Ultrafiltration

Last updated

Ultrafiltration (UF) is a variety of membrane filtration in which forces such as pressure or concentration gradients lead to a separation through a semipermeable membrane. Suspended solids and solutes of high molecular weight are retained in the so-called retentate, while water and low molecular weight solutes pass through the membrane in the permeate (filtrate). This separation process is used in industry and research for purifying and concentrating macromolecular (103–106 Da) solutions, especially protein solutions.

Contents

Ultrafiltration is not fundamentally different from microfiltration. Both of these are separate based on size exclusion or particle capture. It is fundamentally different from membrane gas separation, which separate based on different amounts of absorption and different rates of diffusion. Ultrafiltration membranes are defined by the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of the membrane used. Ultrafiltration is applied in cross-flow or dead-end mode.

Applications

Industries such as chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturing, food and beverage processing, and waste water treatment, employ ultrafiltration in order to recycle flow or add value to later products. Blood dialysis also utilizes ultrafiltration.[ citation needed ]

Drinking water

Drinking water treatment 300 m /h using ultrafiltration in Grundmuhle waterworks (Germany) Ultrafiltration Grundmuhle.jpg
Drinking water treatment 300 m /h using ultrafiltration in Grundmühle waterworks (Germany)

Ultrafiltration can be used for the removal of particulates and macromolecules from raw water to produce potable water. It has been used to either replace existing secondary (coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation) and tertiary filtration (sand filtration and chlorination) systems employed in water treatment plants or as standalone systems in isolated regions with growing populations. [1] When treating water with high suspended solids, UF is often integrated into the process, utilising primary (screening, flotation, filtration) and some secondary treatments as pre-treatment stages. [2] UF processes are currently preferred over traditional treatment methods for the following reasons:

  • No chemicals required (aside from cleaning)
  • Constant product quality regardless of feed quality
  • Compact plant size
  • Capable of exceeding regulatory standards of water quality, achieving 90–100% pathogen removal [3]

UF processes are currently limited by the high cost incurred due to membrane fouling and replacement. [4] Additional pretreatment of feed water is required to prevent excessive damage to the membrane units.

In many cases UF is used for pre filtration in reverse osmosis (RO) plants to protect the RO membranes.[ citation needed ]

Protein concentration

UF is used extensively in the dairy industry; [5] particularly in the processing of cheese whey to obtain whey protein concentrate (WPC) and lactose-rich permeate. [6] [7] In a single stage, a UF process is able to concentrate the whey 10–30 times the feed. [8]
The original alternative to membrane filtration of whey was using steam heating followed by drum drying or spray drying. The product of these methods had limited applications due to its granulated texture and insolubility. Existing methods also had inconsistent product composition, high capital and operating costs and due to the excessive heat used in drying would often denature some of the proteins. [6]
Compared to traditional methods, UF processes used for this application: [6] [8]

  • Are more energy efficient
  • Have consistent product quality, 35–80% protein product depending on operating conditions
  • Do not denature proteins as they use moderate operating conditions

The potential for fouling is widely discussed, being identified as a significant contributor to decline in productivity. [6] [7] [8] Cheese whey contains high concentrations of calcium phosphate which can potentially lead to scale deposits on the membrane surface. As a result, substantial pretreatment must be implemented to balance pH and temperature of the feed to maintain solubility of calcium salts. [8]

A selectively permeable membrane can be mounted in a centrifuge tube. The buffer is forced through the membrane by centrifugation, leaving the protein in the upper chamber. Ultra filtration.JPG
A selectively permeable membrane can be mounted in a centrifuge tube. The buffer is forced through the membrane by centrifugation, leaving the protein in the upper chamber.

[9] === Other applications ===

  • Filtration of effluent from paper pulp mill
  • Cheese manufacture, see ultrafiltered milk
  • Removal of some bacteria from milk
  • Process and waste water treatment
  • Enzyme recovery
  • Fruit juice concentration and clarification
  • Dialysis and other blood treatments
  • Desalting and solvent-exchange of proteins (via diafiltration)
  • Laboratory grade manufacturing
  • Radiocarbon dating of bone collagen
  • Recovery of electrodeposition paints
  • Treatment of oil and latex emulsions
  • Recovery of lignin compounds in spent pulping liquors

Principles

The basic operating principle of ultrafiltration uses a pressure induced separation of solutes from a solvent through a semi permeable membrane. The relationship between the applied pressure on the solution to be separated and the flux through the membrane is most commonly described by the Darcy equation:

,

where J is the flux (flow rate per membrane area), TMP is the transmembrane pressure (pressure difference between feed and permeate stream), μ is solvent viscosity and Rt is the total resistance (sum of membrane and fouling resistance).[ citation needed ]

Membrane fouling

Concentration polarization

When filtration occurs the local concentration of rejected material at the membrane surface increases and can become saturated. In UF, increased ion concentration can develop an osmotic pressure on the feed side of the membrane. This reduces the effective TMP of the system, therefore reducing permeation rate. The increase in concentrated layer at the membrane wall decreases the permeate flux, due to increase in resistance which reduces the driving force for solvent to transport through membrane surface. CP affects almost all the available membrane separation processes. In RO, the solutes retained at the membrane layer results in higher osmotic pressure in comparison to the bulk stream concentration. So the higher pressures are required to overcome this osmotic pressure. Concentration polarisation plays a dominant role in ultrafiltration as compared to microfiltration because of the small pore size membrane. [10] Concentration polarization differs from fouling as it has no lasting effects on the membrane itself and can be reversed by relieving the TMP. It does however have a significant effect on many types of fouling. [11]

Types of fouling

Types of Foulants

[12] The following are the four categories by which foulants of UF membranes can be defined in:

  • biological substances
  • macromolecules
  • particulates
  • ions

Particulate deposition

The following models describe the mechanisms of particulate deposition on the membrane surface and in the pores:

  • Standard blocking: macromolecules are uniformly deposited on pore walls
  • Complete blocking: membrane pore is completely sealed by a macromolecule
  • Cake formation: accumulated particles or macromolecules form a fouling layer on the membrane surface, in UF this is also known as a gel layer
  • Intermediate blocking: when macromolecules deposit into pores or onto already blocked pores, contributing to cake formation [13]

Scaling

As a result of concentration polarization at the membrane surface, increased ion concentrations may exceed solubility thresholds and precipitate on the membrane surface. These inorganic salt deposits can block pores causing flux decline, membrane degradation and loss of production. The formation of scale is highly dependent on factors affecting both solubility and concentration polarization including pH, temperature, flow velocity and permeation rate. [14]

Biofouling

Microorganisms will adhere to the membrane surface forming a gel layer – known as biofilm. [15] The film increases the resistance to flow, acting as an additional barrier to permeation. In spiral-wound modules, blockages formed by biofilm can lead to uneven flow distribution and thus increase the effects of concentration polarization. [16]

Membrane arrangements

Hollow fibre module Kunstnier.JPG
Hollow fibre module

Depending on the shape and material of the membrane, different modules can be used for ultrafiltration process. [17] Commercially available designs in ultrafiltration modules vary according to the required hydrodynamic and economic constraints as well as the mechanical stability of the system under particular operating pressures. [18] The main modules used in industry include:

Tubular modules

The tubular module design uses polymeric membranes cast on the inside of plastic or porous paper components with diameters typically in the range of 5–25 mm with lengths from 0.6–6.4 m. [6] Multiple tubes are housed in a PVC or steel shell. The feed of the module is passed through the tubes, accommodating radial transfer of permeate to the shell side. This design allows for easy cleaning however the main drawback is its low permeability, high volume hold-up within the membrane and low packing density. [6] [18]

Hollow fibre

Self-supporting hollow fibre module ZeeWeed 500 ultrafiltration module at a NEWater plant.jpg
Self-supporting hollow fibre module

This design is conceptually similar to the tubular module with a shell and tube arrangement. A single module can consist of 50 to thousands of hollow fibres and therefore are self-supporting unlike the tubular design. The diameter of each fibre ranges from 0.2–3 mm with the feed flowing in the tube and the product permeate collected radially on the outside. The advantage of having self-supporting membranes as is the ease at which it can be cleaned due to its ability to be backflushed. Replacement costs however are high, as one faulty fibre will require the whole bundle to be replaced. Considering the tubes are of small diameter, using this design also makes the system prone to blockage. [8]

Spiral-wound modules

Spiral-wound membrane module Spiral flow membrane module-en.svg
Spiral-wound membrane module

Are composed of a combination of flat membrane sheets separated by a thin meshed spacer material which serves as a porous plastic screen support. These sheets are rolled around a central perforated tube and fitted into a tubular steel pressure vessel casing. The feed solution passes over the membrane surface and the permeate spirals into the central collection tube. Spiral-wound modules are a compact and cheap alternative in ultrafiltration design, offer a high volumetric throughput and can also be easily cleaned. [18] However it is limited by the thin channels where feed solutions with suspended solids can result in partial blockage of the membrane pores. [8]

Plate and frame

This uses a membrane placed on a flat plate separated by a mesh like material. The feed is passed through the system from which permeate is separated and collected from the edge of the plate. Channel length can range from 10–60 cm and channel heights from 0.5–1.0 mm. [8] This module provides low volume hold-up, relatively easy replacement of the membrane and the ability to feed viscous solutions because of the low channel height, unique to this particular design. [18]

Process characteristics

The process characteristics of a UF system are highly dependent on the type of membrane used and its application. Manufacturers' specifications of the membrane tend to limit the process to the following typical specifications: [19] [20] [21] [22]

Hollow FibreSpiral-woundCeramic TubularPlate and Frame
pH2–132–113–7
Feed Pressure (psi)9–15<30–12060–100
Backwash Pressure (psi)9–1520–4010–30
Temperature (°C)5–305–455–400
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L)<1000<600<500
Total Suspended Solids (mg/L)<500<450<300
Turbidity (NTU)<15<1<10
Iron (mg/L)<5<5<5
Oils and Greases (mg/L)<0.1<0.1<0.1
Solvents, phenols (mg/L)<0.1<0.1<0.1

Process design considerations

When designing a new membrane separation facility or considering its integration into an existing plant, there are many factors which must be considered. For most applications a heuristic approach can be applied to determine many of these characteristics to simplify the design process. Some design areas include:

Pre-treatment

Treatment of feed prior to the membrane is essential to prevent damage to the membrane and minimize the effects of fouling which greatly reduce the efficiency of the separation. Types of pre-treatment are often dependent on the type of feed and its quality. For example, in wastewater treatment, household waste and other particulates are screened. Other types of pre-treatment common to many UF processes include pH balancing and coagulation. [23] [24] Appropriate sequencing of each pre-treatment phase is crucial in preventing damage to subsequent stages. Pre-treatment can even be employed simply using dosing points.

Membrane specifications

Material

Most UF membranes use polymer materials (polysulfone, polypropylene, cellulose acetate, polylactic acid) however ceramic membranes are used for high temperature applications.[ citation needed ]

Pore size

A general rule for choice of pore size in a UF system is to use a membrane with a pore size one tenth that of the particle size to be separated. This limits the number of smaller particles entering the pores and adsorbing to the pore surface. Instead they block the entrance to the pores allowing simple adjustments of cross-flow velocity to dislodge them. [8]

Operation strategy

Schematic of cross flow operation. Cross Flow.png
Schematic of cross flow operation.
Schematic of dead-end operation Dead-end.svg
Schematic of dead-end operation

Flowtype

UF systems can either operate with cross-flow or dead-end flow. In dead-end filtration the flow of the feed solution is perpendicular to the membrane surface. On the other hand, in cross flow systems the flow passes parallel to the membrane surface. [25] Dead-end configurations are more suited to batch processes with low suspended solids as solids accumulate at the membrane surface therefore requiring frequent backflushes and cleaning to maintain high flux. Cross-flow configurations are preferred in continuous operations as solids are continuously flushed from the membrane surface resulting in a thinner cake layer and lower resistance to permeation.[ citation needed ]

Flow velocity

Flow velocity is especially critical for hard water or liquids containing suspensions in preventing excessive fouling. Higher cross-flow velocities can be used to enhance the sweeping effect across the membrane surface therefore preventing deposition of macromolecules and colloidal material and reducing the effects of concentration polarization. Expensive pumps are however required to achieve these conditions.[ citation needed ]

Flow temperature

To avoid excessive damage to the membrane, it is recommended to operate a plant at the temperature specified by the membrane manufacturer. In some instances however temperatures beyond the recommended region are required to minimise the effects of fouling. [24] Economic analysis of the process is required to find a compromise between the increased cost of membrane replacement and productivity of the separation.[ citation needed ]

Pressure

Typical two stage membrane process with recycle stream Multistage.png
Typical two stage membrane process with recycle stream

Pressure drops over multi-stage separation can result in a drastic decline in flux performance in the latter stages of the process. This can be improved using booster pumps to increase the TMP in the final stages. This will incur a greater capital and energy cost which will be offset by the improved productivity of the process. [24] With a multi-stage operation, retentate streams from each stage are recycled through the previous stage to improve their separation efficiency.

Multi-stage, multi-module

Multiple stages in series can be applied to achieve higher purity permeate streams. Due to the modular nature of membrane processes, multiple modules can be arranged in parallel to treat greater volumes. [26]

Post-treatment

Post-treatment of the product streams is dependent on the composition of the permeate and retentate and its end-use or government regulation. In cases such as milk separation both streams (milk and whey) can be collected and made into useful products. Additional drying of the retentate will produce whey powder. In the paper mill industry, the retentate (non-biodegradable organic material) is incinerated to recover energy and permeate (purified water) is discharged into waterways. It is essential for the permeate water to be pH balanced and cooled to avoid thermal pollution of waterways and altering its pH.[ citation needed ]

Cleaning

Cleaning of the membrane is done regularly to prevent the accumulation of foulants and reverse the degrading effects of fouling on permeability and selectivity.
Regular backwashing is often conducted every 10 min for some processes to remove cake layers formed on the membrane surface. [8] By pressurising the permeate stream and forcing it back through the membrane, accumulated particles can be dislodged, improving the flux of the process. Backwashing is limited in its ability to remove more complex forms of fouling such as biofouling, scaling or adsorption to pore walls. [27]
These types of foulants require chemical cleaning to be removed. The common types of chemicals used for cleaning are: [27] [28]

  • Acidic solutions for the control of inorganic scale deposits
  • Alkali solutions for removal of organic compounds
  • Biocides or disinfection such as chlorine or peroxide when bio-fouling is evident

When designing a cleaning protocol it is essential to consider:
Cleaning time – Adequate time must be allowed for chemicals to interact with foulants and permeate into the membrane pores. However, if the process is extended beyond its optimum duration it can lead to denaturation of the membrane and deposition of removed foulants. [27] The complete cleaning cycle including rinses between stages may take as long as 2 hours to complete. [29]
Aggressiveness of chemical treatment – With a high degree of fouling it may be necessary to employ aggressive cleaning solutions to remove fouling material. However, in some applications this may not be suitable if the membrane material is sensitive, leading to enhanced membrane ageing.
Disposal of cleaning effluent – The release of some chemicals into wastewater systems may be prohibited or regulated therefore this must be considered. For example, the use of phosphoric acid may result in high levels of phosphates entering water ways and must be monitored and controlled to prevent eutrophication.

Summary of common types of fouling and their respective chemical treatments [8]

FoulantReagentTime and
Temperature		Mode of Action
Fats and oils, proteins,
polysaccharides, bacteria		0.5 M NaOH
with 200 ppm Cl2		30–60 min
25–55 °C		Hydrolysis and
oxidation
DNA, mineral salts0.1–0.5 M acid
(acetic, citric, nitric)		30–60 min
25–35 °C		Solubilization
Fats, oils,
biopolymers,
proteins		0.1% SDS,
0.1% Triton X-100 		30 min – overnight
25–55 °C		Wetting, emulsifying,
suspending, dispersing
Cell fragments, fats,
oils, proteins		Enzyme detergents30 min – overnight
30–40 °C		Catalytic breakdown
DNA0.5% DNAase30 min – overnight
20–40 °C		Enzyme hydrolysis

New developments

In order to increase the life-cycle of membrane filtration systems, energy efficient membranes are being developed in membrane bioreactor systems. Technology has been introduced which allows the power required to aerate the membrane for cleaning to be reduced whilst still maintaining a high flux level. Mechanical cleaning processes have also been adopted using granulates as an alternative to conventional forms of cleaning; this reduces energy consumption and also reduces the area required for filtration tanks. [30]

Membrane properties have also been enhanced to reduce fouling tendencies by modifying surface properties. This can be noted in the biotechnology industry where membrane surfaces have been altered in order to reduce the amount of protein binding. [31] Ultrafiltration modules have also been improved to allow for more membrane for a given area without increasing its risk of fouling by designing more efficient module internals.

The current pre-treatment of seawater desulphonation uses ultrafiltration modules that have been designed to withstand high temperatures and pressures whilst occupying a smaller footprint. Each module vessel is self supported and resistant to corrosion and accommodates easy removal and replacement of the module without the cost of replacing the vessel itself. [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Filtration</span> Process that separates solids from fluids


Filtration is a physical separation process that separates solid matter and fluid from a mixture using a filter medium that has a complex structure through which only the fluid can pass. Solid particles that cannot pass through the filter medium are described as oversize and the fluid that passes through is called the filtrate. Oversize particles may form a filter cake on top of the filter and may also block the filter lattice, preventing the fluid phase from crossing the filter, known as blinding. The size of the largest particles that can successfully pass through a filter is called the effective pore size of that filter. The separation of solid and fluid is imperfect; solids will be contaminated with some fluid and filtrate will contain fine particles. Filtration occurs both in nature and in engineered systems; there are biological, geological, and industrial forms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Semipermeable membrane</span> Membrane which will allow certain molecules or ions to pass through it by diffusion

Semipermeable membrane is a type of biological or synthetic, polymeric membrane that allows certain molecules or ions to pass through it by osmosis. The rate of passage depends on the pressure, concentration, and temperature of the molecules or solutes on either side, as well as the permeability of the membrane to each solute. Depending on the membrane and the solute, permeability may depend on solute size, solubility, properties, or chemistry. How the membrane is constructed to be selective in its permeability will determine the rate and the permeability. Many natural and synthetic materials which are rather thick are also semipermeable. One example of this is the thin film on the inside of an egg.

Microfiltration is a type of physical filtration process where a contaminated fluid is passed through a special pore-sized membrane filter to separate microorganisms and suspended particles from process liquid. It is commonly used in conjunction with various other separation processes such as ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis to provide a product stream which is free of undesired contaminants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forward osmosis</span> Water purification process

Forward osmosis (FO) is an osmotic process that, like reverse osmosis (RO), uses a semi-permeable membrane to effect separation of water from dissolved solutes. The driving force for this separation is an osmotic pressure gradient, such that a "draw" solution of high concentration, is used to induce a net flow of water through the membrane into the draw solution, thus effectively separating the feed water from its solutes. In contrast, the reverse osmosis process uses hydraulic pressure as the driving force for separation, which serves to counteract the osmotic pressure gradient that would otherwise favor water flux from the permeate to the feed. Hence significantly more energy is required for reverse osmosis compared to forward osmosis.

An artificial membrane, or synthetic membrane, is a synthetically created membrane which is usually intended for separation purposes in laboratory or in industry. Synthetic membranes have been successfully used for small and large-scale industrial processes since the middle of the twentieth century. A wide variety of synthetic membranes is known. They can be produced from organic materials such as polymers and liquids, as well as inorganic materials. Most commercially utilized synthetic membranes in industry are made of polymeric structures. They can be classified based on their surface chemistry, bulk structure, morphology, and production method. The chemical and physical properties of synthetic membranes and separated particles as well as separation driving force define a particular membrane separation process. The most commonly used driving forces of a membrane process in industry are pressure and concentration gradient. The respective membrane process is therefore known as filtration. Synthetic membranes utilized in a separation process can be of different geometry and flow configurations. They can also be categorized based on their application and separation regime. The best known synthetic membrane separation processes include water purification, reverse osmosis, dehydrogenation of natural gas, removal of cell particles by microfiltration and ultrafiltration, removal of microorganisms from dairy products, and dialysis.

Electrodialysis reversal (EDR) is an electrodialysis reversal water desalination membrane process that has been commercially used since the early 1960s. An electric current migrates dissolved salt ions, including fluorides, nitrates and sulfates, through an electrodialysis stack consisting of alternating layers of cationic and anionic ion exchange membranes. Periodically, the direction of ion flow is reversed by reversing the polarity of the applied electric current.

Solar desalination is a desalination technique powered by solar energy. The two common methods are direct (thermal) and indirect (photovoltaic).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cross-flow filtration</span>

In chemical engineering, biochemical engineering and protein purification, crossflow filtration is a type of filtration. Crossflow filtration is different from dead-end filtration in which the feed is passed through a membrane or bed, the solids being trapped in the filter and the filtrate being released at the other end. Cross-flow filtration gets its name because the majority of the feed flow travels tangentially across the surface of the filter, rather than into the filter. The principal advantage of this is that the filter cake is substantially washed away during the filtration process, increasing the length of time that a filter unit can be operational. It can be a continuous process, unlike batch-wise dead-end filtration.

Nanofiltration is a membrane filtration process that uses nanometer sized pores through which particles smaller than about 1–10 nanometers pass through the membrane. Nanofiltration membranes have pore sizes of about 1–10 nanometers, smaller than those used in microfiltration and ultrafiltration, but a slightly bigger than those in reverse osmosis. Membranes used are predominantly polymer thin films. It is used to soften, disinfect, and remove impurities from water, and to purify or separate chemicals such as pharmaceuticals.

A solar-powered desalination unit produces potable water from saline water through direct or indirect methods of desalination powered by sunlight. Solar energy is the most promising renewable energy source due to its ability to drive the more popular thermal desalination systems directly through solar collectors and to drive physical and chemical desalination systems indirectly through photovoltaic cells.

Membrane bioreactors are combinations of some membrane processes like microfiltration or ultrafiltration with a biological wastewater treatment process, the activated sludge process. These technologies are now widely used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment. The two basic membrane bioreactor configurations are the submerged membrane bioreactor and the side stream membrane bioreactor. In the submerged configuration, the membrane is located inside the biological reactor and submerged in the wastewater, while in a side stream membrane bioreactor, the membrane is located outside the reactor as an additional step after biological treatment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Membrane fouling</span>

Membrane fouling is a process whereby a solution or a particle is deposited on a membrane surface or in membrane pores in a processes such as in a membrane bioreactor, reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, membrane distillation, ultrafiltration, microfiltration, or nanofiltration so that the membrane's performance is degraded. It is a major obstacle to the widespread use of this technology. Membrane fouling can cause severe flux decline and affect the quality of the water produced. Severe fouling may require intense chemical cleaning or membrane replacement. This increases the operating costs of a treatment plant. There are various types of foulants: colloidal, biological, organic and scaling.

Reverse osmosis (RO) is a water purification process that uses a semi-permeable membrane to separate water molecules from other substances. RO applies pressure to overcome osmotic pressure that favors even distributions. RO can remove dissolved or suspended chemical species as well as biological substances, and is used in industrial processes and the production of potable water. RO retains the solute on the pressurized side of the membrane and the purified solvent passes to the other side. It relies on the relative sizes of the various molecules to decide what passes through. "Selective" membranes reject large molecules, while accepting smaller molecules.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Membrane</span> Thin, film-like structure separating two fluids, acting as a selective barrier

A membrane is a selective barrier; it allows some things to pass through but stops others. Such things may be molecules, ions, or other small particles. Membranes can be generally classified into synthetic membranes and biological membranes. Biological membranes include cell membranes ; nuclear membranes, which cover a cell nucleus; and tissue membranes, such as mucosae and serosae. Synthetic membranes are made by humans for use in laboratories and industry.

Membrane technology encompasses the scientific processes used in the construction and application of membranes. Membranes are used to facilitate the transport or rejection of substances between mediums, and the mechanical separation of gas and liquid streams. In the simplest case, filtration is achieved when the pores of the membrane are smaller than the diameter of the undesired substance, such as a harmful microorganism. Membrane technology is commonly used in industries such as water treatment, chemical and metal processing, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, the food industry, as well as the removal of environmental pollutants.

Membrane distillation (MD) is a thermally driven separation process in which separation is driven by phase change. A hydrophobic membrane presents a barrier for the liquid phase, allowing the vapour phase to pass through the membrane's pores. The driving force of the process is a partial vapour pressure difference commonly triggered by a temperature difference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hollow fiber membrane</span> Class of artificial membranes containing a semi-permeable hollow fiber barrier

Hollow fiber membranes (HFMs) are a class of artificial membranes containing a semi-permeable barrier in the form of a hollow fiber. Originally developed in the 1960s for reverse osmosis applications, hollow fiber membranes have since become prevalent in water treatment, desalination, cell culture, medicine, and tissue engineering. Most commercial hollow fiber membranes are packed into cartridges which can be used for a variety of liquid and gaseous separations.

Phase inversion or phase separation is a chemical phenomenon exploited in the fabrication of artificial membranes. It is performed by removing the solvent from a liquid-polymer solution, leaving a porous, solid membrane.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nidal Hilal</span>

Nidal Hilal DSc PhD EurIng CEng FIChemE FLSW FRSC is an academic, engineering scientist and scientific adviser. He is a Global Network Professor at New York University and the Founding Director and Principal Investigator of NYUAD Water Research Center. He held professorships at the University of Nottingham and Swansea University in the United Kingdom. He is an Emeritus Professor of Engineering at Swansea University and the Founding Director of the Centre for Water Advanced Technologies and Environmental Research (CWATER).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Membrane scaling</span> The article is about "membrane scaling" which is a major challenge in the water treatment of RO.

Membrane scaling is when one or more sparingly soluble salts precipitate and form a dense layer on the membrane surface in reverse osmosis (RO) applications. Figures 1 and 2 show scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the RO membrane surface without and with scaling, respectively. Membrane scaling, like other types of membrane fouling, increases energy costs due to higher operating pressure, and reduces permeate water production. Furthermore, scaling may damage and shorten the lifetime of membranes due to frequent membrane cleanings and therefore it is a major operational challenge in RO applications.

References

  1. ↑ Clever, M.; Jordt, F.; Knauf, R.; Räbiger, N.; Rüdebusch, M.; Hilker-Scheibel, R. (1 December 2000). "Process water production from river water by ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis". Desalination. 131 (1–3): 325–336. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90031-6.
  2. ↑ Laîné, J.-M.; Vial, D.; Moulart, Pierre (1 December 2000). "Status after 10 years of operation — overview of UF technology today". Desalination. 131 (1–3): 17–25. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(00)90002-X.
  3. ↑ American Water Works Association Research Foundation ... Ed. group Joël Mallevialle (1996). Water treatment membrane processes. New York [u.a.]: McGraw Hill. ISBN   9780070015593.
  4. ↑ Edwards, David; Donn, Alasdair; Meadowcroft, Charlotte (1 May 2001). "Membrane solution to a "significant risk" Cryptosporidium groundwater source". Desalination. 137 (1–3): 193–198. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00218-1.
  5. ↑ Villecco F., Aquino R.P., Calabrò V., Corrente M.I., D’Amore M., Grasso A., Naddeo V. (2020). "Fuzzy-assisted ultrafiltration of whey by-products recovery". Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration. 5. doi:10.1007/s41207-019-0138-5. S2CID   212655195.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tamime, A. Y. (12 December 2012). Membrane Processing Dairy and Beverage Applications. Chicester: Wiley. ISBN   978-1118457023.
  7. 1 2 Nigam, Mayank Omprakash; Bansal, Bipan; Chen, Xiao Dong (1 January 2008). "Fouling and cleaning of whey protein concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes". Desalination. 218 (1–3): 313–322. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.027.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cheryan, Munir (1998). Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook. CRC Press. ISBN   1420069020.
  9. ↑ Ann-Sofi Jönsson, Gun Trägårdh, Ultrafiltration applications, Desalination, Volume 77, 1990, Pages 135-179, ISSN 0011-9164, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(90)85024-5
  10. ↑ Brian, P.L., 1965, Concentration polarization in reverse osmosis desalination with variable flux and incomplete salt rejection, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 4: 439−445.
  11. ↑ Rizvi, Anil Kumar; Pabby, Ana Maria; Sastre, Syed S.H., eds. (2007). Handbook of membrane separations : chemical, pharmaceutical, and biotechnological applications. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press. ISBN   978-0-8493-9549-9.
  12. ↑ Rouzan Shoshaa, Mohammad Y. Ashfaq, Mohammad A. Al-Ghouti, Recent developments in ultrafiltration membrane technology for the removal of potentially toxic elements, and enhanced antifouling performance: A review, Environmental Technology & Innovation, Volume 31, 2023, 103162, ISSN 2352-1864, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103162
  13. ↑ Bruijn, J P F; Salazar, F N; Borquez, R (September 2005). "Membrane blocking in ultrafiltration: A new approach to fouling". Food and Bioproducts Processing. 83 (3): 211–219. doi:10.1205/fbp.04012.
  14. ↑ Antony, Alice; Low, Jor How; Gray, Stephen; Childress, Amy E.; Le-Clech, Pierre; Leslie, Greg (1 November 2011). "Scale formation and control in high pressure membrane water treatment systems: A review". Journal of Membrane Science. 383 (1–2): 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.054.
  15. ↑ Flemming, H.-C.; Schaule, G.; Griebe, T.; Schmitt, J.; Tamachkiarowa, A. (1 November 1997). "Biofouling—the Achilles heel of membrane processes". Desalination. 113 (2–3): 215–225. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(97)00132-X.
  16. ↑ Baker, J.S.; Dudley, L.Y. (1 September 1998). "Biofouling in membrane systems — A review". Desalination. 118 (1–3): 81–89. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00091-5.
  17. ↑ Futselaar, Harry; Weijenberg, Dick C. (1 September 1998). "System design for large-scale ultrafiltration applications". Desalination. 119 (1–3): 217–224. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00159-3.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Belfort, Georges (1 February 1988). "Membrane modules: comparison of different configurations using fluid mechanics". Journal of Membrane Science. 35 (3): 245–270. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80299-9.
  19. ↑ Koch Membrane Systems. "Membrane Products". Koch Membrane Systems. Retrieved 9 October 2013.
  20. ↑ US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation. "Water Treatment Primer for Communities in Need" (PDF). US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
  21. ↑ Con-Serv Manufacturing. "Operation and Maintenance Manual - UF-6-HF Ultrafiltration System" (PDF). Con-Serv Manufacturing. Retrieved 10 October 2013.
  22. ↑ Laîné; prepared by Joseph G. Jacangelo, Samer Adham, Jean-Michel (1997). Membrane filtration for microbial removal. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association. ISBN   0898678943.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. ↑ Water, Sydney. "Rosehill Recycled Water Scheme - Fairfield Recycled Water Plant" (PDF). Sydney Water.
  24. 1 2 3 Nordin, Anna-Karin; Jönsson, Ann-Sofi (1 November 2006). "Case study of an ultrafiltration plant treating bleach plant effluent from a pulp and paper mill". Desalination. 201 (1–3): 277–289. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.06.004.
  25. ↑ Farahbakhsh, Khosrow; Adham, Samer S.; Smith, Daniel W. (June 2003). "Monitoring the Integrity of Low-Pressure Membranes". Journal AWWA. 95 (6): 95–107. doi:10.1002/j.1551-8833.2003.tb10390.x. S2CID   116774106.
  26. ↑ American Water Works Association Research Foundation ... Ed. group Joël Mallevialle (1996). Water treatment membrane processes. New York [u.a.]: McGraw Hill. ISBN   0070015597.
  27. 1 2 3 Cui, edited by Z.F.; Muralidhara, H.S. (2010). Membrane technology : a practical guide to membrane technology and applications in food and bioprocessing (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 213*254. ISBN   978-1-85617-632-3.{{cite book}}: |first= has generic name (help)
  28. ↑ Gao, Wei; Liang, Heng; Ma, Jun; Han, Mei; Chen, Zhong-lin; Han, Zheng-shuang; Li, Gui-bai (1 May 2011). "Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review". Desalination. 272 (1–3): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051.
  29. ↑ Wallberg, Ola; Jönsson, Ann-Sofi; Wickström, Peter (1 December 2001). "Membrane cleaning — a case study in a sulphite pulp mill bleach plant". Desalination. 141 (3): 259–268. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(01)85004-9.
  30. 1 2 Bennett, Anthony (1 November 2012). "Membrane technology: Developments in ultrafiltration technologies". Filtration + Separation. 49 (6): 28–33. doi:10.1016/S0015-1882(12)70287-2.
  31. ↑ Ag, S (1 September 2012). "Energy-efficient membrane is designed for MBR systems". Membrane Technology. 2012 (9): 4. doi:10.1016/S0958-2118(12)70178-7.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.