Equality Act (United States)

Last updated

Equality Act
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleTo prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation, and for other purposes.
Announced inthe 118th United States Congress
Number of co-sponsors217
Legislative history

The Equality Act was a bill in the United States Congress, that, if passed, would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (including titles II, III, IV, VI, VII, and IX) to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, federally funded programs, credit, and jury service. [1] [2] The Supreme Court's June 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County protects gay and transgender people in matters of employment, but not in other respects. The Bostock ruling also covered the Altitude Express and Harris Funeral Homes cases.

Contents

The bill would also expand existing civil rights protections for people of color by prohibiting discrimination in more public accommodations, such as exhibitions, goods and services, and transportation.

Much like the Bostock v. Clayton County decision, the Equality Act broadly defines sex discrimination to include sexual orientation and gender identity, adding "pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition of an individual, as well as because of sex-based stereotypes". The intended purpose of the act is to legally protect individuals from discrimination based on such. [1]

While various similar bills have been proposed since the 1970s, the modern version of the Equality Act was first proposed in the 114th United States Congress. During the 116th Congress, it passed the United States House of Representatives on May 17, 2019, in a bipartisan 236–173 vote. [3] [4] However, the United States Senate did not act upon the bill after receiving it; even if they had, then-President Donald Trump signaled that he would have vetoed it. [5] On February 18, 2021, the act was reintroduced in the 117th Congress. The House passed the act by a vote of 224 to 206 on February 25, 2021, with support from three Republicans. The bill then moved on to the Senate for consideration, but did not overcome a filibuster, and did not advance further. [6]

Purpose and content

The Equality Act would uniformly apply anti-LGBT discrimination law in the United States. State anti-discrimination laws as of May 2019: .mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} State law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in public employment, private employment, housing, and provision of goods and services State law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation (but not gender identity) in public employment, private employment, housing, and provision of goods and services State law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in public and private employment, but not in other areas such as housing and provision of goods and services State law does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Some states have similar executive orders, but their scope is limited to only cover public state employees against discrimination. LGBT anti-discrimination law in the United States by state.svg
The Equality Act would uniformly apply anti-LGBT discrimination law in the United States. State anti-discrimination laws as of May 2019:
  State law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in public employment, private employment, housing, and provision of goods and services
  State law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation (but not gender identity) in public employment, private employment, housing, and provision of goods and services
  State law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in public and private employment, but not in other areas such as housing and provision of goods and services
  State law does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Some states have similar executive orders, but their scope is limited to only cover public state employees against discrimination.

As of 2020, 29 states had not outlawed anti-LGBT discrimination, with members of the LGBT community being given little protection at a national level and two-thirds of LGBT Americans in the United States reported facing or having experienced discrimination in their personal lives. [7] [8] The Equality Act seeks to legally protect individuals from such discrimination, applying existing state anti-LGBT discrimination laws nationwide. [2]

The Equality Act seeks to incorporate protections against LGBT discrimination into the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, it prohibits discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex status in a wide variety of areas including public accommodations and facilities, education, federally funded programs, employment, housing, credit, and jury service. [1] [2]

It also seeks to expand existing civil rights protections for people of color, [9] women, [10] and other minority groups by updating the definition of public accommodations to include places or establishments that provide: [1] [2]

According to the text of the act as introduced in the 117th Congress, discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity by governments violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, saying:

Discrimination by State and local governments on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing, and public accommodations, and in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. In many circumstances, such discrimination also violates other constitutional rights such as those of liberty and privacy under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [1]

History

Early history (1970s–1990s)

The original Equality Act was developed by U.S. Representatives Bella Abzug (D-NY) and Ed Koch (D-NY) in 1974. The Equality Act of 1974 (H.R. 14752 of the 93rd Congress) sought to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, and marital status in federally assisted programs, housing sales, rentals, financing, and brokerage services. The bill authorized civil actions by the Attorney General of the United States in cases of discrimination on account of sex, sexual orientation, or marital status in public facilities and public education. On June 27, 1974, H.R. 14752 was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, but did not proceed to a vote in the full United States House of Representatives. [11]

From 1994, the more narrow Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) was introduced, but faced opposition over whether transgender Americans would be protected. An expanded version of ENDA which included both sexual orientation and changed sex to gender identity in its protections passed the United States Senate in 2013, but did not advance in the House. [12]

Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia (2020)

On June 15, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination against gay and transgender people in employment. LGBTQ rights advocates welcomed the ruling and reaffirmed support for passage of the Equality Act, stating that the ruling only covered employment, and in many states LGBTQ people still lack non-discrimination protections in housing, public accommodations, public education, federal funding, credit, and jury service which would be covered under the Equality Act. [13] [14] [15] The ruling said that the Civil Rights Act protects "gay and transgender" people in matters of employment but left the terms undefined. [16] [17]

Public opinion

A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in May/June 2019 found that most Americans do not know that LGBT people lack federal protections. Only one-third of respondents knew that such protections do not exist on the basis of transgender identity, and only one-quarter knew that they do not exist on the basis of lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity. [18] [19]

A nationwide and state-by-state poll on the issue conducted throughout 2017 by the Public Religion Research Institute as part of its annual American Values Atlas survey said that 70% of Americans, including a majority in every state, supported laws that would protect LGBTQ people against discrimination, while 23% opposed such laws, and 8% had no opinion. [20] [21] [22] A 2020 PRRI poll said 83% of Americans would favor such anti-discrimination laws, and specifically regarding discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations. 16% of Americans oppose such laws. [23] [24] Support for such anti-discrimination laws was at 94% for Democrats, 85% for independents, and 68% for Republicans. [25] According to a 2021 PRRI survey, about 22% of Americans support religious exemptions for business owners pertaining to anti-discrimination law based on sexual orientation, while about 76% of Americans oppose such exemptions. [26]

A poll conducted by Quinnipiac University in April 2019 found that 92% of American voters believed that employers should not be allowed to fire someone based on their sexual orientation or sexual identity, while only 6% believed that employers should be allowed to do so. A wide consensus on this question was found among both Democratic and Republican voters, as well as Independents, although Democratic voters were slightly more likely to believe that this kind of discrimination should be illegal, with only 1% of them believing that employers should be allowed to fire someone based on their sexual orientation or sexual identity. [27]

Support and opposition

Support

The Equality Act is supported by more than 547 national, state and local organizations. [28] [29] [30] [31] These different organizations are related to human rights, social justice and religious groups. All of these organizations support the Equality Act.


Organizations related to human rights and social justice

American Civil Liberties Union, [32] Anti-Defamation League, [33] GLSEN, [34] Human Rights Campaign, [2] Human Rights Watch, [35] Southern Poverty Law Center, [36] Lambda Legal, [37] the Navajo Nation, [38] the National Organization for Women, [39] the NAACP, [40] and the AARP. [41]

National professional organizations

American Psychological Association, [42] American Medical Association, [43] American Counseling Association, American Federation of Teachers, [44] American Bar Association, [45] and the American Academy of Pediatrics, as well as the National PTA. [29]

American businesses

Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, eBay, IBM, Facebook, Airbnb, Twitter, Intel, Red Hat and Netflix. Other companies supporting the act include 3M, Kellogg's, Visa, Starbucks, Mastercard, Johnson & Johnson, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, [46] [47] and US Chamber of Commerce. [48]

Celebrities

Alexandra Billings, [49] Karamo Brown, [50] Gloria Calderón Kellett, [51] Charlie Carver, [52] Max Carver, [52] Nyle DiMarco, [53] Sally Field, [54] Marcia Gay Harden, [55] Dustin Lance Black, [56] Jamie Lee Curtis, [57] Jane Lynch, [58] Justina Machado, [59] Adam Rippon, [60] Taylor Swift, [61] [62] [63] Bella Thorne, [64] and Jesse Tyler Ferguson. [65]

Feminist and women's groups

National Organization for Women, 9to5: the National Association of Working Women, the Coalition of Labor Union Women, Feminist Majority, Girls, Inc.,Jewish Women International, The National Black Women's Reproductive Justice Agenda, NARAL, MANA, A National Latina Organization, MomsRising, National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum (NAPAWF), National Association for Female Executives, National Women's Health Network, National Women's Law Center, Planned Parenthood, Positive Women's Network-USA, and United State of Women. [29] The Women's Sports Foundation, the Women's National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA), Athlete Ally, along with Megan Rapinoe, Billie Jean King, Candace Parker and 176 current and former athletes in women's sports have spoken up for full LGBTQ inclusion in sports, including of transgender athletes. [66] [67]

Religious groups

Episcopal Church, The United Methodist Church, [68] The United Church of Christ, [69] the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, More Light Presbyterians, African American Ministers in Action, The Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists, [29] The Union for Reform Judaism, [68] United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, Muslims for Progressive Values, the Hindu American Foundation, [29] and the Unitarian Universalist Association. [68]

Other endorsements

Calling for the bill's passage in 2016, civil rights icon John Lewis said, "This legislation is what justice requires. This legislation is what justice demands. And like the Supreme Court's recent decision, it is long overdue ... We are a society committed to equal justice under the law. ... We have fought too hard and too long against discrimination based on race and color not to stand up against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity." [70]

Opposition

Numerous political pundits and politicians have stated their opposition to the Equality Act at various times. Notable among these was Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), which caused a brief political feud between her and Rep. Marie Newman (D-IL). [71] [72] [73] Greene had said in a speech that the proposed act "destroys God's creation, ... completely annihilates women's rights and religious freedoms", [74] [75] and "puts trans rights above women's rights". [76]

Fox News anchor, Tucker Carlson, called the Equality Act a "terrifying agenda that eliminates women". Candace Owens appeared on Carlson's Fox News talk show in the same segment and said about the Equality Act that Democrats "don't know what equality is". [77]

Some single-issue women's groups have opposed the provision of the bill which defines sex to include gender identity. Some groups say that the provision endangers the "sex-based rights" of women and girls, including women's sports and women-only spaces such as locker rooms, prisons, and shelters. [78] [79] Among these groups has been the Women's Human Rights Campaign USA (WHRC USA), [80] the Women's Liberation Front (WoLF), [81] Feminists in Struggle (FiST), [82] Standing for Women, [83] and Save Women's Sports. [84] They oppose the bill unless it is amended to protect sex and not gender identity. Both WHRC USA and FIST have proposed amendments to the act [82] [85] and not recognize gender identity. Some organization that oppose the Equality Act are funded by fundamentalist anti-LGBT hate groups(as designated by the SPLC) such as the Alliance Defending Freedom. The organization has shifted their messaging to sound more secular and feminist, although this is disputed by its supporters having anti-LGBT views. [86] [87] [88]

Georgia State University criminology professor Callie H. Burt published a paper in the June 2020 issue of Feminist Criminology in which she examined the potential effects of the Equality Act on women's rights. While saying the act is "laudable in its aims", Burt lamented the lack of scrutiny and discussion by Democratic representatives in Congress into the real consequences the act's "imprecise language" would bring to women: "The result is the erosion of females' provisions, which include sex-separated spaces (e.g., prisons, locker rooms, shelters), opportunities and competitions (e.g., awards, scholarships, sports), and events (e.g., meetings, groups, festivals)". She also said, "I submit that the bill, in current form, fails to strike a balance between the rights, needs, and interests of two marginalized (and overlapping) groups—trans people and females—and instead prioritizes the demands of trans people over the hard-won rights of female people." [79]

The Economist, a British newspaper, stated in October 2020 that the original draft of the act endangers the rights of women in areas such as sports, where they would be at a physical disadvantage having to compete against trans women. When it comes to biological-sex segregated spaces, such as public bathrooms and prisons, the newspaper states that "parts of the bill appear to put the needs of transgender people above those of women. This is because the act redefines 'sex' in Title IX and other amendments of the Civil Rights Act to include 'gender identity; rather than making transgenderism a protected category of its own. Its definition of 'gender identity' is fuzzy and appears to downplay the reality of sex." [89]

Law professor Douglas Laycock told NPR that the law is "less necessary" now, after the Bostock decision, and that the bill "protects the rights of one side, but attempts to destroy the rights of the other side." [90]

Some religious leaders oppose the bill for various reasons, saying for example that it would infringe on religious liberty. [91] [92]

On March 20, 2019, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops sent a letter addressed to the United States Senate that opposed the Equality Act on the grounds of freedom of expression and freedom of religion, among other concerns. [93]

On May 7, 2019, a coalition of Christian organizations sent a letter to the House of Representatives stating their opposition to the Equality Act. In the letter, the groups expressed that the act "undermines religious freedom, and threatens charitable nonprofits and the people they serve, regulates free speech, hinders quality health care, and endangers the privacy and safety of women and girls." In addition to four committee chairs of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, signers included leaders from the Christian Legal Society, the Center for Law and Religious Freedom, the Center for Public Justice, the National Association of Evangelicals, the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, the Lutheran Center for Religious Liberty (affiliated with the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod), the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, and the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance. [94]

Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, said that "The Equality Act is the most comprehensive assault on religious liberty, the right to life, and privacy rights ever packaged into one bill." Donohue also stated his concern that "Catholic hospitals would no longer be allowed to govern as Catholic facilities, threatening healthcare for everyone, especially the poor." [95]

On May 16, 2019, Sister Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic Health Association sent a letter to lawmakers in the House expressing concern that the act, as written, would roll back religious liberty protections. "Federal law has long recognized that certain services can present conflict for some faith-based health care providers with religious or moral objections to providing those services, and protected them from having to do so. We are concerned that the Equality Act omits and could erode or reduce those protections." The legislation, she said, "lacks conscience protection language and precludes application of RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act)." [96]

The American Family Association published an article in April 2019 opposing the act. [97]

On May 13, 2019, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints released a statement that read in part, "The Equality Act now before Congress is not balanced and does not meet the standard of fairness for all. While providing extremely broad protections for LGBT rights, the Equality Act provides no protections for religious freedom". [92] [98] In 2021, the LDS Church endorsed a competing bill, the Fairness for All Act. The competing bill would add faith-based exemptions to anti-discrimination law. Other than the LDS Church, its supporters have included the Seventh-day Adventist Church and the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities. [99]

The Heritage Foundation has argued that the act would adversely affect five groups of people (employers and workers; medical professionals; parents and children; non-profit organizations and their volunteers; and women), and they describe specific harms the Foundation believes each group would experience from the act's passage. [100]

Transgender rights and the Equality Act

Much of the concern surrounding the Equality Act stems from the protections that would be guaranteed for transgender individuals in sports and also in access to sex-segregated spaces. It is argued that these protections would endanger women in sex-segregated spaces such as bathrooms and prisons. However, the National Taskforce to End Sexual and Domestic Violence and over 250 anti-sexual assault organizations have condemned opponents' attempts to portray transgender people as sexual predators and contends it is untrue that protections for transgender people endanger women's safety and privacy. [101]   The Taskforce's joint letter was signed by over 250 survivor organizations in full support of full and equal access for the transgender community, including in restrooms and locker rooms. [102] The letter notes the [21] states and 200+ municipalities that have protected transgender people's access to facilities have not seen an increase in sexual violence and public safety incidents due to nondiscrimination laws. The letter also notes that anti-transgender initiatives put transgender people at further risk of assault. [103]

Religious organizations that have expressed their support for the act claim that this act would protect transgender children and people; however, this has been overshadowed by the strong opposition by other religious groups and organizations.

Religious organizations and registered charities that have given public support to the act include Advocates for Youth, and various Catholic leaders and lobbying organizations such as Father James Martin S.J., [104] Network, [105] and DignityUSA. [106] Catholic theologian and nun Joan Chittister released a statement saying that the Equality Act "must be passed, must be extended, and must be lived if religion itself is to be true". [107] The Interfaith Alliance endorsed the Equality Act as part of "Faith for Equality", a coalition which provided a letter signed by over 17,000 religious Americans to Senator Chris Coons in support of the act. [108] [109]

Edith Guffey, a UCC minister and mother of a transgender, non-binary child testified to Congress in support of the Equality Act, saying "We should all be able to agree on this one thing, the law should treat all our children, God's children, equally. All of our children deserve to be treated with and respect. Every single one of us would go to the mat for our children. None of us wants them to be turned away or discriminated against for any reason." [110] [111]

At a 2021 Senate hearing for the Equality Act, 16-year-old Stella Keating became the first transgender teenager to testify before Congress saying, "Right now, I could be denied medical care or be evicted for simply being transgender in many states. ... What if I'm offered a dream job in a state where I can be discriminated against? Even if my employer is supportive, I still have to live somewhere. Eat in restaurants. Have a doctor", she added. "This is the United States of America. The country that I love. Every young person ... regardless of who they are or who they love, should be able to be excited about their future." [112]

Presidents' stances

Barack Obama

President Obama and Vice President Biden voiced support for the Equality Act when it was first introduced in the 114th United States Congress. [113] [114]

Donald Trump

The Trump Administration opposed the Equality Act. In August 2019, the White House issued a statement, "The Trump Administration absolutely opposes discrimination of any kind and supports the equal treatment of all; however, the House-passed bill in its current form is filled with poison pills that threaten to undermine parental and conscience rights." [115]

Joe Biden

President Biden and Vice President Harris are vocal defenders of the Equality Act, issuing a statement from the White House, "I applaud Congressman David Cicilline and the entire Congressional Equality Caucus for introducing the Equality Act in the House of Representatives yesterday, and I urge Congress to swiftly pass this historic legislation. Every person should be treated with dignity and respect, and this bill represents a critical step toward ensuring that America lives up to our foundational values of equality and freedom for all." [116] [23]

In March 2022 President Biden called for the passage of the Equality Act during the State Of The Union. [117] On the March 2022 Trans Day of Visibility, the Biden administration announced that it was fighting for the passage of the Equality Act to advance the civil rights of trans Americans. [118]

Legislative activity

114th Congress

On July 23, 2015, Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) introduced H.R. 3185, the Equality Act of 2015, in the United States House of Representatives. [119] The bill was supported by President Barack Obama. [113] In January 2016, Rep. Bob Dold (R-IL) became the first Republican Representative to co-sponsor the bill. [120] Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) became the second Republican to co-sponsor the bill in September 2016. Jenniffer González (R-PR) also co-sponsored the bill. [121]

On July 23, 2015, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced S. 1858, the Equality Act of 2015, in the United States Senate. In January 2016, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) became the first and only Republican Senator to co-sponsor the bill. All Democrats and Independents cosponsored the bill with the exception of Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Jon Tester (D-MT).

115th Congress

On May 2, 2017, Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) introduced H.R. 2282, the Equality Act of 2017, in the United States House of Representatives. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) was the only Republican to co-sponsor the bill from the outset, with Rep. Scott Taylor (R-VA) becoming the second Republican to co-sponsor the bill on May 26, 2017.

On May 2, 2017, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced S. 1006, the Equality Act of 2017, in the United States Senate. All Democrats and Independents cosponsored the bill with the exceptions of Joe Donnelly (D-IN) and Joe Manchin (D-WV).

116th Congress

On March 13, 2019, Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) introduced H.R. 5, the Equality Act of 2019, in the United States House of Representatives. The bill is sponsored by 237 Democrats and 3 Republicans. On May 1, 2019, the bill passed the House Judiciary Committee by a vote of 22–10, with all Democratic members of the committee voting in favor and all Republican members against. [122] A vote by the full House was held on May 17, 2019; the vote carried with 236 votes for and 173 against. Eight Republicans voted in favor of the bill and no Democrats opposed it. [3] [123]

On March 13, 2019, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced S. 788, the Equality Act of 2019, in the United States Senate. The bill was sponsored by 43 Democrats, 2 Independents, and 1 Republican.

117th Congress

On February 18, 2021, H.R. 5 was reintroduced to the House of Representatives. It was passed by the House for the second time on February 25, 2021, and now moves on to the Senate. [124] Notable speeches were heard by, among others, Nancy Pelosi, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Marie Newman. [125] [23] [126] Among Republican Representatives, only Tom Reed, John Katko, and Brian Fitzpatrick voted in favor; fewer than in the previous Congress. Mario Díaz-Balart and Elise Stefanik previously voted in favor but now voted against.

On February 23, 2021, a companion bill, S. 393, was introduced in the Senate. It was referred to the Judiciary Committee, where a hearing was held on March 17, 2021. [127] It had, as of February 26, 2021, 48 co-sponsors. [128] However, it was unable to gain enough support among Republicans to meet the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster, and did not advance further. [6]

Legislative history

As of January 31, 2024:

CongressShort titleBill number(s)Date introducedSponsor(s)# of cosponsorsLatest status
114th Congress Equality Act of 2015 H.R. 3185 July 23, 2015 David Cicilline
(D–RI)		178Died in committee
S. 1858 July 23, 2015 Jeff Merkley
(D–OR)		42Died in committee
115th Congress Equality Act of 2017 H.R. 2282 May 2, 2017 David Cicilline
(D–RI)		198Died in committee
S. 1006 May 2, 2017 Jeff Merkley
(D–OR)		47Died in committee
116th Congress Equality Act of 2019 H.R. 5 March 13, 2019 David Cicilline
(D–RI)		240Passed the House (236–173) [3]
S. 788 March 13, 2019 Jeff Merkley
(D–OR)		46Died in committee
117th Congress Equality Act of 2021 H.R. 5 February 18, 2021 David Cicilline
(D–RI)		224Passed the House (224–206) [124]
S. 393 February 23, 2021 Jeff Merkley
(D–OR)		48Died in committee
118th Congress Equality Act of 2023 H.R. 15 June 21, 2023 Mark Takano

(D-CA)

217Referred to committees of Jurisdiction
S.5 June 21, 2023 Jeff Merkley
(D–OR)		50Referred to committees of Jurisdiction

See also

Related Research Articles

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is legislation proposed in the United States Congress that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment on the basis of sexual orientation or, depending on the version of the bill, gender identity, by employers with at least 15 employees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Center for Transgender Equality</span> U.S. nonprofit organization

The National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) is a nonprofit social equality organization founded in 2003 by transgender activist Mara Keisling in Washington, D.C. The organization works primarily in the areas of policy advocacy and media activism with the aim of advancing the equality of transgender people in the United States. Among other transgender-related issue areas, NCTE focuses on discrimination in employment, access to public accommodations, fair housing, identity documents, hate crimes and violence, criminal justice reform, federal research surveys and the Census, and health care access.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in the United States</span>

The rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the United States are among the most advanced in the world, with public opinion and jurisprudence changing significantly since the late 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in the Philippines</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) individuals in the Republic of the Philippines have faced many difficulties in their homeland, such as prejudice, violence, abuse, assault, harassment and other forms of anti-LGBT rhetoric. Many LGBT Filipinos are met with mixed attitudes and reactions by their families, friends and others in their communities, as well as professionals, educators, their national public officials, politicians, attorneys and others working for the government and the rest of the general population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Wyoming</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Wyoming may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Wyoming since 1977, and same-sex marriage was legalized in the state in October 2014. Wyoming statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, the cities of Jackson, Casper, and Laramie have enacted ordinances outlawing discrimination in housing and public accommodations that cover sexual orientation and gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Michigan</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Michigan enjoy the same rights as non-LGBTQ people. Michigan in June 2024 was ranked "the most welcoming U.S. state for LGBT individuals". Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Michigan under the U.S. Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy law. Same-sex marriage was legalised in accordance with 2015's Obergefell v. Hodges decision. Discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity is unlawful since July 2022, was re-affirmed by the Michigan Supreme Court - under and by a 1976 statewide law, that explicitly bans discrimination "on the basis of sex". The Michigan Civil Rights Commission have also ensured that members of the LGBT community are not discriminated against and are protected in the eyes of the law since 2018 and also legally upheld by the Michigan Supreme Court in 2022. In March 2023, a bill passed the Michigan Legislature by a majority vote - to formally codify both "sexual orientation and gender identity" anti-discrimination protections embedded within Michigan legislation. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed the bill on March 16, 2023. In 2024, Michigan repealed “the last ban on commercial surrogacy within the US” - for individuals and couples and reformed the parentage laws, that acknowledges same sex couples and their families with children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Delaware</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Delaware enjoy the same legal protections as non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Delaware since January 1, 1973. On January 1, 2012, civil unions became available to same-sex couples, granting them the "rights, benefits, protections, and responsibilities" of married persons. Delaware legalized same-sex marriage on July 1, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in New Jersey</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of New Jersey have the same legal rights as non-LGBTQ people. LGBT individuals in New Jersey enjoy strong protections from discrimination, and have had the same marriage rights as heterosexual people since October 21, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Respect for Marriage Act</span> 2022 U.S. federal law

The Respect for Marriage Act is a landmark United States federal law passed by the 117th United States Congress in 2022 and signed into law by President Joe Biden. It repeals the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), requires the U.S. federal government and all U.S. states and territories to recognize the validity of same-sex and interracial civil marriages in the United States, and protects religious liberty. Its first version in 2009 was supported by former Republican U.S. Representative Bob Barr, the original sponsor of DOMA, and former President Bill Clinton, who signed DOMA in 1996. Iterations of the proposal were put forth in the 111th, 112th, 113th, 114th, and 117th Congresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in North Dakota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of North Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in North Dakota, and same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples; same-sex marriage has been legal since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in South Dakota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of South Dakota may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Dakota, and same-sex marriages have been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Kentucky</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Kentucky still face some legal challenges not experienced by other people. Same-sex sexual activity in Kentucky has been legally permitted since 1992, although the state legislature has not repealed its sodomy statute for same-sex couples. Same-sex marriage is legal in Kentucky under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. The decision, which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages and all other same-sex marriage bans elsewhere in the country, was handed down on June 26, 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Idaho</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Idaho face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Idaho, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since October 2014. State statutes do not address discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. A number of cities and counties provide further protections, namely in housing and public accommodations. A 2019 Public Religion Research Institute opinion poll showed that 71% of Idahoans supported anti-discrimination legislation protecting LGBTQ people, and a 2016 survey by the same pollster found majority support for same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Alaska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in the U.S. state of Alaska have evolved significantly over the years. Since 1980, same-sex sexual conduct has been allowed, and same-sex couples can marry since October 2014. The state offers few legal protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, leaving LGBTQ people vulnerable to discrimination in housing and public accommodations; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. In addition, four Alaskan cities, Anchorage, Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan, representing about 46% of the state population, have passed discrimination protections for housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Mississippi</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in the U.S. state of Mississippi face legal challenges and discrimination not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents. LGBT rights in Mississippi are limited in comparison to other states. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Mississippi as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas. Same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. State statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal under federal law. The state capital Jackson and a number of other cities provide protections in housing and public accommodations as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT employment discrimination in the United States</span>

LGBT employment discrimination in the United States is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is encompassed by the law's prohibition of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020), employment protections for LGBT people were patchwork; several states and localities explicitly prohibit harassment and bias in employment decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public employees. Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interpreted Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC determined that transgender employees were protected under Title VII in 2012, and extended the protection to encompass sexual orientation in 2015.

Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.

The social policy of the Joe Biden administration is intended to improve racial equity, increase access to safe and legal abortions, tighten restrictions on gun sales, among other aims. A number of policies aim to reverse the former policies of President Donald Trump, including the "Muslim" travel ban and loosened anti-discriminatory policies relating to LGBT people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive Order 13988</span> Executive order issued by U.S. President Joe Biden on sex discrimination

Executive Order 13988, officially titled Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation, is the fourth executive order signed by U.S. President Joe Biden on January 20, 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fairness West Virginia</span> West Virginian LGBT civil rights organization

Fairness West Virginia is the statewide lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization for the U.S. state of West Virginia. Founded in 2009 by Stephen Skinner, the organization is currently headed by Andrew Schneider and is headquartered in downtown Charleston.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Cicilline, David N. (March 2, 2021). "Text - H.R.5 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Equality Act". www.congress.gov. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "The Equality Act". Human Rights Campaign. Archived from the original on August 21, 2021. Retrieved November 16, 2018.
  3. 1 2 3 Killough, Ashley (May 17, 2019). "Houses passes Equality Act to increase protections for sexual orientation and gender identity". CNN.
  4. ↑ "Equality Act, H.R. 5, 116th Congress (2019)". www.congress.gov. May 20, 2019. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  5. ↑ "Equality Act, H.R. 5, 116th Congress (2019), as received by the U.S. Senate on May 20, 2019, read twice, and referred to the S. Comm. on the Judiciary" (PDF). www.congress.gov. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  6. 1 2 Sherman, Amy (December 12, 2022). "Biden's promise to enact the Equality Act stalls". The Poynter Institute. Retrieved April 30, 2023.
  7. ↑ Johnson, Chris (March 13, 2019). "Equality Act returns — with House Democrats in majority". Washington Blade . Retrieved May 14, 2019.
  8. ↑ Steinmetz, Katy (March 28, 2019). "Why Federal Laws Don't Explicitly Ban Discrimination Against LGBT Americans". Time . Retrieved May 14, 2019.
  9. ↑ "What Does The Equality Act Mean for People of Color?" (PDF). assets2.hrc.org. Retrieved February 26, 2021.
  10. ↑ "What Does The Equality Act Mean for Women?" (PDF). assets2.hrc.org. Retrieved February 26, 2021.
  11. ↑ "Congress – Equality Act". United States Congress. 2017.
  12. ↑ Steinmetz, Katy (March 21, 2013). "Why Federal Laws Don't Explicitly Ban Discrimination Against LGBT Americans". Time. Retrieved April 9, 2019.
  13. ↑ "Human Rights Campaign: Supreme Court is On Right Side of History". HRC. June 15, 2020.
  14. ↑ Bobic, Igor (June 15, 2020). "Democrats Say Law Protecting LGBTQ Rights Still Needed Even After SCOTUS Victory". HuffPost.
  15. ↑ "Victory At Last! Supreme Court Confirms Workplace Protections for LGBTQ Employees". Lambda Legal.
  16. ↑ McGinley, Anne C. (December 2020). "Feminist Perspectives on Bostock v. Clayton County". Connecticut Law Review. 53: 14–15 – via Scholarly Commons.
  17. ↑ Marcus, Nancy C. (December 2, 2020). "Bostock v Clayton County and the problem of bisexual erasure". Northwestern University Law Review Online. 115: 223–239 – via Scholarly Commons.
  18. ↑ Caspani, Maria (June 12, 2019). "Americans' perception of LGBTQ rights under federal law largely incorrect: Reuters/Ipsos". Reuters . Retrieved June 14, 2019.
  19. ↑ "Ipsos Poll Conducted for Reuters: Stonewall Anniversary Poll" (PDF). June 6, 2019. Retrieved June 13, 2019.
  20. ↑ "Emerging Consensus on LGBT Issues: Findings From the 2017 American Values Atlas". Public Religion Research Institute . May 2018.
  21. ↑ "PRRI – American Values Atlas". Public Religion Research Institute .
  22. ↑ "70% Of Americans Support LGBT Anti-Discrimination Laws". NewNowNext.
  23. 1 2 3 Sonmez, Felicia; Schmidt, Samantha. "House votes to pass Equality Act, prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity". Washington Post . ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  24. ↑ "Support for gay marriage reaches all-time high, survey finds". NBC News. October 21, 2020. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  25. ↑ "Dueling Realities: Amid Multiple Crises, Trump and Biden Supporters See Different Priorities and Futures for the Nation". PRRI. October 19, 2020. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  26. ↑ "Is Religious Liberty a Shield or a Sword?". Public Religion Research Institute . February 10, 2021. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  27. ↑ "U.S. Voters Still Say 2-1 Trump Committed Crime, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; But Voters Oppose Impeachment 2-1". QU Poll. Quinnipiac University. May 2, 2019. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
  28. ↑ "334 Organizations Endorsing the Equality Act" (PDF). Human Rights Campaign.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 "543 organizations endorsing the Equality Act" (PDF). Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  30. ↑ Terrell, Kenneth. "AARP, AARP Foundation File Brief Supporting LGBT Adults". AARP . Retrieved July 4, 2019.
  31. ↑ "Issue Advisory: Equality Act Would Ensure Equal Treatment for LGBTQIA Persons and Women". now.org. July 30, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
  32. ↑ "ACLU Statement on Passage of the Equality Act in the House of Representatives". American Civil Liberties Union . Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  33. ↑ "Now is the Time to Pass the Equality Act". Anti-Defamation League. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  34. ↑ "GLSEN Statement on the Introduction of the Equality Act". GLSEN. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  35. ↑ "The United States Still Needs the Equality Act". Human Rights Watch. February 2, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  36. ↑ "Rise up against hate!". EveryAction. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  37. ↑ "Lambda Legal Applauds Passage of Equality Act by U.S. House of Representatives". Lambda Legal. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  38. ↑ "Council Votes to Support US Senate Bill 788 "Equality Act"" (PDF). Navajo Nation Council.
  39. ↑ "Pass The Equality Act NOW – National Organization for Women". now.org. February 23, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  40. ↑ "NAACP | U.S. House Passes the NAACP-Supported Equality Act". NAACP. May 21, 2019. Archived from the original on April 21, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  41. ↑ "AARP Backs Federal Efforts to Better Lives of LGBT Older Americans". MediaRoom. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  42. ↑ "APA Lauds Equality Act as Good for Business, Health and Families". American Psychological Association . Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  43. ↑ "Discrimination against LGBTQ+ Americans must end, doctors say". American Medical Association . March 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  44. ↑ "AFT's Weingarten on the Introduction of the Equality Act". American Federation of Teachers. July 23, 2015. Archived from the original on May 31, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  45. ↑ "The Equality Act: Replace a Tenuous Judicial Status Quo with a Permanent Legislative Solution to Ensure Workplace Opportunity for LGBTQ2+ People". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  46. ↑ "H.R. 5 and S. 788, 'Equality Act'". U.S. Chamber of Commerce. April 8, 2019. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  47. ↑ "Business Coalition for the Equality Act". Human Rights Campaign.
  48. ↑ "More than 500 Major U.S. Corporations Join Business Coalition for the Equality Act, Registering Unprecedented Support for Federal Non-Discrimination Protections for LGBTQ+ People". January 25, 2022.
  49. ↑ Alexandra Billings: When Have I Not Faced Discrimination? on YouTube
  50. ↑ Karamo Brown is an American for the Equality Act on YouTube
  51. ↑ Gloria Calderon Kellett on "Crazy" Patchwork of Protections for LGBTQ People on YouTube
  52. 1 2 Twins Max and Charlie Carver Support the Equality Act on YouTube
  53. ↑ Nyle DiMarco: No One Should Be Discriminated Against on YouTube
  54. ↑ Sally Field, Sam Greisman are Americans for the Equality Act on YouTube
  55. ↑ Marcia Gay Harden Supports the Equality Act on YouTube
  56. ↑ Dustin Lance Black Joins Americans For the Equality Act on YouTube
  57. ↑ Jamie Lee Curtis Joins HRC's Americans for the Equality Act Campaign on YouTube
  58. ↑ Jane Lynch Supports the Equality Act on YouTube
  59. ↑ Justina Machado Is an American for the Equality Act on YouTube
  60. ↑ Adam Rippon is an American for the Equality Act on YouTube
  61. ↑ McCluskey, Megan (June 1, 2019). "Taylor Swift Urges GOP Senator to Support LGBTQ Equality Act: 'Think About the Lives You Could Change'". Time.
  62. ↑ Swift, Taylor (June 1, 2019). "Taylor Swift on Instagram". Instagram. Archived from the original on December 24, 2021. Retrieved June 17, 2019. I've decided to kick off Pride Month by writing a letter to one of my senators to explain how strongly I feel that the Equality Act should be passed
  63. ↑ Taylor Swift Slams Trump In Support Of Equality Act on YouTube
  64. ↑ "Bella Thorne backs Taylor Swift's LGBTQ rights petition". Music-News.com. June 6, 2019.
  65. ↑ Jesse Tyler Ferguson and Justin Mikita join Americans for the Equality Act on YouTube
  66. ↑ "Athletes in women's sports" (PDF). American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved February 26, 2021.
  67. ↑ "Soule v. CIAC – Athletes in Women's Sports Amicus Brief".
  68. 1 2 3 Kuruvilla, Carol (May 14, 2019). "Interfaith Groups Rally In Support Of Equality Act For LGBTQ Rights". Huffington Post . Retrieved May 16, 2019.
  69. ↑ "Support the Equality Act". June 3, 2019. Archived from the original on June 3, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
  70. ↑ "Rep. John Lewis Speaks Out For The Equality Act". HuffPost. July 23, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  71. ↑ Ruthhart, Bill (February 25, 2021). "Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene attacks Illinois US Rep. Marie Newman's transgender daughter in feud over LGBTQ rights". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  72. ↑ Beavers, Olivia (February 25, 2021). "Scoop! Motion commotion!". Politico. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  73. ↑ Chandelis Duster (February 25, 2021). "Marjorie Taylor Greene posts anti-transgender sign across hall from lawmaker with transgender child". CNN . Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  74. ↑ "Antigay Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Equality Act Protects Pedophiles". The Advocate . February 24, 2021. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  75. ↑ Budryk, Zack (February 24, 2021). "Democrat posts trans flag across from Marjorie Taylor Greene's House office". The Hill . Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  76. ↑ Levin, Bess (February 25, 2021). "Marjorie Taylor Greene Wants People to Know She's Not Just Crazy, She's a Crazy Bigot". Vanity Fair . Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  77. ↑ Carlson, Tucker (March 2, 2021). "Does the Equality Act make women less equal?". Fox News . Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  78. ↑ "Who could object to the Equality Act?". The Economist. October 22, 2020. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  79. 1 2 Burt, Callie H. (June 2020). "Scrutinizing the US Equality Act 2019". Feminist Criminology. 15– via ResearchGate.
  80. ↑ "EFAA Talking Points – Women's Human Rights Campaign". womensdeclaration.com. Archived from the original on May 18, 2021. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  81. ↑ "House to Vote on The Equality Act: Take Action Now!". Women's Liberation Front. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  82. 1 2 "Actions to Take In Response to Biden's Executive Order and Imminent Introduction of the Equality Act". February 10, 2021. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  83. ↑ Kearns, Madeleine (January 30, 2019). "Bipartisan Women's Rights Groups Protest the Equality Act". National Review. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
  84. ↑ "Save Women's Sports – Equality Act, Hr5". Save Women's Sports. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  85. ↑ "USA: News – Women's Human Rights Campaign". womensdeclaration.com. Archived from the original on March 5, 2021. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  86. ↑ "Fake "Radical Feminist" group actually paid political front for anti-LGBT James Dobson organization". April 10, 2017.
  87. ↑ "Why is Alliance Defending Freedom a Hate Group?".
  88. ↑ Michaelson, Jay (September 4, 2016). "Radical Feminists and Conservative Christians Team up Against Transgender People". The Daily Beast.
  89. ↑ "Who could object to the Equality Act?". The Economist. October 22, 2020. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved February 24, 2021.
  90. ↑ Kurtzleben, Danielle (February 24, 2021). "House To Vote On Equality Act: Here's What The Law Would Do". NPR.org. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
  91. ↑ "Feminist & LGBTQ Activist Warns Equality Act 'Eradicates' Female Group, 'Grave Consequences for Women and Girls'". CBN News. May 17, 2019. Retrieved May 20, 2019.
  92. 1 2 "LDS Church comes out against Equality Act, saying LGBTQ rights bill doesn't ensure religious freedom". The Salt Lake Tribune . May 13, 2019.
  93. ↑ "USCCB 3-20-19 Letter to Congress on the Equality Act" (PDF).
  94. ↑ "ERLC joins coalitions in opposition to H.R. 5, the Equality Act". ERLC. April 6, 2019. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  95. ↑ Bill (May 14, 2019). "Equality Act is Madness On Stilts". Catholic League. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  96. ↑ "Dear Representative" (PDF). Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  97. ↑ Fischer, Bryan (April 4, 2019). "It's Not the Equality Act, It's the Homosexual Supremacy Act". American Family Association . Archived from the original on November 8, 2023. Retrieved May 17, 2019.
  98. ↑ "LDS Church comes out against Equality Act, saying LGBTQ rights bill doesn't ensure religious freedom". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved May 20, 2019.
  99. ↑ Dallas, Kelsey (February 26, 2021). "Latter-day Saint leaders join other faith groups sharing support for Stewart's LGBTQ rights bill". Deseret News. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  100. ↑ "The Equality Act". The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  101. ↑ "National Consensus Statement of Anti-Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Organizations in Support of Full and Equal Access for the Transgender Community". NTF. April 13, 2018. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  102. ↑ Pham, Larissa (April 24, 2018). "How Domestic Violence Shelters Are Fighting Back Against Transphobia". them. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  103. ↑ http://www.endsexualviolence.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/STATEMENT-OF-ANTI-SEXUAL-ASSAULT-AND-DOMESTIC-VIOLENCE-ORGANIZATIONS-IN-SUPPORT-OF-EQUAL-ACCESS-FOR-THE-TRANSGENDER-COMMUNITY.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  104. ↑ Martin, James (May 16, 2019). "Statement on Equality Act". Twitter . Retrieved May 16, 2019.
  105. ↑ O'Loughlin, Michael (May 16, 2019). "Some Catholic Advocates Support Equality Act". America . Retrieved May 16, 2019.
  106. ↑ "DignityUSA Letter to US Senators re Equality Act, S. 788 (2019):Catholics of Both Parties Support Equality". DignityUSA . May 10, 2019. Retrieved May 17, 2019.
  107. ↑ Massey, Sarah (March 13, 2019). "As Congress Introduces the Equality Act, Faith Leaders Speak Out in Support of LGBTQ Non-Discrimination Protections". Religious Institute. Archived from the original on May 17, 2019. Retrieved May 16, 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  108. ↑ "Interfaith Alliance Celebrates House Passage of Equality Act, Urges Action in the Senate". Interfaith Alliance . February 25, 2021. Retrieved March 17, 2021.
  109. ↑ "As Equality Act hearing begins, faith leaders meet with Sen. Coons to voice support". Religion News Service . March 17, 2021. Retrieved March 17, 2021.
  110. ↑ "National Leaders Rally in Support of the Equality Act". March 16, 2021.
  111. ↑ https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/The%20Equality%20Act%20Sen%20Judiciary%20Committee%20Testimony%20of%20Dr.%20Edith%20Guffey%20MSW.pdfhttps://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/The%20Equality%20Act%20Sen%20Judiciary%20Committee%20Testimony%20of%20Dr.%20Edith%20Guffey%20MSW.pdf [ dead link ]
  112. ↑ "Trans teen urges Senate to pass Equality Act, Republicans call it a threat to women". March 18, 2021.
  113. 1 2 "President Obama Endorses Equality Act". Out . November 10, 2015.
  114. ↑ "Yet Another Reason Joe Biden Is Everyone's Favorite LGBT Ally". www.advocate.com. August 2, 2016.
  115. ↑ Henderson, Cydney. "White House responds to Taylor Swift after she calls out President Trump at the VMAs". USA TODAY. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  116. ↑ Biden, Joseph R. (February 19, 2021). "Statement by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. on the Introduction of the Equality Act in Congress". The White House. Retrieved February 24, 2021.
  117. ↑ "Biden calls for passage of the Equality Act, denounces state legislative attacks on trans youth in State of the Union". MSN. Retrieved March 5, 2022.
  118. ↑ Biden, Joe (March 31, 2022). "FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Advances Equality and Visibility for Transgender Americans". The White House. Biden Administration. Retrieved April 2, 2022.
  119. ↑ "H.R.3185 – Equality Act". United States Congress. July 23, 2015.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  120. ↑ "Bob Dold of Illinois Is First Republican Cosponsor of Equality Act". The Advocate . January 15, 2016.
  121. ↑ Cioffi, Chris (May 17, 2019). "These 8 Republicans voted for the Equality Act". Roll Call . FiscalNote . Retrieved August 19, 2019.
  122. ↑ "House Judiciary Committee passes Equality Act". Washington Blade. May 2019.
  123. ↑ "Final vote results for roll call 217" . Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  124. 1 2 "Equality Act: House votes to expand legal safeguards for LGBTQ people". KTLA. February 25, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2021.
  125. ↑ "House votes to pass Equality Act". USA Today. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  126. ↑ "Capehart condemns Marjorie Taylor Greene's transphobic speech against Equality Act". MSNBC.com. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  127. ↑ "H.R.5 – Equality Act" . Retrieved April 30, 2023.
  128. ↑ Merkley, Jeff (February 23, 2021). "S. 393–117th Congress (2021-2022): Equality Act". www.congress.gov. Retrieved April 26, 2021.

Attribution:

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.