Digital diplomacy

Last updated
Coordinator of Bureau of International Information Programs Macon Phillips (left), responds to a question during a panel discussion -- Digital Diplomacy: Making Foreign Policy Less Foreign -- with Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Doug Frantz (center), and Assistant Secretary for Education and Cultural Affairs Evan Ryan, who joined via digital video conference, on February 18, 2014. Moderated by Emily Parker, author of Now I Know Who My Comrades Are: Voices From the Internet Underground and digital diplomacy advisor and senior fellow at the New America Foundation, the panel discussion is part of Social Media Week New York City. IIP Coordinator Phillips Responds to a Question (12621374484).jpg
Coordinator of Bureau of International Information Programs Macon Phillips (left), responds to a question during a panel discussion -- Digital Diplomacy: Making Foreign Policy Less Foreign -- with Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Doug Frantz (center), and Assistant Secretary for Education and Cultural Affairs Evan Ryan, who joined via digital video conference, on February 18, 2014. Moderated by Emily Parker, author of Now I Know Who My Comrades Are: Voices From the Internet Underground and digital diplomacy advisor and senior fellow at the New America Foundation, the panel discussion is part of Social Media Week New York City.

Digital diplomacy, also referred to as Digiplomacy and eDiplomacy (see below), has been defined as the use of the Internet and new information communication technologies to help achieve diplomatic objectives. [1] However, other definitions have also been proposed. [2] [3] [4] The definition focuses on the interplay between internet and diplomacy, ranging from Internet driven-changes in the environment in which diplomacy is conducted to the emergence of new topics on diplomatic agendas such as cybersecurity, privacy and more, along with the use of internet tools to practice diplomacy. [5]

Contents

Platform-specific terms that have also evolved in this diplomacy category include Facebook diplomacy, Twitter diplomacy, [6] [7] and Google diplomacy. [8]

Overview

The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office defines digital diplomacy as 'solving foreign policy problems using the internet', [9] a narrower definition that excludes internal electronic collaboration tools and mobile phone and tablet-based diplomacy. The US State Department uses the term 21st Century Statecraft [10] The Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development [11] calls it Open Policy. [12]

Digital diplomacy can be practiced by state agencies such as Foreign Ministries, embassies and consulates, individual diplomats such as ambassadors or ambassadors-at-large, and non-state actors such as civil society and human rights groups. [13]

History

The first foreign ministry to establish a dedicated ediplomacy unit was the US State Department, which created the Taskforce on eDiplomacy in 2002. This Taskforce has since been renamed the Office of eDiplomacy and has approximately 80 staff members, about half of which are dedicated to ediplomacy-related work. In April 2022 the US State Department set up a new Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (CDP). Although there is no generally accepted definition, "in this report, we consider 'cyber diplomacy' to be efforts that support U.S. interests in cyberspace internationally, led by the Department of State." [14] Indeed, the new CDP bureau brings together the many disparate initiatives set up under the Obama Administration under the hyphenated term United States cyber-diplomacy encompassing Hillary Clinton's 21st century statecraft.

Other foreign ministries have also begun to embrace ediplomacy. The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office began to develop a digital diplomacy strategy in 2008 [15] and now has an Office of Digital Diplomacy [16] that is involved in a range of ediplomacy activities. [1] Sweden has also been active in promotion of digital diplomacy, especially through the online communication strategy of its foreign minister Carl Bildt who soon became 'best connected Twitter leader'. [17]

In July 2012, global public relations and communications firm Burson-Marsteller studied the use of Twitter by heads of state and government, referred to as Twitter diplomacy. The study on Twiplomacy [18] found that there were 264 Twitter accounts of heads of state and government and their institutions in 125 countries worldwide and that only 30 leader's tweet personally. Since then, the attention on digital diplomacy as a tool of public diplomacy has only increased. In 2013, USC Center on Public Diplomacy has named 'Facebook recognizing Kosovo as a country', [19] as one of the top moments in public diplomacy for 2013. [20] [21] [22] [23]

In 2014, the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs hosted the Stockholm Initiative for Digital Diplomacy conference. The initiative evolved into informal online campaigns under the umbrella #DiplomacyUnited, coordinating the work of a dozen embassies in Washington, D.C. [24]

According to the Twiplomacy Study 2020, published in July 2020, 98 percent of UN member states had a diplomatic presence on Twitter. [25] Only Laos, North Korea, Sao Tome and Principe and Turkmenistan lacked representation on the social network. [25]

Facebook diplomacy

Facebook diplomacy is a user created hybrid of public diplomacy and citizen diplomacy as applied in the Facebook social networking platform. After some earlier informal use the term Facebook diplomacy was described at a New York conference on social networking and technology in December 2008.

During the December conference in New York, the United States Undersecretary of Public Diplomacy, James Glassman said, "New technology gives the United States and other free nations a significant advantage over terrorists." In his presentation at New York's Columbia University Law School, he went on to illustrate how Facebook diplomacy and on-line activism created success through the use of Facebook groups and the use of the platform to create activism and cause global awareness relative to issues in Colombia against the infamous FARC rebels. [26]

Facebook ambassador may refer to Facebook Garage Ambassadors who are dedicated to the technical aspect of Facebook development. Research 'Facebook Developer Garage' and 'Garage-In-A-Box'. [27]

Opportunities in digital diplomacy

The rise of social media as a tool in diplomacy has given way for states to strike up two-way or “dialogic" communication with other diplomatic actors and their foreign publics, compared to the one-way nature of traditional public diplomacy. [28] While traditional diplomacy occurs offline in relative privacy, online diplomacy has allowed a multitude of actors to discuss foreign policy-making, increasing the impact of public opinion on the foreign policy agenda. [28]

This method of diplomacy provides additional avenues for other actors to engage in co-creation with influential people and organizations on multilateral diplomatic campaigns. [29] An example of this would be the 2012-2014 Campaign to End Sexual Violence in Conflict launched by then British foreign secretary William Hague, which used a multi-channel digital and offline approach to engage UN organizations as well as states. [29] A video featuring co-created content by Angelina Jolie, a UN Special Envoy, supporting the campaign managed to attract 15,000 views, compared to the foreign secretary’s similar video, which only attracted 400 views. [29]

This ability for states to listen to their audiences' perceptions of their foreign policy is considered another potential benefit of digital diplomacy. [30] [31] It can provide a new means for states who have severed formal diplomatic ties to collect information about each other’s foreign policy positions. [30] For example, despite the states' strained diplomatic relationship, the U.S. State Department follows the Iranian president on Twitter. [30]

Access to social media as a diplomatic channel has also changed the relative influence of diplomatic actors from states thought to possess little hard power – or power achieved through material resources strength – amongst other diplomatic actors. [30] [32] A study done by Ilan Manor and Elad Segev in 2020 measured the social media mobility of ministries of foreign affairs and UN missions to New York, finding that states with less hard power could use social media to become “supernodes” in online diplomatic networks. [30] This is also referred to this as the “theory of networked diplomacy”. [30]

Challenges in digital diplomacy

Though states have managed to achieve diplomatic prominence online through their use of Twitter and other online channels, these new diplomatic channels do not come without risks. Messages and images shared on social media platforms, particularly Twitter, have already given rise to diplomatic crises.

In 2018, Global Affairs Canada tweeted a statement calling on Saudi Arabia to release imprisoned human rights activists. In response, Saudi Arabia cut diplomatic and trade ties with Canada, declaring the country’s ambassador persona non grata and recalling Saudi Arabia's ambassador to Canada. [32]

The incident escalated when a pro-government Twitter account later tweeted an image of an Air Canada plane flying in the direction of Toronto’s CN Tower, with the text, “He who interferes with what doesn’t concern him finds what doesn’t please him.” The image incited criticism from many on social media due to perceived parallels between the image and the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. [32]

Digital platforms have also enabled the spread of disinformation used to undermine states’ international and domestic stability, such as the interference of the Russian government in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Department of State</span> Executive department of the U.S. federal government

The United States Department of State (DOS), or simply the State Department, is an executive department of the U.S. federal government responsible for the country's foreign policy and relations. Equivalent to the ministry of foreign affairs of other nations, its primary duties are advising the U.S. president on international relations, administering diplomatic missions, negotiating international treaties and agreements, protecting citizens abroad and representing the U.S. at the United Nations. The department is headquartered in the Harry S Truman Building, a few blocks from the White House, in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington, D.C.; "Foggy Bottom" is thus sometimes used as a metonym.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diplomat</span> Person appointed by a state to conduct diplomacy with another state or international organisations

A diplomat is a person appointed by a state, intergovernmental, or nongovernmental institution to conduct diplomacy with one or more other states or international organizations.

In international relations, public diplomacy broadly speaking, is any of the various government-sponsored efforts aimed at communicating directly with foreign publics to establish a dialogue designed to inform and influence with the aim of building support for the state's strategic objectives. These also include propaganda. As the international order has changed over the twentieth century, so has the practice of public diplomacy. Its practitioners use a variety of instruments and methods ranging from personal contact and media interviews to the internet and educational exchanges.

The public diplomacy of Israel is Israel's efforts to communicate directly with citizens of other nations to inform and influence their perceptions, with the aim of garnering support or tolerance for the Israeli government's strategic objectives. Historically, these efforts have evolved from being called "propaganda" by early Zionists, with Theodor Herzl advocating such activities in 1899, to the more contemporary Hebrew term "hasbara" introduced by Nahum Sokolow, which translates roughly to "explaining". This communicative strategy seeks to justify actions and is considered reactive and event-driven.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Danny Ayalon</span> Israeli diplomat, columnist and politician

Daniel "Danny" Ayalon is an Israeli diplomat, columnist and politician. He served as Deputy Foreign Minister and as a member of the Knesset. He was the Israeli Ambassador to the United States from 2002 until 2006. Previously, he worked as senior foreign policy advisor to Prime Ministers Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak, and Benjamin Netanyahu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nathaniel Fick</span> American diplomat, executive, author, and military officer (born 1977)

Nathaniel C. Fick is an American diplomat, technology executive, author, and former United States Marine Corps officer. He was the CEO of cybersecurity software company Endgame, Inc., then worked for Elastic NV after it acquired Endgame. He was an Operating Partner at Bessemer Venture Partners. In 2022, he was selected to lead the U.S. State Department's Bureau for Cyberspace and Digital Policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawaiian Kingdom–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

Hawaiian Kingdom–United States relations refers to the historical relationship between the independent Hawaiian Kingdom and the United States. Relations included several treaties and exchanges of trade and diplomatic representatives from 1820 to 1893.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delegation of the European Union to the United States</span> European Union delegation

The Delegation of the European Union to the United States represents the European Union in the United States, working in coordination with the diplomatic and consular missions of all 27 EU Member States. It is located at 2175 K Street, N.W., in the West End neighborhood of Washington, D.C.

Guerrilla diplomacy is a method of diplomacy that is identified as an alternative approach to the established common frameworks of international relations, being primarily articulated by Daryl Copeland in response to the foreign policy outcomes of the War on Terror. In a sense, the responses to the major events of the late 20th century and the early 21st century which has brought major changes to the International Order is identified as in need of a new paradigm of diplomatic thinking in order to adapt to the needs of modern diplomacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diplomacy</span> Practice of conducting negotiations between representatives of groups or states

Diplomacy comprises spoken or written communication by representatives of state, intergovernmental, or non-governmental institutions intended to influence events in the international system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Full spectrum diplomacy</span> Integration of governmental and public diplomacy

Full spectrum diplomacy is a combination of traditional, government-to-government diplomacy with the many components of public diplomacy as well as the integration of these two functions with other instruments of statecraft. The term was coined by John Lenczowski, founder and president of The Institute of World Politics in Washington, D.C. in his book Full Spectrum Diplomacy and Grand Strategy: Reforming the Structure and Culture of U.S. Foreign Policy which was released in May, 2011.

USAbilAraby is the name used by the US Department of State's Arabic Media Hub for its Twitter account and YouTube channel. The name, "USAbilAraby," means "USA in Arabic." As this suggests, the Twitter account tweets messages from the US government, primarily in Arabic and typed in Arabic script. Similarly, the YouTube channel broadcasts official messages in Arabic. USAbilAraby's first tweet appeared on February 9, 2011; its first video was posted on May 4, 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States cyber-diplomacy</span>

Cyber-diplomacy is the evolution of public diplomacy to include and use the new platforms of communication in the 21st century. As explained by Jan Melissen in The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, cyber-diplomacy “links the impact of innovations in communication and information technology to diplomacy.” Cyber-diplomacy is also known as or is part of public diplomacy 2.0, Digital diplomacy, EDiplomacy, and virtual diplomacy. Cyber-diplomacy has as its underpinnings that, “it recognizes that new communication technologies offer new opportunities to interact with a wider public by adopting a network approach and making the most of an increasingly multicentric global, interdependent system.”

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twitter diplomacy</span> Use of Twitter/X by diplomats

Twitter diplomacy, or Twiplomacy, is a form of digital diplomacy, refers to the practice of conducting public diplomacy using the social media platform Twitter by heads of state and diplomats, as well as leaders of intergovernmental organizations (IGOs).

Mark McDowell is a Canadian diplomat and was the first resident Ambassador of Canada to the Union of the Republic of Myanmar. He is considered an Asia hand and is a specialist in the fields of public diplomacy and digital diplomacy. He has been characterized as "an unconventional diplomat" and a champion of LGBTIQ rights.

Sergey Nalobin is a Russian diplomat, a Deputy Director of the Information and Press Department of the Russian MFA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elad Ratson</span> Israeli diplomat

Elad Ratson is an Israeli Diplomat and a Digital Diplomacy expert, Head of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs Data Diplomacy R&D Unit. Ratson's previous Diplomatic positions include Deputy Chief of Mission of the Embassy of Israel in Côte d'Ivoire, Director of Public Relations of the Embassy of Israel in France and Director of Research & Development at the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs headquarters in Jerusalem. Ratson is most known for his work in the field of Digital diplomacy, the use of Social Media in Politics, the effects of Social media on the practice of Diplomacy and the Agenda-setting effect of social media on public opinion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wolf warrior diplomacy</span> 21st-century Chinese diplomatic tactic

Wolf warrior diplomacy is a confrontational form of public diplomacy adopted by Chinese diplomats in the late 2010s. The term was coined by Western media based on the Chinese action film franchise Wolf Warrior (2015) and its 2017 sequel. This approach is in contrast to the prior diplomatic practices that emphasized the use of cooperative rhetoric and the avoidance of controversy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embassy of the United States, Singapore</span> Diplomatic mission of the United States of America in Singapore

The Embassy of the United States of America, Singapore is the diplomatic mission of the United States to Singapore. It is one of the largest American embassies in the Asia-Pacific region and the focal point for events relating to the United States held in Singapore.

Data diplomacy can be defined in two different ways: use of data as a means and tool to conduct national diplomacy, or the use of diplomatic actions and skills of various stakeholders to enable and facilitate data access, understanding, and use. Data can help and influence many aspects of the diplomatic process, such as information gathering, negotiations, consular services, humanitarian response and foreign policy development. The second kind of data diplomacy challenges traditional models of diplomacy and can be conducted without tracks and diplomats. Drivers of change in diplomacy are also emerging from industry, academia and directly from the public.

References

  1. 1 2 Fergus Hanson (November 2012). "A Digital DFAT: Joining the 21st century". Lowy Institute. Archived from the original on 2012-03-22.
  2. ↑ "Digital Diplomacy - DiploFoundation". diplomacy.edu. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
  3. ↑ Definition of eDiplomacy by Alec J. Ross - HUBFORUM 2010. YouTube. 1 October 2010. Archived from the original on 2021-12-19.
  4. ↑ Tutt. A. (2013), E-Diplomacy Capacities within the EU-27: Small States and Social Media (e-book access for free). 23 May 2014. Retrieved 2015-09-17.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  5. ↑ Kurbalija, Jovan (October 1, 2017). "Chapter 8: The Impact of the Internet and ICT on Contemporary Diplomacy". In Kerr, Pauline (ed.). Diplomacy in a Globalizing World. Oxford University Press. pp. 151–169. ISBN   9780190647988.
  6. ↑ Fouts, Joshua (2009-10-13). "Social Media, Virtual Worlds and Public Diplomacy". World Politics Review. WPR LLC. Archived from the original on 2010-01-31. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
  7. ↑ Tutt. A. (2013), E-Diplomacy Capacities within the EU-27: Small States and Social Media. 23 May 2014. Retrieved 2015-09-17.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  8. ↑ "Foreign ministry promotes digital diplomacy". RADIO THE VOICE OF VIETNAM. VOVNews. 2009-10-27. Archived from the original on 2009-11-09. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
  9. ↑ "What is digital diplomacy?". Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Archived from the original on 2012-04-20.
  10. ↑ "21st Century Statecraft". US State Department.
  11. ↑ "Welcome / Bienvenue". international.gc.ca.
  12. ↑ "The Cadieux-Léger Fellowship". DFAIT. Archived from the original on 2013-10-02. Retrieved 2013-08-15.
  13. ↑ Tham, Davina. "Taiwan's digital diplomacy gets a kickstart". www.taipeitimes.com. Taipei Times. Retrieved 8 January 2020.
  14. ↑ "United States Government Accountability Office [GAO] Cyber Diplomacy [U.S. Department of] State's Efforts Aim to Support U.S. Interests and Elevate Priorities: Report to Congressional Addressees" (PDF). January 2024.
  15. ↑ "Nicholas Westcott, Digital Diplomacy: The Impact of the Internet on International Relations, OII, Research Report 16, July 2008" (PDF). Retrieved 2024-06-04.
  16. ↑ "About digital diplomacy". Archived from the original on 2012-03-28. Retrieved 2012-03-12.
  17. ↑ "Sweden's Carl Bildt 'best connected' Twitter leader". BBC News. 24 July 2013.
  18. ↑ "Twiplomacy - Mutual Relations on Twitter". Archived from the original on 29 August 2012. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
  19. ↑ Bilefsky, Dan (13 December 2013). "Kosovo Attains Status (on Facebook) It Has Sought for Years: Nation". The New York Times. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  20. ↑ "PDiN Monitor - USC Center on Public Diplomacy". uscpublicdiplomacy.org. 9 April 2014.
  21. ↑ "TWEET THIS: STUDY FINDS LIMITS TO NEW 'TWIPLOMACY'". Associated Press. 26 July 2012. Archived from the original on 26 July 2012. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
  22. ↑ Miles, Tom (26 July 2012). "@tweeter-in-chief? Obama's outsourced tweets top twitocracy". Reuters. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
  23. ↑ Khazan, Olga (26 July 2012). "Diplomats on Twitter: Putin follows no one". Washington Post. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
  24. ↑ Internazionale, Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione. "13 Embassies in the US capital together for International Women's Day 2020". ambwashingtondc.esteri.it. Retrieved 2024-04-09.
  25. 1 2 "Twiplomacy Study 2020". Twiplomacy. July 20, 2020. Retrieved September 24, 2020.
  26. ↑ "Facebook diplomacy: peace may be just a click away". Google News. AFP. 2008-12-04. Archived from the original on April 12, 2010. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
  27. ↑ "Facebook Developer Garage". Archived from the original on 2009-12-23. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
  28. 1 2 Duncombe, Constance (2019-04-22). "Digital Diplomacy: Emotion and Identity in the Public Realm". The Hague Journal of Diplomacy . 14 (1–2): 102–116. doi:10.1163/1871191X-14101016. ISSN   1871-1901. S2CID   159416123.
  29. 1 2 3 Pamment, James (2015-03-23). "Digital diplomacy as transmedia engagement: Aligning theories of participatory culture with international advocacy campaigns". New Media & Society. 18 (9): 2046–2062. doi:10.1177/1461444815577792. S2CID   5997200.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Manor, Ilan; Segev, Elad (2020). "Social Media Mobility: Leveraging Twitter Networks in Online Diplomacy". Global Policy. 11 (2): 233–244. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12799. ISSN   1758-5899. S2CID   218846152.
  31. ↑ "Digital diplomacy". www.diplomacy.edu. Retrieved 2023-02-02.
  32. 1 2 3 4 Duncombe, Constance (2018). "Twitter and the Challenges of Digital Diplomacy". SAIS Review of International Affairs. 38 (2): 91–100. doi:10.1353/sais.2018.0019. ISSN   1945-4724. S2CID   159358068.

[1]

Further reading

  1. ↑ "Westcott, Nicholas - Digital Diplomacy: The Impact of the Internet on International Relations. Research Report No. 16" (PDF). Oxford Internet Institute.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.