Logic in China

Last updated

China is a special case in the history of logic, due to its relatively long isolation from the corresponding traditions that developed in Europe, India, and the Islamic world. In China, logical reasoning was closely connected to language, especially with respect to semantic issues and was determined by its tight relation to ethics (e.g., Mozi s.d., Jing xia, 155). Chinese logical thought neither elaborated any explicitly systematic and comprehensive formulation of the laws of reason, nor did they produce a coherent system of symbolism for abstract reasoning. Prior to the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, Chinese thinkers had rarely encountered a systematic and well-formulated logical work. Chinese logicians did not use a unique term that corresponds to the English concept of "true", nor did they focus on a distinct notion of semantic truth. However, this does not mean classical Chinese thought lacked logical depth or consistency. [1]

Contents

Mohist logic

Mozi (c. 470 – c. 391 BC), a near-contemporary of Confucius (c. 551 – c. 479 BC), is credited with founding the Mohist school, whose canons dealt with issues relating to valid inference and the conditions of correct conclusions. However, they were nonproductive and not integrated into Chinese science or mathematics. The Mohist school contained an approach to logic and argumentation that stresses rhetorical analogies over mathematical reasoning, and is based on the three fa , or methods of drawing distinctions between kinds of things. As classical Chinese philosophical logic was based on analogy rather than syllogism, fa were used as benchmarks to determine the validity of logical claims through comparison.

The School of Names, a school that grew out of Mohism, is credited by some scholars for their early investigation of formal logic.

Taoist skepticism

Although Taoist skeptics such as Zhuang Zhou agreed with the Mohist perspective about object relations regarding similarities and differences, they did not consider language to be sufficiently precise to provide a constant guide of action. [2]

Official repression of the study of logic

During the Qin dynasty, the rule of Legalism repressed the Mohist line of investigation, which has been said to have disappeared in China until the introduction of Indian philosophy and Indian logic by Buddhists. [3] A prominent scholar suggests that the version assembled for the Imperial Library of the Han dynasty would probably have been as disorganised as the current extant text, and thus would have only been 'intermittently intelligible', as it is for current readers who do not consult a critical edition. Disagreeing with Hajime Nakamura, A. C. Graham argues the school of Neo-Taoism maintained some interest in the Canons, although they may already have some of the terminology difficult to understand. [4] Before the end of the Sui dynasty, a shortened version of Mozi appeared, which appears to have replaced the Han edition. Although the original Mozi had been preserved in the Taoist,[ clarification needed ]and became known once more in the 1552 Lu edition and 1553 Tang edition, the damage was done: the dialectical chapters (as well as the military chapters) were considered incomprehensible. [5] Nevertheless, with the rise of Chinese critical textual scholarship, the book benefited from explanatory and critical commentaries: first, by Bi Yuan, and his assistant, Sun Xingyan; another commentary by Wang Chong, which has not survived; "the first special study", [6] by Zhang Huiyan; a republication of Part B by Wu Rulun. However, the summit of this late imperial scholarship, according to Graham, was the 'magnificent' commentary of Sun Yirang, which "threw open the sanctum of the Canons to all comers". [6] Graham summarises the arduous textual history of the Canons by arguing that the Canons were neglected throughout most of China's history; but he attributes this fact to "bibliographical" accidents, rather than political repression, like Nakamura. [7]

Buddhist logic

The study of logic in China was revived following the transmission of Buddhism in China, which introduced the Buddhist logical tradition that began in Indian logic. Buddhist logic has been often misunderstood by scholars of Chinese Buddhism because they lack the necessary background in Indian logic. [8]

Western logic

In 1631, Li Zhizao and Francisco Furtado published an abridged translation of a commentary on Aristotle's logic published by the University of Coimbra.

In 1886, Joseph Edkins published the Chinese translation of William Stanley Jevons's Elementary Lessons in Logic. In 1905, Yan Fu published the translation of John Stuart Mill's A System of Logic . In the early 1930s, the Department of Philosophy of Tsinghua University was the center of philosophical study. Many of the scholars at Tsinghua University at the time were strongly influenced by Bertrand Russell, who visited China in 1920.

Outside of the PRC, Hao Wang, a mathematical logician who was a close friend of Kurt Gödel, and Mou Zongsan, one of the new-Confucian scholars and a translator of Ludwig Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus were active. Inside the country, dialectical logic was actively discussed during the Cultural Revolution, while formal logic stagnated. However, in 1979, after the Cultural Revolution, the Chinese Association of Logic was established with Jin Yuelin as the first chairman and studies of mathematical logic began.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese philosophy</span> Type of philosophy

Chinese philosophy originates in the Spring and Autumn period and Warring States period, during a period known as the "Hundred Schools of Thought", which was characterized by significant intellectual and cultural developments. Although much of Chinese philosophy begun in the Warring States period, elements of Chinese philosophy have existed for several thousand years. Some can be found in the I Ching, an ancient compendium of divination, which dates back to at least 672 BCE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mohism</span> Ancient Chinese philosophy

Mohism or Moism was an ancient Chinese philosophy of ethics and logic, rational thought, and scientific technology developed by the scholars who studied under the ancient Chinese philosopher Mozi, embodied in an eponymous book: the Mozi. Among its major ethical tenets were altruism and a universal, unbiased respect and concern for all people regardless of relations or affiliations. The ideology also stressed the virtues of austerity and utilitarianism.

A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one's expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true or apparently true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in "persistent contradiction between interdependent elements" leading to a lasting "unity of opposites".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fallacy</span> Argument that uses faulty reasoning

A fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument that may appear to be well-reasoned if unnoticed. The term was introduced in the Western intellectual tradition by the Aristotelian De Sophisticis Elenchis.

Nyāya, literally meaning "justice", "rules", "method" or "judgment", is one of the six orthodox (Āstika) schools of Hindu philosophy. Nyāya's most significant contributions to Indian philosophy were systematic development of the theory of logic, methodology, and its treatises on epistemology.

The history of logic deals with the study of the development of the science of valid inference (logic). Formal logics developed in ancient times in India, China, and Greece. Greek methods, particularly Aristotelian logic as found in the Organon, found wide application and acceptance in Western science and mathematics for millennia. The Stoics, especially Chrysippus, began the development of predicate logic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mozi</span> Chinese philosopher and logician (c. 470 – c. 391 BCE)

Mozi, personal name Mo Di, was a Chinese philosopher, logician, and founder of the Mohist school of thought, making him one of the most important figures of the Warring States period. Alongside Confucianism, Mohism became the most prominent, organized schools of the Hundred Schools of Thought throughout the period. The Mozi is an anthology of writings traditionally attributed to Mozi and to his followers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School of Names</span> Ancient Chinese philosophical school

The School of Names, or School of Forms and Names, is a school of thought in Chinese philosophy that grew out of Mohist logic. Sometimes termed Logicians or Sophists modernly, Han scholars used it in reference to figures earlier termed Disputers in the Zhuangzi, as a view seemingly dating back to the Warring States period. Rather than a unified movement like the Mohists, it represents a social category of early linguistic debaters. Some arguments in later Mohist texts would appear directed at their kind of debates. Figures associated with it include Deng Xi, Yin Wen, Hui Shi, and Gongsun Long. A Three Kingdoms era figure, Xu Gan, is relevant for discussions of names and realities, but was more Confucian and less relativist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Logical reasoning</span> Process of drawing correct inferences

Logical reasoning is a mental activity that aims to arrive at a conclusion in a rigorous way. It happens in the form of inferences or arguments by starting from a set of premises and reasoning to a conclusion supported by these premises. The premises and the conclusion are propositions, i.e. true or false claims about what is the case. Together, they form an argument. Logical reasoning is norm-governed in the sense that it aims to formulate correct arguments that any rational person would find convincing. The main discipline studying logical reasoning is logic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carl Gustav Hempel</span> German writer and philosopher (1905–1997)

Carl Gustav "Peter" Hempel was a German writer, philosopher, logician, and epistemologist. He was a major figure in logical empiricism, a 20th-century movement in the philosophy of science. Hempel articulated the deductive-nomological model of scientific explanation, which was considered the "standard model" of scientific explanation during the 1950s and 1960s. He is also known for the raven paradox and Hempel's dilemma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward N. Zalta</span> American philosopher (born 1952)

Edward Nouri Zalta is an American philosopher who is a senior research scholar at the Center for the Study of Language and Information at Stanford University. He received his BA from Rice University in 1975 and his PhD from the University of Massachusetts Amherst in 1981, both in philosophy. Zalta has taught courses at Stanford University, Rice University, the University of Salzburg, and the University of Auckland. Zalta is also the Principal Editor of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

In logic, the logical form of a statement is a precisely-specified semantic version of that statement in a formal system. Informally, the logical form attempts to formalize a possibly ambiguous statement into a statement with a precise, unambiguous logical interpretation with respect to a formal system. In an ideal formal language, the meaning of a logical form can be determined unambiguously from syntax alone. Logical forms are semantic, not syntactic constructs; therefore, there may be more than one string that represents the same logical form in a given language.

<i>Huainanzi</i> 2nd-century BC Chinese treatise

The Huainanzi is an ancient Chinese text made up of essays from scholarly debates held at the court of Liu An, Prince of Huainan, before 139 BCE. Compiled as a handbook for an enlightened sovereign and his court, the work attempts to define the conditions for a perfect socio-political order, derived mainly from a perfect ruler. Including Chinese folk theories of yin and yang and Wu Xing, the Huainanzi draws on Taoist, Legalist, Confucian, and Mohist concepts, but subverts the latter three in favor of a less active ruler, as prominent in the early Han dynasty before the Emperor Wu. The work is notable as a primary evidence of Zhuangzi influence in the Han.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buddhist logico-epistemology</span> Epistemological study of Buddhism

Buddhist logico-epistemology is a term used in Western scholarship to describe Buddhist systems of pramāṇa and hetu-vidya.

The rectification of names is originally a doctrine of feudal Confucian designations and relationships, behaving accordingly to ensure social harmony. Without such accordance society would essentially crumble and "undertakings would not be completed." Mencius extended the doctrine to include questions of political legitimacy.

Deng Xi was a Chinese philosopher and rhetorician associated with the School of Names. Once a senior official of the Zheng state, and a contemporary of Confucius, he is regarded as China's earliest recorded lawyer, known for his clever use of words and language in lawsuits. The Zuo Zhuan and Annals of Lü Buwei critically credit Deng with the authorship of a penal code, the earliest known statute in Chinese criminology entitled the "Bamboo Law". This was developed to take the place of the harsh, more Confucian criminal code developed by the Zheng statesman Zichan.

State consequentialism is a modern minority theoretical interpretation of Mohist consequentialist ethics in Sinology, often intersecting with Chinese Legalism. Sinologist Fraser of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy interprets Mohist consequentialism, dating back to the 5th century BC, as the "world's earliest form of consequentialism, a remarkably sophisticated version based on a plurality of intrinsic goods taken as constitutive of human welfare". An ancient Chinese State consequentialist might evaluate the moral worth of an action based on how it contributes to the basic goods of a more particular entity: a state, with social order, material wealth, and population growth valued by both Mohists and "Legalists" like Shang Yang. The term has also been applied to the political philosophy of the Confucian philosopher Xunzi.

<i>Fa</i> (philosophy) Concept in classical Chinese philosophy

Fa is a concept in Chinese philosophy that concerns aspects of ethics, logic, and law. It can be accurately translated as 'law' in some contexts, but as a 'model' or 'standard' for behavior in most ancient texts, namely the Mozi, with prominent examples including the performance of carpentry. Although theoretically earlier, Fa comes to prominence in the Mohist school of thought. An administrative use of fa standards is prominently elaborated in Legalism, but figures in the school of names also used fa (models) for litigation. Given it's broadness, use of the term fa even included medical models (theories).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Logic</span> Study of correct reasoning

Logic is the study of correct reasoning. It includes both formal and informal logic. Formal logic is the study of deductively valid inferences or logical truths. It examines how conclusions follow from premises based on the structure of arguments alone, independent of their topic and content. Informal logic is associated with informal fallacies, critical thinking, and argumentation theory. Informal logic examines arguments expressed in natural language whereas formal logic uses formal language. When used as a countable noun, the term "a logic" refers to a specific logical formal system that articulates a proof system. Logic plays a central role in many fields, such as philosophy, mathematics, computer science, and linguistics.

<i>Mozi</i> (book) Ancient Chinese text expounding Mohism

The Mozi, also called the Mojing or the Mohist canon, is an ancient Chinese text from the Warring States period (476–221 BC) that expounds the philosophy of Mohism. It propounds such Mohist ideals as impartiality, meritocratic governance, economic growth and aversion to ostentation, and is known for its plain and simple language.

References

  1. ↑ Rošker (2022), p. 73.
  2. ↑ Willman (2023).
  3. ↑ Nakamura & Wiener (1981).
  4. ↑ Graham (1978), pp. 65–66.
  5. ↑ Graham (1978), pp. 68–70.
  6. 1 2 Graham (1978), p. 70.
  7. ↑ Graham (1978), p. 72.
  8. ↑ See Eli Franco, "Xuanzang's proof of idealism." Horin 11 (2004): 199-212.

Bibliography

  • Chmielewski, Janusz (2009). Mejor, Marek (ed.). Language and Logic in Ancient China: Collected Papers on the Chinese Language and Logic. Warsaw: Komitet Nauk Orientalistycznych PAN. ISBN   978-83-925392-4-7.
  • Fung, Yiu-ming, ed. (2020). Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic. Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy. Vol. 12. Springer. ISBN   978-3-030-29031-3. ISSN   2211-0275.
  • Graham, Angus Charles (1978). Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science. Chinese University of Hong Kong Press. ISBN   962-201-142-X.
  • Greniewski, Henryk; Wojtasiewicz, Olgierd (1956). "From the History of Chinese Logic". Studia Logica. 4 (1): 241–243. doi:10.1007/BF02548917. ISSN   0039-3215.
  • Gunn, Edward (1991). Rewriting Chinese:Style and Innovation in Twentieth-Century Prose. Stanford University Press. ISBN   978-0-8047-6622-7.
  • Hansen, Chad (1983). Language and Logic in Ancient China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN   0-472-10020-3.
  • Kurtz, Joachim (2011). The Discovery of Chinese Logic. Modern Chinese Philosophy. Vol. 1. Brill. ISBN   978-90-474-2684-4.
  • Lucas, Thierry (1993). "Hui Shih and Kung Sun Lung: an Approach from Contemporary Logic". Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 20 (2): 211–255. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.1993.tb00174.x. ISSN   0301-8121.
  • ——— (2005). "Later Mohist logic, lei, classes, and sorts". Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 32 (3): 349–365. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2005.00198.x. ISSN   0301-8121.
  • Nakamura, Hajime; Wiener, Philip P. (1981) [1964]. Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples: India–China–Tibet–Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. ISBN   0-8248-0078-8.
  • Needham, Joseph; Harbsmeier, Christoph, eds. (1998). Language and Logic. Science and Civilisation in China. Vol. VII:1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-57143-2.
  • Rošker, Jana S. (2014). "Specific Features of Chinese Logic: Analogies and the Problem of Structural Relations in Confucian and Mohist Discourses". Synthesis philosophica. 29 (1). Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo: 23–40. ISSN   0352-7875.
  • ——— (2015). "Classical Chinese Logic". Philosophy Compass. 10 (5): 301–309. doi:10.1111/phc3.12226. ISSN   1747-9991.
  • ——— (2022). Interpreting Chinese Philosophy. Bloomsbury. p. 73. ISBN   978-1-350-19990-3.
  • Willman, Marshall D. (Fall 2023) [2016]. "Logic and Language in Early Chinese Philosophy". In Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.