Part of a series on |
Human enhancement |
---|
![]() |
Biohappiness, or bio-happiness, is the elevation of well-being in humans and other animals through biological methods, including germline engineering through screening embryos with genes associated with a high level of happiness, or the use of drugs intended to raise baseline levels of happiness. The object is to facilitate the achievement of a state of "better than well". [1]
Proponents of biohappiness include the transhumanist philosopher David Pearce, whose goal is to end the suffering of all sentient beings [2] and the Canadian ethicist Mark Alan Walker. Walker coined the term "bio-happiness" to describe the idea of directly manipulating the biological roots of happiness in order to increase it. [3] He sought to defend it on the grounds that happiness ought to be of interest to a wide range of moral theorists; and that hyperthymia, a state of high baseline happiness, is associated with better outcomes in health and human achievement. [4] [5]
A significant danger of bio happiness is the ethical problems of altering the natural human emotional state through technological methods. Molding organic brain chemistry or genetic structures to achieve happiness would raise concerns about the authenticity of the human body/experience. [3] [6] It is argued that tampering with the state of the human mind and creating an eternal happiness would disrupt the natural range of emotions that a human will experience. Sadness, grief and anger are all crucial for emotional growth, empathy and understanding. Additionally, the long term effects of bio happiness are not yet understood, meaning later down the line, issues could arise. Loss of individuality, emotional depth and the risk of being dependent on an external source for happiness are all concerns regarding this. [3]