Latvia and the euro

Last updated

Eurozone participation
European Union member states
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
20 in the eurozone
1 in ERM II, without an opt-out (Bulgaria)
1 in ERM II, with an opt-out (Denmark)
5 not in ERM II, but obliged to join the eurozone on meeting the convergence criteria (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Sweden)
Non-EU member states
4 using the euro with a monetary agreement (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City)
2 using the euro unilaterally (Kosovo and Montenegro)
.mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" * ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "}
.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}
v
t
e Eurozone participation.svg
Eurozone participation
European Union member states
  20 in the eurozone
  1 in ERM II, without an opt-out (Bulgaria)
  1 in ERM II, with an opt-out (Denmark)
  5 not in ERM II, but obliged to join the eurozone on meeting the convergence criteria (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Sweden)
Non–EU member states
  4 using the euro with a monetary agreement (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City)
  2 using the euro unilaterally (Kosovo and Montenegro)

Latvia replaced its previous currency, the lats, with the euro on 1 January 2014, [1] after a European Union (EU) assessment in June 2013 asserted that the country had met all convergence criteria necessary for euro adoption. The adoption process began 1 May 2004, when Latvia joined the European Union, entering the EU's Economic and Monetary Union. At the start of 2005, the lats was pegged to the euro at Ls 0.702804 = €1, and Latvia joined the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM ll), four months later on 2 May 2005. [2]

Contents

History

Latvia's Treaty of Accession to the European Union (EU) obliged it to eventually adopt the euro. Latvia had originally planned to adopt the euro on 1 January 2008, but for various reasons this was subsequently delayed several times. [3] [4] After being elected in 2011, Latvian President Andris Bērziņš announced the official goal was for Latvia to join the eurozone in 2014, saying "personally I'm very optimistic we'll join the euro on 1 January 2014. It's our goal and we are working hard to implement this process." [5] In September 2012, Latvian Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis reiterated that "Latvia is on track for 2014 and permission to join would be sought in 2013." [6] [7]

Convergence

Before Latvia could adopt the euro, it had to meet five convergence criteria set by the EU. An assessment by the European Central Bank (ECB) in April 2012 found that Latvia met three of the five criteria. The Latvian Finance Minister announced in December 2012 that since convergence checks were only conducted biennially, an extraordinary report would be requested in February 2013, [8] but in January 2013 Prime Minister Dombrovskis stated that for "technical reasons" the request had been delayed until March. However, he was confident that Latvia was "fulfilling the Maastricht euro adoption criteria with a considerable reserve, therefore I don't see any basis on which this convergence report would be negative." [9] The Latvian government formally applied for a convergence check at the beginning of March, [10] and the resulting convergence report, published on 5 June 2013 by the European Commission, concluded that "the Commission considers that Latvia fulfils the conditions for the adoption of the euro." [11] The ECB simultaneously published a report which noted that "Latvia is within the reference values of the convergence criteria". [12] Latvia's adoption of the euro, a legal obligation now that the convergence criteria have been met, was given final approval by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council on 9 July, [13] [14] [15] and the lats was replaced with the euro on 1 January 2014. [1] The Euro switchover ceremony took place at a site where Latvia's crisis began – the former headquarters of the collapsed Parex bank, now headquarters of state-owned Citatele bank, which emerged from Parex's ruins. [16]

Status

Convergence criteria
Assessment monthCountry HICP inflation rate [17] [nb 1] Excessive deficit procedure [18] Exchange rateLong-term interest rate [19] [nb 2] Compatibility of legislation
Budget deficit to GDP [20] Debt-to-GDP ratio [21] ERM II member [22] Change in rate [23] [24] [nb 3]
2012 ECB Report [nb 4] Reference valuesMax. 3.1% [nb 5]
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
None open(as of 31 March 2012)Min. 2 years
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
Max. ±15% [nb 6]
(for 2011)
Max. 5.80% [nb 7]
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
Yes [25] [26]
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
Max. 3.0%
(Fiscal year 2011) [27]
Max. 60%
(Fiscal year 2011) [27]
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia 4.1%Open6 years, 11 months0.3%5.77%No
3.5%42.6%
2013 ECB Report [nb 8] Reference valuesMax. 2.7% [nb 9]
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
None open(as of 30 Apr 2013)Min. 2 years
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
Max. ±15% [nb 6]
(for 2012)
Max. 5.5% [nb 9]
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
Yes [28] [29]
(as of 30 Apr 2013)
Max. 3.0%
(Fiscal year 2012) [30]
Max. 60%
(Fiscal year 2012) [30]
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia 1.3%Open(Closed in June 2013)8 years1.3%3.84%Yes
1.2%40.7%
  Criterion fulfilled
  Criterion potentially fulfilled: If the budget deficit exceeds the 3% limit, but is "close" to this value (the European Commission has deemed 3.5% to be close by in the past), [31] then the criteria can still potentially be fulfilled if either the deficits in the previous two years are significantly declining towards the 3% limit, or if the excessive deficit is the result of exceptional circumstances which are temporary in nature (i.e. one-off expenditures triggered by a significant economic downturn, or by the implementation of economic reforms that are expected to deliver a significant positive impact on the government's future fiscal budgets). However, even if such "special circumstances" are found to exist, additional criteria must also be met to comply with the fiscal budget criterion. [32] [33] Additionally, if the debt-to-GDP ratio exceeds 60% but is "sufficiently diminishing and approaching the reference value at a satisfactory pace" it can be deemed to be in compliance. [33]
  Criterion not fulfilled
Notes
  1. The rate of increase of the 12-month average HICP over the prior 12-month average must be no more than 1.5% larger than the unweighted arithmetic average of the similar HICP inflation rates in the 3 EU member states with the lowest HICP inflation. If any of these 3 states have a HICP rate significantly below the similarly averaged HICP rate for the eurozone (which according to ECB practice means more than 2% below), and if this low HICP rate has been primarily caused by exceptional circumstances (i.e. severe wage cuts or a strong recession), then such a state is not included in the calculation of the reference value and is replaced by the EU state with the fourth lowest HICP rate.
  2. The arithmetic average of the annual yield of 10-year government bonds as of the end of the past 12 months must be no more than 2.0% larger than the unweighted arithmetic average of the bond yields in the 3 EU member states with the lowest HICP inflation. If any of these states have bond yields which are significantly larger than the similarly averaged yield for the eurozone (which according to previous ECB reports means more than 2% above) and at the same time does not have complete funding access to financial markets (which is the case for as long as a government receives bailout funds), then such a state is not be included in the calculation of the reference value.
  3. The change in the annual average exchange rate against the euro.
  4. Reference values from the ECB convergence report of May 2012. [25]
  5. Sweden, Ireland and Slovenia were the reference states. [25]
  6. 1 2 The maximum allowed change in rate is ± 2.25% for Denmark.
  7. Sweden and Slovenia were the reference states, with Ireland excluded as an outlier. [25]
  8. Reference values from the ECB convergence report of June 2013. [28]
  9. 1 2 Sweden, Latvia and Ireland were the reference states. [28]

Failed calls for a referendum

Some members of Latvia's parliament, the Saeima, originally pushed for a referendum on euro adoption, [34] but Latvian Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis argued that a referendum is unnecessary because Latvians already voted in favour of their EU accession treaty in 2003, which binds them to adopt the euro as soon as the country is found to comply with all the convergence criteria. He argued that, given the legal obligation, a referendum could only serve to delay or prevent euro adoption. [35] According to Latvian law, if more than 1/3 of all members of parliament object to a bill, and propose an alternative bill within two weeks of the original bill being passed by parliament, a referendum can be called to allow the public to decide between the two bills. On 31 January 2013, the Latvian parliament passed its "euro adoption bill". Four days later, the biggest opposition party, Harmony Center, stated that it would not support the alternative "referendum bill", which was tabled by the other opposition party, Union of Greens and Farmers. [36] Shortly after this, on 9 February, the referendum proposal had only gathered the support of 4 out of the Saeima's 100 members. These MPs stated that they would turn to the last remaining legal option to force a referendum: gathering a petition of at least 30,000 electoral signatories. [37] Latvia officially requested an extraordinary convergence report to assess their readiness for euro adoption on 4 March 2013. [38] Latvia's Central Election Commission rejected the proposed referendum on 18 March, as the proposed bill was considered not to comply with the Latvian constitution or Latvia's international obligations. [39]

Roadmap for euro adoption

A draft law outlining the euro switchover process was presented by the government's cabinet on 6 November 2012. It specified that:

The law was passed on 31 January 2013. [9] [42]

Euro adoption dayChangeover planIntroduction [43] FrontloadingDual circulation
period
Exchange of LVL coins periodDual price displayMint companyCurrency circulated
(in units)
1 January 2014A changeover law was passed 31 Jan 2013 [9] [40] Big-BangBank and credit institutions starts receiving euro banknotes and coins 2 months before €-day.
Retailers also receive coins and banknotes ahead of €-day, between 10 and 27 Dec.2013. [44]
2 weeksPost-offices:
3 months
Banks:
6 months
Central bank:
Indefinitely
1 October 2013 until 30 June 2014 Stuttgart Mint [45] 87 million banknotes and 400 million coins [46]

Linguistic issues

Advertising on a tram using the word 'eiro' for the euro. Advertising on a Riga tram using the word 'eiro' for the euro.jpg
Advertising on a tram using the word 'eiro' for the euro.

The Latvian Parliament adopted on 26 July 2005 "Regulation Nr.564", outlining that the official Latvian name of the euro currency would be "eiro". In December 2007 the regulation was amended, so that the name in all legal matters would be "euro" and in all non-legal matters "eiro". The ECB was asked to approve this special naming convention, but declined on 13 November 2012 and asked Latvia to repeal either the entire regulation or at least the paragraph that granted the euro currency a special Latvian name. [47] On 4 March 2013, the Latvian Ministry of Justice clarified that while the official name of the currency for all financial and legal documents shall be "euro", the public will continue to be able to use the Latvian name "eiro", furthermore it is required to write "euro" in italics indicating the word is in a foreign language. [48]

Latvian euro design

Latvian euro coins feature three separate designs on the national side, [49] which were publicised in July 2006 on the home page of the National Bank of Latvia. The designs featured were the Latvian maiden, which was featured on the 5 lats coin prior to World War II, on the 1 and 2 euro coins, the greater coat of arms of Latvia on the 10, 20 and 50-cent coins, and the lesser Coat of arms of Latvia on the 1, 2 and 5-cent coins. Originally, it was planned that the Freedom Monument would be featured on the 2 euro coin, but the original design did not meet the regulations of the ECB since it reached out into the ring of the coin and changed one of the stars. Latvia decided that a changed design of the monument would not be as recognisable and decided to use the Latvian maiden, used on the 1 euro coin, on the 2 euro coin as well. [50]

For the design of images on the common side and a detailed description of the coins, see euro coins.

Depiction of Latvian euro coinage | Obverse side
€0.01€0.02€0.05
LV 1 cents.png LV 2 centi.png LV 5 centi.png
Lesser coat of arms of Latvia
€0.10€0.20€0.50
LV 10 centi.png LV 20 centi.png LV 50 centi.png
Greater coat of arms of Latvia
€1.00€2.00€2 Coin Edge
LV 1 eiro.png LV 2 eiro.png 2 eiro LV josta.jpg ( GOD BLESS LATVIA )
Latvian maiden

A tender for minting the Latvian euro coins began on 20 September 2012. [46] [51] On 10 December 2012, it was announced that Latvia will utilise the Baden-Württemberg Mint. [45] [52] The coins were minted in Stuttgart except the 1 cent, 10 cent and 1 euro coins, which were minted in Karlsruhe. The production of Latvian euros began in July 2013. [53]

Latvian Historical Regions series

YearNumberDesign
20161 Vidzeme's coat of arms
20172 Courland's coat of arms
20173 Latgale's coat of arms
20184 Semigallia's coat of arms

Circulating mintage quantities

Face Value€0.01€0.02€0.05€0.10€0.20€0.50€1.00€2.00€2.00 CCTotal
2014120,000,00080,000,00050,000,00040,000,00035,000,00025,000,00030,000,00020,000,0001,000,000401,000,000

* No coins were minted that year for that denomination
** Data not available yet
*** Small quantities minted for sets only

Mints

2014: Germany (Stuttgart): 2 cent, 5 cent, 20 cent, 50 cent, 2 euro.
2014: Germany (Karlsruhe): 1 cent, 10 cent, 1 euro.
2015-2018: Germany (Stuttgart)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euro</span> Currency of most countries in the European Union

The euro is the official currency of 20 of the 27 member states of the European Union. This group of states is officially known as the euro area or, commonly, the eurozone, and includes about 344 million citizens as of 2023. The euro is divided into 100 euro cents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eurozone</span> Area in which the euro is the official currency

The euro area, commonly called the eurozone (EZ), is a currency union of 20 member states of the European Union (EU) that have adopted the euro (€) as their primary currency and sole legal tender, and have thus fully implemented EMU policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Exchange Rate Mechanism</span> European system to reduce exchange rate variability after the Euro

The European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM II) is a system introduced by the European Economic Community on 1 January 1999 alongside the introduction of a single currency, the euro as part of the European Monetary System (EMS), to reduce exchange rate variability and achieve monetary stability in Europe.

The euro convergence criteria are the criteria European Union member states are required to meet to enter the third stage of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and adopt the euro as their currency. The four main criteria, which actually comprise five criteria as the "fiscal criterion" consists of both a "debt criterion" and a "deficit criterion", are based on Article 140 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lithuania and the euro</span> Adoption of the euro by Lithuania

Lithuania, as an EU member state, joined the eurozone by adopting the euro on 1 January 2015. This made it the last of the three Baltic states to adopt the euro, after Estonia (2011) and Latvia (2014). Before then, its currency, the litas, was pegged to the euro at 3.4528 litas to 1 euro.

The Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) is an indicator of inflation and price stability for the European Central Bank (ECB). It is a consumer price index which is compiled according to a methodology that has been harmonised across EU countries. The euro area HICP is a weighted average of price indices of member states who have adopted the euro. The primary goal of the ECB is to maintain price stability, defined as keeping the year on year increase HICP below but close to 2% for the medium term. In order to do that, the ECB can control the short-term interest rate through Eonia, the European overnight index average, which affects market expectations. The HICP is also used to assess the convergence criteria on inflation which countries must fulfill in order to adopt the euro. In the United Kingdom, the HICP is called the CPI and is used to set the inflation target of the Bank of England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Czech Republic and the euro</span>

The Czech Republic is bound to adopt the euro in the future and to join the eurozone once it has satisfied the euro convergence criteria by the Treaty of Accession since it joined the European Union (EU) in 2004. The Czech Republic is therefore a candidate for the enlargement of the eurozone and it uses the Czech koruna as its currency, regulated by the Czech National Bank, a member of the European System of Central Banks, and does not participate in European Exchange Rate Mechanism II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hungary and the euro</span> Plans since 2003 to replace the Hungarian forint with the euro

While the Hungarian government has been planning since 2003 to replace the Hungarian forint with the euro, as of 2023, there is no target date and the forint is not part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. An economic study in 2008 found that the adoption of the euro would increase foreign investment in Hungary by 30%, although current governor of the Hungarian National Bank and former Minister of the National Economy György Matolcsy said they did not want to give up the country's independence regarding corporate tax matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poland and the euro</span> Issues surrounding Poland and the Euro

Poland does not use the euro as its currency. However, under the terms of their Treaty of Accession with the European Union, all new Member States "shall participate in the Economic and Monetary Union from the date of accession as a Member State with a derogation", which means that Poland is obliged to eventually replace its currency, the złoty, with the euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bulgaria and the euro</span> Process of Bulgaria adopting the Euro

Bulgaria plans to adopt the euro and become the 21st member state of the eurozone. The Bulgarian lev has been on the currency board since 1997 through a fixed exchange rate of the lev against the Deutsche Mark and the euro. Bulgaria's target date for introduction of the euro is 1 January 2025, which would make the euro only the second national currency of the country since the lev was introduced over 140 years ago. The official exchange rate is 1.95583 lev for 1 euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romania and the euro</span> Overview of the relationship between Romania and the Euro

Romania's national currency is the leu. After Romania joined the European Union (EU) in 2007, the country became required to replace the leu with the euro once it meets all four euro convergence criteria, as stated in article 140 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. As of 2023, the only currency on the market is the leu and the euro is not yet used in shops. The Romanian leu is not part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, although Romanian authorities are working to prepare the changeover to the euro. To achieve the currency changeover, Romania must undergo at least two years of stability within the limits of the convergence criteria. The current Romanian government established a self-imposed criterion to reach a certain level of real convergence as a steering anchor to decide the appropriate target year for ERM II membership and Euro adoption. In March 2018, the National Plan for the Adoption of the Euro scheduled the date for euro adoption in Romania as 2024. Nevertheless, in early 2021, this date was postponed to 2027 or 2028, and once again to 2029 in late 2021 and then moved up to 2026.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2 euro coin</span> Highest-value euro coin

The 2 euro coin (€2) is the highest-value euro coin and has been used since the introduction of the euro in 2002. The coin is used in 22 countries with a collective population of about 341 million. The coin is made of two alloys: the inner part of nickel brass, the outer part of copper-nickel. All coins have a common reverse side and country-specific national sides. The coin has been used since 2002, with the present common side design dating from 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sweden and the euro</span> Overview of the relationship between Sweden and the euro

Sweden does not currently use the euro as its currency and has no plans to replace the existing Swedish krona in the near future. Sweden's Treaty of Accession of 1994 made it subject to the Treaty of Maastricht, which obliges states to join the eurozone once they meet the necessary conditions. Sweden maintains that joining the European Exchange Rate Mechanism II, participation in which for at least two years is a requirement for euro adoption, is voluntary, and has chosen to remain outside pending public approval by a referendum, thereby intentionally avoiding the fulfilment of the adoption requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the euro</span> Overview of the history of the euro

The euro came into existence on 1 January 1999, although it had been a goal of the European Union (EU) and its predecessors since the 1960s. After tough negotiations, the Maastricht Treaty entered into force in 1993 with the goal of creating an economic and monetary union (EMU) by 1999 for all EU states except the UK and Denmark.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom and the euro</span>

The United Kingdom did not seek to adopt the euro as its official currency for the duration of its membership of the European Union (EU), and secured an opt-out at the euro's creation via the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, wherein the Bank of England would only be a member of the European System of Central Banks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denmark and the euro</span> Overview of the relationship between Denmark and the euro

Denmark uses the krone as its currency and does not use the euro, having negotiated the right to opt out from participation under the Maastricht Treaty of 1992. In 2000, the government held a referendum on introducing the euro, which was defeated with 53.2% voting no and 46.8% voting yes. The Danish krone is part of the ERM II mechanism, so its exchange rate is tied to within 2.25% of the euro.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montenegro and the euro</span>

Montenegro is a country in South-Eastern Europe, which is neither a member of the European Union (EU) nor the Eurozone; it does not have a formal monetary agreement with the EU either. However, it is one of the two territories that has unilaterally adopted the euro in 2002 as its de facto domestic currency. This means that even though the euro is not a legal tender there, it is treated as such by the government and the population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Enlargement of the eurozone</span>

The enlargement of the eurozone is an ongoing process within the European Union (EU). All member states of the European Union, except Denmark which negotiated an opt-out from the provisions, are obliged to adopt the euro as their sole currency once they meet the criteria, which include: complying with the debt and deficit criteria outlined by the Stability and Growth Pact, keeping inflation and long-term governmental interest rates below certain reference values, stabilising their currency's exchange rate versus the euro by participating in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, and ensuring that their national laws comply with the ECB statute, ESCB statute and articles 130+131 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The obligation for EU member states to adopt the euro was first outlined by article 109.1j of the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, which became binding on all new member states by the terms of their treaties of accession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">20 euro note</span> Euro banknote

The twenty euro note (€20) is the third-lowest value euro banknote and has been used since the introduction of the euro in 2002. The note is used by the 25 countries and a population of 343 million as their sole currency, with 23 legally adopting it. In July 2023, there were approximately 4,837,000,000 twenty euro banknotes in circulation around the eurozone. It is the second most widely circulated denomination, accounting for 16.3% of the total banknotes. Estimates suggest that the average life of a twenty euro banknote is about two years before it is replaced due to wear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Croatia and the euro</span>

Croatia adopted the euro as its currency on 1 January 2023, becoming the 20th member state of the eurozone. A fixed conversion rate was set at 1 € = 7.5345 kn.

References

  1. 1 2 "Latvia becomes the 18th Member State to adopt the euro". European Commission. 31 December 2013. Retrieved 31 December 2013.
  2. "ECB: Euro central rates and compulsory intervention rates in ERM II". European Central Bank. 2 May 2005. Retrieved 1 January 2014.
  3. "Don't look for the Euro until after 2012". New Europe. 18 August 2007. Archived from the original on 23 December 2007. Retrieved 27 December 2007.
  4. "Bank targets 2013 as Latvia's 'E-day'". baltictimes.com . 26 October 2007. Retrieved 28 October 2007.
  5. Pop, Valentina (15 September 2011). "Latvia aiming to join eurozone in 2014". EU Observer. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
  6. Latvia still keen to join single currency despite euro crisis, Guardian 19 September 2012
  7. "Latvia on track to join euro in 2014, says PM". EU Observer. 22 October 2012. Retrieved 22 October 2012.
  8. "INTERVIEW: Latvia to apply to join euro zone in February 2013". Reuters Middle East. 18 December 2012. Retrieved 24 January 2013.
  9. 1 2 3 "Latvian parliament paves way to euro switch". EurActiv. 1 February 2013. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  10. "Latvia and the euro". European Commission. 5 March 2013. Retrieved 31 March 2013.
  11. "Convergence Report 2013 on Latvia". European Commission. June 2013. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
  12. "Convergence Report" (PDF). European Central Bank. June 2013. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
  13. "Press release - 3252nd Council meeting - Economic and Financial Affairs" (PDF). Council of the European Union. 9 July 2013. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
  14. "Commission: Latvia meets the conditions for adopting the euro". European Commission. 5 June 2013. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
  15. "Latvia Wins Final EU Approval to Adopt Euro on Jan. 1 Next Year". Bloomberg. 9 July 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
  16. "Latvia caps years of austerity with euro zone membership". Euronews. 1 January 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2014.
  17. "HICP (2005=100): Monthly data (12-month average rate of annual change)". Eurostat. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 6 September 2012.
  18. "The corrective arm/ Excessive Deficit Procedure". European Commission . Retrieved 2 June 2018.
  19. "Long-term interest rate statistics for EU Member States (monthly data for the average of the past year)". Eurostat. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  20. "Government deficit/surplus data". Eurostat. 22 April 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
  21. "General government gross debt (EDP concept), consolidated - annual data". Eurostat. Retrieved 2 June 2018.
  22. "ERM II – the EU's Exchange Rate Mechanism". European Commission. Retrieved 2 June 2018.
  23. "Euro/ECU exchange rates - annual data (average)". Eurostat. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
  24. "Former euro area national currencies vs. euro/ECU - annual data (average)". Eurostat. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
  25. 1 2 3 4 "Convergence Report May 2012" (PDF). European Central Bank. May 2012. Retrieved 20 January 2013.
  26. "Convergence Report - 2012" (PDF). European Commission. March 2012. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
  27. 1 2 "European economic forecast - spring 2012" (PDF). European Commission. 1 May 2012. Retrieved 1 September 2012.
  28. 1 2 3 "Convergence Report" (PDF). European Central Bank. June 2013. Retrieved 17 June 2013.
  29. "Convergence Report - 2013" (PDF). European Commission. March 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2014.
  30. 1 2 "European economic forecast - spring 2013" (PDF). European Commission. February 2013. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
  31. "Luxembourg Report prepared in accordance with Article 126(3) of the Treaty" (PDF). European Commission. 12 May 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  32. "EMI Annual Report 1994" (PDF). European Monetary Institute (EMI). April 1995. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  33. 1 2 "Progress towards convergence - November 1995 (report prepared in accordance with article 7 of the EMI statute)" (PDF). European Monetary Institute (EMI). November 1995. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  34. Duxbury, Charles (28 February 2013). "Lithuania's New Leader Says Nation Wants Euro". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 3 March 2013. However, some Latvian lawmakers recently sought a referendum on that country's move
  35. "If opposition initiates referendum on euro, Latvia will fall behind euro introduction timetable". 10 December 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  36. "Latvia's Biggest Opposition Party Won't Seek Referendum on Euro". Bloomberg L.P. 4 February 2013. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  37. "Four members calls for the suspension of the Euro Law, however, the President will enact the law" (in Latvian). Delfi.lv. 8 February 2013. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  38. "Latvia formally applies for eurozone membership". Euractiv.com. 4 March 2013. Retrieved 4 March 2013.
  39. "CEC decided not to register the proposed referendum bill about the introduction of the euro" (in Latvian). Delfi.lv. 18 March 2013. Retrieved 18 March 2013.
  40. 1 2 "Saeima adopted the euro Law". Saeima. 31 January 2013. Retrieved 16 February 2013.
  41. "Latvia on Road to Adopt Euro in 2014". Sofia News Agency. 7 November 2012. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
  42. "Introduction of the euro Law (No: 459/Lp11)". Saeima. 16 November 2012. Retrieved 30 November 2012.
  43. "Scenarios for adopting the euro". Ec.europa.eu/. Retrieved 7 September 2013.
  44. "The introduction of the euro in Latvia" (PDF). European Commission. 8 April 2014.
  45. 1 2 "Latvian euro coins Kal Germany for 5.306 million" (in Latvian). FinanceNet. 10 December 2012. Retrieved 21 December 2012.
  46. 1 2 "Bank of Latvia Announces Tender to Mint Euro Coins for Latvia". Latvia Today. 27 September 2012. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 27 October 2012.
  47. "OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK: On the spelling of the single currency (CON/2012/87)" (PDF). European Central Bank. 13 November 2012. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  48. "Society and public space will continue to be able to use the word "eiro"" (in Latvian). Latvian Ministry of Justice. 4 March 2013. Archived from the original on 12 May 2013. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  49. "The Origins of Euro Coins: Latvia". National Bank of Latvia. Archived from the original on 10 April 2009. Retrieved 12 July 2008.
  50. "Latvian Euro Coins". eiro.lv. Retrieved 25 January 2013.
  51. "Tender Regulation: On the Potential Production, Packaging and Delivery of the Latvian Euro Circulation Coins (Amended by Resolution of Minutes no.3 meeting)" (PDF). Bank of Latvia. 20 November 2012. Retrieved 30 November 2012.[ permanent dead link ]
  52. "The Design Models of the Latvian Euro Coins". Bank of Latvia. Archived from the original on 27 June 2013. Retrieved 18 July 2013.
  53. "Vācijā sākta Latvijas eiro monētu kalšana". 31 July 2013. Retrieved 23 November 2013.