Vanth (moon)

Last updated

Vanth
Orcus-Vanth orbit.gif
Vanth (smaller object) orbiting Orcus, imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope.
Discovery [1]
Discovered by
Discovery date13 November 2005
Designations
Designation
(90482) Orcus I [3] :350
Pronunciation /ˈvænθ/
Named after
Vanth
S/2005 (90482) 1 [4]
Adjectives Vanthian
Orbital characteristics [5] :67
Epoch 21.5 September 2006 (JD 2454000.0)
8999.8±9.1  km
Eccentricity 0.00091±0.00053
9.539154±0.000020  d
Inclination 105.03° ±0.18° (to celestial equator)
90.54°±0.17° (to ecliptic) [a]
53.49°±0.33°
274.51° [b]
Satellite of Orcus
Physical characteristics
442.5±10.2 km (occultation) [6] :663
475±75  km (thermal) [7] :1 [8] :2
Mass (8.7±0.8)×1019 kg [8] :4
Mean density
1.9±0.3 g/cm3 (occultation) [c]
1.5+1.0
−0.5
 g/cm3
(thermal) [8] :4
synchronous [9] :6 [10]
Albedo 0.08±0.02 [7]
Temperature <44 K [6] :663
Spectral type
moderately red [11] :2702
V–I = 1.03±0.05 [11] :2702
21.8 [12]
4.88±0.05 [11] :2702

    Vanth (formal designation (90482) Orcus I; provisional designation S/2005 (90482) 1) is a natural satellite or moon of the large trans-Neptunian dwarf planet Orcus. It was discovered by Michael Brown and Terry-Ann Suer using images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope on 13 November 2005. The moon has a diameter of 443 km (275 mi), making it about half the size of Orcus and the third-largest moon of a trans-Neptunian object. Vanth is massive enough that it shifts the barycenter of the Orcus–Vanth system outside of Orcus, forming a binary system in which the two bodies revolve around the barycenter, much like the PlutoCharon system. It is hypothesized that both systems formed similarly, most likely by a giant impact early in the Solar System's history. [8] Compared to Orcus, Vanth has a darker and slightly redder surface that supposedly lacks exposed water ice, resembling primordial Kuiper belt objects. [11] :2702

    Contents

    Discovery

    Vanth was discovered in Hubble Space Telescope images taken on 13 November 2005, during Michael Brown's survey for satellites around large trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) using Hubble's high-resolution Advanced Camera for Surveys. [1] [13] After Brown's Hubble survey concluded in late 2006, he and his colleague Terry-Ann Suer reported their newly discovered TNO satellites to the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, which announced their discovery of Vanth alongside three other TNO satellites on 22 February 2007. [13] [1] Brown continued observing the Orcus–Vanth system with Hubble in October–December 2006 and November–December 2007 to better determine the moon's orbit. [14] [15] [12]

    Name

    Before Vanth was named, it had the provisional designation S/2005 (90482) 1. [4] [d] On 23 March 2009, Brown asked readers of his blog to suggest possible names for the satellite, with the best one to be submitted to the International Astronomical Union (IAU) on 5 April. [16] The name Vanth, the winged Etruscan psychopomp who guides the souls of the dead to the underworld, was first suggested by Sonya Taaffe—a fiction writer—and became the most popular name among the large pool of suggestions. [17] [18]

    Vanth and Persipnei were among the few names that both matched the Etruscan origin and chthonic theme of Orcus's name, though Brown ultimately chose Vanth because its relationship to Orcus in Etruscan mythology strongly parallels the relationship between Pluto and Charon in Greek mythology. [17] In Etruscan iconography, Vanth is frequently portrayed in the company of Charun (the Etruscan counterpart of the Greek Charon), which alludes to the similar properties of the Pluto and Orcus systems (the latter being nicknamed the "anti-Pluto" because the orbital resonance with Neptune keeps it on the opposite side of the Sun from Pluto). [17] Brown quoted Taaffe as saying that if Vanth "accompanies dead souls from the moment of death to the underworld itself, then of course her face is turned always toward Orcus", a reference to the likely synchronous orbit of Vanth about Orcus. [17] [18]

    The submission for Vanth's name was assessed and approved by the IAU's Committee for Small Body Nomenclature, [e] in agreement with the naming procedures for minor planets and satellites. [19] The official naming citation was announced by the Minor Planet Center in a notice published on 30 March 2010. [3] :350

    Observability

    Visual

    From Earth, Vanth appears very close to Orcus with an angular separation of up to 0.25 arcseconds. For this reason, Vanth can only be visually resolved in high-resolution imaging, which requires the use of large-aperture space telescopes or ground-based telescopes aided by adaptive optics or interferometry. [20] :2 In visible light, Vanth's apparent magnitude is about 22, which is 2.61 magnitudes fainter than Orcus or about 9% of Orcus's brightness. [12] [20] :5 Orcus and Vanth will gradually brighten as the system draws closer to the Sun until perihelion in 2142. [12]

    Occultations

    Stellar occultations are a useful way of directly measuring an object's position, size, and shape, and can be predicted when the object's orbital trajectory is well-known. [6] :657 The first successful detection of a stellar occultation by Vanth was made by a single observatory in Hokkaido, Japan on 1 March 2014, which detected the occultation lasting 3 seconds. [21] [22] :16 Because this was only a single detection of the occulted star's chord across Vanth, the occultation did not provide a meaningful constraint on Vanth's diameter and shape. [6] :665 On 7 March 2017, another stellar occultation by Vanth was observed in the Americas and the Pacific Ocean. [6] :657 Of the five observatories that participated in observing the 2017 occultation by Vanth, two of them made positive detections. [6] :660 The remaining observatories that did not detect the occultation, alongside the fact that the occulted star was a double star, tightly constrained the range of Vanth's possible diameters to 432–453 km (268–281 mi), with the assumption that Vanth had a spherical shape. [6] :663 The 2017 occultation showed no signs of an atmosphere on Vanth, which places an upper bound pressure of 1–4  microbars for a potential atmosphere. The 2017 occultation also showed no signs of rings within 10,000 km (6,200 mi) from Vanth or beyond 8,010 km (4,980 mi) from Orcus. [6] :657

    Orbit

    Diagram of Vanth's orbit as viewed face-on from Earth. Vanth appears to revolve counterclockwise because its orbital north pole is pointed toward Earth's line of sight. Orcus Vanth orbit.png
    Diagram of Vanth's orbit as viewed face-on from Earth. Vanth appears to revolve counterclockwise because its orbital north pole is pointed toward Earth's line of sight.

    Vanth forms a binary system with Orcus, in which the two bodies revolve around the barycenter between them. Orcus and Vanth are separated 9,000 km (5,600 mi) apart from each other's centers and revolve around their barycenter in nearly circular orbits with a period of 9.54 days. [5] :67 [8] Vanth is less massive than Orcus, so it is the secondary component of the binary system and it orbits farther out from the barycenter at an orbital radius of 7,770 km (4,830 mi; 86.3% of the Orcus–Vanth separation distance). The more massive primary component, Orcus, orbits closer to the barycenter at an orbital radius of 1,230 km (760 mi; 13.7% of the separation distance). [f] [8] :4

    Vanth's orbit is inclined perpendicularly (90°) with respect to the plane of the Solar System. During the time Vanth was observed (2005–2023), the north pole of its orbit was pointed towards Earth such that Vanth's orbit appeared face-on or pole-on from Earth's perspective. [11] :2700–2701 [8] :4 The perspective of Vanth's orbital plane shifts very slowly as the Orcus–Vanth system travels along its 247-year orbit around the Sun. [4] Because of this slow shift in perspective, astronomers were not able determine Vanth's actual orbital inclination until 2015. [5] :67 Vanth's orbit will eventually shift from a face-on to an edge-on perspective by the year 2082, after which the Orcus–Vanth system begins its season of mutual events where Orcus and Vanth take turns eclipsing and transiting each other. [5] :67

    Origin

    The circular orbits and relative component sizes of the Orcus–Vanth system bear similarities to the Pluto–Charon binary system, which led astronomers to suspect that these two systems formed and evolved similarly. [11] :2705 [8] :5 As hypothesized for Charon, Vanth is believed to be a captured fragment of a large body that impacted Orcus likely before the outward migration of Neptune 700 million years after the formation of the Solar System (about 4 billion years ago). [8] :5 [23] :805 Hydrodynamic simulations by researchers Sota Arakawa et al. in 2019 suggested that an impactor traveling close to Orcus's escape velocity should impact Orcus at an oblique angle greater than 45° for it to leave a large, intact fragment in orbit around Orcus. [8] :5 [23] :804 This fragment, which would become Vanth, would initially have an eccentric orbit close to Orcus. [23] :804 Arakawa et al.'s simulations predicted that both Orcus and Vanth should remain molten for at least 10,000 years for tidal interactions to tidally lock both components and expand and circularize Vanth's orbit before the present day. [23] :804, 806 Earlier calculations by Michael Brown et al. in 2010 suggested that it took 150–400 million years for both components of the Orcus–Vanth system to migrate out to their current separation distance and become tidally locked. [11] :2704

    An impact origin of the Orcus and Vanth system would imply that both components should have similar densities, surface compositions, and colors. [11] :2702 While Vanth does have a similar density to Orcus (albeit with large uncertainty), [8] :5 Vanth appears redder and tentative spectroscopic studies have suggested that it has low amounts of exposed water ice, which may make it resemble primordial Kuiper belt objects more than Orcus, whose surface has a neutral (gray) color and is abundant in exposed water ice by contrast. [11] :2702 [20] :5 While the uncertain nature of Orcus and Vanth's compositional difference does not necessarily refute the impact hypothesis, it does lend plausibility to alternative hypotheses for Vanth's origin, such as the gravitational capture of a Kuiper belt object. [20] :5 However, these alternative hypotheses have since fallen out of favor as Vanth's physical properties and formation mechanisms of dwarf planet satellites became better understood. [7] :1 [8]

    Physical characteristics

    Size, mass, and density

    Diagram of the three largest binary trans-Neptunian dwarf planets and their satellites with true colors, diameters, and distances to scale. Each system's barycenter position marked is in red crosshairs. Binary dwarf planets scale comparison.png
    Diagram of the three largest binary trans-Neptunian dwarf planets and their satellites with true colors, diameters, and distances to scale. Each system's barycenter position marked is in red crosshairs.

    As of 2023, the most accurate estimate for Vanth's diameter is 443 ± 10 km (275 ± 6 mi), determined from a stellar occultation in 2017. [6] :663,665 [8] :2 This estimate is consistent with the previous estimate of 475 ± 75 km (295 ± 47 mi) from thermal emission measurements by the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) in 2016. [6] :664 [7] :2 Both estimates show that Vanth is roughly half of Orcus's diameter and is the third-largest known moon of a trans-Neptunian object, after Charon and Dysnomia. [7] :3 [8] :2

    Vanth is massive enough that it gravitationally forces Orcus into orbit around the system's barycenter. High-resolution imaging by ALMA resolved Orcus's barycentric orbital motion in 2016, which showed that the barycenter lay 13.7%±1.3% along the separation distance from Orcus to Vanth. [8] :4 This indicates Vanth has a mass of (8.7±0.8)×1019 kg. [f] [8] :4 Of all known planet and dwarf planet satellite systems, Vanth is the most massive satellite relative to its primary: the ratio of Vanth's mass to Orcus's mass is 16%±2%, which is greater than the Pluto–Charon binary's mass ratio of 12%. [8] :5

    Vanth appears to have a similar density as Orcus, despite there being large uncertainties in current estimates for Vanth's density. [8] :5 According to ALMA measurements for Vanth's diameter and mass, Vanth's density is 1.5+0.5
    −1.0
     g/cm3
    . [8] :4 Using the occultation estimate for Vanth's diameter instead of ALMA yields a higher density of 1.9±0.3 g/cm3. [c] If Vanth's density is indeed similar to Orcus's, this would support an impact origin for the system. [8] :5 Nevertheless, additional observations of the Orcus–Vanth system are needed to refine Vanth's mass and density before any conclusions could be made about Vanth's origin and interior structure. [8] :5

    Surface

    Visible and near-infrared Hubble observations of Vanth from 2007–2008 showed that the moon's surface appears moderately red, being increasingly more reflective over longer and redder wavelengths. [11] :2702 Vanth's surface is expected to be devoid of volatile ices such as ammonia and methane, since Vanth is too small for its gravity to prevent gases from escaping into space. [24] :8 Near-infrared spectroscopy by the Very Large Telescope in 2010 confirmed Vanth's reddish color but did not conclusively detect signs of water ice in Vanth's spectrum due to the low resolution of the observations. [20] :5 Nevertheless, Vanth's reddish spectrum appears consistent with a low water ice abundance on its surface, which suggests that its surface composition may be similar to those of tholin-covered Kuiper belt objects. [11] :2702 [20] :5 Vanth's reddish color and apparent lack of exposed water ice hinted that it should have a dark surface with a geometric albedo lower than that of Orcus; [11] :2704 [9] :6 this was confirmed in ALMA observations from 2016, which determined a geometric albedo of 0.08 for Vanth based on its thermal emission. [7] :3

    Light curve, rotation, and shape

    Due to the pole-on perspective of the Orcus–Vanth system from Earth, a large portion of the components' surfaces stay in view as they rotate, resulting in minuscule changes in brightness that make it difficult for astronomers to study the system's light curve. [11] :2704 In addition, Orcus and Vanth orbit so close to each other that most telescopes on Earth cannot resolve them individually, so the light curves from each component are combined as a single light curve. [9] :2 Continuous photometric observations of the unresolved Orcus–Vanth system in 2009–2010 showed that its overall brightness varies with a small light curve amplitude of 0.06±0.04 magnitudes and a period of 9.7±0.3 days. [9] :3 This roughly coincides with Vanth's 9.54-day orbital period, which indicates there is synchronous rotation in one or both of the system's components. [9] :3 At least one of these synchronously rotating components must have either an elongated shape or surface albedo variations to cause these brightness variations. [9] :3 Researchers José Luis Ortiz et al. suggested in 2011 that at least Vanth must be synchronously rotating according to the Orcus–Vanth system's light curve, [9] :3 whereas David Rabinowitz and Yasi Owainati argued in 2014 that the system's variability should most likely come from both components, meaning the Orcus–Vanth system should be doubly synchronous. [10]

    No individually-resolved light curve for Vanth has been measured yet, so its shape is unknown. [6] :663 Vanth's diameter lies close to the ~400 km (250 mi) threshold for hydrostatic equilibrium for the moons of Saturn and Uranus, so Vanth would probably not be massive enough to gravitationally compress itself into a sphere, especially in the cold temperatures of the Kuiper belt (below 44  K ; −229  °C) [6] :663 where ice and rock are more rigid. [25] :75 [26] :176

    Notes

    1. Given Vanth's orbit pole ecliptic latitude of −0.54°±0.17°, [5] :67 subtracting this angle from the ecliptic north pole of +90° gives the inclination with respect to the ecliptic: i = +90° – (–0.54°) = +90.54°.
    2. Grundy et al. (2019) only give the longitude of periapsis for Vanth's orbit, which is 328°±51°. [5] :67 The longitude of periapsis is the sum of the ascending node and argument of periapsis, so subtracting Vanth's ascending node of 53.49°±0.33° from its longitude of periapsis gives 274.51° for its argument of periapsis.
    3. 1 2 Brown and Butler (2023) did not calculate Vanth's density for its occultation-derived diameter of 442.5±10.2 km. [8] :2 Using correct units, dividing Vanth's estimated mass of (8.7±0.8)×1019 kg by the spherical volume of the occultation-derived diameter gives a density of approximately 1.9±0.3 g/cm3.
    4. In his blog posts, Michael Brown wrote Vanth's provisional designation as S/1 90482 (2005), which is a not a standard way of writing satellite provisional designations. [16] [17]
    5. The IAU's Committee for Small Body Nomenclature is now known as the Working Group Small Body Nomenclature.
    6. 1 2 In a two-body binary system, the ratio of the primary body's (Orcus) orbital radius (r1) from the barycenter to the system's separation distance (a) is equivalent to the ratio of the secondary's (Vanth) mass (m2) to the system's total mass (m1 + m2):

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Double planet</span> A binary system where two planetary-mass objects share an orbital axis external to both

    In astronomy, a double planet is a binary satellite system where both objects are planets, or planetary-mass objects, and whose joint barycenter is external to both planetary bodies.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Kuiper belt</span> Area of the Solar System beyond the planets, comprising small bodies

    The Kuiper belt is a circumstellar disc in the outer Solar System, extending from the orbit of Neptune at 30 astronomical units (AU) to approximately 50 AU from the Sun. It is similar to the asteroid belt, but is far larger—20 times as wide and 20–200 times as massive. Like the asteroid belt, it consists mainly of small bodies or remnants from when the Solar System formed. While many asteroids are composed primarily of rock and metal, most Kuiper belt objects are composed largely of frozen volatiles, such as methane, ammonia, and water. The Kuiper belt is home to most of the objects that astronomers generally accept as dwarf planets: Orcus, Pluto, Haumea, Quaoar, and Makemake. Some of the Solar System's moons, such as Neptune's Triton and Saturn's Phoebe, may have originated in the region.

    A trans-Neptunian object (TNO), also written transneptunian object, is any minor planet in the Solar System that orbits the Sun at a greater average distance than Neptune, which has an orbital semi-major axis of 30.1 astronomical units (AU).

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Pluto</span> Dwarf planet

    Pluto is a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, a ring of bodies beyond the orbit of Neptune. It is the ninth-largest and tenth-most-massive known object to directly orbit the Sun. It is the largest known trans-Neptunian object by volume, by a small margin, but is less massive than Eris. Like other Kuiper belt objects, Pluto is made primarily of ice and rock and is much smaller than the inner planets. Pluto has roughly one-sixth the mass of the Moon, and one-third its volume.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Charon (moon)</span> Largest natural satellite of Pluto

    Charon, or (134340) Pluto I, is the largest of the five known natural satellites of the dwarf planet Pluto. It has a mean radius of 606 km (377 mi). Charon is the sixth-largest known trans-Neptunian object after Pluto, Eris, Haumea, Makemake, and Gonggong. It was discovered in 1978 at the United States Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C., using photographic plates taken at the United States Naval Observatory Flagstaff Station (NOFS).

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Minor-planet moon</span> Natural satellite of a minor planet

    A minor-planet moon is an astronomical object that orbits a minor planet as its natural satellite. As of January 2022, there are 457 minor planets known or suspected to have moons. Discoveries of minor-planet moons are important because the determination of their orbits provides estimates on the mass and density of the primary, allowing insights into their physical properties that are generally not otherwise accessible.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">28978 Ixion</span> Plutino

    28978 Ixion (, provisional designation 2001 KX76) is a large trans-Neptunian object and a possible dwarf planet. It is located in the Kuiper belt, a region of icy objects orbiting beyond Neptune in the outer Solar System. Ixion is classified as a plutino, a dynamical class of objects in a 2:3 orbital resonance with Neptune. It was discovered in May 2001 by astronomers of the Deep Ecliptic Survey at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, and was announced in July 2001. The object is named after the Greek mythological figure Ixion, who was a king of the Lapiths.

    A binary system is a system of two astronomical bodies of the same kind that are comparable in size. Definitions vary, but typically require the center of mass to be located outside of either object.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Orcus (dwarf planet)</span> Trans-Neptunian dwarf planet

    Orcus is a dwarf planet located in the Kuiper belt, with one large moon, Vanth. It has an estimated diameter of 870 to 960 km, comparable to the Inner Solar System dwarf planet Ceres. The surface of Orcus is relatively bright with albedo reaching 23 percent, neutral in color, and rich in water ice. The ice is predominantly in crystalline form, which may be related to past cryovolcanic activity. Other compounds like methane or ammonia may also be present on its surface. Orcus was discovered by American astronomers Michael Brown, Chad Trujillo, and David Rabinowitz on 17 February 2004.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Haumea</span> Dwarf planet in the Solar System

    Haumea is a dwarf planet located beyond Neptune's orbit. It was discovered in 2004 by a team headed by Mike Brown of Caltech at the Palomar Observatory, and formally announced in 2005 by a team headed by José Luis Ortiz Moreno at the Sierra Nevada Observatory in Spain, who had discovered it that year in precovery images taken by the team in 2003. From that announcement, it received the provisional designation 2003 EL61.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">38628 Huya</span> Trans-Neptunian object

    38628 Huya ( hoo-YAH; provisional designation 2000 EB173) is a binary trans-Neptunian object located in the Kuiper belt, a region of icy objects orbiting beyond Neptune in the outer Solar System. Huya is classified as a plutino, a dynamical class of trans-Neptunian objects with orbits in a 3:2 orbital resonance with Neptune. It was discovered by the Quasar Equatorial Survey Team and was identified by Venezuelan astronomer Ignacio Ferrín in March 2000. It is named after Juyá, the mythological rain god of the Wayuu people native to South America.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Dysnomia (moon)</span> Moon of Eris

    Dysnomia (formally (136199) Eris I Dysnomia) is the only known moon of the dwarf planet Eris and is the second-largest known moon of a dwarf planet, after Pluto I Charon. It was discovered in September 2005 by Mike Brown and the Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics (LGSAO) team at the W. M. Keck Observatory. It carried the provisional designation of S/2005 (2003 UB313) 1 until it was officially named Dysnomia (from the Ancient Greek word Δυσνομία meaning anarchy/lawlessness) in September 2006, after the daughter of the Greek goddess Eris.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Dwarf planet</span> Small planetary-mass object

    A dwarf planet is a small planetary-mass object that is in direct orbit around the Sun, massive enough to be gravitationally rounded, but insufficient to achieve orbital dominance like the eight classical planets of the Solar System. The prototypical dwarf planet is Pluto, which for decades was regarded as a planet before the "dwarf" concept was adopted in 2006.

    <span class="nowrap">(307261) 2002 MS<sub>4</sub></span> Classical Kuiper belt object

    (307261) 2002 MS4 (provisional designation 2002 MS4) is a large trans-Neptunian object in the Kuiper belt, which is a region of icy planetesimals beyond Neptune. It was discovered on 18 June 2002 by Chad Trujillo and Michael Brown during their search for bright, Pluto-sized Kuiper belt objects at Palomar Observatory. To within measurement uncertainties, 2002 MS4, 2002 AW197, and 2013 FY27 have a diameter close to 800 km (500 mi), which makes them the largest unnamed objects in the Solar System. 2002 MS4 is large enough that astronomers consider it a possible dwarf planet.

    <span class="nowrap">(208996) 2003 AZ<sub>84</sub></span> Plutino

    (208996) 2003 AZ84 (provisional designation 2003 AZ84) is a trans-Neptunian object with a possible moon located in the outer regions of the Solar System. It is approximately 940 kilometers across its longest axis, as it has an elongated shape. It belongs to the plutinos – a group of minor planets named after its largest member Pluto – as it orbits in a 2:3 resonance with Neptune in the Kuiper belt. It is the third-largest known plutino, after Pluto and Orcus. It was discovered on 13 January 2003, by American astronomers Chad Trujillo and Michael Brown during the NEAT survey using the Samuel Oschin telescope at Palomar Observatory.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Moons of Haumea</span> Natural satellites orbiting dwarf planet Haumea

    The dwarf planet Haumea has two known moons, Hiʻiaka and Namaka, named after Hawaiian goddesses. These small moons were discovered in 2005, from observations of Haumea made at the large telescopes of the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Actaea (moon)</span> Moon of 120347 Salacia

    Actaea, officially (120347)Salacia I Actaea, is a natural satellite of the classical Kuiper belt object 120347 Salacia. Its diameter is estimated to be approximately 300 km (190 mi), which is approximately one-third the diameter of Salacia; thus, Salacia and Actaea are viewed by William Grundy et al. to be a binary system. Assuming that the following size estimates are correct, Actaea is about the sixth-biggest known moon of a trans-Neptunian object, after Charon (1212 km), Dysnomia (700 km), Vanth (443 km), Ilmarë (326 km), and Hiʻiaka (320 km), but possibly also Hiisi.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Ilmarë</span> Moon of 174567 Varda

    Ilmarë, or Varda I, full designation 174567 Varda I Ilmarë, is the single known natural satellite of the Kuiper belt object 174567 Varda. It was discovered by Keith Noll et al. in 2009, at a separation of about 0.12 arcsec, using discovery images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope on 26 April 2009, and reported in 2011. At approximately 326 km in diameter (about 45% that of its primary), it is the fourth or fifth-largest known moon of a trans-Neptunian object, after Pluto I Charon, Eris I Dysnomia, Orcus I Vanth and very possibly Haumea I Hiʻiaka. Assuming that Ilmarë has the same albedo and density as Varda, Ilmarë would constitute approximately 8.4% of the system's mass, approximately 2.2×1019 kg.

    <span class="nowrap">(523764) 2014 WC<sub>510</sub></span> Binary trans-Neptunian object

    (523764) 2014 WC510 (provisional designation 2014 WC510) is a binary trans-Neptunian object and plutino discovered on 8 September 2011 by the Pan-STARRS survey at the Haleakalā Observatory in Hawaii. It orbits in the Kuiper belt, a region of icy objects orbiting beyond Neptune in the outer Solar System. Astronomers discovered the binary nature of 2014 WC510 when its two components occulted a star on 1 December 2018. The components of the 2014 WC510 binary system, which have diameters of 180 km (110 mi) and 140 km (87 mi), orbit each other at a separation distance of roughly 2,600 km (1,600 mi).

    References

    1. 1 2 3 Green, Daniel W. E. (22 February 2007). "Satellites of 2003 AZ_84, (50000), (55637), and (90482)". IAU Circular. 8812. Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams: 1. Bibcode:2007IAUC.8812....1B. Archived from the original on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 4 July 2011.
    2. Suer, Terry-Ann. "Publications". sites.google.com. Retrieved 11 July 2023.
    3. 1 2 "M. P. C. 69496" (PDF). Minor Planet Circulars (69496). Minor Planet Center: 350. 30 March 2010. Retrieved 8 August 2010.
    4. 1 2 3 "JPL Small-Body Database Browser: 90482 Orcus (2004 DW)". Jet Propulsion Laboratory . Retrieved 14 July 2023.
    5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grundy, W. M.; Noll, K. S.; Roe, H. G.; Buie, M. W.; Porter, S. B.; Parker, A. H.; et al. (December 2019). "Mutual Orbit Orientations of Transneptunian Binaries" (PDF). Icarus. 334: 62–78. Bibcode:2019Icar..334...62G. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.03.035. S2CID   133585837.
    6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sickafoose, A. A.; Bosh, A. S.; Levine, S. E.; Zuluaga, C. A.; Genade, A.; Schindler, K.; et al. (February 2019). "A stellar occultation by Vanth, a satellite of (90482) Orcus". Icarus. 319: 657–668. arXiv: 1810.08977 . Bibcode:2019Icar..319..657S. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.10.016. S2CID   119099266.
    7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Brown, Michael E.; Butler, Bryan J. (October 2018). "Medium-sized satellites of large Kuiper belt objects". The Astronomical Journal. 156 (4): 6. arXiv: 1801.07221 . Bibcode:2018AJ....156..164B. doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad9f2 . S2CID   119343798. 164.
    8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Brown, Michael E.; Butler, Bryan (October 2023). "Masses and densities of dwarf planet satellites measured with ALMA". The Planetary Science Journal. 4 (10): 6. arXiv: 2307.04848 . Bibcode:2023PSJ.....4..193B. doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ace52a . 193.
    9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ortiz, J. L.; Cikota, A.; Cikota, S.; Hestroffer, D.; Thirouin, A.; Morales, N.; et al. (January 2011). "A mid-term astrometric and photometric study of Trans-Neptunian object (90482) Orcus". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 525: 12. arXiv: 1010.6187 . Bibcode:2011A&A...525A..31O. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015309 . S2CID   56051949. A31.
    10. 1 2 Rabinowitz, David L.; Owainati, Yasi (November 2014). The synchronous rotations of Eris/Dysnomia and Orcus/Vanth binary systems. 46th DPS Meeting. American Astronomical Society. Bibcode:2014DPS....4651007R. 510.07.
    11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Brown, M. E.; Ragozzine, D.; Stansberry, Bryan J.; Fraser, W. C. (June 2010). "The size, density, and formation of the Orcus-Vanth system in the Kuiper belt". The Astronomical Journal. 139 (6): 2700–2705. arXiv: 0910.4784 . Bibcode:2010AJ....139.2700B. doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2700 . S2CID   8864460.
    12. 1 2 3 4 Grundy, Will (21 March 2022). "Orcus and Vanth (90482 2004 DW)". www2.lowell.edu. Lowell Observatory. Retrieved 11 July 2023.
    13. 1 2 Brown, Michael (July 2005). "Icy planetoids of the outer solar system". Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (10545). Space Telescope Science Institute: 10545. Bibcode:2005hst..prop10545B. Cycle 14. Retrieved 11 February 2023.
    14. Brown, Michael (July 2006). "The largest Kuiper belt objects". Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (10860). Space Telescope Science Institute: 10860. Bibcode:2006hst..prop10860B. Cycle 15.
    15. Brown, Michael (July 2007). "Collisions in the Kuiper belt". Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (11169). Space Telescope Science Institute: 11169. Bibcode:2007hst..prop11169B. Cycle 16.
    16. 1 2 Brown, Michael E. (23 March 2009). "S/1 90482 (2005) needs your help". Mike Brown's Planets (blog). Archived from the original on 28 March 2009. Retrieved 25 March 2009.
    17. 1 2 3 4 5 Brown, Michael E. (6 April 2009). "Orcus Porcus". Mike Brown's Planets (blog). Archived from the original on 14 April 2009. Retrieved 6 April 2009.
    18. 1 2 Taaffe, Sonya. "Vanth – The Naming of Vanth". sonyataaffe.com. Archived from the original on 15 January 2024. Retrieved 15 January 2024.
    19. "Committee on Small Body Nomenclature: Names of Minor Planets". International Astronomical Union. 25 March 1999. Archived from the original on 29 January 2009. Retrieved 8 April 2009.
    20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Carry, B.; Hestroffer, D.; Demeo, F. E.; Thirouin, A.; Berthier, J.; Lacerda, P.; et al. (October 2011). "Integral-field spectroscopy of (90482) Orcus-Vanth". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 534: 9. arXiv: 1108.5963 . Bibcode:2011A&A...534A.115C. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117486 . S2CID   118524500. A115.
    21. "Occultation of TYC_5476-00882-1 by 90482 Orcus – 2014 March 01". Trans Tasman Occultation Alliance. Royal Astronomical Society of New Zealand. Retrieved 19 August 2023.
    22. Guhl, Konrad (September 2017). "Beyond Jupiter: (90482) Orcus" (PDF). Journal for Occultation Astronomy. 7 (3): 15–16. Retrieved 18 July 2023.
    23. 1 2 3 4 Arakawa, Sota; Hyodo, Ryuki; Genda, Hidenori (June 2019). "Early formation of moons around large trans-Neptunian objects via giant impacts". Nature Astronomy. 3 (9): 802–807. arXiv: 1906.10833 . Bibcode:2019NatAs...3..802A. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0797-9. S2CID   195366822.
    24. Delsanti, A.; Merlin, F.; Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.; Bauer, J.; Yang, B.; Meech, K. J. (September 2010). "Methane, ammonia, and their irradiation products at the surface of an intermediate-size KBO? A portrait of Plutino (90482) Orcus". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 520: 15. arXiv: 1006.4962 . Bibcode:2010A&A...520A..40D. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014296 . S2CID   118745903. A40.
    25. Lineweaver, Charles H.; Norman, Marc (28–30 September 2009). Short, W.; Cairns, I. (eds.). The Potato Radius: a Lower Minimum Size for Dwarf Planets (PDF). Proceedings of the 9th Australian Space Science Conference. National Space Society of Australia (published 2010). pp. 67–78. arXiv: 1004.1091 . Bibcode:2010arXiv1004.1091L. ISBN   9780977574032.
    26. Tancredi, G. (April 2010). "Physical and dynamical characteristics of icy "dwarf planets" (plutoids)". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 5 (S263): 173–185. Bibcode:2010IAUS..263..173T. doi: 10.1017/S1743921310001717 .