martin
Launch mass2,300 kg (5,100 lb) [1] [ non-primary source needed ]
Start of mission
Launch date14 December 2006, 21:00:00 UTC
Rocket Delta II 7920-10
Launch site Vandenberg, SLC-2W
Contractor United Launch Alliance
End of mission
DisposalDestroyed by heavily modified missile defence interceptor launched from USS Lake Erie (CG-70)
Destroyed21 February 2008
Orbital parameters
Reference system Geocentric orbit
Regime Low Earth orbit
Perigee altitude 349 km (217 mi)
Apogee altitude 365 km (227 mi)
Inclination 58.48°
Period 92.0 minutes

USA-193, also known as NRO Launch 21 (NROL-21 or simply L-21), was a United States military reconnaissance satellite (radar imaging) launched on 14 December 2006. [2] It was the first launch conducted by the United Launch Alliance (ULA). [3] Owned by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), the craft's precise function and purpose were classified. On 21 February 2008, it was destroyed as a result of Operation Burnt Frost. [4]

Contents

Design

USA-193 was part of the NRO's Future Imagery Architecture (FIA), which was begun in 1997 to produce a fleet of inexpensive reconnaissance satellites, but has become the agency's most spectacular failure. [5] USA-193 was initially developed by Boeing, which won the contract in 1999, beating out Lockheed Martin with proposals for innovative electro-optics and radar. But after cost overruns, delays, and parts failures, NRO sent the contract to Lockheed, which built USA-193 around the Boeing radar design. [5] Lockheed Martin and Boeing both supported the launch, the first in the joint effort known as the United Launch Alliance. [6] USA-193 weighed about 2,300 kg (5,100 lb), [1] [ non-primary source needed ] with a body thought to be 4.6 m (15 ft) long and 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in) wide, estimates based on the maximal Delta II payload. With the radar antenna extended, USA-193 was about the size of a basketball court (~30 × 15 m). [7]

Launch data

USA-193 (NROL-21) launch patch USA193patch.jpg
USA-193 (NROL-21) launch patch

Malfunction and orbital decay

The satellite entered orbit, but lost contact with the ground within hours. [1] [ non-primary source needed ] In late January 2008, reports from anonymous U.S. officials indicated a U.S. spy satellite, later confirmed as USA-193, [1] was in a deteriorating orbit and was expected to crash into Earth within weeks. [14] [15] This came as no surprise to amateur satellite watchers, who had been predicting the deorbit of the satellite for some time. [16]

The satellite malfunctioned shortly after deployment and was intentionally destroyed 14 months later on 21 February 2008 by a modified SM-3 missile fired from the U.S. Navy warship USS Lake Erie (CG-70), stationed west of Hawaii. [17] [18] The event highlighted growing distrust between the U.S. and China, and was viewed by some to be part of a wider "arms race" in space involving the U.S., China, and Russia. [19] It was the first launch by United Launch Alliance since it was formed in December 2006, and the first Delta II launch since ULA acquisition.

Hazardous materials on-board

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reports indicate that the satellite contained the hazardous materials hydrazine and beryllium. [20] Though there was some speculation that the satellite might have a "nuclear" power core, [21] i.e. a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG), the FEMA report indicates otherwise. On 29 January 2008, an Associated Press story quoted U.S. Air Force General Gene Renuart as saying that contingency plans were being made, since intact pieces of the satellite "might re-enter into the North American area". [22] In respecting the Space Liability Convention, the United States vowed to pay for any damage or destruction caused by their failed satellite. [23]

Destruction

View of the vertical launching system on a Ticonderoga-class cruiser US Navy 030303-N-3235P-503 A topside view of the forward MK-41 Vertical Launching System (VLS) aboard the guided missile cruiser USS San Jacinto (CG 56).jpg
View of the vertical launching system on a Ticonderoga-class cruiser

Planning for the destruction of USA-193 with a missile reportedly began on 4 January 2008, with President Bush approving the plan on 12 February 2008, [24] at an expected cost of US$40 million to US$60 million. [25] The task force had as its goal to "rupture the fuel tank to dissipate the approximately 453 kg (999 lb) of hydrazine, a hazardous fuel, which could pose a danger to people on Earth, before it entered into Earth's atmosphere". [4]

Launch of the SM-3 missile that intercepted USA-193 SM-3 launch to destroy the NRO-L 21 satellite.jpg
Launch of the SM-3 missile that intercepted USA-193

On 14 February 2008, U.S. officials announced the plan to destroy USA-193 before atmospheric reentry, stating that the intention was "saving or reducing injury to human life". They said that if the hydrazine tank fell to Earth, it "could spread a toxic cloud roughly the size of two football fields". [26] General James Cartwright confirmed that the United States Navy was preparing to launch an SM-3 missile to destroy the satellite, at an altitude of 247 km (153 mi), shortly before it entered Earth's atmosphere. [1] [ non-primary source needed ]

On 21 February 2008, at 03:26 UTC an SM-3 missile was fired from the Ticonderoga-class missile cruiser USS Lake Erie (CG-70) and intercepted USA-193 about 247 km (153 mi) above the Pacific Ocean. [4] The satellite was traveling with a velocity of 28,000 km/h (17,000 mph), or 7.8 km/s (4.8 mi/s). The velocity of the impact was about 35,000 km/h (22,000 mph). The United States Department of Defense (DoD) expressed a "high degree of confidence" that the fuel tank was hit and destroyed. [27] The satellite's remnants were expected to burn up over the course of the next 40 days, with most of the satellite's mass re-entering the atmosphere within 48 hours of the missile strike. [4] [28]

U.S. officials denied that the action was intended to prevent sensitive technology falling into foreign hands [1] and also denied that it was a response to the 2007 Chinese anti-satellite missile test. [29] This was not the first time the United States shot down one of its own satellites; the Air Force had shot down a satellite in 1985. [30] Although the U.S. had objected to the earlier Chinese test of an anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon, U.S. officials said there was "no parallel" with that test. The Chinese test destroyed a target in a high, stable orbit, leaving a large amount of space debris in orbit, while the destruction of USA-193 in a much lower orbit would create debris that would likely deorbit within weeks. [1] [31] [ non-primary source needed ]

Break-up of USA-193 following interception by the SM-3 missile SM-3 intercepting NROL-21-20080220.jpg
Break-up of USA-193 following interception by the SM-3 missile

Controversy

The Russian government claimed that this exercise was a test of the U.S. missile defense program. [31] The defense ministry of Russia accused the U.S. of using hydrazine as a cover for the test of an ASAT. It also noted that extraordinary measures had never before been needed to deal with the many spacecraft that had fallen to Earth. [31] Indeed, The New York Times had paraphrased Gordon Johndroe, spokesman for the United States National Security Council, as stating that 328 objects had deorbited (controlled and uncontrolled) in the previous five-year period. [32]

However, U.S. officials maintained that the large quantity of hydrazine on board made USA-193 a special case. [1] According to General Kevin P. Chilton, when President Bush was briefed on the situation, the danger that shooting down the satellite would be perceived as an ASAT test was brought up, and President Bush made his decision based on the dangers of an uncontrolled reentry. [33]

Other observers dismiss the threat of the hydrazine, suggesting that the effect of the cloud, when diluted over a large area, would likely be mild: "The hydrazine tank is a 1-meter sphere containing about 400 liters of hydrazine. The stated hazard area is about 2 hectares, something like 1/10,000,000,000 of the area under the orbit. The potential for actual harm is unbelievably small". [34] Other analyses, such as those cited by Yousaf Butt, show the hydrazine tank burning up in the upper atmosphere. [35] [36] [37]

Two examples of uncontrolled atmospheric re-entries causing (or almost causing) damage are the 1978 re-entry of Kosmos 954, a Soviet satellite, which landed in Canada and spread dangerous amounts of nuclear fuel from its onboard reactor over large tracts of land, and Skylab's 1979 re-entry, which rattled windows and dropped small pieces of debris onto buildings in Esperance, Western Australia (no significant monetary damage resulted, but the U.S. was symbolically fined US$400 for littering). [38] No weapon existed in 1978 to bring down Kosmos 954, and a Soviet anti-satellite weapon (part of the Istrebitel Sputnikov program), the first of its kind, was declared operational only ten days before Skylab re-entered the atmosphere, and was not capable of directing the space station's descent.

Before the destruction of USA-193, Pentagon officials repeatedly denied that it was meant to bolster the U.S. missile defense program. Six days after USA-193's destruction, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said, "the mission's success shows that U.S. plans for a missile-defense system are realistic" though in the same statement it was claimed that the weapons and systems used for this mission will not retain their ASAT capability, and will be reconfigured back to their original purpose as tactical missiles. [39]

Space debris

The destruction of USA-193 created 174 pieces of orbital debris that were cataloged by the U.S. military. [40] While most of this debris re-entered the Earth's atmosphere within a few months, a few pieces lasted slightly longer because they were thrown into higher orbits. The final piece of USA-193 debris (COSPAR 2006-057GH, SATCAT 35425) re-entered on 28 October 2009. [40]

The launch of at least one other satellite was postponed to avoid space debris from USA-193. An Atlas V launch hot line recording indicated the debris would delay the launch of a different National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) satellite USA-200 (NROL-28) as "a precautionary measure". [41]

Catalogue IDs

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-satellite weapon</span> Kinetic energy device designed to destroy satellites in orbit

Anti-satellite weapons (ASAT) are space weapons designed to incapacitate or destroy satellites for strategic or tactical purposes. Although no ASAT system has yet been utilized in warfare, a few countries have successfully shot down their own satellites to demonstrate their ASAT capabilities in a show of force. ASATs have also been used to remove decommissioned satellites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space debris</span> Pollution around Earth by defunct artificial objects

Space debris are defunct human-made objects in space – principally in Earth orbit – which no longer serve a useful function. These include derelict spacecraft, mission-related debris, and particularly numerous in-Earth orbit, fragmentation debris from the breakup of derelict rocket bodies and spacecraft. In addition to derelict human-made objects left in orbit, space debris includes fragments from disintegration, erosion, or collisions; solidified liquids expelled from spacecraft; unburned particles from solid rocket motors; and even paint flecks. Space debris represents a risk to spacecraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Reconnaissance Office</span> US intelligence agency in charge of satellite intelligence

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) is a member of the United States Intelligence Community and an agency of the United States Department of Defense which designs, builds, launches, and operates the reconnaissance satellites of the U.S. federal government. It provides satellite intelligence to several government agencies, particularly signals intelligence (SIGINT) to the National Security Agency (NSA), imagery intelligence (IMINT) to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), and measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT) to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The NRO announced in 2023 that it plans within the following decade to quadruple the number of satellites it operates and increase the number of signals and images it delivers by a factor of ten.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">KH-11 KENNEN</span> Type of American spy satellite

The KH-11 KENNEN is a type of reconnaissance satellite first launched by the American National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) in December 1976. Manufactured by Lockheed in Sunnyvale, California, the KH-11 was the first American spy satellite to use electro-optical digital imaging, and so offer real-time optical observations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space warfare</span> Combat that takes place in outer space

Space warfare is combat in which one or more belligerents are in outer space. The scope of space warfare includes ground-to-space warfare, such as attacking satellites from the Earth; space-to-space warfare, such as satellites attacking satellites; and space-to-ground warfare, such as satellites attacking Earth-based targets. Space warfare in fiction is thus sub-genre and theme of science fiction, where it is portrayed with a range of realism and plausibility. In the real world, international treaties are in place that attempt to regulate conflicts in space and limit the installation of space weapon systems, especially nuclear weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kessler syndrome</span> Theoretical satellite collision cascade

The Kessler syndrome, proposed by NASA scientists Donald J. Kessler and Burton G. Cour-Palais in 1978, is a scenario in which the density of objects in low Earth orbit (LEO) due to space pollution is numerous enough that collisions between objects could cause a cascade in which each collision generates space debris that increases the likelihood of further collisions. In 2009, Kessler wrote that modeling results had concluded that the debris environment was already unstable, "such that any attempt to achieve a growth-free small debris environment by eliminating sources of past debris will likely fail because fragments from future collisions will be generated faster than atmospheric drag will remove them". One implication is that the distribution of debris in orbit could render space activities and the use of satellites in specific orbital ranges difficult for many generations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fengyun</span> Chinese weather satellites

Fēngyún are China's meteorological satellites. Launched since 1988 into polar Sun-synchronous and geosynchronous orbit, each three-axis stabilized Fengyun satellite is built by the Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (SAST) and operated by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA). To date, China has launched twenty-one Fengyun satellites in four classes. Fengyun 1 and Fengyun 3 satellites are in polar, Sun-synchronous orbit and Low Earth orbit while Fengyun 2 and 4 are geosynchronous orbit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Launch Alliance</span> Joint venture of Lockheed Martin and Boeing

United Launch Alliance, LLC (ULA) is an American launch service provider formed in December 2006 as a joint venture between Lockheed Martin Space and Boeing Defense, Space & Security. The company designs, assembles, sells and launches rockets, but the company subcontracts out the production of rocket engines and solid rocket boosters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Future Imagery Architecture</span> American spy satellite program

Future Imagery Architecture (FIA) was a program awarded to Boeing to design a new generation of optical and radar imaging US reconnaissance satellites for the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). In 2005 NRO director Donald Kerr recommended the project's termination, and the optical component of the program was finally cancelled in September 2005 by Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte. FIA has been called by The New York Times "perhaps the most spectacular and expensive failure in the 50-year history of American spy satellite projects." Despite the optical component's cancellation, the radar component, known as Topaz, has continued, with four satellites in orbit as of February 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ASM-135 ASAT</span> Anti-satellite missile

The ASM-135 ASAT is an air-launched anti-satellite multistage missile that was developed by Ling-Temco-Vought's LTV Aerospace division. The ASM-135 was carried exclusively by United States Air Force (USAF) F-15 Eagle fighter aircraft.

On 11 January 2007, China conducted an anti-satellite missile test. A Chinese weather satellite—the FY-1C polar orbit satellite of the Fengyun series, at an altitude of 865 kilometres (537 mi), with a mass of 750 kilograms (1,650 lb)—was destroyed by a kinetic kill vehicle traveling with a speed of 8 km/s (18,000 mph) in the opposite direction. It was launched with a multistage solid-fuel missile from Xichang Satellite Launch Center or nearby.

Strictly speaking, a satellite collision is when two satellites collide while in orbit around a third, much larger body, such as a planet or moon. This definition is typically loosely extended to include collisions between sub-orbital or escape-velocity objects with an object in orbit. Prime examples are the anti-satellite weapon tests. There have been no observed collisions between natural satellites, but impact craters may show evidence of such events. Both intentional and unintentional collisions have occurred between man-made satellites around Earth since the 1980s. Anti-satellite weapon tests and failed rendezvous or docking operations can result in orbital space debris, which in turn may collide with other satellites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Burnt Frost</span> 2008 military operation to destroy a non-functioning U.S. satellite

Operation Burnt Frost was a military operation to intercept and destroy non-functioning U.S. National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) satellite USA-193. The mission was described by the Missile Defense Agency as a "mission of safeguarding human life against the uncontrolled re-entry of a 5,000-pound satellite containing over 1,000 pounds of hazardous hydrazine propellant". The launch occurred on 21 February 2008 at approximately 10:26 p.m. EST from the cruiser USS Lake Erie, using a heavily modified Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) to shoot down the satellite. A few minutes after launch, the SM-3 intercepted its target and successfully completed its mission. The operation received scrutiny from other countries, mainly China and Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">USA-224</span> US spy satellite

USA-224, also known as NROL-49, is an American reconnaissance satellite. Launched in 2011 to replace the decade-old USA-161 satellite, it is the fifteenth KH-11 optical imaging satellite to reach orbit.

China's anti-satellite (ASAT) program has been under development since 1964. The ASAT program has since been moved from Program 640 to Program 863, the General Armaments Department and the State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense. Since its inception, the ASAT program has made progress on the development of three ASAT capable Systems: direct fire, directed-energy weapon, and microsatellites. Tests of these systems have either been directly acknowledged by the PRC, or reported on as ASAT capable. China is pursuing a broad and robust array of counterspace capabilities, which includes direct-ascent antisatellite missiles, co-orbital antisatellite systems, computer network operations, groundbased satellite jammers, and directed energy weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">USA-215</span> American radar reconnaissance satellite

USA-215, also known as NRO Launch 41 or NROL-41, is an American reconnaissance satellite, operated by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). Launched in 2010, it has been identified as the first in a new series of imaging radar satellites, developed as part of the Future Imagery Architecture (FIA) programme, to replace the earlier Lacrosse spacecraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">USA-247</span> American reconnaissance satellite

USA-247, also known as NRO Launch 39 or NROL-39, is an American reconnaissance satellite, operated by the National Reconnaissance Office and launched in December 2013. The USA-247 launch received a relatively high level of press coverage due to the mission's choice of logo, which depicts an octopus sitting astride the globe with the motto "Nothing Is Beyond Our Reach". The logo was extensively criticized in light of the surveillance disclosures in July 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mission Shakti</span> First Indian anti-satellite weapon test

On 27 March 2019, India tested an anti-satellite weapon (ASAT) during an operation code named Mission Shakti. The target of the test was a satellite present in a low Earth orbit, which was hit with a kinetic kill vehicle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kosmos 1408</span> Soviet artificial satellite destroyed by an ASAT missile

Kosmos-1408 was an electronic signals intelligence (ELINT) satellite operated by the Soviet Union. It was launched into low Earth orbit on 16 September 1982 at 14:55 UTC, replacing Kosmos-1378. It operated for around two years before becoming inactive and left in orbit.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jeffrey, James; Cartwright, James; Griffin, Michael D. (14 February 2008). "DoD News Briefing". U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved 17 February 2019.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  2. 1 2 3 "Display: USA 193 2006-057A". NASA. 14 May 2020. Retrieved 24 January 2021.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  3. ↑ "United Launch Alliance set for takeoff". Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation. Archived from the original on 1 April 2009. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  4. 1 2 3 4 "DoD Succeeds In Intercepting Non-Functioning Satellite" (Press release). U.S. Department of Defense. 20 February 2008. Retrieved 20 February 2008.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  5. 1 2 Taubman, Philip (11 November 2007). "In Death of Spy Satellite Program, Lofty Plans and Unrealistic Bids". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 February 2008.
  6. ↑ "E-305 New Radar Capability". globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 20 February 2008.
  7. ↑ Covault, Craig (6 February 2008). "Falling Radar Satellite Adds to NRO Troubles". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 21 May 2011. Retrieved 23 February 2008.
  8. ↑ "Table of Launches (NROL-21)". Jonathan's Space Report. 26 December 2006. Archived from the original on 11 February 2008. Retrieved 18 February 2011.
  9. ↑ Stewart, Erica (18 December 2006). "Vandenberg successfully launches Delta II". Air Force Space Command. 30th Space Wing Public Affairs. Archived from the original on 2 March 2008. Retrieved 22 February 2008.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  10. ↑ "Display: United States 193 Trajectory Details". National Space Science Data Center. NASA. Retrieved 22 February 2008.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  11. ↑ Harwood, William (14 February 2008). "U.S. plans to fire missile at falling spy satellite". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  12. ↑ Molczan, Ted (11 February 2008). "TJM obs of 2008 February 11 UTC; United States 193 elements". SatObs.org. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  13. ↑ Molczan, Ted (19 February 2008). "Updated elements of United States 193". SatObs.org. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  14. ↑ "Satellite could plummet to Earth". BBC News. 27 January 2008. Retrieved 18 February 2011.
  15. ↑ "U.S. Spy Satellite, Power Gone, May Hit Earth". The New York Times. 27 January 2008. Retrieved 18 February 2011.
  16. ↑ Molczan, Ted (27 January 2007). "USA 193 elements from observations". SatObs.org. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  17. ↑ "U.S. shoots down rogue satellite". News24. 21 February 2008. Archived from the original on 22 February 2008. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  18. ↑ Shanker, Thom (21 February 2008). "Missile Strikes a Spy Satellite Falling From Its Orbit". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 February 2011.
  19. ↑ Wingfield, Brian (21 February 2008). "A New Space Race?". Forbes. Retrieved 18 February 2011.
  20. ↑ FEMA (2008). "Memorandum To America's First Responder Community" (PDF). Fire Service Resources Network. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 February 2019. Retrieved 17 February 2019.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  21. ↑ Harris, Paul (27 January 2008). "U.S. warns out-of-control spy satellite is plunging to Earth". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  22. ↑ Baldor, Lolita C. (29 January 2008). "Large spy satellite could hit North America". NBC News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 15 October 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  23. ↑ Nebehay, Stephanie (15 February 2008). "U.S. vows to pay for damage caused by satellite". Reuters. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  24. ↑ Burns, Robert (15 February 2008). "Satellite Shootdown Plan Began in January 2008". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2 March 2008. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  25. ↑ McIntyre, Jamie; Mount, Mike (15 February 2008). "Attempt to shoot down spy satellite to cost up to US$60 million". CNN. Retrieved 5 February 2011.
  26. ↑ Mount, Mike (15 February 2008). "U.S. to try to shoot down errant satellite". CNN. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  27. ↑ "Response team formed to recover satellite debris". CTV Television Network. 21 February 2008. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2008.
  28. ↑ "Navy missile hits dying spy satellite, says Pentagon". CNN. 21 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  29. ↑ Roberts, Kristin (14 February 2008). "Pentagon plans to shoot down disabled satellite". Reuters. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  30. ↑ Shiga, David (20 January 2007). "Anti-satellite weapon used simple technology". New Scientist. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  31. 1 2 3 "U.S. spy satellite plan "a cover"". BBC News. 17 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  32. ↑ Schwartz, John (5 February 2008). "Satellite Spotters Glimpse Secrets, and Tell Them". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  33. ↑ Oberg, James (25 August 2008). "Assessing the hazards of space hydrazine, and the media reportage of it". The Space Review. Retrieved 17 February 2018.
  34. ↑ Shachtman, Noah (15 February 2008). "Experts Scoff at Sat Shoot-Down Rationale (Updated)". wired.com. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  35. ↑ Butt, Yousaf (2 September 2008). "On the technical study of USA-193's fuel tank reentry". The Space Review. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  36. ↑ Butt, Yousaf (21 August 2008). "Technical Comments on the U.S. Satellite Shootdown". The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  37. ↑ Kelley, Robert L.; Rochelle, William C. (August 2008). Atmospheric Reentry of a Hydrazine Tank (PDF) (Report). NASA. Retrieved 17 February 2019– via The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
  38. ↑ Siemer, Hannah (17 April 2009). "Littering fine paid". The Esperance Express. Archived from the original on 24 January 2011. Retrieved 23 September 2011.
  39. ↑ Chivers, Tom (21 February 2008). "Out-of-control satellite destroyed over Pacific". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 28 February 2011.
  40. 1 2 Data retrieved from the U.S. military's public satellite catalog maintained at "Space Track" . Retrieved 12 August 2013.
  41. ↑ "Rocket Delayed to Avoid Space Debris". USA Today. 28 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  42. 1 2 "SATCAT search". CelesTrak. Archived from the original on 15 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.