King James Only movement

Last updated

The First Page of the Book of Genesis in the 1611 printing of the KJV. KJVGenesispg1.gif
The First Page of the Book of Genesis in the 1611 printing of the KJV.

The King James Only movement (also known as King James Onlyism or KJV Onlyism) asserts that the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible is superior to all other English translations of the Bible. Adherents of the movement, mostly certain Conservative Anabaptist, traditionalist Anglo-Catholic, Conservative Holiness Methodist and Independent Baptist churches, believe that this text has been providentially preserved as a perfect translation of the Bible into English.

Contents

Followers of the movement assert that modern English Bible translations are corrupt, based on a distrust of the Alexandrian text-type or the critical texts of Nestle-Aland, and Westcott-Hort, sources for the majority of twentieth- and twenty-first-century translations. Instead, they prefer the Textus Receptus (which is mainly based on the Byzantine text-type, with some influences from other text-types). [1] [2] Some factions argue that the King James translation itself was divinely inspired.

Variations

Christian apologist James White has divided the King James Only movement into five main classifications: [3]

Church sign indicating that the congregation uses the Authorized King James Version of 1611 KJV 1611 Rice Baptist Church New Market Alabama 2012-06-13.jpg
Church sign indicating that the congregation uses the Authorized King James Version of 1611

These classifications are not mutually exclusive, nor are they a comprehensive summary describing those who prefer the KJV. Douglas Wilson, for instance, argues that the KJV (or, in his preferred terminology, the Authorized Version) is superior because of its manuscript tradition, its translational philosophy (with updates to the language being regularly necessary), and its ecclesiastical authority, having been created by the church and authorized for use in the church. [9]

History

Early History

The exlusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged but agreeable to the Apostles words to mark such and have no fellowship with them". [10]

The Textus Receptus and the King James Version were defended by John William Burgon (1813 – 1888) in his The Revision Revised (1881) and also by Edward Miller in A Guide to the Textual Criticism of the New Testament (1886). Burgon supported his arguments with the opinion that the Codex Alexandrinus and Codex Ephraemi were older than the Sinaiticus and the Vaticanus; and also that the Peshitta translation into Syriac (which supports the Byzantine Text) originated in the 2nd century. Miller's arguments in favour of readings in the Textus Receptus were of the same kind. [11] However, despite defending the Authorised Version and the Textus Receptus, both Burgon and Miller believed that although the Textus Receptus was to be preferred to the Alexandrian Text, it still required to be corrected in certain readings against the manuscript tradition of the Byzantine text (thus advocating the Byzantine priority theory). [12] In that judgement, they are criticised by Edward F. Hills, who argues that the principle that God provides truth through scriptural revelation also must imply that God must ensure a preserved transmission of the correct revealed text, continuing into the Reformation era of biblical translation and printing. For Hills, the task of biblical scholarship is to identify the particular line of preserved transmission through which God is acting; a line that he sees in the specific succession of manuscript copying, textual correction and printing, which culminated in the Textus Receptus and the King James Bible. Hills argues that the principle of providentially-preserved transmission guarantees that the printed Textus Receptus must be the closest text to the Greek autographs and so he rejects readings in the Byzantine Majority Text where they are not maintained in the Textus Receptus. He goes so far as to conclude that Erasmus must have been providentially guided when he introduced Latin Vulgate readings into his Greek text; [13] and even argues for the authenticity of the Comma Johanneum. [14] As to the relationship of the King James Bible to the Textus Receptus, Hills argued that the King James Version is not merely a translation of the Textus Receptus, but an independent variety of the Textus Receptus tradition. [15]

Another known defender of the King James Only movement was Benjamin G. Wilkinson (1872–1968), a Seventh-day Adventist missionary, theology professor and college president, who wrote Our Authorized Bible Vindicated (1930) in which he asserted that some of the new versions of the Bible came from manuscripts with corruptions introduced into the Septuagint by Origen and manuscripts with deletions and changes from corrupted Alexandrian text. He criticized Westcott and Hort, believing they intentionally rejected the use of the Textus Receptus and made changes to the text used in translation using their revised Greek text based mainly on the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. [16] Gail Riplinger (born 1947) has also addressed the issue of differences in current editions of the King James Bible in some detail. [17] A lengthy critical review of her book New Age Bible Versions, originally published in Cornerstone magazine in 1994, authored by Bob and Gretchen Passantino of Answers in Action, described the book as "erroneous, sensationalistic, misrepresentative, inaccurate, and logically indefensible". [18] King James Onlyism has been taught by many famous earlier Independent Baptists such as Jack Hyles (1926 – 2001), who argued that the King James Version has preserved the word of God perfectly. [19] [20] Another Independent Baptist, Jack Chick (1924–2016), who was best known for his comic tracts, advocated a King James Only position. [21] His comic Sabotage portrayed a Christian whose faith was shipwrecked by the rejection of the King James Version as the Word of God, only to be rescued by another character's defense of the King James Version. [22] During this time, a more radical form of King James Onlyism was also developed by the Independent Baptist minister Peter Ruckman (1921 – 2016), who argued that the KJV is "new revelation", superior to the original Hebrew and Greek. [8] However, in stark contrast, John R Rice (1895 – 1980), despite being an independent Baptist, in his critique of Peter Ruckman's radical form of King James Onlyism argued that the King James Version (although preferable to the American Standard Version) is not still perfect. [23]

Modern advocates

King James Onlyism is today most common in conservative Independent Baptist churches, [24] however, it is not exclusive to them. The Church Polity of the Dunkard Brethren Church, a Conservative Anabaptist denomination in the Schwarzenau Brethren tradition, states: "To aid in Scripture memorization among our members and our children, to help avoid confusion and to promote sound doctrine in our services, the Authorized King James Version of the Bible shall be used in our Sunday School, Bible Study, and church services. Exceptions may be made where languages other than English are necessary." [25] The Apostolic Christian Church, a Conservative Anabaptist denomination, uses the King James Version of the Bible. [26]

The Southern Methodist Church holds the King James Version of the Bible to be a "trustworthy standard to preach from the pulpit." [27] The 2015 Manual of the Bible Missionary Church, a Methodist denomination in the conservative holiness movement, states: "We wholeheartedly endorse the use of the Authorized Version (King James Version) of the Bible as the final authority in our English-speaking churches and schools. We also go on record as being opposed to the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, The Living Bible, the New English Translation of the Bible, the Reader's Digest Condensed Version, the New International Version and the public use of other modern versions." [28] The Immanuel Missionary Church likewise enjoins use of the King James Version of the Bible. [29] [30] The King James Version of the Bible is used exclusively by the Apostolic Faith Church, a Holiness Pentecostal denomination. [31] Agapé Boarding School in Missouri endorsed the King James Only position. One student said that when he first arrived at the school, he was strip-searched and his Bible was thrown in the trash because it was not a KJV. [32] Among others, the exclusive use of the King James Version is also endorsed by the Florida Bible College of Tampa (which has been a major institution to promote Free Grace theology), [33] [34] writing on their statement: "Although we do not believe the translators of the Authorized King James Bible were inspired, we do believe that the Authorized King James Version, based upon the Textus Receptus, is the best translation. Therefore, the Authorized King James Bible shall be the Bible used by Florida Bible College of Tampa." [35]

Some readers prefer the KJV because it is in the public domain in most countries [36] (with the UK being a notable exception). This allows them to freely copy any amount of the translation without worrying about royalties or copyright.

Other promoters of the KJV Only movement include the following organizations and individuals:

Criticism

James White has thoroughly researched the background and sources of the Bible as we have it today, and he points out the serious weaknesses of the KJV Only position, a view seemingly based more on faulty, unprovable assumptions than on solid evidence. [8]

—  Gleason Archer

One of the saddest signs of legalistic Christianity is the tenacious defense of the KJV as the only legitimate English-language translation. Almost as sad is that countless hours of scholars' and pastors' time must be diverted from the larger priorities of God's kingdom to point out the numerous historical, logical, and factual errors of KJV Onlyism — even though these errors have been repeatedly exposed in the past. Nevertheless, the job must be done, and James White does it masterfully in this book. [8]

—  Craig Blomberg

The King James Only controversy is essentially a conspiracy theory that claims that all modern translations of Scripture are based on tainted manuscripts and that their translators are driven by a liberal Protestant or Roman Catholic (or even one-world government) agenda. [57]

— Trevin Wax

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">King James Version</span> 1611 English translation of the Bible

The King James Version (KJV), also the King James Bible (KJB) and the Authorized Version (AV), is an Early Modern English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England, which was commissioned in 1604 and published in 1611, by sponsorship of King James VI and I. The 80 books of the King James Version include 39 books of the Old Testament, 14 books of Apocrypha, and the 27 books of the New Testament.

<i>Textus Receptus</i> Greek critical text of the New Testament

Textus Receptus refers to the succession of printed Greek New Testament texts starting with Erasmus' Novum Instrumentum omne (1516) and including the editions of Stephanus, Beza, Elzevir, Colinaeus and Scrivener. Additionally, although not being derived from the work of Erasmus, some such as the Trinitarian Bible Society also associate the Complutensian Polyglot with the Textus receptus tradition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bible translations</span>

The Bible has been translated into many languages from the biblical languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. As of November 2024 the whole Bible has been translated into 756 languages, the New Testament has been translated into an additional 1,726 languages, and smaller portions of the Bible have been translated into 1,274 other languages according to Wycliffe Global Alliance. Thus, at least some portions of the Bible have been translated into 3,756 languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Revised Version</span> Late 19th-century British revision of the King James Version

The Revised Version (RV) or English Revised Version (ERV) of the Bible is a late-19th-century British revision of the King James Version. It was the first officially authorised and recognised revision of the King James Version in Great Britain. The work was entrusted to over 50 scholars from various denominations in Great Britain. American scholars were invited to co-operate, by correspondence. Its New Testament was published in 1881, its Old Testament in 1885, and its Apocrypha in 1894. The best known of the translation committee members were Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort; their fiercest critics of that period were John William Burgon, George Washington Moon, and George Saintsbury.

More than 100 complete translations into English languages have been produced. Translations of Biblical books, especially passages read in the Liturgy can be traced back to the late 7th century, including translations into Old and Middle English.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New King James Version</span> English translation of the Bible

The New King James Version (NKJV) is a translation of the Bible in contemporary English. Published by Thomas Nelson, the complete NKJV was released in 1982. With regard to its textual basis, the NKJV relies on a modern critical edition for the Old Testament, while opting to use the Textus Receptus for the New Testament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reformed fundamentalism</span> Fundamentalism in the Reformed tradition

Reformed fundamentalism arose in some conservative Presbyterian, Congregationalist, Reformed Anglican, Reformed Baptist, Non-denominational and other Reformed churches, which agree with the motives and aims of broader evangelical Protestant fundamentalism. The movement was historically defined by a repudiation of liberal and modernist theology, the publication (1905–1915) entitled, The Fundamentals, and had the intent to progress and revitalise evangelical Protestantism in predominantly English-speaking Protestant countries, as well as to reform separated churches according to the Bible, historic expression of faith and the principles of the Reformation. The Fundamentalist–Modernist controversy, and the Downgrade controversy, kindled the growth and development of reformed fundamentalism in the United States and the United Kingdom. Reformed fundamentalists have laid greater emphasis on historic confessions of faith, such as the Westminster Confession of Faith.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener</span> British theologian

Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener was a New Testament textual critic and a member of the English New Testament Revision Committee which produced the Revised Version of the Bible. He was prebendary of Exeter, and vicar of Hendon.

There have been various debates concerning the proper family of biblical manuscripts and translation techniques that should be used to translate the Bible into other languages. Biblical translation has been employed since the first translations were made from the Hebrew Bible into Greek and Aramaic. Until the Late Middle Ages, the Western Church used the Latin Vulgate almost entirely while the Eastern Church, centered in Constantinople, mostly used the Greek Byzantine text. Beginning in the 14th century, there have been increasing numbers of vernacular translations into various languages. With the development of modern printing techniques, these increased enormously.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Ruckman</span> American author (1921–2016)

Peter Sturges Ruckman was an American Independent Fundamental Baptist pastor, author, and founder of the Pensacola Bible Institute in Pensacola, Florida.

Our Authorized Bible Vindicated is a book written by Seventh-day Adventist scholar Benjamin G. Wilkinson advocating the King James Only (KJO) position, published in 1930. It asserted that some of the new versions of the Bible coming out, came from manuscripts with corruptions introduced into the Septuagint with additional texts, which came to be called "Apocrypha", and manuscripts with deletions and changes from corrupted Alexandrian text brought in by manuscript readings in the Greek New Testament adopted by Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. While King-James-Only advocacy existed prior to the writing of this book, many of the arguments in the book have since become set talking-points of many who support the belief, thanks in large part to Baptist Fundamentalist preacher David Otis Fuller, who adopted them into much of his own material, such as the book, Which Bible?.

Benjamin George Wilkinson (1872–1968) was a Seventh-day Adventist missionary, educator, and theologian. He served also as Dean of Theology at the Seventh-day Adventist Washington Missionary College which is located in Takoma Park, Maryland, near Washington, D.C. Wilkinson is considered one of the originators of the King James Only beliefs.

Edward Freer Hills (1912–1981) was an American Presbyterian scholar, perhaps the most prominent 20th-century advocate of the Byzantine text-type and Textus Receptus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Textual criticism of the New Testament</span> Analysis of the manuscripts of the New Testament

Textual criticism of the New Testament is the identification of textual variants, or different versions of the New Testament, whose goals include identification of transcription errors, analysis of versions, and attempts to reconstruct the original text. Its main focus is studying the textual variants in the New Testament.

The Bible-Presbyterian Church ("BPC") was a conservative reformed denomination in Singapore. It existed from 1955 to 1988, following the history of the country, as the Bible-Presbyterian Church of Malaya, then the Bible-Presbyterian Church of Singapore and Malaysia, and finally the Bible Presbyterian Church of Singapore ("BPCOS") before the BPCOS dissolved in 1988. Since that time, Bible-Presbyterian churches in Singapore have continued to exist separately. The B-P movement grew out of the Bible Presbyterian Church in the United States. As of 2009, there were 20,000 members in 32 B–P churches in Singapore. The number of B-P churches in Singapore grew to forty-three in 2020/21 but stands at forty as of 2024

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern English Version</span> English translation of the Bible

The Modern English Version (MEV) is an English translation of the Bible begun in 2005 and completed in 2014. The work was edited by James F. Linzey, and is an update of the King James Version (KJV), re-translated from the Masoretic Text and the Textus Receptus.

In Protestant theology, verbal plenary preservation (VPP) is a doctrine concerning the nature of the Bible. While verbal plenary inspiration (VPI) applies only to the original autographs of the Bible manuscript, VPP views that, "the whole of scripture with all its words even to the jot and tittle is perfectly preserved by God in the apographs without any loss of the original words, prophecies, promises, commandments, doctrines, and truths, not only in the words of salvation, but also the words of history, geography and science; and every book, every chapter, every verse, every word, every syllable, every letter is infallibly preserved by the Lord Himself to the last iota so that the Bible is not only infallible and inerrant in the past, but also infallible and inerrant today ."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byzantine priority theory</span> Christian textual criticism theory

The Byzantine priority theory, also called the Majority Text theory, is a theory within Christian textual criticism held by a minority of textual critics. This view sees the Byzantine text-type as the New Testament's most accurate textual tradition, instead of the Alexandrian text-type or the Western text-type. Known advocates of this view include Maurice Robinson, Zane Hodges and John Burgon. The Majority Text theory is distinguished from the view of those who advocate the Textus Receptus, as although the Byzantine text is very similar to the Textus Receptus as the Textus Receptus mostly relies upon Byzantine manuscripts, it contains a few minority readings which Byzantine priorists reject.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confession of the Ethiopian Eunuch</span>

The confession of the Ethiopian eunuch is a variant reading in Acts 8:37, widely seen by Textual Critics to be a later interpolation into the text. It is found in the King James Version due to its existence within the Textus Receptus.

References

  1. ↑ F. H. A. Scrivener, A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament , (George Bell & Sons: London 1894), vol. 2, pp. 183–184.
  2. ↑ Heide, Martin (7 February 2023). "Erasmus and the Search for the Original Text of the New Testament". Text & Canon Institute. Retrieved 8 February 2024.
  3. ↑ White 1995, pp. 1–4.
  4. ↑ White 1995, p. 5.
  5. ↑ "The Majority Text and the Original Text: Are They Identical? | Bible.org". bible.org. Retrieved 24 December 2023.
  6. ↑ Watts, Malcolm H. (2007). "The Accuracy of the Authorised Version" (PDF). Quarterly Record. 578 (1). Trinitarian Bible Society: 8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 3 March 2008.
  7. ↑ "The Text of the Bible used", Principles, The Trinitarian Bible Society.
  8. 1 2 3 4 White 1995.
  9. ↑ Wilson, Douglas. "Hearers of the Word". Credenda/Agenda . 10 (1). Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 1 July 2008.
  10. ↑ Tennessee Association of Baptists. Minutes of the Tennessee Association of Baptists. Heiskell & Brown, 1817.
  11. ↑ Edward Miller, A Guide to the Textual Criticism of the New Testament (The Dean Burgon Society Press: 2003), pp. 30–37. 57–59.
  12. ↑ Heuer, Mark (1995). "An Evaluation of John W. Burgon's Use of Patristic Evidence" (PDF). The Evangelical Theological Society.
  13. ↑ Edward F. Hills, King James Version Defended!, pp. 199–200.
  14. ↑ Edward F. Hills, King James Version Defended!, pp. 209–213.
  15. ↑ Hills, Edward F (1983), The King James Version Defended, p. 171
  16. ↑ Westcott and Hort, The New Testament In The Original Greek (New York: 1882).
  17. ↑ Riplinger, Gail A. "Settings of the King James Bible" (PDF). Our KJV.
  18. ↑ New age vers. (book review), Answers, 9 August 2020
  19. ↑ "Logic Must Prove the King James Bible - The Jack Hyles Home Page". www.jackhyles.com. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
  20. ↑ Hyles, Jack. Enemies of Soul Winning.
  21. ↑ "FAQ's Concerning Bible Versions". Chick.com. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
  22. ↑ "A Critique of the King James Only Movement", James R. White, chapter in Translation that openeth the window: reflections on the history and legacy of the King James Bible. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. 2009. pp. 200–201. ISBN   978-1-58983-356-2.
  23. ↑ Teis, Josh (25 November 2019). "The History of KJV Onlyism". Josh Teis. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
  24. ↑ White, James R. (June 2009). The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust Modern Translations?. Baker Books. ISBN   978-0-7642-0605-4.
  25. ↑ Dunkard Brethren Church Polity. Dunkard Brethren Church. 1 November 2021. p. 7.
  26. ↑ "Statement of Faith". Apostolic Christian Church. Retrieved 12 August 2024.
  27. 1 2 Kurian, George Thomas; Day, Sarah Claudine (14 March 2017). The Essential Handbook of Denominations and Ministries. Baker Books. ISBN   978-1-4934-0640-1. ...and the KJV as a trustworthy standard to preach from the pulpit.
  28. 1 2 Manual of the Bible Missionary Church, Inc. Bible Missionary Church. 2015. p. 138.
  29. 1 2 Discipline of the Immanuel Missionary Church. Shoals: Immanuel Missionary Church. 1986. p. 17.
  30. 1 2 Handel, Paul S. (2024). "Can Anger Be Justified in a Sanctified Experience?". The Immanuel Missionary. 85 (2): 3.
  31. ↑ Lindsey, Joshua (11 August 2024). "Holiness Pentecostal Denominations Compared". Ready to Harvest. Retrieved 12 August 2024.
  32. ↑ Briquelet, Kate (4 July 2022). "Ex-Students Reveal Abuse at 'Christian Torture Compound'". The Daily Beast– via www.thedailybeast.com.
  33. ↑ Lazar, Shawn (10 July 2012). "The Restart of Florida Bible College Update – Grace Evangelical Society" . Retrieved 16 April 2023.
  34. ↑ "The Gospel Driven Man – Grace Evangelical Society" . Retrieved 24 April 2023.
  35. ↑ "Florida Bible College of Tampa, Inc". www.floridabiblecollege.us. Retrieved 29 September 2024.
  36. ↑ "Why do modern translations of the Bible have a copyright?". GotQuestions.org. Retrieved 15 October 2024.
  37. ↑ Lewis, James R., ed. (2001). The Encyclopedia of Cults, Sects, and New Religions (2nd ed.). Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. pp. 42–43. ISBN   978-1-57392-888-5.
  38. ↑ "Doctrinal Statement of Andersonville Theological Seminary". Andersonville Theological Seminary.
  39. ↑ "Believing Witnessing Resource Tracts". Dial-the-Truth Ministries.
  40. ↑ "What it Means to be King James Only - Pastor Steven Anderson". Strong Hold Baptist Church. 24 October 2019 – via YouTube.
  41. ↑ "Faithful Word Baptist Church – Phoenix, AZ" . Retrieved 8 July 2012.
  42. ↑ Which Bible? (3rd ed.). Grand Rapids International Publications. 1970. ISBN   0-944355-24-2.
  43. ↑ "Kent Hovind - Why KJV ONLY ??? Why not other versions?". Jeff The Watchman. 25 March 2011 – via YouTube.
  44. ↑ "QUESTION: YOU ALWAYS SEEM TO USE THE KJV BIBLE. WHY NOT USE THE MODERN TRANSLATIONS THAT ARE SO MUCH ..." The Berean Call.
  45. ↑ Enemies of Soulwinning by Jack Hyles, pp. 46–47.
  46. ↑ "What We Believe". Hyles-Anderson College.
  47. ↑ Unholy Bible Versions of the New Age.[ full citation needed ]
  48. ↑ "WHAT IS THE NEW IFB MOVEMENT?". thenewifb.com. The New IFB. Archived from the original on 21 June 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  49. ↑ "Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl - Episode 027". No Greater Joy Ministries. 22 February 2010 – via YouTube.
  50. ↑ Ruckman, Peter (1990). The Christian's Handbook of Manuscript Evidence. Pensacola: Pensacola Bible Press.
  51. 1 2 Sword of the Lord, issue from Dec 27, 2019
  52. ↑ Quarterly Record no. 578, p. 8.
  53. ↑ Unfollow: A Memoir of Loving and Leaving the Westboro Baptist Church.
  54. ↑ "WCBC Doctrinal Statement". wcbc website.
  55. ↑ Suominen, Edwin A. (26 January 2012). An Examination of the Pearl. Ed Suominen. ISBN   978-0-9851362-1-5.
  56. ↑ "Primitive Baptist Library: Why We Use the Authorized King James Version of the Bible". pblib.org. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
  57. ↑ Wax, Trevin (7 August 2007). "The King James Only Controversy". The Gospel Coalition. Retrieved 30 November 2022.

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.