Bull Canyon Formation | |
---|---|
Stratigraphic range: | |
Type | Geological formation |
Unit of | Dockum Group |
Underlies | Redonda Formation |
Overlies | Trujillo Formation |
Thickness | 110 metres (360 ft) |
Lithology | |
Primary | mudstone |
Other | sandstone, siltstone, conglomerate |
Location | |
Region | New Mexico, Texas |
Country | United States |
Type section | |
Named for | Bull Canyon (Guadalupe County, New Mexico) |
Named by | Lucas & Hunt, 1998 |
The Bull Canyon Formation is a geological formation of Late Triassic (Norian) age in eastern New Mexico and the Texas Panhandle. It is one of several formations encompassed by the Dockum Group.
The Bull Canyon Formation preserves reptile fossils of the Revueltian "faunachron", and it is generally considered time-equivalent to the upper Cooper Canyon Formation, which crops out further south in west-central Texas.
Triassic rocks in the Tucumcari Basin of east-central New Mexico have been prospected for fossils since the 1890s. The bulk of early fossil collecting in the formation was done by University of Michigan paleontologist E.C. Case (starting in the 1910s) and Yale paleontologist Joseph T. Gregory (starting in the 1940s). For much of the 20th century, all Late Triassic strata in New Mexico was assumed to belong to the Chinle Formation. [1] Kelley (1972) informally labelled a unit of fine-grained sediments in the upper part of the Triassic strata as the "upper shale member" of the Chinle Formation. [2] [3]
Lucas & Hunt (1989) introduced the name "Bull Canyon Formation" for these exposures, referring to an area of badlands near Luciano Mesa in eastern Guadalupe County, New Mexico. At the Bull Canyon badlands (the type locality), the formation preserves 95 metres (312 ft) of sediment, about 80% of which is dark reddish mudstone. Yellowish-grey or greyish-red fine quartzarenite sandstone makes up about 16% of the layers, with rare siltstone and siltstone-pebble conglomerate. [4] Of special note is a thick brownish litharenite sandstone bed, the Saladito Point Bed, which is comparable to some sandstone beds in Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona. The Bull Canyon Formation reaches a maximum thickness of 110 metres (360 ft) in eastern New Mexico. [5] It lies above the Trujillo Formation, which has a much greater proportion of sandstone beds. In New Mexico, the Bull Canyon Formation is overlain by a similar but generally finer-grained geological unit, the Redonda Formation. [4] [6] [5] [7]
For much of the 1990s and 2000s, the Bull Canyon Formation was conflated with another geological unit in the Dockum Group: the Cooper Canyon Formation. The Cooper Canyon Formation, which is most well-exposed in Garza County, Texas, was initially named as the "Cooper Member" by Chatterjee (1986), [8] before being raised to formation status by Lehman et al. (1992). [9] Both formations are thick geological units with a large proportion of reddish mudstone. Lehman et al. (1992) and Lehman (1994) [10] argued that the Bull Canyon Formation should be synonymized with the Cooper Canyon Formation. These authors suggested that the Boren Ranch Sandstone, which underlies the Cooper Canyon Formation in Garza County, is equivalent to the sandstone-rich Trujillo Formation in New Mexico and the Texas Panhandle. If this is the case, then the "Cooper Member" (and consequently Cooper Canyon Formation) would take priority as the first formal name applied to the mudstone-rich strata above the Trujillo Formation. [10]
Lucas and his colleagues pushed back, arguing that the "Cooper Member" was an invalid name: Chatterjee (1986)'s original stratotype was too thin to be comparable with other areas, and "Cooper" was preoccupied by Cooper Marl of South Carolina. They favored the Bull Canyon Formation as the first valid formal name for the mudstone-rich strata. [6] Carpenter (1997) reviewed both perspectives, noting various cases of noncompliance with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Carpenter eventually sided with Lehman's perspective. [11] Despite the disagreement between these two schools of thought, most studies agreed that the two formations, as generally perceived, were probably one-to-one equivalents. [3] [4] [9] [6] [10] [11]
More extensive geological mapping in Texas by Martz (2008) disagreed with the idea that the Bull Canyon and Cooper Canyon formations were exact equivalents, nullifying the debate over priority. Martz notes that the sandstone beds of the Trujillo Formation are not equivalent to the Boren Ranch Sandstone, but rather to the middle part of the Cooper Canyon Formation. This would indicate that the lower-middle part of the Cooper Canyon Formation is older than the Bull Canyon Formation, and that only the upper Cooper Canyon Formation is equivalent. [7]
Color key
| Notes Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; |
Several microvertebrate assemblages are known from the Bull Canyon Formation. [12] [13] [14] [15]
Temnospondyls of the Bull Canyon Formation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus / Taxon | Species | Locality | Material | Notes | Images |
Apachesaurus | A. gregorii | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek, Barranca Creek, Mesa Redonda, [1] | Skull, intercentra, other possible fragments [16] [17] | A small metoposaurid which appears to be better suited for terrestrial life than other metoposaurids. [16] [17] Apachesaurus may simply represent juveniles of larger metoposaurids native to the American Southwest. [18] | |
Metoposauridae indet. | Skull fragments [17] | Large metoposaurid fragments of uncertain affinities, most common in conglomerates in the lower part of the formation. Possibly reworked from older strata. [17] |
Synapsids of the Bull Canyon Formation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus / Taxon | Species | Locality | Material | Notes | Images |
Pseudotriconodon [19] | P. chatterjeei [19] | Bull Canyon [19] | Teeth | A "dromatheriid" cynodont. [19] |
Avemetatarsalians of the Bull Canyon Formation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus / Taxon | Species | Locality | Material | Notes | Images |
Gojirasaurus [11] | G. quayi [11] | Revuelto Creek [11] | Partial skeleton | A very large "coelophysoid" theropod dinosaur. [20] [11] One of the largest known Triassic theropods, though its validity as a distinct species is uncertain. Some (though not all) of its fossil material may belong to Shuvosaurus, and other remains resemble Coelophysis , albeit much larger and more robust. [21] [22] | |
Neotheropoda indet. | Bull Canyon | Partial skeleton and fibula | Specimens NMMNH P-4569 ("Comanchesaurus kuesi" or "Herrerasaurid B" [23] ) and NMMNH P-4563, belonging to large early neotheropods similar to Gojirasaurus. [21] [22] [24] | ||
Saurischia indet. | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek, Barranca Creek | Teeth, [12] partial skeletons including vertebrae and hindlimb material | Various fragmentary fossils in the Bull Canyon Formation have been referred to specific saurischian dinosaur taxa (Coelophysis, [12] Chindesaurus , [16] herrerasaurids, [25] [23] [17] "prosauropods", [16] etc.). These referrals are very tenuous and often contradictory. [21] Some purported Bull Canyon dinosaur fossils, such as specimen NMMNH P-17375 ("Cryptoraptor lockleyi") are difficult to distinguish from Shuvosaurus. [21] |
Phytosaurs of the Bull Canyon Formation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus / Taxon | Species | Locality | Material | Notes | Images |
Machaeroprosopus | M. andersoni | "near Santa Rosa" (Bull Canyon?) [17] | At least one skull, possibly other fossils | Sometimes known as Pseudopalatus andersoni. [17] A 2013 study established that all phytosaur species previously classified as "Pseudopalatus" should rather be called Machaeroprosopus. [26] The holotype of M. andersoni was probably collected from the Bull Canyon Formation. A few other phytosaur fossils may also belong to the species, though detailed investigation has not been conducted. One putative specimen preserves stomach content of Vancleavea vertebrae and smaller phytosaur hip fragments. [17] | |
M. mccauleyi | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek, Barranca Creek, Cosner Ranch, [1] | Skulls and postcrania | A brachyrostral (thick-snouted) mystriosuchin phytosaur. American phytosaurs are prone to significant taxonomic controversy, and this holds true for fossils from the Bull Canyon Formation. At various times, "Rutiodon" gregorii , [27] [20] "Nicrosaurus" gregorii, [28] "Arribasuchus" buceros, [16] Pseudopalatus andersoni [17] and Pseudopalatus mccauleyi [29] have all been proposed as names for the most common Bull Canyon phytosaur species, a brachyrostral form. Many phytosaur fossils from the Bull Canyon Formation are indeterminate to the genus or species level. [16] [17] | ||
M. pristinus | Bull Canyon | Skulls and postcrania | An uncommon dolichorostral (slender-snouted) mystriosuchin phytosaur, previously known as Pseudopalatus pristinus. [25] [16] [17] One specimen preserves stomach content of "Apachesaurus" vertebrae. [17] |
Pseudosuchians of the Bull Canyon Formation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus / Taxon | Species | Locality | Material | Notes | Images |
Aetosaurus | A. arcuatus | L-501 [30] | Osteoderms [30] | A small and rare aetosaurine aetosaur. [30] The referral of these fossils to Aetosaurus is questionable, as they show few diagnostic features. [31] | |
"Sphenosuchidae" indet. | Barranca Creek | Partial skeleton and skull fragments [32] | An unnamed "sphenosuchian"-grade crocodylomorph similar to Hesperosuchus . [16] [32] Indeterminate "sphenosuchian" fragments are common throughout the formation. [17] | ||
Paratypothorax | P. sp. | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek, Cosner Ranch [1] | Osteoderms [33] [16] [1] | A rare paratypothoracin aetosaur. | |
Postosuchus | P. kirkpatricki | Barranca Creek [16] | Hip, vertebrae, and hindlimbs [16] [17] | A large rauisuchid. Indeterminate rauisuchid fossils are common throughout the formation, including teeth, vertebrae, and other postcranial fragments. [16] [17] | |
Revueltosaurus [34] | R. callenderi [34] | Revuelto Creek | Teeth, [34] partial skeleton [35] | A small armored aetosauriform, [36] previously misidentified as an ornithischian dinosaur based on its similar teeth. [34] [16] [23] [17] | |
Rioarribasuchus | R. chamaensis | Revuelto Creek [16] | Paramedian osteoderms and isolated spikes | A paratypothoracin aetosaur. Also known as Heliocanthus, [37] and previously considered a species of Desmatosuchus . [27] [20] [16] [17] [38] | |
Shuvosaurus | S. inexpectatus | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek, Barranca Creek | Premaxilla fragment, [20] postcrania [16] [17] | A common shuvosaurid poposauroid with a bipedal stance and a toothless, beaked skull. Fossils of this species are frequently confused with those of dinosaurs [21] and Poposaurus . [20] [16] [25] [17] Many postcranial fossils were previously described as a new genus, "Chatterjeea", [16] until it was recognized that Shuvosaurus and "Chatterjeea" were synonyms. [17] [21] | |
Typothorax | T. coccinarum | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek, Barranca Creek | Complete skeletons, osteoderms | A large typothoracine aetosaur. One of the most abundant reptiles in the formation, known from multiple complete skeletons. [39] [16] [17] [40] |
Other reptiles of the Bull Canyon Formation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus / Taxon | Species | Locality | Material | Notes | Images |
Chinlechelys | C. tenertesta | Revuelto Creek | Partial skeleton | An early turtle, [41] [42] sometimes regarded as a species of Proganochelys . [43] | |
Lucianosaurus [44] | L. wildi [44] | Luciano Mesa | Teeth | Teeth of a herbivorous archosauriform of uncertain affinities, [35] [21] initially described as a "fabrosaurid" ornithischian. [44] [17] | |
Otischalkia | O. elderae | Revuelto Creek [45] | Humerus fragments [45] | A robust archosauromorph. Initially regarded as a late-surviving rhynchosaur, [45] but more likely an indeterminate malerisaurine azendohsaurid. [46] | |
Squamata? indet. | Revuelto Creek, Luciano Mesa | Jaw fragments | Pleurodont jaw fragments, presumably from lepidosaurs or kuehneosaurids. [17] | ||
Vancleavea [16] | V. campi | Vertebrae, [16] osteoderms, limb material [17] | An armored semiaquatic archosauriform. Some vertebrae are preserved as gut contents in a phytosaur skeleton. [17] |
Scales, coprolites, and other fragmentary fish fossils are common in the Bull Canyon and Revuelto Creek areas. Most of these likely belong to actinopterygians. [17] [15]
Fish of the Bull Canyon Formation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus / Taxon | Species | Locality | Material | Notes | Images |
Arganodontidae? indet. | Revuelto Creek | Skull fragments | Indeterminate lungfish similar to Arganodus . [17] | ||
"Colobodontidae"? indet. | Revuelto Creek | Tooth plates | "Phyllodont" fish teeth, traditionally referred to colobodontid or perleidid perleidiforms, [17] but more likely belonging to other unrelated fish such as coelacanths. [14] | ||
Quayia [47] | Q. zideki [47] | Revuelto Creek [17] | Skull material, basisphenoid fragments, scales [47] | A coelacanth, almost as large as living Latimeria . | |
Redfieldiidae indet. | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek | Isolated scales and scaly body fragments [25] [17] | A redfieldiiform. | ||
Reticulodus [48] | R. synergus [48] | Bull Canyon, [48] Mesa Redonda [49] | Teeth | A hybodont shark with durophagous (crushing) dentition. [48] [49] | |
Semionotus | S. cf. S. brauni | Bull Canyon, Revuelto Creek | Scaly body fragments [25] [17] | A robust semionotiform. | |
Tanaocrossus? | T.? kalliokoski | Skull and skeletal material, [25] [17] including three-dimensional fossils | A slender "palaeonisciform". |
The Bull Canyon Formation preserves a rather diverse fauna of freshwater mollusks. Unionid bivalves (freshwater mussels) are locally abundant, primarily Unio (U. arizonensis and at least six unnamed species) and Antediplodon (A. dockumensis and one unnamed species). A hydrobiid snail, Triasamnicola pilsbryi , is also common. [50] [17] Ostracods and coiled Spirorbis -like structures (probably tiny snail shells) round out the invertebrate body fossils known from the formation. [1] [17]
Trackways of both vertebrates and invertebrates are known to occur in the Bull Canyon Formation. Narrow Acripes tracks were probably emplaced by notostracan crustaceans (tadpole shrimp) crawling in shallow temporary pools. A vertebrate ichnotaxon, Barrancapus cresapi , was named for vertebrate footprints found near Barranca Creek. [1] [51]
A few plant fossils have been found in the formation, including charophyte green algae, bennettitalean leaves ( Zamites powellii ), large horsetail stems ( Neocalamites sp.), and foliage of an enigmatic shrubby plant ( Sanmiguelia sp.). Root casts and fossil wood are not uncommon, sometimes showing signs of fungus damage. [1] [17]
Gojirasaurus is a genus of "coelophysoid" theropod dinosaur from the Late Triassic of New Mexico. It is named after the giant monster movie character Godzilla, and contains a single species, Gojirasaurus quayi.
Aetosaurs are heavily armored reptiles belonging to the extinct order Aetosauria. They were medium- to large-sized omnivorous or herbivorous pseudosuchians, part of the branch of archosaurs more closely related to crocodilians than to birds and other dinosaurs. All known aetosaurs are restricted to the Late Triassic, and in some strata from this time they are among the most abundant fossil vertebrates. They have small heads, upturned snouts, erect limbs, and a body ornamented with four rows of plate-like osteoderms. Aetosaur fossil remains are known from Europe, North and South America, parts of Africa, and India. Since their armoured plates are often preserved and are abundant in certain localities, aetosaurs serve as important Late Triassic tetrapod index fossils. Many aetosaurs had wide geographic ranges, but their stratigraphic ranges were relatively short. Therefore, the presence of particular aetosaurs can accurately date a site in which they are found.
Revueltosaurus is an extinct genus of suchian pseudosuchian from Late Triassic deposits of New Mexico, Arizona and North Carolina, United States. Many specimens, mostly teeth, have been assigned to Revueltosaurus over the years. Currently, three species are included in this genus, all of which were originally thought to represent monospecific genera of basal ornithischian dinosaurs. Revueltosaurus was about 1 meter long.
Shuvosaurus is a genus of beaked, bipedal poposauroid pseudosuchian from the Late Triassic of western Texas. Despite superficially resembling a theropod dinosaur, especially the ostrich-like ornithomimids, it is instead more closely related to living crocodilians than to dinosaurs. Shuvosaurus is known by the type and only species S. inexpectatus, and is closely related to the very similar Effigia within the clade Shuvosauridae. Shuvosaurus was originally described from a restored skull and very few fragmentary postcranial bones as a probable ornithomimosaur, or at least a very ornithomimosaur-like early theropod. The true pseudosuchian affinities of Shuvosaurus were only recognised after the discovery of Effigia linked the skull of Shuvosaurus with similar poposauroid skeletal remains found in the same quarry.
The Chinle Formation is an Upper Triassic continental geological formation of fluvial, lacustrine, and palustrine to eolian deposits spread across the U.S. states of Nevada, Utah, northern Arizona, western New Mexico, and western Colorado. In New Mexico, it is often raised to the status of a geological group, the Chinle Group. Some authors have controversially considered the Chinle to be synonymous to the Dockum Group of eastern Colorado and New Mexico, western Texas, the Oklahoma panhandle, and southwestern Kansas. The Chinle Formation is part of the Colorado Plateau, Basin and Range, and the southern section of the Interior Plains. A probable separate depositional basin within the Chinle is found in northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah. The southern portion of the Chinle reaches a maximum thickness of a little over 520 meters (1,710 ft). Typically, the Chinle rests unconformably on the Moenkopi Formation.
Spinosuchus is an extinct genus of trilophosaurid allokotosaur from the Late Triassic of Texas, southern United States. It has been assigned to a variety of groups over its history, from coelophysid dinosaur to pseudosuchian to uncertain theropod dinosaur and to Proterosuchidae. This uncertainty is not unusual, given that it was only known from a poorly preserved, wall-mounted, partial vertebral column of an animal that lived in a time of diverse, poorly known reptile groups. However, newly collected material and recent phylogenetic studies of early archosauromorphs suggest that it represents an advanced trilophosaurid very closely related to Trilophosaurus.
The Dockum is a Late Triassic geologic group found primarily on the Llano Estacado of western Texas and eastern New Mexico with minor exposures in southwestern Kansas, eastern Colorado, and Oklahoma panhandle. The Dockum reaches a maximum thickness of slightly over 650 m but is usually much thinner. The Dockum rests on an unconformity over the Anisian aged Anton Chico Formation.
Redondasaurus is an extinct genus or subgenus of phytosaur from the Late Triassic of the southwestern United States. It was named by Hunt & Lucas in 1993, and contains two species, R. gregorii and R. bermani. It is the youngest and most evolutionarily-advanced of the phytosaurs.
Typothorax is an extinct genus of typothoracine aetosaur that lived in the Late Triassic. Its remains have been found in North America. Two species are known: T. coccinarum, the type species, and T. antiquum.
The Cooper Canyon Formation is a geological formation of Norian age in Texas. It is one of several formations encompassed by the Dockum Group.
Lucasuchus is an extinct genus of aetosaur. Fossils have been found from the Bull Canyon Formation of the Dockum Group outcropping in the Revuelto Creek locality in Quay County, New Mexico. All specimens date back to the Norian stage of the Late Triassic. The genus was named in 1995 after the American paleontologist Spencer G. Lucas.
Machaeroprosopus is an extinct genus of mystriosuchin leptosuchomorph phytosaur from the Late Triassic of the southwestern United States. M. validus, once thought to be the type species of Machaeroprosopus, was named in 1916 on the basis of three complete skulls from Chinle Formation, Arizona. The skulls have been lost since the 1950s, and a line drawing in the original 1916 description is the only visual record of the specimen. Another species, M. andersoni, was named in 1922 from New Mexico, and the species M. adamanensis, M. gregorii, M. lithodendrorum, M. tenuis, and M. zunii were named in 1930. Most species have been reassigned to the genera Smilosuchus, Rutiodon, or Phytosaurus. Until recently, M. validus was considered to be the only species that has not been reassigned. Thus, Machaeroprosopus was considered to be a nomen dubium or "doubtful name" because of the lack of diagnostic specimens that can support its distinction from other phytosaur genera. However, a taxonomic revision of Machaeroprosopus, conducted by Parker et al. in 2013, revealed that UW 3807, the holotype of M. validus, is not the holotype of Machaeroprosopus, while the species Machaeroprosopus buceros, Machaeroprosopus being a replacement name, with a fixed type species, for Metarhinus, is the combinatio nova of the type species of the genu: Belodon buceros. Therefore, the name Pseudopalatus must be considered a junior synonym of Machaeroprosopus, and all species of the former must be reassigned to the latter. This revised taxonomy was already accepted in several studies, including Stocker and Butler (2013). Stocker and Butler (2013) also treated M. andersoni as a valid species, and not a junior synonym of Machaeroprosopus buceros as was previously suggested by Long and Murry (1995).
Paratypothorax is an extinct genus of aetosaur, known from a single species, Paratypothorax andressorum. It was a broadly distributed member of the group found in Germany, North America, and possibly parts of Gondwana. The best specimens come from Germany, though for more than a century they were mistakenly considered phytosaur armor. Paratypothorax was a large and wide-bodied typothoracine aetosaur, as well as the namesake of the tribe Paratypothoracisini.
Tecovasuchus is an extinct genus of aetosaur. It is known primarily from osteoderms found from the Tecovas Formation in Texas, which is Late Triassic in age, dating back to the lower Norian. Material is also known from several other localities of the Chinle Group in New Mexico and Arizona, such as older Carnian outcrops and younger Rhaetian outcrops. Specimens of Tecovasuchus have been collected from the Tecovas Formation, the Bluewater Creek Formation, and the Los Esteros Member of the Santa Rosa Formation.
The Garita Creek Formation is a geologic formation in New Mexico that contains vertebrate fossils characteristic of the Carnian Age of the late Triassic.
The Colorado City Formation is a Late Triassic geologic formation in the Dockum Group of Texas, United States. It has previously been known as the Iatan Member, Colorado City Member or 'Pre-Tecovas Horizon'.
The Trujillo Formation is a geologic formation in Texas and New Mexico. It preserves fossils dating back to the upper Triassic period. It is also known as the Trujillo Sandstone.
Apachesuchus is an extinct genus of aetosaur from the Late Triassic of New Mexico. It is only known from several paramedian osteoderms discovered in Quay County in eastern New Mexico. This area belongs to the late Norian-age Quay Member of the Redonda Formation. Unique among aetosaurs, its osteoderms are nearly completely smooth, without strong pits or grooves. The left dorsal paramedian has a relatively high width-to-length ration, suggesting that Apachesuchus is a wide-bodied aetosaur within the clade Typothoracinae.
The Chama Basin is a geologic structural basin located in northern New Mexico. The basin closely corresponds to the drainage basin of the Rio Chama and is located between the eastern margin of the San Juan Basin and the western margin of the Rio Grande Rift. Exposed in the basin is a thick and nearly level section of sedimentary rock of Permian to Cretaceous age, with some younger overlying volcanic rock. The basin has an area of about 3,144 square miles (8,140 km2).