![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
217 of the 237 seats in the National Assembly 109 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Registered | 32,528,996 | ||||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 53.70% (![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
![]() Results by constituency | |||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
---|
![]() |
General elections were held in Pakistan on 25 February 1985 to elect members of the National Assembly. [1] The elections were held under the military government of Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq after the restoration of the 1973 constitution.
Around 1,300 candidates contested the elections, which were held on a nonpartisan basis. [2] Each candidate was required to have their nomination paper signed by 50 registered voters from the constituency they wished to stand in. [3] In an attempt to disqualify a large number of opposition candidates and secure a conservative leadership, Zia-ul-Haq introduced amendments to the Political Parties Act of 1962. As a result, the Movement for the Restoration of Democracy (MRD), which was calling for an end to the military regime, boycotted the elections. [4]
Voter turnout was 54%. Most of the elected MNAs were supporters of the Zia regime. A new government was formed under the leadership of Muhammad Khan Junejo, a lesser known figure in national politics. Prime Minister Junejo and his followers subsequently established the pro-Zia conservative Pakistan Muslim League.
![]() | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | % | Seats | |
Independents | 16,889,392 | 100.00 | 217 | |
Seats reserved for women | 20 | |||
Total | 16,889,392 | 100.00 | 237 | |
Valid votes | 16,889,392 | 96.69 | ||
Invalid/blank votes | 578,641 | 3.31 | ||
Total votes | 17,468,033 | 100.00 | ||
Registered voters/turnout | 32,528,996 | 53.70 | ||
Source: FAFEN |
Following the elections, Muhammad Khan Junejo was appointed prime minister and later formed a new party, the Pakistan Muslim League. The election boycott was viewed to have been a misstep for the MRD, which had assumed the public would support its stance. [4]