Eucholoeops

Last updated

Eucholoeops
Temporal range: Early Miocene Santacrucian
~17.4  Ma
Ꞓ
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
↓
Reports of the Princeton University Expeditions to Patagonia, 1896-1899 (PLATE LVI) (6859446734).jpg
Skull and jaw elements of Eucholoeops ingens
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Pilosa
Family:† Megalonychidae
Genus:† Eucholoeops
Ameghino, 1887
Type species
†Eucholoeops ingens
Ameghino, 1887
Synonyms [1]
Synonyms of E. ingens
  • †E. externus Ameghino, 1891
  • †E. fissognathusAmeghino, 1891
  • †E. frontoAmeghino, 1891
  • †E. lafoneiMercerat, 1891
  • †E. latifronsMercerat, 1891
  • †E. latirostrisAmeghino, 1891
  • †E. litoralisAmeghino, 1891
  • †E. curtusAmeghino, 1894

Eucholoeops (sometimes incorrectly spelled Eucholaeops [2] ) is a genus of megalonychid ground sloth that lived in southernmost Argentina. Fossils have been recovered from the lower Santa Cruz Formation of Patagonia, which has been dated to the Early Miocene. The type species, E. ingens, was named by Florentino Ameghino in 1887 based on skull fossils, encased in geological matrix, from the collection of his brother. These remains were never removed from the matrix, and have since been lost. Florentino Ameghino went on to name five more species if Eucholoeops, and another palaeontologist, Aldice Mercerat, named two more. All are now believed to represent the same taxon as E. ingens, and the lost type specimen has been replaced with a neotype lower jaw.

Contents

Though fairly small compared to the giant ground sloths of the Pliocene and Pleistocene, Eucholoeops was larger than any modern species, and with an estimated body mass of 80 kg (180 lb). In many ways it resembles Hapalops , to the point where the two genera were briefly regarded as one and the same. It is distinguished by its broad muzzle, very deep mandible, and the shape of its upper molariforms (teeth comparable to the molars of other mammals), among other characteristics. The caniniforms, teeth resembling the canines of other mammal groups, jutted forward in Eucholoeops more than they did in other megalonychids.

Like other megalonychids, Eucholoeops likely fed primarily on leaves, relying primarily on orthal (up-and-down) movements of the jaw to process food. Its teeth would have sheared and cut vegetation as it masticated. The environment in which it lived was likely open and fairly cool, with low precipitation for most of the year. Temperate and semi-arid forests covered most of the Santa Cruz environment, and seasonal flooding gave rise to grass-covered marshlands. The fauna of Eucholoeops coexisted with included South American native ungulates, other ground sloths, and phorusrhacid birds.

Taxonomy

Early history

The type specimen of Eucholoeops was a complete skull and mandible, largely embedded in matrix, discovered on the banks of the Santa Cruz River of southern Patagonia, Argentina. [3] The strata from which it was recovered are part of the early-to-late Miocene Santa Cruz Formation. [1] The specimen ended up in the collection of palaeontologist Carlos Ameghino, and was described and named by his brother, Florentino, in 1887, as part of a larger two-part paper discussing fossils in Carlos' collection. [4] The type specimen has since been lost, [1] and was never figured, as it was never fully extracted from the matrix that encompassed it. [5] Five additional species of Eucholoeops (E. externus, E. fissognathus, E. fronto, E. latirostris, E. litoralis) were named four years later, also by Florentino Ameghino; [6] he went on to name another species, E. curtus, three years later. [7] Two more, E. lafonei and E. latifrons, had been named by Alcide Mercerat, in the same year as Ameghino's first paper. [8] These were synonymised with existing species by Ameghino. [7] In 1894, Richard Lydekker suggested that most of the Santa Cruz ground sloth genera could be whittled to just two: Eucholoeops and Pseudhapalops . [5] Hapalops , named by Ameghino in 1887, [4] was considered a junior synonym of Eucholoeops. [5] This extreme taxonomic lumping not been followed by subsequent authors. [3] The validity of most of the species named after E. ingens has been called into question, [3] and they are currently treated as junior synonyms. [1] The type specimen of E. fronto consists of a maxilla and a mandible, and in the absence of the original type specimen, the mandible (MPM-PV 3401) has been designated the neotype of E. ingens. [1]

Classification

Eucholoeops was a megalonychid, a family within the order Folivora which contains all of sloths. Megalonychids existed from the Deseadan SALMA (29–21 mya) to the Rancholabrean NALMA (240,000 BCE to 11,000 BCE), the last surviving genus being Megalonyx itself from North America. [9] Megalonychids were long-considered to be an extant group including the two-toed sloth genus Choeloepus. However, analyses of the collagen and DNA of fossils of folivorans proved that Choloepus was instead related to mylodontids, another family of ground sloths. Fossils of early megalonychids are rare, the oldest named being of the genus Deseadognathus from Argentina and Bolivia, [10] though even older fossils from the Early Oligocene have been tentatively reported from Puerto Rico. [11] The megalonychids later saw an explosion in diversity during the Middle-Upper Miocene in the Americas, primarily among the Santacrucian (17.5–16.3 mya) and Friasian (16.3–15.5) sites of Argentina, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Brazil. Extensive waterways formed in South America during this period, giving way to a more subtropical climate fostering a variety of flora and fauna to evolve in this environment. Megalonychids also expanded their range north, with genera like Zacatzontli from Mexico evolving on the North American continent prior to the development of the Isthmus of Panama. [12] Megalonychids had spread throughout the Caribbean and as far north as the Yukon Territory, Canada by their demise at the end of the Pleistocene, [13] though the closely related three-toed sloth Bradypus is extant. Research of evolutionary size trends suggests that in contrast to other ground sloth groups that grew over time, megalonychids did not exponentially increase in mass but instead varied greatly around the same amount until their extinction. [14] [15]

The following sloth family phylogenetic tree is based on collagen and mitochondrial DNA sequence data (see Fig. 4 of Presslee et al., 2019). [16]

Xenarthra

Cingulata (armadillos and allies)

Pilosa

Vermilingua (anteaters)

Folivora

Megalocnidae (Caribbean sloths)

Nothrotheriidae (ground sloths)

Megatheriidae (giant ground sloths)

Megalonychidae

Bradypodidae (three-toed sloths)

Scelidotheriidae (two-toed sloths)

("Edentata")  

Description

Eucholoeops was smaller than the giants of the Pliocene and Pleistocene (such as Eremotherium and Megatherium ). It was, however, still large in comparison to modern sloths. The smallest Eucholoeops skull (MACN-A6413), measured from the upper caniniform teeth to the posterior (rear) margin of the occipital condyles, was a little over 11.5 cm (4.5 in) in length. The largest skull, MPM PV3401, measures around 16.5 cm (6.5 in) in length. [3] It has been estimated that Eucholoeops weighed around 80 kg (180 lb). [17]

Skull and dentition

The skull of Eucholoeops was similar to that of other megalonychids. [17] Dorsally (from above), it was somewhat convex, in a fashion similar to other megalonychids. The muzzle was fairly robust, more so than in close relatives, which partly contributed to erroneous depictions of Eucholeops with a prominent depression between the viscerocranium (facial part of the skull) and the neurocranium (cranial part of the skull). [3] The skull overall is broader and heavier than that of the related Hapalops, with larger sagittal and occipital crests. [17] Typically among sloths, the premaxillae were only loosely connected to one another and the maxilla. [3] Unlike in other sloth genera, the facial portion of the maxilla stops at the caniniform (a tooth found exclusively in sloths, analogous to the canines of other mammals). [3] [17] The main body of the mandible, the mandibular corpus, was abnormally massive. [17] The coronoid process of the mandible was similar to that of Hapalops, though with a condyle that is slightly higher. [3] Eucholoeops had a dental formula of 5/4: there were four molariforms, flat teeth analogous to the cheek teeth of other mammals, and one caniniform on the upper jaw; there were three lower molars and one lower caniniform on the lower jaw. All of the teeth are separated by small gaps (diastemata). [17] The caniniform was very large, triangular in cross-section, and projected forwards. This is unlike the condition seen in other megalonychids, where the caniniform was small, sometimes cylindrical, and non-projecting. The molariforms, mostly resembled those of other ground sloths, though were notable in that they, especially the first and second molariforms of the upper jaw, were expanded transversely (across), and in some cases were medially and distally compressed. Some individual variation was present. The smallest molariform on the upper jaw was the fourth. [3]

Postcranial skeleton

Life restoration of the related ground sloth Megalonyx. Megalonyx wheatleyi12.jpg
Life restoration of the related ground sloth Megalonyx .

The postcrania of Eucholoeops are represented by limb elements. The humerus is large, with a proximal portion (that close to the body) that is subcylindrical and widen into a flattened distal portion (that far from the body): this condition is seen in all non-mylodontid sloths. Similar to Hapalops, the lesser tubercle is larger than the greater tubercle. As in several other extinct sloth genera, the tubercles are widely separated. The radius has a less steeply inclined head than in other megalonychids. The ulna is not preserved in any specimen. Most of the carpal elements assigned to Eucholoeops are catalogued under FMNH P13125; however, they may belong to Hapalops. The capitate bone of the wrist is wider distally (far from the body axis) than it is proximally, a condition also seen in Megalonyx and members of Nothrotheriidae. The first metacarpal is around half the length of the others. The second and fourth metacarpals are about as robust and long as the third; this differs from the typical sloth condition, second the third and third metacarpals are roughly equal in size, but shorter than the fourth and fifth. The phalangeal (digit) elements do not meaningfully differ from those of other ground sloths. The femur is known only from a single specimen. It is wide and flat, typical for ground sloths, and in many ways, it resembles that of Acratocnus . [3]

Palaeoecology

Palaeoenvironment

Eucholoeops is known from the Santa Cruz Formation, which dates from the Burdigalian to the early Langhian of the early to middle Miocene [18] (18–15.2 mya). [19] The formation is divided into three temporal intervals: localities FL 1–7, Barrancas Blancas, and Segundas Barrancas Blancas. Of these, Eucholoeops is known only from localities FL 1–7, representing the lower, and thus older, layers of the formation. [18] The depositional environment of the Santa Cruz Formation had a mean annual temperature of around 8 °C, and low precipitation compared to more northern parts of South America at the time. [18] The cooling trend that began in the late Miocene had not yet occurred. The palaeoenvironment was likely fairly open, with temperate and semi-arid forests. Seasonal flooding occurred, likely leading to the formation of marshlands that hosted grasses and forbs. [20] The mammal fauna of the FL 1–7 localities include the meriodiolestidan Necrolestes , sparassodonts such as Borhyaena and Cladosictis , several extinct marsupials (including Microbiotherium , a relative of the extant monito del monte), several armadillos (including glyptodonts), the anteater Protamandua , ground sloths (Eucholoeops itself, Hapalops, Hyperleptus , Nematherium , and Pelecynodon ), notoungulates (such as Astrapotherium , Interatherium , Nesodon and Thoatherium ) the chinchillid Perimys , the octodontid Spaniomys , the porcupine Steiromys , and the primate Homunculus . Birds are represented by ratites, anseriforms, gruiforms, pelicans, storks, falcons, [18] and the phorusrhacids Patagornis and Phorusrhacos . [21] A tegu in the genus Tupinambis [20] and several iguanians and colubrid snakes comprise the Santa Cruz's reptile fauna. [18]

Feeding mechanics

Megalonychid sloths, and megatherioids as a whole, were (and still are) generally leaf-eaters. Eucholeops, in this regard, was typical of its group. Wear patterns on the teeth suggest orthal movements, simple up-and-down movements of the lower jaw, were the main form of mastication. The temporalis muscle was powerful, suggesting a strong role in such orthal movements. Due to its dental morphology, when chewing, Eucholeops' teeth would have punctured, sheared and torn plant matter. [17]

Related Research Articles

<i>Mylodon</i> Extinct genus of mylodontid ground sloths

Mylodon is an extinct genus of ground sloth belonging to the family Mylodontidae, known from southern South America. With a total length of 3 to 4 m and a body mass of 1-2 tonnes, it is one of the largest mylodontids.

<i>Homunculus</i> (genus) Extinct genus of monkey

Homunculus is an extinct genus of New World monkey that lived in Patagonia during the Miocene. Two species are known: Homunculus patagonicus and Homunculus vizcainoi, which are known from material found in the Santa Cruz Formation in the far south of Argentina.

<i>Peltephilus</i> An extinct genus of mammals belonging to the armadillo order of xenarthrans

Peltephilus, the horned armadillo, is an extinct genus of armadillo xenarthran mammals that first inhabited Argentina during the Oligocene epoch, and became extinct in the Miocene epoch. Notably, the scutes on its head were so developed that they formed horns. Aside from the horned gophers of North America, it is the only known fossorial horned mammal. P. ferox had skull about 11.7 centimetres (4.6 in), and estimated body mass is around 11.07 kilograms (24.4 lb).

<i>Hapalops</i> Extinct genus of ground sloths

Hapalops is an extinct genus of ground sloth from the Early to Late Miocene of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, and Argentina in South America.

<i>Protypotherium</i> Extinct genus of notoungulates

Protypotherium is an extinct genus of notoungulate mammals native to South America during the Oligocene and Miocene epochs. A number of closely related animals date back further, to the Eocene. Fossils of Protypotherium have been found in the Deseadan Fray Bentos Formation of Uruguay, Muyu Huasi and Nazareno Formations of Bolivia, Cura-Mallín and Río Frías Formations of Chile, and Santa Cruz, Salicas, Ituzaingó, Aisol, Cerro Azul, Cerro Bandera, Cerro Boleadoras, Chichinales, Sarmiento and Collón Curá Formations of Argentina.

<i>Homalodotherium</i> Extinct genus of mammals

Homalodotherium is an extinct genus of South American native ungulates in the order Notoungulata. Fossils of Homalodotherium have been found in the Middle Miocene Santa Cruz Formation of Argentina and the Río Frías Formation of Chile. The first specimen, a partial skull, was discovered by Robert Holiver Cunningham while on an expedition to Patagonia. By the time it had arrived in England, it was degraded to the point where only a few elements remained. Regardless, in 1870, it was given its genus name by Thomas Henry Huxley, and its species name by William Henry Flower. The name was misspelled repeatedly over the years, leading to the erection of the family Homalodontotheriidae to include it, though this has since been amended to Homalodotheriidae. Since, then four more species of Homalodotherium have been named.

<i>Eremotherium</i> Extinct genus of giant ground sloth

Eremotherium is an extinct genus of giant ground sloth in the family Megatheriidae. Eremotherium lived in southern North America, Central America, and northern South America from the Pliocene, around 5.3 million years ago, to the end of the Late Pleistocene, around 10,000 years ago. Eremotherium was one of the largest ground sloths, with a body size comparable to elephants, weighing around 4.5 tonnes and measuring about 6 metres (20 ft) long, slightly larger than its close relative Megatherium.

<i>Lestodon</i> Extinct genus of ground sloths

Lestodon is an extinct genus of giant ground sloth native to South America during the Pleistocene epoch. Its fossil remains have been primarily been found in the Pampas and adjacent regions. The largest member of the family Mylodontidae, It is estimated to have weighed 4,100 kilograms. It was a herbivore and primarily fed on the grasses and low-growing plants.

<i>Ahytherium</i> Extinct genus of sloths

Ahytherium is an extinct genus of megalonychid sloth that lived during the Pleistocene of what is now Brazil. It contains a single species, A. aureum.

<i>Stegotherium</i> Extinct genus of mammals in the armadillo order of xenarthrans

Stegotherium is an extinct genus of long-nosed armadillo, belonging to the Dasypodidae family alongside the nine-banded armadillo. It is currently the only genus recognized as a member of the tribe Stegotheriini. It lived during the Early Miocene of Patagonia and was found in Colhuehuapian rocks from the Sarmiento Formation, Santacrucian rocks from the Santa Cruz Formation, and potentially also in Colloncuran rocks from the Middle Miocene Collón Curá Formation. Its strange, almost toothless and elongated skull indicates a specialization for myrmecophagy, the eating of ants, unique among the order Cingulata, which includes pampatheres, glyptodonts and all the extant species of armadillos.

<i>Proschismotherium</i> An extinct genus of ground sloth

Proschismotherium is an extinct genus of ground sloth of the family Megalonychidae, endemic to Argentina during the Early Miocene. It lived from 17.5 mya — 16.3 mya, existing for approximately 1.2 million years. The type, and only, species, P. oppositum, was named in 1902 by Florentino Ameghino based on a single specimen found in the Santacrucian-aged Colpodon Beds of Argentina. Ameghino in 1902 placed Proschismotherium in the Megatheriidae, alongside Hapaloides, which was its sister taxon.

Megathericulus is an extinct genus of ground sloths in the Megatheriidae family. It lived during the Middle Miocene, 11-16 Ma in what is now South America. Fossils have been found principally in Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru. It is a smaller representative of the megatheres. Despite being one of the earliest-known members of the family, its dentition structure is associated with homodont teeth belonging to the more modern line of evolution. The genus was scientifically named in 1904. Only one species is currently recognized, Megathericulus patagonicus.

Archaeomylodon is an extinct genus of mylodontine ground sloths that lived during the Middle Pleistocene of what is now Argentina. It is known so far only from a single skull, which in its dimensions corresponds to those of the giant Lestodon. However, the skull differs from this one by its narrower and higher snout. In addition, the anterior canine teeth, which are usually large in many mylodonts, are greatly reduced. The find comes from the Pampa region of South America and was deposited in about 700,000 years old sediments.

Eucinepeltus is an extinct genus of glyptodont. It lived during the Early Miocene, and its fossilized remains were discovered in South America.

<i>Cochlops</i> An extinct genus of mammals belonging to the armadillo order of xenarthrans

Cochlops is an extinct genus of glyptodont. It lived from the Early to Middle Miocene, and its fossilized remains have been found in South America.

Mesopotamocnus is an extinct genus of megalonychid ground sloth that lived during the Late Miocene in what is now Argentina. Fossils have been found in the Ituzaingó Formation of Argentina.

Analcitherium is an extinct genus of scelidotheriid sloth that lived during the Early Miocene in what is now Argentina. Fossils have been found in the Santa Cruz Formation of Argentina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Santa Cruz Formation</span> Geological formation in Patagonia

The Santa Cruz Formation is a geological formation in the Magallanes/Austral Basin in southern Patagonia in Argentina and adjacent areas of Chile. It dates to the late Early Miocene epoch, and is contemporaneous with the eponymous Santacrucian age of the SALMA timescale. The Santa Cruz Formation is known for its abundance of vertebrate fossils, including South American native ungulates, as well as rodents, xenarthrans, and metatherians.

<i>Ortotherium</i> Extinct genus of ground sloth

Ortotherium is a genus of megalonychid ground sloth from the Late Miocene Ituzaingó Formation of Entre Rios Province, Argentina. Although many species were described, the only valid species of the genus is Ortotherium laticurvatum, with many species being junior synonyms. Ortotherium is known from very fragmentary material, all of which is material from the mandible and teeth. The holotype of O. laticurvatum consists of an incomplete left dentary that had been unearthed from a series of sediments known as ‘Conglomerado osifero’ in Paraná, Argentina. Argentina paleontologist Florentino Ameghino named the species in 1885, though he would go on to name four more, invalid, species of the genus. One species however, O. brevirostrum, has been reclassified as Mesopotamocnus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peltephilidae</span> Family of South American cingulates (armadillos)

Peltephilidae is a family of South American cingulates (armadillos) that lived for over 40 million years, but peaked in diversity towards the end of the Oligocene and beginning of the Miocene in what is now Argentina. They were exclusive to South America due to its geographic isolation at the time, one of many of the continent's strange endemic families. Peltephilids are one of the earliest known cingulates, diverging from the rest of Cingulata in the Early Eocene.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 De Iuliis, Gerardo; Bargo, M. Susana; Toledo, Néstor; Tsuji, Leonard J. S.; Vizcaíno, Sergio F. (28 February 2024). "The Status of Eucholoeops fronto and E. lafonei (Xenarthra, Folivora, Megalonychidae) in the Systematics of the Early Miocene Eucholoeops (Santa Cruz, Argentina)". Ameghiniana. 61 (1). doi:10.5710/AMGH.15.12.2023.3578. ISSN   0002-7014.
  2. ↑ Bargo, M. Susana; Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Iuliis, Gerardo De (2011). "Eucholoeops Ameghino, 1887, is the Correct Generic Name of the Basal Megalonychidae (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Megatherioidea) Sloth from the Santa Cruz Formation (Upper Lower Miocene) of Argentina". Ameghiniana. 48 (2): 270–271. doi:10.5710/AMGH.v48i2(453). ISSN   0002-7014.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Iuliis, Gerardo De; Pujos, François; Toledo, Nestor; Bargo, M. Susana; Vizcaíno, Sergio F. (2014). "Eucholoeops Ameghino, 1887 (Xenarthra, Tardigrada, Megalonychidae) from the Santa Cruz Formation, Argentine Patagonia: implications for the systematics of Santacrucian sloths". Geodiversitas. 36 (2): 209–255. doi:10.5252/g2014n2a2. ISSN   1280-9659.
  4. 1 2 Ameghino, Florentino (1887). "Enumeración sistemática de las especies de mamíferos fósiles coleccionados por Carlos Ameghino en los terrenos eocenos de Patagonia Austral y depositados en el Museo de La Plata". Boletín del Museo de la Plata. 1: 1–26.
  5. 1 2 3 Lydekker, Richard (1894). Anales del Museo de La Plata. Paleontología argentina. Vol. v.3 (1894). La Plata: Taller de Publicaciones del Museo.
  6. ↑ Ameghino, Florentino (1891). "Nuevos restos de mamíferos fósiles descubiertos por Carlos Ameghino en el Eoceno inferior de la Patagonia austral. — Especies nuevas, adiciones y correcciones". Revista argentina de historia natural. 1: 289––328.
  7. 1 2 Ameghino, Florentino (1894). Énumération synoptique des espèces de mammifères fossiles des formations éocènes de Patagonie. Buenos Aires: Imp. de P.E. Coni é hijos.
  8. ↑ Mercerat, Alcide (1891). "Datos sobre restos de mamíferos fósiles pertenecientes a los Bruta". Revista del Museo de La Plata. 2: 1–46.
  9. ↑ McDonald, H. Gregory; Stafford, Thomas W.; Gnidovec, Dale M. (2015). "Youngest Radiocarbon Age for Jefferson's Ground Sloth, Megalonyx Jeffersonii (Xenarthra, Megalonychidae)". Quaternary Research. 83 (2): 355–359. Bibcode:2015QuRes..83..355G. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2014.11.006. ISSN   0033-5894. S2CID   129016865.
  10. ↑ Carlini, A. A., & Scillato-Vane, G. J. (2004). The oldest Megalonychidae (Xenarthra: Tardigrada); phylogenetic relationships and an emended diagnosis of the family. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen, 423–443.
  11. ↑ MacPhee, R. D. E., & Iturralde-Vinent, M. (1995). Origin of the Greater Antillean land mammal fauna. 1, New Tertiary fossils from Cuba and Puerto Rico. American Museum novitates; no. 3141.
  12. ↑ Stinnesbeck, Sarah R.; Frey, Eberhard; Olguín, Jerónimo Avíles; Stinnesbeck, Wolfgang; Zell, Patrick; Mallison, Heinrich; González González, Arturo; Aceves Núñez, Eugenio; Velázquez Morlet, Adriana; Terrazas Mata, Alejandro; Benavente Sanvicente, Martha; Hering, Fabio; Rojas Sandoval, Carmen (2017). "Xibalbaonyx oviceps, a new megalonychid ground sloth (Folivora, Xenarthra) from the Late Pleistocene of the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico, and its paleobiogeographic significance". PalZ. 91 (2): 245–271. Bibcode:2017PalZ...91..245S. doi:10.1007/s12542-017-0349-5. ISSN   0031-0220. S2CID   134188352.
  13. ↑ McDonald, H. G., Harington, C. R., & De Iuliis, G. (2000). The ground sloth Megalonyx from Pleistocene deposits of the Old Crow Basin, Yukon, Canada. Arctic, 213–220.
  14. ↑ Toledo, N.; Bargo, M. S.; Vizcaíno, S. F.; Iuliis, G. De; Pujos, F. (2015). "Evolution of body size in anteaters and sloths (Xenarthra, Pilosa): phylogeny, metabolism, diet and substrate preferences". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 106 (4): 289–301. Bibcode:2015EESTR.106..289T. doi: 10.1017/S1755691016000177 . hdl: 11336/56403 . ISSN   1755-6910. S2CID   90400372.
  15. ↑ Toledo, Néstor (7 September 2012). "Mass estimation of Santacrucian sloths from the Early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation of Patagonia, Argentina". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. doi: 10.4202/app.2012.0009 . hdl: 11336/20506 . ISSN   0567-7920. S2CID   59153129.
  16. ↑ Presslee, Samantha; Slater, Graham J.; Pujos, François; Forasiepi, Analía M.; Fischer, Roman; Molloy, Kelly; Mackie, Meaghan; Olsen, Jesper V.; Kramarz, Alejandro; Taglioretti, Matías; Scaglia, Fernando; Lezcano, Maximiliano; Lanata, José Luis; Southon, John; Feranec, Robert (2019). "Palaeoproteomics resolves sloth relationships". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 3 (7): 1121–1130. Bibcode:2019NatEE...3.1121P. doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0909-z. ISSN   2397-334X. PMID   31171860. S2CID   256726789.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bargo, M. Susana; Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Kay, Richard F. (12 September 2009). "Predominance of orthal masticatory movements in the Early Miocene Eucholaeops (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada, Megalonychidae) and other megatherioid sloths". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (3): 870–880. Bibcode:2009JVPal..29..870B. doi:10.1671/039.029.0324. ISSN   0272-4634.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 Kay, Richard F.; Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Bargo, M. Susana; Spradley, Jackson P.; Cuitiño, José I. (1 August 2021). "Paleoenvironments and paleoecology of the Santa Cruz Formation (early-middle Miocene) along the Río Santa Cruz, Patagonia (Argentina)". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 109: 103296. Bibcode:2021JSAES.10903296K. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103296. ISSN   0895-9811.
  19. ↑ Cuitiño, José I.; Sol Raigemborn, M.; Susana Bargo, M.; Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Muñoz, Nahuel A.; Kohn, Matthew J.; Kay, Richard F. (7 April 2021). "Insights on the controls on floodplain-dominated fluvial successions: a perspective from the Early–Middle Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Río Chalía (Patagonia, Argentina)". Journal of the Geological Society. 178 (4): jgs2020–188. Bibcode:2021JGSoc.178..188C. doi:10.1144/jgs2020-188. ISSN   0016-7649.
  20. 1 2 Vizcaíno, Sergio F.; Kay, Richard F.; Bargo, M. Susana (11 October 2012). Early Miocene Paleobiology in Patagonia: High-Latitude Paleocommunities of the Santa Cruz Formation. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-57641-3.
  21. ↑ Alvarenga, Herculano M. F.; Höfling, Elizabeth (2003). "Systematic revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes)". Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia. 43 (4): 55–91. doi:10.1590/S0031-10492003000400001. ISSN   0031-1049.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.