Emergency State (book)

Emergency State
Author	Adam Wagner
Country	United Kingdom
Language	English
Subject	COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom
Publisher	The Bodley Head of Penguin Random House
Publication date	2022
Pages	222
ISBN	978-1-847-92746-0

Last updated January 17, 2024

Emergency State: How We lost Our Freedoms in the Pandemic and Why it Matters is a book by UK human rights lawyer Adam Wagner.^[1]^[2] The book explores how the UK government during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated Government response had unprecedented powers to make and change legislation at will without accountability and what safeguards could be created to prevent this in the future.^[3] Wagner was appointed to work on the Independent Commission on UK Public Health Emergency Powers.^[3]^[4]

In this book, Wagner argues that COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom brought the country as close to a police state as in living memory.^[5] Wagner makes suggestions in response to events during the pandemic including suggesting a review of the fixed penalty notices and other penalties issues during COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom, for a codified constitution in the United Kingdom, and for opposition members of parliament to be involved in pandemic meetings.^[6]

The book comprises a preface and nine chapters: States of Emergency, Very Strong Measures, Take It on the Chin, You Must Stay at Home, The Lockdown Bites, Patchwork Summer, The Darkest Winter, Step by Step, and Freedom Regained?.^[1]^{: 1, Table of contents} The second to eighth chapters are ordered chronologically and summarise the number of cases and deaths.

The book has notes, a list of relevant legislation, and index of cases.^[1]^{: 177, 219, 221}It provides an infographic showing how covid cases and deaths progressed during the pandemic and which restrictrictions were in place at these times and a timeline of restrictions.^[1]^: 172,173

The book discusses how during existential threats states reorganize themselves in what Wagner dubs Emergency States to tackle the crisis and equates them to historic precedents.^[7] Wagner notes six properties of the emergency state, that it is "mighty" and can marshal very larger resources to a goal; that power is concentrated; that the state becomes ignorant due to the centralised decision making; that it tends to corruption; that it is self-reinforcing with people used to absolute power tending to think of excuses to keep it; the final feature is that people often want to be ruled in this manner during emergencies due to a desire for simplicity, strong leadership.^[1]^: 11–14 Wagner argues that any society can rearrange itself towards a common cause, good or bad, drawing comparisons to the War on terror following the September 11 attacks and the Holocaust, quoting George Orwell arguing the importance of role of public opinion in influencing the laws that are enforced and created.^[1]^: 16

He notes the comparison to the ancient Roman emergency dictatorial practice of Justitium,^[1]^: 24,23 the British State during the second world war,^[1]^: 28 and Elizabethan plague orders in England for bubonic plague.^[1]^: 35^[7]

1 States of Emergency

In the first chapter, Wagner introduces the concept of the Emergency State, the manner in which the State functions during an existential crisis such as famine, pandemic, or war drawing comparison to other historic crises.^[1]^: 9,16

2 Very Strong Measures

Wagner notes that most modern states have legislation to allow emergency powers where constitutional protections for fundamental rights can be suspended. He cites the case of Liversidge v Anderson where the House of Lords Judges ruled that the Home Secretary need not provide any reason for their decision to indefinitely detain someone for that decision to be reasonable.^[1]^: 29

Wagner traces the history of the emergency powers in the Public Health Act to the SARS outbreak of 2002,^[8] after which the World Health Organization had encouraged states to create emergency legislation.^[1]^: 31 He notes that there was concern about the breadth of powers during parliamentary debate at the time of reading.^[1]^: 32

Wagner traces the history of lockdowns, arguing that while social distancing has a long history national lockdowns are new.^[1]^: 33 He draws comparisons to plague orders in England during outbreaks of the bubonic plague,^[1]^: 35 and notes that Sierra Leone had a three-day lockdown in response to Ebola in 2014.^[1]^: 38

3 Take It on the Chin

Wagner discusses the history of the European Court of Human Rights, ECHR, as a means to stop the slide into authoritarianism.^[1]^: 46 He cites Pierre-Henri Teitgen, a founder of the ECHR as arguing that the risk authoritarianism was not appreciated before its rise in the 1900s,^[1]^: 47 and argues that at times authoritarians do not take power by force but are invited.^[1]^: 48 Wagner discusses the imposition of lockdowns imposition of COVID-19 lockdowns internationally during the early period of the pandemic.^[1]^: 48–56

4 You Must Stay at Home

In this chapter, Wagner discusses the imposition of lockdowns and stay-at-home orders during the early stages of the pandemic in the UK.

He argues that the lockdown regulations implemented by Matt Hancock fundamentally altered the relationship of the citizen with the state in that they only allowed certain activities rather than banning them and were 'Napoleonic' in nature.^[1]^: 61 Wagner notes vagueness surrounding lockdown laws and the difference between governmental guidance the law.^[1]^: 63 He discusses the issuing of fixed penalty notices, FPNs, during COVID-19,^[1]^: 68 and the effects of Dominic Cummings' violation of lockdown guidance.^[1]^: 70–73

5 The Lockdown Bites

This chapter discusses lockdowns effects on education.^[1]^: 79–81 Wagner argues that lockdowns affected some such as those who were pregnant, those who lived alone, in cramped flats, without access to a garden, had abusive partners, or had ill relatives and that they widened social and ethnic inequalities.^[1]^: 82–84 Wagner discusses the fact that COVID amounted to a ban on sexual relations for those who did not cohabit,^[1]^: 85–89 arguing that it was ironic that Matt Hancock who approved most covid measures resigned due to having an extramarital affair with an aide in the workplace.^[1]^: 89

6 Patchwork Summer

This chapter discusses lockdowns during the summer of 2020.^[1]^: 90 It gives the example of a local lockdown in Leicester that was imposed and enforced before the legislation approving local lockdowns had been published.^[1]^: 93–94 Wagner notes that legislation surrounding COVID-19 restrictions changed very quickly, with the laws on averaging changing once a week,^[1]^: 97 and the chaotic way in which the government communicated legislation.^[8] He draws parallels to the covid regulations and the concept of a "dog law" used by Jeremy Bentham, a law that it is impossible to know or follow ahead of time.^[1]^: 95–96 Wagner discusses the prosecution of protests against lockdowns and the ethics surrounding the right to protest during pandemics.^[1]^: 97–100

7 The Darkest Winter

In this chapter Wagner discusses the Winter of 2020–2021.^[1]^: 101 Wagner discusses rules to quarantine in hotels,^[1]^{: 132–137} and legal challenges to emergency legislation brought by Simon Dolan.^[1]^{: 119–123}

Wagner discusses an exception to covid regulations made that allowed hunting and grouse shooting.^[1]^{: 103–104} This is given an example^[1]^: 104 of a form of banal corruption that could have arisen from Covid Operations Cabinet Committee having so much power.^[1]^: 105 The Committee consisted of four members Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Rishi Sunak and Matt Hancock as well as a few other key officials.^[1]^{: 105–106} Wagner equates this the Hannah Arendt's concept of banal evil where officials claim to just follow orders.^: 104

8 Step by Step

This chapter discusses vaccination against covid and the use of vaccine passports,^[1]^{: 139–142} issues surrounding the policing of the vigil for Sarah Everard,^[1]^{: 142–147} who had been murdered by a police officer, and the emergence of partygate, the revelation that a number of illegal gatherings had taken place in the houses of parliament during lockdown.^[1]^{: 151–157}

9 Freedom Regained?

In the concluding chapter, Wagner argues that Boris Johnson's government saw democracy as an inconvenience.^[1]^: 161 Wagner argues government was able to take over rule from parliament for two years due to a submissive parliament, weak legal protections, politicians who saw democratic process as an inconvenience, and lacked integrity.^[1]^{: 161–162} Wagner notes his lack of scientific qualifications but argues that some form of social distancing is still unavoidable during the initial stages of pandemics.^[1]^: 165

Wagner argues that the Public Health Act is a flawed piece of legislation allowing government to legislate without accountability, noting that the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 still gives the government immense power while providing Parliament more scrutiny both in terms of the timeliness of review at the ability for parliament to amend legislation.^[1]^: 162 Wagner contrasts the United Kingdom legislation to Scotland, Sweden, Finland, New Zealand and Singapore as providing more scrutiny of measures.^[1]^: 163

He notes a process of "follow the science", where decisions were taken but COVID-19 Cabinet Committees based on advice from the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts presided over by four ministers which were highly secretive.^[1]^: 163

Wagner offers four suggestions to reduce the power of the Emergency State. Firstly, that the powers of the Public Health Act should be limited in the same way as the civil contingencies act,^[1]^: 165 secondly that all prosecutions and fixed penalty notices issues under COVID regulation should be reviewed,^[1]^: 166 thirdly that there should be a codified constitution,^[1]^: 166 and lastly that human rights should form a central part of decision making during emergencies.^[1]^: 167

Reception

Reviewers said that the book was a definitive regarding, and the 'fullest account' of, law during the pandemic.^[8]^[9] Benjamin Seifert of The Law Society Gazette, said that the book was the definitive guide to the law during the pandemic and would serve an important historical account and notes Wagner's perspective as a human rights lawyer and how his role in the Reclaim These Streets legal cases give him a first hand perspective.^[8] Former UK Supreme Court Judge, Jonathan Sumption, reviewing the book in The Daily Telegraph, said that book is the 'fullest account' of how the government used legal coercion to restrict basic human freedoms.^[9]

Critics commented on Wagner not assessing on the merits of lockdown restrictions. Sumption felt Wagner was qualified to do so and that human rights lawyers had a role in protecting basic freedoms.^[9] Stephen Bush, of the Financial Times, felt that the book should justify lockdowns for fear that readers might view the loss of human rights as justifying the absence of restrictions in future pandemics.^[7] Reviewing in The Critic, Yuan Yi Zhu describes Wagner's lack of comment on the merits as "narrow proceduralism", accusing Wagner of trying to criticise lockdown regulation procedurally while avoiding the public criticism of being seen to criticise the policy.^[10] Quentin Letts commented on the books failure to consider the role of the media in lockdowns.^[6]

Sumption and Yuan Yi Zhu argue that critique of parliamentary process are not important because of the popularity of lockdown policies and the fact that the opposition supported tougher measures.^[9]^[10]

Jonathan Sumption argues that an attitude of refusing to form opinions due to a claim lack of expertise, as applied by Wagner in the book, contributed to the publics acceptance of restrictions and if applied in the future would result in sacrificing humanity to technocrats. ^[9] Bush comments that the situations that resulted in "Covid states" is near certain to happen again and that the book is a vital contribution to a debate about how to ensure the next pandemic does not damage the democratic model.^[7] Robert Low of The Jewish Chronicle says that it is hard to disagree with the books conclusions that the UK came as close to a police state as in living memory.^[5]

Quentin Letts, reviewing the book in The Times, said that it did not "quite sing" but made valid points. He comments that Wagner's tone is self-righteous and notes the absence of commentary of the media during the lockdowns who he considers complicit in stricter lockdown measures.^[6]

Related Research Articles

A state of emergency is a situation in which a government is empowered to put through policies that it would normally not be permitted to do, for the safety and protection of its citizens. A government can declare such a state during a natural disaster, civil unrest, armed conflict, medical pandemic or epidemic or other biosecurity risk.

The Internal Security Act 1960 was a preventive detention law in force in Malaysia. The legislation was enacted after the Federation of Malaya gained independence from Britain in 1957. The ISA allows for detention without trial or criminal charges under limited, legally defined circumstances. On 15 September 2011, the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Najib Razak said that this legislation will be repealed and replaced by two new laws. The ISA was replaced and repealed by the Security Offences Act 2012 which has been passed by Parliament and given the royal assent on 18 June 2012. The Act came into force on 31 July 2012.

Jonathan Philip Chadwick Sumption, Lord Sumption,, KC, is a British author, medieval historian and former senior judge who sat on the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom between 2012 and 2018.

Law, Legislation and Liberty (1973–1979) is a work in three volumes by Nobel laureate economist and political philosopher Friedrich Hayek.

Civil liberties in the United Kingdom are part of UK constitutional law and have a long and formative history. This is usually considered to have begun with Magna Carta of 1215, a landmark document in British constitutional history. Development of civil liberties advanced in common law and statute law in the 17th and 18th centuries, notably with the Bill of Rights 1689. During the 19th century, working-class people struggled to win the right to vote and join trade unions. Parliament responded with new legislation beginning with the Reform Act 1832. Attitudes towards suffrage and liberties progressed further in the aftermath of the first and second world wars. Since then, the United Kingdom's relationship to civil liberties has been mediated through its membership of the European Convention on Human Rights. The United Kingdom, through Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe, led the drafting of the Convention, which expresses a traditional civil libertarian theory. It became directly applicable in UK law with the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998.

"Everything which is not forbidden is allowed" is a legal maxim. It is the concept that any action can be taken unless there is a law against it. It is also known in some situations as the "general power of competence" whereby the body or person being regulated is acknowledged to have competent judgement of their scope of action.

The Public Health Act 1984 is a piece of legislation for England and Wales which requires physicians to notify the 'proper officer' of the local authority of any person deemed to be suffering from a notifiable disease. It also provides powers to isolate infected individuals to prevent the spread of such a disease. The act forms the basis of various legislation connected to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

The public health measures associated with the COVID-19 pandemic effectively contained and reduced the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on a global scale between the years 2020–2023, and had several other positive effects on the natural environment of planet Earth and human societies as well, including improved air quality and oxygen levels due to reduced air and water pollution, lower crime rates across the world, and less frequent violent crimes perpetrated by violent non-state actors, such as ISIS and other Islamic terrorist organizations.

The political impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is the influence that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on politics around the world. The pandemic has affected the governing and political systems of multiple countries, reflected in states of emergency, suspensions of legislative activities, isolation or deaths of multiple politicians and reschedulings of elections due to fears of spreading the virus. The pandemic has triggered broader debates about political issues such as the relative advantages of democracy and autocracy, how states respond to crises, politicization of beliefs about the virus, and the adequacy of existing frameworks of international cooperation. Additionally, the pandemic has, in some cases, posed several challenges to democracy, leading to it being undermined and damaged.

The Coronavirus Act 2020 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that granted the government emergency powers to handle the COVID-19 pandemic. The act allowed the government the discretionary power to limit or suspend public gatherings, to detain individuals suspected to be infected by COVID-19, and to intervene or relax regulations in a range of sectors to limit transmission of the disease, ease the burden on public health services, and assist healthcare workers and the economically affected. Areas covered by the act included the National Health Service, social care, schools, police, Border Force, local councils, funerals and courts. The act was introduced to Parliament on 19 March 2020, and passed the House of Commons without a vote on 23 March, and the House of Lords on 25 March. The act received royal assent on 25 March 2020.

The Health Act 2020 was an Act of the Oireachtas which provided for additional powers for the state in the extraordinary circumstances of the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Biosecurity Act 2015 is an Act of the Parliament of Australia which manages biosecurity risks in Australia. It was enacted on 16 June 2015, after the Bill was passed with bipartisan support on 14 May 2015. It covers both agricultural and human medical biosecurity risks, including epidemics and pandemics, and is designed to contain and/or deal with any "diseases and pests that may cause harm to human, animal or plant health or the environment" in Australia.

The Health Protection (England) Regulations 2020, informally known as "the Lockdown Regulations", was a statutory instrument (SI) enacted on 26 March 2020 by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It became the principal delegated English legislation restricting freedom of movement, gatherings, and business closures during the COVID-19 emergency period until its revocation by The Health Protection (England) Regulations 2020 on 4 July 2020.

The COVID-19 Public Health Response Act 2020 is a standalone legislation passed by the New Zealand Parliament on 13 May 2020 to provide a legal framework for dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand over the next two years or until the COVID-19 pandemic is brought under control. The Act allows the Minister of Health to make orders under Section 11 to give effect to the public health response to the COVID-19 in New Zealand.

During the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, numerous protests took place over the government's response.

The COVID-19 protests in Canada are protests that began in April 2020, with protests in Vancouver, Toronto, Edmonton, and Ottawa against the Government of Canada's response to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent measures.

The COVID-19 pandemic in Western Australia is part of the ongoing worldwide pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Western Australia (WA) confirmed its first case of COVID-19 on 21 February 2020, and its first death on 1 March. On 15 March, premier Mark McGowan declared a state of emergency. On 24 March, Western Australia closed its borders to the rest of Australia, and on 1 April, the state implemented borders between regions in the state. By mid-April 2020, the state had eliminated community transmission of COVID-19, becoming one of the few places in the world to do so. There were only a handful of cases of community transmission in the state after mid-April, until late December 2021 when a tourist caused an outbreak that led to the cancelling of some New Year's Eve events, and the re-imposing of mask wearing rules in Perth and the Peel region.

Adam Wagner is a Doughty Street Chambers barrister, a member of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's panel of counsel.

This article documents the chronology of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic in October 2022, which originated in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Some developments may become known or fully understood only in retrospect. Reporting on this pandemic began in December 2019.

The Lockdown Files are a series of articles in The Daily Telegraph containing evidence, analysis, speculation, and opinion relating to more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages obtained from former health secretary Matt Hancock that were leaked to them.

References

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Wagner, Adam (2022). Emergency state : the freedoms we lost in the pandemic and how to get them back. London. ISBN 978-1-84792-746-0. OCLC 1338679624.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
↑ "How we lost our freedoms – read all about it". Law Gazette. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
1 2 Cunliffe, Rachel (2022-10-13). ""We are uniquely unprotected" from our own government: Adam Wagner on the Emergency State". New Statesman. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
↑ "The lockdown bonfire of Britain's freedoms | John Jolliffe". The Critic Magazine. 2022-11-01. Retrieved 2022-11-02.
1 2 "Book review: Emergency State: How We Lost Our Freedoms in the Pandemic and Why it Matters - When Covid ruled us". www.thejc.com. Jewish Chronicle . Retrieved 2022-10-23.
1 2 3 Letts, Quentin. "Emergency State by Adam Wagner review — how liberty became lockdown's first casualty". The Times . ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original on 2022-09-24. Retrieved 2022-10-23.
1 2 3 4 "Emergency State — when lockdowns encroach on liberty". Financial Times. 2022-10-27. Retrieved 2022-10-28.
1 2 3 4 October 2022, Benjamin Seifert21. "Emergency State: How We Lost Our Freedoms in the Pandemic and Why it Matters". Law Gazette. Retrieved 2022-10-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
1 2 3 4 5 Sumption, Jonathan (2022-11-08). "Lockdown was a sustained assault on our rights – and our humanity". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235 . Retrieved 2022-11-09.
1 2 Yuan Yi Zhu (2022-11-22). "Missing the point of lockdown". The Critic .

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[:3-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Wagner, Adam (2022). Emergency state : the freedoms we lost in the pandemic and how to get them back. London. ISBN 978-1-84792-746-0. OCLC 1338679624.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

[2] "How we lost our freedoms – read all about it". Law Gazette. Retrieved 2022-10-23.

[:2-3] 1 2 Cunliffe, Rachel (2022-10-13). ""We are uniquely unprotected" from our own government: Adam Wagner on the Emergency State". New Statesman. Retrieved 2022-10-23.

[4] "The lockdown bonfire of Britain's freedoms | John Jolliffe". The Critic Magazine. 2022-11-01. Retrieved 2022-11-02.

[:0-5] 1 2 "Book review: Emergency State: How We Lost Our Freedoms in the Pandemic and Why it Matters - When Covid ruled us". www.thejc.com. Jewish Chronicle . Retrieved 2022-10-23.

[:1-6] 1 2 3 Letts, Quentin. "Emergency State by Adam Wagner review — how liberty became lockdown's first casualty". The Times . ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original on 2022-09-24. Retrieved 2022-10-23.

[:5-7] 1 2 3 4 "Emergency State — when lockdowns encroach on liberty". Financial Times. 2022-10-27. Retrieved 2022-10-28.

[:4-8] 1 2 3 4 October 2022, Benjamin Seifert21. "Emergency State: How We Lost Our Freedoms in the Pandemic and Why it Matters". Law Gazette. Retrieved 2022-10-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

[:6-9] 1 2 3 4 5 Sumption, Jonathan (2022-11-08). "Lockdown was a sustained assault on our rights – and our humanity". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235 . Retrieved 2022-11-09.

[:7-10] 1 2 Yuan Yi Zhu (2022-11-22). "Missing the point of lockdown". The Critic .

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]