Human trophy collecting

Last updated

American sailor with the skull of a Japanese soldier during World War II. AWM 072837.jpg
American sailor with the skull of a Japanese soldier during World War II.

The practice of human trophy collecting involves the acquisition of human body parts as trophy, usually as war trophy. The intent may be to demonstrate dominance over the deceased (such as scalp-taking or forming necklaces of severed ears or teeth), to humiliate or intimidate the enemy (such as shrunken heads or skull cups), or in some rare cases to commemorate the deceased (such as the veneration of the relics of saints). It can be done to prove one's body count in battle, [1] to boast one's prowess and achievements to peers, [2] or as a status symbol of superior masculinity. [3] Serial killers' collection of their victims' body parts have also been described as a form of trophy-taking. [4]

Contents

While older customs generally included the burial of human war trophies along with the collector, such items have been sold in modern times. [5]

History

In the Old Testament, King Saul asked David to bring him one hundred Philistine foreskins as bride price for his daughter Michal. David and his men fought a battle, and he presented the king with 200. [6]

Headhunting has been practiced across the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Oceania for millennia. [5] One analysis of the practice in early North American societies linked it to social distance from the victim. [7] Groups such as the Scythians collected the skulls of the vanquished to make a skull cup. [8]

In the Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598), the noses and ears of slain Koreans and Chinese were collected and brought back to Japan, where they were placed in the Mimizuka monument in Kyoto. As of 2022, it still stands. [9]

In North America, it was common practice before, during or after the lynching of African-Americans for the European Americans involved to take souvenirs such as body parts, skin, bones, genitalia, etc. [10] [11]

In the United States, trophies were also acquired during conquest of indigenous lands by settlers and other Native American groups. The scalp, skull, and wrist-bones of Little Crow, the Mdewakanton leader during the Minnesota hostilities of 1862, were obtained and displayed for decades at the Minnesota Historical Society as war trophies from Minnesota's bounty on the Santee Sioux. The MHS is established in the Constitution of the Minnesota Territory. [12] In another instance connected to battlefield success and to the American mutilation of Japanese war dead, President of the United States Franklin Roosevelt was given a gift of a letter-opener made of a Japanese soldier's arm by U.S. Representative Francis E. Walter in 1944. [13] [14] After a call by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Tokyo for "respect for the laws of humanity even in total war" Roosevelt ordered the item to be returned to its sender and recommended it be properly buried. [15]

In addition to human body parts appearing in museums and artifact collections in the explicit context of historical conquest, they are also included for both putative and actual scientific reasons, particularly scientific racism establishing justification for dominance over subject races. The body of William Lanne, the last "full-blooded" Tasmanian Aboriginal man, was mutilated after his death in 1869 by William Crowther [16] who later became the Premier of Tasmania, and Lanne's skull was sent to the Royal College of Surgeons in London to supposedly demonstrate "the improvement that takes place in the lower race when subjected to the effects of education and civilisation". [17] Crowther's mutilation of Lanne proved immensely controversial in Tasmania. [18]

During the German Empire's Herero and Namaqua genocide in German South West Africa at the beginning of the twentieth century, specimens of African body parts were obtained and taken to German museums and academic institutions, in some instances in the aftermath of medical experimentation on human subjects. [19] In 2011, when some of these items were returned to present-day Namibia, the rector of the University of Freiburg referred to the period of their acquisition as "one of the dark chapters in the history of European science". [20] Later in the century the Jewish skull collection and other medical resources were the result of Nazi Germany's human experimentation programs and other elements of the Holocaust.

The practice occurred during World War II and the Vietnam War. About 60% of the bodies of Japanese soldiers recovered in the Mariana Islands and returned to Japan lacked skulls. [5] The practice continued up until the 20th century in the Balkans.

Other examples

Well, these white guys would sometimes take the dog-tag chain and fill that up with ears. For different reasons. They would take the ear off to make sure the VC was dead. And to confirm that they had a kill. And to put some notches on they guns.If we were movin' through the jungle, they'd just put the bloody ear on the chain and stick the ear in their pocket and keep on going. Wouldn't take time to dry it off. Then when we get back, they would nail 'em up on the walls to our hootch, you know, as a trophy. They was rotten and stinkin' after awhile, and finally we make 'em take 'em down.

Trade

Trophy skulls with purported colonial-era ethnic engravings were widely sold online at various platforms. In 2005, Royal Malaysian Customs Department seized 16 human skulls with engravings that were purported to originate from northwest of West Kalimantan province, somewhere between Pontianak and the Sarawak border, and bound for an unknown buyer in Australia. These seized skulls were transferred to Sarawak State Museum in 2015. [24]

Body-snatching

Body-snatchings are sometimes conducted to retain a body part as a trophy. [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human cannibalism</span> Practice of humans eating other humans

Human cannibalism is the act or practice of humans eating the flesh or internal organs of other human beings. A person who practices cannibalism is called a cannibal. The meaning of "cannibalism" has been extended into zoology to describe animals consuming parts of individuals of the same species as food.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lynching</span> Extrajudicial killing by a group

Lynching is an extrajudicial killing by a group. It is most often used to characterize informal public executions by a mob in order to punish an alleged transgressor, punish a convicted transgressor, or intimidate people. It can also be an extreme form of informal group social control, and it is often conducted with the display of a public spectacle for maximum intimidation. Instances of lynchings and similar mob violence can be found in every society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doddsville, Mississippi</span> Town in Mississippi, United States

Doddsville is a town in Sunflower County, Mississippi. The population was 98 at the 2010 census. It was established by Daniel Doddsman Sr. in 1889.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Headhunting</span> Practice of hunting a human and collecting the severed head after killing the victim

Headhunting is the practice of hunting a human and collecting the severed head after killing the victim, although sometimes more portable body parts are taken instead as trophies. Headhunting was practiced in historic times in parts of Europe, East Asia, Oceania, Southeast Asia, South Asia, Mesoamerica, South America, West Africa and Central Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mutilation</span> Act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body

Mutilation or maiming is severe damage to the body that has a subsequent utterly ruinous effect on an individual's quality of life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scalping</span> Act of removing part of the human scalp with hair still attached

Scalping is the act of cutting or tearing a part of the human scalp, with hair attached, from the head, and generally occurred in warfare with the scalp being a trophy. Scalp-taking is considered part of the broader cultural practice of the taking and display of human body parts as trophies, and may have developed as an alternative to the taking of human heads, for scalps were easier to take, transport, and preserve for subsequent display. Scalping independently developed in various cultures in both the Old and New Worlds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Body snatching</span> Secret removal of corpses from burial sites

Body snatching is the illicit removal of corpses from graves, morgues, and other burial sites. Body snatching is distinct from the act of grave robbery as grave robbing does not explicitly involve the removal of the corpse, but rather theft from the burial site itself. The term 'body snatching' most commonly refers to the removal and sale of corpses primarily for the purpose of dissection or anatomy lectures in medical schools. The term was coined primarily in regard to cases in the United Kingdom and United States throughout the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. However, there have been cases of body snatching in many countries, with the first recorded case dating back to 1319 in Bologna, Italy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crow Creek massacre</span> United States historic place

The Crow Creek massacre occurred around the mid-14th century AD and involved Native American groups at a site along the upper Missouri River in the South Dakota area; it is now within the Crow Creek Indian Reservation. Crow Creek Site, the site of the massacre near Chamberlain, is an archaeological site and a U.S. National Historic Landmark, located at coordinates 43°58′48″N 99°19′54″W. An excavation of part of the site was done in the 1950s, at the time of dam construction on the river. Additional excavations were conducted in 1978 and later.

A torture murder is a murder where death was preceded by the torture of the victim. In many legal jurisdictions a murder involving "exceptional brutality or cruelty" will attract a harsher sentence if the killing is not sanctioned by authorities or carried out by state security forces themselves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Lanne</span> Aboriginal Tasmanian man

William Lanne, also spelt William Lanné and also known as King Billy or William Laney, was an Aboriginal Tasmanian man, known for being the last "full-blooded" Aboriginal man in the colony of Tasmania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mangas Coloradas</span> Apache tribal chief

Mangas Coloradas or Mangus-Colorado, or Dasoda-hae was an Apache tribal chief and a member of the Mimbreño (Tchihende) division of the Central Apaches, whose homeland stretched west from the Rio Grande to include most of what is present-day southwestern New Mexico. He was the father-in-law of Chiricahua (Tsokanende) chief Cochise, Mimbreño chief Victorio, and Mescalero (Sehende) chief Kutu-hala or Kutbhalla. He is regarded as one of the most important Native American leaders of the 19th century because of his fighting achievements against the Mexicans and Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Crowther (Australian politician)</span> Tasmanian politician (1817–1885)

William Lodewyk Crowther FRCS was a Tasmanian politician, who was Premier of Tasmania from 20 December 1878 to 29 October 1879.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human sacrifice in Aztec culture</span> Aztec rite

Human sacrifice was common in many parts of Mesoamerica, so the rite was nothing new to the Aztecs when they arrived at the Valley of Mexico, nor was it something unique to pre-Columbian Mexico. Other Mesoamerican cultures, such as the Purépechas and Toltecs, and the Maya performed sacrifices as well and from archaeological evidence, it probably existed since the time of the Olmecs, and perhaps even throughout the early farming cultures of the region. However, the extent of human sacrifice is unknown among several Mesoamerican civilizations. What distinguished Aztec practice from Maya human sacrifice was the way in which it was embedded in everyday life. These cultures also notably sacrificed elements of their own population to the gods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American mutilation of Japanese war dead</span> Aspect of WWII history

During World War II, some members of the United States military mutilated dead Japanese service personnel in the Pacific theater. The mutilation of Japanese service personnel included the taking of body parts as "war souvenirs" and "war trophies". Teeth and skulls were the most commonly taken "trophies", although other body parts were also collected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nose tomb</span> Tombs containing noses in Japan

Nose tombs are tombs that contain human noses or other body parts that were brought back to Japan as trophies during the Japanese invasions of Korea in the late 16th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human trophy taking in Mesoamerica</span>

Most of the ancient civilizations of Mesoamerica such as the Olmec, Maya, Mixtec, Zapotec and Aztec cultures practiced some kind of taking of human trophies during warfare. Captives taken during war would often be taken to their captors' city-states where they would be ritually tortured and sacrificed. These practices are documented by a rich material of iconographic and archaeological evidence from across Mesoamerica.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human sacrifice in Maya culture</span>

During the pre-Columbian era, human sacrifice in Maya culture was the ritual offering of nourishment to the gods and goddesses. Blood was viewed as a potent source of nourishment for the Maya deities, and the sacrifice of a living creature was a powerful blood offering. By extension, the sacrifice of human life was the ultimate offering of blood to the gods, and the most important Maya rituals culminated in human sacrifice. Generally, only high-status prisoners of war were sacrificed, and lower status captives were used for labor.

James J. Weingartner is professor emeritus of history at Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville. He is a specialist in German history and the history of Nazism. He is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin at Madison.

Luther Holbert was an African American man who was tortured and lynched by a mob in Doddsville, Mississippi on Sunday, February 7, 1904, after being accused of a double murder. An African American woman who was with Holbert was also tortured and killed. Six other people were also killed during the search for Holbert and the woman.

References

  1. Academic American Encyclopedia. Vol. 10. Danbury, California: Grolier. 1997. ISBN   978-0717220687. In some cultures head-hunting can be considered a manifestation of the widespread practice of removing parts of the body of a slain enemy – as in scalping or the severing of an ear or nose – for war trophies.
  2. Selbie, John A. (1913). "The head as trophy or cult object". Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. Vol. 6. p. 534. ISBN   978-0543978707.
  3. Knight, Rachel K. (December 2017). "Migration, Masculinity, and Mastering the "Queue": A Case of Chinese Scalping" (PDF). Journal of World History . Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press. 28 (3–4).
  4. Fox, James Alan; Levin, Jack (January 1998). "Multiple Homicide: Patterns of Serial and Mass Murder". Crime and Justice . Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. 23: 407–455. doi:10.1086/449274. S2CID   145738770.
  5. 1 2 3 Quigley, Christine (2005). The Corpse: A History. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland. pp. 249–251. ISBN   978-0786424498 . Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  6. "1 Samuel 18:25-27"  . King James Version . 1611 via Wikisource.
  7. Chacon, Richard J.; Dye, David H. (2007). The taking and displaying of human body parts as trophies by Amerindians. New York City: Springer. pp. 32, 33. ISBN   978-0387483009 . Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  8. Bello, Silvia M.; Parfitt, Simon A.; Stringer, Chris B. (February 2011). Petraglia, Michael (ed.). "Earliest Directly-Dated Human Skull-Cups". PLOS ONE . San Francisco, California: Public Library of Science. 6 (2): e17026. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...617026B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017026 . PMC   3040189 . PMID   21359211.
  9. Sansom, George Bailey (1961). A History of Japan, 1334–1615 . Stanford studies in the civilizations of eastern Asia. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. pp.  360. ISBN   0-8047-0525-9. Visitors to Kyoto used to be shown the Minizuka or Ear Tomb, which contained, it was said, the noses of those 38,000, sliced off, suitably pickled, and sent to Kyoto as evidence of victory.
  10. Lynching in America: Confronting the Legacy of Racial Terror (Report) (3rd ed.). Montgomery, Alabama: Equal Justice Initiative. 2017. p. 14. Archived from the original on 10 May 2018. Public spectacle lynchings were those in which large crowds of European Americans, often numbering in the thousands, gathered to witness pre-planned, heinous killings that featured prolonged torture, mutilation, dismemberment, and/or burning of the victim. Many were carnival-like events, with vendors selling food, printers producing postcards featuring photographs of the lynching and corpse, and the victim's body parts collected as souvenirs.
  11. Sinclair, William Albert (1905). The Aftermath of Slavery; A Study of the Condition and Environment of the American Negro. Boston, Massachusetts: Small, Maynard & Company. p. 250. hdl:2027/nyp.33433081793485. The Nashville (Tennessee) American gives an account of a lynching in Mississippi as follows: "But there was a lynching in that state that for fiendish brutality has not yet been surpassed, even when the victims have been roasted at the stake. It occurred at Doddsville, recently, and these are the circumstances as related by local newspapers: Luther Holbert, a negro, had a quarrel with a white man and, following the usual Mississippi method, they exchanged shots, the negro escaping and the white man being killed. The negro, knowing the penalty for killing a white man in that section, fled, of course, accompanied by his wife, who had had no part in the quarrel. They were captured by the mob and this is what was done to them, according to the statement of an eye-witness in the Vicksburg Herald."'When the two negroes were captured they were tied to trees, and while the funeral pyres were being prepared they were forced to suffer the most fiendish tortures. The blacks were forced to hold out their hands while one finger at a time was chopped off. The fingers were distributed as souvenirs. The ears of the murderers were cut off. Holbert was severely beaten, his skull was fractured, and one of his eyes, knocked out with a stick, hung by a shred from the socket. Neither the man nor the woman begged for mercy, nor made a groan or plea. When the executioners came forward to lop off fingers, Holbert extended his hand without being asked. The most excruciating form of punishment consisted in the use of a large corkscrew in the hands of one of the mob. This instrument was bored into the flesh of the man and the woman, in the arms, legs, and body, and pulled out, the spiral tearing out big pieces of raw, quivering flesh every time it was withdrawn.'""
  12. "Little War on the Prairie". This American Life. Season 2012. Episode 479. 23 November 2012. 48 minutes in. Little Crow was shot six months after the hangings and his scalp, skull, and wristbones were displayed at the Minnesota Historical Society for decades.
  13. Weingartner, James J. (February 1992). "Trophies of War: U.S. Troops and the Mutilation of Japanese War Dead, 1941-1945". Pacific Historical Review . University of California Press. 61 (1): 65. doi:10.2307/3640788. JSTOR   3640788. Archived from the original on 11 August 2011. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
  14. Harrison, Simon (2006). "Skull Trophies of the Pacific War: transgressive objects of remembrance". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute . 12 (4): 825. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00365.x.
  15. "Roosevelt Rejects Gift Made of Japanese Bone" . Business Financial. The New York Times . Associated Press. 10 August 1944. p. 30. ISSN   0362-4331.
  16. "Atrocious Outrage on the Last Native Tasmanian"  . Grey River Argus. 6 April 1869.
  17. Lawson, Tom (2014). The Last Man: A British Genocide in Tasmania. I.B. Tauris. pp. 166–168. ISBN   9781780766263.
  18. Crowther, William Edward Lodewyk Hamilton (1969). "Crowther, William Lodewyk (1817–1885)". Australian Dictionary of Biography . Vol. 3. National Centre of Biography, Australian National University. pp. 501–503. ISSN   1833-7538 . Retrieved 1 September 2007.
  19. "Germans return skulls to Namibia". The Times . Johannesburg. 27 September 2011. Archived from the original on 27 September 2011.
  20. "Repatriation of Skulls from Namibia: University of Freiburg hands over human remains in ceremony" (Press release). University of Freiburg. 4 March 2014. Archived from the original on 23 April 2015. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
  21. Attala, Luci; Steel, Louise (1 May 2019). Body Matters: Exploring the Materiality of the Human Body. Cardiff, Wales: University of Wales Press. p. 166. ISBN   978-1-78683-416-4.
  22. Chacon, Richard J.; Dye, David H. (2007). The taking and displaying of human body parts as trophies by Amerindians. New York City: Springer. p. 26. ISBN   978-0387483009.
  23. Terry, Wallace (1984). Bloods: An Oral History of the Vietnam War by Black Veterans. New York City: Random House. p.  26. ISBN   978-0394530284.
  24. Huffer, Damien; Guerreiro, Antonio; Graham, Shawn (July 2021). "Osteological Assessment of a Seized Shipment of Modified Human Crania: Implications for Dayak Cultural Heritage Preservation and the Global Human Remains Trade". Journal of Borneo-Kalimantan. Sarawak, Malaysia: Institute of Borneo Studies (IBS), Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. 7 (1). Retrieved 18 July 2021.
  25. Ellis, Bill (2000). Raising the Devil: Satanism, New Religions, and the Media. Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. p. 235. ISBN   978-0813121703 . Retrieved 30 January 2011. [...] a self-confessed robber came forward and admitted the body-snatching [...] leaving the body in the car [...] he took the head home and kept it on his matelpiece as a trophy of his visit [...]