This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 591 of the United States Reports :
| Case name | Docket no. | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California | 18–587 | June 18,2020 |
| The decision on the part of the Department of Homeland Security to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) was "arbitrary and capricious" in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. | ||
| Liu v. Securities and Exchange Commission | 18–1501 | June 22,2020 |
| A disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer's net profits and is awarded for victims is equitable relief permissible under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5). | ||
| Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam | 19–161 | June 25,2020 |
| The limits set by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 on review that a federal court may conduct on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(2) does not violate the Suspension Clause. | ||
| Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | 19–7 | June 29,2020 |
| The CFPB’s leadership by a single individual removable only for inefficiency, neglect, or malfeasance violates the separation of powers. | ||
| June Medical Services L. L. C. v. Russo | 18–1323 | June 29,2020 |
| The Louisiana law requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic imposes an undue burden on a woman's right to obtain an abortion. | ||
| Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society | 19–177 | June 29,2020 |
| Because plaintiffs’ foreign affiliates possess no First Amendment rights, applying the Policy Requirement to them is not unconstitutional. | ||
| Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue | 18–1195 | June 30,2020 |
| The application of the no-aid provision discriminated against religious schools and the families whose children attend or hope to attend them in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the Federal Constitution. | ||
| Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V. | 19–46 | June 30,2020 |
| A term styled “generic.com” is a generic name for a class of goods or services only if the term has that meaning to consumers. | ||
| Chiafalo v. Washington | 19–465 | July 6,2020 |
| A State may enforce an elector's pledge to support his party's nominee—and the state voters' choice—for President. | ||
| Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. | 19–631 | July 6,2020 |
| The 2015 government-debt exception of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 violates the First Amendment. | ||
| Colorado Department of State v. Baca | 19–518 | July 6,2020 |
| Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania | 19–431 | July 8,2020 |
| The Departments had the authority under the ACA to promulgate the religious and moral exemptions. The rules promulgating the exemptions are free from procedural defects. | ||
| Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru | 19–267 | July 8,2020 |
| The First Amendment ministerial exception extends to the adjudication of Morrissey-Berru's and Biel's employment-discrimination claims. | ||
| Trump v. Vance | 19–635 | July 9,2020 |
| Article II and the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution do not categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president. | ||
| Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP | 19–715 | July 9,2020 |
| The courts below did not take adequate account of the significant separation of powers concerns implicated by congressional subpoenas for the President's information. | ||
| McGirt v. Oklahoma | 18–9526 | July 9,2020 |
| For Major Crimes Act purposes, land reserved for the Creek Nation since the 19th century remains "Indian country". | ||
| Sharp v. Murphy | 17–1107 | July 9,2020 |
| Barr v. Lee | 20A8 | July 14,2020 |