Critical autism studies (CAS) is an interdisciplinary research field within autism studies led by autistic people. [1] [2] [3] This field is related to both disability studies and neurodiversity studies. [4] [5] [6]
CAS as a discipline is led by autistic academics, and many autistic people engage with the discipline in nonacademic spaces. [3] [4] [6] The point of this field's existence is to give power to the voices of autistic people in autism research, [4] but there is critique of the field for failing to represent the depth of how intersectionality affects autistic people. [6] The field of critical autism studies was created for the purpose of creating a better life for autistic individuals [4] [3] through the challenging of the medical model of disability, ableism against autistic individuals, and harmful stereotypes about autism. [4] Many CAS scholars are from fields in the social sciences and humanities. [4]
The primary components of this field of research are how autism as a label is impacted by power relations between autistic and non-autistic scholars, challenges against the medical model of disability and deficit narratives in relation to autism, and how autism as an identity is highly individualized. [5] [3] [6] Two other components that have been proposed but have not been widely accepted within CAS are whether autism diagnoses are valid given the way that autism as a label has been created by non-autistic people and what the value of an autism diagnosis is. [3] [6]
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link)