1901 Spanish general election

1901 Spanish general election

←  1899 19 May 1901 (Congress) 2 June 1901 (Senate) [a] 1903  →
All 402 seats in the Congress of Deputies and 180 (of 360) seats in the Senate 202 seats needed for a majority in the Congress of Deputies
First party Second party Third party   Leader Práxedes Mateo Sagasta Francisco Silvela Francisco Pi y Margall Party Liberal Conservative Republican Leader since 1880 1899 1901 Leader's seat Logroño Piedrahita Barcelona Last election 92 (C) ·47 (S) 240 (C) ·103 (S) 13 (C) ·1 (S) [b] Seats won 246 (C) ·116 (S) 76 (C) ·38 (S) 15 (C) ·3 (S) Seat change 154 (C) · 69 (S) 164 (C) · 65 (S) 2 (C) · 2 (S)   Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party   Leader Germán Gamazo Carlos O'Donnell Francisco Romero Robledo Party Gamacist Tetuanist Liberal Reformist Leader since 1899 1898 1898 Leader's seat Medina del Campo Senator (for life) Antequera Last election 32 (C) ·7 (S) 11 (C) ·7 (S) 3 (C) ·1 (S) Seats won 15 (C) ·3 (S) 10 (C) ·7 (S) 12 (C) ·2 (S) Seat change 17 (C) · 4 (S) 1 (C) · 0 (S) 9 (C) · 1 (S)
Election results by constituency (Congress)
Prime Minister before election Práxedes Mateo Sagasta Liberal Prime Minister after election Práxedes Mateo Sagasta Liberal

The 1901 Spanish general election was held on Sunday, 19 May (for the Congress of Deputies) and on Sunday, 2 June 1901 (for the Senate), ^[a] to elect the 10th Cortes of the Kingdom of Spain in the Restoration period. All 402 seats in the Congress of Deputies were up for election, as well as 180 of 360 seats in the Senate.

Conservative prime minister Francisco Silvela resigned in late 1900 as a result of social, political and ecclesiastical backlash resulting from both a tax reform adopted by finance minister Raimundo Fernández-Villaverde and the conflictive marriage between Princess of Asturias María de las Mercedes and Infante Carlos of Bourbon. Práxedes Mateo Sagasta formed a new government in March 1901, the so-called "Electra cabinet"—in reference to the Benito Pérez Galdós's Electra play which caused a public uproar that hastened the fall of the previous cabinet led by Marcelo Azcárraga—and immediately sought a parliamentary majority for his Liberal Party by triggering a snap election.

The election resulted in a Liberal-dominated parliament that saw new parties such as the regenerationist National Union or the Catalan-based Regionalist League gaining seats for the first time. This would be Sagasta's final electoral contest, as he would resign as prime minister in December 1902 and die on 5 January 1903, aged 77, as a result of bronchopneumonia.

Overview

Electoral system

The Spanish Cortes were envisaged as "co-legislative bodies", based on a nearly perfect bicameral system. ^[6] Both the Congress of Deputies and the Senate had legislative, control and budgetary functions, sharing equal powers except for laws on contributions or public credit, where the Congress had preeminence, and judicial matters, where preeminence was vested in the Senate. ^{[7] [8]} Voting for the Cortes was on the basis of universal manhood suffrage, which comprised all national males over 25 years of age, having at least a two-year residency in a municipality and in full enjoyment of their civil rights. ^{[9] [10] [11]}

For the Congress of Deputies, 92 seats were elected using a partial block voting system in 26 multi-member constituencies, with the remaining 310 being elected under a one-round first-past-the-post system in single-member districts. Candidates winning a plurality in each constituency were elected. In constituencies electing eight seats or more, electors could vote for no more than three candidates less than the number of seats to be allocated; in those with more than four seats and up to eight, for no more than two less; in those with more than one seat and up to four, for no more than one less; and for one candidate in single-member districts. The Congress was entitled to one member per each 50,000 inhabitants, with each multi-member constituency being allocated a fixed number of seats. Additionally, literary universities, economic societies of Friends of the Country and officially organized chambers of commerce, industry and agriculture were entitled to one seat per each 5,000 registered voters that they comprised. ^{[12] [13]}

As a result of the aforementioned allocation, each Congress multi-member constituency was entitled the following seats: ^{[14] [15]}

Seats	Constituencies
8	Madrid
7	Barcelona
5	Palma, Seville
4	Cartagena (+1)
3	Alicante, Almería, Badajoz, Burgos, Cádiz, Córdoba, Granada, Jaén, Jerez de la Frontera, La Coruña, Lugo, Málaga, Murcia, Oviedo, Pamplona, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santander, Tarragona, Valencia, Valladolid, Zaragoza

For the Senate, 180 seats were indirectly elected by the local councils and major taxpayers, with electors voting for delegates instead of senators. Elected delegates—equivalent in number to one-sixth of the councillors in each local council—would then vote for senators using a write-in, two-round majority voting system. Following a redistribution of the 19 senators allocated to Cuba and Puerto Rico as a result of the loss by Spain of these colonies, the provinces of Barcelona, Madrid and Valencia were allocated four seats each, whereas each of the remaining provinces was allocated three seats, for a total of 150. The remaining 30 were allocated to special districts comprising a number of institutions, electing one seat each—the archdioceses of Burgos, Granada, Santiago de Compostela, Seville, Tarragona, Toledo, Valencia, Valladolid and Zaragoza; the Royal Spanish Academy; the other royal academies (History; Fine Arts of San Fernando; Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences; Moral and Political Sciences and Medicine); the universities of Madrid, Barcelona, Granada, Oviedo, Salamanca, Santiago, Seville, Valencia, Valladolid and Zaragoza; and the economic societies of Friends of the Country from Madrid, Barcelona, León, Seville and Valencia. An additional 180 seats comprised senators in their own right—the monarch's offspring and the heir apparent once coming of age; Grandees of Spain with an annual income of at least 60,000 Pt (from their own real estate or from rights that enjoy the same legal consideration); Captain Generals of the Army and the Navy Admiral; the Patriarch of the Indies and archbishops; and the presidents of the Council of State, the Supreme Court, the Court of Auditors, the Supreme War Council and the Supreme Council of the Navy, after two years of service—as well as senators for life appointed directly by the monarch. ^{[16] [17] [18]}

Election date

The term of each chamber of the Cortes—the Congress and one-half of the elective part of the Senate—expired five years from the date of their previous election, unless they were dissolved earlier. The previous Congress and Senate elections were held on 16 April and 30 April 1899, which meant that the legislature's terms would have expired on 16 April and 30 April 1904, respectively. The monarch had the prerogative to dissolve both chambers at any given time—either jointly or separately—and call a snap election. ^{[19] [20]} There was no constitutional requirement for concurrent elections to the Congress and the Senate, nor for the elective part of the Senate to be renewed in its entirety except in the case that a full dissolution was agreed by the monarch. Still, there was only one case of a separate election (for the Senate in 1877) and no half-Senate elections taking place under the 1876 Constitution.

The Cortes were officially dissolved on 24 April 1901, with the dissolution decree setting the election dates for 19 May (for the Congress) and 2 June 1901 (for the Senate) and scheduling for both chambers to reconvene on 11 June. ^[21]

Background

The Spanish Constitution of 1876 enshrined Spain as a constitutional monarchy , awarding the monarch the right of legislative initiative together with the bicameral Cortes; the capacity to veto laws passed by the legislative body; the power to appoint senators and government ministers; as well as the title of commander-in-chief of the army and navy. The monarch would play a key role in the system of el turno pacífico (English: the Peaceful Turn) by appointing and dismissing governments and allowing the opposition to take power. Under this informal system, the major political parties at the time, the Conservatives and the Liberals —characterized as elite parties with loose structures dominated by internal factions, each led by powerful individuals—alternated in power by means of election rigging , which they achieved through the encasillado , assignating the seats in the general elections before they were held by using the links between the Ministry of Governance , the provincial civil governors and the local bosses ( caciques ) to ensure victory and exclude minor parties from the power sharing. ^{[22] [23]} The result was "a liberal system without democracy". ^[24]

In March 1899, Conservative leader Francisco Silvela formed a regenerationist government that aimed at implementing a program of reforms to address the causes of Spain's decline as a nation—self-evidenced in the country's defeat in the Spanish–American War and the subsequent loss of the Spanish colonies in the Caribbean and Pacific. ^[25] However, Silvela was forced to resign as prime minister and cede power to Marcelo Azcárraga in October 1900, following the political and social backlash resulting from both the tax reform adopted by his finance minister, Raimundo Fernández-Villaverde—which, while intending to reduce the national debt caused by the war in Cuba, sparked a wave of protests and strikes—and the conflictive marriage between Princess of Asturias María de las Mercedes and Infante Carlos of Bourbon, whose father had fought in the Carlist side during the Third Carlist War. ^{[26] [27]} Further, the Carlist uprising of October 1900—an attempted armed insurrection originating in Badalona which spread to other towns in Spain—had led to the suspension of constitutional freedoms in a number of provinces for several months. ^{[28] [29]} Azcárraga's government fell in March 1901, unable to deal with these issues and amid a wave of anti-clericalism propelled by Benito Pérez Galdós's Electra play—which caused a storm of both outrage and uproar—, being replaced by a Liberal Party government under Práxedes Mateo Sagasta, the so-called "Electra cabinet". ^{[30] [31] [32]}

Concurrently, regenerationism saw the rise of movements opposed to the Cánovas-founded political system. On the one hand, the establishment of the regenerationist National Union (UN) party by Joaquín Costa and Santiago Alba. ^[33] On the other hand, Catalan regionalism was invigorated following Silvela's refusal to meet their demands and a growing disaffection among the Catalan middle and industrial classes, which in turn led to the establishment throughout 1899 of the liberal conservative Catalan National Centre (CNC) and the Regionalist Union (UR). Both parties would merge in April 1901 into the Regionalist League (LR).

Candidates

For the Congress, Spanish citizens of age and with the legal capacity to vote could run for election, provided that they were not sentenced to perpetual disqualification from political rights or public offices by a final court's decision, or to afflictive penalties if no legal rehabilitation had been obtained at least two years in advance of the election, or to other criminal penalties if the serving of the sentence could not be proven before taking the office of deputy. Other causes of ineligibility were imposed on those physically or morally incapacitated; bankrupt or insolvent persons who had not paid out their debts; and contractors of public works or services; as well as a number of territorial-level officers in government bodies and institutions being barred from running, during their tenure of office, in constituencies within the whole or part of their respective area of jurisdiction. ^{[34] [35]}

For the Senate, eligibility was limited to those entitled to be appointed as senators in their own right or those who had belonged to one of the following categories: presidents of the Senate and the Congress of Deputies; deputies who had belonged to at least three different congresses or serving for at least eight terms; government ministers; other Grandees of Spain; Army's lieutenant generals and Navy's vice admirals, two years after their appointment; ambassadors after two years of service and plenipotentiary ministers after four; other members and prosecutors of the Council of State, the Supreme Court, the Court of Auditors, the Supreme War Council and the Supreme Council of the Navy, and the Dean of the Court of Military Orders, after two years of service; presidents and directors of the Royal Spanish Academy and the other royal academies (History; Fine Arts of San Fernando; Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences; Moral and Political Sciences and Medicine); full academics of the aforementioned corporations occupying the first half of the seniority scale in their corps, first-class general inspectors of the corps of Civil Engineers, Mines and Forests, full-time university professors with at least four years of seniority in their category and practice (and provided that those had an annual income of at least 7,500 Pt from their own property, salaries from jobs that cannot be lost except for legally proven cause, or from retirement, withdrawal or termination); as well as those who had an annual income of 20,000 Pt or were taxpayers with a minimum quota of 4,000 Pt in direct contributions at least two years in advance, as long as they were of the Spanish nobility, had been previously deputies, provincial deputies or mayors in provincial capitals or towns over 20,000 inhabitants, as well as those who had ever held the office of senator before the promulgation of the 1876 Constitution. ^{[36] [37]}

Results

Congress of Deputies

← Summary of the 19 May 1901 Congress of Deputies election results →

Parties and alliances		Popular vote		Seats
		Votes	%
	Liberal Party (PL)			246
	Liberal Conservative Party (PLC)			76
	Republican Coalition (CR)			15
	Gamacist Liberals (G)			15
	Liberal Reformist Party (PLR)			12
	Tetuanist Conservatives (T)			10
	National Union (UN)			6
	Traditionalist Communion (Carlist) (CT)			6
	Regionalist League (LR)			6
	Blasquist Republicans (RB)			2
	Integrist Party (PI)			2
	Independents (INDEP)			6
Total				402
Votes cast / turnout
Abstentions
Registered voters
Sources [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46]

Seats PL   61.19% PLC   18.91% CR   3.73% G   3.73% PLR   2.99% T   2.49% UN   1.49% CT   1.49% LR   1.49% RB   0.50% PI   0.50% INDEP   1.49%

Senate

← Summary of the 2 June 1901 Senate of Spain election results →

Parties and alliances		Seats
	Liberal Party (PL)	116
	Liberal Conservative Party (PLC)	38
	Tetuanist Conservatives (T)	7
	Republican Coalition (CR)	3
	Gamacist Liberals (G)	3
	Liberal Reformist Party (PLR)	2
	National Union (UN)	1
	Independents (INDEP)	1
	Archbishops (ARCH)	9
Total elective seats		180
Sources [a] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52]

Seats PL   64.44% PLC   21.11% T   3.89% CR   1.67% G   1.67% PLR   1.11% UN   0.56% INDEP   0.56% ARCH   5.00%

Maps

• 
  Election results by constituency (Congress).

Distribution by group

Summary of political group distribution in the 10th Restoration Cortes (1901–1903)

Group		Parties and alliances		C	S	Total
	PL		Liberal Party (PL)	245	113	362
			Basque Dynastics (Urquijist) (DV)	1	2
			Liberal–Republican Coalition (CLR)	0	1
	PLC		Liberal Conservative Party (PLC)	76	38	114
	CR		National Republican Party (PRN)	12	1	18
			Federal Republican Party (PRF)	2	0
			Centralist Republican Party (PRC)	1	1
			Liberal–Republican Coalition (CLR)	0	1
	G		Gamacist Liberals (G)	15	3	18
	T		Tetuanist Conservatives (T)	10	7	17
	PLR		Liberal Reformist Party (PLR)	12	2	14
	UN		National Union (UN)	6	0	7
			Liberal–Republican Coalition (CLR)	0	1
	CT		Traditionalist Communion (Carlist) (CT)	6	0	6
	LR		Regionalist League (LR)	6	0	6
	RB		Blasquist Republicans (RB)	2	0	2
	PI		Integrist Party (PI)	2	0	2
	INDEP		Independents (INDEP)	5	1	7
			Independent Catholics (CAT)	1	0
	ARCH		Archbishops (ARCH)	0	9	9
Total				402	180	582

Notes

1. Senate elections in the province of Valladolid were postponed, first to 28 July 1901, then to 26 October 1902. ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}
2. Results for FR (11 deputies and 1 senator) and PRF (2 deputies and 0 senators) in the 1899 election.

References

1. "Real decreto disponiendo que el domingo 28 del actual se proceda á la elección de tres Senadores por la provincia de Valladolid" (PDF). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish) (115). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: 260. 17 July 1901.
2. "Real decreto suspendiendo la elección de tres Senadores por la provincia de Valladolid" (PDF). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish) (115). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: 385. 26 July 1901.
3. "Real decreto disponiendo que el domingo 26 del actual se proceda á la elección parcial de tres Senadores por la provincia de Valladolid" (PDF). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish) (285). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: 137. 12 October 1902.
4. "Ecos políticos". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Correspondencia de España. 19 October 1902. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
5. "Elección de Senadores en Valladolid". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Año Político. 1 January 1903. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
6. Const. Esp. (1876) , tit. II, art. 18–19 & tit. V, art. 41.
7. Const. Esp. (1876) , tit. V, art. 38 & 42.
8. "El Senado en la historia constitucional española". Senate of Spain (in Spanish). Retrieved 26 December 2016.
9. L Dip (1890) , tit. I, art. 1–2.
10. García Muñoz 2002, pp. 106–107.
11. Carreras de Odriozola & Tafunell Sambola 2005, p. 1077.
12. Const. Esp. (1876) , tit. IV, art. 27–31.
13. L Dip (1890) , tit. III, art. 21–24.
14. L Dip (1890) , trans. prov. 1, applying L Dip (1871) , art. 1 and L Dip (1878) , tit. I, art. 2.
15. Rules modifying constituency boundaries:
    • Ley dividiendo la provincia de Guipúzcoa en distritos para la elección de Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law) (in Spanish). 23 June 1885. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
    • Ley dividiendo el distrito electoral de Tarrasa en dos, que se denominarán de Tarrasa y de Sabadell (PDF) (Law) (in Spanish). 18 January 1887. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
    • Ley fijando la división de la provincia de Álava en distritos electorales para Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law) (in Spanish). 10 July 1888. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
    • Leyes aprobando la división electoral de las provincias de León y Vizcaya (PDF) (Law) (in Spanish). 2 August 1895. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
    • Leyes aprobando la división electoral en las provincias de Sevilla y de Barcelona (PDF) (Law) (in Spanish). 5 July 1898. Retrieved 22 September 2022.
    • Ley mandando que en lo sucesivo sean cuatro los Diputados á Cortes que elegirá la circunscripción electoral de Cartagena (PDF) (Law) (in Spanish). 7 August 1899. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
16. Const. Esp. (1876) , tit. III, art. 20–26.
17. L Sen (1877) , ch. I, art. 1–2.
18. "Real decreto disponiendo el número de Senadores que han de elegir las provincias que se citan" (PDF). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish) (76). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: 1021. 16 March 1899.
19. Const. Esp. (1876) , tit. V, art. 32.
20. L Sen (1877) , ch. III, art. 11.
21. "Real decreto declarando disueltos el Congreso de los Diputados y la parte electiva del Senado, y disponiendo que las Cortes se reúnan en Madrid el 11 de Junio próximo" (PDF). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish) (115). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: 361. 25 April 1901.
22. Martorell Linares 1997, pp. 139–143.
23. Martínez Relanzón 2017, pp. 147–148.
24. "La Restauración borbónica. Implantación y afianzamiento de un nuevo sistema político (1874-1902)". TocaSociales.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 4 January 2025.
25. Maestre Rosa 1973, p. 213.
26. Herráiz García, C. "Silvela y la Vielleuze, Francisco (1845-1905)". MCN Biografías (in Spanish). Retrieved 11 October 2022.
27. De la Santa Cinta, Joaquín (13 September 2017). "Presidentes del Consejo de Ministros durante la Regencia de María Cristina de Habsburgo-Lorena: Francisco Silvela Le Vielleuze, Marcelo Azcárraga Palmero y Práxedes Mateo Sagasta". El Correo de Pozuelo (in Spanish). Retrieved 4 May 2023.
28. "Real decreto suspendiendo temporalmente las garantías constitucionales en la Península é islas adyacentes" (PDF). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish) (306). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: 421. 2 November 1900.
29. "Real decreto derogando el de 1.º de Noviembre último, por el cual se suspendieron las garantías constitucionales en la Península" (PDF). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish) (69). Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: 1061. 10 March 1901.
30. "La Electra de Galdós" (in Spanish). RTVE. 6 February 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2025.
31. "Anticlericalismo y pederastia" (in Spanish). Cadena SER. 29 October 2023. Retrieved 7 March 2025.
32. "25 de febrero de 1901: El anticlericalismo provoca la caída del gobierno en pleno; surge el Gabinete Electra" (in Spanish). Cadena SER. 25 February 2025. Retrieved 7 March 2025.
33. Fernández Sarasola 2009, p. 209.
34. Const. Esp. (1876) , tit. IV, art. 29.
35. L Dip (1890) , tit. III, art. 3–5.
36. Const. Esp. (1876) , tit. III, art. 22.
37. L Sen (1877) , ch. II, art. 4.
38. Armengol i Segú & Varela Ortega 2001, pp. 655–776.
39. "Elecciones generales". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Liberal. 21 May 1901. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
40. "Diputados futuros". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Día. 21 May 1901. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
41. "Las elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Correo Español. 21 May 1901. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
42. "Futuros diputados". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Siglo Futuro. 21 May 1901. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
43. "Las elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Globo. 21 May 1901. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
44. "El futuro Congreso". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Liberal. 22 May 1901. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
45. "Las elecciones". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Proteccionista. 22 May 1901. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
46. "Mayo de 1901. Día 19. Elecciones de diputados a Cortes". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Año Político. 1 January 1902. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
47. "Los nuevos senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). Heraldo de Madrid. 2 June 1901. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
48. "La elección de senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Imparcial. 2 June 1901. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
49. "Elección de senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Liberal. 3 June 1901. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
50. "Los senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Día. 3 June 1901. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
51. "Senadores electos". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). La Correspondencia de España. 3 June 1901. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
52. "Junio de 1901. Día 2. Elecciones de Senadores". National Library of Spain (in Spanish). El Año Político. 1 January 1902. Retrieved 11 October 2022.

Bibliography

• Ley mandando que los distritos para las elecciones de Diputados a Cortes sean los que se expresan en la división adjunta (PDF) (Law). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish). Vol. 27. 1 January 1871. ISSN   0212-1220 . Retrieved 21 August 2022.
• Constitución de la Monarquía Española (PDF) (Constitution of the Spanish Monarchy). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish). Vol. 184. 30 June 1876. ISSN   0212-1220 . Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Ley electoral de Senadores (PDF) (Law). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish). Vol. 41. 8 February 1877. ISSN   0212-1220 . Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Ley electoral de los Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish). Vol. 364. 28 December 1878. ISSN   0212-1220 . Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Ley electoral para Diputados a Cortes (PDF) (Law). Gaceta de Madrid (in Spanish). Vol. 180. 26 June 1890. ISSN   0212-1220 . Retrieved 19 August 2022.
• Fernández Almagro, Melchor (1943). "Las Cortes del siglo XIX y la práctica electoral". Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (9–10): 383–419. ISSN   0048-7694 . Retrieved 16 December 2020.
• Maestre Rosa, Julio (1973). "Francisco Silvela y su liberalismo regeneracionista". Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (187): 191–226. ISSN   0048-7694 . Retrieved 30 August 2022.
• Martorell Linares, Miguel Ángel (1997). "La crisis parlamentaria de 1913-1917. La quiebra del sistema de relaciones parlamentarias de la Restauración". Revista de Estudios Políticos (in Spanish) (96). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales: 137–161.
• Martínez Ruiz, Enrique; Maqueda Abreu, Consuelo; De Diego, Emilio (1999). Atlas histórico de España (in Spanish). Vol. 2. Bilbao: Ediciones KAL. pp. 109–120. ISBN   9788470903502.
• Armengol i Segú, Josep; Varela Ortega, José (2001). El poder de la influencia: geografía del caciquismo en España (1875-1923) (in Spanish). Madrid: Marcial Pons Historia. pp. 655–776. ISBN   9788425911521.
• García Muñoz, Montserrat (2002). "La documentación electoral y el fichero histórico de diputados". Revista General de Información y Documentación (in Spanish). 12 (1): 93–137. ISSN   1132-1873 . Retrieved 13 September 2020.
• Carreras de Odriozola, Albert; Tafunell Sambola, Xavier (2005) [1989]. Estadísticas históricas de España, siglos XIX-XX (PDF) (in Spanish). Vol. 1 (II ed.). Bilbao: Fundación BBVA. pp. 1072–1097. ISBN   84-96515-00-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015.
• Fernández Sarasola, Ignacio (2009). Los partidos políticos en el pensamiento español: de la Ilustración a nuestros días (in Spanish). Madrid: Marcial Pons Historia. ISBN   9788496467958.
• Martínez Relanzón, Alejandro (2017). "Political Modernization in Spain Between 1876 and 1923". Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio K. 24 (1). Madrid: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University: 145–154. doi: 10.17951/k.2017.24.1.145 . S2CID   159328027.