Dvinosaurus

Last updated

Contents

Dvinosaurus
Temporal range: Middle - Late Permian 265–254  Ma
Dvin egreg1DB.jpg
Life restoration of Dvinosaurus egregius
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Order: Temnospondyli
Suborder: Dvinosauria
Superfamily: Dvinosauroidea
Family: Dvinosauridae
Amalitzkii, 1921
Genus: Dvinosaurus
Amalitzky, 1921
Type species
Dvinosaurus primus
Amalitzkii, 1921
Other species
  • D. egregius
    Shishkin, 1968
  • D. purlensis
    Shishkin, 1968
  • D. campbelli
    Gubin, 2004
  • D. gubini
    Uliakhin & Golubev, 2024 [1]

Dvinosaurus is an extinct genus of amphibious temnospondyls localized to regions of western and central Russia during the middle and late Permian, approximately 265-254 million years ago. [2] Its discovery was first noted in 1921 by Russian paleontologist Vladimir Prokhorovich Amalitskii in a posthumously published paper that documents the findings of a site in Russia's Arkhangelsk District. [3] Its name is derived from the proximity of this site to the Northern Dvina River. [4]

Dvinosaurus is thought to have been a gill-breathing, fully-aquatic tetrapod, characterized by a large, triangular head, short limbs, and a long powerful tail. [3] A typical individual could grow to be approximately 40 in (100 cm) in length. [3]

Within this genus, the number of documented species has varied over the years since its discovery. Prior to his untimely death, Amalitskii described three species, Dvinosaurus primus, Dvinosaurus secundus, and Dvinosaurus tertius. [3] Upon further analysis, however, these three proposed species would be reclassified as solely D. primus as the latter two were found to be age-stages of the same species. Later in the century, Mikhail Shishkin would describe two different species of Dvinosaurus named Dvinosaurus egregius and Dvinosaurus purlensis based on specimens from a locality south of Amalitskii's original site. [5] Finally, in 2004 a new species of Dvinosaurus named D. campbelli was described by Y.M. Gubin based on deposits from the Middle Volga Region, a locality centered around the Volga River, which runs through Western Russia before draining into the Caspian Sea. [6]

History and description

History

Following his death in 1917, Amalitskii's notes and initial observations of Dvinosaurus were transferred to the Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. [7] Over the course of the next 8 years, Prof. Petr Sushkin carried out a thorough analysis of these notes in order to provide the first description of Dvinosaurus. [7] Later in the century, at a site near the small town of Vyazniki in western Russia, many more Dvinosaurus specimens were identified and analyzed by B.P. Vjuschkov and Mikhail Shishkin, who classified two new species of Dvinosaurus and added to the depiction of the genus as whole in the process. What follows is a summary and general description of their combined findings.

D. primus skull Dvinosaurus primus.JPG
D. primus skull

General description and skull

As detailed by Amalitskii and subsequently Sushkin, Dvinosaurus is roughly 40 inches in length, although some species could be larger, up to 2.5 meters. [7] [8] It featured smooth skin suited for an aquatic environment. Its head is a large, rounded triangular shape with sizable orbits that account for nearly 1/4 of the length of the skull. [7] Of note, Dvinosaurus’ skull lacks an otic notch, while also featuring a noticeably elongated occipital region. [7] Like other temnospondyls, it features large interpterygoid vacuities and a number of tusks dispersed throughout its palate. Its teeth consist of both large, recurved fangs and smaller, conical teeth, the combination of which suggests that it fed on fish or similarly sized tetrapods. [7]

Post-cranial elements

D. primus DvinosaurusDB2.jpg
D. primus

It is known that Dvinosaurus featured a highly ossified branchial skeleton just posterior to the skull that would have provided support for 4 pairs of gills. Although gills were once considered as external, later study shows that are more likely to be internal gills like fish have. [9] [10] Additionally, Dvinosaurus had a long vertebral column (pre-sacral vertebral count of 28) with short, thick ribs reminiscent of those found in Amphibia. [11] Its vertebrae also featured hemal arches. [12] Its vertebrae were rhachitomous with an enlarged intercentrum and small, paired pleurocentra. [13] The bones of its forelimbs and hindlimbs are short, stout, and display several characteristics of aquatic organisms such as incomplete ossification and flattening of limb bones. [7] Finally, prominent spinous processes found in the more caudal vertebrae indicate that Dvinosaurus possessed a powerful tail that, in combination with its short, muscular limbs, could propel it rapidly toward its prey. [7]

Variation amongst species

There is, of course, a degree of variation on this description amongst species within this genus. Most distinctions between species arise in the form of minor modifications in jaw structure, but some differences are more easily noted. [14] In D. egregious the loss of tooth rows on the coranoids and different positioning of palatal canines distinguishes this species from Amalitskii's D. primus. [15] In D. purlensis, variation is seen in the vertebral column with the fusion of the hypocentrum and pleurocentrum. [13] The most recently described species, D. campbelli is distinguished by the addition of a long interchoanal tooth row and distinct modifications to the bones of its forelimbs. It is also the largest of the species within the genus, with a measured skull length of 26 cm in contrast to a maximal length of 19.6 cm in D. primus. [12]

Paleobiology

Habitat

As previously mentioned, Dvinosaurus was a fully aquatic organism, typically occupying rivers and large streams. [7] As a byproduct of its orbits being situated on the top of its head, it is thought that Dvinosaurus preferred deeper rivers as this would allow for improved predation of the fish in the upper water levels. [7]

Dvinosaurus is found most commonly in sandy localities and are thought to have preferred highly hydrodynamic bodies of water. [8]

Feeding

Based on its pattern of dentition, Dvinosaurus was clearly carnivorous, primarily feeding on fish. It is likely that it relied on ambushing its prey by waiting on the bottom of riverbeds before quickly lunging to secure its prey. [7] [8] Within the Vyazniki locality itself, Dvinosaurus is thought to have been a mid-level predator, preying upon invertebrates, paleonisciforms, hybodontiformes, and larval forms of other aquatic tetrapods, while conversely being hunted by chroniosuchians such as Bystrowiana. [16]

Locomotion

Dvinosaurus’ primary form of movement and predation in its aquatic environment was accomplished through the use of its strong tail and limbs, unlike many of its close relatives which used a wriggling motion in their torsos for movement. [7] The unfused vertebrae featured in most species, likely provided increased flexibility of the axial skeleton, an adaptation well suited for a fully-aquatic environment. [8]

Neoteny

Interestingly, upon analysis of Dvinosaurus’ characteristics it was determined that this genus displayed a mixture of both primitive and progressive traits in relation to its larger subclass, labyrinthodonts. [11] Initially these findings were puzzling and to some were thought to be a violation of Dollo's Law, which states “an organism never returns exactly to a former state, even if it finds itself placed in conditions of existence identical to those in which it has previously lived.” [17]

The seemingly backward evolution seen in Dvinosaurus, however, is now thought instead to be neoteny, or the retention of juvenile characteristics in adult forms of an organism. This phenomenon is largely thought to be due to the environmental pressures of the later portions of the Permian. During this period, dry climate made life for land-dwelling amphibians near impossible and led to the extinction of many species of labyrinthodonts. [11] A mature, land-dwelling form of Dvinosaurus is thought to have been amongst those that went extinct, while its larval, fully-aquatic form persisted. [11] The primitive traits, such as a thin skull roof and underdeveloped sense organs, found in the larval form, and subsequently lost in the mature form, better suited a fully aquatic lifestyle, and thereby allowed Dvinosaurus to avoid extinction on land. [11] Consequently, Dvinosaurus is the only labyrinthodont present in the Northern Dvina region and is thought to be primarily represented by its larval form. [11]

Geographic distribution

The Arkhangelsk Oblast in northwestern Russia RussiaArkhangelsk2007-01.png
The Arkhangelsk Oblast in northwestern Russia

Dvinosaurus is localized almost entirely to regions of Eastern Europe, primarily in Western and Central Russia. While its distribution is restricted to regions containing rivers such as the Volga and Northern Dvina, it is thought that these localities may have undergone significant geographical shifting during continental drifts approximately 200 million years ago. [11] Several close relatives of Dvinosaurus, most notably Brachyopidae such as Brachyops , Bothriceps , and Batrachosuchus , inhabited regions of Gondwana, a supercontinent comprising present day Africa, India, South America, Australia, and Antarctica. [11] It is feasible that these relatives and Dvinosauran precursors dwelled on this supercontinent before migrating north to the regions where Dvinosaurus ultimately appears in the fossil record. [11]

There are currently 45 locations across Eastern Europe at which Dvinosaurus remains have been documented, most of which are found in the Arhangelsk district in northwestern Russia bordering the White Sea in the Arctic Ocean. [8]

Classification

Dvinosaurus belongs to the larger clade Dvinosauria, which also includes the taxa Trimerorhachis , Neldasaurus , Perryella, Acroplous , Isodectes, Slaugenhopia, Kourerpeton, Tupilakosaurus , and Thabanchuia. [18] This clade falls under the group or "order" Temnospondyli, which traditionally was classified under the larger amphibian subclass, Labyrinthodontia.

Dvinosauria 

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Labyrinthodontia</span> Paraphyletic group of tetrapodomorphs

"Labyrinthodontia" is an informal grouping of extinct predatory amphibians which were major components of ecosystems in the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. Traditionally considered a subclass of the class Amphibia, modern classification systems recognize that labyrinthodonts are not a formal natural group (clade) exclusive of other tetrapods. Instead, they consistute an evolutionary grade, ancestral to living tetrapods such as lissamphibians and amniotes. "Labyrinthodont"-grade vertebrates evolved from lobe-finned fishes in the Devonian, though a formal boundary between fish and amphibian is difficult to define at this point in time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temnospondyli</span> Ancestors of modern amphibians adapted to life on land

Temnospondyli or temnospondyls is a diverse ancient order of small to giant tetrapods—often considered primitive amphibians—that flourished worldwide during the Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic periods, with fossils being found on every continent. A few species continued into the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous periods, but all had gone extinct by the Late Cretaceous. During about 210 million years of evolutionary history, they adapted to a wide range of habitats, including freshwater, terrestrial, and even coastal marine environments. Their life history is well understood, with fossils known from the larval stage, metamorphosis and maturity. Most temnospondyls were semiaquatic, although some were almost fully terrestrial, returning to the water only to breed. These temnospondyls were some of the first vertebrates fully adapted to life on land. Although temnospondyls are amphibians, many had characteristics such as scales and armour-like bony plates that distinguish them from the modern soft-bodied lissamphibians.

<i>Scutosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Scutosaurus is an extinct genus of pareiasaur parareptiles. Its genus name refers to large plates of armor scattered across its body. It was a large anapsid reptile that, unlike most reptiles, held its legs underneath its body to support its great weight. Fossils have been found in the Sokolki Assemblage Zone of the Malokinelskaya Formation in European Russia, close to the Ural Mountains, dating to the late Permian (Lopingian) between 264 and 252 million years ago.

<i>Mastodonsaurus</i> Extinct genus of temnospondyls

Mastodonsaurus is an extinct genus of temnospondyl from the Middle Triassic of Europe. It belongs to a Triassic group of temnospondyls called Capitosauria, characterized by their large body size and presumably aquatic lifestyles. Mastodonsaurus remains one of the largest amphibians known, and may have exceeded 6 meters in length.

<i>Parotosuchus</i> Extinct genus of temnospondyls

Parotosuchus is an extinct genus of capitosaurian temnospondyls within the family Mastodonsauridae. Fossils are known from the Early Triassic of Europe, Africa, Australia, and Antarctica. It was about 2 metres (6.6 ft) long and likely lived in aquatic environments such as lakes and rivers. Parotosuchus was covered in a scaly skin, unlike the smooth skin of modern-day amphibians, and probably moved with an eel-like motion in the water.

<i>Eryosuchus</i> Extinct genus of temnospondyls

Eryosuchus is an extinct genus of capitosauroid temnospondyl from the Middle Triassic of northern Russia. It was a very large predator: the largest specimen known could reach up to 3.5 m (11.5 ft) in length, with a skull over 1 m long.

<i>Chroniosuchus</i> Extinct genus of tetrapods

Chroniosuchus is an extinct genus of chroniosuchid from the upper Permian period. The genus was first named by Vjuschkov in 1957.

<i>Kotlassia</i> Genus of reptile-like amphibians

Kotlassia extinct genus of kotlassiine seymouriamorph from the Late Permian of Russia. The type, and currently only, species is K. prima.

<i>Sclerocephalus</i> Extinct genus of amphibians

Sclerocephalus is an extinct genus of temnospondyl amphibian from the lowermost Permian of Germany and Czech Republic with four valid species, including the type species S. haeuseri. It is one of the most completely preserved and most abundant Palaeozoic tetrapods. Sclerocephalus was once thought to be closely related to eryopoid temnospondyls, but it is now thought to be more closely related to archegosauroids. It is the only genus in the family Sclerocephalidae.

<i>Intasuchus</i> Extinct genus of amphibians

Intasuchus is an extinct genus of temnospondyl amphibian from the Middle Permian of Russia. It is known from a single species, Intasuchus silvicola, which was named in 1956. Intasuchus belongs to the family Intasuchidae and is probably its sole member, although other taxa such as Syndyodosuchus and Cheliderpeton have been assigned to the family in the past. Intasuchus most likely belongs to the group Archegosauroidea, Permian relatives of the large, mostly Mesozoic temnospondyl clade Stereospondyli.

<i>Konzhukovia</i> Genus of amphibians (fossil)

Konzhukovia is an amphibian genus that belongs to an extinct family Konzhukoviidae of temnospondyls, the largest clade of basal tetrapods including about 198 genera, 292 species, and more than half of which were alive during the early Mesozoic period. The animal was a predator that lived about 260 million years ago, and could get up to about three meters in length. Specifically, Konzukovia lived during the Permian, between 252 and 270 million years ago according to the type of rock the fossil was found in. There are three species within this genus, K. vetusta, K. tarda, and K. sangabrielensis, the first two originating from Russia while the latest originating from Southern Brazil. The discovery of this specimen in Southern Brazil provided more evidence to support the idea that during this animals existence, there was a “biological corridor” because of the supercontinent Pangea, allowing these species to be found so far apart from each other. Konzhukovia belongs to the family Archegosauridae, a family consisted of large temnospondyls that most likely compare to modern day crocodiles. Since the discovery of the latest species, K. sangabrielensis, Pacheco proposes that there must be the creation of a new family, Konzhokoviidae, a monophyletic group in a sister-group relationship with Stereospondlyi in order to accommodate the three species. Konzhukovia skulls usually exhibit typical rhinesuchid features including an overall parabolic shape, small orbits located more posteriorly, and the pterygoids do not reach the vomer. These animals were long-snouted amphibians that had clear adaptations made for fish catching, as well as exemplifying aquatic features.

<i>Benthosuchus</i> Extinct genus of amphibians

Benthosuchus is an extinct genus of temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Triassic of Russia. It was primarily aquatic, living in rivers and lakes. Multiple species are known, with the largest reaching about 2.5 meters in length.

<i>Bothriceps</i> Extinct genus of amphibians

Bothriceps is an extinct genus of stereospondyl temnospondyl. It is a member of the infraorder Trematosauria and is the most basal brachyopomorph known. It may be the only brachyopomorph that lies outside the superfamily Brachyopoidea, which includes the families Brachyopidae and Chigutisauridae. It shares several similarities to Keratobrachyops, another basal brachyopomorph, and may be closely related to or even synonymous with it.

<i>Lydekkerina</i> Extinct genus of temnospondyls from the Early Triassic

Lydekkerina is an extinct genus of stereospondyl temnospondyl. It is the type genus of the family Lydekkerinidae. Fossils have been collected from Early Triassic deposits in South Africa and Australia. The type species is L. huxleyi, first described in 1889. While most other stereospondyls were semiaquatic, Lydekkerina was exclusively terrestrial.

<i>Rhineceps</i> Extinct genus of temnospondyls

Rhineceps is an extinct genus of temnospondyl amphibian in the family Rhinesuchidae. Rhineceps was found in Northern Malawi in Southern Africa known only from its type species R. nyasaensis. Rhineceps was a late Permian semi-aquatic carnivore that lived in streams, rivers, lakes or lagoons. Rhineceps is an early divergent Stereopondyl within the family Rhinesuchidae, which only existed in the late Permian (Lopingian) and failed to survive the Permian-Triassic extinction unlike other stereospondyl families.

<i>Thoosuchus</i> Extinct genus of amphibians

Thoosuchus is an extinct genus of basal trematosauroid trematosaurian temnospondyl. Fossils have been found from Russia and date back to the Early Triassic. It is the type genus of the family Thoosuchidae, formerly called the subfamily Thoosuchinae and placed within Benthosuchidae. The benthosuchids were originally composed of the majority of basal trematosaurian forms regarded as the ancestors of the trematosaurids.

Parioxys is an extinct genus of temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Permian of Texas.

<i>Acanthostomatops</i> Extinct genus of amphibians

Acanthostomatops is an extinct genus of zatracheidid temnospondyl from the Lower Permian Döhlen Basin of Saxony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Branchiosauridae</span> Extinct family of temnospondyls

Branchiosauridae is an extinct family of small amphibamiform temnospondyls with external gills and an overall juvenile appearance. The family has been characterized by hundreds of well-preserved specimens from the Permo-Carboniferous of Middle Europe. Specimens represent well defined ontogenetic stages and thus the taxon has been described to display paedomorphy (perennibranchiate). However, more recent work has revealed branchiosaurid taxa that display metamorphosing trajectories. The name Branchiosauridae refers to the retention of gills.

Uralosuchus is an extinct genus of temnospondyl amphibian from the Late Permian of Russia, belonging to the group Archegosauroidea. It is a member of the archegosauroidean subfamily Melosaurinae. Fossils have been found in Orenburg Oblast. Uralosuchus was named in 1993 with the description of the type species U. tverdochlebovae.

References

  1. Uliakhin, A. V.; Golubev, V. K. (2024). "Ancient Species of the Genus Dvinosaurus (Temnospondyli, Dvinosauria) from the Permian Sundyr Tetrapod Assemblage of Eastern Europe". Paleontological Journal. 58 (2): 204–225. doi:10.1134/S0031030123600336.
  2. "PBDB". paleobiodb.org. Retrieved 2020-03-02.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Sushkin, P.P. (1936). "Notes on the pre-Jurassic tetrapods from USSR. III. Dvinosaurus amalitzki, a perennibranchiate stegocephalian from the Upper Permian of North Dvina". Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleozoologicheskogo Instituta.
  4. Bystrow, A.P. (1938). "Dvinosaurus als Neotenische Form der Stegocephalen". Acta Zoologica. 19 (1–2): 209–295. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.1938.tb00688.x.
  5. Shishkin, M.A. (2018). "Comments on the Paper of B.P. Vjuschkov "Locality of Permian Terrestrial Vertebrates in the Vicinities of the Town of Vyazniki"". Paleontological Journal. 52 (2): 175–187. doi:10.1134/S0031030118020120. S2CID   89750532.
  6. Gubin, Y.M. (2004). "A New Dvinosaur (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) from the Upper Tatarian of the Middle Volga Region". Paleontological Journal. 38: 190–199.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sushkin, P.P. (1936). "Notes on the pre-Jurassic tetrapods from USSR. III. Dvinosaurus amalitzki, a perennibranchiate stegocephalian from the Upper Permian of North Dvina". Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleozoologicheskogo Instituta.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Boyarinova, Elena (2019). "On the lifestyle of the Late Permian Dvinosaurus (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) from the East European Platform". Kazan Golovkinsy Stratagraphic Meeting.
  9. Carroll, Robert L. (Robert Lynn), 1938- (2009). The rise of amphibians : 365 million years of evolution. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN   978-0-8018-9140-3. OCLC   231947315.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  10. Schoch, Rainer R.; Witzmann, Florian (2011). "Bystrow's Paradox – gills, fossils, and the fish-to-tetrapod transition". Acta Zoologica. 92 (3): 251–265. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00456.x. ISSN   1463-6395.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Efremov, I.A. (1932). "On the Permo-Triassic labyrinthodonts from the U.S.S.R.". Works of the Paleozoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 1: 57–68.
  12. 1 2 Gubin, Y.M. (2004). "A New Dvinosaur (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) from the Upper Tatarian of the Middle Volga Region". Paleontological Journal. 38: 190–199.
  13. 1 2 Shishkin, M.A. (1989). "The axial skeleton of early amphibians and the origin of resegmentation in tetrapod vertebrae". Progress in Zoology. 35: 180–195.
  14. Ulyakhin, A.V. (2018). "Morphology of Postdental Bones of the Lower Jaw in Late Perm Dvinosaurus (Amphibia: Temnospondyli ) as the Main Indicator of Special Differences". Fundamental and Applied Paleontology: 238–241.
  15. Sennikov, Andrey (2012). "Upper Permian vertebrate coprolites from Vyazniki and Gorokhovets, vyatkian regional stage, Russian platform". Paleontological Journal. 37 (12): 417–424. Bibcode:2013Palai..27..867O. doi:10.2110/palo.2012.p12-017r. S2CID   55553300.
  16. Sennikov, Andrey (2006). "Vyazniki biotic assemblage of the terminal Permian". Paleontological Journal. 40 (4): 475–481. doi:10.1134/S0031030106100078. S2CID   129507095.
  17. Gould, Stephen Jay (1970). "Dollo on Dollo's law: Irreversibility and the status of evolutionary laws". Journal of the History of Biology. 3 (2): 189–212. doi:10.1007/bf00137351. ISSN   0022-5010. PMID   11609651. S2CID   45642853.
  18. YATES, ADAM M.; WARREN, A. ANNE (2001). "The phylogeny of the 'higher' temnospondyls (Vertebrata: Choanata) and its implications for the monophyly and origins of the Stereospondyli". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 128 (1): 77–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb00650.x . ISSN   0024-4082.