Autism and memory

Last updated

This relationship between autism and memory, specifically memory functions in relation to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), has been an ongoing topic of research. ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by social communication and interaction impairments, along with restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior. In this article, the word autism is used to refer to the whole range of conditions on the autism spectrum, which are not uncommon. [1]

Contents

Although memory difficulty is not part of the diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), it is a common symptom experienced by many autistic people. [2]

Overview

Some of the earliest references to the topic of autism and memory dated back to the 1960s and 1970s, when several studies appeared proposing that autism should be classified as amnesia. What is now diagnosed as autism was formerly diagnosed as developmental amnesia. [3] Although the views of autism as an amnesia of memory have now been rejected, there are still many studies done on the relationship between memory functions and autism. [4]

Long-term memory

There are two types of long-term memory; both of which have been studied in relation to autism. Declarative memory is memory that can be consciously recalled, such as facts and knowledge. [5] Declarative memory includes semantic and episodic memory. Semantic memory involves the recollection of facts, and episodic memory involves the recollection of previous experiences in life. [6] Studies on autistic people have shown impairments in their episodic memory but relative preservation of their semantic memory. [6] The brain regions that play a major role in declarative learning and memory are the hippocampus and regions of the medial temporal lobe. [6]

Long-term memory (LTM) is a complex and integral component of the human memory system, responsible for the storage and retention of information over extended periods, ranging from hours to a lifetime. It constitutes one of the three primary stages of memory, alongside sensory memory and short-term memory, and plays a pivotal role in shaping our cognitive experiences. [7]


Declarative memory and autism

Autobiographical memory

Autobiographical memory is an example of declarative memory. One aspect of autobiographical memory is the self-reference effect, which means that typically people have a stronger memory for information that is relevant to themselves. [8] It has been theorized that autistic people have diminished psychological self-knowledge but intact physical self-knowledge. As a result, these individuals show impaired autobiographical episodic memory and a reduced self-reference effect (which may each rely on psychological aspects of the self-concept), but do not show specific impairments in memory for their own rather than others' actions (which may rely on physical aspects of the self-concept). [8]

Explicit memory retrieval and recognition

Autistic people do not always conform to the Levels of Processing principle since they benefit from both deep and superficial recall cues.[ medical citation needed ]

Recognition in HFA (highly functioning autistic) individuals has been widely studied. Overall, these studies conclude that the majority of HFA individuals have intact recognition abilities. [3] Non-social stimulus recognition is often superior, or "robustly intact", [3] although there is some evidence suggesting that HFA individuals have difficulty with complex scenes and color combinations. For example, HFA individuals exhibit intact recognition of non-social stimuli such as written words, spoken sentences, pictures of common objects, and meaningless patterns or shapes. For HFA individuals, impaired recognition has been found in object-location and object-color recognition tests and in the recognition of words encoded self-referentially. [3] For more information regarding the recognition of social stimuli by autistic people, see the face perception page.

Contrary to the plethora of HFA recognition memory studies, the study of recognition for M-LFA individuals is considerably lacking. [3] The studies that do exist predominantly point to impaired recognition of pictures, words to name objects, and other non-social stimuli. Four delayed recognition studies reported recognition impairments for M-LFA participants. [3] Additionally, four of the seven primary studies of non-social stimuli recognition revealed significant impairment of non-social stimuli for M-LFA individuals. [3] The other three studies were less reliable because of their methodology. [3] Boucher, Lewis, and Collis gathered data supporting poor facial recognition, something widely observed for M-LFA individuals. [3]

Implicit/Non-declarative memory

Implicit memory is non-declarative memory that relies on past experiences to help recall things without actively thinking of them. Procedural memory, classical conditioning, and priming are all included in implicit memory; for example, procedural skills, such as riding a bike, become so natural over time that one does not have to explicitly think about them. The brain regions that process implicit memory are the basal ganglia and the cerebellum. Research suggests that HFA and M-LFA individuals show strong implicit memory functions. [3] HFA individuals display intact implicit memory for non-social stimuli, unimpaired classical conditioning, and performance on other implicit learning tasks. HFA individuals displayed normal perceptual and conceptual priming. Studies concerning implicit memory in M-LFA individuals are sparse, and further study is needed.

As mentioned above, there are very few reliable studies of non-declarative memory for M-LFA. However, there are some speculations. Some consider that the impaired motor skills evident in many cases of M-LFA may suggest impaired procedural learning. Other studies, including Walenski (2006) and Romero-Muguia (2008), [3] also think that ASD behavior is indicative of implicit memory function. For example, many autistic people have exceptional implicit perceptual processing abilities in mathematics, the arts and in musical improvisation. [3] Furthermore, there is speculation that because M-LFA individuals are often characterised by habit and routine, habit formation is likely unimpaired. [3] Behavioral treatments and therapies used with M-LFA individuals are usually very helpful, suggesting that implicit knowledge can be acquired and conditioning is intact. [3]

Working memory and autism

Working memory, a cognitive system with limited capacity [9] that retains and manipulates multiple pieces of transient information, has been found to be affected in individuals with ASD. Certain studies have suggested that deficits in working memory performance exist in individuals with ASD, especially when it comes to verbally mediated working memory tasks. [10] [11] One reason for this impairment is due to the working memory which is a part of the executive functions (EF), an umbrella term for cognitive processes that regulate, control, and manage other cognitive processes, [12] for instance planning and attention.

Typical classroom activity requires much polytropic processing of stimuli Polytropy.png
Typical classroom activity requires much polytropic processing of stimuli
A monotropic way of teaching can be greatly helpful for students with autism. Monotropic.png
A monotropic way of teaching can be greatly helpful for students with autism.
Monotropic and polytropic learning Monotropic and polytropic learning.png
Monotropic and polytropic learning

A majority of the research has found that individuals with autism perform poorly on measures of executive function. [13] A general decrease in working memory (WM) is one of the limitations, although some studies have shown that working memory is not impaired in autistic children relative to controls matched for IQ. [14] However, some evidence suggests that there may be minimal impairment in high-functioning autistic (HFA) individuals in that they have intact associative learning ability, verbal working memory, and recognition memory. [15] [16] In rare cases, there are even instances of individuals possessing extremely good memory in constricted domains which are typically characterised as savants. Bennetto, Pennington and Rogers also suggest that WM deficits and limited EF is likely compounded by the onset of autism where early development yields hindrances in social interaction which typically (i.e. without impairment) improves both WM and EF. However, due to limited ability in interpreting social gestures and an impaired ability to process such information in a holistic and comprehensive manner, individuals with autism are subject to diminishing and confounding instances of memory functions and performance. [13]

Global working memory

Beversdorf finds that autistic individuals are not as reliant on contextual information (i.e. comparing typically related schemas) to aid in memory consolidation, they are less likely to rely on semantically similar cues (ex. Doctor-Nurse vs. Doctor-Beach). Thus, an autistic individual would fare well on discriminating and recalling accurate items from false items. [17]

Bennetto, Pennington and Rogers investigated the degree of cognitive impairment in autistic individuals with an emphasis on illuminating the latency in executive functioning. Findings suggested a hindrance in temporal order, source, free recall and working memory. However, their participants did exhibit capable short and long-term memory, cued recall and the capacity to learn new material. In sum, they suggested that there is both a general deficit in global working memory and a specific impairment in social intelligence where the former is exacerbated by the latter and vice versa. [13]

Other evidence points towards unique mnemonic strategies used by autistic individuals wherein they rely less on semantic associative networks and are less constricted by conventional word-word associations (ex. Orange-Apple). This may be due to abnormalities in MTL regions. [18] Thus, autistic individuals may have the capacity for more abstract but robust associations. Firth addresses this with the term "weak Central Coherence", meaning a reduced tendency for processing information in context and integration of higher-level meaning. This may explain why autistic individuals have a heightened capacity for noticing seemingly disjointed details. [19] For example, in the Embedded Figures Test (EFT) autistic individuals exhibited a faster and heightened ability to locate the target because of their diminished reliance on global perception. [20] In a study conducted on autistic children, it was shown that neurocognition influences word learning in autistic children. The process of syntactic development requires a child to match co-occurrences of words or parts of words (morphemes) and their meanings. This process can depend on working memory. The limited short term verbal memory paired with working memory may be the reason of language delay in children with autism. According to the result of this experiment the group with autism was able to perform the part of the test with nonlinguistic cues which depended on working memory but failed to pass short-term memory and the linguistic part of it. This explains the delay of language in autistic children and neurocognition is an important contributor to it. [21]

Central executive or executive functioning

It is believed that a dysfunction in working memory significantly influences the symptoms associated with autism spectrum disorders. [22] In examining autism through the lens of Baddeley & Hitch's model of working memory, there have been conflicting results in the research. Some studies have shown that individuals that fall within the spectrum have impaired executive functioning, which means working memory does not function correctly. [23] However, other studies have failed to find an effect in autistic people with a high level of functioning. [24] Tests such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test have been administered to autistic individuals, and the lower scores have been interpreted as indicative of a poor ability to focus on relevant information and thus a deficit within the central executive aspect of working memory. [25] An aspect of ASD is that it might be present, to a certain extent, in first-degree relatives. One study found that siblings of autistic individuals have limited ability to focus and conceptualize categories using updated information. Given these results, it is reasonable to suggest that these so-called deficits in cognitive ability are of the cognitive endophenotypes (i.e., relatives) of ASD. [25]

Category integration

Given these findings, it would appear that autistic individuals have trouble categorizing. Studies have shown that category induction is in fact possible and can occur at the same cognitive level as non-autistic individuals. [26] Given that aspects of category formation such as discrimination and feature detection are enhanced among autistic individuals, it is viable to state that although autistic individuals require more trials and/or time to learn material and may employ different learning strategies than non-autistic individuals, once learned, the level of categorization displayed is on par with that of a non-autistic individual. [26]

The idea that autistic individuals learn differently than those without autism can account for the delay in their ability to categorize. However, once they begin categorizing they are at an average level of cognitive ability as compared to those without autism. [26] This, however, is only applicable to higher functioning individuals within the spectrum as those with lower IQ levels are notoriously difficult to test and measure. [27]

In part with a different style of learning, individuals within the spectrum have also been proposed[ by whom? ] to have a weak central coherence. This theory meshes well with the general traits of individuals within the spectrum. Again though, this is explained through different learning styles. As opposed to viewing a forest as a collection of trees, those with autism see one tree, and another tree, and another tree and thus it takes an immense amount of time to process complex tasks in comparison with non-autistic people. [27] Weak central coherence can be used to explain what is viewed as a working memory deficit in attention or inhibition, as autistic individuals possess an intense focus on single parts of a complex, multi-part concept and cannot inhibit this in order to withdraw focus and direct it on the whole rather than a singular aspect. Thus, this suggests that the decrement in working memory is partially inherited which is then exacerbated by further genetic complications leading to a diagnosis of autism.

Visual and spatial memory

Deficits in spatial working memory appear to be familial in people with autism, and probably even in their close relatives. [28] Replication of movements by others, a task that requires spatial awareness and memory capacities, can also be difficult for autistic children and adults. [29]

People with Asperger's Syndrome were found to have spatial working memory deficits compared with control subjects on the Executive-Golf Task, although these may be indicative of a more general deficit in non-verbal intelligence in people with ASD. [30] Despite these results, autistic children have been found to be superior to typically developing children in certain tasks, such as map learning and cued path recall regarding a navigated real-life labyrinth. [31] Steele et al. attempts to explain this discrepancy by advancing the theory that the performance of autistic people on spatial memory tasks degrades faster in the face of increasing task difficulty, when compared with normally developed individuals. [32] These results suggest that working memory is related with an individual's ability to solve problems, and that autism is a hindrance in this area. [32]

Autistic people appear to have a local bias for visual information processing, that is, a preference for processing local features (details, parts) rather than global features (the whole). [33] One explanation for this local bias is that people with autism do not have the normal global precedence when looking at objects and scenes. Alternatively, autism could bring about limitations in the complexity of information that can be manipulated in short-term visual memory during graphic planning. [33]

The difficulties that individuals with ASD often have in regards to facial recognition has prompted further questions. Some researches have shown that the fusiform gyrus in ASD individuals act differently from in non-ASD individuals which may explain the aforementioned troubles regarding facial recognition. [34]

Research by Baltruschat et al. has shown that improvement in spatial working memory for autistic individuals may be possible. [35] Adapting a behaviorist approach by using positive reinforcement could increase WM efficiency in young children with ASD. [35]

Auditory and phonological memory

The research on phonological working memory in autism is extensive and at times conflicting. Some research has found that, in comparison with spatial memory, verbal memory and inner speech use remain relatively spared, [36] [37] while other studies have found limitations on the use of inner speech by autistic people. [38] [39] Others have found a benefit to phonological processing in autism when compared with semantic processing, [24] and attribute the results to a similar developmental abnormality to that in savant syndrome. [40]

In particular, Whitehouse et al. [38] have found that autistic children, when compared with typically developing (TD) children of a similar mean verbal age and reading ability, performed better when asked to recall a set of pictures presented to them, but not as well when asked to recall a set of printed words presented interspersed with the pictures; a competing verbal task given to both sets of participants also worsened performance on control children more than it did on autistic children. They also reported that word length effects were greater for the control group. These results are contested by Williams, Happé, and Jarrold, who contend that it may be verbal IQ, rather than verbal ability, that is at issue, and Whitehouse et al.'s subjects were not matched on chronological age. Williams, Happé, and Jarrold [37] themselves found no difference between autistic children and controls on a serial recall task where phonological similarity effects, rather than word length effects, were used as an alternate measure of inner speech use.

Joseph et al. [39] found that a self-ordered pointing task in autistic children involving stimuli that could be remembered as words (e.g. shovel, cat) was impaired relative to comparison children, but the same task with abstract stimuli was not impaired in autistic children. In contrast, Williams et al. [36] found that autistic children scored significantly lower than TD children on spatial memory tests. Williams et al. not only experimented with spatial memory tasks, but verbal memory as well. They discovered that in an experimental group and a control group of TD individuals, that while differences were found in spatial memory ability, no significant difference was seen between the groups regarding verbal memory. [36] They ran their experiments with both children and adult participants. Autism is a developmental disorder, so it is possible that life experiences could alter the memory performance in adults who had grown up with autism. Williams et al. experimented with children separately to see if they had different results from their adult counterparts. They used a WRAML (Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning) test, a test specifically designed to test memory in children. [10] Test results were similar across all age groups, that significant differences between TD and autistic participants are found only in spatial memory, not verbal working memory. [10]

Gabig et al. [40] discovered that children with autism, regarding verbal working memory and story retelling, performed worse than a control group of TD children. In three separate tasks designed to test verbal working memory, the autistic children scored well below the expected levels for their age. While results do show lower scores for autistic children, there was also information that suggested lack of vocabulary contributed to the lower scores, rather than working memory itself. [40]

There is some evidence from an fMRI study that autistic individuals are more likely to use visual cues rather than verbal cues on some working memory tasks, based on the differentially high activation of right parietal regions over left parietal regions in an N-back working memory task with letters. [41]

Opposing results

Some data has shown that individuals with ASD may not have WM impairments and that this supposed impairment observed is a result of testing. Nakahachi et al. argue that the vagueness of many tests measuring WM levels in people with ASD is the cause. They found that people with ASD only performed worse on WM tests if the test itself could have interfered with the completion of the test. These findings show that the type of test and the way it is presented to individuals with ASD can strongly affect the results, therefore much caution should be taken in choosing the design of a study focusing on WM in people with ASD. [42]

Ozonoff et al. have found similar results in their studies on working memory in individuals with ASD. Their research showed no significant difference between individuals with ASD and those without ASD in tests designed to measure various aspects of working memory. [15] This supports the notion that Autism does not inhibit WM. Results from experiments that have shown lower WM facilities in ASD individuals may be due to the human interaction nature of these experiments as individuals with ASD exhibit low social functioning skills. [15] Experiments utilizing computer rather than human interaction remove this problem and may head more accurate findings. [15]

Further research by Griffith et al. also indicates that WM may not be impaired in those with autism. There may be some executive function impairments in these individuals, but not in working memory and rather in social and language skills, which can effect education early in life. [43] [44] [45] Other research conducted by Griffith et al. on young autistic individuals did not measure verbal working abilities, but nonetheless found no significant difference between the executive functions in autistic and non-autistic individuals. [43] Though there has been much research that alludes to low WM abilities in those with autism, these recent data weaken the argument that autistic individuals have little WM facilities.


Working memory refers to the cognitive system responsible for temporarily holding and manipulating information needed for various cognitive tasks. It plays a crucial role in activities such as problem-solving, language comprehension, and learning. In the context of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), individuals may exhibit differences in working memory, which can impact their cognitive abilities and daily functioning.

Research suggests that working memory deficits are common among individuals with autism. These deficits can manifest in difficulties with tasks that require information to be held in mind while simultaneously processing or manipulating other information. For example, individuals with autism may struggle with following multi-step instructions, organizing thoughts, or completing tasks that involve complex sequences.

Several studies have explored the relationship between working memory and autism, shedding light on the nuances of this cognitive aspect in the autism population. One such study by Barendse et al. (2013) investigated working memory performance in children with autism compared to typically developing children. The findings indicated that children with autism exhibited impairments in both verbal and visuospatial working memory tasks. [46] [47]

Physiological underpinnings

The physical underpinnings of the cause for differences in the memory of autistic people has been studied. Bachevalier suggests a major dysfunction in the brain of an autistic individual resides in the neural mechanisms of the structures in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and perhaps, more specifically the amygdaloid complex. [48] This may have implications in their ability to encode information because of the role the MTL and especially the hippocampal areas play in information processing [49] DeLong reinforces this by suggesting autism to affect hippocampal function. Because the hippocampus is pivotal in memory encoding and modulating memory consolidation, any impairment can drastically affect an autistic individual's ability to process (i.e. multi-modal) and retain information. [50] Sumiyoshi, Kawakubo, Suga, Sumiyoshi and Kasai have suggested that it is possible that the attenuated neural activities in parahippocampal regions might have something to do with the abnormal organization of information of individuals within the autistic spectrum. The left parahippocampal region (including the parahippocampal gyrus) has an implied role in sorting, relating, and sending information to the hippocampus and thus any abnormal activity or dysfunction within these regions might be accountable for the degree of effectiveness autistic individuals organize information. This is in keeping with other findings that suggest unconventional activity or lack of activity within the hippocampal regions which have a role in explaining some aspects of ASD. [25]

Further evidence suggests that there is abnormal circuitry in what Brothers calls the neural basis for social intelligence, or holistically interpreting people's expressions and intentions. [51] [52] The interaction between the amygdala, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and the superior temporal sulcus and gyrus (STG) enables one to process social information for personal interaction. In the case of autistic individuals there seems to be a limitation in these structures such that facial expressions, body language and speech expressions (ex. sarcasm) go consciously unnoticed, it is theorized that this could have something to do with the sagittal stratum, which is sometimes referred to as the "sarcasm center". [53] However, Frith and Hill suggest that through 'remediation' or training that attends to specific traits in expressions, social understanding can be partially improved. [54] The possibility of training in social understanding has given hope that there is a path that can be taken to reduce the social divide that is between children with autism and children who are neurotypical. [55]


Physiological underpinnings form the biological bedrock sustaining essential functions within the human body, crucial for overall health. These intricate mechanisms encompass molecular regulation, cellular signaling, and the dynamic interplay between organ systems. Understanding these foundations offers a unique perspective, revealing how disruptions in one system impact others, influencing health outcomes.

The personalized dimension adds complexity, acknowledging genetic variations, epigenetic factors, and environmental influences. Recognizing individual diversities enables the tailoring of interventions, ushering in a new era of precision medicine.

Additionally, studying the adaptive nature of physiological processes highlights the body's resilience in maintaining internal stability amid external challenges. This exploration provides insights for interventions that enhance resilience and optimize health outcomes.

In essence, delving into physiological underpinnings is a journey into the intricate tapestry of biological mechanisms, empowering researchers and healthcare professionals to deepen their understanding, promote health, prevent diseases, and embrace the era of personalized medicine. [56]

Memory strengths

Although many people who have been diagnosed with autism have some memory difficulties, there are some who excel with memory. Some individuals with HFA have been diagnosed with Savant syndrome. Those who are considered savants have abilities, usually related to memory, that are far above average, while also experiencing mental disabilities. Savants can also excel in a range of skills other than memory, including math, art, and music. [57]

Memory strength is a multifaceted cognitive function, with individual variations in key factors that contribute to its effectiveness. Here are some distinctive memory strengths:

Effective Encoding and Retrieval: Creating robust neural connections during information processing enhances later retrieval.

Associative Memory: Strong ability to link new information with existing knowledge, forming a network of interconnected memories.

Spatial Memory: Exceptional recall and navigation skills, beneficial in fields like architecture and navigation.

Emotional Memory: Vivid recollection of emotionally charged events, contributing to richer personal memories.

Visual Memory: Strong ability to recall images and details, useful in art, design, and face recognition.

Working Memory Capacity: Processing and remembering more information simultaneously, aiding complex problem-solving.

Long-Term Memory Consolidation: Efficient transfer of information from short-term to long-term memory for lasting retention.

Multisensory Integration: Excelling in incorporating information from various sensory modalities for robust memory formation.

Adaptability and Plasticity: High neuroplasticity facilitates easier learning of new information and adaptability to change.

Metacognition: Awareness of one's cognitive processes for effective monitoring and regulation of learning and memory.

These memory strengths are diverse, and a combination of factors contributes to an individual's overall memory abilities. For further reading, refer to articles by Tulving, Schacter, Baddeley, and Squire for in-depth exploration of memory. [58] [59] [60]

Further research

Few studies of implicit/non-declarative memory exist. Almost all of the M-LFA studies were conducted with school-aged children. [3] Recently[ when? ] a specific call has been issued for the investigation of total loss of declarative memory in significantly low-functioning, nonverbal autistic people. [3]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asperger syndrome</span> Neurodevelopmental diagnosis now categorized under Autism Spectrum Disorder

Asperger syndrome (AS), also known as Asperger's syndrome, formerly described a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significant difficulties in social interaction and nonverbal communication, along with restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities. The syndrome has been merged with other disorders into autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and is no longer considered a stand-alone diagnosis. It was considered milder than other diagnoses that were merged into ASD by relatively unimpaired spoken language and intelligence.

In psychology, theory of mind refers to the capacity to understand other people by ascribing mental states to them. A theory of mind includes the knowledge that others' beliefs, desires, intentions, emotions, and thoughts may be different from one's own. Possessing a functional theory of mind is crucial for success in everyday human social interactions. People utilise a theory of mind when analyzing, judging, and inferring others' behaviors. The discovery and development of theory of mind primarily came from studies done with animals and infants. Factors including drug and alcohol consumption, language development, cognitive delays, age, and culture can affect a person's capacity to display theory of mind. Having a theory of mind is similar to but not identical with having the capacity for empathy or sympathy.

Mixed receptive-expressive language disorder is a communication disorder in which both the receptive and expressive areas of communication may be affected in any degree, from mild to severe. Children with this disorder have difficulty understanding words and sentences. This impairment is classified by deficiencies in expressive and receptive language development that is not attributed to sensory deficits, nonverbal intellectual deficits, a neurological condition, environmental deprivation or psychiatric impairments. Research illustrates that 2% to 4% of five year olds have mixed receptive-expressive language disorder. This distinction is made when children have issues in expressive language skills, the production of language, and when children also have issues in receptive language skills, the understanding of language. Those with mixed receptive-language disorder have a normal left-right anatomical asymmetry of the planum temporale and parietale. This is attributed to a reduced left hemisphere functional specialization for language. Taken from a measure of cerebral blood flow (SPECT) in phonemic discrimination tasks, children with mixed receptive-expressive language disorder do not exhibit the expected predominant left hemisphere activation. Mixed receptive-expressive language disorder is also known as receptive-expressive language impairment (RELI) or receptive language disorder.

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders that begin in early childhood, persist throughout adulthood, and affect three crucial areas of development: communication, social interaction and restricted patterns of behavior. There are many conditions comorbid to autism spectrum disorders such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and epilepsy.

High-functioning autism (HFA) was historically an autism classification where a person exhibits no intellectual disability, but may experience difficulty in communication, emotion recognition, expression, and social interaction.

Nonverbal learning disability (NVLD) is a proposed category of neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by core deficits in visual-spatial processing and a significant discrepancy between verbal and nonverbal intelligence. A review of papers found that proposed diagnostic criteria were inconsistent. Proposed additional diagnostic criteria include intact verbal intelligence, and deficits in the following: visuoconstruction abilities, speech prosody, fine-motor coordination, mathematical reasoning, visuospatial memory and social skills. NVLD is not recognised by the DSM-5 and is not clinically distinct from learning disorder.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to autism:

The weak central coherence theory (WCC), also called the central coherence theory (CC), suggests that a specific perceptual-cognitive style, loosely described as a limited ability to understand context or to "see the big picture", underlies the central issue in autism and related autism spectrum disorder. Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired social interaction and communication, repetitive behaviours, restricted interests, and sensory processing issues.

In psychology and neuroscience, executive dysfunction, or executive function deficit, is a disruption to the efficacy of the executive functions, which is a group of cognitive processes that regulate, control, and manage other cognitive processes. Executive dysfunction can refer to both neurocognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms. It is implicated in numerous psychopathologies and mental disorders, as well as short-term and long-term changes in non-clinical executive control. Executive dysfunction is the mechanism underlying ADHD Paralysis, and in a broader context, it can encompass other cognitive difficulties like planning, organizing, initiating tasks and regulating emotions. It is a core characteristic of ADHD and can elucidate numerous other recognized symptoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Classic autism</span> Neurodevelopmental condition

Classic autism, also known as childhood autism, autistic disorder, (early) infantile autism, infantile psychosis, Kanner's autism,Kanner's syndrome, or (formerly) just autism, is a neurodevelopmental condition first described by Leo Kanner in 1943. It is characterized by atypical and impaired development in social interaction and communication as well as restricted, repetitive behaviors, activities, and interests. These symptoms first appear in early childhood and persist throughout life.

Several factors complicate the diagnosis of Asperger syndrome (AS), an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Like other ASD forms, Asperger syndrome is characterized by impairment in social interaction accompanied by restricted and repetitive interests and behavior; it differs from the other ASDs by having no general delay in language or cognitive development. Problems in diagnosis include disagreement among diagnostic criteria, the controversy over the distinction between AS and other ASD forms or even whether AS exists as a separate syndrome, and over- and under-diagnosis for non-technical reasons. As with other ASD forms, early diagnosis is important, and differential diagnosis must consider several other conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autism spectrum</span> Neurodevelopmental disorder

Autism, formally called autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or autism spectrum condition (ASC), is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by impaired social communication and restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior. Other common signs include difficulty with social interaction, verbal and nonverbal communication, along with perseverative interests, stereotypic body movements, rigid routines, and hyper- or hyporeactivity to sensory input. Autism is clinically regarded as a spectrum disorder, meaning that it can manifest very differently in each person. For example, some are nonspeaking, while others have proficient spoken language. Because of this, there is wide variation in the support needs of people across the autism spectrum.

Functional disconnection is the disintegrated function in the brain in the absence of anatomical damage, in distinction to physical disconnection of the cerebral hemispheres by surgical resection, trauma or lesion. Applications have included alexia without agraphia dyslexia, persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state as well as autistic spectrum disorders. Functional disconnection itself is not a medically recognized condition. It is a theoretical concept used to facilitate research into the causes and symptoms within recognized conditions.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) refers to a variety of conditions typically identified by challenges with social skills, communication, speech, and repetitive sensory-motor behaviors. The 11th International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), released in January 2021, characterizes ASD by the associated deficits in the ability to initiate and sustain two-way social communication and restricted or repetitive behavior unusual for the individual's age or situation. Although linked with early childhood, the symptoms can appear later as well. Symptoms can be detected before the age of two and experienced practitioners can give a reliable diagnosis by that age. However, official diagnosis may not occur until much older, even well into adulthood. There is a large degree of variation in how much support a person with ASD needs in day-to-day life. This can be classified by a further diagnosis of ASD level 1, level 2, or level 3. Of these, ASD level 3 describes people requiring very substantial support and who experience more severe symptoms. ASD-related deficits in nonverbal and verbal social skills can result in impediments in personal, family, social, educational, and occupational situations. This disorder tends to have a strong correlation with genetics along with other factors. More research is identifying ways in which epigenetics is linked to autism. Epigenetics generally refers to the ways in which chromatin structure is altered to affect gene expression. Mechanisms such as cytosine regulation and post-translational modifications of histones. Of the 215 genes contributing, to some extent in ASD, 42 have been found to be involved in epigenetic modification of gene expression. Some examples of ASD signs are specific or repeated behaviors, enhanced sensitivity to materials, being upset by changes in routine, appearing to show reduced interest in others, avoiding eye contact and limitations in social situations, as well as verbal communication. When social interaction becomes more important, some whose condition might have been overlooked suffer social and other exclusion and are more likely to have coexisting mental and physical conditions. Long-term problems include difficulties in daily living such as managing schedules, hypersensitivities, initiating and sustaining relationships, and maintaining jobs.

Memory is one of the brain's most critical functions. It has the infinite ability to store information about events and experiences that occur constantly. Experiences shape the way memories form, so major stressors on socioeconomic status can impact memory development. Socioeconomic status (SES) is a measurement of social standing based on income, education, and other factors. Socioeconomic status can differ cross-culturally, but is also commonly seen within cultures themselves. It influences all spectrums of a child's life, including cognitive development, which is in a crucial and malleable state during early stages of childhood. In Canada, most children grow up in agreeable circumstances, however an unfortunate 8.1% are raised in households that fall into the category of low socioeconomic status. These children are at risk for many disadvantages in life, including deficits in memory processing, as well as problems in language development.

Sex and gender differences in autism exist regarding prevalence, presentation, and diagnosis.

Autism is characterized by the early onset of impairments in reciprocal social interaction and communication and restricted repetitive behaviors or interests. One of the many hypotheses explaining the psychopathology of autism, the deficit in joint attention hypothesis is prominent in explaining the disorder's social and communicative deficits. Nonverbal autism is a subset of autism spectrum where the person does not learn how to speak. One study has shown that 64% of autistic children who are nonverbal at age 5, are still nonverbal 10 years later.

The mechanisms of autism are the molecular and cellular processes believed to cause or contribute to the symptoms of autism. Multiple processes are hypothesized to explain different autism spectrum features. These hypotheses include defects in synapse structure and function, reduced synaptic plasticity, disrupted neural circuit function, gut–brain axis dyshomeostasis, neuroinflammation, and altered brain structure or connectivity.

Social (pragmatic) communication disorder (SPCD), also known as pragmatic language impairment (PLI), is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significant difficulties in the social use of verbal and nonverbal communication. Individuals with SPCD struggle to effectively engage in social interactions, interpret social cues, and use language appropriately in social contexts. This disorder can have a profound impact on an individual's ability to establish and maintain relationships, navigate social situations, and participate in academic and professional settings. Although SPCD shares similarities with other communication disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), it is recognized as a distinct diagnostic category with its own set of diagnostic criteria and features.

The diagnosis of autism is based on a person's reported and directly observed behavior. There are no known biomarkers for autism spectrum conditions that allow for a conclusive diagnosis.

References

  1. Caronna EB, Milunsky JM, Tager-Flusberg H (2008). "Autism spectrum disorders: clinical and research frontiers". Arch Dis Child. 93 (6): 518–23. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.115337. PMID   18305076. S2CID   18761374.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. Habib, Abdullah; Harris, Leanne; Pollick, Frank; Melville, Craig (2019-04-30). "A meta-analysis of working memory in individuals with autism spectrum disorders". PLOS ONE. 14 (4): e0216198. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1416198H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216198 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   6490940 . PMID   31039192.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Boucher J, Mayes A, Bigham S (May 2012). "Memory in autistic spectrum disorder" (PDF). Psychological Bulletin (Review). 138 (3): 458–96. doi:10.1037/a0026869. PMID   22409507.
  4. Williams DL, Goldstein G, Minshew NJ (August 2006). "Neuropsychologic functioning in children with autism: further evidence for disordered complex information-processing". Child Neuropsychology (Research). 12 (4–5): 279–98. doi:10.1080/09297040600681190. PMC   1803025 . PMID   16911973.
  5. Ullman MT (2004). "Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model". Cognition (Research). 92 (1–2): 231–70. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008. PMID   15037131. S2CID   14611894.
  6. 1 2 3 Goh S, Peterson BS (March 2012). "Imaging evidence for disturbances in multiple learning and memory systems in persons with autism spectrum disorders". Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology (Review). 54 (3): 208–13. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04153.x. PMID   22269006. S2CID   35999361.
  7. Bliss, T. V., & Collingridge, G. L. (1993). "A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus" in Nature explores the synaptic basis of memory formation.
  8. 1 2 Lind SE (September 2010). "Memory and the self in autism: A review and theoretical framework" (PDF). Autism (Review). 14 (5): 430–56. doi:10.1177/1362361309358700. PMID   20671017. S2CID   12452530.
  9. Baddeley, A (2000). "The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4 (11): 417–423. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 . PMID   11058819. S2CID   14333234.
  10. 1 2 3 Boucher, Jill (2008). Memory in Autism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 132–135.
  11. Williams, D. L.; Goldstein, G.; Minshew, N. J. (2006). "Neuropsychologic functioning in children with autism: further evidence for disordered complex information-processing". Child Neuropsychology. 12 (4–5): 279–298. doi:10.1080/09297040600681190. PMC   1803025 . PMID   16911973.
  12. Elliott, R (2003). "Executive functions and their disorders". British Medical Bulletin. 65 (1): 49–59. doi: 10.1093/bmb/65.1.49 . PMID   12697616.
  13. 1 2 3 Bennetto, Loisa; Pennington, Bruce F.; Rogers, Sally J. (August 1996). "Intact and impaired memory functions in autism". Child Development. 67 (4): 1816–1835. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01830.x. PMID   8890510.
  14. Russell, James; Jarrold, Christopher; Henry, Lucy (1 September 1996). "Working Memory in Children with Autism and with Moderate Learning Difficulties". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 37 (6): 673–686. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01459.x. PMID   8894948.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Ozonoff, Sally; Strayer, David L. (1 January 2001). "Further Evidence of Intact Working Memory in Autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 31 (3): 257–263. doi:10.1023/A:1010794902139. PMID   11518480. S2CID   1272710.
  16. Williams, Diane L.; Goldstein, Gerald; Minshew, Nancy J. (1 January 2006). "The profile of memory function in children with autism". Neuropsychology. 20 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.20.1.21. PMC   1847594 . PMID   16460219.
  17. Beversdorf, David; Smith, Brian W.; Crucian, Gregory P.; et al. (July 18, 2000). "Increased discrimination of 'false memories' in autism spectrum disorder". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97 (15): 8734–7. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.8734B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8734 . PMC   27017 . PMID   10900024.
  18. Salmond, C. H.; Ashburner, J.; Connelly, A.; Friston, K. J.; Gadian, D. G.; Vargha-Khadem, F. (1 August 2005). "The role of the medial temporal lobe in autistic spectrum disorders". European Journal of Neuroscience. 22 (3): 764–772. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04217.x. PMID   16101758. S2CID   23813651.
  19. Happé, Francesca (June 1999). "Autism: cognitive deficit or cognitive style?" (PDF). Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 3 (6): 216–222. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01318-2. PMID   10354574. S2CID   11125022.
  20. Jolliffe, Therese; Baron‐Cohen, Simon (1997). "Are People with Autism and Asperger Syndrome Faster Than Normal on the Embedded Figures Test?". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 38 (5): 527–534. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01539.x. ISSN   1469-7610. PMID   9255696.
  21. http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&id=A84B64CC-C257-DC9C-2FF5-E1D2CE68D435&resultID=20&page=1&dbTab=pi (broken link)
  22. Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. B., Liu, L. L., Cui, J. F., Wang, J., Shum, D. H., ... & Chan, R. C. (2017). A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychology review, 27(1), 46-61. doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9336-y
  23. Sumiyoshi, C; Kawakubo, Y; Suga, M; Sumiyoshi, T; Kasai, K (2011). "Impaired ability to organize information in individuals with autism spectrum disorders and their siblings". Neuroscience Research. 69 (3): 252–257. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2010.11.007. PMID   21129422. S2CID   41842427.
  24. 1 2 Mottron, L; Morasse, K; Belleville, S (2001). "A study of memory functioning in individuals with autism". Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry. 42 (2): 253–260. doi:10.1017/S0021963001006722. PMID   11280421.
  25. 1 2 3 Sumiyoshi, C; Kawakubo, Y; Suga, M; Sumiyoshi, T; Kasai, K (2011). "Impaired ability to organize information in individuals with autism spectrum disorders and their siblings". Neuroscience Research. 69 (3): 252–257. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2010.11.007. PMID   21129422. S2CID   41842427.
  26. 1 2 3 Soulières, I; Mottron, L; Giguère, G; Larochelle, S (2011). "Category induction in autism: Slower, perhaps different, but certainly possible". The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 64 (2): 311–327. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.492994. PMID   20623440. S2CID   23978792.
  27. 1 2 Vladusich, T; Olufemi, O; Kim, DS; Tager-Flusberg, H; Grossberg, S (October 2010). "Prototypical category learning in high-functioning autism". Autism Research. 3 (5): 226–236. doi:10.1002/aur.148. PMID   20717947. S2CID   8817736.
  28. Kozcat, DL; Rogers, SJ; Pennington, BF; Ross, RG (2002). "Eye movement abnormality suggestive of a spatial working memory deficit is present in parents of autistic probands". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 32 (6): 513–518. doi:10.1023/A:1021246712459. PMID   12553588. S2CID   45132588.
  29. Happé, Francesca (1995). Autism: an introduction to psychological theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 36. ISBN   978-0-674-05312-0.
  30. Morris, R; Rowe, A.; Fox, N.; Feigenbaum, J.D.; Miotto, E.C.; Howlin, P. (1 October 1999). "Spatial Working Memory in Asperger's Syndrome and in Patients with Focal Frontal and Temporal Lobe Lesions". Brain and Cognition. 41 (1): 9–26. doi:10.1006/brcg.1999.1093. PMID   10536083. S2CID   9466666.
  31. Caron, M; Mottron, L; Rainville, C; Chouinard, S (1 January 2004). "Do high functioning persons with autism present superior spatial abilities?". Neuropsychologia. 42 (4): 467–481. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.015. PMID   14728920. S2CID   14533710.
  32. 1 2 Steele, Shelly D.; Minshew, Nancy J.; Luna, Beatriz; Sweeney, John A. (April 2007). "Spatial Working Memory Deficits in Autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 37 (4): 605–612. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0202-2. PMID   16909311. S2CID   19882957.
  33. 1 2 Mottron, Laurent; Belleville, Sylvie; Menard, Edith (1 July 1999). "Local Bias in Autistic Subjects as Evidenced by Graphic Tasks: Perceptual Hierarchization or Working Memory Deficit?". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 40 (5): 743–755. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00490. PMID   10433408.
  34. Koshino, H.; Kana, R. K.; Keller, T. A.; Cherkassky, V. L.; Minshew, N. J.; Just, M. A. (8 May 2007). "fMRI Investigation of Working Memory for Faces in Autism: Visual Coding and Underconnectivity with Frontal Areas". Cerebral Cortex. 18 (2): 289–300. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm054. PMC   4500154 . PMID   17517680.
  35. 1 2 Baltruschat, Lisa; Hasselhorn, Marcus; Tarbox, Jonathan; Dixon, Dennis R.; Najdowski, Adel C.; Mullins, Ryan D.; Gould, Evelyn R. (1 April 2011). "Further analysis of the effects of positive reinforcement on working memory in children with autism". Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 5 (2): 855–863. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2010.09.015. S2CID   6868342.
  36. 1 2 3 Williams, Diane L.; Goldstein, Gerald; Carpenter, Patricia A.; Minshew, Nancy J. (December 2005). "Verbal and Spatial Working Memory in Autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 35 (6): 747–756. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0021-x. PMID   16267641. S2CID   36471857.
  37. 1 2 Williams, David; Happé, Francesca; Jarrold, Christopher (1 January 2008). "Intact inner speech use in autism spectrum disorder: evidence from a short-term memory task" (PDF). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 49 (1): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01836.x. PMID   18181880.
  38. 1 2 Whitehouse, Andrew J.O.; Maybery, Murray T.; Durkin, Kevin (26 April 2006). "Inner speech impairments in autism". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 47 (8): 857–865. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01624.x. PMID   16899000.
  39. 1 2 JOSEPH, R; STEELE, S; MEYER, E; TAGERFLUSBERG, H (1 January 2005). "Self-ordered pointing in children with autism: failure to use verbal mediation in the service of working memory?". Neuropsychologia. 43 (10): 1400–1411. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.010. PMID   15989932. S2CID   10924334.
  40. 1 2 3 Gabig, Cheryl. (October 2008). "Verbal working memory and story retelling in school-age children with autism". Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 39 (4): 498–511. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0023). PMID   18820091.
  41. KOSHINO, H; CARPENTER, P; MINSHEW, N; CHERKASSKY, V; KELLER, T; JUST, M (1 February 2005). "Functional connectivity in an fMRI working memory task in high-functioning autism". NeuroImage. 24 (3): 810–821. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.028. PMID   15652316. S2CID   16077740.
  42. Nakahachi, T; Iwase, M; Takeda, M (June 2006). "Discrepancy of performance among working memory-related tasks in autism spectrum disorders was caused by task characteristics, apart from working memory, which could interfere with task execution". Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 60 (3): 312–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01507.x . PMID   16732747.
  43. 1 2 Griffith, Elizabeth; Bruce Pennington; Elizabeth Wehner; Sally Rogers (1999). "Executive Functions in Young Children with Autism". Child Development. 70 (4): 817–832. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00059. PMID   10446722.
  44. Robertson, K; Chamberlain, B; Kasari, C (April 2003). "General education teachers' relationships with included students with autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 33 (2): 123–30. doi:10.1023/a:1022979108096. PMID   12757351. S2CID   29072921.
  45. Cartwright, Kelly B. (January 2012). "Insights From Cognitive Neuroscience: The Importance of Executive Function for Early Reading Development and Education". Early Education & Development. 23 (1): 24–36. doi:10.1080/10409289.2011.615025. S2CID   43891999.
  46. Kenworthy, L., Yerys, B. E., Anthony, L. G., & Wallace, G. L. (2008). Understanding executive control in autism spectrum disorders in the lab and in the real world. Neuropsychology Review, 18(4), 320-338.
  47. Barendse, E. M., Hendriks, M. P., Jansen, J. F., Backes, W. H., Hofman, P. A., Thoonen, G., ... & Aldenkamp, A. P. (2013). Working memory deficits in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: neuropsychological and neuroimaging correlates. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5(1), 14.
  48. Bachevalier, Jocelyne (1 June 1994). "Medial temporal lobe structures and autism: A review of clinical and experimental findings". Neuropsychologia. 32 (6): 627–648. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)90025-6. PMID   8084420. S2CID   24829915.
  49. Dickerson, Bradford C; Eichenbaum, Howard (23 September 2009). "The Episodic Memory System: Neurocircuitry and Disorders". Neuropsychopharmacology. 35 (1): 86–104. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.126. PMC   2882963 . PMID   19776728.
  50. DeLong, GR (Spring 1992). "Autism, amnesia, hippocampus, and learning". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 16 (1): 63–70. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(05)80052-1. PMID   1553107. S2CID   20144368.
  51. Brothers, L.; Ring, B; Kling, A (21 December 1990). "Response of neurons in the macaque amygdala to complex social stimuli". Behavioural Brain Research. 41 (3): 199–213. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(90)90108-Q. PMID   2288672. S2CID   4023773.
  52. Baron-Cohen, S; Ring, H.A.; Bullmore, E.T.; Wheelwright, S.; Ashwin, C.; Williams, S.C.R. (May 2000). "The amygdala theory of autism". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 24 (3): 355–364. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00011-7. PMID   10781695. S2CID   7455984.
  53. Geggel, L. (2015, April 8). Why You Get the Joke: Brain Sarcasm Center Found. Live Science. https://www.livescience.com/50412-sarcasm-brain-sagittal-stratum.html
  54. Hill, E. L.; Frith, U. (28 February 2003). "Understanding autism: insights from mind and brain". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 358 (1430): 281–289. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1209. PMC   1693123 . PMID   12639326.
  55. White, S. W., Keonig, K., & Scahill, L. (2007). Social skills development in children with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the intervention research. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 37(10), 1858–1868.
  56. Chen, L. et al. (2024). "Endocrine System Dynamics in Chronic Stress: Implications for Health and Disease." Psychoneuroendocrinology, 45(3), 321-335.
  57. Treffert, Darold A. (2009). "The savant syndrome: an extraordinary condition. A synopsis: past, present, future". Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 364 (1522): 1351–1357. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0326. PMC   2677584 . PMID   19528017.
  58. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 26(1), 1-12.
  59. Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In Memory systems (pp. 1-38). MIT Press.
  60. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.