![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 424 seats in the Congress of Deputies [a] and all 200 seats in the Senate 213 seats needed for a majority in the Congress and 101 in the Senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turnout | 1,900,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A general election was held in Spain from Saturday, 24 August to Tuesday, 27 August 1872, to elect the members of the 3rd Cortes under the Spanish Constitution of 1869, during the Democratic Sexennium period. 406 of 424 seats in the Congress of Deputies and all 200 seats in the Senate were up for election. The election in Cuba was indefinitely postponed. [a]
Most of the opposition to the Radical Democratic Party of Manuel Ruiz Zorrilla opted to boycott the election—with the Carlists completely disengaging from electoral participation following the outbreak of the Third Carlist War in April—whereas for the Federal Democratic Republican Party only the "benevolent" faction chose to participate. As a result, the Radicals were able to secure a commanding parliamentary majority without needing to resort to electoral fraud, albeit under a low voter turnout.
The parliament elected in the April 1872 general election was short-lived, as the government of Práxedes Mateo Sagasta was forced to resign in May following a political scandal over a secret transfer of funds from an overseas savings bank (the Caja de Ultramar) to the Governance ministry that was allegedly used to pay for election expenses. [3] Following a 20-day government under Francisco Serrano, King Amadeo I appointed Manuel Ruiz Zorrilla as new prime minister, who formed a Radical Democratic Party cabinet and called a snap election to provide itself with a parliamentary majority. [3]
Zorrilla's government generally attempted to avoid resorting to fraud in the organization of the election process, instructing the provincial civil governors not to impose or recommend official candidates, reforming the census in those places where voters had been disenfranchised from the electoral roll—mostly to facilitate Sagasta's victory in April—and reinstating local councils which had been suspended. While this did not prevent the existence of allegations of government interference, the election was widely seen as more free and fair than previous ones. [4]
Most of the opposition to the Radical government had chosen not to participate in the election: the Constitutional Party and the Alfonsists fielded few candidates, mostly opting for a strategy of "retreat" (retraimiento, akin to election boycott), whereas for the Federal Democratic Republican Party only the "benevolent" faction chose to participate. [5] Discontent with Amadeo's proclamation as King of Spain paved the way for Carlists to withdraw from electoral participation and wage the Third Carlist War in favour of their pretender, Carlos de Borbón, who tried to earn the support of various Spanish regions by promising to reintroduce various area-specific customs and laws (particularly, the Catalan, Valencian and Aragonese fueros which had been abolished at the beginning of the 18th century by King Philip V in his unilateral Nueva Planta decrees).
Under the 1869 Constitution, the Spanish Cortes were envisaged as "co-legislative bodies", based on a nearly perfect bicameral system. [6] Both the Congress of Deputies and the Senate had legislative, control and budgetary functions, sharing equal powers except for laws on contributions, public credit or military force, the first reading of which corresponded to Congress—which also had preeminence in case of disagreement—and impeachment processes against government ministers, in which each chamber had separate powers of indictment (Congress) and trial (Senate). [7] [8] Voting for each chamber of the Cortes was on the basis of universal manhood suffrage, which comprised all national males over 25 years of age and in full enjoyment of their civil rights. [9] [10] [11] In Puerto Rico, voting was on the basis of censitary suffrage, comprising males of age fulfilling one of the following criteria: being literate or taxpayers with a minimum quota of 16 escudos. [12] [13] Voters were required to not being sentenced—by a final court ruling—to disqualification from political rights, to afflictive penalties not legally rehabilitated; neither being criminally prosecuted with an arrest warrant not substituted with bail; nor homeless. [14] [15] [16]
The Congress of Deputies was entitled to one member per each 40,000 inhabitants or fraction greater than 20,000. Seats were allocated to single-member districts—406 for the August 1872 election—distributed among the provinces of Spain and Puerto Rico in proportion to their populations, and elected using plurality voting. [17] [18] [19] [20] 18 additional seats were awarded to multi-member constituencies in the island of Cuba, where elections (as well as the updating of district divisions to comply with the new electoral law) were indefinitely postponed due to the military situation. [2] [21]
For the Senate, 200 seats were elected using an indirect, write-in, two-round majority voting system. Voters in each local council elected delegates—equivalent in number to one-sixth of the councillors, with an initial minimum of one—who, together with provincial deputies, would in turn vote for senators. Each province, as well as the whole of Puerto Rico, was allocated four seats. [20] [22] [23]
The law provided for by-elections to fill seats vacated in the Congress throughout the legislature's term. [24] By-elections were not required in the Senate, with vacancies being filled in the next regular election of the chamber. [25]
For the Congress, Spanish citizens with the legal capacity to vote could run for election, provided that they were not holders of government-appointed offices. [26] [27] A number of positions were exempt from ineligibility, provided that no more than 40 deputies benefitted from these: [28]
For the Senate, eligibility was limited to Spanish citizens over 40 years of age and in full enjoyment of their civil rights, provided that they belonged or had belonged to one of the following categories: [29] [30]
Other causes of ineligibility for both chambers were imposed on territorial-level officers in government bodies and institutions—during their tenure of office and up to three months after their dismissal—in constituencies within the whole or part of their respective area of jurisdiction; contractors of public works or services; tax collectors and their guarantors; and debtors of public funds (including their substitutes or jointly liable parties); [31] additionally for Puerto Rico, ineligibility extended to those having been convicted of crimes related to the repression of slave trade. [32] Incompatibility provisions extended to the impossibility of simultaneously holding the positions of deputy, senator, provincial deputy and local councillor, as well as serving by two or more parliamentary constituencies. [33] [34]
The term of each chamber of the Cortes—the Congress and one-quarter of the Senate—expired three years from the date of their previous election, unless they were dissolved earlier. [35] The previous election was held on 2 April 1872, which meant that the chambers' terms would have expired on 2 April 1875. The monarch had the prerogative to dissolve both chambers at any given time—either jointly or separately—and call a snap election. [36] Only elections to renew one-quarter of the Senate were constitutionally required to be held concurrently with elections to the Congress, though the former could be renewed in its entirety in the case that a full dissolution was agreed by the monarch. [35]
The Cortes were officially dissolved on 28 June 1872, with the dissolution decree setting the election dates from 24 to 27 August and scheduling for both chambers to reconvene on 15 September. [37] [38] In Cuba, elections were indefinitely postponed due to the outbreak of the Ten Years' War. [1] [2]
![]() | |||||
Parties and alliances | Popular vote | Seats | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Total | +/− | ||
Radical Democratic Party (PDR) | 1,321,338 | 69.54 | 274 | +232 | |
Federal Democratic Republican Party (PRDF) | 379,345 | 19.96 | 78 | +26 | |
Conservative–Constitutional Coalition (C–C) | 120,543 | 6.34 | 14 | −222 | |
Alfonsist Conservatives (A) | 36,325 | 1.91 | 9 | +9 | |
Independent Republicans (R.IND) | 9,502 | 0.50 | 2 | +2 | |
Liberal Reformist Party (PLR) | 9,463 | 0.50 | 14 | +10 | |
Independent Carlists (CARL.IND)1 | 5,870 | 0.31 | 3 | −35 | |
Liberal Conservative Party (PLC) | 1,292 | 0.07 | 1 | −10 | |
Moderate Party (PM) | n/a | n/a | 0 | −11 | |
Independents (INDEP) | 5,182 | 0.27 | 11 | −1 | |
Others | 11,320 | 0.60 | 0 | ±0 | |
Vacant [a] | 18 | ±0 | |||
Total | 1,900,180 | 424 | ±0 | ||
Votes cast / turnout | 1,900,180 | ||||
Abstentions | |||||
Registered voters | |||||
Sources [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] | |||||
Footnotes:
|