Proper motion

Last updated
Relation between proper motion and velocity components of an object.
A year ago the object was d units of distance from the Sun, and its light moved in a year by angle m radian/s. If there has been no distortion by gravitational lensing or otherwise then m =
v
t
d
{\displaystyle {\frac {v_{t}}{d}}}
where
v
t
{\displaystyle v_{t}}
is the distance (usually expressed as annual velocity) transverse (tangential or perpendicular) to line of sight from the Sun. The angle is shaded light blue from the Sun to the object's start point and its year later position as if it had no radial velocity.
In this diagram the radial velocity happens to be one of the Sun and object parting, so is positive. Proper motion.svg
Relation between proper motion and velocity components of an object.
A year ago the object was d units of distance from the Sun, and its light moved in a year by angle μ radian/s. If there has been no distortion by gravitational lensing or otherwise then μ = where is the distance (usually expressed as annual velocity) transverse (tangential or perpendicular) to line of sight from the Sun. The angle is shaded light blue from the Sun to the object's start point and its year later position as if it had no radial velocity.
In this diagram the radial velocity happens to be one of the Sun and object parting, so is positive.

Proper motion is the astrometric measure of the observed changes in the apparent places of stars or other celestial objects in the sky, as seen from the center of mass of the Solar System, compared to the abstract background of the more distant stars. [1]

Contents

The components for proper motion in the equatorial coordinate system (of a given epoch, often J2000.0) are given in the direction of right ascension (μα) and of declination (μδ). Their combined value is computed as the total proper motion (μ). [2] [3] It has dimensions of angle per time, typically arcseconds per year or milliarcseconds per year.

Knowledge of the proper motion, distance, and radial velocity allows calculations of an object's motion from the Solar System's frame of reference and its motion from the galactic frame of reference that is motion in respect to the Sun, and by coordinate transformation, that in respect to the Milky Way. [4]

Introduction

The celestial north and south poles are above/below CNP, CSP; the origin of all 24 hours of Right Ascension (the measure of absolute celestial east-west position), the March equinox (center of the sun's position then) at the J2000 epoch, is vector V.
In red the diagram adds the components of proper motion across the celestial sphere.
An ideal time to measure exactly such a small annual shift is at culmination. The culmination of the star is daily reached when the observer (and Earth) passes as shown by the blue arrows "beneath" the star.
The positive axes of the two components of its usually annually measured or published shift in proper motion are the exaggerated red arrows, note: the right arrows point to the east horizon. One red annotation is subtly shorter as the cosine of a star resting at 0deg declination is 1, so such a star's east or west shift would not need to be multiplied by the cosine of its declination.
The proper motion vector is m, a = right ascension, d = declination, th = position angle. Components of proper motion.svg
The celestial north and south poles are above/below CNP, CSP; the origin of all 24 hours of Right Ascension (the measure of absolute celestial east–west position), the March equinox (center of the sun's position then) at the J2000 epoch, is vector V.
In red the diagram adds the components of proper motion across the celestial sphere.
An ideal time to measure exactly such a small annual shift is at culmination. The culmination of the star is daily reached when the observer (and Earth) passes as shown by the blue arrows "beneath" the star.
The positive axes of the two components of its usually annually measured or published shift in proper motion are the exaggerated red arrows, note: the right arrows point to the east horizon. One red annotation is subtly shorter as the cosine of a star resting at 0° declination is 1, so such a star's east or west shift would not need to be multiplied by the cosine of its declination.
The proper motion vector is μ, α = right ascension, δ = declination, θ = position angle.

Over the course of centuries, stars appear to maintain nearly fixed positions with respect to each other, so that they form the same constellations over historical time. As examples, both Ursa Major in the northern sky and Crux in the southern sky, look nearly the same now as they did hundreds of years ago. However, precise long-term observations show that such constellations change shape, albeit very slowly, and that each star has an independent motion.

This motion is caused by the movement of the stars relative to the Sun and Solar System. The Sun travels in a nearly circular orbit (the solar circle ) about the center of the galaxy at a speed of about 220 km/s at a radius of 8,000 parsecs (26,000 ly) from Sagittarius A* [5] [6] which can be taken as the rate of rotation of the Milky Way itself at this radius. [7] [8]

Any proper motion is a two-dimensional vector (as it excludes the component as to the direction of the line of sight) and it bears two quantities or characteristics: its position angle and its magnitude. The first is the direction of the proper motion on the celestial sphere (with 0 degrees meaning the motion is north, 90 degrees meaning the motion is east, (left on most sky maps and space telescope images) and so on), and the second is its magnitude, typically expressed in arcseconds per year (symbols: arcsec/yr, as/yr, ″/yr, ″ yr1) or milliarcseconds per year (symbols: mas/yr, mas yr1).

Proper motion may alternatively be defined by the angular changes per year in the star's right ascension (μα) and declination (μδ) with respect to a constant epoch.

The components of proper motion by convention are arrived at as follows. Suppose an object moves from coordinates (α1, δ1) to coordinates (α2, δ2) in a time Δt. The proper motions are given by: [9]

The magnitude of the proper motion μ is given by the Pythagorean theorem: [10]

technically abbreviated:

where δ is the declination. The factor in cos2δ accounts for the widening of the lines (hours) of right ascension away from the poles, cosδ, being zero for a hypothetical object fixed at a celestial pole in declination. Thus, a co-efficient is given to negate the misleadingly greater east or west velocity (angular change in α) in hours of Right Ascension the further it is towards the imaginary infinite poles, above and below the earth's axis of rotation, in the sky. The change μα, which must be multiplied by cosδ to become a component of the proper motion, is sometimes called the "proper motion in right ascension", and μδ the "proper motion in declination". [11]

If the proper motion in right ascension has been converted by cosδ, the result is designated μα*. For example, the proper motion results in right ascension in the Hipparcos Catalogue (HIP) have already been converted. [12] Hence, the individual proper motions in right ascension and declination are made equivalent for straightforward calculations of various other stellar motions.

The position angle θ is related to these components by: [2] [13]

Motions in equatorial coordinates can be converted to motions in galactic coordinates. [14]

Examples

For most stars seen in the sky, the observed proper motions are small and unremarkable. Such stars are often either faint or are significantly distant, have changes of below 0.01″ per year, and do not appear to move appreciably over many millennia. A few do have significant motions, and are usually called high-proper motion stars. Motions can also be in almost seemingly random directions. Two or more stars, double stars or open star clusters, which are moving in similar directions, exhibit so-called shared or common proper motion (or cpm.), suggesting they may be gravitationally attached or share similar motion in space.

Barnard's Star, showing position every 5 years 1985-2005. Barnard2005.gif
Barnard's Star, showing position every 5 years 1985–2005.

Barnard's Star has the largest proper motion of all stars, moving at 10.3″ yr1. Large proper motion usually strongly indicates an object is close to the Sun. This is so for Barnard's Star, about 6 light-years away. After the Sun and the Alpha Centauri system, it is the nearest known star. Being a red dwarf with an apparent magnitude of 9.54, it is too faint to see without a telescope or powerful binoculars. Of the stars visible to the naked eye (conservatively limiting unaided visual magnitude to 6.0), 61 Cygni A (magnitude V=5.20) has the highest proper motion at 5.281″ yr1, discounting Groombridge 1830 (magnitude V=6.42), proper motion: 7.058″ yr1. [15]

A proper motion of 1 arcsec per year 1 light-year away corresponds to a relative transverse speed of 1.45 km/s. Barnard's Star's transverse speed is 90 km/s and its radial velocity is 111 km/s (perpendicular (at a right, 90° angle), which gives a true or "space" motion of 142 km/s. True or absolute motion is more difficult to measure than the proper motion, because the true transverse velocity involves the product of the proper motion times the distance. As shown by this formula, true velocity measurements depend on distance measurements, which are difficult in general.

In 1992 Rho Aquilae became the first star to have its Bayer designation invalidated by moving to a neighbouring constellation it is now in Delphinus. [16]

Usefulness in astronomy

Stars with large proper motions tend to be nearby; most stars are far enough away that their proper motions are very small, on the order of a few thousandths of an arcsecond per year. It is possible to construct nearly complete samples of high proper motion stars by comparing photographic sky survey images taken many years apart. The Palomar Sky Survey is one source of such images. In the past, searches for high proper motion objects were undertaken using blink comparators to examine the images by eye. More modern techniques such as image differencing can scan digitized images, or comparisons to star catalogs obtained by satellites. [17] As any selection biases of these surveys are well understood and quantifiable, studies have confirmed more and inferred approximate quantities of unseen stars revealing and confirming more by studying them further, regardless of brightness, for instance. Studies of this kind show most of the nearest stars are intrinsically faint and angularly small, such as red dwarfs.

Measurement of the proper motions of a large sample of stars in a distant stellar system, like a globular cluster, can be used to compute the cluster's total mass via the Leonard-Merritt mass estimator. Coupled with measurements of the stars' radial velocities, proper motions can be used to compute the distance to the cluster.

Stellar proper motions have been used to infer the presence of a super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. [18] This black hole is suspected to be Sgr A*, with a mass of 4.2 × 106  M (solar masses).

Proper motions of the galaxies in the Local Group are discussed in detail in Röser. [19] In 2005, the first measurement was made of the proper motion of the Triangulum Galaxy M33, the third largest and only ordinary spiral galaxy in the Local Group, located 0.860 ± 0.028 Mpc beyond the Milky Way. [20] The motion of the Andromeda Galaxy was measured in 2012, and an Andromeda–Milky Way collision is predicted in about 4.5 billion years. [21] Proper motion of the NGC 4258 (M106) galaxy in the M106 group of galaxies was used in 1999 to find an accurate distance to this object. [22] Measurements were made of the radial motion of objects in that galaxy moving directly toward and away from Earth, and assuming this same motion to apply to objects with only a proper motion, the observed proper motion predicts a distance to the galaxy of 7.2±0.5 Mpc. [23]

History

Proper motion was suspected by early astronomers (according to Macrobius, c. AD 400) but a proof was not provided until 1718 by Edmund Halley, who noticed that Sirius, Arcturus and Aldebaran were over half a degree away from the positions charted by the ancient Greek astronomer Hipparchus roughly 1850 years earlier. [24] [25]

The lesser meaning of "proper" used is arguably dated English (but neither historic, nor obsolete when used as a postpositive, as in "the city proper") meaning "belonging to" or "own". "Improper motion" would refer to perceived motion that is nothing to do with an object's inherent course, such as due to Earth's axial precession, and minor deviations, nutations well within the 26,000-year cycle.

Stars with high proper motion

The following are the stars with highest proper motion from the Hipparcos catalog. [26] It does not include stars such as Teegarden's Star, which are too faint for that catalog. A more complete list of stellar objects can be made by doing a criterion query at the SIMBAD astronomical database.

Proper motion of 61 Cygni in one year intervals. 61 Cygni Proper Motion.gif
Proper motion of 61 Cygni in one year intervals.
Highest proper motion stars [27]
#StarProper motionRadial
velocity
(km/s)
Parallax
(arc seconds)
Distance in parsecs
μα · cos δ
(mas/yr)
μδ
(mas/yr)
1 Barnard's Star −798.5810328.12−110.510.548311.82
2 Kapteyn's Star 6505.08−5730.84+245.190.255663.91
3 Groombridge 1830 4003.98−5813.62−98.350.109999.09
4 Lacaille 9352 6768.201327.52+8.810.305263.28
5 Gliese 1 (CD −37 15492) (GJ 1)5634.68−2337.71+25.380.230424.34
6 HIP 67593 2118.73 [28] 5397.57 [28] −4.40.187765.33
7 61 Cygni A & B4133.053201.78−65.740.2863.50
8 Lalande 21185 −580.27−4765.85−84.690.392642.55
9 Epsilon Indi 3960.93−2539.23−40.000.276063.62

The figure for HIP 67593 is almost certainly an error, probably because the star has a relatively nearby brighter visual binary companion; the movement between the DSS2 and SDSS9 images is less than it. Gaia measured a much smaller proper motion for its Data Release 2, yet a 15-fold parallax between it and its likely common-proper-motion companion HIP 67594. Reconciling its distance and motion will have to wait for Data Release 3 expected to analyse well very high proper motion objects.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aberration (astronomy)</span> Phenomenon wherein objects appear to move about their true positions in the sky

In astronomy, aberration is a phenomenon where celestial objects exhibit an apparent motion about their true positions based on the velocity of the observer: It causes objects to appear to be displaced towards the observer's direction of motion. The change in angle is of the order of v/c where c is the speed of light and v the velocity of the observer. In the case of "stellar" or "annual" aberration, the apparent position of a star to an observer on Earth varies periodically over the course of a year as the Earth's velocity changes as it revolves around the Sun, by a maximum angle of approximately 20 arcseconds in right ascension or declination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caelum</span> Constellation in the southern celestial hemisphere

Caelum is a faint constellation in the southern sky, introduced in the 1750s by Nicolas Louis de Lacaille and counted among the 88 modern constellations. Its name means "chisel" in Latin, and it was formerly known as Caelum Sculptorium ; it is a rare word, unrelated to the far more common Latin caelum, meaning "sky", "heaven", or "atmosphere". It is the eighth-smallest constellation, and subtends a solid angle of around 0.038 steradians, just less than that of Corona Australis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Astronomical coordinate systems</span> System for specifying positions of celestial objects

In astronomy, coordinate systems are used for specifying positions of celestial objects relative to a given reference frame, based on physical reference points available to a situated observer. Coordinate systems in astronomy can specify an object's position in three-dimensional space or plot merely its direction on a celestial sphere, if the object's distance is unknown or trivial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equatorial coordinate system</span> Celestial coordinate system used to specify the positions of celestial objects

The equatorial coordinate system is a celestial coordinate system widely used to specify the positions of celestial objects. It may be implemented in spherical or rectangular coordinates, both defined by an origin at the centre of Earth, a fundamental plane consisting of the projection of Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere, a primary direction towards the vernal equinox, and a right-handed convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galactic coordinate system</span> Celestial coordinate system in spherical coordinates, with the Sun as its center

The galactic coordinate system is a celestial coordinate system in spherical coordinates, with the Sun as its center, the primary direction aligned with the approximate center of the Milky Way Galaxy, and the fundamental plane parallel to an approximation of the galactic plane but offset to its north. It uses the right-handed convention, meaning that coordinates are positive toward the north and toward the east in the fundamental plane.

<i>Hipparcos</i> European Space Agency scientific satellite

Hipparcos was a scientific satellite of the European Space Agency (ESA), launched in 1989 and operated until 1993. It was the first space experiment devoted to precision astrometry, the accurate measurement of the positions of celestial objects on the sky. This permitted the first high-precision measurements of the intrinsic brightnesses, proper motions, and parallaxes of stars, enabling better calculations of their distance and tangential velocity. When combined with radial velocity measurements from spectroscopy, astrophysicists were able to finally measure all six quantities needed to determine the motion of stars. The resulting Hipparcos Catalogue, a high-precision catalogue of more than 118,200 stars, was published in 1997. The lower-precision Tycho Catalogue of more than a million stars was published at the same time, while the enhanced Tycho-2 Catalogue of 2.5 million stars was published in 2000. Hipparcos' follow-up mission, Gaia, was launched in 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ursa Major moving group</span> USAR Major Moving Group- Stars

The Ursa Major Moving Group, also known as Collinder 285 and the Ursa Major association, is the closest stellar moving group – a set of stars with common velocities in space and thought to have a common origin in space and time. In the case of the Ursa Major group, all the stars formed about 300 million years ago. Its core is located roughly 80 light years away and part of the Local Bubble. It is rich in bright stars including most of the stars of the Big Dipper.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alpha Cassiopeiae</span> Star in the constellation Cassiopeia

Alpha Cassiopeiae or α Cassiopeiae, also named Schedar, is a second-magnitude star in the northern constellation of Cassiopeia. Though listed as the "alpha star" by Johann Bayer, α Cas's visual brightness closely matches the 'beta' (β) star in the constellation and it may appear marginally brighter or dimmer, depending on which passband is used. However, recent calculations from NASA's WISE telescope confirm that α Cas is the brightest in Cassiopeia, with an apparent magnitude of 2.240. Its absolute magnitude is 18 times greater than β Cas, and it is located over four times farther away from the Sun.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta Scuti</span> Star in the constellation Scutum

Delta Scuti, Latinized from δ Scuti, is a variable star in the southern constellation Scutum. With an apparent visual magnitude that fluctuates around 4.72, it is the fifth-brightest star in this small and otherwise undistinguished constellation. Analysis of the parallax measurements place this star at a distance of about 199 light-years from Earth. It is drifting closer with a radial velocity of −45 km/s.

A theoretical motivation for general relativity, including the motivation for the geodesic equation and the Einstein field equation, can be obtained from special relativity by examining the dynamics of particles in circular orbits about the Earth. A key advantage in examining circular orbits is that it is possible to know the solution of the Einstein Field Equation a priori. This provides a means to inform and verify the formalism.

Angular distance or angular separation is the measure of the angle between the orientation of two straight lines, rays, or vectors in three-dimensional space, or the central angle subtended by the radii through two points on a sphere. When the rays are lines of sight from an observer to two points in space, it is known as the apparent distance or apparent separation.

The Oort constants and are empirically derived parameters that characterize the local rotational properties of our galaxy, the Milky Way, in the following manner:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta Ceti</span> Star in the constellation Cetus

Delta Ceti, Latinized from δ Ceti, is a single, blue-white hued star in the equatorial constellation of Cetus. The star's apparent visual magnitude of +4.06 means it is near to the cusp of the faintest third of the stars that are visible the ideally-placed naked eye. It is 0.3238° north of the celestial equator compared to the celestial north pole's 90°. The star is positioned about 0.74° WNW of the spiral galaxy M77, but which at apparent magnitude 9.6 needs magnification to be made out and has an apparent size of only 0.1° by 0.12°.

Polar alignment is the act of aligning the rotational axis of a telescope's equatorial mount or a sundial's gnomon with a celestial pole to parallel Earth's axis.

In astronomy, rotational Brownian motion is the random walk in orientation of a binary star's orbital plane, induced by gravitational perturbations from passing stars.

Orbit modeling is the process of creating mathematical models to simulate motion of a massive body as it moves in orbit around another massive body due to gravity. Other forces such as gravitational attraction from tertiary bodies, air resistance, solar pressure, or thrust from a propulsion system are typically modeled as secondary effects. Directly modeling an orbit can push the limits of machine precision due to the need to model small perturbations to very large orbits. Because of this, perturbation methods are often used to model the orbit in order to achieve better accuracy.

Astronomical nutation is a phenomenon which causes the orientation of the axis of rotation of a spinning astronomical object to vary over time. It is caused by the gravitational forces of other nearby bodies acting upon the spinning object. Although they are caused by the same effect operating over different timescales, astronomers usually make a distinction between precession, which is a steady long-term change in the axis of rotation, and nutation, which is the combined effect of similar shorter-term variations.

2MASS J04070752+1546457 is a rapidly-rotating brown dwarf of spectral class L3.5, located in the constellation Taurus about 119 light-years from Earth. With a photometrically measured rotation period of 1.23 hours, it is one of the fastest-rotating known brown dwarfs announced by a team of astronomers led by Megan E. Tannock in March 2021. With a rotational velocity of over 80 km/s (50 mi/s), it is approaching the predicted rotational speed limit beyond which it would break apart due to centripetal forces. As a consequence of its rapid rotation, the brown dwarf is slightly flattened at its poles to a similar degree as Saturn, the most oblate planet in the Solar System. Its rapid rotation may enable strong auroral radio emissions via particle interactions in its magnetic field, as observed in other known rapidly-rotating brown dwarfs.

2MASS J12195156+3128497 is a rapidly-rotating brown dwarf of spectral class L8, located in the constellation Coma Berenices about 66 light-years from Earth. With a photometrically measured rotation period of 1.14 hours, it is one of the fastest-rotating known brown dwarfs announced by a team of astronomers led by Megan E. Tannock in March 2021. With a rotational velocity of about 80 km/s (50 mi/s), it is approaching the predicted rotational speed limit beyond which it would break apart due to centripetal forces. As a consequence of its rapid rotation, the brown dwarf is slightly flattened at its poles to a similar degree as Saturn, the most oblate planet in the Solar System. Its rapid rotation may enable strong auroral radio emissions via particle interactions in its magnetic field, as observed in other known rapidly-rotating brown dwarfs.

References

  1. Theo Koupelis; Karl F. Kuhn (2007). In Quest of the Universe . Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p.  369. ISBN   978-0-7637-4387-1.
  2. 1 2 D. Scott Birney; Guillermo Gonzalez; David Oesper (2007). Observational Astronomy. p. 75. ISBN   978-0-521-85370-5.
  3. Simon F. Green; Mark H. Jones (2004). An Introduction to the Sun and Stars. Cambridge University Press. p. 87. ISBN   978-0-521-54622-5.
  4. D. Scott Birney; Guillermo Gonzalez; David Oesper (2007). Observational Astronomy. Cambridge University Press. p. 73. ISBN   978-0-521-85370-5.
  5. Horace A. Smith (2004). RR Lyrae Stars. Cambridge University Press. p. 79. ISBN   978-0-521-54817-5.
  6. M Reid; A Brunthaler; Xu Ye; et al. (2008). "Mapping the Milky Way and the Local Group". In F Combes; Keiichi Wada (eds.). Mapping the Galaxy and Nearby Galaxies. Springer. ISBN   978-0-387-72767-7.
  7. Y Sofu & V Rubin (2001). "Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 39: 137–174. arXiv: astro-ph/0010594 . Bibcode:2001ARA&A..39..137S. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137. S2CID   11338838.
  8. Abraham Loeb; Mark J. Reid; Andreas Brunthaler; Heino Falcke (2005). "Constraints on the proper motion of the Andromeda galaxy based on the survival of its satellite M33" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 633 (2): 894–898. arXiv: astro-ph/0506609 . Bibcode:2005ApJ...633..894L. doi:10.1086/491644. S2CID   17099715.
  9. William Marshall Smart; Robin Michael Green (1977). Textbook on Spherical Astronomy. Cambridge University Press. p. 252. ISBN   978-0-521-29180-4.
  10. Charles Leander Doolittle (1890). A Treatise on Practical Astronomy, as Applied to Geodesy and Navigation. Wiley. p.  583.
  11. Simon Newcomb (1904). The Stars: A study of the Universe. Putnam. pp.  287–288.
  12. Matra Marconi Space, Alenia Spazio (September 15, 2003). "The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues : Astrometric and Photometric Star Catalogues derived from the ESA Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission" (PDF). ESA. p. 25. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 3, 2016. Retrieved 2015-04-08.
  13. See Majewski, Steven R. (2006). "Stellar motions: parallax, proper motion, radial velocity and space velocity". University of Virginia. Archived from the original on 2013-07-07. Retrieved 2008-12-31.
  14. See lecture notes by Steven Majewski.
  15. Hipparcos: Catalogues: The Millennium Star Atlas: The Top 20 High Proper Motion, European Space Agency, retrieved 2019-06-27
  16. Lemay, Damien (1992). "Book-Review – Sky Catalogue 2000.0 – V.1 – Stars to Magnitude 8.0 ED.2". Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. 86: 221. Bibcode:1992JRASC..86..221L.
  17. Akhmetov, V. S.; Fedorov, P. N.; Velichko, A. B.; Shulga, V. M. (2017-07-21). "The PMA Catalogue: 420 million positions and absolute proper motions". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 469 (1): 763–773. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx812. ISSN   0035-8711.
  18. Ghez, Andrea M.; et al. (2003). "The First Measurement of Spectral Lines in a Short-Period Star Bound to the Galaxy's Central Black Hole: A Paradox of Youth". Astrophysical Journal. 586 (2): L127–L131. arXiv: astro-ph/0302299 . Bibcode:2003ApJ...586L.127G. doi:10.1086/374804. S2CID   11388341.
  19. Andreas Brunthaler (2005). "M33 – Distance and Motion". In Siegfried Röser (ed.). Reviews in Modern Astronomy: From Cosmological Structures to the Milky Way. Wiley. pp. 179–194. ISBN   978-3-527-40608-1.
  20. A. Brunthaler; M.J. Reid; H. Falcke; L.J. Greenhill; C. Henkel (2005). "The Geometric Distance and Proper Motion of the Triangulum Galaxy (M33)". Science. 307 (5714): 1440–1443. arXiv: astro-ph/0503058 . Bibcode:2005Sci...307.1440B. doi:10.1126/science.1108342. PMID   15746420. S2CID   28172780.
  21. Gough, Evan. "Universe Today". The Astrophysical Journal. Retrieved 12 February 2019.
  22. Steven Weinberg (2008). Cosmology. Oxford University Press. p. 17. ISBN   978-0-19-852682-7.
  23. J. R. Herrnstein; et al. (1999). "A geometric distance to the galaxy NGC4258 from orbital motions in a nuclear gas disk". Nature. 400 (6744): 539–541. arXiv: astro-ph/9907013 . Bibcode:1999Natur.400..539H. doi:10.1038/22972. S2CID   204995005.
  24. Otto Neugebauer (1975). A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. Birkhäuser. p. 1084. ISBN   978-3-540-06995-9.
  25. "I. Considerations on the change of the latitudes of some of the principal fixt stars". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (in Latin). 30 (355): 736–738. 1719-12-31. doi:10.1098/rstl.1717.0025. ISSN   0261-0523.
  26. Staff (September 15, 2003). "The 150 Stars in the Hipparcos Catalogue with Largest Proper Motion". ESA. Retrieved 2007-07-21.
  27. "SIMBAD". Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2016-04-13.
  28. 1 2 Fabricius, C.; Makarov, V.V. (May 2000). "Hipparcos astrometry for 257 stars using Tycho-2 data". Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement. 144: 45–51. Bibcode:2000A&AS..144...45F. doi: 10.1051/aas:2000198 .