1886 Spanish general election

1886 Spanish general election

←  1884 4 April 1886 (Congress) 25 April 1886 (Senate) 1891  →
All 434 [a] seats in the Congress of Deputies and 180 (of 360) seats in the Senate 218 seats needed for a majority in the Congress of Deputies
Registered	807,175
Turnout	475,712 (58.9%)
First party Second party Third party   Leader Práxedes Mateo Sagasta Antonio Cánovas del Castillo Manuel Ruiz Zorrilla Party Liberal Conservative Republican Leader since 1880 1874 1880 Leader's seat Logroño Cieza — Last election 43 (C) ·15 (S) 342 (C) ·140 (S) 9 (C) ·0 (S) Seats won 309 (C) ·123 (S) 70 (C) ·33 (S) 20 (C) ·3 (S) Seat change 266 (C) · 108 (S) 272 (C) · 107 (S) 11 (C) · 3 (S)   Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party   Leader Francisco Romero Robledo Emilio Castelar José López Domínguez Party Liberal Reformist Possibilist Leftist Leader since 1886 1879 1884 Leader's seat Antequera Huesca Coín Last election Did not contest 3 (C) ·2 (S) 36 (C) ·8 (S) Seats won 11 (C) ·4 (S) 11 (C) ·4 (S) 12 (C) ·2 (S) Seat change 11 (C) · 4 (S) 8 (C) · 2 (S) 24 (C) · 6 (S)
Prime Minister before election Práxedes Mateo Sagasta Liberal Prime Minister after election Práxedes Mateo Sagasta Liberal

A general election was held in Spain on Sunday, 4 April (for the Congress of Deputies) and on Sunday, 25 April 1886 (for the Senate), to elect the members of the 4th Cortes under the Spanish Constitution of 1876, during the Restoration period. All 434 ^[a] seats in the Congress of Deputies were up for election, as well as 180 of 360 seats in the Senate. The electorate comprised about 4.6% of the country's population. ^[1]

During this period, an informal system known as turno or turnismo was operated by the country's two main parties—the Conservatives and the Liberals—to determine in advance the outcome of elections by means of electoral fraud, often achieved through the territorial clientelistic networks of local bosses (the caciques ), ensuring that both parties would have rotating periods in power. As a result, elections were often neither truly free nor fair, though they could be more competitive in the country's urban centres where caciquism was weaker.

The election resulted in a large majority for the government-supported candidates of the Liberal Party, which was possible through Antonio Cánovas del Castillo's peaceful handover of power to Práxedes Mateo Sagasta, in what came to be known as the Pact of El Pardo. Running against the pact were the Francisco Romero Robledo and José López Domínguez-led factions within the Conservative and Liberal parties, respectively, but which failed to achieve decisive breakthroughs. The resulting legislature would come to be known as the "Long Parliament" (Spanish: Parlamento Largo): lasting from 1886 to 1891, it would be the only one during the Restoration period to last its full five year-term. ^[2]

Background

Following the Bourbon Restoration in 1874, the Spanish Constitution of 1876 enshrined Spain as a semi-constitutional monarchy , awarding the monarch —under the royal prerogative —the right of legislative initiative together with the bicameral Cortes ; the capacity to veto laws passed by the legislative body; the power to appoint government members (including the prime minister ); the ability to grant or deny parliamentary dissolution , the adjournment of legislative sessions and the signature of royal decrees ; as well as the title of commander-in-chief of the armed forces . ^{[3] [4]} The monarch would play a key role in the turno system by appointing and dismissing governments, which would then organize elections to provide themselves with a parliamentary majority. This informal system allowed the two major " dynastic " political parties at the time, the Conservatives and the Liberals —characterized as oligarchic , elite parties with loose structures dominated by internal factions, each led by powerful individuals—to alternate in power by means of electoral fraud ( pucherazo ). This was achieved by assigning candidates to districts before the elections were held ( encasillado ), then arrange their victory through the links between the Ministry of Governance and the territorial clientelistic networks of provincial governors and local bosses (the caciques ), excluding minor parties from the power sharing. ^{[5] [6]}

The death of King Alfonso XII in November 1885 at the age of 27, with no heir apparent and with her spouse—Maria Christina of Austria—poised to become queen regent under the provisions of the Constitution, had seen a prospective political crisis being averted by the informal Pact of El Pardo between Antonio Cánovas del Castillo, incumbent prime minister and Conservative leader, and Práxedes Mateo Sagasta, leader of the opposition Liberal Party. Through the agreement, both political parties—which had dominated Spanish politics during the early Restoration period—aimed to temporarily thwart the political fighting within the monarchist camp and provide stability to the regime by definitely establishing the turno system of alternance. As a result, Cánovas peacefully handed over power to Sagasta, who earlier that year had unified the various factions within his party under the "guarantee law": an agreement under which the Liberals would develop the freedoms and rights recognized during the Democratic Sexennium in exchange for the acceptance of shared sovereignty between the King and the Cortes, a basic principle of the 1876 Constitution. ^{[7] [8]} Francisco Romero Robledo, who vied for power with Francisco Silvela within the Conservative party, split off in protest to Cánovas's "voluntary relinquishment" of government. ^{[9] [10] [11]} In May 1886, Maria Cristina would give birth to Alfonso XII's posthumous son, who would automatically become King Alfonso XIII. ^[12]

The 1884–1885 period saw some calamities that the Cánovas government had to handle, such as the Alcudia bridge disaster, the 1884 Andalusian earthquake and the 1885 cholera epidemic in Spain. It also saw the Berlin Conference, the starting point of the Scramble for Africa, in which Spain successfully claimed and established the colony of Spanish Sahara. The Carolines Question, a conflict between Spain and the German Empire over the sovereignty of the Caroline Islands and Palau in the western Pacific, was resolved through arbitration by the Holy See. ^[7]

Overview

Under the 1876 Constitution, the Spanish Cortes were envisaged as "co-legislative bodies", based on a nearly perfect bicameral system. ^[13] Both the Congress of Deputies and the Senate had legislative, control and budgetary functions, sharing equal powers except for laws on contributions or public credit, the first reading of which corresponded to Congress, and impeachment processes against government ministers, in which each chamber had separate powers of indictment (Congress) and trial (Senate). ^{[14] [15]}

Electoral system

Voting for the Congress of Deputies was on the basis of censitary suffrage, which comprised national males over 25 years of age fulfilling one of the following criteria: ^{[16] [17] [18] [19]}

• Being taxpayers with a minimum quota of Pts  25 per territorial contribution (paid at least one year in advance) or Pts 50 per industrial subsidy (paid at least two years in advance);
• Having a particular position (full academics in the royal academies; members of ecclesiastical councils, including parish priests; active public employees with a yearly salary of at least Pts 2,000; unemployed and retired public employees; general officers of the Army and Navy exempt from service, and retired military and naval chiefs and officers; reporters, chamber secretaries and court clerks of higher courts; and certified teachers);
• Painters and sculptors awarded in national or international exhibitions;
• Those having at least a two-year residency in a municipality, provided that an educational or professional capacity could be proven.

In Cuba and Puerto Rico, the taxpayer quota requirement was set at Pts 125 for both the territorial contribution and the industrial or trade subsidy. Those who, having been subject to servitude, had not been freed and exempt from patronage for at least three years, were barred from being electors in the Spanish West Indies. ^{[20] [21]} As a result of the Basque Provinces and Navarre not paying territorial and industrial contributions in individual installments—owing to their special chartered regime—electors in those territories were instead required to prove having a capital of Pts 2,400 in real estate, crops or livestock, or Pts 4,800 in industry, commerce, profession or trade. ^[22] Additionally, voters were required to not being sentenced—by a final court ruling—to perpetual disqualification from political rights or public offices, to afflictive penalties not legally rehabilitated at least two years in advance, nor to other criminal penalties that remained unserved at the time of the election; neither being legally incapacitated, bankrupt, insolvent, nor debtors of public funds (including their substitutes or jointly liable parties). ^{[16] [20]}

The Congress of Deputies was entitled to one seat per each 50,000 inhabitants. 111 members were elected in 31 multi-member constituencies using a partial block voting system: in constituencies electing eight seats, electors could vote for up to six candidates; in those with seven seats, for up to five candidates; in those with six seats, for up to four; and in those with four or five seats, for up to three candidates. The remaining 322 seats were elected in single-member districts using plurality voting and distributed among the provinces of Spain and the Spanish West Indies in proportion to their populations. ^{[23] [24] [25] [26]} Up to ten additional members could be elected through cumulative voting in several single-member districts, provided that they obtained more than 10,000 votes overall. ^[27]

As a result of the aforementioned allocation, each Congress multi-member constituency was entitled the following seats: ^{[24] [28]}

Seats	Constituencies
8	Havana, Madrid
5	Barcelona, Palma, Santa Clara
4	Santiago de Cuba, Seville
3	Alicante, Almería, Badajoz, Burgos, Cádiz, Cartagena, Córdoba, Granada, Jaén, Jerez de la Frontera, La Coruña, Lugo, Málaga, Matanzas, Murcia, Oviedo, Pamplona, Pinar del Río, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santander, Tarragona, Valencia, Valladolid, Zaragoza

Voting for the elective part of the Senate was on the basis of censitary suffrage, which comprised archbishops and bishops (in the ecclesiastical councils); full academics (in the royal academies); rectors, full professors, enrolled doctors, directors of secondary education institutes and heads of special schools in their respective territories (in the universities); members with at least a three-year-old membership (in the economic societies of Friends of the Country); major taxpayers and Spanish citizens of age, being householders residing in Spain and in full enjoyment of their political and civil rights (for delegates in the local councils); and provincial deputies. ^[29]

180 seats in the Senate were elected using an indirect, write-in, two-round majority voting system. Voters in the economic societies, the local councils and major taxpayers elected delegates—equivalent in number to one per each 50 members (in each economic society) or to one-sixth of the councillors (in each local council), with an initial minimum of one—who, together with other voting-able electors, would in turn vote for senators. The provinces of Álava, Albacete, Ávila, Biscay, Cuenca, Guadalajara, Guipúzcoa, Huelva, Logroño, Matanzas, Palencia, Pinar del Río, Puerto Príncipe, Santa Clara, Santander, Santiago de Cuba, Segovia, Soria, Teruel, Valladolid and Zamora were allocated two seats each, whereas each of the remaining provinces was allocated three seats, for a total of 147. ^[30] The remaining 33 were allocated to special districts comprising a number of institutions, electing one seat each: the archdioceses of Burgos, Granada, Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Cuba, Seville, Tarragona, Toledo, Valencia, Valladolid and Zaragoza; the six oldest royal academies (the Royal Spanish; History; Fine Arts of San Fernando; Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences; Moral and Political Sciences and Medicine); the universities of Madrid, Barcelona, Granada, Havana, Oviedo, Salamanca, Santiago, Seville, Valencia, Valladolid and Zaragoza; and the economic societies of Friends of the Country from Madrid, Barcelona, Havana–Puerto Rico, León, Seville and Valencia. ^{[31] [32] [33] [34]}

An additional 180 seats comprised senators in their own right—the monarch's offspring and the heir apparent once coming of age; grandees of Spain with an annual income of at least Pts 60,000 (from their own real estate or from rights that enjoy the same legal consideration); captain generals of the Army and admirals of the Navy; the Patriarch of the Indies and archbishops; and the presidents of the Council of State, the Supreme Court, the Court of Auditors and the Supreme Council of War and Navy, after two years of service—as well as senators for life appointed directly by the monarch. ^[31]

The law provided for by-elections to fill seats vacated in both the Congress and Senate throughout the legislative term. ^{[35] [36]}

Eligibility

For the Congress, Spanish citizens of age, of secular status, in full enjoyment of their civil rights and with the legal capacity to vote could run for election, provided that they were not contractors of public works or services, within the territorial scope of their contracts, in the year prior to the election; nor holders of government-appointed offices, presidents of provincial deputations and members of their permanent commissions, local mayors and deputy mayors, as well as presidents of polling stations and civil, mining and forest engineers—during their tenure of office and up to one year after their dismissal—in constituencies within the whole or part of their respective area of jurisdiction; ^{[37] [38]} additionally for the Spanish West Indies, those who, having been subject to servitude, had not been freed and exempt from patronage for at least ten years, were barred from running. ^[39] A number of other positions were exempt from ineligibility, provided that no more than 40 deputies benefitted from these: ^[40]

• Civil, military and judicial positions with a permanent residence in Madrid and a yearly public salary of at least Pts 12,500;
• The holders of a number of positions: the president, prosecutors and chamber presidents of the territorial court of Madrid; the rector and full professors of the Central University of Madrid; inspectors of engineers; and general officers of the Army and Navy based in Madrid.

For the Senate, eligibility was limited to Spanish citizens over 35 years of age and not subject to criminal prosecution, disfranchisement nor asset seizure, provided that they were entitled to be appointed as senators in their own right or belonged or had belonged to one of the following categories: ^{[41] [42]}

• Those who had ever served as senators before the promulgation of the 1876 Constitution; and deputies having served in at least three different congresses or eight terms;
• The holders of a number of positions: presidents of the Senate and the Congress; government ministers; bishops; grandees of Spain not eligible as senators in their own right; and presidents and directors of the royal academies;
• Provided an annual income of at least Pts 7,500 from either their own property, salaries from jobs that cannot be lost except for legally proven cause, or from retirement, withdrawal or termination: full academics of the aforementioned corporations on the first half of the seniority scale in their corps; first-class inspectors-general of the corps of civil, mining and forest engineers; and full professors with at least four years of seniority in their category and practice;
• Provided two prior years of service: Army's lieutenant generals and Navy's vice admirals; and other members and prosecutors of the Council of State, the Supreme Court, the Court of Auditors, the Supreme Council of War and Navy, and the dean of the Court of Military Orders;
• Ambassadors after two years of service and plenipotentiaries after four;
• Those with an annual income of Pts 20,000 or were taxpayers with a minimum quota of Pts 4,000 in direct contributions at least two years in advance, provided that they either belonged to the Spanish nobility, had been previously deputies, provincial deputies or mayors in provincial capitals or towns over 20,000 inhabitants.

Other causes of ineligibility for the Senate were imposed on territorial-level officers in government bodies and institutions—during their tenure of office and up to three months after their dismissal—in constituencies within the whole or part of their respective area of jurisdiction; contractors of public works or services; tax collectors and their guarantors; debtors of public funds (including their substitutes or jointly liable parties); deputies; local councillors (except those in Madrid); and provincial deputies by their respective provinces. ^[43]

Election date

The term of each chamber of the Cortes—the Congress and one-half of the elective part of the Senate—expired five years from the date of their previous election, unless they were dissolved earlier. ^[44] The previous elections were held on 27 April 1884 for the Congress and on 8 May 1884 for the Senate, which meant that the chambers' terms would have expired on 27 April and 8 May 1889, respectively.

The monarch had the prerogative to dissolve both chambers at any given time—either jointly or separately—and call a snap election. ^{[45] [46]} There was no constitutional requirement for concurrent elections to the Congress and the Senate, nor for the elective part of the Senate to be renewed in its entirety except in the case that a full dissolution was agreed by the monarch. Still, there was only one case of a separate election (for the Senate in 1877) and no half-Senate elections taking place under the 1876 Constitution.

The Cortes were officially dissolved on 8 March 1886, with the dissolution decree setting the election dates for 4 April (for the Congress) and 25 April 1886 (for the Senate) and scheduling for both chambers to reconvene on 10 May. ^[47]

Results

Congress of Deputies

← Summary of the 4 April 1886 Congress of Deputies election results →

Parties and alliances		Popular vote		Seats
		Votes	%
	Liberal Party (PL)			309
	Liberal Conservative Party (PLC)			70
	Republican Union (UR)			20
	Dynastic Left (ID)			12
	Liberal Reformist Party (PLR)			11
	Possibilist Democratic Party (PDP)			11
	Traditionalist Communion (Carlist) (CT)			1
Total		475,712		434
Votes cast / turnout		475,712	58.94
Abstentions		331,463	41.06
Registered voters		807,175
Sources [48] [49] [50]

Seats PL   71.20% PLC   16.13% UR   4.61% ID   2.76% PLR   2.53% PDP   2.53% CT   0.23%

Senate

← Summary of the 25 April 1886 Senate of Spain election results →

Parties and alliances		Seats
	Liberal Party (PL)	123
	Liberal Conservative Party (PLC)	33
	Liberal Reformist Party (PLR)	4
	Possibilist Democratic Party (PDP)	4
	Republican Union (UR)	3
	Dynastic Left (ID)	2
	Independents (INDEP)	1
	Archbishops (ARCH)	10
Total elective seats		180
Sources [51]

Seats PL   68.33% PLC   18.33% PLR   2.22% PDP   2.22% UR   1.67% ID   1.11% INDEP   0.56% ARCH   5.56%

Distribution by group

Summary of political group distribution in the 4th Restoration Cortes (1886–1891)

Group		Parties and alliances		C	S	Total
	PL		Liberal Party (PL)	290	112	432
			Constitutional Union of Cuba (UCC)	12	8
			Unconditional Spanish Party (PIE)	6	2
			Basque Dynastics (Urquijist) (DV)	1	1
	PLC		Liberal Conservative Party (PLC)	63	27	103
			Constitutional Union of Cuba (UCC)	3	5
			Unconditional Spanish Party (PIE)	4	1
	UR		Progressive Republican Party (PRP)	10	1	23
			Autonomist Liberal Party (PLA)	6	1
			Liberal Reformist Party of Puerto Rico (PLRP)	3	1
			Federal Republican Party (PRF)	1	0
	PLR		Liberal Reformist Party (PLR)	9	4	15
			Constitutional Union of Cuba (UCC)	2	0
	PDP		Possibilist Democratic Party (PDP)	11	4	15
	ID		Dynastic Left (ID)	8	2	14
			Unconditional Spanish Party (PIE)	2	0
			Constitutional Union of Cuba (UCC)	1	0
			Independents (INDEP)	1	0
	CT		Traditionalist Communion (Carlist) (CT)	1	0	1
	INDEP		Basque Dynastics (Urquijist) (DV)	0	1	1
	ARCH		Archbishops (ARCH)	0	10	10
Total				434	180	614

Notes

1. Including one seat by cumulative voting.

References

1. Caballero Domínguez 1999, p. 50.
2. Martínez Ruiz, Maqueda Abreu & De Diego 1999, p. 111.
3. Calero 1987, p. 275.
4. Constitution (1876), arts. 18, 22, 32, 41, 44 & 51–54.
5. Martorell Linares 1997, pp. 139–143.
6. Martínez Relanzón 2017, pp. 147–148.
7. De la Santa Cinta, Joaquín (9 August 2017). "Presidentes del Consejo de Ministros durante el reinado de Alfonso XII. José Posada Herrera y de nuevo Antonio Cánovas del Castillo". El Correo de Pozuelo (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 May 2023.
8. De la Santa Cinta, Joaquín (16 August 2017). "Presidentes del Consejo de Ministros durante la Regencia de María Cristina de Habsburgo-Lorena: Práxedes Mateo Sagasta". El Correo de Pozuelo (in Spanish). Retrieved 4 May 2023.
9. Fernández Almagro 1943, p. 412.
10. Dardé Morales 1986, pp. 224–226.
11. Montagut, Eduardo (24 November 2016). "El Gobierno de Sagasta (1885-1890)". Nueva Tribuna (in Spanish). Retrieved 21 August 2022.
12. Moral Roncal, Antonio Manuel (3 May 2024). "Cánovas en 1885: una dimisión del gobierno anteponiendo el bienestar de los españoles". El Debate (in Spanish). Retrieved 3 August 2025.
13. Constitution (1876) , arts. 18–19 & 41.
14. Constitution (1876) , arts. 38, 42 & 45.
15. "Conocer el Senado. Temas clave. El Senado en la historia constitucional española" (in Spanish). Senate of Spain . Retrieved 11 October 2025.
16. Law of 28 December (1878) , arts. 14–20.
17. Ortega Álvarez & Santaolaya Machetti 1996, p. 87.
18. García Muñoz 2002, pp. 105–106.
19. Carreras de Odriozola & Tafunell Sambola 2005, p. 1077.
20. Law of 28 December (1878) , arts. 142–143.
21. Roldán de Montaud 1999, p. 249.
22. Law of 28 December (1878) , trans. art. 1.
23. Constitution (1876) , arts. 27–28.
24. Law of 28 December (1878) , arts. 1–3 & 84, applying Law of 1 January (1871) , art. 1. District boundaries were further modified by the Law of 21 March (1883) and the Law of 23 June (1885).
25. Decree of 1 April (1871) , arts. 2–3.
26. Ortega Álvarez & Santaolaya Machetti 1996, p. 88.
27. Law of 28 December (1878) , art. 115.
28. Roldán de Montaud 1999, p. 250.
29. Law of 8 February (1877) , arts. 1–3, 12–13 & 25.
30. Real decreto determinando el número de Senadores que habrán de elegirse en cada una de las provincias con motivo de las próximas elecciones (PDF) (Royal Decree). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 30 June 1881. Retrieved 11 October 2025.
31. Constitution (1876) , arts. 20–21.
32. Law of 8 February (1877) , arts. 1–2, 21–22, 30–31 & 53.
33. Law of 9 January (1879) , arts. 1–3.
34. Carreras de Odriozola & Tafunell Sambola 2005, p. 1083.
35. Law of 8 February (1877) , arts. 56–59.
36. Law of 28 December (1878) , arts. 110–113.
37. Constitution (1876) , arts. 29 & 31.
38. Law of 28 December (1878) , arts. 7–10.
39. Law of 28 December (1878) , art. 141.
40. Law of 7 March (1880) , arts. 1–4.
41. Constitution (1876) , arts. 22 & 26.
42. Law of 8 February (1877) , art. 4.
43. Law of 8 February (1877) , arts. 5–9.
44. Constitution (1876) , arts. 24 & 30.
45. Constitution (1876) , art. 32.
46. Law of 8 February (1877) , art. 11.
47. Real decreto declarando disueltos el Congreso de los Diputados y la parte electiva del Senado, señalando el día 10 de Mayo próximo para reunirse las Cortes, y disponiendo que las elecciones de Diputados se verifiquen el 4 de Abril, y las de Senadores el 25 del mismo (PDF) (Royal Decree). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 8 March 1886. Retrieved 18 August 2025.
48. Armengol i Segú & Varela Ortega 2001, pp. 655–776.
49. López Domínguez 1976, pp. 410–433.
50. For elected candidates by district, with political affiliations:
    • "Noticias electorales. Madrid y provincias". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Siglo Futuro. 5 April 1886. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
    • "Las nuevas Cortes. Elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Estandarte. 5 April 1886. Retrieved 4 August 2025.
    • "Las elecciones. Vencedores y vencidos". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Día. 5 April 1886. Retrieved 4 August 2025.
    • "Elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Discusión. 6 April 1886. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
    • "Resultado de las elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 6 April 1886. Retrieved 13 August 2022.
    • "Los diputados a Cortes". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Liberal. 6 April 1886. Retrieved 15 August 2022.
    • "Candidatos electos". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Día. 6 April 1886. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
    • "La votación de anteayer". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La República. 6 April 1886. Retrieved 4 August 2025.
    • "Las elecciones en provincias". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Marina. 7 April 1886. Retrieved 4 August 2025.
    • "Las elecciones generales". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Imparcial. 7 April 1886. Retrieved 4 August 2025.
    For elected candidates in Cuba, with political affiliations:
    • "Las elecciones generales". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Iberia. 7 April 1886. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
    For elected candidates in Puerto Rico, with political affiliations:
    • "Las elecciones generales". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Imparcial. 8 April 1886. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
51. For elected candidates by district, with political affiliations:
    • "La elección de senadores en Madrid". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Día. 25 April 1886. Retrieved 13 August 2025.
    • "Elección de senadores. Provincias, Universidades, Sociedades económicas, Provincias eclesiásticas y Academias". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Liberal. 26 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
    • "El Senado". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Día. 26 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
    • "La elección de senadores. Nuevos datos". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 26 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
    • "Elecciones de senadores. Cabildos, Universidades, Sociedades económicas, Academias y Provincias". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Unión. 26 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
    For elected candidates in Puerto Rico, with political affiliations:
    • "Según telegrama del Gobernador general de Puerto Rico". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 27 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
    • "Elecciones de senadores. Madrid y provincias". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Imparcial. 28 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
    For elected candidates in Cuba, with political affiliations:
    • "Los senadores de Cuba". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Época. 28 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
    • "Los senadores elegidos en la isla de Cuba". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Unión. 29 April 1886. Retrieved 19 August 2022.

Bibliography

• Ley mandando que los distritos para las elecciones de Diputados a Cortes sean los que se expresan en la división adjunta (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 1 January 1871. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
• Decreto mandando se verifiquen en Puerto Rico las elecciones ordinarias de Senadores y Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Decree). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 1 April 1871. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Constitución de la Monarquía Española (PDF) (Constitution). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 30 June 1876. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Ley electoral de Senadores (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 8 February 1877. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Ley electoral de los Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 28 December 1878. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Ley dictando reglas para la elección de Senadores en las islas de Cuba y Puerto Rico (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 9 January 1879. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Ley enumerando los empleos con los cuales es compatible el cargo de Diputado a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 7 March 1880. Retrieved 15 August 2025.
• Ley fijando la división de la provincia de Vizcaya en distritos para la elección de Diputados a Cortes y la de aquellos en secciones (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 21 March 1883. Retrieved 3 August 2025.
• Ley dividiendo la provincia de Guipúzcoa en distritos para la elección de Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Madrid Gazette (in Spanish). 23 June 1885. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
• Fernández Almagro, Melchor (1943). "Las Cortes del siglo XIX y la práctica electoral" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (9–10). Madrid: Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies: 383–419. ISSN   0048-7694 . Retrieved 16 December 2020.
• López Domínguez, José María (1976). Elecciones y partidos políticos de Puerto Rico: 1809-1898 (PDF) (Thesis) (in Spanish). Vol. 1. Puerto Rico: Complutense University of Madrid . Retrieved 11 September 2022.
• Calero, Antonio María (1987). "La prerrogativa regia en la Restauración: teoría y práctica (1875-1902)" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (55). Madrid: Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies: 273–315. ISSN   0048-7694.
• Dardé Morales, Carlos (1986). "Las elecciones de diputados de 1886" (PDF). Anales de la Universidad de Alicante. Historia Contemporánea (in Spanish) (5): 223–259. doi: 10.14198/AnContemp.1986.5.10 . ISSN   0212-5080 . Retrieved 18 December 2020.
• Ortega Álvarez, Luis; Santaolaya Machetti, Pablo (1996). "Evolución histórica del sistema electoral español". Revista de las Cortes Generales (in Spanish). 37. Cortes Generales: 65–107. doi: 10.33426/rcg/1996/37/784 . ISSN   0213-0130.
• Martorell Linares, Miguel Ángel (1997). "La crisis parlamentaria de 1913-1917. La quiebra del sistema de relaciones parlamentarias de la Restauración" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (96). Madrid: Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies: 137–161. ISSN   0048-7694.
• Caballero Domínguez, Margarita (1999). "El derecho de representación: sufragio y leyes electorales" (PDF). Ayer (in Spanish) (34): 41–63. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
• Martínez Ruiz, Enrique; Maqueda Abreu, Consuelo; De Diego, Emilio (1999). Atlas histórico de España. La Regencia de María Cristina (1885-1902) (in Spanish). Vol. 2. Bilbao: Ediciones KAL. pp. 109–120. ISBN   9788470903502.
• Roldán de Montaud, Inés (1999). "Política y elecciones en Cuba durante la restauración" (PDF). Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (104): 245–287. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
• Armengol i Segú, Josep; Varela Ortega, José (2001). El poder de la influencia: geografía del caciquismo en España (1875-1923) (in Spanish). Madrid: Marcial Pons. pp. 655–776. ISBN   9788425911521.
• García Muñoz, Montserrat (2002). "La documentación electoral y el fichero histórico de diputados". Revista General de Información y Documentación (in Spanish). 12 (1): 93–137. ISSN   1132-1873 . Retrieved 13 September 2020.
• Carreras de Odriozola, Albert; Tafunell Sambola, Xavier (2005) [1989]. Estadísticas históricas de España, siglos XIX-XX (PDF) (in Spanish). Vol. 1 (II ed.). Bilbao: Fundación BBVA. pp. 1072–1097. ISBN   84-96515-00-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015.
• Martínez Relanzón, Alejandro (2017). "Political Modernization in Spain Between 1876 and 1923". Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio K. 24 (1). Madrid: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University: 145–154. doi: 10.17951/k.2017.24.1.145 . S2CID   159328027.
• Sánchez Ortiz, Modesto; Berástegui, Fermín (2018). Las Primeras Cámaras de la Regencia: Datos Electorales, Estadísticos y Biográficos (PDF) (in Spanish). Madrid: Forgotten Books. ISBN   9780366929764.