WOH G64

Last updated
WOH G64
WOH G64 VLTI.jpg
VLTI image of the dusty torus around the star.
Credit: ESO
Observation data
Epoch J2000.0        Equinox J2000.0
Constellation Dorado
Right ascension 04h 55m 10.5252s [1]
Declination −68° 20′ 29.998″ [1]
Apparent magnitude  (V)17.7 - 18.8 [2]
Characteristics
A
Evolutionary stage Yellow hypergiant [3]
Apparent magnitude  (K)6.849 [4]
Apparent magnitude  (R)15.69 [5]
Apparent magnitude  (G)15.0971 [1]
Apparent magnitude  (I)12.795 [6]
Apparent magnitude  (J)9.252 [4]
Apparent magnitude  (H)7.745 [4]
Variable type Slow irregular variable + symbiotic [3]
B
Spectral type B [3]
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv)285±2 [3]  km/s
Proper motion (μ)RA: 1.108 [1]   mas/yr
Dec.: −1.348 [1]   mas/yr
Parallax (π)−0.2280 ± 0.0625  mas [1]
Distance 160,000  ly
(50,000 [7]   pc)
Absolute magnitude  (MV)−6.00 [7]
Details
A
Mass 28 (initial mass) [3]   M☉
Radius ~800 [3]   R☉
Surface gravity (log g)0.0 [3]   cgs
Temperature 4,700 [3]   K
Age ≤5 [8]   Myr
Other designations
WOH G064, 2MASS  J04551048-6820298, IRAS  04553-6825, MSX LMC 1182
Database references
SIMBAD data

WOH G64 (IRAS 04553-6825) is a symbiotic binary in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), roughly 160,000 light-years from Earth. The main component of this system was once recognized as the best candidate for the largest known star when it was a red supergiant, [7] until it gradually became a yellow hypergiant with half of its original size. The secondary is a B-type star. This system also exhibits features of B(e) stars. [3]

Contents

WOH G64 is surrounded by an optically thick dust envelope of roughly a light year in diameter, containing 3 to 9 times the Sun's mass of expelled material that was created by the strong stellar wind. [9]

Observational history

WOH G64 was discovered in the 1970s by Bengt Westerlund, N. Olander and B. Hedin. Like NML Cygni, the "WOH" in the star's name comes from the last names of its three discoverers, but in this case refers to a whole catalogue of giant and supergiant stars in the LMC. [10] Westerlund also discovered another notable red supergiant star, Westerlund 1-26, found in the massive super star cluster Westerlund 1 in the constellation Ara. [11] In 1986, infrared observations showed that it was a highly luminous supergiant surrounded by gas and dust which absorbed around three quarters of its radiation. [12]

In 2007, observers using the Very Large Telescope (VLT) showed that WOH G64 is surrounded by a torus-shaped cloud. [9] In 2024, the dusty torus around WOH G64 was directly imaged by VLTI, showing the elongated and compact emission around the hypergiant. This is also the first interferometric imaging of a star outside the Milky Way. [13]

Variability

As a red supergiant, WOH G64 A varies regularly in brightness by over a magnitude at visual wavelengths with a primary period of around 800 days. [5] The star suffers from over six magnitudes of extinction at visual wavelengths, and the variation at infra-red wavelengths is much smaller. [7] It has been described as a carbon-rich Mira or long-period variable, which would necessarily be an asymptotic-giant-branch star (AGB star) rather than a supergiant. [6] Brightness variability has been confirmed by other researchers in some spectral bands, but it is unclear what the actual variable type is. No significant spectral variation has been found. [7] It is now classified as an irregular variable. [3]

Physical properties

Red supergiant stage

Artist's impression of the dusty torus and elliptical cocoon of dust surrounding WOH G64 (European Southern Observatory) Artist's impression of the dying star WOH G64 (eso2417c).jpg
Artist's impression of the dusty torus and elliptical cocoon of dust surrounding WOH G64 (European Southern Observatory)

The spectral type of WOH G64 A in its red supergiant stage was given as M5, [7] but it is usually found to have a much cooler spectral type of M7.5, highly unusual for a supergiant star. [8] [14] [12] Later observations showed that while the star used to be a M5–7.5 red supergiant, with a temperature of between 3200 K and 3400 K, it rapidly evolved, reaching a temperature of 4700 K and becoming a yellow hypergiant. [15] [7] [3]

WOH G64 was classified as an extremely luminous M class supergiant and was likely to be the largest star and the most luminous and coolest red supergiant in the LMC. [7] The combination of the star's temperature and luminosity placed it toward the upper right corner of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. The star's evolved state means that it can no longer hold on to its atmosphere due to low density, high radiation pressure, and the relatively opaque products of thermonuclear fusion.[ citation needed ] It had an average mass loss rate of 3.1 to 5.8×10−4 M☉ per year, among the highest known and unusually high even for a red supergiant. [16] [17]

Based on spectroscopic measurements assuming spherical shells, the star was originally calculated to have luminosity around between 490,000 and 600,000 L☉, suggesting initial masses at least 40 M☉ and consequently larger values for the radius between 2,575 and 3,000 R☉. [12] [14] [18] One such of these measurements from 2018 gives a luminosity of 432,000 L☉ and a higher effective temperature of 3,500  K , based on optical and infrared photometry and assuming spherically-symmetric radiation from the surrounding dust. This would suggest a radius of 1,788 R☉. [19] [a]

WOH G64 as a yellow hypergiant compared to the sun. WOH G64 compared to the Sun.png
WOH G64 as a yellow hypergiant compared to the sun.

The dust surrounding WOH G64 was revealed in 2007 to have a torus-like shape which was being viewed pole-on, meaning that the previous radius and luminosity estimates which assumed spherical dust shells were overestimated, as the radiation escape through the cavity (i.e. toward us). A much lower luminosity of 282,000+40,000
−30,000  L☉ was derived based on radiative transfer modelling of the surrounding torus, suggesting an initial mass of 25±5  M☉ and a radius around 1,730 R☉ for an effective temperature of 3,200  K . [9] In 2009, Emily Levesque calculated an effective temperature of 3,400±25 K by spectral fitting of the optical and near-UV SED. Adopting the Ohnaka luminosity with this new temperature gives a radius of 1,540±77  R☉ . [7] Those physical parameters are consistent with the largest galactic red supergiants and hypergiants found elsewhere such as VY Canis Majoris and with theoretical models of the coolest, most luminous and largest possible cool supergiants (e.g. the Hayashi limit or the Humphreys–Davidson limit). [7] [9] [14]

WOH G64 was discovered to be a prominent source of OH, H
2O , and SiO masers emission, which is typical of an OH/IR supergiant star. [7] It shows an unusual spectrum of nebular emission; the hot gas is rich in nitrogen and has a radial velocity considerably more positive than that of the star. [7] The stellar atmosphere is producing a strong silicate absorption band in mid-infrared wavelengths, accompanied a line emission due to highly excited carbon monoxide. [20]

Yellow hypergiant stage

WOH G64 has shrunk in size since 2014, and has become a smaller yellow hypergiant. It is now about half of its size in the red supergiant phase, at 800 R☉. The variability of WOH G64 also changed, from semiregular to irregular. Its change would only be recognized in a 2024 preprint, which also discovered WOH G64 is a symbiotic star with a smaller B-type companion. [3]

Companion

Since 2016, the spectrum of WOH G64 exhibits features of both B[e] stars and yellow stars, which is interpreted as the spectral signature of a massive symbiotic binary consisting of a yellow hypergiant losing material to an accreting B-type star companion. [3] The persistent presence of surrounding hot dust, elongated appearance of the hypergiant in interferometric imaging, and the lack of a violent outburst during WOH G64's transition out of the red supergiant stage further supports the binary nature of WOH G64. [3] [13] The interacting binary system HR 5171 is considered an analog to WOH G64, as it also contains a yellow hypergiant with a B-type star companion. [3] The presence of a hot stellar companion of WOH G64 was first suspected by Levesque et al. in 2009, who proposed that a late O-type main-sequence star companion could be ionizing the nebula surrounding WOH G64 in order to explain the 50 km/s shift between the nebular emission lines and WOH G64's spectral features. [3] [7]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Applying the Stefan-Boltzmann Law with a nominal solar effective temperature of 5,772  K:

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Brown, A. G. A.; et al. (Gaia collaboration) (August 2018). "Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the contents and survey properties". Astronomy & Astrophysics . 616. A1. arXiv: 1804.09365 . Bibcode: 2018A&A...616A...1G . doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 . Gaia DR2 record for this source at VizieR.
  2. ↑ Bhardwaj, Anupam; Kanbur, Shashi; He, Shiyuan; Rejkuba, Marina; Matsunaga, Noriyuki; De Grijs, Richard; Sharma, Kaushal; Singh, Harinder P.; Baug, Tapas; Ngeow, Chow-Choong; Ou, Jia-Yu (2019). "Multiwavelength Period-Luminosity and Period-Luminosity-Color Relations at Maximum Light for Mira Variables in the Magellanic Clouds". The Astrophysical Journal. 884 (1): 20. arXiv: 1908.01795 . Bibcode:2019ApJ...884...20B. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab38c2 . S2CID   199452754.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Munoz-Sanchez, G.; et al. (28 November 2024). "The dramatic transition of the extreme Red Supergiant WOH G64 to a Yellow Hypergiant". arXiv: 2411.19329 [astro-ph.SR].
  4. 1 2 3 Cutri, Roc M.; Skrutskie, Michael F.; Van Dyk, Schuyler D.; Beichman, Charles A.; Carpenter, John M.; Chester, Thomas; Cambresy, Laurent; Evans, Tracey E.; Fowler, John W.; Gizis, John E.; Howard, Elizabeth V.; Huchra, John P.; Jarrett, Thomas H.; Kopan, Eugene L.; Kirkpatrick, J. Davy; Light, Robert M.; Marsh, Kenneth A.; McCallon, Howard L.; Schneider, Stephen E.; Stiening, Rae; Sykes, Matthew J.; Weinberg, Martin D.; Wheaton, William A.; Wheelock, Sherry L.; Zacarias, N. (2003). "VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003)". CDS/ADC Collection of Electronic Catalogues. 2246: II/246. Bibcode:2003yCat.2246....0C.
  5. 1 2 Fraser, Oliver J.; Hawley, Suzanne L.; Cook, Kem H. (2008). "The Properties of Long-Period Variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud from MACHO". The Astronomical Journal. 136 (3): 1242–1258. arXiv: 0808.1737 . Bibcode:2008AJ....136.1242F. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/1242. S2CID   2754884.
  6. 1 2 Soszyñski, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymañski, M. K.; Kubiak, M.; Pietrzyñski, G.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Szewczyk, O.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R. (2009). "The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. IV. Long-Period Variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Acta Astronomica. 59 (3): 239. arXiv: 0910.1354 . Bibcode:2009AcA....59..239S.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Levesque, E. M.; Massey, P.; Plez, B.; Olsen, K. A. G. (2009). "The Physical Properties of the Red Supergiant WOH G64: The Largest Star Known?". The Astronomical Journal. 137 (6): 4744. arXiv: 0903.2260 . Bibcode:2009AJ....137.4744L. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/4744. S2CID   18074349.
  8. 1 2 Davies, Ben; Crowther, Paul A.; Beasor, Emma R. (2018). "The luminosities of cool supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds, and the Humphreys–Davidson limit revisited". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 478 (3): 3138–3148. arXiv: 1804.06417 . Bibcode:2018MNRAS.478.3138D. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1302 . S2CID   59459492.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Ohnaka, K.; Driebe, T.; Hofmann, K. H.; Weigelt, G.; Wittkowski, M. (July 2008). "Resolving the dusty torus and the mystery surrounding LMC red supergiant WOH G64". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 4: 454–458. Bibcode:2009IAUS..256..454O. doi: 10.1017/S1743921308028858 .
  10. ↑ Westerlund, B. E.; Olander, N.; Hedin, B. (1981). "Supergiant and giant M type stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series . 43: 267–295. Bibcode:1981A&AS...43..267W. ISSN   0365-0138.
  11. ↑ Westerlund, B. E. (1987). "Photometry and spectroscopy of stars in the region of a highly reddened cluster in ARA". Astronomy & Astrophysics . Supplement. 70 (3): 311–324. Bibcode:1987A&AS...70..311W. ISSN   0365-0138.
  12. 1 2 3 Elias, J. H.; Frogel, J. A.; Schwering, P. B. W. (March 1986). "Two supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud with thick dust shells". The Astrophysical Journal . 302: 675. Bibcode:1986ApJ...302..675E. doi:10.1086/164028. hdl: 1887/6514 . ISSN   0004-637X.
  13. 1 2 Ohnaka, K.; Hofmann, K.-H.; Weigelt, G.; van Loon, J. Th.; Schertl, D.; Goldman, S. R. (November 2024). "Imaging the innermost circumstellar environment of the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 691: L15. arXiv: 2412.01921 . Bibcode:2024A&A...691L..15O. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451820 . ISSN   0004-6361.
  14. 1 2 3 Van Loon, J. Th.; Cioni, M.-R. L.; Zijlstra, A. A.; Loup, C. (2005). "An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch stars". Astronomy and Astrophysics . 438 (1): 273–289. arXiv: astro-ph/0504379 . Bibcode:2005A&A...438..273V. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042555. S2CID   16724272.
  15. ↑ Ohnaka, K.; Driebe, T.; Hofmann, K. H.; Weigelt, G.; Wittkowski, M. (2009). "Resolving the dusty torus and the mystery surrounding LMC red supergiant WOH G64". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 4: 454–458. Bibcode:2009IAUS..256..454O. doi: 10.1017/S1743921308028858 .
  16. ↑ Goldman, Steven R.; van Loon, Jacco Th.; Zijlstra, Albert A.; et al. (February 2017). "The wind speeds, dust content, and mass-loss rates of evolved AGB and RSG stars at varying metallicity". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 465 (1): 403–433. arXiv: 1610.05761 . Bibcode:2017MNRAS.465..403G. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2708 . ISSN   0035-8711. S2CID   11352637.
  17. ↑ de Wit, S.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Tramper, F.; Yang, M.; Maravelias, G.; Boutsia, K.; Britavskiy, N.; Zapartas, E. (2023). "Properties of luminous red supergiant stars in the Magellanic Clouds". Astronomy and Astrophysics . 669: 17. arXiv: 2209.11239 . Bibcode:2023A&A...669A..86D. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243394. S2CID   252519285.
  18. ↑ Monnier, J. D; Millan-Gabet, R; Tuthill, P. G; Traub, W. A; Carleton, N. P; Coudé Du Foresto, V; Danchi, W. C; Lacasse, M. G; Morel, S; Perrin, G; Porro, I. L; Schloerb, F. P; Townes, C. H (2004). "High-Resolution Imaging of Dust Shells by Using Keck Aperture Masking and the IOTA Interferometer". The Astrophysical Journal. 605 (1): 436–461. arXiv: astro-ph/0401363 . Bibcode:2004ApJ...605..436M. doi:10.1086/382218. S2CID   7851916.
  19. ↑ Groenewegen, Martin A. T.; Sloan, Greg C. (2018). "Luminosities and mass-loss rates of Local Group AGB stars and Red Supergiants". Astronomy & Astrophysics . 609: A114. arXiv: 1711.07803 . Bibcode:2018A&A...609A.114G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731089. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   59327105.
  20. ↑ Matsuura, Mikako; Sargent, B.; Swinyard, Bruce; Yates, Jeremy; Royer, P.; Barlow, M. J.; Boyer, Martha; Decin, L.; Khouri, Theo; Meixner, Margaret; van Loon, Jacco Th.; Woods, Paul M. (1 November 2016). "The mass-loss rates of red supergiants at low metallicity: detection of rotational CO emission from two red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 462 (3): 2995–3005. arXiv: 1608.01729 . doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1853 . ISSN   0035-8711.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.