Eternalism (philosophy of time)

Last updated
Illustration of the concept of eternalism, showing a man walking his dog. Time progresses through the series of snapshots from the bottom of the page to the top. In a common sense view of time, each of those four instants would exist one after another. According to eternalism, those four instants all equally exist. Illustration of block universe.svg
Illustration of the concept of eternalism, showing a man walking his dog. Time progresses through the series of snapshots from the bottom of the page to the top. In a common sense view of time, each of those four instants would exist one after another. According to eternalism, those four instants all equally exist.

In the philosophy of space and time, eternalism [1] is an approach to the ontological nature of time, which takes the view that all existence in time is equally real, as opposed to presentism or the growing block universe theory of time, in which at least the future is not the same as any other time. [2] Some forms of eternalism give time a similar ontology to that of space, as a dimension, with different times being as real as different places, and future events are "already there" in the same sense other places are already there, and that there is no objective flow of time. [3]

Contents

It is sometimes referred to as the "block time" or "block universe" theory due to its description of space-time as an unchanging four-dimensional "block", as opposed to the view of the world as a three-dimensional space modulated by the passage of time.

The present

In classical philosophy, time is divided into three distinct regions: the "past", the "present", and the "future". Using that representational model, the past is generally seen as being immutably fixed, and the future as at least partly undefined. As time passes, the moment that was once the present becomes part of the past, and part of the future, in turn, becomes the new present. In this way time is said to pass, with a distinct present moment moving forward into the future and leaving the past behind. One view of this type, presentism, argues that only the present exists. The present does not travel forward through an environment of time, moving from a real point in the past and toward a real point in the future. Instead, it merely changes. The past and future do not exist and are only concepts used to describe the real, isolated, and changing present. This conventional model presents a number of difficult philosophical problems and may be difficult to reconcile with currently accepted scientific theories such as the theory of relativity. [4]

The bar and ring paradox is an example of the relativity of simultaneity. Both ends of the bar pass through the ring simultaneously in the rest frame of the ring (left), but the ends of the bar pass one after the other in the rest frame of the bar (right). BarAndRing.svg
The bar and ring paradox is an example of the relativity of simultaneity. Both ends of the bar pass through the ring simultaneously in the rest frame of the ring (left), but the ends of the bar pass one after the other in the rest frame of the bar (right).

It can be argued that special relativity eliminates the concept of absolute simultaneity and a universal present: according to the relativity of simultaneity, observers in different frames of reference can have different measurements of whether a given pair of events happened at the same time or at different times, with there being no physical basis for preferring one frame's judgments over those of another. However, there are events that may be non-simultaneous in all frames of reference: when one event is within the light cone of another—its causal past or causal future—then observers in all frames of reference show that one event preceded the other. The causal past and causal future are consistent within all frames of reference, but any other time is "elsewhere", and within it there is no present, past, or future. There is no physical basis for a set of events that represents the present. [5]

Many philosophers have argued that relativity implies eternalism. [6] Philosopher of science Dean Rickles says that, "the consensus among philosophers seems to be that special and general relativity are incompatible with presentism." [7] Christian Wüthrich argues that supporters of presentism can salvage absolute simultaneity only if they reject either empiricism or relativity. [8] Dean Zimmerman and others argue for a single privileged frame whose judgments about length, time, and simultaneity are the true ones, even if there is no empirical way to distinguish this frame. [9] [10]

The flow of time

Antiquity

Arguments for and against an independent flow of time have been raised since antiquity, represented by fatalism, reductionism, and Platonism: Classical fatalism argues that every proposition about the future exists, and it is either true or false, hence there is a set of every true proposition about the future, which means these propositions describe the future exactly as it is, and this future is true and unavoidable. Fatalism is challenged by positing that there are propositions that are neither true nor false, for example they may be indeterminate. Reductionism questions whether time can exist independently of the relation between events, and Platonism argues that time is absolute, and it exists independently of the events that occupy it. [4]

Earlier, pre-Socratic Greek philosopher Parmenides of Elea had posited that existence is timeless and change is impossible (an idea popularized by his disciple Zeno of Elea and his paradoxes about motion).

Middle ages

The philosopher Katherin A. Rogers argued that Anselm of Canterbury took an eternalist view of time, [11] although the philosopher Brian Leftow argued against this interpretation, [12] suggesting that Anselm instead advocated a type of presentism. Rogers responded to this paper, defending her original interpretation. [13] Rogers also discusses this issue in her book Anselm on Freedom, using the term "four-dimensionalism" rather than "eternalism" for the view that "the present moment is not ontologically privileged", and commenting that "Boethius and Augustine do sometimes sound rather four-dimensionalist, but Anselm is apparently the first consistently and explicitly to embrace the position." [14] Taneli Kukkonen argues in the Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy that "what Augustine's and Anselm's mix of eternalist and presentist, tenseless and tensed language tells is that medieval philosophers saw no need to choose sides" the way modern philosophers do. [15]

Augustine of Hippo wrote that God is outside of time—that time exists only within the created universe. Thomas Aquinas took the same view, and many theologians agree. On this view, God would perceive something like a block universe, while time might appear differently to the finite beings contained within it. [16]

Modern period

One of the most famous arguments about the nature of time in modern philosophy is presented in The Unreality of Time by J. M. E. McTaggart. [17] It argues that time is an illusion. McTaggart argued that the description of events as existing in absolute time is self-contradictory, because the events have to have properties about being in the past and in the future, which are incompatible with each other. McTaggart viewed this as a contradiction in the concept of time itself, and concluded that reality is non-temporal. He called this concept the B-theory of time. [4]

Dirck Vorenkamp, a professor of religious studies, argued in his paper "B-Series Temporal Order in Dogen's Theory of Time" [18] that the Zen Buddhist teacher Dōgen presented views on time that contained all the main elements of McTaggart's B-series view of time (which denies any objective present), although he noted that some of Dōgen's reasoning also contained A-Series notions, which Vorenkamp argued may indicate some inconsistency in Dōgen's thinking.

Eternalism also encapsulates the theory of world lines, and the concept of linear reality that is - the individual perception of linear time. [19]

Quantum physics

Some philosophers appeal to a specific theory that is "timeless" in a more radical sense than the rest of physics, the theory of quantum gravity. This theory is used, for instance, in Julian Barbour's theory of timelessness. [20] On the other hand, George Ellis argues that time is absent in cosmological theories because of the details they leave out. [21]

Recently, Hrvoje Nikolić has argued that a block time model solves the black hole information paradox. [22]

Objections

Philosophers such as John Lucas argue that "The Block universe gives a deeply inadequate view of time. It fails to account for the passage of time, the pre-eminence of the present, the directedness of time and the difference between the future and the past." [23] Similarly, Karl Popper argued in his discussion with Albert Einstein against determinism and eternalism from a common-sense standpoint. [24]

A flow-of-time theory with a strictly deterministic future, which nonetheless does not exist in the same sense as the present, would not satisfy common-sense intuitions about time. Some have argued that common-sense flow-of-time theories can be compatible with eternalism, for example John G. Cramer’s transactional interpretation. Kastner (2010) "proposed that in order to preserve the elegance and economy of the interpretation, it may be necessary to consider offer and confirmation waves as propagating in a “higher space” of possibilities. [25]

In Time Reborn , Lee Smolin argues that time is physically fundamental, in contrast to Einstein's view that time is an illusion. Smolin hypothesizes that the laws of physics are not fixed, but rather evolve over time via a form of cosmological natural selection. [26] [27] In The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time , co-authored with philosopher Roberto Mangabeira Unger, Smolin goes into more detail on his views on the physical passage of time. In contrast to the orthodox block universe view, Smolin argues that what instead exists is a "thick present" [28] [29] in which two events in the present can be causally related to each other. Marina Cortês and Lee Smolin also argue that certain classes of discrete dynamical systems demonstrate time asymmetry and irreversibility, which is inconsistent with the block universe interpretation of time. [30]

Avshalom Elitzur vehemently rejects the block universe interpretation of time. At the Time in Cosmology conference, held at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in 2016, Elitzur said: "I’m sick and tired of this block universe, ... I don’t think that next Thursday has the same footing as this Thursday. The future does not exist. It does not! Ontologically, it’s not there." [31] Elitzur and Shahar Dolev argue that quantum mechanical experiments such as the Quantum Liar [32] and the evaporation of black holes [33] challenge the mainstream block universe model, and support the existence of an objective passage of time. Elitzur and Dolev believe that an objective passage of time and relativity can be reconciled, and that it would resolve many of the issues with the block universe and the conflict between relativity and quantum mechanics. [34] Additionally, Elitzur and Dolev believe that certain quantum mechanical experiments provide evidence of apparently inconsistent histories, and that spacetime itself may therefore be subject to change affecting entire histories. [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum gravity</span> Description of gravity using discrete values

Quantum gravity (QG) is a field of theoretical physics that seeks to describe gravity according to the principles of quantum mechanics. It deals with environments in which neither gravitational nor quantum effects can be ignored, such as in the vicinity of black holes or similar compact astrophysical objects, such as neutron stars, as well as in the early stages of the universe moments after the Big Bang.

In physics, string theory is a theoretical framework in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings. String theory describes how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other. On distance scales larger than the string scale, a string looks just like an ordinary particle, with its mass, charge, and other properties determined by the vibrational state of the string. In string theory, one of the many vibrational states of the string corresponds to the graviton, a quantum mechanical particle that carries the gravitational force. Thus, string theory is a theory of quantum gravity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theory of everything</span> Hypothetical physical concept

A theory of everything (TOE), final theory, ultimate theory, unified field theory, or master theory is a hypothetical, singular, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical framework of physics that fully explains and links together all aspects of the universe. Finding a theory of everything is one of the major unsolved problems in physics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Time travel</span> Hypothetical travel into the past or future

Time travel is the hypothetical activity of traveling into the past or future. Time travel is a widely recognized concept in philosophy and fiction, particularly science fiction. In fiction, time travel is typically achieved through the use of a hypothetical device known as a time machine. The idea of a time machine was popularized by H. G. Wells's 1895 novel The Time Machine.

A wormhole is a hypothetical structure connecting disparate points in spacetime, and is based on a special solution of the Einstein field equations.

In philosophy, the philosophy of physics deals with conceptual and interpretational issues in physics, many of which overlap with research done by certain kinds of theoretical physicists. Historically, philosophers of physics have engaged with questions such as the nature of space, time, matter and the laws that govern their interactions, as well as the epistemological and ontological basis of the theories used by practicing physicists. The discipline draws upon insights from various areas of philosophy, including metaphysics, epistemology, and philosophy of science, while also engaging with the latest developments in theoretical and experimental physics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lee Smolin</span> American theoretical physicist (born 1955)

Lee Smolin is an American theoretical physicist, a faculty member at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Waterloo, and a member of the graduate faculty of the philosophy department at the University of Toronto. Smolin's 2006 book The Trouble with Physics criticized string theory as a viable scientific theory. He has made contributions to quantum gravity theory, in particular the approach known as loop quantum gravity. He advocates that the two primary approaches to quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity and string theory, can be reconciled as different aspects of the same underlying theory. He also advocates an alternative view on space and time that he calls temporal naturalism. His research interests also include cosmology, elementary particle theory, the foundations of quantum mechanics, and theoretical biology.

Julian Barbour is a British physicist with research interests in quantum gravity and the history of science.

Background independence is a condition in theoretical physics that requires the defining equations of a theory to be independent of the actual shape of the spacetime and the value of various fields within the spacetime. In particular this means that it must be possible not to refer to a specific coordinate system—the theory must be coordinate-free. In addition, the different spacetime configurations should be obtained as different solutions of the underlying equations.

Philosophy of space and time is the branch of philosophy concerned with the issues surrounding the ontology and epistemology of space and time. While such ideas have been central to philosophy from its inception, the philosophy of space and time was both an inspiration for and a central aspect of early analytic philosophy. The subject focuses on a number of basic issues, including whether time and space exist independently of the mind, whether they exist independently of one another, what accounts for time's apparently unidirectional flow, whether times other than the present moment exist, and questions about the nature of identity.

A temporal paradox, time paradox, or time travel paradox, is a paradox, an apparent contradiction, or logical contradiction associated with the idea of time travel or other foreknowledge of the future. While the notion of time travel to the future complies with the current understanding of physics via relativistic time dilation, temporal paradoxes arise from circumstances involving hypothetical time travel to the past – and are often used to demonstrate its impossibility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kalam cosmological argument</span> Philosophical argument for the existence of God

The Kalam cosmological argument is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. It is named after the Kalam from which many of its key ideas originated. Philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig was principally responsible for revitalizing these ideas for modern academic discourse through his book The Kalām Cosmological Argument (1979), as well as other publications.

Philosophical presentism is the view that only present entities exist. According to presentism, there are no past or future entities. In a sense, the past and the future do not exist for presentists—past events have happened and future events will happen, but neither exist at all since they do not exist now. Presentism is a view about temporal ontology that contrasts with eternalism—the view that past, present and future entities exist —and with no-futurism—the view that only past and present entities exist.

In philosophy, the Rietdijk–Putnam argument, named after C. Wim Rietdijk and Hilary Putnam, uses 20th-century findings in physics – specifically in special relativity – to support the philosophical position known as four-dimensionalism.

The B-theory of time, also called the "tenseless theory of time", is one of two positions regarding the temporal ordering of events in the philosophy of time. B-theorists argue that the flow of time is only a subjective illusion of human consciousness, that the past, present, and future are equally real, and that time is tenseless: temporal becoming is not an objective feature of reality. Therefore, there is nothing privileged about the present, ontologically speaking.

The Kodama state in physics for loop quantum gravity, is a zero energy solution to the Schrödinger equation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tim Maudlin</span> American philosopher of science (born 1958)

Tim William Eric Maudlin is an American philosopher of science who has done influential work on the metaphysical foundations of physics and logic.

<i>Time Reborn</i> Book by Lee Smolin

Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe is a 2013 book by the American theoretical physicist Lee Smolin.

In theoretical physics, the problem of time is a conceptual conflict between general relativity and quantum mechanics in that quantum mechanics regards the flow of time as universal and absolute, whereas general relativity regards the flow of time as malleable and relative. This problem raises the question of what time really is in a physical sense and whether it is truly a real, distinct phenomenon. It also involves the related question of why time seems to flow in a single direction, despite the fact that no known physical laws at the microscopic level seem to require a single direction.

In physics, a non-relativistic spacetime is any mathematical model that fuses n–dimensional space and m–dimensional time into a single continuum other than the (3+1) model used in relativity theory.

References

  1. ↑ Le Bihan, Baptiste (2020). "String theory, loop quantum gravity and eternalism". European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 10 (2): 17. arXiv: 2005.09335 . doi:10.1007/s13194-020-0275-3. S2CID   210958803.
  2. ↑ Kuipers, Theo A.F. (2007). General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues. North Holland. p. 326. ISBN   978-0-444-51548-3.
  3. ↑ Tim Maudlin (2010), "On the Passing of Time", The Metaphysics Within Physics, Oxford University Press, ISBN   9780199575374
  4. 1 2 3 Markosian, Ned (2014), "Time", in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 ed.), retrieved November 18, 2017
  5. ↑ Savitt, Steven F. (September 2000), "There's No Time Like the Present (in Minkowski Spacetime)", Philosophy of Science, 67 (S1): S563–S574, CiteSeerX   10.1.1.14.6140 , doi:10.1086/392846, S2CID   121275903
  6. ↑ Thomas M. Crisp (2007), William Lane Craig; Quentin Smith (eds.), "Presentism, Eternalism, and Relativity Physics" (PDF), Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity, footnote 1, archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-04-28, retrieved 2012-08-07
  7. ↑ Dean Rickles (2008), Symmetry, Structure, and Spacetime, Elsevier, p. 158, ISBN   9780444531162
  8. ↑ Wüthrich, Christian (2010). "No Presentism in Quantum Gravity". In Vesselin Petkov (ed.). Space, Time, and Spacetime: Physical and Philosophical Implications of Minkowski's Unification of Space and Time. Fundamental Theories of Physics. Springer. pp.  262–264. ISBN   9783642135378. LCCN   2010935080.
  9. ↑ Zimmerman, Dean (2011). "Presentism and the Space-Time Manifold". In C. Callender (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time (PDF). Oxford Handbooks in Philosophy. OUP Oxford. pp.163-244 (PDF p.119). ISBN   9780199298204. LCCN   2011283684.
  10. ↑ Yuri Balashov (2010), Persistence and Spacetime, Oxford University Press, p. 222
  11. ↑ Katherin A. Rogers (2007). "Anselmian Eternalism". Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27.
  12. ↑ Brian Leftow (2009). "Anselmian Presentism. Faith and Philosophy" 26 (3):297-319.
  13. ↑ Katherin Rogers (2009). "Back to Eternalism". Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.
  14. ↑ Rogers, Katherin (2008). Anselm on Freedom. Oxford University Press. p. 159. ISBN   9780199231676.
  15. ↑ From Kukkonen's chapter on "Eternity" in The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy edited by John Marenbon (2012), p. 529.
  16. ↑ John Polkinghorne (2011). Science and Religion in Quest of Truth, p. 64.
  17. ↑ J. M. E. McTaggart, "The Unreality of Time", Mind 17: 457–73; reprinted in J. M. E. McTaggart, The Nature of Existence, Vol. 2, 1927, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: Book 5, Chapter 33.
  18. ↑ Vorenkamp, Dirck (1995). "B-Series Temporal Order in Dogen's Theory of Time". Philosophy East and West, Volume 45, Number 3, 1995 July, P.387-408.
  19. ↑ Schneider, Susan (2016). Science Fiction and Philosophy:From Time Travel To SuperIntelligence (2nd ed.). John Wiley&Sons. pp. 370–384. ISBN   9781405149075.
  20. ↑ [Barbour, Julian, The End of Time, 1999 Oxford University Press ]
  21. ↑ Ellis (2006). "Physics in the Real Universe: Time and Spacetime". Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (12): 1797–1824. arXiv: gr-qc/0605049 . Bibcode:2006GReGr..38.1797E. doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0332-z. S2CID   119540219.
  22. ↑ Nikolic H. (2009). "Resolving the black-hole information paradox by treating time on an equal footing with space". Phys. Lett. B. 678 (2): 218–221. arXiv: 0905.0538 . Bibcode:2009PhLB..678..218N. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.06.029. S2CID   15074164.
  23. ↑ John Lucas The Future p8
  24. ↑ Popper, K.R. (2002). Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. Routledge Classics. Routledge. pp. 148–150. ISBN   9780415285896. LCCN   2002067996.
  25. ↑ "The Quantum Liar Experiment Kastner". Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 41 (2).
  26. ↑ "Time Reborn: a new theory of time - a new view of the world". Royal Society of Arts. May 21, 2013. Archived from the original on July 28, 2013.
  27. ↑ Cortês, Marina; Smolin, Lee (6 October 2014). "The universe as a process of unique events". Physical Review D. 90 (8): 084007. arXiv: 1307.6167 . Bibcode:2014PhRvD..90h4007C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.084007. S2CID   118557476.
  28. ↑ Smolin, Lee (2015). "Temporal naturalism". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B. 52: 86–102. arXiv: 1310.8539 . Bibcode:2015SHPMP..52...86S. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.03.005. S2CID   8344858.
  29. ↑ Smolin, Lee (30 April 2020). "Temporal Relationalism". In Nick Huggett; Keizo Matsubara; Christian Wuthrich (eds.). Beyond Spacetime. pp. 143–175. arXiv: 1805.12468 . doi:10.1017/9781108655705.010. ISBN   9781108655705. S2CID   118936279.
  30. ↑ Cortês, Marina; Smolin, Lee (10 January 2018). "Reversing the irreversible: From limit cycles to emergent time symmetry". Physical Review D. 97 (2): 026004. arXiv: 1703.09696 . Bibcode:2018PhRvD..97b6004C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.026004. S2CID   119067096.
  31. ↑ Falk, D. (2016, July 19). A Debate Over the Physics of Time. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-debate-over-the-physics-of-time-20160719/
  32. ↑ Elitzur, Avshalom C.; Dolev, Shahar (2005). "Quantum Phenomena Within a New Theory of Time". Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics?. The Frontiers Collection. pp. 325–349. doi:10.1007/3-540-26669-0_17. ISBN   3-540-22188-3.
  33. ↑ Elitzur, Avshalom C.; Dolev, Shahar (1999). "Black Hole Evaporation Entails an Objective Passage of Time". Foundations of Physics Letters. 12 (4): 309–323. arXiv: quant-ph/0012081 . Bibcode:1999FoPhL..12..309E. doi:10.1023/A:1021644319368. S2CID   15532826.
  34. ↑ Elitzur, Avshalom C.; Dolev, Shahar (2005). "Becoming as a bridge between quantum mechanics and relativity". Endophysics, Time, Quantum and the Subjective. pp. 589–606. doi:10.1142/9789812701596_0031. ISBN   978-981-256-509-9.
  35. ↑ Elitzur, A. C.; Dolev, S. (2003). "Is there more to T". The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 297–306. arXiv: quant-ph/0207029 .

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.