George Washington's political evolution

Last updated

  1. Colonial Virginia was a royal colony. It was governed by a bicameral legislature comprising a royally appointed governor and council, in whom most of the authority was vested, and a popularly elected House of Burgesses. [4]
  2. In the articles of surrender signed after the Battle of Fort Necessity, Washington had admitted to the assassination of Joseph Coulon de Jumonville at the Battle of Jumonville Glen who, the French claimed, was on a diplomatic mission. The articles of surrender were, according to John Huske, a former Boston merchant and future British Member of Parliament [28] [29] "the most infamous a British subject ever put his hand to." [30] [31] Washington claimed he would never have knowingly consented to an admission of assassination. He alleged his translator, Jacob Van Braam, had a poor grasp of English and implied that Van Braam acted treacherously to mistranslate the word "assassination" to "death" or "loss". [30] [31] [32]
  3. The route to be taken by Forbes to Fort Duquesne would generate economic advantages for landowners along that route. Virginians advocated for the existing route cleared by Washington and used by Braddock, while Pennsylvanians advocated for a new, more northerly route through their territory. Washington argued in support of the Virginian cause on the basis that the new route could not be completed before winter, but Forbes suspected him of acting in his own financial and political interests and chose, for military considerations, to take the Pennsylvanian route. [57]
  4. Washington had leased Mount Vernon from his brother's widow in December 1754 and inherited it on her death in 1761. [66]
  5. In his petition to the Executive Council and Virginia's new governor, Lord Botetourt in 1769, to make good the promise of land bounty, Washington suggested two hundred thousand acres (eight hundred and ten square kilometres) along the Monongahela and Kanawha rivers. Given that the surveyor for Augusta County, in which the land was located, would be too busy, he suggested someone else should be appointed to complete the surveys. When his suggestions were agreed, he successfully urged the appointment of William Crawford as the surveyor, whom two years previously Washington had commissioned to conduct a surreptitious survey of the land now allocated. Washington then accompanied Crawford on the initial exploratory trip in 1770 and took notes on the best land. As Crawford completed his surveys, he consulted with Washington, without the knowledge of any other officers, before the results were presented to the Executive Council. Washington then met with the officers, who were assured that there was no difference in quality between the various tracts, to agree how the land would be distributed. The Executive Council then allocated specific grants of land based on their recommendations. In this way, eighteen officers secured for themselves seven-eighths of the bounty lands that Dinwiddie had originally intended solely for enlisted men, men who had not been consulted throughout the process, and Washington secured for himself the best land. Some enlisted men complained when they discovered their land was worthless; some of the officers were a "good deal chagrined" when they first saw theirs. [80] Washington defended his actions by saying there would have been no grants of land without his initiative and effort. [81] [82]
  6. Ferling, like Chernow, cites Washington's frustration at the British military system that subordinated him to men of inferior rank. He also discusses the indignities Washington must have felt in the treatment he received from British officials such as Loudoun; the fact that Virginia's security during the French and Indian War had been dictated by British strategy, not Virginian; that London, not the colonies, controlled Indian diplomacy; that the Ohio Country was opened for settlement on British terms to a British timescale for the benefit of British interests; and that Parliament made all the imperial trade rules for the colonies, while the colonists had no representation and no say in British policy. [103]
  7. Historians differ as to the role Washington played in formulating the resolves; some credit Mason as the sole author while others suggest Washington had collaborated with Mason. [118]
  8. In addition to leading the Fairfax militia, Washington accepted command of the Prince William, Fauquier, Richmond and Spotsylvania county militias. He drilled Alexandria's militia, helped the Caroline and possibly Loudoun county militias to get gunpowder, and ordered training manuals, weapons and items of uniform from Philadelphia. [130] [128]
  9. The problems of operating separate provincial armies were manifold and well recognized. The New England provinces did not have the resources to conduct a long-term siege. They considered it unfair that New England should shoulder the main burden of the war effort and believed the conflict should be fought by an army financed, raised and supplied by all provinces. There was some mistrust of a New England army outside of New England. Congressmen attending the Second Continental Congress in May regarded as intolerable the unauthorized march of Massachusetts and Connecticut militias into New York to seize Fort Ticonderoga. [135] [136]
  10. After his defeat in the Battle of Long Island, Washington adopted a Fabian strategy that relied on evasion and hit-and-run attacks to wear down the enemy rather than a decisive pitched battle to defeat it. [160]
  11. In fact, Congress never contemplated Washington's removal, and the appointments were aimed at reforming the army, not at Washington. Only a tiny minority of congressmen sought his replacement, and he inspired loyalty in an overwhelming majority of his field officers. [164]
  12. According to Ferling, Washington played the Marquis de Lafayette, who served on his staff and was well connected with the French monarch, "like a virtuoso". Washington hinted to the young Frenchman that, if successful, the cabal's intrigues might destroy the revolution and all that France hoped to achieve from American independence. Lafayette, who only three months previously had praised his good friend and compatriot Conway as an officer who would "justify more and more the esteem of the army", duly condemned Conway to Congress as someone who possessed neither honor nor principles and who would resort to anything to satisfy his ambition. He also belittled Gates's success at Saratoga. Washington's young aides-de-camp, Alexander Hamilton and John Laurens  – whose father Henry was President of the Continental Congress  – also spoke out against Conway. General Nathanael Greene repeated Washington's accusation that both Mifflin and Gates were intriguing to ruin him. Other officers equated criticism of Washington with treason against the revolution. Suspected critics received visits from officers; Richard Peters was left terrified after a visit from Colonel Daniel Morgan. Conway escaped with a wound to the mouth after a duel with General John Cadwalader; Mifflin lost face when he declined Cadwalader's challenge. [168]
  13. When Conway arrived to take up his duties at Valley Forge, Washington greeted him icily and informed him he had no authority until written orders arrived. In a written reply, Conway mockingly equated Washington to Frederick the Great, the most esteemed general of the age. Washington simply forwarded the letter to Congress and let outraged indignation at the Frenchman's taunting effrontery to their commander-in-chief run its course. [173]
  14. The Society of the Cincinnati was a fraternal order of Revolutionary War officers which had attracted suspicion as an aristocratic and politically intrusive organization. Washington's association with the society threatened to sully his reputation. When it refused his attempts to abolish hereditary membership and his request not to elect him president, he sought to distance himself from it by not attending its meetings. Rather than offend his former comrades in arms, he masked his real concerns by stating that he was unable to attend the meeting in May because of business commitments and poor health. [204]
  15. Rhodehamel writes that after Mackay's arrival, "...Washington began an ill-considered advance from Fort Necessity toward the Forks of the Ohio. He scurried back to Fort Necessity when scouts reported that the French were marching against Great Meadows with a thousand men." [246] According to Longmore, Washington had made the decision to advance before the arrival of the South Carolinians. He moved out of Fort Necessity towards Redstone Creek on June 16 (and may have even entertained hopes of defeating the French at Fort Duquesne alone). By June 28, Washington was still short of the creek but within two days' march of the Forks when he received news that a large French force was approaching. He initially intended to defend the position, but when the South Carolinian contingent caught up with him the next day, Washington and Mackay agreed to fall back, bypassing even Fort Necessity. The whole journey, according to Longmore, took such a toll on the men and their transport that, on reaching Fort Necessity on July 1, they could go no further. [247] According to Ferling, Washington remained at Fort Necessity the entire period between the Battle of Jumonville Glen and the Battle of Fort Necessity. [248] Chernow mentions only that Washington's men were recalled to Fort Necessity on June 28, having been dispersed to build roads. [249]
  16. In a letter to Dinwiddie after the Battle of Jumonville Glen and following the appointment of Innes, Washington expressed his regret at losing the opportunity to gain more laurels now that "...a Head will soon arrive to whom all Honour[ sic ] and Glory must be given". [250] The provincial frontier officer William Johnson criticized Washington's aggression and accused him of "being too ambitious of acquiring all the honour[ sic ], or as much as he could, before the Rest joined him...". [33]
  17. In a letter to his wife written shortly after his appointment to the command of the Continental Army, Washington wrote, "so far from seeking this appointment, I have used every endeavor in my power to avoid it..." [275] [276] In a letter to his brother John Augustine two days later, he wrote that the appointment was "an honor I neither sought after, nor desired..." [277] [278] In another letter, written to William Gordon in 1778, he wrote, "I did not solicit the command, but accepted it after much entreaty." [273] His protestations were not limited to private correspondence; the same sentiments are reflected in a public letter he sent to officers of the independent companies of Virginia militia he commanded and published in newspapers. [279] Chernow and Longmore both recognise Washington's protestations of inadequacy were not baseless – where he had previously led a provincial regiment he was now tasked with leading a continental army. [276] [280]
  18. In September 1788, Hamilton advised Washington that a refusal would risk the fame which "must be ...dear to you." [290]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Revolutionary War</span> 1775–1783 American war of independence

The American Revolutionary War, also known as the Revolutionary War or American War of Independence, was a military conflict that was part of the broader American Revolution, where American Patriot forces organized as the Continental Army and commanded by George Washington defeated the British Army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Washington</span> Founding Father, 1st president of the United States

George Washington was an American Founding Father, military officer, and politician who served as the first president of the United States from 1789 to 1797. Appointed by the Second Continental Congress as commander of the Continental Army in 1775, Washington led Patriot forces to victory in the American Revolutionary War and then served as president of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which drafted and ratified the Constitution of the United States and established the U.S. federal government. Washington has thus been known as the "Father of his Country".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Lee (general)</span> American military officer (1732–1782)

Charles Lee was a British-born American military officer who served as a general of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. He also served earlier in the British Army during the Seven Years War. He sold his commission after the Seven Years War and served for a time in the Polish army of King Stanislaus II Augustus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Benjamin Harrison V</span> American Founding Father, planter, and merchant (1726–1791)

Benjamin Harrison V was an American planter, merchant, and politician who served as a legislator in colonial Virginia, following his namesakes' tradition of public service. He was a signer of the Continental Association, as well as the United States Declaration of Independence, and was one of the nation's Founding Fathers. He served as Virginia's governor from 1781 to 1784.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the United States (1776–1789)</span>

The history of the United States from 1776 to 1789 was marked by the nation's transition from the American Revolutionary War to the establishment of a novel constitutional order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horatio Gates</span> American general in the American Revolutionary War

Horatio Lloyd Gates was a British-born American army officer who served as a general in the Continental Army during the early years of the Revolutionary War. He took credit for the American victory in the Battles of Saratoga (1777) – a matter of contemporary and historical controversy – and was blamed for the defeat at the Battle of Camden in 1780. Gates has been described as "one of the Revolution's most controversial military figures" because of his role in the Conway Cabal, which attempted to discredit and replace General George Washington; the battle at Saratoga; and his actions during and after his defeat at Camden.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Monmouth</span> American Revolutionary War battle fought on June 28, 1778

The Battle of Monmouth, also known as the Battle of Monmouth Court House, was fought near Monmouth Court House in modern-day Freehold Borough, New Jersey on June 28, 1778, during the American Revolutionary War. It pitted the Continental Army, commanded by General George Washington, against the British Army in North America, commanded by General Sir Henry Clinton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conway Cabal</span> Group of senior Continental Army officers

The Conway Cabal was a group of senior Continental Army officers in late 1777 and early 1778 who aimed to have George Washington replaced as commander-in-chief of the Army during the American Revolutionary War. It was named after Brigadier General Thomas Conway, whose letters criticizing Washington were forwarded to the Second Continental Congress. When these suggestions were made public, supporters of Washington mobilized to assist him politically. Conway ended up resigning from the army, and General Horatio Gates, a leading candidate to replace Washington, issued an apology for his role in events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Founding Fathers of the United States</span> Leaders in the formation of the United States

The Founding Fathers of the United States, commonly referred to as the Founding Fathers, were a group of late-18th-century American revolutionary leaders who united the Thirteen Colonies, oversaw the War of Independence from Great Britain, established the United States of America, and crafted a framework of government for the new nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Washington in the French and Indian War</span>

George Washington's military experience began in the French and Indian War with a commission as a major in the militia of the British Province of Virginia. In 1753 Washington was sent as an ambassador from the British crown to the French officials and Indians as far north as present-day Erie, Pennsylvania. The following year he led another expedition to the area to assist in the construction of a fort at present-day Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Before reaching that point, he and some of his men, along with Mingo allies led by Tanacharison, ambushed a French scouting party. Its leader was killed, although the exact circumstances of his death were disputed. This peacetime act of aggression is seen as one of the first military steps leading to the global Seven Years' War. The French responded by attacking fortifications Washington erected following the ambush, forcing his surrender. Released on parole, Washington and his troops returned to Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Washington and slavery</span> George Washingtons relationship with slavery

The history of George Washington and slavery reflects Washington's changing attitude toward the ownership of human beings. The preeminent Founding Father of the United States and a hereditary slaveowner, Washington became increasingly uneasy with it. Slavery was then a longstanding institution dating back over a century in Virginia where he lived; it was also longstanding in other American colonies and in world history. Washington's will immediately freed one of his slaves, and required his remaining 123 slaves to serve his wife and be freed no later than her death, so they ultimately became free one year after his own death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidency of George Washington</span> U.S. presidential administration

The presidency of George Washington began on April 30, 1789, when Washington was inaugurated as the first president of the United States, and ended on March 4, 1797. Washington took office after the 1788–1789 presidential election, the nation's first quadrennial presidential election, in which he was elected unanimously by the Electoral College. Washington was re-elected unanimously in the 1792 presidential election and chose to retire after two terms. He was succeeded by his vice president, John Adams of the Federalist Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Washington in the American Revolution</span> Overview of George Washingtons position in the American Revolution

George Washington commanded the Continental Army in the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783). After serving as President of the United States, he briefly was in charge of a new army in 1798.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Adams</span> Founding Father, president of the United States from 1797 to 1801

John Adams was an American statesman, attorney, diplomat, writer, and Founding Father who served as the second president of the United States from 1797 to 1801. Before his presidency, he was a leader of the American Revolution that achieved independence from Great Britain. During the latter part of the Revolutionary War and in the early years of the new nation, he served the U.S. government as a senior diplomat in Europe. Adams was the first person to hold the office of vice president of the United States, serving from 1789 to 1797. He was a dedicated diarist and regularly corresponded with important contemporaries, including his wife and adviser Abigail Adams and his friend and political rival Thomas Jefferson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military career of George Washington</span>

The military career of George Washington spanned over forty-five years of service (1752–1799). Washington's service can be broken into three periods, French and Indian War, American Revolutionary War, and the Quasi-War with France, with service in three different armed forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confederation period</span> Era of United States history in the 1780s

The Confederation period was the era of United States history in the 1780s after the American Revolution and prior to the ratification of the United States Constitution. In 1781, the United States ratified the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union and prevailed in the Battle of Yorktown, the last major land battle between British and American Continental forces in the American Revolutionary War. American independence was confirmed with the 1783 signing of the Treaty of Paris. The fledgling United States faced several challenges, many of which stemmed from the lack of a strong national government and unified political culture. The period ended in 1789 following the ratification of the United States Constitution, which established a new, more powerful, national government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Fairfax</span>

William Fairfax (1691–1757) was a political appointee of the British Crown in several colonies as well as a planter and politician in the Colony of Virginia. Fairfax served as Collector of Customs in Barbados, Chief Justice and governor of the Bahamas; and Customs agent in Marblehead, Massachusetts, before being reassigned to the Virginia colony. In the Virginia Colony, Fairfax acted as a land agent for his cousin's vast holdings in the colony's northeast corner, known as the Northern Neck Proprietary. Also a tobacco planter himself, Fairfax was elected to the House of Burgesses representing King William County within the proprietary, which he helped split so that Fairfax County was created. Appointed to the Governor's Council, he rose to become its president. Fairfax also commissioned the construction of his plantation called Belvoir in what became Fairfax County to honor his family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early life and career of Thomas Jefferson</span>

Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States, was involved in politics from his early adult years. This article covers his early life and career, through his writing the Declaration of Independence, participation in the American Revolutionary War, serving as governor of Virginia, and election and service as Vice-President to President John Adams.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Post-presidency of George Washington</span> Overview of George Washingtons post-presidency

The post-presidency of George Washington began on March 4, 1797. The first U.S. president under the U.S. Constitution, Washington had served two consecutive terms in office. He returned to his beloved home, Mount Vernon, on March 15. Immediately, he began months of repair because of neglect and mismanagement. In time, he was able to restore the Mount Vernon mansion house. The salvaging of his farms proved to be problematic. Throughout his retirement, Washington entertained local friends, former official associates, and strangers who wished to converse and see the first president, the Revolutionary War hero, and founder of the nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of U.S. foreign policy, 1776–1801</span>

The history of U.S. foreign policy from 1776 to 1801 concerns the foreign policy of the United States during the twenty five years after the United States Declaration of Independence (1776). For the first half of this period, the U.S. f8, U.S. foreign policy was conducted by the presidential administrations of George Washington and John Adams. The inauguration of Thomas Jefferson in 1801 marked the start of the next era of U.S. foreign policy.

References

  1. Chernow 2010 pp. 21–22
  2. Ferling 2009 p. 9
  3. Chernow 2010 pp. 24–27
  4. Reich 2016 pp. 106–107
  5. Chernow 2010 pp. 35–36
  6. 1 2 Ferling 2009 p. 10
  7. Chernow 2010 pp. 26, 29
  8. Ferling 2009 pp. 10–11
  9. Chernow 2010 p. 28
  10. Ferling 2009 p. 12
  11. Longmore 1988 p. 13
  12. Ferling 2009 pp. 12–13
  13. Rhodehamel 2017 pp. 28–29
  14. Longmore 1988 p. 17
  15. Ferling 2009 p. 13
  16. Longmore 1988 p. 18
  17. Ferling 2009 pp. 15–18
  18. Longmore 1988 pp. 18–19, 32
  19. Ferling 2009 pp. 18–19
  20. Ferling 2009 p. 19
  21. Chernow 2010 pp. 66–67
  22. Ferling 2009 pp. 19–22
  23. Chernow 2010 p. 74
  24. Longmore 1988 p. 20
  25. Ferling 2009 pp. 23–24
  26. Longmore 1988 p. 19
  27. Chernow 2010 pp. 79–80
  28. Hayes 2017 p. 81
  29. "Huske, John (1724-73)". History of Parliament Online. The History of Parliament. Retrieved January 26, 2019.
  30. 1 2 Chernow 2010 pp. 77–78
  31. 1 2 Longmore 1988 p. 23
  32. Ferling 2009 p. 25
  33. 1 2 3 4 Longmore 1988 p. 24
  34. Chernow 2010 pp. 80–81
  35. Ferling 2009 pp. 26–27
  36. Chernow 2010 pp. 73–75
  37. Longmore 1988 p. 21
  38. Longmore 1988 pp. 20–21
  39. Chernow 2010 p. 82
  40. Chernow 2010 pp. 82–84
  41. Longmore 1988 p. 27
  42. Chernow 2010 pp. 90–94
  43. Longmore 1988 pp. 28–31
  44. 1 2 Longmore 1988 pp. 31–32
  45. 1 2 3 Ferling 2009 p. 30
  46. Chernow 2010 pp. 96–97
  47. Ferling 2009 pp. 30–31
  48. Chernow 2010 pp. 100, 102–103
  49. Ferling 2009 pp. 30–32
  50. Longmore 1988 pp. 34–38
  51. Chernow 2010 pp. 107–108
  52. Ferling 2009 pp. 38–39
  53. Ferling 2009 p. 35
  54. Longmore 1988 pp. 41–42
  55. Chernow 2010 pp. 111–112
  56. Chernow 2010 p. 127
  57. Ferling 2009 pp. 40–42
  58. Longmore 1988 pp. 40, 49
  59. Chernow 2010 pp. 131–132
  60. Chernow 2010 pp. 132–133
  61. 1 2 Ellis 2004 p. 63
  62. Longmore 1988 pp. 43–45
  63. 1 2 Chernow 2010 p. 134
  64. Longmore 1988 pp. 52–54
  65. Chernow 2010 pp. 79–81, 104, 128–130
  66. Chernow 2010 pp. 82, 137
  67. Ferling 2009 pp. 49–50
  68. Chernow 2010 p. 132
  69. Chernow 2010 pp. 117, 137–138
  70. Chernow 2010 p. 192
  71. 1 2 Longmore 1988 p. 90
  72. Chernow 2010 pp. 113–115, 137
  73. Chernow 2010 pp.145–147
  74. Chernow 2010 pp. 145, 190–191
  75. Chernow 2010 pp. 147–149
  76. Chernow 2010 pp. 201, 202
  77. Chernow 2010 pp. 186–187
  78. Longmore 1988 pp. 102–103
  79. Chernow 2010 pp. 187, 202
  80. Ferling 2009 pp. 62–66
  81. Longmore 1988 p. 104
  82. Chernow 2010 p. 204
  83. Chernow 2010 pp. 201–204
  84. Ferling 2009 pp. 66, 73
  85. Longmore 1988 p. 105
  86. Longmore 1988 pp. 105–107
  87. Chernow 2010 pp. 99–101, 128–129
  88. Chernow 2010 pp. 188–189
  89. Longmore 1988 pp. 87–88
  90. Chernow 2010 pp. 138–139
  91. Ferling 2009 p. 54
  92. Longmore 1988 pp. 61–63, 92
  93. Chernow 2010 pp. 187–189
  94. Ferling 2009 pp. 66–68
  95. Ferling 2009 p. 68
  96. Chernow 2010 pp. 196–197
  97. Ferling 2009 p. 69
  98. Longmore 1988 pp. 93–94
  99. Longmore 1988 pp. 94–95
  100. Longmore 1988 pp. 91–92
  101. "The Pulitzer Prizes | Citation". Pulitzer.org. 2012-12-13. Retrieved January 29, 2019.
  102. Chernow 2010 p. 196
  103. 1 2 Ferling p. 70
  104. Longmore 1988 pp. 89–90
  105. Longmore 1988 p. 98
  106. Ferling 2009 pp. 71–73
  107. Longmore 1988 p. 113
  108. Longmore 1988 pp. 107–109
  109. Ferling 2009 p. 73
  110. Ferling 2009 pp. 73–74
  111. Holten 1999 p. 36
  112. Chernow 2010 p. 225
  113. Longmore 1988 pp.112–113
  114. Longmore 1988 pp. 113–115
  115. Ferling 2009 p. 74
  116. Chernow 2010 p. 226
  117. Longmore 1988 p. 123
  118. Longmore 1988 pp. 123–124
  119. Ferling 2009 pp. 74–75
  120. Longmore 1988 pp. 123, 126, 130
  121. Longmore 1988 p. 131
  122. Ferling 2009 p. 76
  123. Ferling 2009 pp. 75–76
  124. Longmore 1988 pp. 127–129
  125. Longmore 1988 p. 137
  126. Ferling 2009 pp. 77–78
  127. Longmore 1988 p. 145
  128. 1 2 Ferling 2009 p. 79
  129. Longmore 1988 pp. 145–147
  130. Longmore 1988 p. 147
  131. Longmore 1988 p. 148
  132. Longmore 1988 p. 149
  133. Longmore 1988 pp. 150–152
  134. Ferling 2009 pp. 83–84
  135. Ferling 2009 p. 84
  136. 1 2 Longmore 1988 p. 161
  137. Chernow 2010 p. 244
  138. Ferling 2009 p. 223
  139. 1 2 Ferling 2009 p. 85
  140. Longmore 1988 pp. 161–162
  141. Longmore 1988 p. 163
  142. Longmore 1988 p. 176
  143. Longmore 1988 pp. 178–179
  144. Ferling 2009 p. 88
  145. Longmore 1988 pp. 189–190
  146. Ferling 2009 pp. 87–89
  147. Ferling 2009 pp. 92–93
  148. Ellis 2004 pp. 137–138
  149. Ferling 2009 p. 240
  150. Ellis 2004 p. 139
  151. Ferling 2009 pp. 231–235
  152. Longmore 1988 pp. 187–188
  153. Wills 1984 pp. xix–xxi
  154. Ellis 2004 p. 169
  155. Longmore 1988 pp. 27, 191
  156. Ferling 2009 p. 91
  157. Longmore 1988 pp. 150, 186–187, 191
  158. Longmore 1988 pp. 150, 189, 190
  159. Longmore 1988 pp. 191–193
  160. Ferling 2009 p. 111
  161. Ferling 2009 pp. 114–115, 119, 148–151
  162. Ferling 2009 pp. 127–128, 139
  163. Ferling 2009 pp. 152–153
  164. Ferling 2009 pp. 153–157
  165. Ferling 2009 p. 157
  166. Ferling 2009 pp. 161, 163–164
  167. Lender & Stone 2016 p. 42
  168. Ferling 2009 pp. 161–163
  169. Ferling 2009 pp. 162–163
  170. Ferling 2009 pp. 168–171
  171. Ferling 2009 pp. 183, 186–188
  172. Ferling 2009 pp. 150, 157–158
  173. Ferling 2009 pp. 157–158
  174. Ferling 2009 p. 118
  175. Ferling 2009 pp. 165, 171–174
  176. Chadwick 2005 p. 469
  177. Ellis 2004 pp. 126–127
  178. Ferling 2009 pp. 235–236
  179. Higginbotham 2004 p. 37
  180. Ferling 2009 pp. 238–239
  181. Wills 1984 p. 4
  182. 1 2 Wood 1993 pp. 205–206
  183. Ferling 2009 pp. 240, 243
  184. Ellis 2004 p. 147
  185. Ferling 2009 p. 238
  186. Ferling 2009 pp. 238, 260, 261
  187. Ferling 2009 pp. 242–243
  188. Chernow 2010 pp. 596–599
  189. Ellis 2004 p. 143
  190. Wills 1984 p. 3
  191. Wills 1984 pp. 3–10, 18
  192. Ferling 2009 pp. 243, 245–246
  193. Chernow 2010 p. 603
  194. Ferling 2009 pp. 246, 255–256
  195. Chernow 2010 p. 609
  196. Chernow 2010 p. 605
  197. Ferling 2009 p. 246
  198. Ferling 2009 pp. 245–255
  199. Ferling 2009 p. 259
  200. Ellis 2004 pp. 150, 168–171
  201. Chernow 2010 p. 605
  202. Ferling 2009 pp. 265–266
  203. Chernow 2010 pp. 676–678
  204. Ferling 2009 pp. 257–258
  205. 1 2 3 Ferling 2009 p. 266
  206. Chernow 2010 pp. 676, 678
  207. Brookhiser 1997 pp. 55–56
  208. Ellis 2004 p. 173
  209. 1 2 Chernow 2010 p. 677
  210. 1 2 Ferling 2009 p. 267
  211. Chernow 2010 pp. 678–679
  212. Chernow 2010 p. 679
  213. Ellis 2004 pp. 171–172, 175
  214. Chernow 2010 p. 680
  215. Ferling 2009 p. 268
  216. Ferling 2009 pp. 269–272
  217. Chernow 2010 pp. 703–704
  218. Chernow 2010 pp. 708, 714
  219. Ferling 2009 pp. 273–274
  220. Ellis 2004 p. 186
  221. Chernow 2010 p. 713
  222. Ferling 2009 pp. 291–294, 299–304
  223. Ferling 2009 pp. 304–305
  224. Ellis 2004 p. 220
  225. Ferling 2009 pp. 309–312
  226. Ferling 2009 pp. 323–324
  227. Ferling 2009 pp. 328, 337–340, 341, 343
  228. Ferling 2009 pp. 347–349
  229. Ellis 2004 pp. 238–239
  230. Ellis 2004 pp. 236–237
  231. Ferling 2009 pp. 353–359
  232. Ferling 2009 pp. 365–366
  233. Ferling 2009 pp. 5–6
  234. Lantzer 2001 p. 35
  235. Richard 1995 p. 70
  236. Wood 1992 p. 206
  237. Ferling 2009 p. xxi
  238. Longmore 1988 p. 1
  239. Ferling 2009 p. 6
  240. Ferling 2010 p. 58
  241. "Faculty and Staff: Pete Henriques". History and Art History Faculty and Staff. George Mason University. Retrieved January 25, 2019.
  242. Henriques 2008 p. 1
  243. "George Washington – Yale University Press". Yale University Press. Yale University. Retrieved January 25, 2019.
  244. Rhodehamel 2017 p. 24
  245. Ferling 2009 p. 21
  246. Rhodehamel 2017 p. 53
  247. Longmore 1988 pp. 21–23
  248. Ferling 2009 p. 23
  249. Chernow 2010 p. 75
  250. Longmore 1988 p. 22
  251. Longmore 1988 pp. 168–170
  252. Ferling 2009 pp. 88–89
  253. 1 2 Wood 1992 p. 207
  254. Ellis 2004 pp. 182–183
  255. Chernow 2010 p. 87
  256. Ellis 2004 pp. 70–71
  257. Longmore 1988 pp. 32–33
  258. Ferling 2009 p. 89
  259. Chernow 2010 p. 616
  260. Ferling 2009 p. 257
  261. Ellis 2004 pp. 153–154
  262. Ferling 2009 p. 256
  263. Chernow 2010 pp. 679–680
  264. Ellis 2004 pp. 220–221
  265. Chernow 2010 p. 176
  266. Longmore 1988 p. 67
  267. 1 2 Longmore 1988 p. 32
  268. Washington Vol. 1, p. 186
  269. Washington Vol. 1, p. 185
  270. Washington Vol. 1, p. 181
  271. Chernow 2010 pp. 97, 128
  272. Longmore 1988 pp. 168, 170
  273. 1 2 3 Chernow 2010 p. 248
  274. Ferling 2009 pp. 86–87
  275. Washington Vol. 2 p. 484
  276. 1 2 Longmore 1988 p. 168
  277. Washington Vol. 2 p. 491
  278. Ferling 2009 p. 89
  279. Longmore 1988 p. 174
  280. Chernow 2010 p. 251
  281. Ferling 2009 p. 87
  282. Longmore 1988 pp. 169–170, 171–182
  283. Chernow 2010 p. 676
  284. "Undelivered First Inaugural Address: Fragments, 30 April 1789". National Archives Founders Online. 17. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
  285. Chernow 2010 pp. 678–680
  286. Ellis 2004 p. 171
  287. Chernow 2010 p. 708
  288. Ferling 2009 pp. 273–274
  289. Henriques 2008 pp. 49, 208
  290. 1 2 Ferling 2009 p. 274
  291. Ellis 2004 pp. 182, 187

Bibliography

Primary sources

George Washington
Washington-patriae-pater.jpg
Major, Virginia Militia
In office
November 1752 February 1754