Megahippus

Megahippus Temporal range: 16.3–10.3  Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Barstovian to Late Clarendonian
Megahippus mckennai fossils
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Perissodactyla
Family:	Equidae
Subfamily:	† Anchitheriinae
Genus:	† Megahippus McGrew, 1938
Species
M. matthewi M. mckennai

Megahippus is an extinct genus of large Anchitheriine horses found throughout the southern portion of the United States during the middle Miocene. The animal represents one of the latest low-crowned horses, overlapping in time with more derived high-crowned horses. ^[1]

Description

Dentition

Though generally similar to other genera within the subfamily, Megahippus is unique in the presence of a well defined ridge across the inner edge of the premolars 1-3 along with the presence of large, frontward-facing lower incisors. ^[2] Unlike the incisors of other anchitheriines like Hypohippus , they would have been large and high-crowned.Between the two species, there is evidence of a trend of the animal's premolars shrinking over time with them being larger proportionally in M. mckennai. ^[3] Both Megahippus and Hypohippus show a general trend in the increase in frequency of conchets in their upper cheek teeth potentially due to the segregation of the section when compared to the earlier Anchitherium . ^[4]

Crania

Megahippus is generally comparable with other genera in the subfamily, having a short premaxilla that constricts before the first premolar. The infra-orbital fossa is located about the P4 with the facial fossa positioned above and behind the infra-orbital fossa. The placement of the facial fossa more similar to the more basal Archaeohippus than the closely related Hypohippus. ^[3]

Postcrania

The limb morphology of Megahippus is similar to those seen in living equines, having adaptations towards the restricted movement of the fetlock. Thought this seems to be a convergent adaption related to the support of larger body masses. The ungual of larger anchitheriins like Megahippus was also similar to Equus which would have given the animal a more rounded phalanx then smaller smaller genera. ^{[5] [6]} Unlike modern horses, the feet of Megahippus and other anchitheriins were tridactyl. ^[7] The estimated body masses of the species of the genus are 194.9 kg for M. mckennai and 266.2 kg for M. matthewi. ^[8]

Paleobiology

Based on wear and morphology seen in the incisors of Megahippus, this animal was a more specialized browser than other genera. ^[9] During the time that the animal lived, the number of equid species in North America had massively decreased with only a few species being found throughout the continent and these species not being many numerous in their ecosystems. ^[10]

References

1. Radinsky, Leonard (1984). "Ontogeny and Phylogeny in Horse Skull Evolution" . Evolution. 38 (1): 1–15. doi:10.2307/2408541. ISSN   0014-3820. JSTOR   2408541.
2. Stirton, R. A. (1941). "Development of Characters in Horse Teeth and the Dental Nomenclature" . Journal of Mammalogy. 22 (4): 434–446. doi:10.2307/1374940. ISSN   0022-2372. JSTOR   1374940.
3. Tedford, Richard F.; Alf, Raymond M. (1962). "A NEW MEGAHIPPUS FROM THE BARSTOW FORMATION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA". California. Bulletin, Southern California Academy of Sciences. 61 (2): 113–122.
4. Forsten, Ann (1973). "The Evolution of Some Morphological Characters of the Upper Cheek Teeth of the Fossil Horses" . Evolution. 27 (1): 36–43. doi:10.2307/2407117. ISSN   0014-3820. JSTOR   2407117.
5. Janis, Christine M.; Bernor, Raymond L. (2019-04-12). "The Evolution of Equid Monodactyly: A Review Including a New Hypothesis". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 7. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00119 . hdl: 1983/ede09e37-96f7-4baf-aec5-1bb7766a04e7 . ISSN   2296-701X.
6. "Hipparion tracks and horses' toes: the evolution of the equid single hoof" . Royal Society Open Science. 10 (6). 2023. doi:10.1098/rsos.230358/v1/review1.
7. Argand, Alian (January 1994). "Fossil horses. Systematics, paleobiology and evolution of the family equidae" . Geobios. 27 (6): 768. Bibcode:1994Geobi..27..768A. doi:10.1016/s0016-6995(94)80061-8. ISSN   0016-6995.
8. MacFadden, Bruce J. (1986). "Fossil horses from "Eohippus" (Hyracotherium) to Equus: scaling, Cope's Law, and the evolution of body size" . Paleobiology. 12 (4): 355–369. doi:10.1017/s0094837300003109. ISSN   0094-8373.
9. Semprebon, Gina M.; Rivals, Florent; Solounias, Nikos; Hulbert, Richard C. (2016). "Paleodietary reconstruction of fossil horses from the Eocene through Pleistocene of North America" . Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 442: 110–127. Bibcode:2016PPP...442..110S. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.11.004. ISSN   0031-0182.
10. Hulbert, Richard C. (1993). "Taxonomic evolution in North American Neogene horses (subfamily Equinae): the rise and fall of an adaptive radiation" . Paleobiology. 19 (2): 216–234. Bibcode:1993Pbio...19..216H. doi:10.1017/s0094837300015888. ISSN   0094-8373.