Allied war crimes during World War II

Last updated

Allied war crimes include both alleged and legally proven violations of the laws of war by the Allies of World War II against either civilians or military personnel of the Axis powers.


At the end of World War II, many trials of Axis war criminals took place, most famously the Nuremberg Trials and Tokyo Trials. However, in Europe, these tribunals were set up under the authority of the London Charter, which only considered allegations of war crimes committed by people who acted in the interests of the Axis powers.

Some war crimes involving Allied personnel were investigated by the Allied powers and led in some instances to courts-martial. Some incidents alleged by historians to have been crimes under the law of war in operation at the time were, for a variety of reasons, not investigated by the Allied powers during the war, or were investigated and a decision was taken not to prosecute.


The Western Allies claim that their militaries were directed to observe the Hague Conventions and Geneva Conventions and believed to be conducting a just war fought for defensive reasons. Violations of the conventions did occur, however, including the forcible return of Soviet citizens who had been collaborating with Axis forces to the USSR at the end of the war. The military of the Soviet Union also frequently committed war crimes, which are today known to have been at the direction of its government. These crimes included waging wars of aggression, mass murder and genocide of prisoners of war, and repressing the population of conquered countries. [1]

Antony Beevor describes the Soviet rape of German women during the occupation of Germany as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has estimated that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania, and Silesia alone. He asserts that Soviet women and girls liberated from slave labor in Germany were also violated. [2]

The German historian and left-wing antiwar activist Jörg Friedrich argues that Allied aerial bombardment of civilian areas and cultural targets in enemy territory, including the German cities of Cologne, Hamburg, and Dresden, the Abbey in Monte Cassino in Italy during the Battle of Monte Cassino, [3] the Japanese cities of Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka, and especially the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which resulted in the total destruction of cities and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians, should be considered war crimes [4] [5] [6] but no positive or specific customary international humanitarian law with respect to aerial warfare existed prior to and during World War II. [7] This is also why no Japanese and German officers were prosecuted at the post-World War II Allied war crime trials for the aerial raids on Shanghai, Chongqing, Warsaw, Rotterdam, and British cities during the Blitz. [8]

Western Allies


Charles P. Stacey, the Canadian official campaign historian, reports that on 14 April 1945 rumours spread that the popular commanding officer of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders of Canada, Lieutenant Colonel Frederick E. Wigle, had been killed by a civilian sniper. This rumour resulted in the Highlanders setting fire to civilian property in the town of Friesoythe in an act of reprisal. [9] Stacey later wrote that the Canadian troops first removed German civilians from their property before setting the houses on fire; he commented that he was "glad to say that [he] never heard of another such case". [10] It was later found that German soldiers had killed the Argyll's commander. [11]



Following the Operation Dragoon landings in southern France and the collapse of the German military occupation in August 1944, large numbers of Germans could not escape from France and surrendered to the French Forces of the Interior. The Resistance executed a few of the Wehrmacht and most of the Gestapo or SS prisoners. [12]

The Maquis also executed 17 German prisoners of war at Saint-Julien-de-Crempse (in the Dordogne region), on 10 September 1944, 14 of whom have since been positively identified. The murders were revenge killings for German murders of 17 local inhabitants of the village of St. Julien on 3 August 1944, which were themselves reprisal killings in response to Resistance activity in the St. Julien region, which was home to an active Maquis cell. [13]

Moroccan Goumiers

French Moroccan troops of the French Expeditionary Corps, known as Goumiers, committed mass crimes in Italy during and after the Battle of Monte Cassino [14] and in Germany. [15] According to Italian sources, more than 12,000 civilians, above all young and old women, children, were kidnapped, raped, or killed by Goumiers. [16] This is featured in the Italian film La Ciociara ( Two Women ) with Sophia Loren.

Anthony Clayton in his book 'France, Soldiers, and Africa' (Brassey's Defence Publishers, 1988) devotes several pages to the criminal activities of the Goumiers, which he partially ascribes to the record of what was considered normal practices in their homeland.

United Kingdom

On 4 May 1940, in response to Germany's intensive unrestricted submarine warfare, during the Battle of the Atlantic and its invasion of Denmark and Norway, the Royal Navy conducted its own unrestricted submarine campaign. The Admiralty announced that all vessels in the Skagerrak were to be sunk on sight without warning. This was contrary to the terms of the Second London Naval Treaty. [17] [18]

In July 1941, the submarine HMS Torbay (under the command of Anthony Miers) was based in the Mediterranean where it sank several German ships. On two occasions, once off the coast of Alexandria, Egypt, and the other off the coast of Crete, the crew attacked and killed dozens of shipwrecked German sailors and troops. None of the shipwrecked survivors posed a major threat to Torbay's crew. Miers made no attempt to hide his actions, and reported them in his official logs. He received a strongly worded reprimand from his superiors following the first incident. Mier's actions violated the Hague Convention of 1907, which banned the killing of shipwreck survivors under any circumstances. [19] [20]

During Operation Overlord, British line of communication troops conducted small-scale looting in Bayeux and Caen in France, following their liberation, in violation of the Hague Conventions. [21] Looting, rape, and prisoner execution was committed by British soldiers in a smaller scale than other armies throughout the war. [22] On 23 May 1945, British troops in Schleswig-Holstein were alleged to have plundered Glücksburg castle, stealing jewellery, and desecrating 38 coffins from the castle's mausoleum. [23]

The "London Cage", a MI19 prisoner of war facility in the UK during and immediately after the war, was subject to allegations of torture. [24] The Bad Nenndorf interrogation centre in occupied Germany, managed by the Combined Services Detailed Interrogation Centre, was the subject of an official inquiry in 1947, which found that there was "mental and physical torture during the interrogations" and that "personal property of the prisoners were stolen". [25]

The Italian statistics record eight rapes and nineteen attempted rape by British soldiers in Italy between September 1943 and December 1945. Various sources, including the Special Investigation Branch as well as evidences from Belgian reporters, said that rape and sexual harassment by British troops occurred frequently following the invasion of Sicily in 1943. [26]

In Germany, rapes of local women were committed by British and Canadian troops. [27] Even elderly women were targeted. [27] Though the Royal Military Police tended to turn a blind eye towards abuse of German prisoners and civilians who obstructed the army, rape was considered differently. Some officers, however, treated the behavior of their men with leniency. Some rapes were impulsively committed under the effects of alcohol or post-traumatic stress, but there were cases of premeditated attacks, such as the rape of three German women in the town of Neustadt am Rübenberge or the attempted rape of two local girls at gunpoint in the village of Oeyle, near Nienburg, which ended in the death of one of the girls when, whether intentionally or not, one of the soldiers discharged his gun, hitting her in the neck. [27]

There were also reports of "sexual assault and indecency" committed by British soldiers against children in Belgium and the Netherlands, when a number of men were convicted of these crimes while fraternizing with Dutch and Belgian families during the winter of 1944–1945. [27]

United States

Photo showing execution of Waffen-SS troops in a coal yard in the area of the Dachau concentration camp during its liberation. April 29, 1945 (US Army photograph) Dachau execution coalyard 1945-04-29.jpg
Photo showing execution of Waffen-SS troops in a coal yard in the area of the Dachau concentration camp during its liberation. April 29, 1945 (US Army photograph)

Eastern Allies

Soviet Union

The Soviet Union had not signed the Geneva Convention of 1929 that protected, and stated how prisoners of war should be treated. This cast doubt on whether the Soviet treatment of Axis prisoners was therefore a war crime, although prisoners "were [not] treated even remotely in accordance with the Geneva Convention", [50] resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands. [51] [ unreliable source? ] However, the Nuremberg Tribunal rejected this as a general argument. The tribunal held that the Hague Conventions (which the 1929 Geneva Convention did not replace but only augmented, and unlike the 1929 convention, were ones that the Russian Empire had ratified) and other customary laws of war, regarding the treatment of prisoners of war, were binding on all nations in a conflict whether they were signatories to the specific treaty or not. [52] [53] [54]

One of first soviet war crime was Katyn massacre (Polish: zbrodnia katyńska, "Katyń crime"; Russian: Катынская резня Katynskaya reznya, "Katyn massacre", or Russian: Катынский расстрел, "Katyn execution by shooting") was a series of mass executions of Polish military officers and intelligentsia carried out by the Soviet Union, specifically the NKVD ("People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs", aka the Soviet secret police) in April and May 1940. Though the killings took place at several places, the massacre is named after the Katyn Forest, where some of the mass graves were first discovered.

Acts of mass rape and other war crimes were committed by Soviet troops during the occupation of East Prussia (Danzig), [55] [56] [57] [58] parts of Pomerania and Silesia, during the Battle of Berlin, [59] and during the Battle of Budapest.[ citation needed ]

Late in the war, Yugoslavia's communist partisans complained about the rapes and looting committed by the Soviet Army while traversing their country. Milovan Djilas later recalled Joseph Stalin's response,

Does Djilas, who is himself a writer, not know what human suffering and the human heart are? Can't he understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometers through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle? [60]

Soviet war correspondent Natalya Gesse observed the Red Army in 1945: "The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty. It was an army of rapists". Polish women as well as Russian, Belorussian and Ukrainian slave laborers were also mass raped by the Red Army. The Soviet war correspondent Vasily Grossman described: "Liberated Soviet girls quite often complain that our soldiers rape them". [61]

The Gegenmiao massacre of 1945; rapes and massacres conducted by the Soviet Army over half a group of 1,800 Japanese women and children who had taken refuge in the lamasery Gegenmiao/Koken-miao (葛根廟) during the Soviet invasion of Manchuria. [62]


Armed conflictPerpetrator
World War II in Yugoslavia Yugoslav Partisans
IncidentType of crimePersons
Bleiburg repatriations Alleged war crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.The victims were Yugoslav collaborationist troops (ethnic Croats, Serbs, and Slovenes). They were executed without trial in an act of vengeance for the genocide committed by the pro-Axis collaborationist states (in particular the Ustaše) installed by the Nazis during the German occupation of Yugoslavia. [63]
Foibe massacres War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.Following Italy's 1943 armistice with the Allied powers, and again after the end of the German occupation of Istria in 1945, Yugoslav resistance forces executed an unknown number (ranging from several hundreds to some thousands) of ethnic Italians accused of collaboration, regardless of their personal responsibility. [64] [65]
Communist purges in Serbia in 1944–45 War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.1944–1945 killings of ethnic Germans and Hungarians in Bačka, and Serb prisoners of war. [66]
Kočevski Rog massacre War crimes, crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families. [67]
Macelj massacre Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families. [68]
Tezno trench Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families. [69]
Barbara Pit Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families. [70]
Prevalje mass grave Crimes against humanity: murder of prisoners of war and civilians.No prosecutions.Massacres of prisoners of war, and their families. [71]

Asia and the Pacific War

Allied soldiers in the Pacific and Asian theatres sometimes killed Japanese soldiers who were attempting to surrender or after they had surrendered. A social historian of the Pacific War, John W. Dower, states that "by the final years of the war against Japan, a truly vicious cycle had developed in which the Japanese reluctance to surrender had meshed horrifically with Allied disinterest in taking prisoners". [72] Dower suggests that most Japanese personnel were told that they would be "killed or tortured" if they fell into Allied hands and, as a consequence, most of those faced with defeat on the battlefield fought to the death or committed suicide. [73] In addition, it was held to be shamefully disgraceful for a Japanese soldier to surrender, leading many to commit suicide or to fight to the death regardless of any beliefs concerning their possible treatment as POWs. In fact, the Japanese Field Service Code said that surrender was not permissible. [74]

And while it was "not official policy" for Allied personnel to take no prisoners, "over wide reaches of the Asian battleground it was everyday practice". [75]

On 4 March 1943, during the Battle of the Bismarck Sea, General George Kenney ordered Allied patrol boats and aircraft to attack Japanese rescue vessels, as well as the survivors from the sunken vessels on life rafts and swimming or floating in the sea. This was later justified on the grounds that rescued servicemen would have been rapidly landed at their military destination and promptly returned to active service. [76] These orders violated the Hague Convention of 1907, which banned the killing of shipwreck survivors under any circumstances. [77]


According to historian Mark Johnston, "the killing of unarmed Japanese was common" and Australian command tried to put pressure on troops to actually take prisoners, but the troops proved reluctant. [78] When prisoners were indeed taken "it often proved difficult to prevent them from killing captured Japanese before they could be interrogated". [79] According to Johnston, as a consequence of this type of behavior, "Some Japanese soldiers were almost certainly deterred from surrendering to Australians". [79]

Major General Paul Cullen indicated that the killing of Japanese prisoners in the Kokoda Track Campaign was not uncommon. In one instance he recalled during the battle at Gorari that "the leading platoon captured five or seven Japanese and moved on to the next battle. The next platoon came along and bayoneted these Japanese." [80] He also stated that he found the killings understandable but that it had left him feeling guilty.


There has been relatively little research into the general treatment of Japanese prisoners taken by Chinese Nationalist forces, such as the National Revolutionary Army (NRA), during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–45), according to R. J. Rummel. [81] However, civilians and conscripts, as well as Japanese civilians in China, were frequently maltreated by the Chinese military. Rummel says that Chinese peasants "often had no less to fear from their own soldiers than ... from the Japanese". [82] The Nationalist military was reinforced by recruits gained through violent campaigns of conscription directed at Chinese civilians. According to Rummel:

This was a deadly affair in which men were kidnapped for the army, rounded up indiscriminately by press-gangs or army units among those on the roads or in the towns and villages, or otherwise gathered together. Many men, some the very young and old, were killed resisting or trying to escape. Once collected, they would be roped or chained together and marched, with little food or water, long distances to camp. They often died or were killed along the way, sometimes less than 50 percent reaching camp alive. Then recruit camp was no better, with hospitals resembling Nazi concentration camps... Probably 3,081,000 died during the Sino-Japanese War; likely another 1,131,000 during the Civil War—4,212,000 dead in total. Just during conscription [emphasis added]. [83]

Within some intakes of Nationalist conscripts, there was a death rate of 90% from disease, starvation or violence before they commenced training. [84]

Examples of war crimes committed by Chinese associated forces include:

United Kingdom

During the Burma Campaign, there are recorded instances of British troops removing gold teeth from dead Japanese troops and displaying Japanese skulls as trophies. [87]

During the Allied occupation of Japan, Australian, British, Indian and New Zealand troops in Japan as part of the British Commonwealth Occupation Force (BCOF) committed 62 recorded rapes. The commander of the BCOF's official reports state that members of the BCOF were convicted of committing 57 rapes in the period May 1946 to December 1947 and a further 23 between January 1948 and September 1951. No official statistics on the incidence of serious crimes during the BCOF's first three months in Japan (February to April 1946) are available. [88] Australian historian Robin Gerster contends that while the official statistics underestimate the level of serious crime among BCOF members, Japanese police often did not pass reports they received on to the BCOF and that the serious crimes which were reported were properly investigated by BCOF military police. The penalties given to members of the BCOF convicted of serious crimes were "not severe", however, and those imposed on Australians were often mitigated or quashed by Australian courts. [89]

United States

American soldiers in the Pacific often deliberately killed Japanese soldiers who had surrendered. According to Richard Aldrich, who has published a study of the diaries kept by United States and Australian soldiers, they sometimes massacred prisoners of war. [90] Dower states that in "many instances ... Japanese who did become prisoners were killed on the spot or en route to prison compounds". [75] According to Aldrich it was common practice for U.S. troops not to take prisoners. [91] This analysis is supported by British historian Niall Ferguson, [92] who also says that, in 1943, "a secret [U.S.] intelligence report noted that only the promise of ice cream and three days leave would ... induce American troops not to kill surrendering Japanese". [92]

Ferguson states such practices played a role in the ratio of Japanese prisoners to dead being 1:100 in late 1944. That same year, efforts were taken by Allied high commanders to suppress "take no prisoners" attitudes, [92] among their own personnel (as these were affecting intelligence gathering) and to encourage Japanese soldiers to surrender. Ferguson adds that measures by Allied commanders to improve the ratio of Japanese prisoners to Japanese dead, resulted in it reaching 1:7, by mid-1945. Nevertheless, taking no prisoners was still standard practice among US troops at the Battle of Okinawa, in April–June 1945. [92]

Ulrich Straus, a US Japanologist, suggests that frontline troops intensely hated Japanese military personnel and were "not easily persuaded" to take or protect prisoners, as they believed that Allied personnel who surrendered, got "no mercy" from the Japanese. [93] Allied soldiers believed that Japanese soldiers were inclined to feign surrender in order to make surprise attacks. [93] Therefore, according to Straus, "Senior officers opposed the taking of prisoners on the grounds that it needlessly exposed American troops to risks". [93] When prisoners nevertheless were taken at Guadalcanal, interrogator Army Captain Burden noted that many times these were shot during transport because "it was too much bother to take him in". [94]

Ferguson suggests that

it was not only the fear of disciplinary action or of dishonor that deterred German and Japanese soldiers from surrendering. More important for most soldiers was the perception that prisoners would be killed by the enemy anyway, and so one might as well fight on. [92]

US historian James J. Weingartner attributes the very low number of Japanese in US POW compounds to two important factors, a Japanese reluctance to surrender and a widespread American "conviction that the Japanese were "animals" or "subhuman" and unworthy of the normal treatment accorded to POWs. [95] The latter reason is supported by Ferguson, who says that "Allied troops often saw the Japanese in the same way that Germans regarded Russians—as Untermenschen". [92]

Mutilation of Japanese war dead

U.S. Navy Lieutenant (j.g.) E.V. McPherson with a Japanese skull on board USS PT-341 AWM 072837.jpg
U.S. Navy Lieutenant (j.g.) E.V. McPherson with a Japanese skull on board USS PT-341

Some Allied soldiers collected Japanese body parts. The incidence of this by American personnel occurred on "a scale large enough to concern the Allied military authorities throughout the conflict and was widely reported and commented on in the American and Japanese wartime press". [96]

The collection of Japanese body parts began quite early in the war, prompting a September 1942 order for disciplinary action against such souvenir taking. [96] Harrison concludes that, since this was the first real opportunity to take such items (the Battle of Guadalcanal), "[c]learly, the collection of body parts on a scale large enough to concern the military authorities had started as soon as the first living or dead Japanese bodies were encountered". [96]

When Japanese remains were repatriated from the Mariana Islands after the war, roughly 60 percent were missing their skulls. [96]

In a 13 June 1944 memorandum, the US Army Judge Advocate General, (JAG) Major General Myron C. Cramer, asserted that "such atrocious and brutal policies", were both "repugnant to the sensibilities of all civilized people" [95] and also violations of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armies in the Field, which stated that: "After each engagement, the occupant of the field of battle shall take measures to search for the wounded and dead, and to protect them against pillage and maltreatment." [97] Cramer recommended the distribution to all commanders of a directive ordering them to prohibit the misuse of enemy body parts. [95]

These practices were in addition also in violation of the unwritten customary rules of land warfare and could lead to the death penalty. [95] The US Navy JAG mirrored that opinion one week later, and also added that "the atrocious conduct of which some US personnel were guilty could lead to retaliation by the Japanese which would be justified under international law". [95]



US soldiers raped Okinawan women during the Battle of Okinawa in 1945. [98]

Okinawan historian and former director of the Okinawa Prefectural Historical Archives Oshiro Masayasu writes based on several years of research:

Soon after the US Marines landed, all the women of a village on Motobu Peninsula fell into the hands of US soldiers. At the time, there were only women, children and old people in the village, as all the young men had been mobilized for the war. Soon after landing, the Marines "mopped up" the entire village, but found no signs of Japanese forces. Taking advantage of the situation, they started "hunting for women" in broad daylight and those who were hiding in the village or nearby air raid shelters were dragged out one after another. [99]

According to interviews carried out by The New York Times and published by them in 2000, multiple elderly people from an Okinawan village confessed that after the United States had won the Battle of Okinawa three armed marines kept coming to the village every week to force the villagers to gather all the local women, who were then carried off into the hills and raped. The article goes deeper into the matter and claims that the villagers' tale - true or not - is part of a 'dark, long-kept secret' the unraveling of which 'refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war': "the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen". [100] Although Japanese reports of rape were largely ignored at the time, academic estimates have been that as many as 10,000 Okinawan women may have been raped. It has been claimed that the rape was so prevalent that most Okinawans over age 65 around the year 2000 either knew or had heard of a woman who was raped in the aftermath of the war. Military officials denied the mass rapings, and all surviving veterans refused The New York Times' request for an interview. [101]

Professor of East Asian Studies and expert on Okinawa Steve Rabson said: "I have read many accounts of such rapes in Okinawan newspapers and books, but few people know about them or are willing to talk about them". Books, diaries, articles and other documents refer to rapes by American soldiers of various races and backgrounds. Samuel Saxton, a retired captain, explained that the American veterans and witnesses may have believed: "It would be unfair for the public to get the impression that we were all a bunch of rapists after we worked so hard to serve our country". Masaie Ishihara, a sociology professor, supports this: "There is a lot of historical amnesia out there, many people don't want to acknowledge what really happened". [101]

An explanation given for why the US military has no record of any rapes is that few - if any - Okinawan women reported abuse, mostly out of fear and embarrassment. Those who did report them are believed by historians to have been ignored by the US military police. A large scale effort to determine the extent of such crimes has also never been called for. Over five decades after the war has ended the women who were believed to have been raped still refused to give a public statement, with friends, local historians and university professors who had spoken with the women instead saying they preferred not to discuss it publicly. According to a Nago, Okinawan police spokesman: "Victimized women feel too ashamed to make it public". [101]

In his book "Tennozan: The Battle of Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb", George Feifer noted that by 1946 there had been fewer than 10 reported cases of rape in Okinawa. He explains that it was: "partly because of shame and disgrace, partly because Americans were victors and occupiers". Feifer claimed: "In all there were probably thousands of incidents, but the victims' silence kept rape another dirty secret of the campaign." [102] Many people wondered why it never came to light after the inevitable American-Japanese babies the many women must have had. In interviews, historians and Okinawan elders said that some Okinawan women who were raped did give birth to biracial children, but that many of them were immediately killed or left behind out of shame, disgust or fearful trauma. More often, however, rape victims underwent crude abortions with the help of village midwives. [101]

However, American professor of Japanese Studies Michael S. Molasky argues that Okinawan civilians "were often surprised at the comparatively humane treatment they received from the American enemy." [103] [104] According to Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power by the American Mark Selden, the Americans "did not pursue a policy of torture, rape, and murder of civilians as Japanese military officials had warned." [105]


There were 1,336 reported rapes during the first 10 days of the occupation of Kanagawa Prefecture after the Japanese surrender. [98]

Comparative death rates of POWs

According to James D. Morrow, "Death rates of POWs held is one measure of adherence to the standards of the treaties because substandard treatment leads to death of prisoners". The "democratic states generally provide good treatment of POWs". [106]

Held and killed by the Allied powers

Held and killed by Axis powers

Novelist James Bacque claims an analysis of records supports a death rate of over 25% among German soldiers who fell into Allied hands at the end of the war,. [113] These soldiers were classified by the Allies as Disarmed Enemy Forces in order that they not be covered by the Geneva Convention. Bacque's figures have been disputed by academics,[ who? ] who describe Bacque's figures as "simply impossible". [114] A panel of historians concluded that Bacque is a Canadian novelist with no previous historical research or writing experience, [115] and his writing is "seriously — nay, spectacularly — flawed in its most fundamental aspects." [116]

Summary table

Percent killed
Soviet UnionUnited States
and United Kingdom
China Western Allies Germany Japan
Held bySoviet Union14.70
United Kingdom0.03
United States0.15varying
East European 32.90
Germany 57.504.00
Japan included in Western Allies (27)not documented27.00


Holocaust denial literature

The focus on supposed Allied atrocities during the war has been a theme of Holocaust denial literature, particularly in countries where outright denial of the Holocaust is illegal. [117] According to historian Deborah Lipstadt, the concept of "comparable Allied wrongs", such as the post-war expulsions and Allied war crimes, is at the center of, and a continuously repeated theme of, contemporary Holocaust denial; phenomenon she calls "immoral equivalencies". [118]

Japanese neo-nationalists

Japanese neo-nationalists argue that Allied war crimes and the shortcomings of the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal were equivalent to the war crimes committed by Japanese forces during the war.[ citation needed ] American historian John W. Dower has written that this position is "a kind of historiographic cancellation of immorality—as if the transgressions of others exonerate one's own crimes". [119] While right-wing forces in Japan have tried to push for their perspective on war-time history, they have been unsuccessful due to opposition both within and outside Japan. [120]

See also


  1. The caption for the photograph in the US National Archives reads, "SC208765, Soldiers of the 42nd Infantry Division, US Seventh Army, order SS men to come forward when one of their number tried to escape from the Dachau, Germany, concentration camp after it was captured by US forces. Men on the ground in background feign death by falling as the guards fired a volley at the fleeing SS men. (157th Regt. 4/29/45)." (Moody 2003)
    Lt. Colonel Felix L. Sparks disputed this and thought that it "represented the initial step in the cover-up of the execution of German guards". (Moody 2003)


  1. Davies, Norman (2005). "War crimes". The Oxford Companion to World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 983–984. ISBN   978-0-19-280670-3.
  2. Antony Beevor (1 May 2002), "'They raped every German female from eight to 80'",, The Guardian
  3. Kershaw, Alex, "Monte Cassino, Ten Armies in Hell", World War II Magazine, September/October 2013, p. 73
  4. Harding, Luke (22 October 2003). "Germany's forgotten victims". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  5. Bloxham, David "Dresden as a War Crime", in Addison, Paul & Crang, Jeremy A. (eds.). Firestorm: The Bombing of Dresden. Pimlico, 2006. ISBN   1-84413-928-X. Chapter 9 p. 180
  6. Davies, Norman (2005). "War crimes". The Oxford Companion to World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 983–984. ISBN   978-0-19-280670-3.
  7. Javier Guisández Gómez (30 June 1998). "The Law of Air Warfare". International Review of the Red Cross (323): 347–363. Archived from the original on 25 April 2013.
  8. Terror from the Sky: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II. Berghahn Books. 2010. p. 167. ISBN   1-8454-5844-3.
  9. Stacey (1960), p. 558
  10. Stacey (1982), pp. 163–164
  11. Stacey (1960), pp. 558
  12. Beevor, Antony, D-Day, Viking, 2009 p 447
  13. After the Battle Magazine, Issue 143
  14. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 15 July 2013. Retrieved 11 December 2008.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) Italian women win cash for wartime rapes
  15. Volker Koop: Besetzt: französische Besatzungspolitik in Deutschland, Berlin 2005
  16. "1952: Il caso delle "marocchinate" al Parlamento". Archived from the original on 6 January 2009. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
  17. Innes McCartney (15 July 2013). British Submarines 1939-45. Osprey Publishing. p. 21. ISBN   1-8460-3007-2.
  18. Nachman Ben-Yehuda (15 July 2013). Atrocity, Deviance, and Submarine Warfare: Norms and Practices during the World Wars. University of Michigan Press. p. 133. ISBN   0-4721-1889-7.
  19. HMS Torbay (N79) Archived 23 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  20. Michael L. Hadley (17 March 1995). Count Not the Dead: The Popular Image of the German Submarine. McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 135. ISBN   0-7735-1282-9.
  21. Flint, p. 354
  22. Kershaw, Robert (1990). It Never Snows In September. Ian Allan Publishing. ISBN   0-7110-2167-8.
  23. Castle looted by British troops AAP, 23 August 1947
  24. Cobain, Ian (12 November 2005). "The secrets of the London Cage". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 July 2009.
  25. Lt Col R.G.W. Stephens (2000). Oliver Hoare (ed.). Camp 020: MI5 and the Nazi Spies. Public Records Office. p. 7. ISBN   1-903365-08-2.
  26. Emsley, Clive (2013) Soldier, Sailor, Beggarman, Thief: Crime and the British Armed Services since 1914. Oxford University Press, USA, p. 128-129; ISBN   0199653712
  27. 1 2 3 4 Longden, Sean (2004) To the victor the spoils: D-Day to VE Day, the reality behind the heroism. Arris Books, p. 195. ISBN   1844370380
  28. Giovanni Bartolone, Le altre stragi: Le stragi alleate e tedesche nella Sicilia del 1943–1944
  29. George Duncan, Massacres and Atrocities of World War II in the Axis Countries Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  30. Weingartner, James J. A Peculiar Crusadee: Willis M. Everett and the Malmedy massacre, NYU Press, 2000, p. 118. ISBN   0-8147-9366-5
  31. Weingartner, James J. (1989). "Massacre at Biscari: Patton and an American War Crime". The Historian. 52: 24–39. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.1989.tb00772.x.
  32. "The Horror of D-Day: A New Openness to Discussing Allied War Crimes in WWII", Der Spiegel, May 4, 2010, (part 1), accessed 8 July 2010
  33. Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.186
  34. Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.189
  35. Bradley A. Thayer, Darwin and international relations p.190
  36. Harland-Dunaway, Chris (28 July 2018), "Take no prisoners: Inside a WWII American war crime",, Center for Investigative Reporting
  37. Zigan, Harald (16 April 2015). "Kriegsende 1945 (Teil 10): US-Soldaten nehmen blutige Rache in Jungholzhausen und Ilshofen". (in German). Südwest Presse . Retrieved 3 March 2019.
  38. Falkner, Burkhard (2 October 2010). "Es geht nicht um Rache, wir mahnen". (in German). Volksstimme . Retrieved 6 March 2019.
  39. Fritz, Stephen G. (2004). Endkampf: Soldiers, Civilians, and the Death of the Third Reich. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington. pp. 180–182. ISBN   0-8131-2325-9.
  40. Albert Panebianco (ed). Dachau its liberation Archived 28 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine 57th Infantry Association, Felix L. Sparks, Secretary 15 June 1989. (backup site)
  41. Sparks, Felix L. "Dachau And It's Liberation" . Retrieved 23 December 2013.
  42. Perez, R.H. (2002). "Dachau Concentration Camp - Liberation". Archived from the original on 10 October 2013. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
  43. Buechner, Howard (1986). Dachau: The Hour of the Avenger. New York: Thunderbird Press. p. 97. ISBN   0913159042.
  44. Lundeberg, Philip K. (1994). "Operation Teardrop Revisited". In Runyan, Timothy J.; Copes, Jan M (eds.). To Die Gallantly : The Battle of the Atlantic. Boulder: Westview Press. pp. 221–6. ISBN   0-8133-8815-5.
  45. Blair, Clay (1998). Hitler's U-Boat War. The Hunted, 1942–1945. Modern Library. New York: Random House. p. 687. ISBN   0-679-64033-9.
  46. David Wilson (27 March 2007). "The secret war". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 22 November 2008.
  47. Lilly, Robert J. (2007). Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe During World War II. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   0-230-50647-X.
  48. Morrow, John H. (October 2008). "Taken by Force: Rape and American GIs in Europe during World War II By J. Robert Lilly". The Journal of Military History . 72 (4): 1324. doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0151.
  49. Schofield, Hugh (5 June 2009). "Revisionists challenge D-Day story". BBC News. Retrieved 6 January 2010.
  50. Study: Soviet Prisoners-of-War (POWs), 1941–42 [ unreliable source? ] website of Gendercide Watch
  51. Matthew White, Source List and Detailed Death Tolls for the Twentieth Century Hemoclysm: Stalin
  52. POWs and the laws of war: World War II legacy 2003 Educational Broadcasting Corporation
  53. Jennifer K. Elsea (Legislative Attorney American Law Division) Federation of American Scientists CRS Report for Congress Lawfulness of Interrogation Techniques under the Geneva Conventions (PDF) 8 September 2004. Page 24 first paragraph see also footnotes 93 and 87
  54. German High Command Trial 30 December 1947 – 28 October 1948, PartVIII Archived 2 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  55. James, Mark (2005). "Remembering Rape: Divided Social Memory and the Red Army in Hungary 1944–1945". Past & Present. 188 (1): 133–161. doi:10.1093/pastj/gti020.
  56. Hitchcock, William I. (2003). "German Midnight: The Division of Europe, 1945". The Struggle for Europe: The Turbulent History of a Divided Continent 1945–2002. ISBN   0-385-49798-9 . Retrieved 18 March 2006.
  57. De Zayas, Alfred-Maurice (1994). A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944–1950. ISBN   0-312-12159-8.
  58. Walter, Elizabeth B. (1997). Barefoot in the Rubble. ISBN   0-9657793-0-0.
  59. Beevor, Antony (1 May 2002). "'They raped every German female from eight to 80'". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 9 July 2010.
  60. Milovan Djilas, Conversations with Stalin, p. 95.
  61. Beevor, Antony (1 May 2002). "They raped every German female from eight to 80". The Guardian. London.
  62. M. Itoh (12 April 2010). Japanese War Orphans in Manchuria: Forgotten Victims of World War II. Palgrave Macmillan US. pp. 34–. ISBN   978-0-230-10636-9.
  63. Yalta and the Bleiburg Tragedy Archived 16 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  64. A Tragedy Revealed by Door Arrigo Petacco, Konrad Eisenbichler
  65. Slovene-Italian Relations 1880-1956 Report 2000
  66. Janjetović, Zoran (2006). "Proterivanje nemačkog i mađarskog življa iz Vojvodine na kraju drugog svetskog rata". Hereticus (in Serbian). 1. Archived from the original on 6 October 2011. Retrieved 6 May 2011.
  67. Slovenia 1945: Memories of Death and Survival after World War II by John Corsellis & Marcus Ferrar. Pages 87, 204 & 250.
  68. "Macelj - gora zločina!". Večernji list (in Croatian). 16 May 2012. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
  69. "Tezno je najveća masovna grobnica Hrvata". Jutarnji list (in Croatian). 11 September 2007. Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 2010-05-15.
  70. "Stratišta: "U iskapanju Hude jame Hrvati nam moraju pomoći, tamo su oni ubijali svoje"". Slobodna Dalmacija (in Croatian). 7 November 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
  71. Mass grave of 700 people found in Slovenia, The Daily Telegraph
  72. John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (Pantheon: New York. ISBN   0-394-75172-8), p.35.
  73. John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy, p.68.
  74. Ulrich Strauss, 2003, The Anguish of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II[ page needed ]
  75. 1 2 John W. Dower, 1986, War Without Mercy, p.69.
  76. "Anniversary talks—Battle of the Bismarck Sea, 2–4 March 1943". Australian War Memorial. 3 March 2003. Archived from the original on 24 August 2003. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
  77. Convention For The Adaptation To Maritime War Of The Principles Of The Geneva Convention, Article 16[ non-primary source needed ]
  78. Mark Johnston, Fighting the enemy: Australian soldiers and their adversaries in World War II pp. 80–81
  79. 1 2 Mark Johnston, Fighting the enemy: Australian soldiers and their adversaries in World War II p. 81
  80. Kevin Baker, Paul Cullen, citizen and soldier: the life and times of Major-General Paul Cullen AC, CBE, DSC and Bar, ED, FCA p. 146
  81. 1 2 Rummel 1991, p. 112
  82. 1 2 Rummel 1991, p. 113
  84. Rudolph J. Rummel, 1991, China's Bloody Century: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900 ( ISBN   0-88738-417-X) Transaction Publishers, p. 115.
  85. Tom Mintier, "Photos document brutality in Shanghai" CNN, 23 September 1996. Retrieved: 25 August 2007.
  86. 中村粲 『大東亜戦争への道』展々社,1990年
  87. T. R. Moreman "The jungle, the Japanese and the British Commonwealth armies at war, 1941-45", p. 205
  88. Gerster 2008, pp. 112–3.
  89. Gerster 2008, p. [ page needed ].
  90. Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily Telegraph (UK), June 8, 2005), accessed 26/05/2007. (Adrich is a professor of history at the University of Nottingham.)
  91. Ben Fenton, "American troops 'murdered Japanese PoWs'" (Daily Telegraph (UK), June 8, 2005), accessed 26/05/2007
  92. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ferguson, Niall (2004). "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards a Political Economy of Military Defeat". War in History. 11 (2): 148–92. doi:10.1191/0968344504wh291oa.
  93. 1 2 3 Ulrich Straus, The Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II (excerpts) Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003 ISBN   978-0-295-98336-3, p.116
  94. Ulrich Straus, The Anguish Of Surrender: Japanese POWs of World War II (excerpts) Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003 ISBN   978-0-295-98336-3, p. 117
  95. 1 2 3 4 5 Weingartner, J. J. (1992). "Trophies of War: US Troops and the Mutilation of Japanese War Dead, 1941–1945". Pacific Historical Review. 61 (1): 53–67. JSTOR   3640788.
  96. 1 2 3 4 Harrison, Simon (2006). "Skull trophies of the Pacific War: Transgressive objects of remembrance". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 12 (4): 817–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00365.x.
  97. Cited in Weingartner, 1992.
  98. 1 2 Schrijvers, Peter (2002). The GI War Against Japan. New York City: New York University Press. p. 212. ISBN   0-8147-9816-0.
  99. Tanaka, Toshiyuki. Japan's Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution During World War II, Routledge, 2003, p.111. ISBN   0-203-30275-3
  100. Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of Wartime Okinawa". The New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015. Still, the villagers' tale of a dark, long-kept secret has refocused attention on what historians say is one of the most widely ignored crimes of the war, the widespread rape of Okinawan women by American servicemen.
  101. 1 2 3 4 Sims, Calvin (1 June 2000). "3 Dead Marines and a Secret of Wartime Okinawa". The New York Times. Nago, Japan. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  102. Feifer, George (1992). Tennozan: The Battle of Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb. Michigan: Ticknor & Fields. ISBN   9780395599242.
  103. Molasky, Michael S. (1999). The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa: Literature and Memory. p. 16. ISBN   978-0-415-19194-4.
  104. Molasky, Michael S.; Rabson, Steve (2000). Southern Exposure: Modern Japanese Literature from Okinawa. p. 22. ISBN   978-0-8248-2300-9.
  105. Sheehan, Susan D; Elizabeth, Laura; Selden, Hein Mark. "Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power": 18.Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  106. 1 2 James D. Morrow. The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties , Center for Political Studies at The University of Michigan
  107. Only 10032 repatriated POW on approx 48000 arrived in the POW camps. Another 22000 died during the marches to the camps, Thomas Schlemmer, Invasori, non vittime - La campagna italiana di Russia 1941-1943, Bari, Laterza, 2009, ISBN   978-88-420-7981-1, page 153
  108. James D. Morrow The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties , Center for Political Studies at The University of Michigan, p. 22
  109. About 43600 deaths on a total of approx 730000 POWs and military internees. Another 13269 were killed between september 1943 and february 1944 in the sinking of seven ships carrying them from Greece to German-controlled ports. A further 5000 to 6000 italian POW were murdered by the Germans after they had surrendered in the Massacre of the Acqui Division.
  110. Yuki Tanaka, 1996,Hidden Horrors (Westview Press) ( ISBN   0-8133-2718-0) pp. 2–3.
  111. Gavan Daws, "Prisoners of the Japanese: POWs of World War II in the Pacific", p.297
  112. "Donald L. Miller "D-Days in the Pacific", p317"
  113. James Bacque, Other Losses revised edition 1999, Little Brown and Company, Boston, New York, Toronto, London ISBN   1-55168-191-9
  114. Power Kills Chapter 13. Available on line at:
  115. Bischoff & Ambrose 1992 , p. 20
  116. Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 21
  117. Stephen E. Atkins, "Holocaust denial as an international movement", ABC-CLIO, 2009, pg. 105
  118. Debrah Lipstadt, "Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory", Bt Bound, 1999, pg. 41
  119. Dower, John W (2002). ""An Aptitude for Being Unloved: War and Memory in Japan". In Bartov, Omer; et al. (eds.). Crimes of War: Guilt and Denial in the Twentieth Century. New York: The New Press. p. 226. ISBN   1-56584-654-0.
  120. Sharalyn Orbaugh, "Japanese fiction of the Allied occupation" p.179

Related Research Articles

Battle of Okinawa Major battle of the Pacific War

The Battle of Okinawa, codenamed Operation Iceberg, was a major battle of the Pacific War fought on the island of Okinawa by United States Marine and Army forces against the Imperial Japanese Army. The initial invasion of Okinawa on April 1, 1945, was the largest amphibious assault in the Pacific Theater of World War II. The 82-day battle lasted from April 1 until June 22, 1945. After a long campaign of island hopping, the Allies were planning to use Kadena Air Base on the large island of Okinawa as a base for Operation Downfall, the planned invasion of the Japanese home islands, 340 mi (550 km) away.

Prisoner of war Person who is held in custody by a belligerent power during or immediately after an armed conflict

A prisoner of war (POW) is a non-combatant—whether a military member, an irregular military fighter, or a civilian—who is held captive by a belligerent power during or immediately after an armed conflict. The earliest recorded usage of the phrase "prisoner of war" dates back to 1610.

Occupation of Japan Allied occupation of Japan following WWII

The Allied occupation of Japan at the end of World War II was led by General Douglas MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, with support from the British Commonwealth. Unlike in the occupation of Germany, the Soviet Union was allowed little to no influence over Japan. This foreign presence marks the only time in Japan's history that it has been occupied by a foreign power. At MacArthur's insistence, Emperor Hirohito remained on the imperial throne. The wartime cabinet was replaced with a cabinet acceptable to the Allies and committed to implementing the terms of the Potsdam Declaration, which among other things called for the country to become a parliamentary democracy. Under MacArthur's guidance, the Japanese government introduced sweeping social reforms and implemented economic reforms that recalled American "New Deal" priorities of the 1930s under President Roosevelt. The Japanese constitution was comprehensively overhauled and the Emperor's theoretically-vast powers, which for many centuries had been constrained by conventions that had evolved over time, became strictly limited by law. The occupation, codenamed Operation Blacklist, was ended by the San Francisco Peace Treaty, signed on September 8, 1951, and effective from April 28, 1952, after which Japan's sovereignty – with the exception, until 1972, of the Ryukyu Islands – was fully restored.

Nazism and the acts of the Nazi German state profoundly affected many countries, communities, and people before, during and after World War II. The regime's attempt to exterminate several groups viewed as subhuman by Nazi ideology was eventually stopped by the combined efforts of the wartime Allies headed by Britain, the Soviet Union, and the United States.

Disarmed Enemy Forces was a US designation for soldiers who surrendered to an adversary after hostilities ended, and for those POWs who had already surrendered and were held in camps in occupied German territory at the time. It was Dwight D. Eisenhower's designation of German prisoners in post-World War II occupied Germany.

War crimes were committed by the Empire of Japan in many Asia-Pacific countries during the period of Japanese imperialism, primarily during the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II. These incidents have been described as an "Asian Holocaust". Some war crimes were committed by Japanese military personnel during the late 19th century, but most Japanese war crimes were committed during the first part of the Shōwa Era, the name given to the reign of Emperor Hirohito, until the surrender of the Empire of Japan in 1945.

Bangka Island massacre

The Bangka Island massacre was committed during World War II in the Pacific, on Bangka Island, east of Sumatra in the Indonesian archipelago. On 16 February 1942, Imperial Japanese soldiers machine-gunned 22 Australian Army nurses and 60 Australian and British soldiers and crew members who had survived the sinking of Vyner Brooke by Japanese bombers. South Australian nurse, Sister Lt Vivian Bullwinkel, was the sole surviving nurse; two soldiers also survived.

Manila massacre atrocities committed against Filipino civilians by Japanese troops at the Battle of Manila

The Manila massacre, also called as the Rape of Manila, involved atrocities committed against Filipino civilians in the City of Manila, the capital of the Philippines, by Japanese troops during World War II at the Battle of Manila. The combined death toll of civilians for the battle of Manila was about 100,000.

War crimes of the Wehrmacht crimes carried out by the German armed forces during World War II

During World War II, the Germans' combined armed forces committed systematic war crimes, including massacres, mass rape, looting, the exploitation of forced labor, the murder of three million Soviet prisoners of war, and participated in the extermination of Jews. While the Nazi Party's own SS forces of Nazi Germany was the organization most responsible for the genocidal killing of the Holocaust, the regular armed forces represented by the Wehrmacht committed war crimes of their own, particularly on the Eastern Front in the war against the Soviet Union.

Soviet war crimes

War crimes perpetrated by the Soviet Union and its armed forces from 1919 to 1991 include acts committed by the Red Army as well as the NKVD, including the NKVD's Internal Troops. In some cases, these acts were committed upon the orders of the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin in pursuance of the early Soviet Government's policy of Red Terror. In other instances they were committed without orders by Soviet troops against prisoners of war or civilians of countries that had been in armed conflict with the USSR, or they were committed during partisan warfare.

The Chenogne massacre was a war crime committed by members of the 11th Armored Division, an American combat unit, near Chenogne, Belgium, on January 1, 1945, during the Battle of the Bulge.

German war crimes

The governments of the German Empire and Nazi Germany ordered, organized and condoned a substantial number of war crimes, first in the Herero and Namaqua genocide and then in World War I and World War II. The most notable of these is the Holocaust in which millions of Jews and Romani were systematically murdered. Millions of civilians and prisoners of war also died as a result of German abuse, mistreatment, and deliberate starvation policies in those two conflicts. Much of the evidence was deliberately destroyed by the perpetrators, such as in Sonderaktion 1005, in an attempt to conceal the crimes.

Wartime sexual violence type of war crime and atrocity

Wartime sexual violence is rape or other forms of sexual violence committed by combatants during armed conflict, war, or military occupation often as spoils of war; but sometimes, particularly in ethnic conflict, the phenomenon has broader sociological motives. Wartime sexual violence may also include gang rape and rape with objects. It is distinguished from sexual harassment, sexual assaults, and rape committed amongst troops in military service. It also covers the situation where girls, boys and women are forced into prostitution or sexual slavery by an occupying power.

United States war crimes are the violations of the laws and customs of war of which the United States Armed Forces are accused of committing after the signing of the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. These have included the summary execution of captured enemy combatants, the mistreatment of prisoners during interrogation, the use of torture, and the use of violence against civilians and non-combatants.

German prisoners of war in the Soviet Union

Approximately three million German prisoners of war were captured by the Soviet Union during World War II, most of them during the great advances of the Red Army in the last year of the war. The POWs were employed as forced labor in the Soviet wartime economy and post-war reconstruction. By 1950 almost all surviving POWs had been released, with the last prisoner returning from the USSR in 1956. According to Soviet records 381,067 German Wehrmacht POWs died in NKVD camps. German historian Rüdiger Overmans maintains that it seems entirely plausible, while not provable, that one million died in Soviet custody. He also believes that there were men who actually died as POWs amongst those listed as missing-in-action (MIA).

Rapes during the occupation of Japan were war rapes or rapes committed under the Allied military occupation of Japan. Allied troops committed a number of rapes during the Battle of Okinawa during the last months of the Pacific War and the subsequent occupation of Japan. The Allies occupied Japan until 1952 following the end of World War II and Okinawa Prefecture remained under US governance for two decades after. Estimates of the incidence of sexual violence by Allied occupation personnel differ considerably.

Japanese prisoners of war in World War II

During World War II, it has been estimated that between 19,500 and 50,000 members of the Imperial Japanese military surrendered to Western Allied combatants prior to the end of the Pacific War in August 1945. Soviet troops seized and imprisoned more than half a million Japanese troops and civilians in China and other places. The number of Japanese soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen who surrendered was limited by the Japanese military indoctrinating its personnel to fight to the death, Allied combat personnel often being unwilling to take prisoners, and many Japanese soldiers believing that those who surrendered would be killed by their captors.

Rape during the occupation of Germany

As Allied troops entered and occupied German territory during the later stages of World War II, mass rapes of women took place both in connection with combat operations and during the subsequent occupation. Most Western scholars agree that the majority of the rapes were committed by Soviet servicemen, while some Russian historians maintain that these crimes were not widespread. The wartime rapes had been surrounded by decades of silence. According to Antony Beevor, whose books were banned in 2015 from some Russian schools and colleges, NKVD files have revealed that the leadership knew what was happening, but did little to stop it. Some Russian historians disagree, claiming that the Soviet leadership took some action.

Imperial Japanese Army during the Pacific War

At the beginning of the Pacific War in 1941, the Imperial Japanese Army contained 51 divisions, most of which were stationed in China. A further 13 divisions defended the Manchurian-Soviet border, due to concerns about a possible attack by the Soviet Union. From 1942, troops were sent to Hong Kong, the Philippines, Thailand, Burma, Dutch East Indies, and Malaya. By 1945, there were 5.5 million men in the Imperial Japanese Army.


Further reading