Trigonotarbida

Last updated

Trigonotarbida
Temporal range: Pridoli–Sakmarian
20201208 Trigonotarbida trigonotarbid.png
Palaeocharinus rhyniensis, Eophrynus prestvicii, Trigonotarbus johnsoni and Maiocercus celticus
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order:† Trigonotarbida
Petrunkevitch, 1949
Families
Synonyms
  • Anthracomarti Karsch, 1882
  • Meridogastra Thorell & Lindström, 1885
  • Eurymarti Matthew, 1895

The order Trigonotarbida is a group of extinct arachnids whose fossil record extends from the late Silurian to the early Permian (Pridoli to Sakmarian). [1] [2] [3] These animals are known from several localities in Europe and North America, as well as a single record from Argentina. Trigonotarbids can be envisaged as spider-like arachnids, but without silk-producing spinnerets. They ranged in size from a few millimetres to a few centimetres in body length and had segmented abdomens (opisthosoma), with the dorsal exoskeleton (tergites) across the backs of the animals' abdomens, which were characteristically divided into three or five separate plates. [1] Probably living as predators on other arthropods, some later trigonotarbid species were quite heavily armoured and protected themselves with spines and tubercles. [4] About seventy species are currently known, with most fossils originating from the Carboniferous coal measures.

Contents

Historical background

Fossils of Eophrynus prestvicii Eophrynus prestvicii BU669.jpg
Fossils of Eophrynus prestvicii

The first trigonotarbid was described in 1837 from the coal measures of Coalbrookdale in England by the famous English geologist Dean William Buckland. [5] He believed it to be a fossil beetle and named it Curculoides prestvicii. A much better preserved example was later discovered from Coseley near Dudley; also in the English West Midlands conurbation. Described in 1871 by Henry Woodward, [6] he correctly identified it as an arachnid and renamed it Eophrynus prestvicii —whereby the genus name comes from ἠώς (eos, meaning 'dawn'), and Phrynus , a genus of living whip spider (Amblypygi). Woodward subsequently described another trigonotarbid, Brachypyge carbonis, from the coal measures of Mons in Belgium; [7] although this fossil is known only from its abdomen and was initially mistaken for those of a crab.

A new arachnid order

Reconstruction of Trigonotarbus johnsoni, the eponymous species of Trigonotarbida. 20201202 Trigonotarbus johnsoni.png
Reconstruction of Trigonotarbus johnsoni, the eponymous species of Trigonotarbida.

In 1882, the German zoologist Ferdinand Karsch described a number of fossil arachnids from the coal measures of Neurode in Silesia (now Poland), including one he named Anthracomartus voelkelianus in honour of Herr Völkel, the foreman of the mine where it was discovered. [9] This species was raised to a new, extinct, arachnid order which Karsch called Anthracomarti. The name is derived from ἄνθραξ (anthrax), the Greek word for coal. A number of other fossils which would eventually be placed in Trigonotarbida were discovered around this time. Hanns Bruno Geinitz described Kreischeria wiedei from the coal measures of Zwickau in Germany, [10] although he interpreted it as a fossil pseudoscorpion. Johann Kušta described Anthracomartus krejcii [11] from Rakovník in the Czech Republic, and published further descriptions in a number of subsequent papers. [12] [13] [14] In 1884, Samuel Hubbard Scudder described Anthracomartus trilobitus from Fayetteville, Arkansas—the first trigonotarbid from North America. [15]

Relationships

Pantetrapulmonata

†Trigonotarbita

？

Ricinulei

Tetrapulmonata
Internal phylogeny of Pantetrapulmonata, showing position of Trigonotarbita and possible relationship with Ricinulei. [16] [17] Extinct taxa indicaded by '†'.

Early studies tended to confuse trigonotarbids with other living or extinct groups of arachnids; particularly harvestmen (Opiliones). Petrunkevitch's division of the trigonotarbids into two, unrelated, orders was noted above. In detail, he divided the arachnids into suborders based on the width of the division between the two parts of the body (the prosoma and opisthosoma). Anthracomartida and another extinct order, Haptopoda, were grouped into a subclass Stethostomata defined by a broad division of the body and downward-hanging mouthparts. Trigonotarbida was placed in its own subclass Soluta and defined as having a division of the body which was variable in width. Petrunkevitch's scheme was largely followed in subsequent studies of fossil arachnids.

Pantetrapulmonata

In the 1980s, Bill Shear and colleagues [18] carried out an important study on well preserved Mid Devonian trigonotarbids from Gilboa, New York. They questioned whether it was appropriate to define a group of animals on a variable character state and carried out the first cladistic analysis of fossil and living arachnids. They showed that trigonotarbids are closely related to a group of arachnids which have gone under various names (Caulogastra, Arachnidea, etc.), but for which the name Tetrapulmonata has become most widespread. [19] Members of the Tetrapulmonata include spiders (Araneae), whip spiders (Amblypygi), whip scorpions (Uropygi) and shorttailed whipscorpion (Schizomida) and, together with trigonotarbids, share characters like two pairs of book lungs and similar mouthparts with fangs operating rather like a pocket knife. [20] In a 2007 study of arachnid relationships, the Shear et al. hypothesis was largely supported and a group Pantetrapulmonata was proposed which comprises Trigonotarbida + Tetrapulmonata. [21] This has since been corroborated in more recent cladistic analyses. [22] [23] [24] [25]

Trigonotarbids and ricinuleids

20201205 Palaeocharinus rhyniensis.png
Reconstruction of Palaeocharinus , a genus known to have tiny pedipalpal claws.
Ricinulei from Fernandez & Giribet, nymph of Ricinoides atewa (2015) (cropped).jpg
The ricinuleid species Ricinoides atewa , showing divided tergites.

In 1892, Ferdinand Karsch suggested that the rare and rather bizarre-looking ricinuleids (Ricinulei) were the last living descendants of the trigonotarbids. [26] A similar hypothesis was reintroduced by Dunlop, [16] who pointed out distinct similarities and possible sister group relationship between these arachnid groups. Both have opisthosomal tergites divided into median and lateral plates and both have a complicated coupling mechanism between the prosoma and the opisthosoma which 'locks' the two halves of the body together. Although cladistic analysis has tended to recover ricinuleids in their traditional position closely related to mites and ticks, further discoveries have revealed that the tip of the pedipalp ends in a small claw in both trigonotarbids and ricinuleids. [17] [27] If the hypothesis is true, ricinuleids, despite the lack of tetrapulmonate key characters (e.g. book lungs), may represent part of the pantetrapulmonate clade alongside trigonotarbids as well. [16] [17] [20]

Internal relationships

The first cladistic analysis of the trigonotarbids was published in 2014. [8] This recovered the families Anthracomartidae, Anthracosironidae, and Eophrynidae as monophyletic. In contrast Trigonotarbidae, Aphantomartidae, Palaeocharinidae, and Kreischeriidae were not. Two clades were consistently recovered with strong support—( Palaeocharinus (Archaeomartidae + Anthracomartidae)), and Lissomartus as sister group the 'eophrynid assemblage' ( Aphantomartus ( Alkenia ( Pseudokreischeria ( Kreischeria ( Eophrynus  +  Pleophrynus ))))).

Description

Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) morphology of a trigonotarbid. 20201108 Trigonotarbida dorsal ventral morphology.png
Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) morphology of a trigonotarbid.
External morphology of a trigonotarbid in sagittal section. 20201109 Trigonotarbida sagittal external morphology.png
External morphology of a trigonotarbid in sagittal section.

Trigonotarbids superficially resemble spiders, but can be easily recognised by having tergites on the dorsal side of the opisthosoma divided into median and lateral plates. [28] This character is shared with ricinuleids (Ricinulei) (see also Ricinulei#Relationships). As in other arachnids, the body is divided into a prosoma (or cephalothorax) and opisthosoma (or abdomen). Body length ranges from a couple of millimetres up to about 5 cm (2.0 in). [29]

Prosoma

The prosoma is covered by the carapace and always bears a pair of median eyes. [1] In the probably basal families Palaeocharinidae, Anthracomartidae [30] —and perhaps also Anthracosironidae—there is an additional pair of lateral eye tubercles which, at least in palaeocharinids, [31] appear to have borne a series of individual lenses. In this sense palaeocharinids seem to be in the process of reducing a compound eye. [32] Anterior margin of the carapace protrude into a projection referred to as clypeus. [22]

The chelicerae are of the "pocket-knife" type consisting of a basal segment and a sharp, curving fang. [1] The chelicerae are described as paleognathic: the fangs are held parallel to one another, like those of mesothele and mygalomorph spiders, but the chelicerae hang downwards like those of araneomorph spiders. [33] There is no evidence in well-preserved fossils for the opening of a venom gland, thus trigonotarbids were probably not venomous. The chelicerae may have been slightly retractable into the prosoma. Well-preserved palaeocharinids show evidence for a small, slit-like mouth with an upper lip (a labrum or rostrum) and a lower lip (or labium). [34] Inside the mouth there is some sort of filtering system formed from hairs or platelets which strongly suggests that trigonotarbids (like spiders and many other arachnids) could eat only preorally digested, liquified prey. [34]

The pedipalps have the typical arachnid structure with a coxa, trochanter, femur, patella, tibia and tarsus. They are pediform, i.e. they look like small legs and were not highly modified. [35] There is no evidence for a special sperm transfer device as in the modified palpal organ of male spiders. In at least the palaeocharinids and anthracomartids the tip of the pedipalp is modified into a small chela (claw) formed from the tarsal claw (or apotele) and a projection from the tarsus. As mentioned above, a very similar arrangement is seen at the end of the pedipalp in Ricinulei. [17] [27]

The walking legs again follow the typical arachnid plan with a coxa, trochanter, femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus and tarsus. [1] The coxae surround a single sternum. In well preserved palaeocharinids there is a ring, or annulus, around the trochanter–femur joint which may be the remains of an earlier leg segment. [35] The legs are largely unmodified, although in Anthracosironidae the forelegs are quite large and spiny, [36] presumably to help catch prey. The legs end in three claws, two large ones and a smaller median claw. [35]

Opisthosoma

Fossil of Namurotarbus roessleri, showing divided tergites. Archaeomartus roessleri.jpg
Fossil of Namurotarbus roessleri, showing divided tergites.
Reconstruction of an anthracomartid trigonotarbid Maiocercus celticus, showing 5 rows of dorsal plates. 20201202 Maiocercus celticus.png
Reconstruction of an anthracomartid trigonotarbid Maiocercus celticus, showing 5 rows of dorsal plates.

The opisthosoma is largely suboval in outline with a flatten dorsal surface. [35] It compose of 12 segments, with some of them had undergone degrees of fusion or reduction, hence the previous misinterpretation of around 8 to 11 segments. [20] Tergite of the first segment partially covered by the posterior margin of preceding carapace, forming a complicated coupling mechanism known as 'locking ridge'. [1] [20] Tergites of segment 2 to 8 (segment 9 in some species) were all laterally divided into 3 (one median and two lateral) plates, with those of segment 2 and 3 fused to each other in most species. [20] However, the corresponding tergites of the family Anthracomartidae are further subdivided into 5 plates. [30] The last 3 segments are usually only visible from the ventral side, [1] with the 2 final segments constricted into a tiny ring-like section known as pygidium. [20]

Ventral side of opisthosomal segment 2 to 9 covered by series of lung-bearing opercula (2 and 3) and curved sternites (4 to 9). [1] [20] The first segment apparently lacking any ventral plates. Just like other lung-bearing arachnids (scorpion and tetrapulmonate), the book lungs of trigonotarbids formed by layers of trabecula-bearing lamellae, which is a feature adapted to a terrestrial, air-breathing lifestyle. [37] A pair of ventral sacs located between the posterior operculum and following sternite had been observed in some species. [38] [4] [20]

Paleobiology

In July 2014 scientists used computer-based techniques to re-create a possible walking gait for the animal. [39] [35] A subsequent review article suggested by comparison with mites, with presumably similar lifestyle and environment, a metachronal rather than alternating leg coordination was more likely. [40] Subsequent work by the researchers behind the initial publication [35] used simulation approaches to assess the efficiency of a range of gaits using an updated trigonotarbid model. [41]

Included taxa

As of 2020, 70 valid species had been included under Trigonotarbida as follows: [3]

plesion taxa
Palaeocharinidae Hirst, 1923
Archaeomartidae Haase, 1890
Anthracomartidae Haase, 1890
Anthracosironidae Pocock, 1903
Trigonotarbidae Petrunkevitch, 1949
Lissomartidae Dunlop, 1995
Aphantomartidae Petrunkevitch, 1945
Kreischeriidae Haase, 1890
Eophrynidae Karsch, 1882
Family uncertain
incertae sedis
nomina dubia

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ricinulei</span> Order of obscure arachnids

Ricinulei is a small order of arachnids. Like most arachnids, they are predatory, eating small arthropods. They occur today in west-central Africa (Ricinoides) and the Americas as far north as Texas. As of 2021, 91 extant species of ricinuleids have been described worldwide, all in the single family Ricinoididae. In older works they are sometimes referred to as Podogona. Due to their obscurity they do not have a proper common name, though in academic literature they are occasionally referred to as hooded tickspiders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mesothelae</span> Suborder of spiders

The Mesothelae are a suborder of spiders. As of April 2024, two extant families were accepted by the World Spider Catalog, Liphistiidae and Heptathelidae. Alternatively, the Heptathelidae can be treated as a subfamily of a more broadly circumscribed Liphistiidae. There are also a number of extinct families.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xiphosura</span> Order of marine chelicerates

Xiphosura is an order of arthropods related to arachnids. They are more commonly known as horseshoe crabs. They first appeared in the Hirnantian. Currently, there are only four living species. Xiphosura contains one suborder, Xiphosurida, and several stem-genera.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthrolycosidae</span> Extinct family of animals, possibly spiders

Arthrolycosidae is an extinct family of arachnids, possibly spiders. Fossils placed in the family were found in the Carboniferous to Permian. They were considered by Alexander Petrunkevitch to be "mesotheles", i.e. placed in the spider suborder Mesothelae. However, Paul A. Selden has stated they only have "the general appearance of spiders", with segmented abdomens (opisthosomae), but no definite spinnerets. At least some of the specimens placed in the family in the genus Arthrolycosa are considered to be spiders, whereas Eocteniza is "rather problematic as a spider".

The Arthromygalidae are an extinct family of arachnids, possibly spiders. Fossils placed in the family were all found in the Carboniferous, 359 to 299 million years ago. They were considered by Alexander Petrunkevitch to be "mesotheles", i.e. placed in the spider suborder Mesothelae. Petrunkevitch used the family for Carboniferous fossils he regarded as mesotheles but which lacked eyes. Paul A. Selden has shown the fossil specimens only have "the general appearance of spiders", with segmented abdomens (opisthosomae), but no definite spinnerets.

<i>Plesiosiro</i> Extinct genus of arachnids

Plesiosiro is an extinct arachnid genus known exclusively from nine specimens from the Upper Carboniferous of Coseley, Staffordshire, United Kingdom. The genus is monotypic, represented only by the species Plesiosiro madeleyi described by Reginald Innes Pocock in his important 1911 monograph on British Carboniferous arachnids. It is the only known member of the order Haptopoda.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phalangiotarbida</span> Extinct order of arachnids

Phalangiotarbida is an extinct arachnid order first recorded from the Early Devonian of Germany and most widespread in the Upper Carboniferous coal measures of Europe and North America. The last species are known from the early Permian Rotliegend of Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tetrapulmonata</span> Clade of arachnids

Tetrapulmonata is a non-ranked supra-ordinal clade of arachnids. It is composed of the extant orders Uropygi, Schizomida, Amblypygi and Araneae (spiders). It is the only supra-ordinal group of arachnids that is strongly supported in molecular phylogenetic studies. Two extinct orders are also placed in this clade, Haptopoda and Uraraneida. In 2016, a newly described fossil arachnid, Idmonarachne, was also included in the Tetrapulmonata; as of March 2016 it has not been assigned to an order.

<i>Palaeophonus</i> Extinct genus of scorpions

Palaeophonus is one of the oldest known genera of scorpions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution of spiders</span> Origin from a chelicerate ancestor and diversification of spiders through geologic time

The evolution of spiders has been ongoing for at least 380 million years. The group's origins lie within an arachnid sub-group defined by the presence of book lungs ; the arachnids as a whole evolved from aquatic chelicerate ancestors. More than 45,000 extant species have been described, organised taxonomically in 3,958 genera and 114 families. There may be more than 120,000 species. Fossil diversity rates make up a larger proportion than extant diversity would suggest with 1,593 arachnid species described out of 1,952 recognized chelicerates. Both extant and fossil species are described annually by researchers in the field. Major developments in spider evolution include the development of spinnerets and silk secretion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthracomartidae</span> Extinct family of spiders

Anthracomartidae, first described by Haase, 1890, is a family of the extinct arachnid order Trigonotarbida. It is likely to be most closely related to the Archaeomartidae, based on a 2014 cladistic analysis, within the clade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harvestman phylogeny</span> Order of arachnids

Harvestmen (Opiliones) are an order of arachnids often confused with spiders, though the two orders are not closely related. Research on harvestman phylogeny is in a state of flux. While some families are clearly monophyletic, that is share a common ancestor, others are not, and the relationships between families are often not well understood.

<i>Attercopus</i> Extinct genus of spider-like arachnids

Attercopus is an extinct genus of arachnids, containing one species Attercopus fimbriunguis, known from flattened cuticle fossils from the Panther Mountain Formation in Upstate New York. It is placed in the extinct order Uraraneida, spider-like animals able to produce silk, but which lacked true spinnerets and retained a segmented abdomen bearing a flagellum-like tail resembling that of a whip scorpion. They are thought to be close to the origins of spiders.

<i>Anthracomartus</i> Extinct genus of arachnid

Anthracomartus is an extinct genus of Carboniferous-aged trigonotarbid arachnids. A fossil of the species Anthracomartus hindi was found to be 23 millimetres (0.91 in) long and 14 millimetres (0.55 in) wide.

<i>Eophrynus prestvicii</i> Extinct species of arachnid

Eophrynus prestvicii is an extinct species of arachnid belonging to the order Trigonotarbida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eophrynidae</span> Extinct family of arachnids

Eophrynidae is a family of the extinct arachnid order Trigonotarbida. Eophrynids lived during the Carboniferous period in what is now modern Europe and North America. The family is probably found within the "eophrynid assemblage" clade:.

<i>Palaeocharinus</i> Extinct genus of spiders

Palaeocharinus is a genus of extinct trigonotarbid arachnids known from the Devonian of western Europe. The genus was first found and described in the Rhynie chert in the 1920s by Arthur Stanley Hirst and S. Maulik. The family to which the genus belongs may be paraphyletic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uraraneida</span> Order of arachnids

Uraraneida is an extinct order of Paleozoic arachnids related to modern spiders. Two genera of fossils have been definitively placed in this order: Attercopus from the Devonian of United States and Permarachne from the Permian of Russia. Like spiders, they are known to have produced silk, but lack the characteristic spinnerets of modern spiders, and retain elongate telsons.

<i>Maiocercus</i> Ancient genus of early Arachnids

Maiocercus celticus is a species of early trigonotarbid arachnid from the Upper Carboniferous of Westhoughton, Lancashire, UK. The species was first described in 1902, with a "new species" being described in 1911 which has been proven as being a junior synonym of M. celticus.

<i>Douglassarachne</i> Extinct species of arachnid

Douglassarachne is an extinct genus of arachnid from the Late Carboniferous (Moscovian), known from single species D. acanthopoda. It is known exclusively from one specimen recovered from the Mazon Creek Lagerstätte, Illinois, US.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A. (2010). "Fossils Explained: Trigonotarbids". Geology Today. 26 (1): 34–37. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2451.2010.00742.x. S2CID   247708509 . Retrieved June 12, 2015.
  2. ↑ Dunlop, J. A.; Rößler, R. (2013-08-01). "The youngest trigonotarbid Permotarbus schuberti n. gen., n. sp. from the Permian Petrified Forest of Chemnitz in Germany". Fossil Record. 16 (2): 229–243. Bibcode:2013FossR..16..229D. doi: 10.5194/fr-16-229-2013 . ISSN   2193-0074.
  3. 1 2 Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2020. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch , version 20.5
  4. 1 2 Dunlop, Jason; Garwood, Russell (2014). "Tomographic reconstruction of the exceptionally preserved trigonotarbid arachnid Eophrynus prestvicii". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. doi: 10.4202/app.2012.0032 .
  5. ↑ William Buckland (1837). Treatise IV. Geology and mineralogy with reference to natural theology. The Bridgewater treatises on the power, wisdom and goodness of God as manifested in the creation. (2nd ed.). London: William Pickering.
  6. ↑ H. Woodward (1871). "On the discovery of a new and very perfect Arachnide from the ironstone of the Dudley Coal-field". Geological Magazine . 8 (9): 1–4. Bibcode:1871GeoM....8..385W. doi:10.1017/s0016756800192817. S2CID   128850722.
  7. ↑ H. Woodward (1878). "Discovery of the remains of a fossil crab (Decapoda–Bracyura) in the Coal Measures of the Environs of Mons, Belgium". Geological Magazine . new series. 2 (5): 433–436. doi:10.1017/S0016756800152616. S2CID   129112886.
  8. 1 2 Jones, Fiona; Dunlop, Jason A.; Friedman, Matthew; Garwood, Russell J. (2014). "Trigonotarbus johnsoni Pocock, 1911, revealed by X-ray computed tomography, with a cladistic analysis of the extinct trigonotarbid arachnids". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 172 (1): 49–70. doi:10.1111/zoj.12167.
  9. ↑ F. Karsch (1882). "Ueber ein neues Spinnenthier aus der Schlesischen Steinkohle und die Arachnoiden überhaupt". Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft (in German). 34: 556–561.
  10. ↑ H. B. Geinitz (1882). "Kreischeria wiedei, ein Pseudoskorpion aus der Steinkohlenformation von Zwickau". Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft (in German). 34: 238–242.
  11. ↑ Johann Kušta (1883). "Anthracomartus krejcii, eine neue Arachnide aus dem Böhmischen Karbon". Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (in German). 1883: 7.
  12. ↑ Johann Kušta (1884). "Neue Arachniden aus der Steinkohlenformation von Rakonitz". Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (in German). 1884: 398–401.
  13. ↑ Johann Kušta (1885). "Neue fossile Arthropoden aus dem Noeggarathienschiefer von Rakonitz". Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (in German). 1885: 1–7.
  14. ↑ Johann Kušta (1888). "O nových arachnidech z karbonu Rakovnického. (Neue Arachniden aus der Steinkohlenformation bei Rakonitz)". Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (in Czech). 1888: 194–208.
  15. ↑ Samuel H. Scudder (1884). "A contribution to our knowledge of Paleozoic Arachnida". Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences . 20: 13–22. doi:10.2307/25138764. hdl: 2027/hvd.32044107176828 . JSTOR   25138764.
  16. 1 2 3 Jason A. Dunlop (1996). "Evidence for a sister group relationship between Ricinulei and Trigonotarbida" (PDF). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society . 10 (6): 193–204.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Jason A. Dunlop, Carsten Kamenz and Giovanni Talarico (2009). "A fossil trigonotarbid arachnid with a ricinuleid-like pedipalpal claw". Zoomorphology . 128 (4): 305–313. doi:10.1007/s00435-009-0090-z. S2CID   6769463.
  18. ↑ William A. Shear, Paul A. Selden, W. D. I. Rolfe, Patricia M. Bonamo & James D. Grierson (1987). "New terrestrial arachnids from the Devonian of Gilboa, New York". American Museum Novitates (2901): 1–74. hdl:2246/5166.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. ↑ Jeffrey W. Shultz (1990). "Evolutionary morphology and phylogeny of Arachnida". Cladistics . 6 (1): 1–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1990.tb00523.x . PMID   34933471. S2CID   85410687.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dunlop, Jason A.; Lamsdell, James C. (2017). "Segmentation and tagmosis in Chelicerata". Arthropod Structure & Development. 46 (3): 395–418. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2016.05.002. ISSN   1467-8039. PMID   27240897.
  21. ↑ Jeffrey W. Shultz (2007). "A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society . 150 (2): 221–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00284.x .
  22. 1 2 Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A. (2014). "Three-dimensional reconstruction and the phylogeny of extinct chelicerate orders". PeerJ. 2: e641. doi: 10.7717/peerj.641 . PMC   4232842 . PMID   25405073.
  23. ↑ Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A.; Selden, Paul A.; Spencer, Alan R. T.; Atwood, Robert C.; Vo, Nghia T.; Drakopoulos, Michael (2016). "Almost a spider: a 305-million-year-old fossil arachnid and spider origins". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283 (1827): 20160125. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0125 . ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   4822468 . PMID   27030415.
  24. ↑ Wang, Bo; Dunlop, Jason A.; Selden, Paul A.; Garwood, Russell J.; Shear, William A.; Müller, Patrick; Lei, Xiaojie (2018). "Cretaceous arachnid Chimerarachne yingi gen. et sp. nov. illuminates spider origins". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2 (4): 614–622. Bibcode:2018NatEE...2..614W. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0449-3. ISSN   2397-334X. PMID   29403075. S2CID   4239867.
  25. ↑ Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A.; Knecht, Brian J.; Hegna, Thomas A. (2017). "The phylogeny of fossil whip spiders". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 17 (1): 105. Bibcode:2017BMCEE..17..105G. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0931-1 . ISSN   1471-2148. PMC   5399839 . PMID   28431496.
  26. ↑ Ferdinand Karsch (1892). "Ueber Cryptostemma Guèr. als einziger recenter Ausläufer der fossilen Arachnoideen-Ordnung Meridogastra Thor". Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift (in German). 37 (1): 25–32. doi:10.1002/mmnd.18920370108.
  27. 1 2 Russell Garwood, Jason A. Dunlop & Mark D. Sutton (2009). "High-fidelity X-ray micro-tomography reconstruction of siderite-hosted Carboniferous arachnids". Biology Letters . 5 (6): 841–844. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0464. PMC   2828000 . PMID   19656861.
  28. ↑ Stephen R. Fayers, Jason A. Dunlop & Nigel H. Trewin (2005). "A new early Devonian trigonotarbid arachnid from the Windyfield chert, Rhynie, Scotland". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology . 2 (4): 269–284. Bibcode:2005JSPal...2..269F. doi:10.1017/S147720190400149X. S2CID   140706387.
  29. ↑ Ronny Rößler & Jason A. Dunlop (1997). "Redescription of the largest trigonotarbid arachnid – Kreischeria wiedei Geinitz 1882 from the Upper Carboniferous of Zwickau, Germany". Paläontologische Zeitschrift . 71 (3–4): 237–245. Bibcode:1997PalZ...71..237R. doi:10.1007/BF02988493. S2CID   129447249.
  30. 1 2 Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A. (2011). "Morphology and systematics of anthracomartidae (Arachnida: Trigonotarbida)". Palaeontology. 54 (1): 145–161. Bibcode:2011Palgy..54..145G. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.01000.x. ISSN   0031-0239. S2CID   83897592.
  31. ↑ Stanley Hirst & S. Maulik (1926). "On some arthropod remains from the Rhynie Chert (Old Red Sandstone)". Geological Magazine . 63 (2): 69–71. Bibcode:1926GeoM...63...69H. doi:10.1017/S0016756800083692. S2CID   129777833.
  32. ↑ Miether, Sebastian T.; Dunlop, Jason A. (2016). "Lateral eye evolution in the arachnids". Arachnology. 17 (2): 103–119. doi:10.13156/arac.2006.17.2.103. ISSN   2050-9928. S2CID   89428386.
  33. ↑ Dunlop, J.A. (1997). "Palaeozoic arachnids and their significance for arachnid phylogeny" (PDF). Proceedings of the 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology. Siedlce: Wydawnictwo Wyzszej Skoly Rolniczo-Pedagogicznej. pp. 65–82. Retrieved 2016-03-19.
  34. 1 2 Jason A. Dunlop (1994). "Comparative anatomy of filtration mechanisms in tetrapulmonate arachnids (Trigonotarbida, Araneae, Amblypygi, Uropygi and Schizomida)". Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society . 9: 267–273.
  35. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Garwood, Russell J.; Dunlop, Jason A. (July 2014). "The walking dead: Blender as a tool for paleontologists with a case study on extinct arachnids". Journal of Paleontology . 88 (4): 735–746. Bibcode:2014JPal...88..735G. doi:10.1666/13-088. ISSN   0022-3360. S2CID   131202472 . Retrieved July 21, 2015.
  36. ↑ R. I. Pocock (1903). "A new Carboniferous arachnid". Geological Magazine . Decade 4. 10 (6): 247–251. Bibcode:1903GeoM...10..247P. doi:10.1017/S001675680011252X. S2CID   128408478.
  37. ↑ Kamenz, Carsten; Dunlop, Jason A; Scholtz, Gerhard; Kerp, Hans; Hass, Hagen (2008-04-23). "Microanatomy of Early Devonian book lungs". Biology Letters. 4 (2): 212–215. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0597. ISSN   1744-9561. PMC   2429929 . PMID   18198139.
  38. ↑ Fayers, Stephen R.; Dunlop, Jason A.; Trewin, Nigel H. (2005). "A new early devonian trigonotarbid arachnid from the Windyfield Chert, Rhynie, Scotland" (PDF). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 2 (4): 269–284. Bibcode:2005JSPal...2..269F. doi:10.1017/S147720190400149X. ISSN   1477-2019. S2CID   140706387.
  39. ↑ Jonathan Amos (9 July 2014). "Ancient arachnid 'walks again'". BBC News. Retrieved 9 July 2014.
  40. ↑ Weihmann, Tom; Goetzke, Hanns Hagen; Günther, Michael (November 2015). "Requirements and limits of anatomy-based predictions of locomotion in terrestrial arthropods with emphasis on arachnids". Journal of Paleontology . 89 (6): 980–990. Bibcode:2015JPal...89..980W. doi:10.1017/jpa.2016.33. S2CID   86908527.
  41. ↑ MCLean, Callum. (2017). The Simulation of the Walking Gait of the Extinct Trigonotarbid Arachnid (MPhil). University of Manchester.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.