Colobops

Last updated

Colobops
Temporal range: Middle Norian 214–210  Ma
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
Colobops skull reconstruction.jpg
A 3D reconstruction of the skull of Colobops, based on scan data obtained by Pritchard et al. (2018)
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Superorder: Lepidosauria
Order: Rhynchocephalia
Suborder: Sphenodontia
Genus: Colobops
Pritchard et al., 2018
Species:
C. noviportensis
Binomial name
Colobops noviportensis
Pritchard et al., 2018

Colobops is a genus of reptile from the Late Triassic of Connecticut. [1] [2] Only known from a tiny skull (estimated total length of 2.8 centimeters or 1.1 inches long), [3] this reptile has been interpreted to possess skull attachments for very strong jaw muscles. This may have given it a very strong bite, despite its small size. [1] However, under some interpretations of the CT scan data, Colobops's bite force may not have been unusual compared to other reptiles. [2] The generic name, Colobops, is a combination of κολοβός (kolobós), meaning shortened, and ὤψ (ṓps), meaning face. This translation, "shortened face", refers to its short and triangular skull. Colobops is known from a single species, Colobops noviportensis. The specific name, noviportensis, is a latinization of New Haven, the name of both the geological setting of its discovery (the New Haven Arkose) as well as a nearby large city. The phylogenetic relations of Colobops are controversial. Its skull shares many features with those of the group Rhynchosauria, herbivorous archosauromorphs distantly related to crocodilians and dinosaurs. However, many of these features also resemble the skulls of the group Rhynchocephalia, an ancient order of reptiles including the modern tuatara, Sphenodon. [3] Although rhynchosaurs and rhynchocephalians are not closely related and have many differences in the skeleton as a whole, their skulls are remarkably similar. As Colobops is only known from a skull, it is not certain which one of these groups it belonged to. Pritchard et al. (2018) interpreted it as a basal rhynchosaur, [1] while Scheyer et al. (2020) reinterpreted it as a rhynchocephalian. [2]

Contents

History

The holotype skull of Colobops, YPM VPPU 18835, is mostly complete, although flattened and missing tooth-bearing portions of the cranial bones. The specimen was discovered in 1965 during highway construction in central Connecticut between the towns of Middletown and Meriden. [3] This locale is part of the New Haven Arkose, a subdivision of the Newark supergroup. The Newark supergroup is a collection of Late Triassic formations along the eastern coast of North America, and the New Haven Arkose has specifically been Uranium-Lead dated to the mid Norian age, about 214.0 to 209.8 million years ago. [4]

The skull was not described in an academic context until 1993, although photographs of the specimen had been featured in "A pictorial guide to fossils", a natural history book published by G.R. Case in 1982. A formal study of the specimen by Hans-Dieter Sues and Donald Baird in 1993 offered a discussion of its classification, but did not provide a scientific name for the reptile in question. This study considered the skull to lack a lacrimal bone, and noted that it originally possessed supposed fang-like premaxillary teeth at the tip of the snout which were accidentally destroyed during preparation. These features led Sues & Baird to assign the skull to Sphenodontia, a group containing most rhynchocephalians. [3]

The specimen finally received a formal name in early 2018, when a group led by Adam Pritchard provided new preparation and discussion of the skull, as well as giving it the name Colobops noviportensis. This study also included CT-scans of the specimen, proportional and numerical analyses of the enlarged temporal region, and a phylogenetic analysis in order to determine its relations. The most parsimonious results of the phylogenetic analysis indicated that the reptile was a basal rhynchosaur, although the analysis also showed that a position within Rhynchocephalia was only slightly less likely to be true. [1] A 2020 reinterpretation by Torsten Scheyer et al. argued that the skull was crushed and several bones were displaced, and that it more closely resembled a rhynchocephalian once these issues were rectified. [2]

Description

The snout of Colobops is very short, with the portion of the skull in front of the eyes occupying only a quarter of the total length of the skull. This portion of the snout is also reinforced by overlapping bones. For example, the nasal bones (on the upper side of the snout) droop down to internally brace the maxillae (bones of the side of the snout). This feature is also known in rhynchosaurs and rhynchocephalians. The maxillae are also protected by the large prefrontals (bones in front of the eyes), similar to the condition in turtles. The prefrontals are also contacted by the wide palatine bones of the roof of the mouth, similar to lepidosaurs (squamates and rhynchocephalians), as well as turtles. All of these features exist to strengthen the front part of the skull, which explains how they convergently evolved in multiple different types of reptiles. [1]

The original fossil prior to further preparation and 3D rendering Colobops skull fossil.png
The original fossil prior to further preparation and 3D rendering

Colobops also possesses large orbits (eye holes), although this may be a juvenile feature. The upper edge of each orbit is formed by the upper rear branch of a prefrontal and the upper forward branch of a postfrontal (bone behind the eye). This means that the frontals (bones of the skull roof between the eyes) are separated from the orbit, a feature which is known to a lesser degree in Sphenodon and Clevosaurus, but not rhynchosaurs. [2] Another diagnostic feature of Colobops is the fact that the skull roof possesses a very large, diamond-shaped gap between its bones, referred to as a fontanelle. Fontanelles typically can be used to characterize infant animals with skull roofs that are not completely fused. However, under the interpretation that the skull has overlapping bones and large sites for muscle attachment, the skull could be interpreted as belonging to a much older animal. A few species of modern iguanians retain their fontanelles in adulthood, and it is conceivable that Colobops was similar. [1] The presence of a fontanelle would be less unprecedented if the skull belonged to a juvenile. [2]

The rear part of the skull roof, formally known as the supratemporal area, has a pair of large holes known as supratemporal fenestrae. These holes were initially interpreted as quite broad in Colobops, similar to derived rhynchosaurs. [1] However, later analyses argued that this apparent expansion was a misinterpretation due to the squamosal being displaced and the postorbital being incomplete. [2] Only a small area of bone is present between the supratemporal fenestrae. This area of bone, formed by the fusion of the two parietal bones, has a thin sagittal crest running down its midline. This crest would have attached to powerful muscles for closing the jaw, such as the m. adductor mandibulae profundus and the m. pseudotemporalis superficialis. Colobops would have been the smallest known reptiles to possess such a powerful and expanded supratemporal area, [1] although uncertainty in the shape of the skull may oppose this interpretation. [2]

Although the braincase is only partially known, certain features can be recognized. The supraoccipital (upper part of the braincase) has small prongs which brace the parietals from behind. Unlike some lepidosaurs, Colobops possesses a fully ossified thin and tall plate-like bone known as a parasphenoid rostrum, which extends forward along the midline of the rear part of the roof of the mouth. The epipterygoids (column-like bones between the pterygoids and braincase) are large and tall, and would have been the lower attachment point for the m. pseudotemporalis superficialis. The only preserved portion of the mandible (lower jaw) was a large and pointed coronoid process near the rear part of the skull. It would have been the lower attachment point for the m. adductor mandibulae profundus. [1]

Classification

Under the interpretation that Colobops is a basal rhynchosaur, it would have been closely related to this reptile, Mesosuchus Mesosuchus BW.jpg
Under the interpretation that Colobops is a basal rhynchosaur, it would have been closely related to this reptile, Mesosuchus

In order to determine which reptile group Colobops truly belonged to, its describers (Pritchard et al.) included it within a phylogenetic analysis. Their analysis was a modified version of one originally designed by Pritchard & Nesbitt (2017) to test the affinities of the beaked drepanosaur Avicranium . With Colobops incorporated into the analysis and several character scores updated, the most parsimonious tree found that Colobops was an archosauromorph as the earliest diverging member of Rhynchosauria. This position was supported by three features of the snout and one feature of the supratemporal area. Like rhynchosaurs, Colobops had a shortened snout with a maxilla that overlaps the nasal. In addition, the supratemporal fenestrae of Colobops and rhynchosaurs are positioned high on the skull, about the same level as the upper edge of the orbit. Other archosauromorphs, such as Prolacerta , had supratemporal fenestrae in a slightly lower position, with the bones forming the outer edge of the holes being positioned about midway up the orbit. [1]

However, this classification was only slightly better supported than certain alternative interpretations. A phylogenetic analysis constructs thousands of family trees, each of which include hundreds of "steps" in evolution where analyzed traits are evolved, lost, or reacquired. The family tree with the fewest "steps", known as the most parsimonious tree (MPT), is generally considered to be the most accurate under the principle of Occam's razor. In the case of this analysis, the MPT considered Colobops to be a basal rhynchosaur. However, some family trees look completely different from the MPT despite only a being few evolutionary steps more complex. If new data is incorporated into the analysis, one of these alternative trees may become a new MPT, rewriting our knowledge of reptile classification in the process. The MPT given by Pritchard et al. (2018) is given below: [1]

Sauria
Lepidosauromorpha

Squamata

Rhynchocephalia

Archosauromorpha

Protorosaurus

Trilophosauridae

Tanystropheidae

Prolacerta

Archosauriformes

Boreopricea

Kuehneosauridae

Pamelaria

Azendohsaurus

Rhynchosauria

Colobops

Mesosuchus

Howesia

Eohyosaurus

Rhynchosauridae

Under the interpretation that Colobops is a rhynchocephalian, it would have been closely related to clevosaurs such as this reptile, Brachyrhinodon Brachyrhinodon BW.jpg
Under the interpretation that Colobops is a rhynchocephalian, it would have been closely related to clevosaurs such as this reptile, Brachyrhinodon

Prior to receiving a formal name and description, the holotype of Colobops noviportensis was actually believed to be a rhynchocephalian upon its discovery and preliminary description by Sues & Baird (1993). [3] This alternative position for Colobops was tested by Pritchard et al. in their phylogenetic analysis. The analysis found that the simplest family trees including Colobops within Rhynchocephalia were only 2 steps more complex than the MPT of the analysis, which considered it a rhynchosaur. In these trees, the closest relatives of Colobops were clevosaurs such as Clevosaurus . Two of the features which supported the assignment of Colobops as a basal rhynchosaur also happen to support its assignment as a rhynchocephalian, an example of convergent evolution between the two groups. These features include a maxilla which overlaps the nasal, and supratemporal fenestrae positioned high on the skull. In addition, the unfused frontal bones of Colobops also support a place among rhynchocephalians. The strict consensus (average result) of the simplest family trees which include Colobops within Rhynchocephalia is given below. In this strict consensus tree, the structure of Archosauromorpha is reduced to a polytomy, depicting a compromise between many family trees with competing structures but equal complexity. [1]

Sauria
Lepidosauromorpha

Squamata

Rhynchocephalia

Gephyrosaurus

Sphenodontia

Planocephalosaurus

Diphydontosaurus

Colobops

Clevosaurus

Archosauromorpha

Protorosaurus

Boreopricea

Kuehneosauridae

Pamelaria

Azendohsaurus

Trilophosauridae

Rhynchosauria

Tanystropheidae

Prolacerta

Archosauriformes

Many aspects of the anatomy of Colobops makes it difficult to evaluate its classification. One possibility is that the specimen is an infant, as supported by its large eyes, small size, and massive fontanelle in the skull roof. Juvenile specimens are notorious for jeopardizing the results of phylogenetic analyses, as diagnostic traits within adult species would not have developed yet. [1] However, the supposed massive jaw musculature of Colobops would be highly unusual for a young reptile, even compared to other rhynchosaurs (which are known to develop diagnostic traits at a young age). [5]

The redescription by Scheyer et al. (2020) expanded the data matrix with additional lepidosauromorph characteristics and taxa. In this expansion, Colobops is positioned as a rhynchocephalian next to Sphenodon (the tuatara), with a minimum of 17 steps required to place it back as a basal rhynchosaur. [2]

Paleobiology

The interpretation of Pritchard et al. (2018) supports the idea that Colobops possessed large jaw muscles. Most modern reptiles enlarge their jaw musculature by two methods, either developing large muscle receptor areas on the parietals bones in the middle of the skull, or by the supratemporal fenestrae being widened. Colobops, however, may have developed both of these methods at the same time, giving it a bite force unprecedented for its body size. This would have been further assisted by the tall coronoid process of the lower jaw. The heavily reinforced snout likely evolved in conjunction with the development of strong jaw muscles. Based on comparisons with both rhynchosaurs and rhynchocephalians, Colobops can safely be presumed to have fed using precise and strong bites, although it cannot be determined whether this was for carnivory (as in the tuatara) or herbivory (as in rhynchosaurs), as no teeth have been preserved. The bones at the edge of the jaws were broad, a condition which is shared by living lizards such as Chamaeleolis chamaeleonides (the Cuban false chameleon) and Dracaena guianensis (the Northern caiman lizard). These lizards specialize in hard-shelled prey such as crustaceans and snails. [1]

However, Scheyer et al. (2020) reinterpreted the supratemporal fenestrae as much narrower in life, with crushing and bone displacement artificially expanding the fossil. Plotting Colobops with other reptiles according to these new proportional estimates shows that Colobops did not have unusually large jaw muscles for its size. [2]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhynchocephalia</span> Order of reptiles

Rhynchocephalia is an order of lizard-like reptiles that includes only one living species, the tuatara of New Zealand. Despite its current lack of diversity, during the Mesozoic rhynchocephalians were a speciose group with high morphological and ecological diversity. The oldest record of the group is dated to the Middle Triassic around 238 to 240 million years ago, and they had achieved a worldwide distribution by the Early Jurassic. Most rhynchocephalians belong to the group Sphenodontia ('wedge-teeth'). Their closest living relatives are lizards and snakes in the order Squamata, with the two orders being grouped together in the superorder Lepidosauria.

<i>Dinocephalosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Dinocephalosaurus is a genus of long necked, aquatic protorosaur that inhabited the Triassic seas of China. The genus contains the type and only known species, D. orientalis, which was named by Li in 2003. Unlike other long-necked protorosaurs, Dinocephalosaurus convergently evolved a long neck not through elongation of individual neck vertebrae, but through the addition of neck vertebrae that each had a moderate length. As indicated by phylogenetic analyses, it belonged in a separate lineage that also included at least its closest relative Pectodens, which was named the Dinocephalosauridae in 2021. Like tanystropheids, however, Dinocephalosaurus probably used its long neck to hunt, utilizing the fang-like teeth of its jaws to ensnare prey; proposals that it employed suction feeding have not been universally accepted. It was probably a marine animal by necessity, as suggested by the poorly-ossified and paddle-like limbs which would have prevented it from going ashore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archosauromorpha</span> Infraclass of reptiles

Archosauromorpha is a clade of diapsid reptiles containing all reptiles more closely related to archosaurs rather than lepidosaurs. Archosauromorphs first appeared during the late Middle Permian or Late Permian, though they became much more common and diverse during the Triassic period.

<i>Tanystropheus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Tanystropheus is an extinct genus of archosauromorph reptile which lived during the Triassic Period in Europe, Asia, and North America. It is recognisable by its extremely elongated neck, longer than the torso and tail combined. The neck was composed of 13 vertebrae strengthened by extensive cervical ribs. Tanystropheus is one of the most well-described non-archosauriform archosauromorphs, known from numerous fossils, including nearly complete skeletons. Some species within the genus may have reached a total length of 6 meters (20 ft), making Tanystropheus the longest non-archosauriform archosauromorph as well. Tanystropheus is the namesake of the family Tanystropheidae, a clade collecting many long-necked Triassic archosauromorphs previously described as "protorosaurs" or "prolacertiforms".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhynchosaur</span> Extinct order of reptiles

Rhynchosaurs are a group of extinct herbivorous Triassic archosauromorph reptiles, belonging to the order Rhynchosauria. Members of the group are distinguished by their triangular skulls and elongated, beak like premaxillary bones. Rhynchosaurs first appeared in the Early Triassic, reaching their broadest abundance and a global distribution during the Carnian stage of the Late Triassic.

<i>Tasmaniosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Tasmaniosaurus is an extinct genus of archosauromorph reptile known from the Knocklofty Formation of West Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. The type species is T. triassicus. This genus is notable not only due to being one of the most complete Australian Triassic reptiles known, but also due to being a very close relative of Archosauriformes. Once believed to be a proterosuchid, this taxon is now believed to have been intermediate between advanced non-archosauriform archosauromorphs such as Prolacerta, and basal archosauriforms such as Proterosuchus. Features traditionally used to define Archosauria and later Archosauriformes, such as the presence of an antorbital fenestra and serrated teeth, are now known to have evolved prior to those groups due to their presence in Tasmaniosaurus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thalattosauria</span> Extinct order of sea reptiles

Thalattosauria is an extinct order of prehistoric marine reptiles that lived in the Middle to Late Triassic. Thalattosaurs were diverse in size and shape, and are divided into two superfamilies: Askeptosauroidea and Thalattosauroidea. Askeptosauroids were endemic to the Tethys Ocean, their fossils have been found in Europe and China, and they were likely semiaquatic fish eaters with straight snouts and decent terrestrial abilities. Thalattosauroids were more specialized for aquatic life and most had unusual downturned snouts and crushing dentition. Thalattosauroids lived along the coasts of both Panthalassa and the Tethys Ocean, and were most diverse in China and western North America. The largest species of thalattosaurs grew to over 4 meters (13 feet) in length, including a long, flattened tail utilized in underwater propulsion. Although thalattosaurs bore a superficial resemblance to lizards, their exact relationships are unresolved. They are widely accepted as diapsids, but experts have variously placed them on the reptile family tree among Lepidosauromorpha, Archosauromorpha, ichthyosaurs, and/or other marine reptiles.

Langobardisaurus is an extinct genus of tanystropheid archosauromorph reptile, with one valid species, L. pandolfii. Its fossils have been found in Italy and Austria, and it lived during the Late Triassic period, roughly 228 to 201 million years ago. Langobardisaurus was initially described in 1994, based on fossils from the Calcare di Zorzino Formation in Northern Italy. Fossils of the genus are also known from the Forni Dolostone of Northern Italy and the Seefeld Formation of Austria.

<i>Vancleavea</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Vancleavea is a genus of extinct, armoured, non-archosaurian archosauriforms from the Late Triassic of western North America. The type and only known species is V. campi, named by Robert Long & Phillip A Murry in 1995. At that time, the genus was only known from fragmentary bones including osteoderms and vertebrae. However, since then many more fossils have been found, including a pair of nearly complete skeletons discovered in 2002. These finds have shown that members of the genus were bizarre semiaquatic reptiles. Vancleavea individuals had short snouts with large, fang-like teeth, and long bodies with small limbs. They were completely covered with bony plates known as osteoderms, which came in several different varieties distributed around the body. Phylogenetic analyses by professional paleontologists have shown that Vancleavea was an archosauriform, part of the lineage of reptiles that would lead to archosaurs such as dinosaurs and crocodilians. Vancleavea lacks certain traits which are present in most other archosauriforms, most notably the antorbital, mandibular and supratemporal fenestrae, which are weight-saving holes in the skulls of other taxa. However, other features clearly support its archosauriform identity, including a lack of intercentra, the presence of osteoderms, an ossified laterosphenoid, and several adaptations of the femur and ankle bones. In 2016, a new genus of archosauriform, Litorosuchus, was described. This genus resembled both Vancleavea and more typical archosauriforms in different respects, allowing Litorosuchus to act as a transitional fossil linking Vancleavea to less aberrant archosauriforms.

<i>Cosesaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Cosesaurus is a genus of archosauromorph reptiles likely belonging to the family Tanystropheidae. It is known from fossil imprints of a single small skeleton, MGB V1, which was found in Muschelkalk outcrops near the municipalities of Mont-ral and Alcover in Spain. These outcrops are dated to the Ladinian age of the middle Triassic about 242 to 237 million years ago. The specimen is stored at the Museu Martorell, which is now part of the Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona. The poor preservation and likely juvenile nature of the specimen has led to the anatomy of Cosesaurus being misidentified by several different sources. For example, Paul Ellenberger claimed that it was an ancestor to birds in the 1970s, while David Peters claimed that it was a pterosaur ancestor in 2000. Both of these claims contrast with mainstream scientific theories on the origins of either group, and other paleontologists who study the specimen are unable to find the features which Ellenberger or Peters reported to be present. The Ellenberger and Peters hypotheses are thus considered fringe theories with questionable scientific soundness due to their low reproducibility. Mainstream hypotheses for the relations of Cosesaurus generally agree that it is a "protorosaur", specifically a tanystropheid closely related to long-necked reptiles such as Macrocnemus, Tanytrachelos, Tanystropheus, or Langobardisaurus.

<i>Teraterpeton</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Teraterpeton is an extinct genus of trilophosaurid archosauromorphs. It is known from a partial skeleton from the Late Triassic Wolfville Formation of Nova Scotia, described in 2003. It has many unique features seen in no other related form, including an elongated, toothless snout and large openings for the nostrils. Because of this, Teraterpeton was originally placed in its own family, Teraterpetidae, related to Trilophosaurus. Newer studies generally place it within Trilophosauridae.

<i>Jesairosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Jesairosaurus is an extinct genus of early archosauromorph reptile known from the Illizi Province of Algeria. It is known from a single species, Jesairosaurus lehmani. Although a potential relative of the long-necked tanystropheids, this lightly-built reptile could instead be characterized by its relatively short neck as well as various skull features.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protorosauria</span> Extinct order of reptiles

Protorosauria is an extinct, likely paraphyletic group of basal archosauromorph reptiles from the latest Middle Permian to the end of the Late Triassic of Asia, Europe and North America. It was named by the English anatomist and paleontologist Thomas Henry Huxley in 1871 as an order, originally to solely contain Protorosaurus. Other names which were once considered equivalent to Protorosauria include Prolacertiformes and Prolacertilia.

<i>Pamelaria</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Pamelaria is an extinct genus of allokotosaurian archosauromorph reptile known from a single species, Pamelaria dolichotrachela, from the Middle Triassic of India. Pamelaria has sprawling legs, a long neck, and a pointed skull with nostrils positioned at the very tip of the snout. Among early archosauromorphs, Pamelaria is most similar to Prolacerta from the Early Triassic of South Africa and Antarctica. Both have been placed in the family Prolacertidae. Pamelaria, Prolacerta, and various other Permo-Triassic reptiles such as Protorosaurus and Tanystropheus have often been placed in a group of archosauromorphs called Protorosauria, which was regarded as one of the most basal group of archosauromorphs. However, more recent phylogenetic analyses indicate that Pamelaria and Prolacerta are more closely related to Archosauriformes than are Protorosaurus, Tanystropheus, and other protorosaurs, making Protorosauria a polyphyletic grouping.

<i>Prolacertoides</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Prolacertoides is an extinct genus of archosauromorph reptile from the Early Triassic of China, the type species being Prolacertoides jimusarensis. Prolacertoides means 'like Prolacerta', in reference to Prolacerta, another genus of archosauromorph which Prolacertoides was once believed to have been closely related to. Prolacertoides is known from a single partial skull, IVPP V3233, which was discovered in Xinjiang in northwestern China. The locality of its discovery belongs to the Cangfanggou Group of the Jiucaiyuan Formation, which is dated to the Induan age of the very early Triassic.

<i>Vadasaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Vadasaurus is an extinct genus of rhynchocephalian closely related to the aquatic pleurosaurids. Although this genus was not as specialized as the eel-like pleurosaurs for aquatic life, various skeletal features support the idea that it had a semiaquatic lifestyle. The type species, Vadasaurus herzogi, was described and named in 2017. It was discovered in the Solnhofen Limestone in Germany, which is dated to the Late Jurassic. The generic name "Vadasaurus" is derived from "vadare", which is Latin for "to go" or "to walk forth", and "saurus", which means "lizard". "Vadare" is the root of the English word "wade", which is the reason it was chosen for this genus, in reference to its perceived semiaquatic habits. The specific name, "herzogi", refers to Werner Herzog, a Bavarian filmmaker.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clevosaurs</span> Family of reptiles

Clevosaurs are an extinct group of rhynchocephalian reptiles from the Triassic and Jurassic periods.

<i>Kadimakara australiensis</i> Extinct species of reptile

Kadimakara is an extinct genus of early archosauromorph reptile from the Arcadia Formation of Queensland, Australia. It was seemingly a very close relative of Prolacerta, a carnivorous reptile which possessed a moderately long neck. The generic name Kadimakara references prehistoric creatures from Aboriginal myths which may have been inspired by ice-age megafauna. The specific name K. australiensis relates to the fact that it was found in Australia. Prolacerta and Kadimakara were closely related to the Archosauriformes, a successful group which includes archosaurs such as crocodilians, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs.

Boreopricea is an extinct genus of archosauromorph reptile from the Early Triassic of arctic Russia. It is known from a fairly complete skeleton discovered in a borehole on Kolguyev Island, though damage to the specimen and loss of certain bones has complicated study of the genus. Boreopricea shared many similarities with various other archosauromorphs, making its classification controversial. Various studies have considered it a close relative of Prolacerta, tanystropheids, both, or neither. Boreopricea is unique among early archosauromorphs due to possessing contact between the jugal and squamosal bones at the rear half of the skull.

Fraxinisaura is an extinct genus of basal lepidosauromorph reptile known from the Middle Triassic of Germany. The only known species is Fraxinisaura rozynekae. It possessed an elongated snout, unique features of the teeth, and an ilium which was intermediate in orientation between sphenodontians and squamates. Based on characteristics of the maxilla, it is considered a close relative of Marmoretta from the Middle Jurassic of the United Kingdom, resolving a ghost lineage between that genus and other Triassic basal lepidosauromorphs.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Pritchard, Adam C.; Gauthier, Jacques A.; Hanson, Michael; Bever, Gabriel S.; Bhullar, Bhart-Anjan S. (2018-03-23). "A tiny Triassic saurian from Connecticut and the early evolution of the diapsid feeding apparatus". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 1213. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.1213P. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03508-1. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   5865133 . PMID   29572441.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Scheyer, Torsten M.; Spiekman, Stephan N. F.; Sues, Hans-Dieter; Ezcurra, Martín D.; Butler, Richard J.; Jones, Marc E. H. (25 March 2020). "Colobops: a juvenile rhynchocephalian reptile (Lepidosauromorpha), not a diminutive archosauromorph with an unusually strong bite". Royal Society Open Science. 7 (3): 192179. Bibcode:2020RSOS....792179S. doi: 10.1098/rsos.192179 . PMC   7137947 . PMID   32269817.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Sues, Hans-Dieter; Baird, Donald (1993). "A Skull of a Sphenodontian Lepidosaur from the New Haven Arkose (Upper Triassic: Norian) of Connecticut". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 13 (3): 370–372. doi:10.1080/02724634.1993.10011517. JSTOR   4523519.
  4. Wang, Z.S.; Rasbury, E.T.; Hanson, G.N.; Meyers, W.J. (1998-08-01). "Using the U-Pb system of calcretes to date the time of sedimentation of clastic sedimentary rocks". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 62 (16): 2823–2835. Bibcode:1998GeCoA..62.2823W. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00201-4. ISSN   0016-7037.
  5. Benton, Michael J.; Kirkpatrick, Ruth (July 1989). "Heterochrony in a fossil reptile: juveniles of the rhynchosaur Scaphonyx fischeri from the Late Triassic of Brazil" (PDF). Palaeontology. 32 (2): 335–353.