Ancient DNA

Last updated
Cross-linked DNA extracted from the 4,000-year-old liver of the ancient Egyptian priest Nekht-Ankh Ancient DNA.png
Cross-linked DNA extracted from the 4,000-year-old liver of the ancient Egyptian priest Nekht-Ankh

Ancient DNA (aDNA) is DNA isolated from ancient specimens. [1] [2] Due to degradation processes (including cross-linking, deamination and fragmentation) [3] ancient DNA is more degraded in comparison with contemporary genetic material. [4] Even under the best preservation conditions, there is an upper boundary of 0.4–1.5 million years for a sample to contain sufficient DNA for sequencing technologies. [5] The oldest sample ever sequenced is estimated to be 1.65 million years old. [6] Genetic material has been recovered from paleo/archaeological and historical skeletal material, mummified tissues, archival collections of non-frozen medical specimens, preserved plant remains, ice and from permafrost cores, marine and lake sediments and excavation dirt. In 2022, two-million year old genetic material was found in Greenland, and is currently considered the oldest DNA discovered so far. [7] [8]

Contents

History of ancient DNA studies

1980s

The first study of what would come to be called aDNA was conducted in 1984, when Russ Higuchi and colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley reported that traces of DNA from a museum specimen of the Quagga not only remained in the specimen over 150 years after the death of the individual, but could be extracted and sequenced. [9] Over the next two years, through investigations into natural and artificially mummified specimens, Svante Pääbo confirmed that this phenomenon was not limited to relatively recent museum specimens but could apparently be replicated in a range of mummified human samples that dated as far back as several thousand years. [10] [11] [12]

The laborious processes that were required at that time to sequence such DNA (through bacterial cloning) were an effective brake on the study of ancient DNA (aDNA) and the field of museomics. However, with the development of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in the late 1980s, the field began to progress rapidly. [13] [14] [15] Double primer PCR amplification of aDNA (jumping-PCR) can produce highly skewed and non-authentic sequence artifacts. Multiple primer, nested PCR strategy was used to overcome those shortcomings.

1990s

The post-PCR era heralded a wave of publications as numerous research groups claimed success in isolating aDNA. Soon a series of incredible findings had been published, claiming authentic DNA could be extracted from specimens that were millions of years old, into the realms of what Lindahl (1993b) has labelled Antediluvian DNA. [16] The majority of such claims were based on the retrieval of DNA from organisms preserved in amber. Insects such as stingless bees, [17] [18] termites, [19] and wood gnats, [20] as well as plant [21] and bacterial [22] sequences were said to have been extracted from Dominican amber dating to the Oligocene epoch. Still older sources of Lebanese amber-encased weevils, dating to within the Cretaceous epoch, reportedly also yielded authentic DNA. [23] Claims of DNA retrieval were not limited to amber.

Reports of several sediment-preserved plant remains dating to the Miocene were published. [24] [25] Then in 1994, Woodward et al. reported what at the time was called the most exciting results to date [26] — mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences that had apparently been extracted from dinosaur bones dating to more than 80 million years ago. When in 1995 two further studies reported dinosaur DNA sequences extracted from a Cretaceous egg, [27] [28] it seemed that the field would revolutionize knowledge of the Earth's evolutionary past. Even these extraordinary ages were topped by the claimed retrieval of 250-million-year-old halobacterial sequences from halite. [29] [30]

The development of a better understanding of the kinetics of DNA preservation, the risks of sample contamination and other complicating factors led the field to view these results more skeptically. Numerous careful attempts failed to replicate many of the findings, and all of the decade's claims of multi-million year old aDNA would come to be dismissed as inauthentic. [31]

2000s

Single primer extension amplification was introduced in 2007 to address postmortem DNA modification damage. [32] Since 2009 the field of aDNA studies has been revolutionized with the introduction of much cheaper research techniques. [33] The use of high-throughput Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques in the field of ancient DNA research has been essential for reconstructing the genomes of ancient or extinct organisms. A single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) library preparation method has sparked great interest among ancient DNA (aDNA) researchers. [34] [35]

In addition to these technical innovations, the start of the decade saw the field begin to develop better standards and criteria for evaluating DNA results, as well as a better understanding of the potential pitfalls. [31] [36]

On 7 December 2022, The New York Times reported that two-million year old genetic material was found in Greenland, and is currently considered the oldest DNA discovered so far. [7] [8]

Problems and errors

Degradation processes

Due to degradation processes (including cross-linking, deamination and fragmentation), [3] ancient DNA is of lower quality than modern genetic material. [4] The damage characteristics and ability of aDNA to survive through time restricts possible analyses and places an upper limit on the age of successful samples. [4] There is a theoretical correlation between time and DNA degradation, [37] although differences in environmental conditions complicate matters. Samples subjected to different conditions are unlikely to predictably align to a uniform age-degradation relationship. [38] The environmental effects may even matter after excavation, as DNA decay-rates may increase, [39] particularly under fluctuating storage conditions. [40] Even under the best preservation conditions, there is an upper boundary of 0.4 to 1.5 million years for a sample to contain sufficient DNA for contemporary sequencing technologies. [5]

Research into the decay of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA in moa bones has modelled mitochondrial DNA degradation to an average length of 1 base pair after 6,830,000 years at −5 °C. [4] The decay kinetics have been measured by accelerated aging experiments, further displaying the strong influence of storage temperature and humidity on DNA decay. [41] Nuclear DNA degrades at least twice as fast as mtDNA. Early studies that reported recovery of much older DNA, for example from Cretaceous dinosaur remains, may have stemmed from contamination of the sample.

Age limit

A critical review of ancient DNA literature through the development of the field highlights that few studies have succeeded in amplifying DNA from remains older than several hundred thousand years. [42] A greater appreciation for the risks of environmental contamination and studies on the chemical stability of DNA have raised concerns over previously reported results. The alleged dinosaur DNA was later revealed to be human Y-chromosome. [43] The DNA reported from encapsulated halobacteria has been criticized based on its similarity to modern bacteria, which hints at contamination, [36] or they may be the product of long-term, low-level metabolic activity. [44]

aDNA may contain a large number of postmortem mutations, increasing with time. Some regions of polynucleotide are more susceptible to this degradation, allowing erroneous sequence data to bypass statistical filters used to check the validity of data. [31] Due to sequencing errors, great caution should be applied to interpretation of population size. [45] Substitutions resulting from deamination of cytosine residues are vastly over-represented in the ancient DNA sequences. Miscoding of C to T and G to A accounts for the majority of errors. [46]

Contamination

Another problem with ancient DNA samples is contamination by modern human DNA and by microbial DNA (most of which is also ancient). [47] [48] New methods have emerged in recent years to prevent possible contamination of aDNA samples, including conducting extractions under extreme sterile conditions, using special adapters to identify endogenous molecules of the sample (distinguished from those introduced during analysis), and applying bioinformatics to resulting sequences based on known reads in order to approximate rates of contamination. [49] [50]

Authentication of aDNA

Development in the aDNA field in the 2000s increased the importance of authenticating recovered DNA to confirm that it is indeed ancient and not the result of recent contamination. As DNA degrades over time, the nucleotides that make up the DNA may change, especially at the ends of the DNA molecules. The deamination of cytosine to uracil at the ends of DNA molecules has become a way of authentication. During DNA sequencing, the DNA polymerases will incorporate an adenine (A) across from the uracil (U), leading to cytosine (C) to thymine (T) substitutions in the aDNA data. [51] These substitutions increase in frequency as the sample gets older. Frequency measurement of the C-T level, ancient DNA damage, can be made using various software such as mapDamage2.0 or PMDtools [52] [53] and interactively on metaDMG. [54] Due to hydrolytic depurination, DNA fragments into smaller pieces, leading to single-stranded breaks. Combined with the damage pattern, this short fragment length can also help differentiate between modern and ancient DNA. [55] [56]

Non-human aDNA

Despite the problems associated with 'antediluvian' DNA, a wide and ever-increasing range of aDNA sequences have now been published from a range of animal and plant taxa. Tissues examined include artificially or naturally mummified animal remains, [9] [57] bone, [58] [59] [60] [61] paleofaeces, [62] [63] alcohol preserved specimens, [64] rodent middens, [65] dried plant remains, [66] [67] and recently, extractions of animal and plant DNA directly from soil samples. [68]

In June 2013, a group of researchers including Eske Willerslev, Marcus Thomas Pius Gilbert and Orlando Ludovic of the Centre for Geogenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark at the University of Copenhagen, announced that they had sequenced the DNA of a 560–780 thousand year old horse, using material extracted from a leg bone found buried in permafrost in Canada's Yukon territory. [69] [70] [71] A German team also reported in 2013 the reconstructed mitochondrial genome of a bear, Ursus deningeri , more than 300,000 years old, proving that authentic ancient DNA can be preserved for hundreds of thousand years outside of permafrost. [72] The DNA sequence of even older nuclear DNA was reported in 2021 from the permafrost-preserved teeth of two Siberian mammoths, both over a million years old. [6] [73]

Researchers in 2016 measured chloroplast DNA in marine sediment cores, and found diatom DNA dating back to 1.4 million years. [74] This DNA had a half-life significantly longer than previous research, of up to 15,000 years. Kirkpatrick's team also found that DNA only decayed along a half-life rate until about 100 thousand years, at which point it followed a slower, power-law decay rate. [74]

Human aDNA

Map of human fossils with an age of at least ~40,000 years that yielded genome-wide data Map of human fossils with an age of at least ~40,000 years that yielded genome-wide data and location of the Zlaty kun fossil.webp
Map of human fossils with an age of at least ~40,000 years that yielded genome-wide data

Due to the considerable anthropological, archaeological, and public interest directed toward human remains, they have received considerable attention from the DNA community. There are also more profound contamination issues, since the specimens belong to the same species as the researchers collecting and evaluating the samples.

Sources

Due to the morphological preservation in mummies, many studies from the 1990s and 2000s used mummified tissue as a source of ancient human DNA. Examples include both naturally preserved specimens, such as the Ötzi the Iceman frozen in a glacier [76] and bodies preserved through rapid desiccation at high altitude in the Andes, [12] [77] as well as various chemically treated preserved tissue such as the mummies of ancient Egypt. [78] However, mummified remains are a limited resource. The majority of human aDNA studies have focused on extracting DNA from two sources much more common in the archaeological record: bones and teeth. The bone that is most often used for DNA extraction is the petrous ear bone, since its dense structure provides good conditions for DNA preservation. [79] Several other sources have also yielded DNA, including paleofaeces, [80] and hair. [81] [82] Contamination remains a major problem when working on ancient human material.

Ancient pathogen DNA has been successfully retrieved from samples dating to more than 5,000 years old in humans and as long as 17,000 years ago in other species. In addition to the usual sources of mummified tissue, bones and teeth, such studies have also examined a range of other tissue samples, including calcified pleura, [83] tissue embedded in paraffin, [84] [85] and formalin-fixed tissue. [86] Efficient computational tools have been developed for pathogen and microorganism aDNA analyses in a small (QIIME [87] ) and large scale (FALCON [88] ).

Results

Taking preventative measures in their procedure against such contamination though, a 2012 study analyzed bone samples of a Neanderthal group in the El Sidrón cave, finding new insights on potential kinship and genetic diversity from the aDNA. [89] In November 2015, scientists reported finding a 110,000-year-old tooth containing DNA from the Denisovan hominin, an extinct species of human in the genus Homo. [90] [91]

The research has added new complexity to the peopling of Eurasia. A study from 2018 [92] showed that a Bronze Age mass migration had greatly impacted the genetic makeup of the British Isles, bringing with it the Bell Beaker culture from mainland Europe.

It has also revealed new information about links between the ancestors of Central Asians and the indigenous peoples of the Americas. In Africa, older DNA degrades quickly due to the warmer tropical climate, although, in September 2017, ancient DNA samples, as old as 8,100 years old, have been reported. [93]

Moreover, ancient DNA has helped researchers to estimate modern human divergence. [94] By sequencing African genomes from three Stone Age hunter gatherers (2000 years old) and four Iron Age farmers (300 to 500 years old), Schlebusch and colleagues were able to push back the date of the earliest divergence between human populations to 350,000 to 260,000 years ago.

As of 2021, the oldest completely reconstructed human genomes are ~45,000 years old. [95] [75] Such genetic data provides insights into the migration and genetic history – e.g. of Europe – including about interbreeding between archaic and modern humans like a common admixture between initial European modern humans and Neanderthals. [96] [75] [97]

Researchers specializing in ancient DNA

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human genome</span> Complete set of nucleic acid sequences for humans

The human genome is a complete set of nucleic acid sequences for humans, encoded as DNA within the 23 chromosome pairs in cell nuclei and in a small DNA molecule found within individual mitochondria. These are usually treated separately as the nuclear genome and the mitochondrial genome. Human genomes include both protein-coding DNA sequences and various types of DNA that does not encode proteins. The latter is a diverse category that includes DNA coding for non-translated RNA, such as that for ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA, ribozymes, small nuclear RNAs, and several types of regulatory RNAs. It also includes promoters and their associated gene-regulatory elements, DNA playing structural and replicatory roles, such as scaffolding regions, telomeres, centromeres, and origins of replication, plus large numbers of transposable elements, inserted viral DNA, non-functional pseudogenes and simple, highly repetitive sequences. Introns make up a large percentage of non-coding DNA. Some of this non-coding DNA is non-functional junk DNA, such as pseudogenes, but there is no firm consensus on the total amount of junk DNA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genomics</span> Discipline in genetics

Genomics is an interdisciplinary field of molecular biology focusing on the structure, function, evolution, mapping, and editing of genomes. A genome is an organism's complete set of DNA, including all of its genes as well as its hierarchical, three-dimensional structural configuration. In contrast to genetics, which refers to the study of individual genes and their roles in inheritance, genomics aims at the collective characterization and quantification of all of an organism's genes, their interrelations and influence on the organism. Genes may direct the production of proteins with the assistance of enzymes and messenger molecules. In turn, proteins make up body structures such as organs and tissues as well as control chemical reactions and carry signals between cells. Genomics also involves the sequencing and analysis of genomes through uses of high throughput DNA sequencing and bioinformatics to assemble and analyze the function and structure of entire genomes. Advances in genomics have triggered a revolution in discovery-based research and systems biology to facilitate understanding of even the most complex biological systems such as the brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mitochondrial Eve</span> Matrilineal most recent common ancestor of all living humans

In human genetics, the Mitochondrial Eve is the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of all living humans. In other words, she is defined as the most recent woman from whom all living humans descend in an unbroken line purely through their mothers and through the mothers of those mothers, back until all lines converge on one woman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mitochondrial DNA</span> DNA located in mitochondria

Mitochondrial DNA is the DNA located in mitochondria, cellular organelles within eukaryotic cells that convert chemical energy from food into a form that cells can use, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Mitochondrial DNA is only a small portion of the DNA in a eukaryotic cell; most of the DNA can be found in the cell nucleus and, in plants and algae, also in plastids such as chloroplasts.

Archaeogenetics is the study of ancient DNA using various molecular genetic methods and DNA resources. This form of genetic analysis can be applied to human, animal, and plant specimens. Ancient DNA can be extracted from various fossilized specimens including bones, eggshells, and artificially preserved tissues in human and animal specimens. In plants, ancient DNA can be extracted from seeds and tissue. Archaeogenetics provides us with genetic evidence of ancient population group migrations, domestication events, and plant and animal evolution. The ancient DNA cross referenced with the DNA of relative modern genetic populations allows researchers to run comparison studies that provide a more complete analysis when ancient DNA is compromised.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paleogenetics</span>

Paleogenetics is the study of the past through the examination of preserved genetic material from the remains of ancient organisms. Emile Zuckerkandl and Linus Pauling introduced the term in 1963, long before the sequencing of DNA, in reference to the possible reconstruction of the corresponding polypeptide sequences of past organisms. The first sequence of ancient DNA, isolated from a museum specimen of the extinct quagga, was published in 1984 by a team led by Allan Wilson.

Molecular anthropology, also known as genetic anthropology, is the study of how molecular biology has contributed to the understanding of human evolution. This field of anthropology examines evolutionary links between ancient and modern human populations, as well as between contemporary species. Generally, comparisons are made between sequences, either DNA or protein sequences; however, early studies used comparative serology.

Haplogroup T is a human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroup. It is believed to have originated around 25,100 years ago in the Near East.

Haplogroup I is a human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroup. It is believed to have originated about 21,000 years ago, during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) period in West Asia. The haplogroup is unusual in that it is now widely distributed geographically, but is common in only a few small areas of East Africa, West Asia and Europe. It is especially common among the El Molo and Rendille peoples of Kenya, various regions of Iran, the Lemko people of Slovakia, Poland and Ukraine, the island of Krk in Croatia, the department of Finistère in France and some parts of Scotland and Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human genetic variation</span> Genetic diversity in human populations

Human genetic variation is the genetic differences in and among populations. There may be multiple variants of any given gene in the human population (alleles), a situation called polymorphism.

The Neanderthal genome project is an effort of a group of scientists to sequence the Neanderthal genome, founded in July 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genetic history of the Middle East</span>

The genetic history of the Middle East is the subject of research within the fields of human population genomics, archaeogenetics and Middle Eastern studies. Researchers use Y-DNA, mtDNA, and other autosomal DNAs to identify the genetic history of ancient and modern populations of Egypt, Persia, Mesopotamia, Anatolia, Arabia, the Levant, and other areas.

The human mitochondrial molecular clock is the rate at which mutations have been accumulating in the mitochondrial genome of hominids during the course of human evolution. The archeological record of human activity from early periods in human prehistory is relatively limited and its interpretation has been controversial. Because of the uncertainties from the archeological record, scientists have turned to molecular dating techniques in order to refine the timeline of human evolution. A major goal of scientists in the field is to develop an accurate hominid mitochondrial molecular clock which could then be used to confidently date events that occurred during the course of human evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denisovan</span> Asian archaic human

The Denisovans or Denisova hominins(di-NEE-sə-və) are an extinct species or subspecies of archaic human that ranged across Asia during the Lower and Middle Paleolithic, and lived, based on current evidence, from 285 to 25 thousand years ago. Denisovans are known from few physical remains; consequently, most of what is known about them comes from DNA evidence. No formal species name has been established pending more complete fossil material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denisova Cave</span> Cave and archaeological site in Russia

Denisova Cave is a cave in the Bashelaksky Range of the Altai mountains, Siberian Federal District, Russia. The cave has provided items of great paleoarchaeological and paleontological interest. Bone fragments of the Denisova hominin originate from the cave, including artifacts dated to around 40,000 BP. Remains of a 32,000-year-old prehistoric species of horse have also been found in the cave.

The genetic history of Egypt reflects its geographical location at the crossroads of several major biocultural areas: North Africa, the Sahara, the Middle East, the Mediterranean and sub-Saharan Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Molecular paleontology</span>

Molecular paleontology refers to the recovery and analysis of DNA, proteins, carbohydrates, or lipids, and their diagenetic products from ancient human, animal, and plant remains. The field of molecular paleontology has yielded important insights into evolutionary events, species' diasporas, the discovery and characterization of extinct species. loo In shallow time, advancements in the field of molecular paleontology have allowed scientists to pursue evolutionary questions on a genetic level rather than relying on phenotypic variation alone. By applying molecular analytical techniques to DNA in Recent animal remains, one can quantify the level of relatedness between any two organisms for which DNA has been recovered. Using various biotechnological techniques such as DNA isolation, amplification, and sequencing scientists have been able to gain expanded new insights into the divergence and evolutionary history of countless recently extinct organisms. In February 2021, scientists reported, for the first time, the sequencing of DNA from animal remains, a mammoth in this instance, over a million years old, the oldest DNA sequenced to date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johannes Krause</span> German biochemist, geneticist and paleontologist

Johannes Krause is a German biochemist with a research focus on historical infectious diseases and human evolution. Since 2010, he has been professor of archaeology and paleogenetics at the University of Tübingen. In 2014, Krause was named a founding co-director of the new Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena.

Genetic studies on Neanderthal ancient DNA became possible in the late 1990s. The Neanderthal genome project, established in 2006, presented the first fully sequenced Neanderthal genome in 2013.

References

  1. Pevsner J (2015). Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN   978-1118581780.
  2. Jones M (2016). Unlocking the Past: How Archaeologists Are Rewriting Human History with Ancient DNA. Arcade. ISBN   978-1628724479.
  3. 1 2 Anderson LA (May 2023). "A chemical framework for the preservation of fossil vertebrate cells and soft tissues". Earth-Science Reviews. 240: 104367. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104367 . S2CID   257326012.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Allentoft ME, Collins M, Harker D, Haile J, Oskam CL, Hale ML, et al. (December 2012). "The half-life of DNA in bone: measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 279 (1748): 4724–33. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1745. PMC   3497090 . PMID   23055061.
  5. 1 2 Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Rønn R, Brand TB, Barnes I, Wiuf C, et al. (January 2004). "Long-term persistence of bacterial DNA" (PDF). Current Biology. 14 (1): R9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.012 . PMID   14711425. S2CID   12227538.
  6. 1 2 van der Valk T, Pečnerová P, Díez-Del-Molino D, Bergström A, Oppenheimer J, Hartmann S, et al. (March 2021). "Million-year-old DNA sheds light on the genomic history of mammoths". Nature. 591 (7849): 265–269. Bibcode:2021Natur.591..265V. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03224-9. PMC   7116897 . PMID   33597750.
  7. 1 2 Zimmer, Carl (7 December 2022). "Oldest Known DNA Offers Glimpse of a Once-Lush Arctic - In Greenland's permafrost, scientists discovered two-million-year-old genetic material from scores of plant and animal species, including mastodons, geese, lemmings and ants". The New York Times . Retrieved 7 December 2022.
  8. 1 2 Kjær, Kurt H.; et al. (7 December 2022). "A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA". Nature . 612 (7939): 283–291. Bibcode:2022Natur.612..283K. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05453-y. PMC   9729109 . PMID   36477129.
  9. 1 2 Higuchi R, Bowman B, Freiberger M, Ryder OA, Wilson AC (1984). "DNA sequences from the quagga, an extinct member of the horse family". Nature. 312 (5991): 282–4. Bibcode:1984Natur.312..282H. doi:10.1038/312282a0. PMID   6504142. S2CID   4313241.
  10. Pääbo S (1985a). "Preservation of DNA in ancient Egyptian mummies". J. Archaeol. Sci. 12 (6): 411–17. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(85)90002-0.
  11. Pääbo S (1985b). "Molecular cloning of Ancient Egyptian mummy DNA". Nature. 314 (6012): 644–5. Bibcode:1985Natur.314..644P. doi:10.1038/314644a0. PMID   3990798. S2CID   1358295.
  12. 1 2 Pääbo S (1986). "Molecular genetic investigations of ancient human remains". Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 51 (Pt 1): 441–6. doi:10.1101/SQB.1986.051.01.053. PMID   3107879.
  13. Mullis KB, Faloona FA (1987). "Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction". Recombinant DNA Part F. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 155. pp. 335–50. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6. ISBN   978-0-12-182056-5. PMID   3431465.
  14. Raxworthy, Christopher J.; Smith, Brian Tilston (November 2021). "Mining museums for historical DNA: advances and challenges in museomics" (PDF). Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 36 (11): 1049–1060. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.009. PMID   34456066. S2CID   239687836 . Retrieved 27 June 2022.
  15. Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, et al. (January 1988). "Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase". Science. 239 (4839): 487–91. Bibcode:1988Sci...239..487S. doi:10.1126/science.239.4839.487. PMID   2448875.
  16. Lindahl T (October 1993). "Recovery of antediluvian DNA". Nature. 365 (6448): 700. Bibcode:1993Natur.365..700L. doi: 10.1038/365700a0 . PMID   8413647. S2CID   4365447.
  17. Cano RJ, Poinar H, Poinar Jr GO (1992a). "Isolation and partial characterisation of DNA from the bee Problebeia dominicana (Apidae:Hymenoptera) in 25–40 million year old amber". Med Sci Res. 20: 249–51.
  18. Cano RJ, Poinar HN, Roubik DW, Poinar Jr GO (1992b). "Enzymatic amplification and nucleotide sequencing of portions of the 18S rRNA gene of the bee Problebeia dominicana (Apidae:Hymenoptera) isolated from 25–40 million year old Dominican amber". Med Sci Res. 20: 619–22.
  19. Matson E, Ottesen E, Leadbetter J (2007). "Extracting DNA from the gut microbes of the termite (Zootermopsis nevadensis)". Journal of Visualized Experiments (4): 195. doi:10.3791/195. PMC   2556161 . PMID   18979000.
  20. DeSalle R, Grimaldi D (December 1994). "Very old DNA". Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 4 (6): 810–5. doi:10.1016/0959-437x(94)90064-7. PMID   7888749.
  21. Poinar H, Cano R, Poinar G (1993). "DNA from an extinct plant". Nature. 363 (6431): 677. Bibcode:1993Natur.363..677P. doi: 10.1038/363677a0 . S2CID   4330200.
  22. Cano RJ, Borucki MK, Higby-Schweitzer M, Poinar HN, Poinar GO, Pollard KJ (June 1994). "Bacillus DNA in fossil bees: an ancient symbiosis?". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 60 (6): 2164–2167. Bibcode:1994ApEnM..60.2164C. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.6.2164-2167.1994 . PMC   201618 . PMID   8031102.
  23. Cano RJ, Poinar HN, Pieniazek NJ, Acra A, Poinar GO (June 1993). "Amplification and sequencing of DNA from a 120-135-million-year-old weevil". Nature. 363 (6429): 536–538. Bibcode:1993Natur.363..536C. doi:10.1038/363536a0. PMID   8505978. S2CID   4243196.
  24. Golenberg EM (September 1991). "Amplification and analysis of Miocene plant fossil DNA". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 333 (1268): 419–26, discussion 426–7. doi:10.1098/rstb.1991.0092. PMID   1684052.
  25. Golenberg EM, Giannasi DE, Clegg MT, Smiley CJ, Durbin M, Henderson D, Zurawski G (April 1990). "Chloroplast DNA sequence from a miocene Magnolia species". Nature. 344 (6267): 656–8. Bibcode:1990Natur.344..656G. doi:10.1038/344656a0. PMID   2325772. S2CID   26577394.
  26. Woodward SR, Weyand NJ, Bunnell M (November 1994). "DNA sequence from Cretaceous period bone fragments". Science. 266 (5188): 1229–32. Bibcode:1994Sci...266.1229W. doi:10.1126/science.7973705. PMID   7973705.
  27. An CC, Li Y, Zhu YX (1995). "Molecular cloning and sequencing of the 18S rDNA from specialized dinosaur egg fossil found in Xixia Henan, China". Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekinensis. 31: 140–47.
  28. Li Y, An C-C, Zhu Y-X (1995). "DNA isolation and sequence analysis of dinosaur DNA from Cretaceous dinosaur egg in Xixia Henan, China". Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekinensis. 31: 148–52.
  29. Vreeland RH, Rosenzweig WD, Powers DW (October 2000). "Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a primary salt crystal". Nature. 407 (6806): 897–900. Bibcode:2000Natur.407..897V. doi:10.1038/35038060. PMID   11057666. S2CID   9879073.
  30. Fish SA, Shepherd TJ, McGenity TJ, Grant WD (May 2002). "Recovery of 16S ribosomal RNA gene fragments from ancient halite". Nature. 417 (6887): 432–6. Bibcode:2002Natur.417..432F. doi:10.1038/417432a. PMID   12024211. S2CID   4423309.
  31. 1 2 3 Pääbo S, Poinar H, Serre D, Jaenicke-Despres V, Hebler J, Rohland N, et al. (2004). "Genetic analyses from ancient DNA" (PDF). Annual Review of Genetics. 38 (1): 645–79. doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214. PMID   15568989. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 17, 2008.
  32. Brotherton P, Endicott P, Sanchez JJ, Beaumont M, Barnett R, Austin J, Cooper A (2007). "Novel high-resolution characterization of ancient DNA reveals C > U-type base modification events as the sole cause of post mortem miscoding lesions". Nucleic Acids Research. 35 (17): 5717–28. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm588. PMC   2034480 . PMID   17715147.
  33. Reich 2018.
  34. Wales N, Carøe C, Sandoval-Velasco M, Gamba C, Barnett R, Samaniego JA, et al. (December 2015). "New insights on single-stranded versus double-stranded DNA library preparation for ancient DNA". BioTechniques. 59 (6): 368–71. doi: 10.2144/000114364 . PMID   26651516.
  35. Bennett EA, Massilani D, Lizzo G, Daligault J, Geigl EM, Grange T (June 2014). "Library construction for ancient genomics: single strand or double strand?". BioTechniques. 56 (6): 289–90, 292–6, 298, passim. doi: 10.2144/000114176 . PMID   24924389.
  36. 1 2 Nicholls H (February 2005). "Ancient DNA comes of age". PLOS Biology. 3 (2): e56. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030056 . PMC   548952 . PMID   15719062.
  37. Hebsgaard MB, Phillips MJ, Willerslev E (May 2005). "Geologically ancient DNA: fact or artefact?". Trends in Microbiology. 13 (5): 212–20. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.03.010. PMID   15866038.
  38. Hansen AJ, Mitchell DL, Wiuf C, Paniker L, Brand TB, Binladen J, et al. (June 2006). "Crosslinks rather than strand breaks determine access to ancient DNA sequences from frozen sediments". Genetics. 173 (2): 1175–9. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.057349. PMC   1526502 . PMID   16582426.
  39. Pruvost M, Schwarz R, Correia VB, Champlot S, Braguier S, Morel N, et al. (January 2007). "Freshly excavated fossil bones are best for amplification of ancient DNA". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (3): 739–44. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104..739P. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610257104 . PMC   1783384 . PMID   17210911.
  40. Burger J, Hummel S, Hermann B, Henke W (June 1999). "DNA preservation: a microsatellite-DNA study on ancient skeletal remains". Electrophoresis. 20 (8): 1722–8. doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19990101)20:8<1722::aid-elps1722>3.0.co;2-4. PMID   10435438. S2CID   7325310.
  41. Grass RN, Heckel R, Puddu M, Paunescu D, Stark WJ (February 2015). "Robust chemical preservation of digital information on DNA in silica with error-correcting codes". Angewandte Chemie. 54 (8): 2552–5. doi:10.1002/anie.201411378. PMID   25650567.
  42. Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Binladen J, Brand TB, Gilbert MT, Shapiro B, et al. (May 2003). "Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments". Science. 300 (5620): 791–5. Bibcode:2003Sci...300..791W. doi: 10.1126/science.1084114 . PMID   12702808. S2CID   1222227.
  43. Zischler H, Höss M, Handt O, von Haeseler A, van der Kuyl AC, Goudsmit J (May 1995). "Detecting dinosaur DNA". Science. 268 (5214): 1192–3, author reply 1194. Bibcode:1995Sci...268.1191B. doi: 10.1126/science.7605504 . PMID   7605504.
  44. Johnson SS, Hebsgaard MB, Christensen TR, Mastepanov M, Nielsen R, Munch K, et al. (September 2007). "Ancient bacteria show evidence of DNA repair". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (36): 14401–5. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10414401J. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706787104 . PMC   1958816 . PMID   17728401.
  45. Johnson PL, Slatkin M (January 2008). "Accounting for bias from sequencing error in population genetic estimates" (Free full text). Molecular Biology and Evolution. 25 (1): 199–206. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm239 . PMID   17981928.
  46. Briggs AW, Stenzel U, Johnson PL, Green RE, Kelso J, Prüfer K, et al. (September 2007). "Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (37): 14616–21. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10414616B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 . PMC   1976210 . PMID   17715061.
  47. Gansauge MT, Meyer M (September 2014). "Selective enrichment of damaged DNA molecules for ancient genome sequencing". Genome Research. 24 (9): 1543–9. doi:10.1101/gr.174201.114. PMC   4158764 . PMID   25081630.
  48. Pratas D, Hosseini M, Grilo G, Pinho AJ, Silva RM, Caetano T, et al. (September 2018). "Metagenomic Composition Analysis of an Ancient Sequenced Polar Bear Jawbone from Svalbard". Genes. 9 (9): 445. doi: 10.3390/genes9090445 . PMC   6162538 . PMID   30200636.
  49. Slatkin M, Racimo F (June 2016). "Ancient DNA and human history". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 113 (23): 6380–7. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.6380S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524306113 . PMC   4988579 . PMID   27274045.
  50. Borry M, Hübner A, Rohrlach AB, Warinner C (2021-07-27). "PyDamage: automated ancient damage identification and estimation for contigs in ancient DNA de novo assembly". PeerJ. 9: e11845. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11845 . PMC   8323603 . PMID   34395085.
  51. Dabney, Jesse; Meyer, Matthias; Pääbo, Svante (1 July 2013). "Ancient DNA Damage". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 5 (7): a012567. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012567. PMC   3685887 . PMID   23729639.
  52. Jónsson, H; Ginolhac, A; Schubert, M; Johnson, PL; Orlando, L (1 July 2013). "mapDamage2.0: fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters". Bioinformatics. 29 (13): 1682–4. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt193. PMC   3694634 . PMID   23613487.
  53. Skoglund, P; Northoff, BH; Shunkov, MV; Derevianko, AP; Pääbo, S; Krause, J; Jakobsson, M (11 February 2014). "Separating endogenous ancient DNA from modern day contamination in a Siberian Neandertal". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (6): 2229–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318934111 . PMC   3926038 . PMID   24469802.
  54. Michelsen, Christian; Pedersen, Mikkel Winther; Fernandez-Guerra, Antonio; Zhao, Lei; Petersen, Troels C.; Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand (9 December 2022). "metaDMG – A Fast and Accurate Ancient DNA Damage Toolkit for Metagenomic Data": 2022.12.06.519264. doi:10.1101/2022.12.06.519264. S2CID   254536966.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  55. Krause, Johannes; Briggs, Adrian W.; Kircher, Martin; Maricic, Tomislav; Zwyns, Nicolas; Derevianko, Anatoli; Pääbo, Svante (9 February 2010). "A Complete mtDNA Genome of an Early Modern Human from Kostenki, Russia". Current Biology. 20 (3): 231–236. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.068 . PMID   20045327. S2CID   16440465.
  56. Pochon, Zoé; Bergfeldt, Nora; Kırdök, Emrah; Vicente, Mário; Naidoo, Thijessen; Valk, Tom van der; Altınışık, N. Ezgi; Krzewińska, Maja; Dalen, Love; Götherström, Anders; Mirabello, Claudio; Unneberg, Per; Oskolkov, Nikolay (5 October 2022). "aMeta: an accurate and memory-efficient ancient Metagenomic profiling workflow": 2022.10.03.510579. doi:10.1101/2022.10.03.510579. S2CID   252763827.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  57. Thomas RH, Schaffner W, Wilson AC, Pääbo S (August 1989). "DNA phylogeny of the extinct marsupial wolf". Nature. 340 (6233): 465–7. Bibcode:1989Natur.340..465T. doi:10.1038/340465a0. PMID   2755507. S2CID   4310500.
  58. Hagelberg E, Sykes B, Hedges R (November 1989). "Ancient bone DNA amplified". Nature. 342 (6249): 485. Bibcode:1989Natur.342..485H. doi: 10.1038/342485a0 . PMID   2586623. S2CID   13434992.
  59. Cooper A, Mourer-Chauviré C, Chambers GK, von Haeseler A, Wilson AC, Pääbo S (September 1992). "Independent origins of New Zealand moas and kiwis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 89 (18): 8741–4. Bibcode:1992PNAS...89.8741C. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8741 . PMC   49996 . PMID   1528888.
  60. Hagelberg E, Thomas MG, Cook CE, Sher AV, Baryshnikov GF, Lister AM (August 1994). "DNA from ancient mammoth bones". Nature. 370 (6488): 333–4. Bibcode:1994Natur.370R.333H. doi:10.1038/370333b0. PMID   8047136. S2CID   8694387.
  61. Hänni C, Laudet V, Stehelin D, Taberlet P (December 1994). "Tracking the origins of the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) by mitochondrial DNA sequencing". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 91 (25): 12336–40. Bibcode:1994PNAS...9112336H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12336 . PMC   45432 . PMID   7991628.
  62. Poinar HN, Hofreiter M, Spaulding WG, Martin PS, Stankiewicz BA, Bland H, et al. (July 1998). "Molecular coproscopy: dung and diet of the extinct ground sloth Nothrotheriops shastensis". Science. 281 (5375): 402–6. Bibcode:1998Sci...281..402P. doi:10.1126/science.281.5375.402. PMID   9665881.
  63. Hofreiter M, Poinar HN, Spaulding WG, Bauer K, Martin PS, Possnert G, Pääbo S (December 2000). "A molecular analysis of ground sloth diet through the last glaciation". Molecular Ecology. 9 (12): 1975–84. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2000.01106.x. PMID   11123610. S2CID   22685601.
  64. Junqueira AC, Lessinger AC, Azeredo-Espin AM (March 2002). "Methods for the recovery of mitochondrial DNA sequences from museum specimens of myiasis-causing flies". Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 16 (1): 39–45. doi: 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2002.00336.x . PMID   11963980.
  65. Kuch M, Rohland N, Betancourt JL, Latorre C, Steppan S, Poinar HN (May 2002). "Molecular analysis of an 11,700-year-old rodent midden from the Atacama Desert, Chile". Molecular Ecology. 11 (5): 913–24. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01492.x. PMID   11975707. S2CID   10538371.
  66. Goloubinoff P, Pääbo S, Wilson AC (March 1993). "Evolution of maize inferred from sequence diversity of an Adh2 gene segment from archaeological specimens". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 90 (5): 1997–2001. Bibcode:1993PNAS...90.1997G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1997 . PMC   46007 . PMID   8446621.
  67. Dumolin-Lapègue S, Pemonge MH, Gielly L, Taberlet P, Petit RJ (December 1999). "Amplification of oak DNA from ancient and modern wood". Molecular Ecology. 8 (12): 2137–40. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00788.x. PMID   10632865. S2CID   41967121.
  68. Willerslev E, Cooper A (January 2005). "Ancient DNA". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 272 (1558): 3–16. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2813. PMC   1634942 . PMID   15875564.
  69. Erika Check Hayden (26 June 2013). "First horses arose 4 million years ago". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13261.
  70. Lee JL (November 7, 2017). "World's Oldest Genome Sequenced From 700,000-Year-Old Horse DNA". National Geographic . Retrieved May 19, 2019.
  71. Orlando L, Ginolhac A, Zhang G, Froese D, Albrechtsen A, Stiller M, et al. (July 2013). "Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse". Nature. 499 (7456): 74–8. Bibcode:2013Natur.499...74O. doi:10.1038/nature12323. PMID   23803765. S2CID   4318227.
  72. Dabney J, Knapp M, Glocke I, Gansauge MT, Weihmann A, Nickel B, et al. (September 2013). "Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110 (39): 15758–63. Bibcode:2013PNAS..11015758D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314445110 . PMC   3785785 . PMID   24019490.
  73. Callaway E (February 2021). "Million-year-old mammoth genomes shatter record for oldest ancient DNA". Nature. 590 (7847): 537–538. Bibcode:2021Natur.590..537C. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00436-x . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   33597786.
  74. 1 2 Kirkpatrick JB, Walsh EA, D'Hondt S (2016-07-08). "Fossil DNA persistence and decay in marine sediment over hundred-thousand-year to million-year time scales". Geology. 44 (8): 615–18. Bibcode:2016Geo....44..615K. doi: 10.1130/g37933.1 . ISSN   0091-7613.
  75. 1 2 3 Prüfer K, Posth C, Yu H, Stoessel A, Spyrou MA, Deviese T, et al. (June 2021). "A genome sequence from a modern human skull over 45,000 years old from Zlatý kůň in Czechia". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5 (6): 820–825. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01443-x . PMC   8175239 . PMID   33828249. CC-BY icon.svg Available under CC BY 4.0.
  76. Handt O, Richards M, Trommsdorff M, Kilger C, Simanainen J, Georgiev O, et al. (June 1994). "Molecular genetic analyses of the Tyrolean Ice Man". Science. 264 (5166): 1775–8. Bibcode:1994Sci...264.1775H. doi:10.1126/science.8209259. PMID   8209259.
  77. Montiel R, Malgosa A, Francalacci P (October 2001). "Authenticating ancient human mitochondrial DNA". Human Biology. 73 (5): 689–713. doi:10.1353/hub.2001.0069. PMID   11758690. S2CID   39302526.
  78. Hänni C, Laudet V, Coll J, Stehelin D (July 1994). "An unusual mitochondrial DNA sequence variant from an Egyptian mummy". Genomics. 22 (2): 487–9. doi:10.1006/geno.1994.1417. PMID   7806242.
  79. Pinhasi R, Fernandes D, Sirak K, Novak M, Connell S, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, et al. (2015-06-18). "Optimal Ancient DNA Yields from the Inner Ear Part of the Human Petrous Bone". PLOS ONE. 10 (6): e0129102. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1029102P. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129102 . PMC   4472748 . PMID   26086078.
  80. Poinar HN, Kuch M, Sobolik KD, Barnes I, Stankiewicz AB, Kuder T, et al. (April 2001). "A molecular analysis of dietary diversity for three archaic Native Americans". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98 (8): 4317–22. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.4317P. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061014798 . PMC   31832 . PMID   11296282.
  81. Baker LE (2001). Mitochondrial DNA haplotype and sequence analysis of historic Choctaw and Menominee hair shaft samples (PhD thesis). University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
  82. Gilbert MT, Wilson AS, Bunce M, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E, Shapiro B, et al. (June 2004). "Ancient mitochondrial DNA from hair". Current Biology. 14 (12): R463-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.008 . PMID   15203015.
  83. Donoghue HD, Spigelman M, Zias J, Gernaey-Child AM, Minnikin DE (1998). "Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA in calcified pleura from remains 1400 years old". Lett Appl Microbiol. 27 (5): 265–69. doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.t01-8-00449.x. PMID   9830142.
  84. Jackson PJ, Hugh-Jones ME, Adair DM, Green G, Hill KK, Kuske CR, et al. (February 1998). "PCR analysis of tissue samples from the 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax victims: the presence of multiple Bacillus anthracis strains in different victims". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95 (3): 1224–9. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.1224J. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1224 . PMC   18726 . PMID   9448313.
  85. Basler CF, Reid AH, Dybing JK, Janczewski TA, Fanning TG, Zheng H, et al. (February 2001). "Sequence of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus nonstructural gene (NS) segment and characterization of recombinant viruses bearing the 1918 NS genes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98 (5): 2746–51. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.2746B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.031575198 . PMC   30210 . PMID   11226311.
  86. Taubenberger JK, Reid AH, Krafft AE, Bijwaard KE, Fanning TG (March 1997). "Initial genetic characterization of the 1918 "Spanish" influenza virus". Science. 275 (5307): 1793–6. doi:10.1126/science.275.5307.1793. PMID   9065404. S2CID   8976173.
  87. QIIME
  88. Pratas D, Pinho AJ, Silva RM, Rodrigues JM, Hosseini M, Caetano T, Ferreira PJ (February 2018). "FALCON: a method to infer metagenomic composition of ancient DNA". bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/267179 .
  89. Lalueza-Fox C, Rosas A, de la Rasilla M (January 2012). "Palaeogenetic research at the El Sidrón Neanderthal site". Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. Special Issue: Ancient DNA. 194 (1): 133–7. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2011.01.014. hdl:10261/79609. PMID   21482084.
  90. Zimmer C (16 November 2015). "In a Tooth, DNA From Some Very Old Cousins, the Denisovans". The New York Times . Retrieved 16 November 2015.
  91. Sawyer S, Renaud G, Viola B, Hublin JJ, Gansauge MT, Shunkov MV, et al. (December 2015). "Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences from two Denisovan individuals". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 112 (51): 15696–700. Bibcode:2015PNAS..11215696S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519905112 . PMC   4697428 . PMID   26630009.
  92. Olalde I, Brace S, Allentoft ME, Armit I, Kristiansen K, Booth T, et al. (March 2018). "The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe". Nature. 555 (7695): 190–196. Bibcode:2018Natur.555..190O. doi:10.1038/nature25738. PMC   5973796 . PMID   29466337.
  93. Zimmer C (21 September 2017). "Clues to Africa's Mysterious Past Found in Ancient Skeletons". The New York Times . Retrieved 21 September 2017.
  94. Schlebusch CM, Malmström H, Günther T, Sjödin P, Coutinho A, Edlund H, et al. (November 2017). "Southern African ancient genomes estimate modern human divergence to 350,000 to 260,000 years ago". Science. 358 (6363): 652–655. Bibcode:2017Sci...358..652S. doi: 10.1126/science.aao6266 . PMID   28971970.
  95. "Neanderthal ancestry identifies oldest modern human genome". phys.org. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  96. "Europe's oldest known humans mated with Neandertals surprisingly often". Science News. 7 April 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  97. Hajdinjak M, Mafessoni F, Skov L, Vernot B, Hübner A, Fu Q, et al. (April 2021). "Initial Upper Palaeolithic humans in Europe had recent Neanderthal ancestry". Nature. 592 (7853): 253–257. Bibcode:2021Natur.592..253H. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03335-3 . PMC   8026394 . PMID   33828320. CC-BY icon.svg Available under CC BY 4.0.

Further reading