Cistercian numerals

Last updated

Numbers written with Cistercian numerals. From left to right: 1 in units place, 2 in tens place (20), 3 in hundreds place (300), 4 in thousands place (4,000), then compound numbers 5,555, 6,789, 9,394. Cistercian numerals.svg
Numbers written with Cistercian numerals. From left to right: 1 in units place, 2 in tens place (20), 3 in hundreds place (300), 4 in thousands place (4,000), then compound numbers 5,555, 6,789, 9,394.
The entry for the word 'aqua' in an early-thirteenth-century concordance from Brussels. Each character is a page/column number. These early Cistercian forms, with 3 and 4 swapped for 7 and 8, plus single and double dots for 5 and 6 and a triangular 9, are found in only one other surviving manuscript. The numbers are, 21, 41, 81, 85, 106, 115, 146, 148, 150, 169, 194, 198, 267, 268, 272, 281, 284, 295, 296, 317, 343, 368, 378, 387, 403, 404, 405, 420, 434, 435, 436, 446, 476, 506, 508, 552, 566, 591, 601, 604, 628, 635, 659, 678, 686, 697, 724, 759, 779, 783, 803, 818, 834, 858. Cistercian numeral concordance.png
The entry for the word 'aqua' in an early-thirteenth-century concordance from Brussels. Each character is a page/column number. These early Cistercian forms, with 3 and 4 swapped for 7 and 8, plus single and double dots for 5 and 6 and a triangular 9, are found in only one other surviving manuscript. The numbers are,
21, 41, 81, 85, 106, 115,
146, 148, 150, 169, 194, 198,
267, 268, 272, 281, 284, 295,
296, 317, 343, 368, 378, 387,
403, 404, 405, 420, 434, 435,
436, 446, 476, 506, 508, 552,
566, 591, 601, 604, 628, 635,
659, 678, 686, 697, 724, 759,
779, 783, 803, 818, 834, 858.

The medieval Cistercian numerals, or "ciphers" in nineteenth-century parlance, were developed by the Cistercian monastic order in the early thirteenth century at about the time that Arabic numerals were introduced to northwestern Europe. They are more compact than Arabic or Roman numerals, with a single glyph able to indicate any integer from 1 to 9,999.

Contents

Digits are based on a horizontal or vertical stave, with the position of the digit on the stave indicating its place value (units, tens, hundreds or thousands). These digits are compounded on a single stave to indicate more complex numbers. The Cistercians eventually abandoned the system in favor of the Arabic numerals, but marginal use outside the order continued until the early twentieth century.

History

The digits and idea of forming them into ligatures were apparently based on a two-place (1–99) numeral system introduced into the Cistercian Order by John of Basingstoke, archdeacon of Leicester, who it seems based them on a twelfth-century English shorthand ( ars notaria ). [nb 1] In its earliest attestations, in the monasteries of the County of Hainaut, the Cistercian system was not used for numbers greater than 99, but it was soon expanded to four places, enabling numbers up to 9,999. [2]

The two dozen or so surviving Cistercian manuscripts that use the system date from the thirteenth to the fifteenth century, and cover an area from England to Italy, Normandy to Sweden. The numbers were not used for arithmetic, fractions or accounting, but indicated years, foliation (numbering pages), divisions of texts, the numbering of notes and other lists, indexes and concordances, arguments in Easter tables, and the lines of a staff in musical notation. [3]

Samples of mixed alphabetic-Cistercian notation used for foliation in a late thirteenth-century manuscript. Shown are a1 to a6 and g1 to g7. Cistercian-alphabetic notation.png
Samples of mixed alphabetic-Cistercian notation used for foliation in a late thirteenth-century manuscript. Shown are a1 to a6 and g1 to g7.

Although mostly confined to the Cistercian order, there was some usage outside it. A late-fifteenth-century Norman treatise on arithmetic used both Cistercian and Indo-Arabic numerals. In one known case, Cistercian numerals were inscribed on a physical object, indicating the calendrical, angular and other numbers on the fourteenth-century astrolabe of Berselius, which was made in French Picardy. [4] After the Cistercians had abandoned the system, marginal use continued outside the order. In 1533, Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim included a description of these ciphers in his Three Books of Occult Philosophy. [5] The numerals were used by wine-gaugers in the Bruges area at least until the early eighteenth century. [6] [7] [8] In the late eighteenth century, Chevaliers de la Rose-Croix of Paris briefly adopted the numerals for mystical use, and in the early twentieth century Nazis considered using the numerals as Aryan symbolism. [3] [9] [10] [11]

The modern definitive expert on Cistercian numerals is the mathematician and historian of astronomy, David A. King. [12] [1]

Form

A horizontal stave was most common while the numerals were in use among the Cistercians. A vertical stave was attested only in Northern France in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. However, eighteenth- and twentieth-century revivals of the system in France and Germany used a vertical stave. There is also some historical variation as to which corner of the number represented which place value. The place-values shown here were the most common among the Cistercians and the only ones used later. [3] [13]

Using graphic substitutes with a vertical stave, [nb 2] the first five digits are ꜒ 1, ꜓ 2, ꜒꜓ 3, ꜓꜒ 4, ꜍ 5. Reversing them forms the tens, ˥ 10, ˦ 20, ˦˥ 30, ˥˦ 40, ꜈ 50. Inverting them forms the hundreds, ꜖ 100, ꜕ 200, ꜖꜕ 300, ꜕꜖ 400, ꜑ 500, and doing both forms the thousands, ˩ 1,000, ˨ 2,000, ˨˩ 3,000, ˩˨ 4,000, ꜌ 5,000. Thus ⌶ (a digit 1 at each corner) is the number 1,111. (The exact forms varied by date and by monastery. For example, the digits shown here for 3 and 4 were in some manuscripts swapped with those for 7 and 8, and the 5's may be written with a lower dot (꜎ etc.), with a short vertical stroke in place of the dot, or even with a triangle joining to the stave, which in other manuscripts indicated a 9.) [13] [1]

A 19th-century gravestone in Llanfyllin, Wales, inscribed in the Theban script and an adaptation of Cistercian numerals; the year 1834 at bottom left is written with the four characters for 1000, 800, 30, and 4, rather than the single character for 1834. Eglwys Sant Myllin Llanfyllin Powys North Wales 58.JPG
A 19th-century gravestone in Llanfyllin, Wales, inscribed in the Theban script and an adaptation of Cistercian numerals; the year 1834 at bottom left is written with the four characters for 1000, 800, 30, and 4, rather than the single character for 1834.

Horizontal numbers were the same, but rotated 90 degrees counter-clockwise. (That is, ⌙ for 1, ⌐ for 10, ⏗ for 100—thus ⏘ for 101—and ¬ for 1,000, as seen above.) [2] [1]

Omitting a digit from a corner meant a value of zero for that power of ten, but there was no digit zero. (That is, an empty stave was not defined.) [16]

Higher numbers

When the system spread outside the order in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, numbers into the millions were enabled by compounding with the digit for "thousand". For example, a late-fifteenth century Norman treatise on arithmetic indicated 10,000 as a ligature of ⌋ "1,000" wrapped under and around ⌉ "10" (and similarly for higher numbers), and Noviomagus in 1539 wrote "million" by subscripting ¬ "1,000" under another ¬ "1,000". [17] A late-thirteenth-century Cistercian doodle had differentiated horizontal digits for lower powers of ten from vertical digits for higher powers of ten, but that potentially productive convention is not known to have been exploited at the time; it could have covered numbers into the tens of millions (horizontal 100 to 103, vertical 104 to 107). [18] A sixteenth-century mathematician used vertical digits for the traditional values, horizontal digits for millions, and rotated them a further 45° counter-clockwise for billions and another 90° for trillions, but it is not clear how the intermediate powers of ten were to be indicated and this convention was not adopted by others. [19]

The Ciphers of the Monks

The Ciphers of the Monks: A Forgotten Number-notation of the Middle Ages, by David A. King and published in 2001, describes the Cistercian numeral system. [20]

The book [21] received mixed reviews. Historian Ann Moyer lauded King for re-introducing the numerical system to a larger audience, since many had forgotten about it. [22] Mathematician Detlef Spalt claimed that King exaggerated the system's importance and made mistakes in applying the system in the book devoted to it. [23] Moritz Wedell, however, called the book a "lucid description" and a "comprehensive review of the history of research" concerning the monks' ciphers. [24]

Notes

  1. ↑
    A copy of the ciphers in a treatise on penmanship (c. 1300 CE) commonly attributed to John of Tilbury, with the corresponding Basingstoke numerical values. Ars notaria with Basingstoke values.png
    A copy of the ciphers in a treatise on penmanship (c. 1300 CE) commonly attributed to John of Tilbury, with the corresponding Basingstoke numerical values.
    Basingstoke's biographer claimed that he learned his system from his teacher in Athens. However, there is no known parallel among Greek numbering systems. It seems more likely that Basingstoke picked up the idea of alphabetic numerical notation in Greece and applied it to an English ars notaria, such as the one at right, commonly attributed to John of Tilbury. [1]
  2. ↑ Cistercian numerals are not supported by Unicode, and are here substituted with Chao tone letters. Depending on the fonts you have installed, it may be that only the ones and twos will display properly. (The Under-ConScript Unicode Registry has tentatively assigned the units to PUA values U+EBA1 to U+EBAF.) [14]

Related Research Articles

The ten Arabic numerals are the most commonly used symbols for writing numbers. The term often also implies a positional notation number with a decimal base, in particular when contrasted with Roman numerals. However the symbols are also used to write numbers in other bases, such as octal, as well as non-numerical information such as trademarks or license plate identifiers.

Chinese numerals are words and characters used to denote numbers in written Chinese.

The duodecimal system, also known as base twelve or dozenal, is a positional numeral system using twelve as its base. In duodecimal, the number twelve is denoted "10", meaning 1 twelve and 0 units; in the decimal system, this number is instead written as "12" meaning 1 ten and 2 units, and the string "10" means ten. In duodecimal, "100" means twelve squared, "1000" means twelve cubed, and "0.1" means a twelfth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maya numerals</span> System used by the ancient Mayan civilization to represent numbers and dates

The Mayan numeral system was the system to represent numbers and calendar dates in the Maya civilization. It was a vigesimal (base-20) positional numeral system. The numerals are made up of three symbols: zero, one and five. For example, thirteen is written as three dots in a horizontal row above two horizontal bars; sometimes it is also written as three vertical dots to the left of two vertical bars. With these three symbols, each of the twenty vigesimal digits could be written.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Numeral system</span> Notation for expressing numbers

A numeral system is a writing system for expressing numbers; that is, a mathematical notation for representing numbers of a given set, using digits or other symbols in a consistent manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman numerals</span> Numbers in the Roman numeral system

Roman numerals are a numeral system that originated in ancient Rome and remained the usual way of writing numbers throughout Europe well into the Late Middle Ages. Numbers are written with combinations of letters from the Latin alphabet, each with a fixed integer value. The modern style uses only these seven:

0 (zero) is a number representing an empty quantity. Adding 0 to any number leaves that number unchanged; in mathematical terminology, 0 is the additive identity of the integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers, as well as other algebraic structures. Multiplying any number by 0 results in 0, and consequently division by zero has no meaning in arithmetic.

In Western musical notation, the staff, also occasionally referred to as a pentagram, is a set of five horizontal lines and four spaces that each represent a different musical pitch or in the case of a percussion staff, different percussion instruments. Appropriate music symbols, depending on the intended effect, are placed on the staff according to their corresponding pitch or function. Musical notes are placed by pitch, percussion notes are placed by instrument, and rests and other symbols are placed by convention.

Greek numerals, also known as Ionic, Ionian, Milesian, or Alexandrian numerals, is a system of writing numbers using the letters of the Greek alphabet. In modern Greece, they are still used for ordinal numbers and in contexts similar to those in which Roman numerals are still used in the Western world. For ordinary cardinal numbers, however, modern Greece uses Arabic numerals.

A numerical digit or numeral is a single symbol used alone, or in combinations, to represent numbers in positional notation, such as the common base 10. The name "digit" originates from the Latin digiti meaning fingers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pentadic numerals</span> Runic notation for presenting numbers

Pentadic numerals are a notation for presenting numbers, usually by inscribing in wood or stone. The notation has been used in Scandinavia, usually in conjunction with runic calendars and inscriptions in runes.

The numbered musical notation is a cipher notation system used in mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and to some extent in Japan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, the United States and English-speaking Canada. It dates back to the system designed by Pierre Galin, known as Galin-Paris-Chevé system. It is also known as Ziffernsystem, meaning "number system" or "cipher system" in German.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scribal abbreviation</span> Abbreviations used by ancient and medieval scribes

Scribal abbreviations, or sigla, are abbreviations used by ancient and medieval scribes writing in various languages, including Latin, Greek, Old English and Old Norse.

The Suzhou numerals, also known as Sūzhōu mǎzi (蘇州碼子), is a numeral system used in China before the introduction of Hindu numerals. The Suzhou numerals are also known as huāmǎ (花碼), cǎomǎ (草碼), jīngzǐmǎ (菁仔碼), fānzǐmǎ (番仔碼) and shāngmǎ (商碼).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hindu–Arabic numeral system</span> Most common system for writing numbers

The Hindu–Arabic numeral system is a positional base-ten numeral system for representing integers; its extension to non-integers is the decimal numeral system, which is presently the most common numeral system.

Notation plays a relatively minor role in the oral traditions of Indonesian gamelan but, in Java and Bali, several systems of gamelan notation were devised beginning at the end of the 19th century, initially for archival purposes.

A numeral is a character that denotes a number. The decimal number digits 0–9 are used widely in various writing systems throughout the world, however the graphemes representing the decimal digits differ widely. Therefore Unicode includes 22 different sets of graphemes for the decimal digits, and also various decimal points, thousands separators, negative signs, etc. Unicode also includes several non-decimal numerals such as Aegean numerals, Roman numerals, counting rod numerals, Mayan numerals, Cuneiform numerals and ancient Greek numerals. There is also a large number of typographical variations of the Western Arabic numerals provided for specialized mathematical use and for compatibility with earlier character sets, such as ² or ②, and composite characters such as ½.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Counting rods</span> Small bars used for calculating in ancient East Asia

Counting rods (筭) are small bars, typically 3–14 cm long, that were used by mathematicians for calculation in ancient East Asia. They are placed either horizontally or vertically to represent any integer or rational number.

An alphabetic numeral system is a type of numeral system. Developed in classical antiquity, it flourished during the early Middle Ages. In alphabetic numeral systems, numbers are written using the characters of an alphabet, syllabary, or another writing system. Unlike acrophonic numeral systems, where a numeral is represented by the first letter of the lexical name of the numeral, alphabetic numeral systems can arbitrarily assign letters to numerical values. Some systems, including the Arabic, Georgian and Hebrew systems, use an already established alphabetical order. Alphabetic numeral systems originated with Greek numerals around 600 BC and became largely extinct by the 16th century. After the development of positional numeral systems like Hindu–Arabic numerals, the use of alphabetic numeral systems dwindled to predominantly ordered lists, pagination, religious functions, and divinatory magic.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Chrisomalis, Stephen (2010). Numerical notation : a comparative history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 350. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511676062. ISBN   978-0-511-67683-3. OCLC   630115876.
  2. 1 2 King, David A. (2001). The Ciphers of the Monks : a forgotten number-notation of the Middle Ages . Stuttgart: F. Steiner. pp. 16, 29, 34, 41. ISBN   3-515-07640-9. OCLC   48254993.
  3. 1 2 3 King, David (1993). "Rewriting history through instruments: The secrets of a medieval astrolabe from Picardy". In Anderson, R. G. W.; Bennett, J. A. & Ryan, W. F. (eds.). Making Instruments Count: Essays on Historical Scientific Instruments Presented to Gerard L'Estrange Turner. University of Michigan. ISBN   978-0860783947.
  4. ↑ King, David A. (1992). "The Ciphers of the Monks and the Astrolabe of Berselius Reconsidered". In Demidov, Sergei S.; Rowe, David; Folkerts, Menso & Scriba, Christoph J. (eds.). Amphora. Basel: Birkhäuser. pp. 375–388. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-8599-7_18. ISBN   978-3-0348-8599-7.
  5. ↑ Agrippa von Nettesheim, Heinrich Cornelius (1533). "De notis Hebraeorum et Chaldaeorum". De Occulta Philosophia (in Latin). p. 141.
  6. ↑ Meskens, Ad; Bonte, Germain; De Groot, Jacques; De Jonghe, Mieke & King, David A. (1999). "Wine-Gauging at Damme [The evidence of a late medieval manuscript]". Histoire & Mesure. 14 (1): 51–77. doi:10.3406/hism.1999.1501.
  7. ↑ Beaujouan, Guy (1950). "Les soi-disant chiffres grecs ou chaldéens (XIIe – XVIe siècle)". Revue d'histoire des sciences (in French). 3 (2): 170–174. doi:10.3406/rhs.1950.2795.
  8. ↑ Sesiano, Jacques (1985). "Un système artificiel de numérotation au Moyen Age". In Folkerts, Menso & Lindgren, Uta (eds.). Mathemata : Festschrift für Helmuth Gericke (in French). Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag. ISBN   3-515-04324-1. OCLC   12644728.
  9. ↑ King (2001 :243, 251)
  10. ↑ De Laurence, Lauron William (1915). The Great Book of Magical Art, Hindu Magic and East Indian Occultism. Chicago: De Laurence Co. p. 174.
  11. ↑ Beard, Daniel Carter (1918). The American boys' book of signs, signals and symbols. New York Public Library. Philadelphia : Lippincott. p. 92.
  12. ↑ King, David (1995). "A forgotten Cistercian system of numerical notation". Citeaux Commentarii Cistercienses. 46 (3–4): 183–217.
  13. 1 2 King (2001 :39)
  14. ↑ "Character Encodings - Private Use Agreements - Under-ConScript Unicode Registry - Cistercian Numerals". www.kreativekorp.com. Retrieved 6 April 2021.
  15. ↑ R.Ugalde, Laurence. "Cistercian numerals in Fōrmulæ programming language". Fōrmulæ. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
  16. ↑ King (2001 :427)
  17. ↑ King (2001 :156, 214)
  18. ↑ King (2001 :182–185)
  19. ↑ King (2001 :210)
  20. ↑ Høyrup, Jens (2008). "Book review". Annals of Science. 65 (2): 306–308.
  21. ↑ King, D.A. (2001). The Ciphers of the Monks: A Forgotten Number-notation of the Middle Ages. F. Steiner. ISBN   9783515076401 . Retrieved 2015-08-13.
  22. ↑ Moyer, Ann (2003). "Book review". Speculum. 78 (3): 919–921. doi:10.1017/S0038713400132002. JSTOR   20060835 . Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  23. ↑ Spalt, Detlef (2004). "Book review". Sudhoffs Archiv (in German). 88 (1): 108–109. JSTOR   20777934 . Retrieved 2021-01-08.
  24. ↑ Wedell, Moritz (2003). "Buchbesprechung". Zeitschrift für Germanistik (in German). 13 (3): 671–673.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.