Temple Mount Sifting Project

Last updated

Temple Mount Sifting Project, The Masu'ot Lookout Temple Mount Sifting Project.jpg
Temple Mount Sifting Project, The Masu'ot Lookout

The Temple Mount Sifting Project (TMSP; formerly known as the Temple Mount Salvage Operation) is an archaeological project begun in 2004 whose aim is the recovery and study of archaeological artifacts contained within debris which were removed from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem without proper archaeological care.

Contents

Students participating in the sifting, ca. 2005 PikiWiki Israel 38192 Archaeological Sifting of Debris from the Temple M.jpg
Students participating in the sifting, ca. 2005

The project sifting facility was located until 2017 in Emek Tzurim National Park. In June 2019 it moved to the Masu’ot Lookout at Mt. Scopus.

History

Despite its historical importance, no archaeologist has ever been able to carry out a systematic excavation on the Temple Mount. This was the state of affairs, when in November 1999 approximately 9,000 tons of archaeologically rich soil were removed from the Temple Mount by the Waqf , using heavy earth moving equipment and without a preceding salvage excavation or proper archaeological care, following works in and around the newly constructed underground el-Marwani Mosque. [1]

The debris was moved to several locations, with the lion's share (an estimated 350 truckloads) dumped in the Kidron Valley, near the north-eastern corner of the old city. These soil heaps were inspected and sampled by Israel Antiquities Authority officials, but no full-scale excavation ensued. [2]

In 2004, an excavation permit was issued to Israeli archaeologists Gabriel Barkay and Zachi Dvira (Zweig), under the auspices of Bar-Ilan University, who, with funding from private backers through the Israel Exploration Society, proceeded to retrieve most of the heaps of soil and move them to a secure location provided by the Israel Nature and Parks Authority in the Emek Tzurim National Park.

In 2005, after experiencing financial difficulties, the project collaborated with the Ir-David foundation, who took responsibility on the administration of the sifting site, while the scientific oversight retained by Barkay and Dvira. Over the years, in addition to its scientific mission, the project took on an educational and touristic character as well, drawing hundreds of thousands of volunteers and tourists who briefly joined the sifting activity, supervised by staff members.

in April 2017, the Sifting Project withdrew its partnership with the Ir David Foundation and discontinued active sifting, focusing instead on laboratory research of artifacts already recovered. [3] The Sifting Project has held several Crowdfunding campaigns, and as of December 2018, has enough funds to keep afloat, but not enough to complete all research [4] nor to resume the sifting, which has continued sporadically, [5] and a public commitment by the former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to provide government backing for the Project, [6] has yet to bear fruit. [7] The Ir David Foundation retains the former sifting site of the project in Emek Tzurim and runs there an "Archaeological Experience", where visitors sift soil from various excavations in Jerusalem. Active sifting of Temple Mount soil resumed in June 2019, in a new site atop Mount Scopus. [8] [9]

Methodology

Sifting22.jpg

Unable to apply traditional excavation techniques to the disturbed soil, the project founders opted to sift the entirety of the soil retrieved from the dumping grounds. At the sifting site, the soil was dry-sifted and transferred into buckets, where it was left to soak. The remaining soil was then washed off over a wire mesh, and archaeological artifacts hand-picked from among remaining stones and modern refuse. This process was mostly undertaken by volunteers and tourists, under supervision of experienced staff. Objects retrieved from the wet-sifting process are then sorted and cataloged by on-site archaeologists, and transferred to an archaeological laboratory, to be further studied by specialists who prepare the finds for publication. Much like an archaeological survey, the types of finds are categorized, counted and compared to different types both within the site and in nearby sites. [10]

Prior to the onset of the TMSP, the wet-sifting technique, in which significant portions of the site's soil (as opposed to selected loci) are water-screened, was used by local archaeologists only in some prehistoric sites. This led to a problem in comparing finds from the Temple Mount to other sites. For example, while comparison to other Iron Age Judahite sites showed a similar distribution of different types of figurines (human, animal, etc.), [11] the percentage of fragments was incomparable – more leg fragments were recovered by the TMSP than all other sites combined, and horn\ear fragments were reported solely by the TMSP. [12] This is not to say that such fragment did not exist in other sites, but rather, that their small size caused them to remain unnoticed by archaeologists excavating in traditional methods.

To overcome this sampling bias, samples were taken from various excavation sites in Jerusalem and subjected to wet-sifting to act as a control group. [13] In the ensuing years, multiple excavation projects in Jerusalem and its environs have adopted the wet-sifting technique, [14] some of them outsourcing the sifting work to the TMSP. [15] The rising popularity of the wet-sifting technique has correlated to a notable rise in the number of seal and seal impressions discovered in excavations carried out in Jerusalem. [16]

In January 2013, the project announced the development of a statistical method using cluster analysis to partially reconstruct the original context of some of the finds. [17] Later that year, it was announced that enough artifacts had been collected to serve as a representative sample, and common finds collected from that point forward will not be included in the final publication. [18]

Finds

Most of the artifacts discovered are quite small, no larger than a few centimeters. Their origins span several millennia – from the Stone Age up to the 20th century.

Stone and Bronze Ages

Examples of common finds, early periods. TM Sifting Project 05.jpg
Examples of common finds, early periods.

Only a tiny fraction of the finds date to these periods, the earliest among them dated to the Epipalaeolithic or the Neolithic Period. [19] The Chalcolithic and Bronze Ages are mostly represented by sherds of local pottery, but some examples of Mycenaean pottery have been found as well. [20] Other finds from these periods include 3 Bronze Age scarabs [21] and an amulet bearing the name of Thutmose III. [22] A broken finger of a statue probably dates to the Late Bronze Age. [23]

Iron Age (First Temple Period, 1000–586 BCE)

Approximately 15% of the pottery finds in the TMSP date to the Iron Age, mostly to the Iron Age IIb-III (800–586 BCE). [24]

Among the finds from the Iron Age IIa (10th–9th century BCE) are a rare impression seal [25] and an arrowhead. [26]

The later Iron Age is well represented in the finds: About 130 typical Judahite figurine fragments have been recovered from the Temple Mount soil, and another 30 from an ancient garbage dump in the Eastern Slopes of the Temple Mount. [27] Other finds include Judean stone weights, weaponry –including a rare arrowhead of the Scytho-Iranian type –introduced to Jerusalem by the forces of Nebuchadnezzar II, and inscription bearing artifacts, including a LMLK seal, dozens of ostraca and several seals and sealing (bullae), the most prominent among them being the Immer Bulla, a broken sealing, paleographically dated to the 7th–6th century BCE and bearing the incomplete given name ...lyahu and the patronym Immer, the name of a well known Biblical priestly family, of which one member is recorded as a major office holder in the Temple. [28] The sealing, which bears on its back fiber impressions, was affixed to a cloth sack, pouch, or lid, possibly relating to the Temple treasury. [29]

The Immer bulla Imer bulla.JPG
The Immer bulla

Second Temple Period (516 BCE – 70 CE)

Herodian and other Opus Sectile tile patterns presented by Gabriel Barkay (leaning) to Moshe Ya'alon (left) Gabriel Barkay with Moshe Ya'alon.jpg
Herodian and other Opus Sectile tile patterns presented by Gabriel Barkay (leaning) to Moshe Ya'alon (left)

Within the Temple Mount's history, no other period saw as much activity as the Second Temple period – both in terms of construction projects carried out, chiefly that of Herod's temple, and in volume of people going about their day-to-day activity. This is well attested in the pottery finds of the TMSP, over 40% of which date to this period (⅔ of that dating between Herod's reign (37 BCE) and the Destruction of the temple (70 CE)).

A number of architectural remains are ascribed to this period, the largest among them being a 75 cm wide Doric capital, which may have topped an 18-foot tall column within Solomon's Porch. [30] Another noted architectural discovery consisted of dozens of multi-colored Opus sectile tiles of various shapes, which enabled a reconstruction of the tiling patterns employed in the courtyards of Herod's Temple. [31]

More than 500 of the coins discovered in the sifting date to this period, spanning from the 6th century BCE Yehud coinage till the First Jewish Revolt coinage of the year 70 CE.

Other finds of the period include hundreds of fragments of stone vessels typical to late 2nd Temple Judea, over a thousand fresco fragments, weaponry and epigraphic finds. [32]

Byzantine Period (324–638)

Examples of common finds, Classical-Medieval Periods. TM Sifting Project 06.jpg
Examples of common finds, Classical-Medieval Periods.

A full third of all the coins found date to this period, along with large amounts of pottery. A relatively surprising phenomena was the discovery of a large number of luxurious architectural artifacts from the period – including Opus sectile tiles, roof tiles, Corinthian capitals, chancel screens and a multitude of mosaic tesserae – which led researchers to question the historical sources that depict the Temple Mount as abandoned at the time. Additional finds include cruciform pendants, clay oil lamps emblazoned with crosses and bronze weights.

Early Islamic Period (638–1099)

Approximately one in four pottery fragments recovered by the TMSP date to this period, mostly consisting of Umayyad tableware and storage vessels, and Abbasid tableware, storage and cooking vessels.

Other finds include many architectural elements connected to the construction of the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque, the most prominent being thousands of colored and gilded mosaic tesserae belonging to wall mosaics, most likely the mosaics akin to those adorning the inner walls of the dome of the rock, which adorned the outer walls till their replacement by glazed tiles in the 16th century. [33]

Crusader Period (1099–1187)

During this period, the use of the sub-floor structure of the Temple Mount as a stable by the Knights Templar gave Solomon's Stables its current name. This is reflected in finds such as hundreds of armor scales, horseshoe nails, and arrowheads. Over a hundred silver Crusader coins make up the biggest and most varied collection of such coins from Jerusalem. [34] Opus Sectile tiles from this era match up exactly to patterns seen under the Dome of the Rock's carpeting, [35] as well as the church of the Holy Sepulchre. [36]

Mamluk and Ottoman periods (1260–1917)

Examples of common finds, later periods. TM Sifting Project 07.jpg
Examples of common finds, later periods.

The Mamluk period is represented mainly by pottery, coins, gaming pieces, jewelry and some architectural elements.

A large variety of finds date to the Ottoman Period, including finds related to renovation projects undergone during this era, such as glazed tiles which have coated the outer walls of the Dome of the Rock since the 16th century, and fragments of colorful Stained Glass Windows.

Over a dozen personal seals dating to this period were found, including one bearing the name of Sheikh Abd al-Fattah al-Tamimi, [37] who would go on to serve as deputy to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, and Qadi in Ramla, Gaza and Nablus in the early 18th century.

Hundreds of clay pipes, and various types of weaponry, including gunflints, and lead and iron bullets and shells.

A large amount of glass bracelet and anklets span both the Mamluk and Ottoman Periods.

World War I and onward (1917–1999)

Many modern artifacts were found, including mainly pottery such as porcelain and Marseilles tiles, modern coinage, prayer rugs and clothing accessories including military insignia and weaponry of various military forces.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">City of David (archaeological site)</span> Archaeological site thought to constitute the core settlement of ancient Jerusalem

The City of David, known locally mostly as Wadi Hilweh, is the name given to an archaeological site considered by most scholars to be the original settlement core of Jerusalem during the Bronze and Iron Ages. It is situated on southern part of the eastern ridge of ancient Jerusalem, west of the Kidron Valley and east of the Tyropoeon Valley, to the immediate south of the Temple Mount.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tel Lachish</span> Biblical city and an archeological site in Israel

Lachish was an ancient Israelite city in the Shephelah region of Canaan on the south bank of the Lakhish River mentioned several times in the Hebrew Bible. The current tell by that name, known as Tel Lachish or Tell el-Duweir, has been identified with Lachish. Today, it is an Israeli national park operated and maintained by the Israel Nature and Parks Authority. It lies near the present-day moshav of Lakhish, which was named in honor of the ancient city.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeology of Israel</span> Archaeological studies of Israel

The archaeology of Israel is the study of the archaeology of the present-day Israel, stretching from prehistory through three millennia of documented history. The ancient Land of Israel was a geographical bridge between the political and cultural centers of Mesopotamia and Egypt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Committee for the Prevention of Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple Mount</span> Archeological group in Israel

The Committee for the Prevention of Destruction of Antiquities on the Temple Mount is a group of archaeologists, intellectuals and other prominent individuals in Israel formed in response to concerns about damage to antiquities from excavations at the Temple Mount and alleged attempts by the Jerusalem Waqf to remove archaeological evidence of a Jewish Temple at the Temple Mount.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tel Hazor</span> Archeological site of an ancient city in Israel

Tel Hazor, also Chatsôr, translated in LXX as Hasōr, named in Arabic Tell Waqqas / Tell Qedah el-Gul, is an archaeological tell at the site of ancient Hazor, located in Israel, Upper Galilee, north of the Sea of Galilee, in the northern Korazim Plateau. From the Middle Bronze Age to the Iron Age, Hazor was the largest fortified city in the region and one of the most important in the Fertile Crescent. It maintained commercial ties with Babylon and Syria, and imported large quantities of tin for the bronze industry. In the Book of Joshua, Hazor is described as "the head of all those kingdoms". Though scholars largely do not consider the Book of Joshua to be historically accurate, archaeological excavations have emphasized the city's importance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Large Stone Structure</span> Ancient structure in Jerusalem, attributed to King David

The Large Stone Structure is the name given to a set of remains interpreted by the excavator, Israeli archaeologist Eilat Mazar, as being part of a single large public building in the City of David, presumably the oldest settlement core of Jerusalem. Mazar tentatively dated the findings to the tenth to ninth century BCE. Mazar chose this particular name for the alleged structure because of its proximity to another site known as the Stepped Stone Structure. Mazar announced the discovery on 4 August 2005, and stated that she believed it may be the remains of King David's palace as recorded in the Books of Samuel. The interpretation of the remains as those of one single building, the suggested date, and the association with King David have all been challenged by other well-known archaeologists. The archaeological dig was funded privately by Roger Hertog, an American banker.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eilat Mazar</span> Israeli archaeologist (1956–2021)

Eilat Mazar was an Israeli archaeologist. She specialized in Jerusalem and Phoenician archaeology. She was also a key person in Biblical archaeology noted for her discovery of the Large Stone Structure, which she surmised to be the palace of King David.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Ussishkin</span> Israeli archaeologist

David Ussishkin is an Israeli archaeologist and professor emeritus of archaeology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solomon's Stables</span> Islamic prayer hall in the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound

Solomon's Stables, or Al-Marwani Mosque, is an underground vaulted prayer hall in the Al-Aqsa mosque compound in Jerusalem. It is 600 square yards in area, and is located under the southeastern corner of the compound, 12.5 m (41 ft) below the courtyard, and features twelve rows of pillars and arches. In December 1996 the Jerusalem Waqf renovated the area. The area was known to the Crusaders as Solomon's Stables, and to earlier Muslims as the Old Mosque.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Levantine archaeology</span> Archaeological study of the Levant

Levantine archaeology is the archaeological study of the Levant. It is also known as Syro-Palestinian archaeology or Palestinian archaeology. Besides its importance to the discipline of Biblical archaeology, the Levant is highly important when forming an understanding of the history of the earliest peoples of the Stone Age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gabriel Barkay</span> Israeli archaeologist

Gabriel Barkay is an Israeli archaeologist.

<i>Ophel</i> Biblical Hebrew term for urban elevation

Ophel is the biblical term given to a certain part of a settlement or city that is elevated from its surroundings, and probably means fortified hill or risen area. In the Hebrew Bible, the term is used about two cities: Jerusalem, as in 2 Chronicles 27:3 and 33:14 and Nehemiah 3:26 and 11:21, and Samaria, mentioned in 2 Kings 5:24. The Mesha Stele, written in Moabite, a Canaanite language closely related to Biblical Hebrew, is the only extra-biblical source using the word, also in connection to a fortified place.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Excavations at the Temple Mount</span> Archaeology of a Jerusalem holy site

A number of archaeological excavations at the Temple Mount—a celebrated and contentious religious site in the Old City of Jerusalem—have taken place over the last 150 years. Excavations in the area represent one of the more sensitive areas of all archaeological excavations in Jerusalem.

Ir David Foundation or City of David Foundation, commonly known as Elad [El'ad] is a Jerusalem-based, Israeli settler association which aims to strengthen the Jewish connection to Jerusalem, and renew the Jewish community in the City of David, which is also part of the neighborhood of Silwan. The foundation works to achieve its goals by tourism, education, archaeological excavations and obtaining homes in the area to establish a Jewish presence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zachi Dvira</span> Israeli archaeologist

Zachi (Yitzhak) Dvira is an Israeli archaeologist. He co-directs the Temple Mount Sifting Project and was the first person to recognize the archaeological importance of the debris removed from Temple Mount. He initiated a project for systematic sifting of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emek Tzurim National Park</span> Israeli national park located in occupied East Jerusalem

Emek Tzurim National Park is a national park in East Jerusalem.

Tel Motza or Tel Moẓa is an archaeological site in Motza, on the outskirts of Jerusalem. It includes the remains of a large Neolithic settlement dated to around 8600–8200 BCE, and Iron Age Israelite settlement dating to around 1000 to 500 BCE and identified with the biblical Mozah mentioned in the Book of Joshua. In 2012, Israeli archaeologists announced the discovery of a temple from the Iron Age IIA levels at Motza, contemporary with the First Temple in Jerusalem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeological remnants of the Jerusalem Temple</span>

Several kinds of archaeological remnants of the Jerusalem Temple exist. Those for what is customarily called Solomon's Temple are indirect and some are challenged. There is extensive physical evidence for the temple called the Second Temple that was built by returning exiles around 516 BCE and stood until its destruction by Rome in the year 70 CE. There is limited physical evidence of Solomon's Temple, although it is still widely accepted to have existed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tel Yokneam</span>

Tel Yokneam, also spelled Yoqne'am or Jokneam, is an archaeological site located in the northern part of the modern city of Yokneam Illit, Israel. It is known in Arabic as Tell Qamun, believed to be a corruption of the Hebrew name. The site is an elevated mound, or tell, spanning around 40 dunams and rising steeply to a height of 60 meters (200 ft). With a few brief interruptions, Yokneam was occupied for 4,000 years, from the Middle Bronze Age to the Ottoman period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ketef Hinnom scrolls</span> Archaeological artefact

The Ketef Hinnom scrolls, also described as Ketef Hinnom amulets, are the oldest surviving texts currently known from the Hebrew Bible, dated to c. 600 BCE. The text, written in the Paleo-Hebrew script, is from the Book of Numbers in the Hebrew Bible, and has been described as "one of the most significant discoveries ever made" for biblical studies.

References

  1. ↑ Seligman, Jon (January 2007). "Solomon's Stables, The Temple Mount, Jerusalem: The Events Concerning the Destruction of Antiquities 1999–2001". Atiqot. 56: 33*–54*.; Yitzkak Reiter and John Seligman "1917 to the Present: AL-Haram al-Sharif / Temple Mount (Har ha-Bayit) and the Western Wall", in: Oleg Grabar & Benjamin Z. Kedar (eds.), Where Heaven and Earth Meet: Jerusalem's Sacred Esplanade, Jerusalem, 2009, pp. 268–270.
  2. ↑ Baruch, Yuval. "Report on the Archaeological Finds in the Soil Debris Removed from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, 1999, 2000". Atiqot. 56: 55*–64*.
  3. ↑ Approximately 70% of the debris was had been sifted at this time. "Is this the End of the Sifting Project?". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 2 April 2017. Retrieved 12 December 2018.
  4. ↑ "half-shekel.org" . Retrieved 12 December 2018.
  5. ↑ "Our New Mobile Sifting Program". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 17 May 2018. Retrieved 6 December 2018.; Borschel-Dan, Amanda (17 May 2018). "Archaeologist for a day: Find Temple Mount treasures – at a school near you". Times of Israel . Retrieved 12 December 2018.
  6. ↑ Hoffman, Carl (20 July 2017). "Temple Mount Sifting Project at a Crossroads". The Jerusalem Post . Retrieved 6 December 2018.; Hasson, Nir (21 October 2016). "Amid UNESCO Flap, Israel Will Sponsor Rightist NGO's Temple Mount Project". Haaretz . Retrieved 12 December 2018.
  7. ↑ Dvira, Zachi; Barkay, Gabriel (10 August 2018). "Thank You!". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  8. ↑ "Two Important Announcements". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 7 April 2019. Retrieved 10 April 2019.
  9. ↑ Karabelnicoff, Shaked (3 June 2019). "Temple Mount Sifting Project Relaunches For Jerusalem Day". The Jerusalem Post . Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  10. ↑ Relics in Rubble, pp. 47–48; New Data in the Sifting Project of Soil from the Temple Mount: Second Preliminary Report, pp. 29–30.
  11. ↑ Iron Age II Figurine Fragments from the Temple Mount Soil, p. 139.
  12. ↑ Iron Age II Figurine Fragments from the Temple Mount Soil, pp. 134, 138.
  13. ↑ The Temple Mount Sifting Project: Preliminary Report 3, p. 52; Secondary Refuse Aggregates from the First and Second Temple Periods on the Eastern Slope of the Temple Mount, pp. 63–106.
  14. ↑ e.g.: Reich, R., Shukron, E., and Lernau, O. "Recent discoveries in the City of David, Jerusalem", Israel Exploration Journal 57:2 (2007), p. 154; Guy Bar-Oz et al., "Holy Garbage": a quantitative study of the city-dump of Early Roman Jerusalem, Levant , 39:1 (2007), p. 4.
  15. ↑ e.g. Eilat Mazar, Ophel excavations to the south of the Temple Mount, 2009–2013 : final reports : volume I, p. xvii; Eilat Maza et al. "A Cuneiform Tablet from the Ophel in Jerusalem", Israel Exploration Journal 60(1), Jerusalem, 2010, p. 4.
  16. ↑ Relics in Rubble, p. 48.
  17. ↑ "Reconstructing the Context of Our Frequent Finds – The Temple Mount Sifting Project". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 7 February 2013. Retrieved 12 December 2018.
  18. ↑ "The End of the Sifting for the Prevalent Finds – The Temple Mount Sifting Project". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 12 December 2018.
  19. ↑ 3rd report, p. 67.
  20. ↑ "Mycenaean Imports Early in Jerusalem's History". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 17 January 2018. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  21. ↑ 2nd report, pp. 36–37; 3rd report, pp. 67–68.
  22. ↑ Mendlowitz, Ariella (20 April 2016). "3,200 Year Old Egyptian Amulet Discovered in Temple Mount 'Trash'". Breaking Israel News | Latest News. Biblical Perspective. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  23. ↑ Eisenbud, Daniel K. (9 April 2017). "Temple Mount Sifting Project Finds Finger From Ancient Egyptain Statue". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 6 December 2018.
  24. ↑ Relics in Rubble, p. 50.
  25. ↑ Ben Zion, Ilan (24 September 2015). "Tiny stone seal from King David era found in Temple Mount fill". Times of Israel. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  26. ↑ "Special Media Release: Rare 3,000-Year-Old Seal Discovered within Earth Discarded from Temple Mount". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 24 September 2015. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  27. ↑ Iron Age II Figurine Fragments from the Temple Mount Soil, p. 42.
  28. ↑ Jeremiah 20:1
  29. ↑ Relics in Rubble, pp. 50–52.
  30. ↑ "The Doric Survivor". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 20 July 2017. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  31. ↑ Barkay, G., Dvira, Z. 2016. and Snyder, F., What the Temple Mount Floor Looked Like. Biblical Archaeology Review 42:06. Nov/Dec 2016. pp. 56–59. For media coverage see, e.g., Eisenbud, Daniel K. (6 September 2016). "Archaeologists Restore Tiles from Second Temple in Jerusalem". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 11 December 2018.; Waldek, Stefanie (7 September 2016). "Archaeologists Restore the Tile Floor at Jerusalem's Temple Mount". Architectural Digest . Retrieved 11 December 2018.; "Jerusalem Biblical Temple floor designs 'restored'". BBC News. 6 September 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  32. ↑ Relics from Rubble, pp. 52–54.
  33. ↑ 3rd Report, pp. 63, 78–79.
  34. ↑ Relics in Rubble, p. 55
  35. ↑ "A Brief Report about Carpets Replacements and the Floors in the Dome of the Rock". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 24 April 2015. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  36. ↑ "Reconstruction of Crusader Floors in the Dome of the Rock Based on Picturesque Palestine Illustrations and Finds from the Temple Mount Sifting Project". The Temple Mount Sifting Project. 22 December 2015. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
  37. ↑ Relics in Rubble, p. 55; Dvira, Zachi (15 October 2016). "Archaeology 101: An Archaeology Lesson to UNESCO". Times of Israel. Retrieved 11 December 2018.

Further reading

TMSP publications

Other publications

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.