Part of a series on |
Dutch grammar |
---|
Dutch verbs |
Dutch nouns |
Dutch orthography |
Dutch phonology |
This article explains the conjugation of verbs in Dutch by their classification, which is based on conjugational class and derivation. These classifications describe different aspects of verb structure and usage.
Dutch verbs can be grouped by their conjugational class, as follows:
Another way to group verbs is by the type of derivation. The following can be distinguished:
Most of this article shows the conjugation of basic verbs. The differences in prefixed and separable verbs are described here, and can be applied to any verb regardless of conjugation.
Prefixed verbs are verbs whose stem begins with an unstressed prefix. The prefix is usually one of be-, ge-, her-, ont-, ver-, but others are also possible, often derived from adverbs or prepositions. Prefixed verbs are conjugated like basic verbs, except in the past participle. In the past participle, the inflectional prefix ge- is replaced by the verb's own prefix, and it is not added on. The past participle of her-openen ("to reopen") is her-opend (not *ge-her-opend), and for be-talen ("to pay") it is be-taald (not *ge-be-taald).
In some cases, two verbs exist that are spelled identically, but with one treating an adverb as a prefix, while the other treats it as separable. Such pairs are stressed and thus pronounced differently, and accent marks are sometimes written when there is a chance of confusion: voorkómen ("to prevent", prefixed) versus vóórkomen ("to occur", separable), or onder-gáán ("to undergo", prefixed) versus ónder-gaan ("to go under, to set", separable).
Prefixed verbs can be derived from basic verbs or from another prefixed verb. With the prefix her- ("again, re-"), it is also possible to derive prefixed verbs from separable verbs, but such verbs are often defective, with the separated (V2-affected) forms often being avoided by speakers. For example, the verb her-in-richten ("to rearrange, to redecorate") is a combination of the prefix her- and the separable verb in-richten. According to the syntactical rules, this must become Ik richt de kamer herin. ("I redecorate the room"), but using herin as a separable particle is often avoided as it is not an independent word[ clarification needed ] (unlike the separable particles of most other verbs). Many speakers choose to rephrase it using the adverb opnieuw ("again, anew"): Ik richt de kamer opnieuw in. In subordinate clauses or with a non-finite verb, there is less objection: Mijn vriend keek toe, terwijl ik de kamer herinrichtte. ("My friend looked on, while I redecorated the room.") or Ik heb de kamer heringericht. ("I have redecorated the room.").
Compound verbs borrowed from French or Latin are conjugated like prefixed verbs, but their past participle is made with ge-: con-strueren ("to construct"), ge-con-strueerd; pro-duceren ("to produce"), ge-pro-duceerd (cf. German pro-duziert, kon-struiert).
Separable verbs are combinations of a main verb (which can be basic or prefixed) and a particle. This particle is usually an adverb, but sometimes it can be a direct object or adjective instead. The particle is stressed more strongly than the main verb, which distinguishes separable verbs from prefixed verbs in pronunciation. The main verb of a separable verb is conjugated like it otherwise would, and can be basic (with ge- in the past participle) or prefixed (without ge-).
The particle is treated syntactically as a separate verb, and is placed before or after the main verb as syntax dictates:
The following table shows some examples of this in practice (the hyphens serve to highlight the various verb parts, but are not part of the official orthography for these verbs):
Infinitive | With V2 | Without V2 (subordinate clause) | Without V2 (non-finite verb) |
---|---|---|---|
om-vallen ("to fall over") basic main verb, strong class 7 | Ik val om. I fall over. | Hij ziet niet dat ik om-val. He doesn't see that I fall over. | Ik ben om-ge-vallen. I have fallen over. |
uit-komen ("to come true") basic main verb, strong class 4 | Mijn wens kwam vandaag uit. My wish came true today. | Het is ongelooflijk dat mijn wens vandaag uit-kwam. It is unbelievable that my wish came true today. | Mijn wens is vandaag uit-ge-komen. My wish has come true today. |
uit-betalen ("to pay out") prefixed main verb, weak in -d | Gisteren betaalde zij het geld uit. Yesterday she paid out the money. | Ik weet niet of zij het geld gisteren uit-betaalde. I don't know if she paid out the money yesterday. | Zij heeft het geld uit-betaald. She has paid out the money. |
Dutch verbs conjugate for tense in present and past, and for mood in indicative, subjunctive and imperative. The subjunctive mood in Dutch is archaic or formal, and is rarely used. There are two grammatical numbers (singular and plural) and three grammatical persons. However, many forms are identical to others, so the conjugation does not have distinct forms for all possible combinations of these factors (that is, there is considerable syncretism). In particular, there is always just one form for the plural, and only in the present indicative is there a clear distinction among the different singular persons.
Each second-person pronoun may have its own form. The following can be distinguished:
All regular verbs, whether weak, strong or mixed, form the present tense in the same way. This also includes the infinitive and present participle. Only the formation of the past tense differs among regular verbs, depending on whether the verb is strong, weak or mixed. The endings are as follows:
Infinitive | -en | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Weak past | Strong past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | – | -de, -te | – |
2nd sg jij | -t1 2 | – | ||
2nd sg+pl gij | -t1 | -de(t), -te(t)3 | -t1 3 | |
2nd sg+pl u | -de, -te | – | ||
3rd sg hij, zij, het | – | |||
pl wij, jullie, zij | -en | -den, -ten | -en | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | -e | -de, -te | -e |
pl wij, jullie, zij | -en | -den, -ten | -en | |
Imperative | General | – | ||
Plural | -t1 | |||
Participles | -end | (ge-) -d, (ge-) -t1 4 | (ge-) -en4 |
Notes:
All forms of a given regular verb can be predicted from just three forms, or sometimes four. These are the principal parts of a verb.
In the sections that follow, only the principal parts of each verb are given when this is sufficient to describe the full conjugation of the verb.
As noted above, the present tense of all regular verbs is formed in the same way, and follows the same rules. The following table shows the conjugation of two verbs in the present tense:
Infinitive | vullen ("to fill") | leren ("to learn, to teach") | |
---|---|---|---|
Indicative mood | 1st sg ik | vul | leer |
2nd sg jij | vult | leert | |
2nd sg+pl gij | |||
2nd sg+pl u | |||
3rd sg hij, zij, het | |||
pl wij, jullie, zij | vullen | leren | |
Subjunctive mood | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | vulle | lere |
pl wij, jullie, zij | vullen | leren | |
Imperative mood | General | vul | leer |
Plural | vult | leert | |
Participle | vullend | lerend |
If the stem ends in -v or -z, then these are spelled -f and -s at the end of a syllable.
Infinitive | leven ("to live") | blozen ("to blush") | |
---|---|---|---|
Indicative mood | 1st sg ik | leef | bloos |
2nd sg jij | leeft | bloost | |
2nd sg+pl gij | |||
2nd sg+pl u | |||
3rd sg hij, zij, het | |||
pl wij, jullie, zij | leven | blozen | |
Subjunctive mood | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | leve | bloze |
pl wij, jullie, zij | leven | blozen | |
Imperative mood | General | leef | bloos |
Plural | leeft | bloost | |
Participle | levend | blozend |
If the stem ends in -t, then no additional -t ending is added when this would otherwise be required, as a word cannot end in a double consonant (-tt in this case) in Dutch spelling. This makes all present singular forms identical.
Infinitive | zetten ("to set, to place") | |
---|---|---|
Indicative mood | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | zet |
pl wij, jullie, zij | zetten | |
Subjunctive mood | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | zette |
pl wij, jullie, zij | zetten | |
Imperative mood | All | zet |
Participle | zettend |
The past tense is formed differently depending on whether the verb is weak, strong or mixed.
Weak verbs are the most common type of verb in Dutch, and the only productive type (all newly created verbs are weak, except most new formations with a strong-verb stem). They form their past tense with an ending containing a dental consonant, -d- or -t-.
Whether -d- or -t- is used depends on the final pronounced phoneme of the verb stem as it sounds in the infinitive verb form. If the stem ends in a voiceless consonant, then -t- is used, otherwise -d-. It is often summarised with the mnemonic "'t kofschip": if the verb stem ends with one of the consonants of 't kofschip (t, k, f, s, ch, p), then the past tense will have -t-. However, it also applies for c, q and x and any other letter that is voiceless in pronunciation.
The following tables show the past tense forms of a weak verb with a past tense in -d- (stem does not end in voiceless consonant), and with a past tense in -t- (stem ends in voiceless consonant).
Infinitive | vullen ("to fill") | werken ("to work") | |
---|---|---|---|
Indicative mood | 1st sg ik | vulde | werkte |
2nd sg jij | |||
2nd sg+pl gij | vulde(t) | werkte(t) | |
2nd sg+pl u | vulde | werkte | |
3rd sg hij, zij, het | |||
pl wij, jullie, zij | vulden | werkten | |
Subjunctive mood | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | vulde | werkte |
pl wij, jullie, zij | vulden | werkten | |
Participle | gevuld | gewerkt |
If the stem ends in -v or -z, then these are spelled -f and -s at the end of a syllable, as in the present tense. However, they are still pronounced as voiced /v/ and /z/ when the past tense ending is added, so the stem is still considered voiced, and the past tense-endings contain -d-:
If the stem ends in -d or -t, then no ending is added in the past participle, as a word cannot end in a double consonant (-dd or -tt in this case) in Dutch spelling, with few exceptions. The past tense stem will be pronounced the same as the present, but it is still spelled with -dd- or -tt-, even when the spelling rules would otherwise allow this to be simplified. Thus:
Compare this to English set, which has a similar homophony between present and past.
Weak verbs with stems ending in a vowel sound also have past-tense forms with -d-:
Strong verbs form their past tenses by changing the vowel of the stem, a process known as ablaut. There are far fewer strong verbs than weak verbs in Dutch, but many of the most commonly used verbs are strong, so they are encountered frequently. There are about 200 strong roots, giving rise to about 1500 strong verbs in total, if all derived verbs with separable and inseparable prefixes are included.
Strong verbs use a different set of endings from weak verbs. However, the same rules for final -t, -v, -z apply.
Infinitive | schijnen ("to shine") | geven ("to give") | sluiten ("to close") | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indicative mood | 1st sg ik | scheen | gaf | sloot |
2nd sg jij | ||||
2nd sg+pl gij | scheent | gaaft | ||
2nd sg+pl u | scheen | gaf | ||
3rd sg hij, zij, het | ||||
pl wij, jullie, zij | schenen | gaven | sloten | |
Subjunctive mood | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | schene | gave | slote |
pl wij, jullie, zij | schenen | gaven | sloten | |
Participle | geschenen | gegeven | gesloten |
The vowels that occur in present and past are not random, but follow clear patterns. These patterns can be divided into seven "classes", some with subgroups. Some verbs are a mixture of two classes or belong to none of the existing classes.
In the following subsections, the vowel patterns of each class are described. For clarity, long vowels are always written doubled in the patterns. In the actual conjugated verb, they will be single or double according to normal Dutch spelling rules.
Class 1 follows the vowel pattern ij-ee-ee:
Class 2 is divided into two subclasses.
Class 2a follows the vowel pattern ie-oo-oo:
Class 2b follows the vowel pattern ui-oo-oo:
The verbs vriezen and verliezen show grammatischer Wechsel, with s/z changing to r in the past tense:
Class 3 is divided into two subclasses.
Class 3a follows the vowel pattern i-o-o:
The vowel is usually followed by m or n and another consonant.
Class 3b follows e-o-o:
The vowel is usually followed by l or r and another consonant.
Class 4 follows the vowel pattern ee-a/aa-oo:
The vowel in these verbs is usually followed by l, r, m or n and no other consonant.
The verb komen has an irregular pattern with short o in the present singular, long oo in the remaining present tense, and an additional w in the past:
Class 5 follows the vowel pattern ee-a/aa-ee, with the same change in length as in class 4:
The vowel is usually followed by an obstruent consonant.
The verbs bidden, liggen and zitten follow the pattern i-a/aa-ee instead:
These three verbs are descended from the old Germanic j-present verbs, which had an additional suffix -j- before the endings in the present tense. This suffix caused doubling of the preceding consonant (the West Germanic gemination) and changed the preceding vowel from e to i.
The verb eten is regular but has an extra -g- in the past participle:
Originally, it was simply geten, contracted from earlier ge-eten. An additional ge- was added on later. Compare German essen, gegessen, which shows the same development.
Class 6 follows the vowel pattern aa-oe-aa. It is the smallest of the strong verb classes, with only a few verbs.
Class 7 follows the vowel pattern X-ie-X, where the two X's are identical. There were originally five subgroups depending on the vowel of the present tense. Class 7a (with ee or ei in the present) has disappeared in Dutch, so only four subgroups remain.
Class 7b has oo in the present tense:
Class 7c has a in the present tense:
Two verbs have shortened the past tense vowel to i:
In present tense of the verb houden, the original combination -ald- underwent L-vocalization, and became -oud-.
It also has an alternative form which lacks -d when it occurs at the end: hou alongside the regular houd.
Class 7d has aa in the present tense:
Class 7e has oe in the present tense:
Several strong verbs have vowel patterns that do not fit with any of the above types.
A number of class 3b strong verbs have replaced their original past tense vowel with the -ie- of class 7, creating a "hybrid" class. The past participle vowel o of class 3 remains.
The verb worden also belonged to class 3b, but the past and present vowels appear to have been swapped:
Contrast this with German werden, which kept the older vowel.
Class 6 originally had three j-present verbs, like liggen of class 5. These verbs originally followed the pattern e-oe-aa. All three have changed this in one way or another in modern Dutch:
Three verbs appear to follow a class 3b pattern, but have a long vowel instead of a short one:
The verb uitscheiden is the only remaining class 7a verb, but it now has a class 1 past (note that ei and ij are pronounced the same):
Even the form scheed uit is falling out of use, and is being replaced with a weak past scheidde uit, making it a mixed verb.
Some verbs have a mixture of strong and weak forms. These are called "mixed verbs" and are relatively common in Dutch. Most mixed verbs are originally strong verbs that have replaced some strong forms with weak forms. However, a few were originally weak but have become strong by analogy.
The most common type of mixed verb has a weak past tense, but a strong past participle in -en. Most mixed verbs of this type have the same vowel in the present and in the past participle, and therefore appear to be original class 6 and 7 verbs. A few still have the older strong past as an archaic form.
Mixed verbs that originally had class 6 pasts:
Mixed verbs that originally had class 7 pasts:
Mixed verbs from other classes:
A smaller group of verbs, all belonging to class 6, has the reverse situation. The past tense is strong, but the past participle is weak.
The following verbs are very irregular, and may not fit neatly into the strong-weak split.
An important subset of these verbs are the preterite-present verbs, which are shared by all Germanic languages. In the present tense, they originally conjugated like the past tense of a strong verb. In Dutch, this means that they lack the -t in the third-person singular present indicative, much like their English equivalents which lack the -s. Their past tense forms are weak, but irregularly so. Most of these verbs have become auxiliary verbs, so they may be missing imperative forms, and perhaps the participles as well.
The verb zijn "to be" is suppletive, and uses a different root in the present and past. Its present tense is highly irregular, and the past shows grammatischer Wechsel like the strong verb vriezen (s/z becomes r). The subjunctive mood is generally considered archaic.
Infinitive | zijn, wezen [4] , bennen [5] "to be" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | ben | was |
2nd sg jij | bent | ||
2nd sg+pl gij | zijt | waart | |
2nd sg+pl u | bent, is [6] , zijt (rare) | was | |
3rd sg hij, zij, het | is | ||
pl wij, jullie, zij | zijn [7] | waren | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | zij, weze | ware |
pl wij, jullie, zij | zijn, wezen | waren | |
Imperative | General [8] | wees, zij [9] , ben [10] | - |
Plural [11] | weest, zijt [9] | - | |
Participles | zijnd, wezend | geweest |
The verb hebben "to have" is weak in origin, but has many other irregularities.
Infinitive | hebben "to have" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | heb | had |
2nd sg jij | hebt | ||
2nd sg+pl gij | hadt | ||
2nd sg+pl u | hebt, heeft | had | |
3rd sg hij, zij, het | heeft | ||
pl wij, jullie, zij | hebben | hadden | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | hebbe | hadde |
pl wij, jullie, zij | hebben | hadden | |
Imperative | General | heb | - |
Plural | hebt | - | |
Participles | hebbend | gehad |
The verb weten is regular in the present. The past ends in -st.
Infinitive | weten "to know (have knowledge)" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | weet | wist |
pl wij, jullie, zij | weten | wisten | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | wete | wiste |
pl wij, jullie, zij | weten | wisten | |
Imperative | All | weet | - |
Participles | wetend | geweten |
The verb moeten is very similar to weten.
Infinitive | moeten "must, to have to" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | moet | moest |
pl wij, jullie, zij | moeten | moesten | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | moete | moeste |
pl wij, jullie, zij | moeten | moesten | |
Imperative | — | ||
Participles | moetend | gemoeten |
The verb mogen is relatively regular. It has a vowel change in the present between singular and plural, reflecting the original vowel change between the singular and plural strong past. The past ends in -cht.
Infinitive | mogen "may, to be allowed" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | mag | mocht |
2nd sg jij | |||
2nd sg+pl gij | moogt | ||
2nd sg+pl u | mag | ||
3rd sg hij, zij, het | |||
pl wij, jullie, zij | mogen | mochten | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | moge | mochte |
pl wij, jullie, zij | mogen | mochten | |
Imperative | — | ||
Participles | mogend | gemogen, gemoogd, gemocht |
The verb kunnen also has a vowel change in the present, and a variety of alternative forms. In the past tense, it has both a vowel change and, in the plural, the weak dental suffix. With 'u' and 'jij' both 'kunt' and 'kan' are possible. While 'kan' is usually used in speech, in writing 'kunt' is preferred in the Netherlands. 'Kan' is considered to be more informal. [12] [13]
Infinitive | kunnen "can, to be able" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | kan | kon |
2nd sg jij | kunt, kan | ||
2nd sg+pl gij | kunt | kondt | |
2nd sg+pl u | kunt, kan | kon | |
3rd sg hij, zij, het | kan | ||
pl wij, jullie, zij | kunnen | konden | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | kunne | konde |
pl wij, jullie, zij | kunnen | konden | |
Imperative | — | ||
Participles | kunnende | gekund |
The verb zullen is the most irregular of the preterite-presents. In the present, the forms strongly resemble those of kunnen. The past is different, and has changed earlier -old- to -oud-, and then dropped the -d- in many forms.
Like its English equivalent would, the past tense zou does not literally indicate past time. Instead, the distinction is one of certainty: the present indicates certain future time, while the past indicates a conditional event. Compare:
Infinitive | zullen "will, shall, to be going to" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | zal | zou |
2nd sg jij | zult, zal | ||
2nd sg+pl gij | zult | zoudt | |
2nd sg+pl u | zult, zal | zou | |
3rd sg hij, zij, het | zal | ||
pl wij, jullie, zij | zullen | zouden | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | zulle | zoude |
pl wij, jullie, zij | zullen | zouden | |
Imperative | — | ||
Participles | zullend | — |
The verb willen is not a preterite-present verb in origin, but nowadays it inflects much the same.
There are two different past tense forms. The original form wou(den) has a change of -old- to -oud-, like in zullen, but this form is now considered colloquial or dialectal. The newer, regular form wilde(n) is considered more standard.
Infinitive | willen "to want" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | wil | wilde, wou |
2nd sg jij | wil(t) | ||
2nd sg+pl gij | wilt | wilde(t), woudt | |
2nd sg+pl u | wilt, wil | wilde, wou | |
3rd sg hij, zij, het | wil | ||
pl wij, jullie, zij | willen | wilden, wouden | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | wille | wilde, woude |
pl wij, jullie, zij | willen | wilden, wouden | |
Imperative | General | wil | - |
Plural | wilt | - | |
Participles | willend | gewild |
A handful of common verbs have a stem ending in a vowel in the present tense. The endings contract with the stem, losing any -e- in the ending. The following table shows an example.
Infinitive | gaan ("to go") | |
---|---|---|
Indicative mood | 1st sg ik | ga |
2nd sg jij | ga(at) | |
2nd sg+pl gij | gaat | |
2nd sg+pl u | ||
3rd sg hij, zij, het | ||
pl wij, jullie, zij | gaan | |
Subjunctive mood | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | ga |
pl wij, jullie, zij | gaan | |
Imperative mood | General | ga |
Plural | gaat | |
Participle | gaand |
The verbs have a variety of past tense forms, reflecting their differing origins:
A few verbs form their past irregularly because of an early Germanic development called the "Germanic spirant law". Both the vowel and the consonant change, sometimes in rather unexpected ways. However, these verbs are still weak even though the vowel changes, because the past tense and participle have a dental suffix (-t-). The vowel change is not caused by ablaut (which is the origin of the vowel changes in strong verbs), but by an entirely different phenomenon called Rückumlaut.
Six verbs have this type of conjugation. Note that their English equivalents often have similar changes.
The verb zeggen ("to say") is weak, but is often conjugated irregularly in the past. There is also a regular conjugation, which is more common in the south. In some dialects, a similar conjugation is followed for leggen ("to lay").
Infinitive | zeggen "to say" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mood | Person | Present | Past |
Indicative | 1st sg ik | zeg | zei, zegde |
2nd sg jij | zeg(t) | ||
2nd sg+pl gij | zegt | zeidt, zegde(t) | |
2nd sg+pl u | zei, zegde | ||
3rd sg hij, zij, het | |||
pl wij, jullie, zij | zeggen | zeiden, zegden | |
Subjunctive | ik jij, gij, u hij, zij, het | zegge | zeide, zegde |
pl wij, jullie, zij | zeggen | zeiden, zegden | |
Imperative | General | zeg | |
Plural | zegt | ||
Participles | zeggend | gezegd |
In the Germanic languages, weak verbs are by far the largest group of verbs, and are therefore often regarded as the norm. They are distinguished from the Germanic strong verbs by the fact that their past tense form is marked by an inflection containing a, , or sound rather than by changing the verb's root vowel.
Verbs in the Finnish language can be divided into six main groups depending on the stem type, both for formal analysis and for teaching the language to non-native speakers. All six types have the same set of personal endings, but the stems assume different suffixes and undergo (slightly) different changes when inflected.
The Germanic language family is one of the language groups that resulted from the breakup of Proto-Indo-European (PIE). It in turn divided into North, West and East Germanic groups, and ultimately produced a large group of mediaeval and modern languages, most importantly: Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish (North); English, Dutch and German (West); and Gothic.
In the Germanic languages, a strong verb is a verb that marks its past tense by means of changes to the stem vowel. A minority of verbs in any Germanic language are strong; the majority are weak verbs, which form the past tense by means of a dental suffix.
The English language has many irregular verbs, approaching 200 in normal use – and significantly more if prefixed forms are counted. In most cases, the irregularity concerns the past tense or the past participle. The other inflected parts of the verb – the third person singular present indicative in -[e]s, and the present participle and gerund form in -ing – are formed regularly in most cases. There are a few exceptions: the verb be has irregular forms throughout the present tense; the verbs have, do, and say have irregular -[e]s forms; and certain defective verbs lack most inflection.
Conjugation is the variation in the endings of verbs (inflections) depending on the person, tense and mood. Most French verbs are regular and their inflections can be entirely determined by their infinitive form. If not regular, a verb may incur changes its stem, changes in the endings or spelling adjustments for the sake of keeping correct pronunciation.
In linguistics, apophony is an alternation of vowel (quality) within a word that indicates grammatical information.
German verbs may be classified as either weak, with a dental consonant inflection, or strong, showing a vowel gradation (ablaut). Both of these are regular systems. Most verbs of both types are regular, though various subgroups and anomalies do arise; however, textbooks for learners often class all strong verbs as irregular. The only completely irregular verb in the language is sein. There are more than 200 strong and irregular verbs, but just as in English, there is a gradual tendency for strong verbs to become weak.
German verbs are conjugated depending on their use: as in English, they are modified depending on the persons (identity) and number of the subject of a sentence, as well as depending on the tense and mood.
In Hebrew, verbs, which take the form of derived stems, are conjugated to reflect their tense and mood, as well as to agree with their subjects in gender, number, and person. Each verb has an inherent voice, though a verb in one voice typically has counterparts in other voices. This article deals mostly with Modern Hebrew, but to some extent, the information shown here applies to Biblical Hebrew as well.
Ukrainian grammar is complex and characterised by a high degree of inflection; moreover, it has a relatively free word order, although the dominant arrangement is subject–verb–object (SVO). Ukrainian grammar describes its phonological, morphological, and syntactic rules. Ukrainian has seven grammatical cases and two numbers for its nominal declension and two aspects, three tenses, three moods, and two voices for its verbal conjugation. Adjectives agree in number, gender, and case with their nouns.
Bulgarian conjugation is the creation of derived forms of a Bulgarian verb from its principal parts by inflection. It is affected by person, number, gender, tense, mood and voice. Bulgarian verbs are conventionally divided into three conjugations according to the thematic vowel they use in the present tense:
Wayuu, or Guajiro, is a major Arawakan language spoken by 400,000 indigenous Wayuu people in northwestern Venezuela and northeastern Colombia on the Guajira Peninsula and surrounding Lake Maracaibo.
Sanskrit has inherited from its parent, the Proto-Indo-European language, an elaborate system of verbal morphology, much of which has been preserved in Sanskrit as a whole, unlike in other kindred languages, such as Ancient Greek or Latin. Sanskrit verbs thus have an inflection system for different combinations of tense, aspect, mood, voice, number, and person. Non-finite forms such as participles are also extensively used.
Verbs in Middle High German are divided into strong or weak verbs. Strong verbs indicate tense by a change in the quality of a vowel, while weak verbs indicate tense by the addition of an ending.
Old Norse has three categories of verbs and two categories of nouns. Conjugation and declension are carried out by a mix of inflection and two nonconcatenative morphological processes: umlaut, a backness-based alteration to the root vowel; and ablaut, a replacement of the root vowel, in verbs.
Gothic verbs have the most complex conjugation of any attested Germanic language. Most categories reconstructed for the Proto-Germanic verb system are preserved in Gothic. Knowledge of the Proto-Germanic verb is itself to a large degree based on Gothic, meaning that its reconstruction may be fragmentary.
Arabic verbs, like the verbs in other Semitic languages, and the entire vocabulary in those languages, are based on a set of two to five consonants called a root. The root communicates the basic meaning of the verb, e.g. ك-ت-ب k-t-b 'write', ق-ر-ء q-r-ʾ 'read', ء-ك-ل ʾ-k-l 'eat'. Changes to the vowels in between the consonants, along with prefixes or suffixes, specify grammatical functions such as person, gender, number, tense, mood, and voice.
A regular verb is any verb whose conjugation follows the typical pattern, or one of the typical patterns, of the language to which it belongs. A verb whose conjugation follows a different pattern is called an irregular verb. This is one instance of the distinction between regular and irregular inflection, which can also apply to other word classes, such as nouns and adjectives.
The grammar of Old Saxon is highly inflected, similar to that of Old English or Latin. As an ancient Germanic language, the morphological system of Old Saxon is similar to that of the hypothetical Proto-Germanic reconstruction, retaining many of the inflections thought to have been common in Proto-Indo-European and also including characteristically Germanic constructions such as the umlaut. Among living languages, Old Saxon morphology most closely resembles that of modern High German.