| Battle of Preveza | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Third Ottoman–Venetian War | |||||||
| Battle of Preveza, Ohannes Umed Behzad | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
| Holy League | |||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
| Strength | |||||||
| 120–150 galleys, galliots and gustas 366 cannons 3,000 janissaries and 8,000 soldiers [1] [2] | 130–170 galleys 50–140 carracks and galleons Possibly 250–300 other ships 2,500–2,594 cannon 60,000 soldiers [1] 140 carracks and galleons [3] | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| Several ships damaged 400 killed 800 wounded [1] [4] | Two galleys and five carracks sunk or captured (Spanish and Italian sources) [5] [6] [1] 128 ships sunk or captured (Turkish sources) [7] 13 ships sunk and 36 captured (English sources) [4] 3,000 prisoners [4] (English sources) | ||||||
The Battle of Preveza (also known as Prevesa) was a naval engagement that occurred on 28 September 1538 near Preveza in the Ionian Sea in northwest Greece, in the same area as the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. [8] The battle was between an Ottoman fleet, led by Kapudan Pasha Hayreddin Barbarossa, and a Holy League of Venetian and Hispano-Imperial composition, led by Genoese admiral Andrea Doria. It was part of both the Ottoman–Habsburg wars and the Ottoman Venetian War of 1537-1547. It ended with the Holy League routed by the Ottomans despite its enormous advantage in numbers and tonnage.
The course of the battle is uncertain; according to historian Roger Merriman, "accounts of it are so contradictory that it is almost impossible to reach the truth". [9] Traditional historiography, aligned with Venetian sources, holds the Holy Fleet was undone by an inexplicable lack of initiative by Doria, who might have had secret incentives to throw the battle. The Genoese were long time rivals to the Venetians, while Barbarossa was in midst of negotiations with Doria for a possible change of sides. [10] Conversely, Imperial sources blame the defeat on the Venetians, who would have refused to follow Doria's orders in a decisive moment out of the same enmity. [11]
The battle was amongst the three largest in the Mediterranean in the sixteenth century, alongside the Battle of Djerba and the Battle of Lepanto. [12] [13] In contrast, it was relatively uneventful, although it still resulted in a rupture between the Christian navies. [10] This marked the beginning of the Ottoman Empire as the first naval power in the Mediterranean, which lasted thirty years until their loss in Lepanto in 1571. [14]
In 1537, commanding a large Ottoman fleet, Hayreddin Barbarossa captured several Aegean and Ionian islands belonging to the Republic of Venice, namely Syros, Aegina, Ios, Paros, Tinos, Karpathos, Kasos, and Naxos, thus annexing the Duchy of Naxos. He unsuccessfully besieged Corfu, which belonged to the Republic of Venice, and ravaged the Spanish-held Calabrian coast. [15]
In February 1538, Pope Paul III assembled a Holy League, comprising the Papal States, Habsburg Spain, the Republic of Genoa, the Republic of Venice, and the Knights of Malta, to confront Barbarossa's fleet. [16] Andrea Doria, the Genoese admiral in service to Emperor Charles V, was in command. The Papal fleet under Admiral Marco Grimani and the Venetian fleet under Vincenzo Cappello arrived first. Doria joined them with the Spanish-Genoese fleet on 22 September 1538.
Before Doria arrived, Grimani attempted to land troops near the Fortress of Preveza but suffered significant casualties in an encounter with Ottoman forces under Murat Reis, causing a retreat to Corfu, where the Holy League assembled its fleet. Barbarossa was at Kos in the Aegean Sea at that time, but soon arrived at Preveza with the rest of the Ottoman fleet after capturing Kefalonia. Sinan Reis, an Ottoman lieutenant, suggested landing troops at Actium on the Gulf of Arta, near Preveza. Barbarossa initially opposed this idea, though it later proved important in securing Ottoman victory.
According to Cesáreo Fernández Duro, the Christian fleet was composed of 133 galleys, 72 carracks and galleons, and 250 minor vessels, with 50,000 men on board, 16,000 of them being marine infantry. They carried 2,500 cannons. Within the fleet, Doria commanded 49 Spanish and Genoese galleys, Cappello commanded 55 and Grimani captained 27, the rest being undisclosed allied ships. [17] For his part, Damiani gives a total of 146 galleys, including 30 Spanish, 80 Venetians and 36 Papals, along with 50 galleons and 200 other warships, with 60,000 men. [1] Roger Crowley gives 139 galleys and 70 sailing ships. [18]
According to chronicler Martín García Cereceda, who participated in the battle, the fleet featured 141 galleys and 62 sailing ships, with Spanish and Genoese providing 51 galleys and 50 ships, the Venetians 60 galleys and 12 ships, and the Papals 30 galleys. [19] A Turkish source gives 168 galleys, counting on 52 Genoese galleys, 70 Venetian, 36 Papal and 10 from the Knights of Malta, along with 140 galleons and 300 carracks and troop carriers, with 60,000 men and over 2500 cannons. [3]
The Ottoman fleet is listed by Duro as featuring 85 galleys, 30 galiots, 25 fustas and an unknown number of brigantines, giving a total of 150 ships, also carrying Turkish troops. [20] Damiani gives 130 galleys and 80 minor ships. [1] Crowley gives 90 galleys and 50 galiots. [18] The Turkish sources gives 122 galleys and frigates, with 8.000 troopers on board, among them 3.000 Janissaries. [3]
Although the Christian fleet enjoyed a vast advantage in numbers and means, its inner factionalism would prove a comparable drawback, while in turn the Ottoman fleet featured an unified command. [20] Tension between the Christian commanders were high, as the Venetians maintained a long time rivalry the Genoese and Spanish, who were in command of the fleet. This hostility would turn out disastrous. [21]
The night of the September 20, Doria and Viceroy of Sicily Ferrante Gonzaga met with a Spanish emissary of Barbarossa in Parga. The Ottoman admiral had been in talks with Charles V for a possible entry to his service, and was now tempted again. However, the Imperial side refused his demands to be handed back lordship of Tunis, while conversely, Barbarossa refused to set fire to all the Ottoman ships he could not take with him as the emperor wished. [9] On September 23, after their fleet joined the Holy League in Corfu, talks were held again by agents sent to Barbarossa. [22]
On September 25, after having located Barbarossa, Doria stationed his armada in front of the mouth of the gulf, where the two fleets observed each other in a stalemate. [23] Barbarossa could not leave, as he would have been overwhelmed, and the surrounding land was under Ottoman control, so his armada could wait safely. Doria would have won in a direct battle, but he could not assault the gulf as its mouth acted as a bottleneck for his ships. Furthermore, he was unable to manoeuvre his sailing ships, whose artillery he relied on, as strong winds threatened to drive the ships onto the hostile coast if they approached further. [23]
The Holy League were forced to disembark their landing forces and eliminate the Ottoman artillery before installing their own and turning the gulf against the Ottomans. A plan involving the Spanish Marine Infantry was considered and rejected due to Grimani's previous failure and because explorers could not find anywhere to safely disembark. [24] The Ottomans attempted to build additional fortifications but were prevented by the artillery fire from the coast. This was the only exchange that day as both sides did not want to risk making a mistake. [23]
During the night of September 27, Doria ordered his fleet to sail 30 miles south towards Sessola, near Leucade, and raid Lepanto and nearby Turkish positions to force Barbarossa to come out. [25] Barbarossa quickly ordered his fleet into a Y-shaped formation, with himself in the center, alongside Sinan Reis, Cafer Reis, Şaban Reis and his son Hasan Reis. Seydi Ali Reis commanded the left wing and Salih Reis commanded the right wing. Turgut Reis, accompanied by Murat Reis, Güzelce Mehmet Reis and Sadık Reis, commanded the rear wing with six large galliots.
Accounts of the battle are highly divergent. [9] Christian sources provide mutually incompatible accounts on the movements and intentions of Doria, Grimani and Cappello during the battle. Papal and Venetian sources, which became the mainstream version by their primacy and vigor, portray Doria as causing defeat through inaction, either deliberately or by incompetence, while Hispano-Imperial accounts blame Grimani and Cappello for refusing to follow Doria's battle plan in midst of the battle. [24] Paolo Giovio and Paolo Paruta were amongst the Papal and Venetian sources hostile to Doria, [26] while García Cereceda and imperial chronicler Jean de Vandenesse presented the version favorable to him. [24]
Venetian accounts state that Doria believed Barbarossa was too close to the Ottoman-controlled shore, so he did not order an attack. Cappello and Grimani disagreed with Doria and pushed for an attack. After three hours of discussion, Doria relented, ordering the galleys to turn north, where they would reunite with sailing ships. Weather disrupted his strategy, as a lack of wind caused the sailing ships to lag behind, giving Barbarossa an opportunity to attack them without leaving the Ottoman shore. The captains called for immediate help to ships, which were being attacked by the more mobile Ottoman galleys. [27]
Doria headed with the Christian galleys towards Barbarossa, trying to trap the Ottomans between them and the sailing ships. However, upon reaching the battle, he turned away, believing Barbarossa was still too close to the coast, and hoping to act as bait for Barbarossa to turn towards. Cappello, having recognised this, did not push Barbarossa further. [28] Cappello and Grimani grew weary from tactical manoeuvring, so they pushed for Doria to fight, even boarding his flagship. [29] [25] Doria refused, unsuccessfully faking an attack twice before the night fell. He ordered all Christian vessels to escape the next morning. [29]
Imperial sources state that Doria ordered the fleet to be ready after seeing Barbarossa leaving Arta. He ordered to turn around the fleet, which had the Venetian and Papal galleys at the forefront, the sailing ships in the center, and the Spanish and Genoese galleys in the rear guard. Wind favoured the sailing ships, commanded by Franco Doria, which left the fleet behind and advanced en masse while firing their artillery, inflicting damage on the Ottoman galleys. [30] However, wind stopped and rendered the sailing ships immobile. [31] [30]
Doria had believed the ships would be enough to defeat the Ottoman fleet, so he changed his gameplan. [32] He sent a messenger on a brigantine to call Grimani and Cappello, communicating his intent to attack with the galleys and asking if they complied, which they both confirmed. [33] Grimani thought it was risky to frontally engage Barbarossa, but was willing to do so. [31] Capello came to the extent of offering his son as a hostage to demonstrate his compliance. [34] Doria then signaled for the sailing ships to try to get between the Ottoman fleet and the coast, intending to cut them from their allied land, and eventually use the Christian galleys to envelop any Ottoman who attempted to do the same to the sailing ships. [31]
He ordered the Christian galleys to form, with the Spanish and Genoese galleys at the forefront, the Venetians in the center, and the Papal galleys in the rear guard. He also had some of his galleys form between the Venetian vessels, as he had previously deemed the latter unsuitable for battle, and had unsuccessfully tried to convince the Venetians to embark Spanish soldiers in their galleys. [33] However, despite Doria ordering to attack thrice, they Venetian and Papal galleys did not move. [33] [31] In turn, the Venetian galleys started moving away from the battle. [35]
As the Ottoman galleys had surrounded the sailing ships, the Doria dispatched Ferrante Gonzaga in another brigantine to urge Cappello and Grimani to follow his strategy. The allied captains replied evasively, with Grimani claiming he lacked superior orders from the Republic of Venice to engage in direct combat. [36] Doria was only followed by nine allied galleys. He sailed around the formation, calling the rest to regroup, but many became entangled in the attempt, which would have made them easy prey had the sailing ships not been between them and Barbarossa. [37]
Meanwhile, Barbarossa had started attacking the sailing ships. Doria had given up the battle, but he tried to make Barbarossa pursue him in order to get him away from the ships, advancing against him with his galleys before feinting and turning to open sea. However, Barbarossa did not take the bait and returned to attack the ships. The Genoese had ended up close to the Papal galleys, so he ordered two of them to go tow one of the immobile galleons to help it better use its artillery. They complied, but were captured by the Ottoman galleys in the attempt. [38]
Regardless of the cause, the sailing ships were under attack. The huge Venetian flagship Candia or Galeone di Venezia, captained by Alessandro Condalmiero, was left stranded 4 miles off the coast and 10 miles off Sessola. Condalmiero was surrounded by dozens of Ottoman galleys; he initially fended them off with heavy artillery, but Barbarossa's ships managed to position themselves on the ship's blind spots and attack. Condalmiero attempted to turn around to prevent this. The ship fought fiercely, waiting for galleys that did not arrive, ending up damaged, but not captured, even after Barbarossa's flagship joined the fray. [27]
The Spanish and Genoese sailing ships fought back through sheer firepower. The two main flagships, captained by Francisco Sarmiento and Juan Villegas de Figueroa, defended against multiple Ottoman attacks. Figueroa's ship was eventually overwhelmed, forcing his marine infantry to fight in a last stand until the vessel sank. Another ship, captained by Machín de Munguía with marine company, faced dozens of Turkish galleys, becoming dismasted and severely damaged, although ultimately escaping unboarded. [39] Several ships fired towards the attackers, while others lost hope of aid and abandoned the ships. [27]
Christian sources state that the Christians had lost two galleys and five ships by the end of the day, [5] [1] while Turkish sources state that the Ottomans had sunk, destroyed or captured 128 ships, taking approximately 3,000 prisoners. [7] Others sources state that there were 13 destroyed ships, 36 captured and 3,000 prisoners. [4] The Ottomans kept all of their ships, but 400 died and 800 were wounded.
Paul III met the news of the defeat with sorrow, and even considered to joining personally the fleet along with reinforcements. Charles V expressed similar intentions. [26] Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent celebrated highly the battle, ordering Barbarossa to pay 100.000 pieces of gold to his officers. [40]
Although their large fleet had come out mostly unscathed, there was large dissent within the Holy League due to their actions in battle. Due to prior hostility between Venice and Genoa, Cappello accused Doria of sabotaging the battle to not risk Hispano-Genoese ships, saving them for future operations outside the League, while leaving the ships of Venice to be destroyed. [40] Chroniclers focused on Doria's inexplicable decision to not attack despite his superior fleet. [41] Sephardic scholar Joseph ha-Kohen proposed that God confounded Doria's mind to punish him for mistreating Jewish prisoners in his campaigns. [42]
These considerations were amped by a lack of Imperial response. While carrying himself the version favorable to Doria, emissary Hernando Girón urged Imperial and Genoese representatives not to criticize the Venetians' actions during the battle, hoping not to worsen the morale of the Holy League. Similarly declining to present charges against Venice, Doria insisted for the League to continue the campaign. [43] The Venetian senate also abstained from directly accusing Doria, blaming the weather instead, although they ordered their ambassador in the Imperial court to prepare for possible accusations against the republic. [26]
The League next captured the fortress of Castelnuovo, present day Herceg Novi, Montenegro, to form a beachhead for an invasion of the Ottoman Balkans. Spaniards and Venetians fought over who would garrison Castelnuovo. To ease tensions, Charles V offered Venice permanent control over the fortress, but was rejected, as the Venetians claimed to lack the means to defend it. Venice had already started negotiations with the Ottomans. [44] Barbarossa launched an expedition to recover the fortress the following year, leading to the famed Siege of Castelnuovo. He captured almost all of the remaining Christian outposts in the Ionian and Aegean Seas.
In October 1540, negotiations between Charles V and Barbarossa still lasted, although Imperial liaison Francisco Duarte believed them to be increasingly unlikely. [22] The same month, a peace treaty was signed between Venice and the Ottoman Empire with the help of Franco-Ottoman diplomacy. The treaty had a heavy cost on the Venetians, as the the Ottomans gained control of the Venetian possessions in the Peloponnese and Dalmatia and the former Venetian islands in the Aegean, Ionian and Eastern Mediterranean sea. Venice also paid a war compensation of 300,000 ducats in gold to the Ottoman Empire. [14]
With the victory at Preveza and the subsequent victory at the Battle of Djerba in 1560, the Ottomans became the dominant naval power in the Mediterranean for thirty years. With Venice electing to sue for peace, the western alliances could not match the Ottoman navy. Ottoman superiority in similar battles remained unchallenged until the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. [14] [45] [10] The experience of the galleons during the battle, where they managed to repel large numbers of enemy galleys by superior firewpower, influenced western shipbuilding, leading to the development of galleasses, which would prove their value in lepanto. [46]