Del Toro had long imagined a faithful Frankenstein film as a "dream project". This was initially in development for Universal Pictures, with del Toro casting frequent collaborator Doug Jones as the Creature, and Bernie Wrightson being considered for the monster's design. However, Universal suspended the project in relation to its planned Dark Universe franchise. Netflix revived the project in 2023, with Elordi instead portraying the Creature. Filming took place from February to September 2024. Wrightson had died in 2017, and the illustrated compilation Bernie Wrightson's Frankenstein was a key inspiration for the film's look.
In 1857, the Horisont, a Royal Danish Navy ship sailing for the North Pole, is trapped in the ice. Alerted to an explosion in the distance, Captain Anderson and his men discover a gravely injured Victor Frankenstein. Upon bringing him aboard, the crew are attacked by a Creature who demands Victor's surrender. Captain Anderson uses a blunderbuss to sink the Creature into the icy water. Victor explains that he is the Creature's maker, and recounts its creation.
Part I: Victor's Tale
Victor's mother dies giving birth to his younger brother William, who becomes the favorite of their aristocratic father, a renowned surgeon. Grieving his mother and hardened by his father's abuse, Victor becomes a brilliant but arrogant surgeon, obsessed with "curing" death through science. In 1855, Victor is expelled from the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh for reanimating corpses, which a disciplinary tribunal denounces as sacrilege.
Arms merchant Henrich Harlander offers Victor unlimited funding and an isolated tower to continue his experiments. Enlisting William's assistance in building his laboratory, Victor becomes smitten with William's fiancée Elizabeth, Harlander's niece, who declines his advances.
When an impatient Harlander demands results, Victor harvests body parts from hanged criminals and soldiers killed in the ongoing Crimean War. He fashions a large creature to reanimate, preparing to harness lightning to send electric currents through the lymphatic system. As a storm approaches, Harlander reveals he is dying of syphilis and demands his brain be put into the Creature. Victor refuses, and Harlander falls to his death attempting to sabotage the experiment. Victor electrifies the Creature, but it seemingly fails to reanimate.
The following morning, Victor finds the Creature alive. Chaining it in the cellar, he marvels at the Creature's immense strength and rapid healing, but can only teach it to speak one word: "Victor." Frustrated, Victor imitates his father's cruel discipline, enraging the Creature. Arriving with William, Elizabeth questions Victor's treatment and bonds with the Creature, teaching him to speak her name. Victor lies to William that the Creature killed Harlander and sends them away, setting fire to his lab with the Creature inside. Hearing the Creature cry out his name, Victor has a change of heart and attempts to reenter the tower, but it explodes, grievously wounding his leg.
As Victor tells his story, the Creature boards the ship, confronts the captain, and reveals his side of the story.
Part II: The Creature's Tale
The Creature breaks his chains and escapes the explosion. Wandering the woods, he is shot at by hunters and later takes shelter in the mill gears of their farm. Observing the family through the walls, the Creature grows attached and secretly helps the family by providing them with large supplies of firewood and building a pen for their sheep. The family thank their unseen benefactor as the "Spirit of the Forest."
When the rest of the family leaves for the winter, the Creature befriends their blind patriarch, who teaches him to read and speak fluently. Struggling to remember his past, the Creature journeys to the ruins of the laboratory and discovers the truth about his creation, and the address to Victor's estate. He returns to the farm to find the blind man being attacked by wolves; the Creature fights them off and comforts his dying friend. The hunters return and, mistaking the Creature for the blind man's killer, shoot him dead; though he later revives.
Realizing he cannot die and will spend eternity alone, the Creature confronts Victor on the night of William and Elizabeth's wedding, asking he create a companion for him. Victor, fearing the possibility of the creature reproducing, adamantly refuses; and the Creature attacks him. Overhearing the commotion, Elizabeth arrives and embraces the creature upon seeing him. Victor attempts to shoot the Creature, but inadvertently shoots Elizabeth instead. William attempts to rush the Creature but is mortally wounded; as he dies, he calls Victor the true "monster". The Creature carries Elizabeth to a cave where she dies. Victor pursues the Creature to the Arctic. In a confrontation, the Creature attempts to destroy himself with a stick of dynamite but fails.
A remorseful Victor and the Creature reconcile, addressing each other as "father" and "son", before Victor succumbs to his injuries. The Creature uses his strength to free the ship from the ice. Captain Anderson decides to abandon his own reckless pursuit and sail back homeward. Alone, the Creature reaches out to embrace the sunlight as Victor once taught him.
Sofia Galasso as Anna-Maria, the granddaughter of the blind man and the daughter of the Young Hunter
Ralph Ineson as Professor Krempe,[7] a professor who oversees the hearing of Victor
Burn Gorman as an executioner from whom Victor obtains the remains of deceased criminals
Nikolaj Lie Kaas as Chief Officer Larsen, who attempts to persuade Captain Anderson of the crew's fading strength and morale
Production
Development
In 2007, Guillermo del Toro said that a project which he "would kill to make" would be a faithful "Miltonian tragedy" version of Mary Shelley's 1818 novel Frankenstein, citing Frank Darabont's "pretty much perfect" script for Kenneth Branagh's 1994 film Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.[8] In January 2008, he revealed that he was then in the process of crafting drawings which he hoped to use as a basis for the world of the film, and that, additionally, he had begun taking script notes but stopped once the WGA strike occurred.[9] The following month, del Toro said of his vision:
What I'm trying to do is take the myth and do something with it, but combining elements of Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein without making it just a classical myth of the monster. The best moments in my mind of Frankenstein, of the novel, are yet to be filmed [...] The only guy that has ever nailed for me the emptiness, not the tragic, not the Miltonian dimension of the monster, but the emptiness is Christopher Lee in the Hammer films, where he really looks like something obscenely alive. Boris Karloff has the tragedy element nailed down but there are so many versions, including that great screenplay by Frank Darabont that was ultimately not really filmed.[10][11]
Later that year, in September, the film was set up through del Toro's three-year first-look picture deal at Universal Pictures, alongside a slate of films he was announced to direct including Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Slaughterhouse-Five and Drood.[12] Del Toro cited Bernie Wrightson's 1983 Frankenstein illustrations as inspiration, and said the film would not be a direct adaptation of Shelley's novel, but rather "an adventure story that involves the creature."[13][14] Del Toro wanted Wrightson to design his version of the Creature.[15]
In 2009, del Toro stated that production on Frankenstein was not likely to begin for at least four years.[16] Despite this, he had already cast frequent collaborator Doug Jones in the role of the Creature and begun initiating makeup tests with the actor.[17][18] Jones later commented that the project was shelved due to Universal's future plans for their Dark Universe franchise.[19] At Comic-Con 2010, del Toro told Collider that the story was his "favorite novel in the world".[20] In 2013, del Toro expressed public interest in casting Benedict Cumberbatch for the role of the Creature.[21] In 2014, del Toro said that he would like to do versions of both Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein, and that Universal chairperson Donna Langley had approached him several times about getting it going but that he was reluctant to do so because it is his "dream project".[22]
In 2016, del Toro said of his efforts to make the film:
Frankenstein to me is the pinnacle of everything, and part of me wants to do a version of it, part of me has for more than 25 years chickened out of making it. I dream I can make the greatest Frankenstein ever, but then if you make it, you've made it. Whether it's great or not, it's done. You cannot dream about it anymore. That's the tragedy of a filmmaker. [...] You landed a 10 or you landed a 6.5 but you were at the Olympics already, and you were judged.[23]
In 2020, in an interview promoting the film Antlers (2021), del Toro stated that if he had the funding, he would make an adaptation of Frankenstein that would span two to three films due to the book's complexity and changing points of view.[24]
In 2023, the project was revived by Netflix, with whom del Toro had signed a multi-year deal to produce projects. Following the win of Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio (2022) at the 95th Academy Awards for Best Animated Feature, Variety revealed that he was set to write and direct the feature with Andrew Garfield, Oscar Isaac and Mia Goth in early talks for potential roles.[25] In September, del Toro revealed that filming was scheduled to commence in February 2024, and that Christoph Waltz had been added to the cast.[26] In January, Jacob Elordi replaced Garfield for the role of the Creature, due to scheduling conflicts that had resulted from the SAG-AFTRA strikes.[27][28] Elordi was recommended to del Toro by a hair stylist who worked with Elordi on Priscilla (2023); previously on the set of Priscilla, Elordi had joked about having been cast in Frankenstein.[29] Del Toro had spent nine months designing the look of Garfield's Creature but they were scrapped when he departed, leaving only nine weeks for him to redesign the look for the taller Elordi.[30]Felix Kammerer, Lars Mikkelsen, David Bradley, Christian Convery, and Charles Dance joined the cast in undisclosed roles. Dance previously portrayed the father of Frankenstein in the 2015 film Victor Frankenstein.[28][31] In April 2024, del Toro announced Ralph Ineson had been cast in the film in a "pivotal" cameo appearance.[32]
Del Toro explained about taking his own approach to this adaptation: "What I find beautiful is that when you create a universal myth, whether it's Frankenstein, Pinocchio, Dracula, or Sherlock Holmes, the myth itself rises so far above the original material that any interpretation is equally faithful if done with sincerity, power, and personality. If you think in terms of fidelity to the canon, you would be completely paralyzed."[33]
Oscar Isaac, who plays the lead character of Frankenstein, says the film is "this very European story, but told through a very Latin American, Mexican, Catholic point-of-view. So, it was just high passion all the time".[38]
In January 2025, Alexandre Desplat was revealed to have composed the musical score, having previously worked with del Toro on The Shape of Water (2017) and Pinocchio (2022).[39] In a May 2025 interview, Desplat said: "Guillermo's cinema is very lyrical, and my music is rather lyrical too. So I think the music of Frankenstein will be something very lyrical and emotional. I'm not trying to write horrific music."[37]
Influences
Del Toro said of his inspiration for making the movie: "It was a religion for me. Since I was a kid — I was raised very Catholic — I never quite understood the saints. And then when I saw Boris Karloff on the screen, I understood what a saint or a messiah looked like. So I've been following the creature since I was a kid, and I always waited for the movie to be done in the right conditions, both creatively in terms of achieving the scope that it needed for me to make it different, to make it at a scale that you could reconstruct the whole world."[40] Del Toro acknowledged James Whale's 1931 adaptation as a formative influence and his version draws also from its 1935 sequel Bride of Frankenstein.[41] Del Toro also cited Rebecca (1940) by Alfred Hitchcock, Wuthering Heights (1939) by William Wyler, Dragonwyck (1946) by Joseph L. Mankiewicz, and Uncle Silas (1947) by Charles Frank among his cinematic inspirations and influences.[42] During a Netflix event in Los Angeles, the first footage from the film was scored to Polish composer Wojciech Kilar's score for Francis Ford Coppola's 1992 film Bram Stoker's Dracula.[43]
The film was released in select theaters on October 17, 2025, including select screenings on 35mm and IMAX, followed by a global release on Netflix on November 7.[51] Distribution for Mexico's release in select theaters was handled by Pimienta Films.[50]
Reception
Critical response
Jacob Elordi has garnered critical praise for his performance as the Creature.
On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 85% of 363 critics' reviews are positive.The website's consensus reads: "Finding the humanity in one of cinema's most iconic monsters, Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein is a lavish epic that gets its most invigorating volts from Jacob Elordi's standout performance."[52]Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 78 out of 100, based on 58 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.[53] The film has been described as Gothic romanticism, in the vein of del Toro's own Crimson Peak (2015) or such films as Neil Jordan's Interview with the Vampire (1994) and Francis Ford Coppola's Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992).[54] It has also been an immediate inspiration for a number of cultural commentaries.[55]
Guillermo del Toro's lavish take on Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has divided critics along a spectrum of admiration. Alissa Wilkinson of The New York Times, selecting the film as a Critic's Pick, argues that del Toro's version wholeheartedly embraces the novel's profound debt to Paradise Lost while imprinting it with his signature style, transforming Shelley's literary skeleton into a distinctly del Toro tale of monstrous fathers and abandoned sons that remains faithful to the core pathos of the original text.[56] This balance between fidelity and personal vision is echoed by The Hollywood Reporter's David Rooney, who describes the film as a visually sumptuous retelling that transcends horror for grand Romantic tragedy, suggesting it hews closely to the novel's tragic spirit while achieving a new cinematic scale.[57]Empire magazine's Jamie Graham awards the film four stars out of five, calling it "an unusually faithful rendition of Mary Shelley's novel" that also functions as a boldly personal Gothic romance, stitching together Shelley's themes with del Toro's signature fairy-tale and body-horror sensibilities into a sumptuous whole.[54] In a full-throated rave, Glenn Kenny of Rogerebert.com offers a perfect score, vigorously defending the adaptation's integrity, crediting del Toro for forging something nearly new from the familiar source material by keeping "philosophically faithful to Mary Shelley's novel" even as he smartly transposes its core to a more fantastical Victorian setting, thereby expanding the humanity found in the classic story.[58] A more cautious perspective comes from The Guardian's Peter Bradshaw, who, while granting the film three stars out of five and admiring its narrative shift to the Creature's perspective—a key element of Shelley's multi-voiced novel—contends that its "luxurious, cod-period reverence" for a Victorian aesthetic ultimately sanitizes the tale's raw, philosophical horror, steering clear of the transgressive energy he finds in other interpretations.[59] This critique of adaptation choices is sharpened by Ava Elizabeth Jenkins at The Daily Tar Heel, who, in a mixed assessment, argues that specific character alterations from Shelley's blueprint—such as aging up Victor Frankenstein and reconfiguring Elizabeth's role—ultimately "undermined the source material's emotional weight," rendering key moments from the novel feeling unearned in what she still calls a "beautifully horrific interpretation."[60] Similarly, Peter Debruge of Variety notes that while del Toro's vision "hews closer to Mary Shelley's intentions" than most prior film adaptations, particularly in its empathetic exploration of creation and purpose, it ultimately buckles under its own weight, its structural choices and epic runtime diluting the novel's concentrated philosophical power.[61] The consensus frames del Toro's Frankenstein as a sweeping Gothic romance that prioritizes the novel's spiritual core over literal fidelity.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
