Dakota War of 1862

Last updated

Dakota War of 1862
Part of the Sioux Wars and the American Civil War
1904paintingAttackNewUlmAntonGag.jpg
1904 painting "Attack on New Ulm" by Anton Gag
DateAugust 18, 1862 – September 26, 1862
Location
Result United States victory
Belligerents
Flag of the United States (1861-1863).svg  United States Dakota
Commanders and leaders
Flag of the United States (1861-1863).svg Alexander Ramsey
Flag of the United States (1861-1863).svg Henry Hastings Sibley
Flag of the United States (1861-1863).svg John Pope
Little Crow
Shakopee   Skull and Crossbones.svg
Red Middle Voice
Mankato  
Big Eagle   White flag icon.svg
Cut Nose   Skull and Crossbones.svg
Casualties and losses
77 USV, and 29 volunteers killed
358 civilians killed [1] [2]
150 dead, 38 executed [3] +2 executed November 11, 1865

The Dakota War of 1862, also known as the Sioux Uprising, the Dakota Uprising, the Sioux Outbreak of 1862, the Dakota Conflict, the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862, or Little Crow's War, was an armed conflict between the United States and several bands of eastern Dakota also known as the Santee Sioux. It began on August 18, 1862, at the Lower Sioux Agency along the Minnesota River in southwest Minnesota. [4]

Contents

The eastern Dakota were pressured into ceding large tracts of land to the United States in a series of treaties signed in 1837, 1851 and 1858, in exchange for cash annuities, debt payments, and other provisions. [5] [6] :2 All four bands of eastern Dakota, particularly the Mdewakanton, were displaced and reluctantly moved to a reservation that was twenty miles wide, ten on both sides of the Minnesota River. [6] :2–3 There, they were encouraged by U.S. Indian agents to become farmers rather than continue their hunting traditions. [6] :4–5 Meanwhile, the settler population in Minnesota Territory had grown from 6,077 in 1850 to 172,072 in 1860, after it had become a state. [7] A crop failure in 1861, followed by a harsh winter along with poor hunting due to depletion of wild game, led to starvation and severe hardship for many of the eastern Dakota. [8] In the summer of 1862, tensions between the eastern Dakota, the traders, and the Indian agents reached a breaking point, because the Indian agents were late with the U.S. government annuity payments owed to the eastern Dakota. [8] The traders refused to extend credit to the tribesmen for food, in part because the traders suspected the payments might not arrive at all due to the American Civil War. [8] [9] :116,121

On August 17, 1862, four young native men killed five white settlers in Acton, Minnesota. [10] That night, a faction led by Chief Little Crow decided to attack the Lower Sioux Agency the next morning in an effort to drive all settlers out of the Minnesota River valley. [6] :12 In the weeks that followed, Dakota warriors attacked and killed hundreds of settlers, causing thousands to flee the area, [11] :107and took hundreds of "mixed-blood" and white hostages, almost all women and children. [12] [13] The demands of the Civil War slowed the U.S. government response, but on September 23, 1862, an army of volunteer infantry, artillery and citizen militia assembled by Governor Alexander Ramsey and led by Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley finally defeated Little Crow at the Battle of Wood Lake. [6] :63

By the end of the war, 358 settlers had been killed, in addition to 77 soldiers and 29 volunteer militia. [14] The total number of Dakota casualties is unknown. On September 26, 1862, 269 "mixed-blood" and white hostages were released to Sibley's troops at Camp Release. [15] Approximately 2,000 Dakota surrendered or were taken into custody, [16] including at least 1,658 non-combatants, as well as those who had opposed the war and helped to free the hostages. [13] [11] :233 Meanwhile, Little Crow and a group of 150 to 250 followers fled to the northern plains of Dakota Territory and Canada. [17] [18] :83 In less than six weeks, a military commission, composed of officers from the Minnesota volunteer Infantry, sentenced 303 Dakota men to death. President Abraham Lincoln reviewed the convictions and approved death sentences for 39 out of the 303. [6] :72 On December 26, 1862, 38 were hanged in Mankato, Minnesota with one getting a reprieve. This was the largest one-day mass execution in American history. The United States Congress abolished the eastern Dakota and Ho-Chunk (Winnebago) reservations in Minnesota and declared their treaties null and void. In May 1863, the eastern Dakota and Ho-chunk imprisoned at Fort Snelling were exiled from Minnesota. They were placed on riverboats and sent to a reservation in present-day South Dakota. The Ho-Chunk were also initially forced to the Crow Creek reservation, but would later move to Nebraska near the Omaha people to form the Winnebago Reservation. [19] [6] :76,79–80

In 2012 and 2013, Ramsey's call for the Dakota to "be exterminated or driven forever beyond the borders of the State" would be repudiated. [20] [21] In 2019, an apology would be issued to the Dakota people for "150 years of trauma inflicted on Native people at the hands of state government." [22] In 2021, the Minnesota state legislature and the Minnesota Historical Society (MNHS) transferred ownership of 115 acres of land back to the Lower Sioux Indian Community (LSIC), including about half of the lands near the Lower Sioux Agency and part of the historic site of battle. The MNHS and the LSIC have been jointly administering the site. [23]

Background

Previous treaties

The United States government and Dakota leaders negotiated the Treaty of Traverse des Sioux on July 23, 1851, and Treaty of Mendota on August 5, 1851, by which the Dakota ceded large tracts of land in Minnesota Territory to the U.S. in exchange for promises of money and supplies. [24] :1–4

From that time on, the Dakota were to live on a 20-mile (32  km) wide Indian reservation centered on a 150 mile (240 km) stretch of the upper Minnesota River. But, the U.S. Senate removed Article 3 of each treaty, which set out reservations, during the ratification process. In addition, much of the promised compensation went to traders for debts allegedly incurred by the Dakota, at a time when unscrupulous traders made enormous profits on their trade. Supporters of the original bill said these debts had been exaggerated. [25]

Encroachments on Dakota funds

Little Crow, Dakota chief Chief Little Crow Taoyateduta in DC 1858.png
Little Crow, Dakota chief

When Minnesota became a state in 1858, representatives of several Dakota bands led by Little Crow traveled to Washington to negotiate about enforcing existing treaties. But instead, they lost the northern half of the reservation along the Minnesota River. This was a major blow to the standing of Little Crow in the Dakota community.[ citation needed ]

The land was divided into townships and plots for settlement. Logging and agriculture on these plots eliminated surrounding forests and prairies, which interrupted the Dakota's annual cycle of farming, hunting, fishing and gathering wild rice. Hunting by settlers dramatically reduced the wild game available, such as bison, elk, deer and bear. Not only did this decrease the meat available for survival of the Dakota in southern and western Minnesota, but it directly reduced their ability to sell furs to traders for additional supplies.[ citation needed ]

Although payments were guaranteed, the U.S. government was two months behind on both money and food when the war started because of men stealing food. [26] [27] The Federal government was preoccupied by waging the Civil War. [28] Most land in the river valley was not arable, and hunting could no longer support the Dakota community. The Dakota became increasingly discontented over their losses: land, non-payment of annuities, past broken treaties, plus food shortages and famine following crop failure. Tensions increased through the summer of 1862.[ citation needed ]

On 1 January 1862 George E. H. Day (Special Commissioner on Dakota Affairs) wrote a letter to President Lincoln. Day was an attorney from Saint Anthony who had been commissioned to look into the complaints of the Sioux. He wrote:

I have discovered numerous violations of law & many frauds committed by past Agents & a superintendent. I think I can establish frauds to the amount from 20 to 100 thousand dollars & satisfy any reasonable intelligent man that the indians whom I have visited in this state & Wisconsin have been defrauded of more than 100 thousand dollars in or during the four years past. The Superintendent Major Cullen, alone, has saved, as all his friends say, more than 100 thousand in four years out of a salary of 2 thousand a year and all the Agents whose salaries are 15 hundred a year have become rich." [26] Day also accuses Clark Wallace Thompson, Superintendent of Indian Affairs for the Northern Superintendency, of fraud. [29]

Negotiations

On August 4, 1862, representatives of the northern Sisseton and Wahpeton Dakota bands met at the Upper Sioux Agency in the northwestern part of the reservation and successfully negotiated to obtain food. When two other bands of the Dakota, the southern Mdewakanton and the Wahpekute, turned to the Lower Sioux Agency for supplies on August 15, 1862, they were rejected. Indian Agent (and Minnesota State Senator) Thomas Galbraith managed the area and would not distribute food to these bands without payment.[ citation needed ]

At a meeting of the Dakota, the U.S. government and local traders, the Dakota representatives asked the representative of the government traders, Andrew Jackson Myrick, to sell them food on credit. His response was said to be, "So far as I am concerned, if they are hungry let them eat grass or their own dung." [30] But the context of Myrick's comment at the time, early August 1862, is historically unclear. [31] Another version is that Myrick was referring to the Dakota women, who were already combing the floor of the fort's stables for any unprocessed oats to feed to their starving children, along with a little grass. [32]

The effect of Myrick's statement on Little Crow and his band was clear, however. In a letter to General Sibley, Little Crow said it was a major reason for commencing war:

"Dear Sir – For what reason we have commenced this war I will tell you. it is on account of Maj. Galbrait [sic] we made a treaty with the Government a big for what little we do get and then cant get it till our children was dying with hunger – it is with the traders that commence Mr A[ndrew] J Myrick told the Indians that they would eat grass or their own dung." [33]

On August 16, 1862, the treaty payments to the Dakota arrived in St. Paul, Minnesota, and were brought to Fort Ridgely the next day. They arrived too late to prevent violence.[ citation needed ]

War

Incident in Acton and aftermath

This photograph is titled "People escaping from the Indian massacre of 1862 in Minnesota, at dinner on a prairie". It is the right half of a stereograph published by Whitney's Gallery, St. Paul, Minn. This photo is actually "Mixed Bloods" who were rescued by non hostile Dakota. The girl in the foreground wrapped in the striped blanket is Elise Robertson, the sister of Thomas Robertson, a mixed blood who acted as an intermediary between the hostile and non hostile Dakota and the whites. Dakota War of 1862-stereo-right.jpg
This photograph is titled "People escaping from the Indian massacre of 1862 in Minnesota, at dinner on a prairie". It is the right half of a stereograph published by Whitney's Gallery, St. Paul, Minn. This photo is actually "Mixed Bloods" who were rescued by non hostile Dakota. The girl in the foreground wrapped in the striped blanket is Elise Robertson, the sister of Thomas Robertson, a mixed blood who acted as an intermediary between the hostile and non hostile Dakota and the whites.

On August 17, 1862, four young Dakota men on a hunting trip in the Big Woods killed five settlers near a settlement in Acton Township, Minnesota. [34] [11] :81 Some accounts say that the men acted on a dare, following an argument about whether or not they should steal eggs. [11] Others say that the men were provoked when the farmer refused to give them food or water, [35] :304 or liquor. [6] :7 The victims included Robinson Jones, who ran a post office, lodge, and store, and four others, including his wife and 15-year-old adopted daughter. [6] :7–9

Realizing that they were in trouble, the four men – Wahpeton men who had married Mdewakanton women – returned to Rice Creek village to tell their story to Red Middle Voice, the head of their band, [6] :10 and Cut Nose, the "head soldier" of their lodge. [11] Red Middle Voice lobbied his nephew Chief Shakopee III for support, and together they traveled to Little Crow's village near the Lower Sioux Agency. [6]

In the middle of the night, a war council was convened at Little Crow's house, also including other Mdewakanton leaders such as Mankato, Wabasha, Traveling Hail, and Big Eagle. [6] The leaders were divided about the course of action to take; according to many accounts, Little Crow himself had initially been against an uprising and agreed to lead it only after an angry young brave called him a coward. [36] [35] :305 [37] By daybreak, Little Crow ordered an attack on the Lower Sioux Agency to take place that morning. [11] :83

Historian Mary Wingerd has stated that it is "a complete myth that all the Dakota people went to war against the United States" and that it was instead "a faction that went on the offensive". [37] She estimates that fewer than 1,000 mostly Mdewakanton men out of a population of more than 7,000 Dakota were involved in the "Sioux uprising". [35] :307 According to Wingerd, up to 300 Sissetons and Wahpetons may have joined in the fighting – only a fraction out of the 4,000 who lived near the Upper Sioux Agency – in defiance of their tribal elders, who opposed participation in what they warned would be a suicidal offensive. [35]

Attack at the Lower Sioux Agency

On August 18, 1862, Little Crow led a group in a surprise attack on the Lower Sioux (or Redwood) Agency. Trader Andrew Myrick was among the first who were killed. [35] :305 Wounded, he escaped through an attic window, but was gunned down while running for the cornfields. [11] :84 Myrick's decapitated head was later found with grass stuffed into his mouth, [11] in retaliation for Myrick's response, "Let them eat grass!" when asked weeks before if he was willing to extend credit to the Dakota when the government annuity payments had not arrived. [24] :6,12 Killing was suspended for a time while the attackers turned their attention to raiding the stores for flour, pork, clothing, whiskey, guns, and ammunition, allowing others to flee for Fort Ridgely, fourteen miles away. [11] [38] :109 A total of thirteen clerks, traders, and government workers were killed at the agency; another seven were killed as they fled; ten were taken captive; and approximately 47 people escaped. [38] :111

B Company of the 5th Minnesota Volunteer Infantry Regiment sent troops from Fort Ridgely to quell the uprising, were defeated at the Battle of Redwood Ferry. Twenty-four soldiers, including the party's commander (Captain John Marsh), were killed in the battle. [39] Throughout the day, Dakota war parties swept the Minnesota River Valley and near vicinity, killing many settlers. Numerous settlements including the townships of Milford, Leavenworth and Sacred Heart, were surrounded and burned and their populations nearly exterminated. [40]

Captives

During the chaos of the initial attacks, some Dakota tried to warn their friends at the Lower Sioux Agency to flee. [41] [9] :136–138 Even those participating in the attacks made exceptions for who was killed. [9] [35] :305 Reverend Samuel Hinman later recounted that Little Crow himself had come to the Episcopal mission when the shootings started, glared at him, and left, allowing Hinman and his assistant Emily West to escape to Fort Ridgely. [9] George Spencer, a clerk in the trading store, credited Little Crow's head soldier Wakinyantawa (His Own Thunder) for saving his life by placing him under his protection. [9] [42]

Spencer then became one of the few white men taken captive during the war; the rest of the captives were predominantly women and children. [13] A large number of captives were "mixed-blood" Dakota. [35] Although there were repeated threats against the lives of mixed-blood settlers, [9] :142 even the most violent warriors exercised restraint when reminded that by killing mixed-blood Dakota, they would risk retribution from their victims' "full-blood" kinsmen. [35] :306

The large number of captives taken in the early days of the conflict presented a dilemma for the Dakota war leaders. Big Eagle and others argued that they should be returned to the fort, but Little Crow insisted that they were valuable to the war effort and should be kept as hostages for their own protection. [9] :140–141 While the captives were initially held by the soldiers who had captured them, as the days progressed, the logistics of feeding and taking care of the captives were divided up more broadly among families in Little Crow's encampment. [43] [44]

The subject of the rape and abuse of captives during the Dakota War is controversial. [44] Of the white women and girls who were taken captive over the course of war, up to 40 were between the ages of twelve and forty. [11] :190 Historian Gary Clayton Anderson states that nearly all of the young girls taken captive and most of the middle-aged women were forced into relationships which Dakota men perceived as "marriage." [11] :191 He lists "the chance to obtain a wife" as one of the many different motives young Dakota warriors had for participating in the early days of the conflict, along with revenge, plunder, and the chance to gain honors in warfare. [11] :211 There was at least one widely reported case of rape on the first evening of the conflict, August 18, 1862. [44] There were also three well documented cases of female captives who were "adopted" and protected by Dakota families from potential aggressors. [44]

Early Dakota offensives

"The siege of New Ulm, Minnesota" by Henry August Schwabe The Siege of New Ulm Minn.jpg
"The siege of New Ulm, Minnesota" by Henry August Schwabe

Confident with their initial success, the Dakota continued their offensive and attacked the settlement of New Ulm, Minnesota, on August 19, 1862, and again on August 23, 1862. Dakota warriors had initially decided not to attack the strongly defended Fort Ridgely along the river, and turned toward the town, killing settlers along the way. By the time New Ulm was attacked, residents had organized defenses in the town center and were able to keep the Dakota at bay during the brief siege. Dakota warriors penetrated parts of the defenses and burned much of the town. [45] By that evening, a thunderstorm dampened the warfare, preventing further Dakota attacks.[ citation needed ]

Regular soldiers and militia from nearby towns (including two companies of the 5th Minnesota Infantry Regiment, then stationed at Fort Ridgely) reinforced New Ulm. Residents continued to build barricades around the town.[ citation needed ]

The Dakota attacked Fort Ridgely on August 20 and 22, 1862. [46] [47] Although the Dakota were not able to take the fort, they ambushed a relief party from the fort to New Ulm on August 21. The defense at the Battle of Fort Ridgely further limited the ability of the American forces to aid outlying settlements. The Dakota raided farms and small settlements throughout south central Minnesota and what was then eastern Dakota Territory.[ citation needed ]

State military response

Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley Henry Hastings Sibley.jpg
Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley

On August 19, 1862, Minnesota Governor Alexander Ramsey asked his long-time friend and political rival, former Governor Henry Hastings Sibley, to lead an expedition up the Minnesota River for the relief of Fort Ridgely, and gave him an officer's commission as Colonel of Volunteers. [6] :31 Sibley had no previous military experience, but was familiar with the Dakota and the leaders of the Mdewakanton, Wahpekute, Sisseton and Wahpeton bands, having traded among them since arriving in the Minnesota River Valley 28 years prior as a representative of the American Fur Company. [6] [38] :147–148

End of siege at Fort Ridgely

After receiving a message written by Lieutenant Timothy J. Sheehan about the seriousness of the attacks on Fort Ridgely, Colonel Sibley decided to wait for reinforcements, arms, ammunition and provisions before leaving St. Peter. On August 26, Sibley marched toward Fort Ridgely with 1400 men, including six companies of the 6th Minnesota Volunteer Infantry Regiment and 300 "very irregular cavalry." [48] [6] :31 On August 27, a vanguard of mounted men under Colonel Samuel McPhail arrived at Fort Ridgely and lifted the siege; the rest of Sibley's force arrived the next day and established a camp outside the fort. Many of the 250 refugees, some of whom had been confined within Fort Ridgely for eleven days, were transported to St. Paul on August 29. [48] [49]

Militia units under Sibley's command to Fort Ridgely: [50] :772,781,783,784,785,790

  • Captain William J. Cullen's mounted St. Paul Cullen Guards
  • Captain Joseph F. Bean's company "The Eureka Squad"
  • Captain David D. Lloyd's company organized in Rice County
  • Captain Calvin Potter's company of mounted men
  • Captain Mark Hendrick's battery of light artillery
  • Captain J.R. Sterrett's company of mounted men raised at Lake City

Defense along southern and southwestern "frontier"

On August 28, Governor Ramsey sent Judge Charles Eugene Flandrau to the Blue Earth country to secure the state's southern and southwestern "frontier," extending from New Ulm to the northern border of Iowa. [38] :169 On September 3, Flandrau received his officer's commission as a colonel in Minnesota's volunteer militia. He set up his headquarters at South Bend, four miles southwest of Mankato, where he maintained a guard of 80 men. [51] Flandrau organized a line of forts, garrisoned by soldiers under his command, at New Ulm, Garden City, Winnebago, Blue Earth, Martin Lake, Madelia and Marysburg. [6] :49 Flandrau and his companies were relieved on October 5, 1862, by the 25th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment. [38] :170

Blockhouse built as part of a settlers' fort in Peterson, Iowa to defend against anticipated Dakota attacks in 1862 Peterson iowa blockhouse.jpg
Blockhouse built as part of a settlers' fort in Peterson, Iowa to defend against anticipated Dakota attacks in 1862

Iowa Northern Border Brigade

In Iowa, alarm over the Dakota attacks led to the construction of a line of forts from Sioux City to Iowa Lake. The region had already been militarized because of the Spirit Lake Massacre in 1857. After the 1862 conflict began, the Iowa Legislature authorized "not less than 500 mounted men from the frontier counties at the earliest possible moment, and to be stationed where most needed," though this number was soon reduced. Although no fighting took place in Iowa, the Dakota uprising led to the rapid expulsion of the few remaining unassimilated Dakota. [52] [53]

Encounters in early September

Battle of Birch Coulee

1912 lithograph depicting the 1862 Battle of Birch Coulee, by Paul G. Biersach (1845-1927) Battle of Birch Coulee by Paul G. Biersach 1912.png
1912 lithograph depicting the 1862 Battle of Birch Coulee, by Paul G. Biersach (1845-1927)

On August 31, while Sibley trained new soldiers and waited for additional troops, guns, ammunition and food, he sent a group of 153 men on a burial expedition to find and bury dead settlers and soldiers, and ascertain what had happened to Captain John S. Marsh and his men during the attack at Redwood Ferry. [54] :305 The company included members of the 6th Minnesota Infantry Regiment and mounted men of the Cullen Frontier Guards, [55] as well as teams and teamsters sent to bury the dead, accompanied by approximately 20 civilians who had asked to join the burial party. In the early morning hours of September 2, 1862, a group of 200 Dakota warriors surrounded and ambushed their campsite, kicking off a 31-hour siege known as the Battle of Birch Coulee, which continued until Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley finally arrived with more troops and artillery on September 3. The state military suffered its worst casualties during the war, with 13 soldiers dead on the ground, nearly 50 wounded, and more than 80 horses killed, [11] :170 while only 2 Dakota soldiers were confirmed dead. [41]

Attacks in northern Minnesota and Dakota Territory

Farther north, the Dakota attacked several unfortified stagecoach stops and river crossings along the Red River Trails, a settled trade route between Fort Garry (now Winnipeg, Manitoba) and Saint Paul, Minnesota, in the Red River Valley in northwestern Minnesota and eastern Dakota Territory. Many settlers and employees of the Hudson's Bay Company and other local enterprises in this sparsely populated country took refuge in Fort Abercrombie, located in a bend of the Red River of the North about 25 miles (40 km) south of present-day Fargo, North Dakota. Between late August and late September, the Dakota launched several attacks on Fort Abercrombie; all were repelled by its defenders, including Company D of the 5th Minnesota Infantry Regiment, which was garrisoned there, with assistance from other infantry units, citizen soldiers and "The Northern Rangers." [24] :53–58

In the meantime, steamboat and flatboat traffic on the Red River came to a halt. Mail carriers, stage drivers and military couriers were killed while attempting to reach settlements such as Pembina, North Dakota; Fort Garry; St. Cloud, Minnesota; and Fort Snelling. Eventually, the garrison at Fort Abercrombie was relieved by a Minnesota Volunteer Infantry from Fort Snelling, and the civilian refugees were removed to St. Cloud.[ citation needed ]

Army reinforcements

Due to the demands of the American Civil War, Adjutant General Oscar Malmros and Governor Alexander Ramsey of Minnesota had to repeatedly appeal for assistance from the governors of other northern states, the United States Department of War, and President Abraham Lincoln. [6] :87 Finally, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton formed the Department of the Northwest on September 6, 1862 and appointed General John Pope, who had been defeated in the Second Battle of Bull Run, to command it, with orders to quell the violence "using whatever force may be necessary." [11] :179–180 Pope reached Minnesota on September 16. Recognizing the severity of the crisis, Pope instructed Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley to move decisively, but struggled to secure additional Federal troops in time for the war effort. [56] Pope also requested "two or three regiments" from Wisconsin. [57] In the end, only the 25th Wisconsin Volunteer Infantry Regiment arrived on September 22, and was sent to defend temporary military posts along the "Minnesota frontier". [57]

Recruitment for the Minnesota infantry had restarted in earnest in July 1862, following President Lincoln's call for 600,000 volunteers to fight with the Union Army in the Civil War. [54] :301–2 With the outbreak of war in Minnesota in August, the state adjutant general's headquarters ordered the 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th Minnesota Volunteer Infantry Regiments, which were still being constituted, to dispatch troops under Sibley's command as soon as companies were formed. [58] [59] :301,349,386,416,455 Many enlisted soldiers who had been furloughed until after harvest were quickly recalled, and new recruits were urged to enlist, furnishing their own arms and horses if possible. [54] :302

Concerned that his troops lacked experience, Sibley urged Ramsey to hasten the return of the 3rd Minnesota Infantry Regiment to Minnesota, following their humiliating surrender to the Confederates in the First Battle of Murfreesboro. [11] :156 The enlisted men of the 3rd Minnesota were formally exchanged as paroled prisoners on August 28. Placed under the command of Major Abraham E. Welch, who had served as a lieutenant in the 1st Minnesota Infantry Regiment, they joined Sibley's forces at Fort Ridgely on September 13. [60] :158

Battle of Wood Lake

The final decisive battle of the war took place at the Battle of Wood Lake on September 23, 1862, and was a victory for the U.S. forces led by Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley. Following the arrival of more troops, guns, ammunition and provisions, Sibley's entire command had departed Fort Ridgely on September 19. According to one estimate, he had 1,619 men in his army, including the 270 men of the 3rd Minnesota, nine companies of the 6th Minnesota, five companies of the 7th Minnesota, one company of the 9th, 38 Renville Rangers, 28 mounted citizen guards, and 16 citizen-artillerists. [18] Sibley planned to meet Little Crow's warriors on the open plains above the Yellow Medicine River, where he believed his better organized, better equipped forces with their rifled muskets and artillery with exploding shells would have an advantage against the Dakota with their double-barreled shotguns. [61]

Meanwhile, Dakota runners were reporting Sibley's movements every few hours. [62] Chief Little Crow and his soldiers' lodge received word that Sibley's troops had reached the Lower Sioux Agency and would arrive at the area below the Yellow Medicine River around September 21. On the morning of September 22, Little Crow's soldiers' lodge ordered all able-bodied men to march south to the Yellow Medicine River. [13] While hundreds of soldiers marched willingly, others went because they had been threatened by the soldiers' lodge headed by Cut Nose (Marpiya Okinajin); they were also joined by a contingent from the "friendly" Dakota camp who sought to prevent a surprise attack on Sibley's army. [62] [9] :159 A total of 738 men were counted when they reached a point a few miles from Lone Tree Lake, where they had learned that Sibley had set up camp. [13] A council was called, and Little Crow proposed attacking and capturing the camp that night. However, Gabriel Renville (Tiwakan) and Solomon Two Stars argued vehemently against his plan, saying that Little Crow had underestimated the size and strength of Sibley's command, that attacking at night was "cowardly," and that his plan would fail because they and others would not help them. [63] [64]

Wood Lake Battlefield Wood Lake Battlefield 2012.JPG
Wood Lake Battlefield

Upon learning that the army had thrown up breastworks to fortify the campsite, Rattling Runner (Rdainyanka) and the leaders of the "hostile" Dakota soldiers' lodge finally agreed that it would be unsafe to attack that night, and planned to attack Sibley's troops when they were marching on the road to the Upper Sioux Agency early in the morning. [41] [64] On the night of September 22, Little Crow, Chief Big Eagle and others carefully moved their warriors into position under cover of darkness, often with a clear view of Sibley's troops, who were unaware of their presence. [41] Dakota fighters lay in the tall grass along the side of the road with tufts of grass woven into their headdresses for disguise, waiting patiently for daybreak when they expected the troops to march. [6] [11] :184

Much to the surprise of the Dakota, at about 7 am on September 23, a group of soldiers from the 3rd Minnesota Infantry Regiment left camp in four or five wagons, on an unauthorized trip to forage for potatoes at the Upper Sioux Agency. [60] About half a mile from camp, after crossing the bridge over the creek to the other side of the ravine and ascending 100 yards into the high prairie, the lead wagon belonging to Company G was attacked by a squad of 25 to 30 Dakota warriors who sprang up and began shooting. [65] [66] [11] One soldier jumped out of the wagon and returned fire; the soldiers in the rear wagons started shooting; and the Battle of Wood Lake had begun. [65] Not waiting for orders or permission, Major Abraham E. Welch led 200 men from the 3rd Minnesota with a line of skirmishers to the left and the right following in reserve. They advanced to a point 300 yards beyond the stream, when an officer rode up to Major Welch with instructions from Colonel Sibley to fall back to camp. Welch obeyed reluctantly and the men of the 3rd Minnesota retreated down the slope toward the stream where they would sustain most of their casualties. [66]

Battle of Wood Lake, 1862 Battle of Wood Lake 1862 by Alonzo P Connolly.png
Battle of Wood Lake, 1862

Once the 3rd Minnesota had retreated across the creek, they were joined by the Renville Rangers, a unit of "nearly all mixed-bloods" under Lieutenant James Gorman, sent by Sibley to reinforce them. [11] :185 The Dakota forces formed a fan-shaped line, threatening their flank. [61] Seeing that the Dakota were now passing down the ravine to try to outflank their men on the right, Sibley ordered Lieutenant Colonel William Rainey Marshall, with five companies of the 7th Minnesota Infantry Regiment and a six-pounder artillery piece under Captain Mark Hendricks, to advance to the north side of the camp; he also ordered two companies from the 6th Minnesota Infantry Regiment to reinforce them. [54] Marshall deployed his men equally in dugouts and in a skirmish line which fired as they gradually crawled forward and finally charged, successfully driving the Dakota back from the ravine. [67] On the extreme left, Major Robert N. McLaren led a company from the 6th Regiment around the south side of the lake to defend a ridge overlooking a ravine, and defeated a Dakota flanking attack on the other side. [54]

The Battle of Wood Lake ended after about two hours, as Little Crow and the Dakota warriors retreated in disorder. [61] Chief Mankato was killed in the battle by a cannonball. [6] :62 Big Eagle later explained that hundreds of Dakota fighters were unable to get involved or fire a shot in the battle, because they had been positioned too far out. [41] Sibley decided not to pursue the retreating Dakota, mainly because he lacked the cavalry to do so. [6] :64 On his orders, Sibley's men recovered and buried 14 fallen Dakota. [67] [6] :63 The exact Dakota losses are unknown but the fight effectively ended the war. Sibley lost seven men and another 34 were seriously wounded. [61]

"Surrender" at Camp Release

Camp Release, 1862 Camp Release, 1862.png
Camp Release, 1862

At Camp Release on September 26, 1862, the Dakota Peace Party handed over 269 former prisoners to the troops commanded by Colonel Sibley. [15] The captives included 162 "mixed-bloods" (mixed-race) and 107 whites, mostly women and children, who had been held hostage by the "hostile" Dakota camp, which broke up as Little Crow and some of his followers fled to the northern plains. In the nights that followed, a growing number of Mdewakanton warriors who had participated in battles quietly joined the "friendly" Dakota at Camp Release; many did not want to spend winter on the plains and were persuaded by Sibley's earlier promise to punish only those who had killed settlers. [11] :187

The surrendered Dakota warriors and their families were held while military trials took place from September to November 1862. Of the 498 trials, 303 men were convicted and sentenced to death. [6] :72 President Lincoln commuted the sentences of all but 38. [68] A few weeks prior to the execution, the convicted men were sent to Mankato, while 1,658 Indians and "mixed bloods", including their families and the "friendly" Dakota, were sent to a compound south of Fort Snelling. [16]

Escape and death of Little Crow

Little Crow had fled northward on September 24, the morning after the Battle of Wood Lake, vowing never to return to the Minnesota River valley again. He and the Mdewakanton who followed him hoped to ally with the western Sioux – including the Yankton, Yanktonai and Lakota – and also hoped to gain support from the British in Canada, but received a mixed response. [9] Little Crow was turned away by Chief Standing Buffalo and the Sisseton north of Big Stone Lake, as well as the Yanktons to the southwest along the Missouri River. [69] :62

Rebuffed by leaders of other tribes and accompanied by a dwindling number of his own followers, Little Crow eventually returned to Minnesota in late June 1863. [9] He was killed on July 3, 1863, near Hutchinson, Minnesota, while gathering raspberries with his teenage son, Wowinape. The pair were seen by Nathan Lamson and his son Chauncey, who had been out hunting. Lamson and Little Crow exchanged fire, and Little Crow was mortally wounded by a ball in his breast. [6] :83

Weeks later, when it was discovered that the body was that of Little Crow, Lamson received a $500 bounty from the state of Minnesota for his scalp. [9] :178 In 1879, the Minnesota Historical Society put Little Crow's skeletal remains on display in the Minnesota State Capitol. [70] One notable objector to the display was former Lower Sioux Agency surgeon Dr. Asa Daniels, who wrote in 1908 that "Such a spectacle reflects sadly upon the humanity of Christian people." [71] Upon the request of Little Crow's grandson, Jesse Wakeman, his remains were removed from display in 1915, and finally returned to the family for burial in 1971 by historical archaeologist Alan Woolworth. [71] [70] Wakeman noted on that day that the treatment of Little Crow's remains had "rankled" him and his people more than the way he had been killed. [71]

Chief Standing Buffalo led his band to the northern plains and Canada, where they wandered for nine years. After his death in an encounter with Gros Ventre in Montana, his son took the band into Saskatchewan. There they were ultimately given a reserve, where these northern Sisseton have stayed.[ citation needed ]

Aftermath

Trials

On September 27, 1862, Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley ordered the creation of a military commission to conduct trials of the Dakota. One year later, the judge advocate general would determine that Sibley did not have the authority to convene trials of the Dakota, due to his level of prejudice, and that his actions had violated Article 65 of the United States Articles of War. However, by then the executions had already occurred, and the American Civil War continued to distract the U.S. government. [72] [11] :214–215

The trials themselves were deficient in many ways, even by military standards; and the officers who oversaw them did not conduct them according to military law. The 400-odd of trials commenced on 28 September 1862 and were completed on 3 November; some lasted less than 5 minutes. No one explained the proceedings to the defendants, nor were the Sioux represented by defense attorneys.[ citation needed ] Legal history scholar Carol Chomsky writes in the Stanford Law Review:

The Dakota were tried, not in a state or federal criminal court, but before a military commission composed completely of Minnesota settlers. They were convicted, not for the crime of murder, but for killings committed in warfare. The official review was conducted, not by an appellate court, but by the President of the United States. Many wars took place between Americans and members of the Indian nations, but in no others did the United States apply criminal sanctions to punish those defeated in war. [72]

The trials were also conducted in an atmosphere of extreme racist hostility towards the defendants expressed by the citizenry, the elected officials of the state of Minnesota and by the men conducting the trials themselves. By 3 November, the military commission had held trials of 392 Dakota men, with as many as 42 tried in a single day. [72] Not surprisingly, given the socially explosive conditions under which the trials took place, by 7 November the verdicts were in. The military commission announced that 303 Sioux prisoners had been convicted of murder and rape and were sentenced to death. [6] :71

President Lincoln was informed by Maj. Gen. John Pope of the sentences on 10 November 1862 in a telegraphic dispatch from Minnesota. [72] His response to Pope was: "Please forward, as soon as possible, the full and complete record of these convictions. And if the record does not indicate the more guilty and influential, of the culprits, please have a careful statement made on these points and forwarded to me. Please send all by mail." [73]

When the death sentences were made public, Henry Whipple, the Episcopal bishop of Minnesota and a reformer of U.S. Indian policy, responded by publishing an open letter. He also went to Washington, D.C. in the fall of 1862 to urge Lincoln to proceed with leniency. [74] On the other hand, General Pope and Minnesota Senator Morton S. Wilkinson warned Lincoln that the white population opposed leniency. Governor Ramsey warned Lincoln that, unless all 303 Sioux were executed, "[P]rivate revenge would on all this border take the place of official judgment on these Indians." [75]

Lincoln – despite his many other pressing responsibilities in running the country and conducting the War completed his review of the transcripts of the 303 trials with the help of two trusted White House lawyers in under a month. [11] :251 On 11 December 1862, he addressed the Senate regarding his final decision (as he had been requested to do by a resolution passed by that body on 5 December 1862):

Anxious to not act with so much clemency as to encourage another outbreak on the one hand, nor with so much severity as to be real cruelty on the other, I caused a careful examination of the records of trials to be made, in view of first ordering the execution of such as had been proved guilty of violating females. Contrary to my expectations, only two of this class were found. I then directed a further examination, and a classification of all who were proven to have participated in massacres, as distinguished from participation in battles. This class numbered forty, and included the two convicted of female violation. One of the number is strongly recommended by the commission which tried them for commutation to ten years' imprisonment. I have ordered the other thirty-nine to be executed on Friday, the 19th instant." [76]

In the end, Lincoln commuted the death sentences of 264 prisoners, but he allowed the execution of 39 men. However, "[on] December 23, [Lincoln] suspended the execution of one of the condemned men [...] after [General] Sibley telegraphed that new information led him to doubt the prisoner's guilt." [72] Thus, the number of condemned men was reduced to the final 38.[ citation needed ]

Even partial clemency resulted in protests from Minnesota, which persisted until the Secretary of the Interior offered white Minnesotans "reasonable compensation for the depredations committed."[ citation needed ] Republicans did not fare as well in Minnesota in the 1864 election as they had before. Ramsey (by then a senator) informed Lincoln that more hangings would have resulted in a larger electoral majority. The President reportedly replied, "I could not afford to hang men for votes."[ citation needed ]

Execution

Companies D, E, and H of the 9th Minnesota, Companies A, B, F, G, H, and K 10th Minnesota and the 1st Minnesota Cavalry were part of the 2,000 man military guard [77] for the 38 prisoners hanged December 26, 1862, in Mankato, Minnesota. [78] [79] It remains the largest single-day mass execution in American history. The size of the guard force was dictated by the numbers of angry Minnesotans encamped at Mankato and the concern of what they wanted to do to the prisoners not being hanged. [77]

Drawing of the 1862 mass hanging in Mankato, Minnesota Execution of 38 Sioux Indians at Mankato Minnesota 1862.jpg
Drawing of the 1862 mass hanging in Mankato, Minnesota
Wa-kan-o-zhan-zhan (Medicine Bottle) Wa-kan-o-zhan-zhan (Medicine Bottle), executed at Fort Snelling, November 11, 1865, for participating in the massacre of 1862, by Zimmerman, Charles A., 1844-1909.jpg
Wa-kan-o-zhan-zhan (Medicine Bottle)
Hanging of Little Six and Medicine Bottle 1865 Hanging of Little Six and Medicine Bottle CDV, 1865.png
Hanging of Little Six and Medicine Bottle 1865

The execution was public, on a square platform designed to drop from under the condemned. The gallows was built around the outside of the square with ten nooses per side. When the platform dropped the rope of Cut Nose broke. Despite appearing dead he was hauled back up with a new rope. After the regimental surgeons pronounced the men dead, they were buried en masse in an unfrozen sand bar of the Minnesota River. Before they were buried, an unknown person nicknamed "Dr. Sheardown" possibly removed some of the prisoners' skin. [80] Despite having a large guard force posted at the grave-site, all of the bodies were exhumed and taken away the first night. [77]

At least three Sioux leaders escaped to Canada. In January 1864, Little Six and Medicine Bottle were captured, drugged, kidnapped and taken across the Canada–United States border to Fort Pembina, where they were arrested by Major Edwin A. C. Hatch. [81] Hatch's Independent Battalion of Cavalry took the two chiefs to Fort Snelling, where they were tried and later hanged in November 1865. [81] [82] [83] Little Leaf managed to evade capture.[ citation needed ]

Medical aftermath

Because of the high demand for cadavers for anatomical study, several doctors wanted to obtain the bodies after the execution. The grave was reopened in the night and the bodies were distributed among the doctors, a practice common in the era. William Worrall Mayo received the body of Maȟpiya Akan Nažiŋ (Stands on Clouds), also known as "Cut Nose".[ citation needed ]

Mayo brought the body of Maȟpiya Akan Nažiŋ to Le Sueur, Minnesota, where he dissected it in the presence of medical colleagues. [84] :77–78 Afterward, he had the skeleton cleaned, dried and varnished. Mayo kept it in an iron kettle in his home office. His sons received their first lessons in osteology based on this skeleton. [84] :167

In the late 20th century, the identifiable remains of Maȟpiya Akan Nažiŋ and other Dakota were returned by the Mayo Clinic to a Dakota tribe for reburial per the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The Mayo Clinic created a scholarship for a Native American student as apology for having misused the chief's body. [85] [86]

Imprisonment

The remaining convicted Dakota were held in prison that winter. The following spring they were transferred to Camp McClellan in Davenport, Iowa, where they were imprisoned from 1863 to 1866. [87] [88] By the time of their release, one-third of the prisoners had died of disease. The survivors were sent with their families to Nebraska. Their families had already been expelled from Minnesota.[ citation needed ]

During their incarceration at Camp Kearney, the Dakota prison within Camp McClellan, Presbyterian missionaries attempted to convert the Dakota to Christianity and have them abandon their native cultural and spiritual beliefs and practices. [89] [90]

In 1864, change of command at the camp allowed for a more lenient approach to the Dakota. [90] Using the general public’s fascination to their advantage, they began to craft ornamental items, such as finger rings, bead work, wooden fish, hatchets, and bows and arrows, and sold them to support their needs within the internment camp, such as blankets, clothing, and food. [91] They also sent blankets, clothing, and money to their families who had been forcibly exiled to the Crow Creek Reservation in South Dakota. [91] In addition to packages, they maintained family ties communicating via postal mail. Profiteers exploited public bigotry by using the Dakota as spectacles, selling two-hour viewing sessions, forcing Dakota into public races with horses, and paying them for their dance ceremonies. [90] [91]  

During their incarceration, the Dakota continued to struggle for their rightful compensation of the lands ceded by treaty, as well as their freedom, even enlisting the help of sympathetic camp guards and settlers to assist. In April 1864, the imprisoned Dakota helped pay for missionary Thomas Williamson’s trip to Washington, D.C. to argue in favor of the prisoners’ release. He received a receptive audience in President Lincoln, but only a few Dakota would be released, partially due to a proviso Lincoln had made with Minnesota congressmen who continued to refuse clemency. [91] The remaining Dakota would eventually be released two years later by President Andrew Johnson in April 1866. They, along with their families from the Crow Creek Reservation, were relocated to Santee Sioux Reservation in Nebraska. [89]

Pike Island internment

Dakota internment camp, Fort Snelling, winter 1862 Dakota-Interment-Pike Island.jpg
Dakota internment camp, Fort Snelling, winter 1862
One of Little Crow's wives and two children at Fort Snelling internment compound, 1864 Little Crows wife and two children at Fort Snelling prison compound.jpeg
One of Little Crow's wives and two children at Fort Snelling internment compound, 1864

On November 7, 1862, the remaining 1,658 Dakota non-combatants – primarily women, children, and elders, but also 250 men – began a 150-mile journey from the Lower Sioux Agency to Fort Snelling. [16] [35] :319 They traveled in a wagon train that was four miles long, protected by only 300 soldiers under Lieutenant Colonel William Marshall. [35] Marshall urged The Saint Paul Daily Press to remind citizens living along their route that the Dakota they were escorting were "not the guilty Indians...but friendly Indians, women and children." [35] :319,396 When the caravan reached Henderson, however, an angry mob "armed with guns, knives, clubs and stones" overwhelmed the troops and attacked the Dakota, fatally injuring a baby. [35] :320 They finally reached Fort Snelling on the evening of November 13, 1862. [16]

At first, they were settled in an open camp below Fort Snelling, but were soon relocated to a fenced stockade to protect them from further attacks. [35] Living conditions and sanitation were poor, and infectious diseases such as measles struck the camp, killing an estimated 102 to 300 Dakota. [16] In April 1863, the U.S. Congress abolished the reservation, declared all previous treaties with the Dakota null and void, and undertook proceedings to expel the Dakota people entirely from Minnesota. The State issued a bounty of $25 per scalp on any Dakota male found free within the boundaries of the state to ensure their removal. [92] The only exception to this legislation applied to 208 Mdewakanton, who had remained neutral or assisted white settlers in the conflict.[ citation needed ]

In May 1863, the surviving 1,300 Dakota were crowded aboard two steamboats and relocated to the Crow Creek Reservation, in Dakota Territory. At that time the place was stricken by drought making habitation difficult. In addition to those dying during the journey, more than 200 Dakota died within six months of arriving, many being the children. [93] [94] [95]

Firsthand accounts

Until 1894, most published accounts of the war were told from the point of view of European-American settlers and soldiers who had taken part in the war, [96] and to a lesser extent, the women who had been taken captive. [97] [98] Many of these first-person narratives tended to focus on victim accounts of atrocities committed during the war. [99]

The first published narrative of the war told from the point of view of a Dakota leader who had fought in the uprising was compiled by historian Return Ira Holcombe in 1894. Holcombe interviewed Chief Big Eagle with the help of two translators. [96] [41]

In 1988, historians Gary Clayton Anderson and Alan R. Woolworth published Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862. The volume features excerpts from thirty-six Dakota narratives. [17] Many of the narratives come from “mixed-blood” eyewitnesses of events. [100] The narratives reflect a spectrum of views on the conflict, representative of factions within the Dakota community. [17]

Settler narratives

There are numerous firsthand accounts by European Americans of the wars and raids. For example, the compilation by Charles Bryant, titled Indian Massacre in Minnesota, included these graphic descriptions of the murders of settlers on the night of August 18, taken from an interview with Justina Kreiger about events she had not witnessed directly: [11] :99

Mr. Massipost had two daughters, young ladies, intelligent and accomplished. These the savages murdered most brutally. The head of one of them was afterward found, severed from the body, attached to a fish-hook, and hung upon a nail. His son, a young man of twenty-four years, was also killed. Mr. Massipost and a son of eight years escaped to New Ulm. [101] :141 The daughter of Mr. Schwandt, enceinte [pregnant], was cut open, as was learned afterward, the child taken alive from the mother, and nailed to a tree. The son of Mr. Schwandt, aged thirteen years, who had been beaten by the Indians, until dead, as was supposed, was present, and saw the entire tragedy. He saw the child taken alive from the body of his sister, Mrs. Waltz, and nailed to a tree in the yard. It struggled some time after the nails were driven through it! This occurred in the forenoon of Monday, 18th of August, 1862. [101] :300–301

Although Mary Schwandt later disputed this lurid account of events based on discussions with her brother August Schwandt, who witnessed the killing of his family, the story of the nailing of children to fences and trees was repeated over and over again in Minnesota newspapers, by other survivors of the massacre, and by historians. [11] :99,303 Burial details burying victims of the killings also reported never finding such a child. [11] :303

Newspaper editorials

S.P. Yeomans, editor of the Sioux City Register, circa May 30, 1863, wrote "with unflinching disregard for humankind" [102] an opinion piece complaining about the arrival in Iowa of Dakota women and children who had been exiled from Minnesota: [102]

The formerly favorite steamer, Florence," he wrote, "arrived at our levee on Tuesday; but instead of the cheerful faces of Capt. Throckmorten and Clerk Gorman we saw those of strangers; and instead of her usual lading of merchandise for our merchants, she was crowded from stem to stern, and from hold to hurricane deck with old squaws and papooses — about 1,400 in all — the non combative remnants of the Santee Sioux of Minnesota, en route to their new home…. [103]

The Dakota have kept alive their own accounts of events suffered by their people. [104] [105]

Continued conflict

After the expulsion of the Dakota, some refugees and warriors made their way to Lakota lands. Battles between the forces of the Department of the Northwest and combined Lakota and Dakota forces continued through 1864. In the 1863 operations against the Sioux in North Dakota, Colonel Sibley, with 2,000 men, pursued the Dakota into Dakota Territory. Sibley's army defeated the Lakota and Dakota in four major battles: the Battle of Big Mound on July 24, 1863; the Battle of Dead Buffalo Lake on July 26, 1863; the Battle of Stony Lake on July 28, 1863; and the Battle of Whitestone Hill on September 3, 1863. The Dakota retreated further, but faced Sully's Northwest Indian Expedition in 1864. General Alfred Sully led a force from near Fort Pierre, South Dakota, and decisively defeated the Dakota at the Battle of Killdeer Mountain on July 28, 1864 and at the Battle of the Badlands on August 9, 1864. The following year Sully's Northwest Indian Expedition of 1865 operated against the Dakota in Dakota Territory.[ citation needed ]

Conflicts continued. Within two years, settlers' encroachment on Lakota land sparked Red Cloud's War; the US desire for control of the Black Hills in South Dakota prompted the government to authorize an offensive in 1876 in what would be called the Black Hills War. By 1881, the majority of the Sioux had surrendered to American military forces. In 1890, the Wounded Knee Massacre ended all effective Sioux resistance.[ citation needed ]

Bounties

In reaction to raids by Dakota in southern Minnesota, on July 4, 1863 Governor Ramsey ordered the State adjutant general, Oscar Malmros to issue General Orders No. 41 initiating “volunteer scouts” who, providing their own arms, equipment, and provisions, patrolled from the town of Sauk Centre to the northern edge of Sibley County. [106] In addition to being paid two dollars a day, $25 bounties were offered for Dakota male scalps. On July 20, the original bounty order was amended to limit it to "hostile" warriors, instead of all Dakota males and scalps were no longer required. A bounty of $75 a scalp was offered to those not in military service; the amount was increased to $200 by Henry Swift Minnesota's new governor on September 22, 1863. [106] Newspapers during that time described the taking of many scalps, including that of Taoyateduta (Little Crow). [107] A total of $325 was paid out to four people collecting bounties. [106]

Andrew Good Thunder and his wife Sarah, a Dakota family who returned to Minnesota after the war Good Thunder and Sarah.jpg
Andrew Good Thunder and his wife Sarah, a Dakota family who returned to Minnesota after the war

Minnesota after the war

During the war, at least 30,000 settlers fled their farms and homes in the Minnesota River valley and surrounding upland prairie areas. [69] :61 One year later, no one had returned to 19 out of 23 counties that had been affected by the conflict. [69]

Following the American Civil War, however, the area was resettled. By the mid-1870s, it was again being used and developed by European Americans for agriculture.[ citation needed ]

The federal government re-established the Lower Sioux Indian Reservation at the site of the Lower Sioux Agency near Morton. It was not until the 1930s that the US created the smaller Upper Sioux Indian Reservation near Granite Falls.[ citation needed ]

Although some Dakota had opposed the war, most were expelled from Minnesota, including those who attempted to assist settlers. The Yankton Sioux Chief Struck by the Ree deployed some of his warriors to aid settlers, but he was not judged friendly enough to be allowed to remain in the state immediately after the war. By the 1880s, a number of Dakota had moved back to the Minnesota River valley, notably the Good Thunder, Wabasha, Bluestone and Lawrence families. They were joined by Dakota families who had been living under the protection of Bishop Henry Benjamin Whipple and the trader Alexander Faribault.[ citation needed ]

By the late 1920s, the conflict began to pass into the realm of oral tradition in Minnesota. Eyewitness accounts were communicated first-hand to individuals who survived into the 1970s and early 1980s. The stories of innocent individuals and families of struggling pioneer farmers being killed by Dakota have remained in the consciousness of the prairie communities of south central Minnesota. [108] Descendants of the 38 Dakota killed, and their people, also remember the warfare and their people being dispossessed of their land and sent into exile in the west.[ citation needed ]

During the uprising the New Ulm Battery was formed under militia law to defend the settlement from the Dakota. That militia is the only Civil War era militia remaining in the United States today. [109] Many of the settlers in New Ulm had migrated from a German community in Ohio. In 1862, upon hearing of the uprising, their former neighbors in Cincinnati purchased a 10 Pound Mountain Howitzer and shipped to Minnesota. [109] General Sibley gave the battery one of the 6 pounders from Fort Ridgely. Today those guns are in the possession of the Brown County Museum. [109]

Repudiation of Ramsey's speech and apology to Dakota people

On August 16, 2012, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton issued a proclamation calling for a Day of Remembrance and Reconciliation for the 150th anniversary of the Dakota War and also repudiating Governor Alexander Ramsey's calls for the Dakota people to be either exterminated or driven from the state when he addressed the Minnesota state legislature in September 1862; flags were also ordered to be flown at half-staff statewide. [110] Dayton declared, among other things, that "The viciousness and violence, which were commonplace 150 years ago in Minnesota, are not accepted or allowed now.” [110] On May 2, 2013, Dayton would again issue a repudiation Ramsey's September 1862 speech, which he claimed he was "appalled" by, and call for a Day of Reconciliation, which also involved flags being flow at half staff. [21] On December 26, 2019, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz would issue an apology for the 1862 Mankato hangings and other acts against the Dakota people while participating in the annual Dakota 38+2 Memorial Ride and Run which was held at the site of the hangings. [22] Walz stated, among other things, that "On behalf of the people of Minnesota and as governor, I express my deepest condolences for what happened here, and our deepest apologies for what happened to the Dakota people” and that “While we can’t undo over 150 years of trauma inflicted on Native people at the hands of state government, we can work to do everything possible to ensure that Native people are seen, heard, and valued today.” [22]

Land returned

On February 12, 2021, the Minnesota government and Minnesota Historical Society transferred ownership of half of the lands near the Battle of Lower Sioux Agency to the Lower Sioux Community. [23] [111] [112] The Minnesota Historical Society owned approximately 115 acres of land while the state government owned near 114 acres. [23] [112] About the return of their lands, Lower Sioux President Robert Larsen said, "I don't know if it's ever happened before, where a state gave land back to a tribe. [Our ancestors] paid for this land over and over with their blood, with their lives. It's not a sale; it's been paid for by the ones that aren't here anymore". [112]

Monuments and memorials

Monument indicating where the thirty-eight Dakota were hanged following the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862, Mankato, Minnesota. Placed in 1912, it was removed in 1971. 38-hanged.jpg
Monument indicating where the thirty-eight Dakota were hanged following the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862, Mankato, Minnesota. Placed in 1912, it was removed in 1971.

Commemorative events

Several works were completed that marked the 150th anniversary of the mass execution:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Fort Ridgely</span> Battle of the American Civil War

The Battle of Fort Ridgely was an early battle in the Dakota War of 1862. Built between 1853–1855 in the southern part of what was then the territory of Minnesota, Fort Ridgely was the only military post between the Dakota Reservation and the settlers. As of August 18, 1862, the fort was garrisoned by 76 men and two officers of Company B of the 5th Minnesota Infantry Regiment, under the command of Captain John S. Marsh, who had fought in the Civil War in the First Battle of Bull Run.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Ridgely</span> Former frontier U.S. Army outpost in present-day Nicollet County, Minnesota (1851-67)

Fort Ridgely was a frontier United States Army outpost from 1851 to 1867, built 1853–1854 in Minnesota Territory. The Sioux called it Esa Tonka. It was located overlooking the Minnesota river southwest of Fairfax, Minnesota. Half of the fort's land was part of the south reservation in the Minnesota river valley for the Mdewakanton and Wahpekute tribes. Fort Ridgely had no defensive wall, palisade, or guard towers. The Army referred to the fort as the "New Post on the Upper Minnesota" until it was named for three Maryland Army Officers named Ridgely, who died during the Mexican–American War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Little Crow</span> Chief of Kaposia band of Mdewakantons

Little Crow III was a Mdewakanton Dakota chief who led a faction of the Dakota in a five-week war against the United States in 1862.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lower Sioux Agency</span> United States historic place

The Lower Sioux Agency, or Redwood Agency, was the federal administrative center for the Lower Sioux Indian Reservation in what became Redwood County, Minnesota, United States. It was the site of the Battle of Lower Sioux Agency on August 18, 1862, the first organized battle of the Dakota War of 1862.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Whitestone Hill</span> Battle of the American Civil War

The Battle of Whitestone Hill was the culmination of the 1863 operations against the Sioux or Dakota people in Dakota Territory. Brigadier General Alfred Sully attacked a village September 3–5, 1863. The Native Americans in the village included Yanktonai, Santee, and Teton (Lakota) Sioux. Sully killed, wounded, or captured 300 to 400 Sioux, including women and children, at a cost of about 60 casualties. Sully would continue the conflict with another campaign in 1864.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Camp Release State Monument</span> United States historic place

Camp Release State Monument is located on the edge of Montevideo, Minnesota, United States, just off Highway 212 in Lac qui Parle County, in the 6-acre Camp Release State Memorial Wayside. The Camp Release Monument stands as a reminder of Minnesota's early state history. The Minnesota River Valley and Montevideo were important sites in the Dakota War of 1862.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Big Eagle</span> Native American leader (Dakota chief)

Big Eagle was the chief of a band of Mdewakanton Dakota in Minnesota. He played an important role as a military leader in the Dakota War of 1862. Big Eagle surrendered soon after the Battle of Wood Lake and was sentenced to death and imprisoned, but was pardoned by President Abraham Lincoln in 1864. Big Eagle's narrative, "A Sioux Story of the War" was first published in 1894, and is one of the most widely cited first-person accounts of the 1862 war in Minnesota from a Dakota point of view.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Wood Lake</span> Final battle in U.S.–Dakota War of 1862

The Battle of Wood Lake occurred on September 23, 1862, and was the final battle in the Dakota War of 1862. The two-hour battle, which actually took place at nearby Lone Tree Lake, was a decisive victory for the U.S. forces led by Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley. With heavy casualties inflicted on the Dakota forces led by Chief Little Crow, the "hostile" Dakota warriors dispersed. Little Crow and 150 followers fled for the northern plains, while other Mdewakantons quietly joined the "friendly" Dakota camp started by the Sisseton and Wahpeton bands, which would soon become known as Camp Release.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Birch Coulee</span> Siege during U.S.–Dakota War of 1862

The Battle of Birch Coulee occurred September 2–3, 1862 and resulted in the heaviest casualties suffered by U.S. forces during the Dakota War of 1862. The battle occurred after a group of Dakota warriors followed a U.S. burial expedition, including volunteer infantry, mounted guards and civilians, to an exposed plain where they were setting up camp. That night, 200 Dakota soldiers surrounded the camp and ambushed the Birch Coulee campsite in the early morning, commencing a siege that lasted for over 30 hours, until the arrival of reinforcements and artillery led by Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attack at the Lower Sioux Agency</span> Battle as part of the Dakota War of 1862

The Attack at the Lower Sioux Agency was the first organized attack led by Dakota leader Little Crow in Minnesota on August 18, 1862 and is considered the initial engagement of the Dakota War of 1862. It resulted in 13 settler deaths, with seven more killed while fleeing the agency for Fort Ridgely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battles of New Ulm</span> Battle of the American Civil War

The Battles of New Ulm, also known as the New Ulm Massacre, were two battles in August 1862 between Dakota men and European settlers and militia in New Ulm, Minnesota. They were part of the Dakota War of 1862. The Dakota forces attacked New Ulm on two separate days. After the second attack, the town was evacuated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surrender at Camp Release</span>

The Surrender at Camp Release was the final act in the Dakota War of 1862. After the Battle of Wood Lake, Colonel Henry Hastings Sibley had considered pursuing the retreating Sioux, but he realized he did not have the resources for a vigorous pursuit. Furthermore, he was aware that Chief Little Crow had been losing support and was in contact with several Mdewakanton chiefs who had signaled their opposition to further conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gabriel Renville</span>

Gabriel Renville, also known as Ti'wakan, was Chief of the Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate Sioux Tribe from 1866 until his death in 1892. He opposed conflict with the United States during the Dakota War of 1862 and was a driving force within the Dakota Peace Party. Gabrielle Renville's influence and political leadership were critical to the eventual creation of the Lake Traverse Indian Reservation, which lies mainly in present-day South Dakota.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate</span>

The Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, formerly Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe/Dakota Nation, is a federally recognized tribe comprising two bands and two subdivisions of the Isanti or Santee Dakota people. They are on the Lake Traverse Reservation in northeast South Dakota.

Shakopee or Chief Shakopee may refer to one of at least three Mdewakanton Dakota leaders who lived in the area that became Minnesota from the late 18th century through 1865. The name comes from the Dakota Śakpe meaning "Six." According to tribal histories, the very first "Shakpe" was called that because he was the sixth child of a set of sextuplets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wabasha III</span> Head chief of Santee Sioux

Wabasha III (Wapahaśa) was a prominent Dakota Sioux chief, also known as Joseph Wabasha. He succeeded his father as head chief of the Mdewakanton Dakota in 1836. Following the Dakota War of 1862 and the forced removal of the Dakota to Crow Creek Reservation, Wabasha became known as head chief of the Santee Sioux. In the final years of his life, Chief Wabasha helped his people rebuild their lives at the Santee Reservation in Nebraska.

The 1st Dakota Cavalry was a Union battalion of two companies raised in the Dakota Territory during the American Civil War. They were deployed along the frontier, primarily to protect the settlers during the Sioux Uprising of 1862.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birch Coulee Battlefield</span> United States historic place

Birch Coulee Battlefield in Renville County, Minnesota, United States, was the site of the Battle of Birch Coulee, the costliest military engagement for U.S. forces during the Dakota War of 1862. It is now a historic site with self-guided trails and markers interpreting the battle from both sides. Birch Coulee was nominated to the National Register of Historic Places for having state-level significance in military history, and was listed in 1973.

The Department of the Northwest was an U.S. Army Department created September 6, 1862 to put down the Sioux uprising in Minnesota. Major General John Pope was made commander of the Department. At the end of the Civil War the Department was redesignated the Department of Dakota. Immediately upon arriving in St. Paul General Pope sent letters to the Governors of Iowa and Wisconsin for additional troops to assist the 5th Minnesota Infantry Regiment. From Iowa he got the 27th Iowa Infantry Regiment and from Wisconsin he received the 25th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment. Both quickly crossed the border to assist with the uprising. The 25th Wisconsin was in Minnesota three months and the 27th Iowa was there a month before both headed south. After they departed, the Minnesota District would be garrisoned by Minnesota units: 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th Infantry Regiments, 1st and 2nd Minnesota Cavalry Regiments plus Minnesota Independent Cavalry Battalion as well as the 3rd Minnesota Light Artillery Battery. In 1864 companies of the 30th Wisconsin Infantry Regiment would see service in the Minnesota and Dakota Districts too.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Snana</span> Dakota woman also known as Maggie Brass

Snana (1839–1908), also known as Maggie Brass, was a Mdewakanton Dakota woman who rescued and protected a fourteen-year-old German girl, Mary Schwandt, after she was taken captive during the Dakota War of 1862. She was reunited with Mary Schwandt Schmidt in 1894, leading to a feature article in the St. Paul Pioneer Press. Snana’s narrative of the war, “Narration of a Friendly Sioux,” was edited by historian Return Ira Holcombe and published in 1901.

References

  1. Wingerd, p. 400 n 4.
  2. Satterlee, Marion (1923). Outbreak and massacre by the Dakota Indians in Minnesota in 1862 : Marion P. Satterlee's minute account of the outbreak, with exact locations, names of all victims, prisoners at Camp Release, refugees at Fort Ridgely, etc. : complete list of Indians killed in battle and those hanged, and those pardoned at Rock Island, Iowa : interesting items and anecdotes. Minneapolis, MN: M.P. Satterlee. p. 125. ISBN   978-0-7884-1896-9. OCLC   48682232.
  3. Clodfelter, Micheal D. (2006). The Dakota War: The United States Army Versus the Sioux, 1862-1865. McFarland Publishing. p. 67. ISBN   978-0-7864-2726-0.
  4. "During the War". The US–Dakota War of 1862. August 22, 2012. Archived from the original on November 3, 2012. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  5. Clemmons, Linda (2005). "'We Will Talk of Nothing Else': Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837". Great Plains Quarterly. 186 via Digital Commons – University of Nebrasks@Lincoln.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Carley, Kenneth (1976). The Dakota War of 1862: Minnesota's Other Civil War. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press. ISBN   978-0-87351-392-0.
  7. "Minnesota Territory, 1857". The US–Dakota War of 1862. September 2, 2012. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  8. 1 2 3 Mary Lethert Wingerd, North Country: The Making of Minnesota (2010) p. 302.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Anderson, Gary Clayton (1986). Little Crow: Spokesman for the Sioux. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press. ISBN   0-87351-196-4.
  10. "The Acton Incident". The US–Dakota War of 1862. February 27, 2013. Archived from the original on February 22, 2015. Retrieved July 17, 2021.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Anderson, Gary Clayton (2019). Massacre in Minnesota: The Dakota War of 1862, the Most Violent Ethnic Conflict in American History. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN   978-0-8061-6434-2
  12. "During the War". The US–Dakota War of 1862. August 22, 2012. Archived from the original on November 3, 2012. Retrieved July 30, 2021.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Brown, Samuel J. (1897). "Chapter IX, Narrative 1 (Samuel J. Brown's Recollections)". Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press (published 1988). pp. 222–223, 225. ISBN   978-0-87351-216-9.
  14. Wingerd, North Country (2010) p. 400 n 4.
  15. 1 2 "Camp Release". The US-Dakota War of 1862. July 13, 2012. Archived from the original on August 5, 2020. Retrieved May 16, 2021.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 Monjeau-Marz, Corinne L. (October 10, 2005). Dakota Indian Internment at Fort Snelling, 1862–1864. Prairie Smoke Press. pp. 9, 30, 37, 57. ISBN   978-0-9772718-1-8.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Anderson, Gary Clayton; Woolworth, Alan R., eds. (1988). Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press. pp. 2, 4, 120, 141, 268. ISBN   978-0-87351-216-9.
  18. 1 2 Carley, Kenneth (1976). The Dakota War of 1862: Minnesota's Other Civil War. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press. p. 62. ISBN   978-0-87351-392-0.
  19. "Ho-Chunk and Blue Earth, 1855–1863". MNopedia. September 30, 2021. Retrieved September 30, 2021.
  20. Nelson, Emma (August 16, 2012). "Dayton repudiates Ramsey's call to exterminate Dakota". MN Daily. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
  21. 1 2 "Dayton repudiates Ramsey's call to exterminate Dakota". Star Tribune. May 2, 2013. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
  22. 1 2 3 "Dakota Governor Walz makes historic apology for 1862 mass hanging in Mankato". Indian Country Today. January 2, 2020. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
  23. 1 2 3 "MNHS Transfers Portion of Lower Sioux Historic Site Back to the Lower Sioux Indian Community". Minnesota Historical Society. February 5, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
  24. 1 2 3 Carley, Kenneth (1976). The Sioux Uprising of 1862 (2nd ed.). Minnesota Historical Society. ISBN   978-0873511032.
  25. Gary Clayton Anderson, Massacre in Minnesota(2019) pp 31–32, 50.
  26. 1 2 Day, George E.H. (January 1, 1862). "Report on Indian affairs in Minnesota". Abraham Lincoln Papers at the Library of Congress, Manuscript Division. Washington DC. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  27. Reminiscences of Little Crow, An address at the Annual Meeting of the Minnesota Historical Society, DR. ASA W. DANIELS, January 21, 1907, Library of Congress
  28. Douglas S. Benson (1996). Presidents at War: A Survey of United States Warfare History in Presidential Sequence 1775-1980. p. 328.
  29. "Thompson, Clark Wallace," MNOPEDIA Minnesota Historical Society, Colin Mustful, July 2019
  30. Dillon, Richard H. (1920). North American Indian Wars. City: Booksales. p. 126.
  31. Michno, Gregory (November 5, 2012). "10 Myths on the Dakota Uprising". (2012). True West Magazine. Archived from the original on March 13, 2013.
  32. Anderson, Gary (1983). "Myrick's Insult: A fresh look at Myth and Reality" (PDF). Minnesota History . Minnesota Historical Society. 48 (5): 198–206. JSTOR   20178811. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 10, 2015. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
  33. Letter from Little Crow to Col. Henry Sibley(September 7, 1862) AG Report, 35-36
  34. "Timeline". Minnesota Historical Society (U.S.-Dakota War of 1862). March 12, 2012. Retrieved October 4, 2020.
  35. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Wingerd, Mary Lethert (2010). North Country: The Making of Minnesota. Delegard, Kirsten. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN   9781452942605. OCLC   670429639.
  36. "Taoqateduta Is Not a Coward" (PDF). Minnesota Historical Society. September 1962. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
  37. 1 2 3 4 "479: Little War on the Prairie". This American Life. April 15, 2018. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
  38. 1 2 3 4 5 Folwell, William Watts (1921). A History of Minnesota. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society. ISBN   978-0-87351-392-0.
  39. Anderson, Little Crow, 130-39; Schultz, Over the Earth I Come, 48-58; Heard, History of the Sioux War, 73; Board of Commissioners, Minnesota in the Civil War, 2:112-14, 166-81.
  40. Nixon, Barbara (2012). Mi' Taku'ye-oyasin : Letters from Wounded Knee : the native American Holocaust. [Bloomington, Indiana]. p. 81. ISBN   978-1-4653-5391-7.
  41. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Big Eagle, Jerome; Holcombe, Return Ira (July 1, 1894). "A Sioux Story of the War: Chief Big Eagle's Story of the Sioux Outbreak of 1862". St. Paul Pioneer Press.
  42. Bishop, Harriet E. (1864). Dakota War Whoop: Indian Massacres and War in Minnesota, 1862–3. Saint Paul: William J. Moses' Press.
  43. Diedrich, Mark (1995). Old Betsey: The Life and Times of a Famous Dakota Woman and Her Family. Rochester, New York: Coyote Books. p. 61. ISBN   9780961690199.
  44. 1 2 3 4 Zeman, Carrie Reber; Derounian-Stodola, Kathryn Zabelle, eds. (2012). A Thrilling Narrative of Indian Captivity: Dispatches from the Dakota War. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 66, 274, 300. ISBN   978-0-8032-3530-4.
  45. Burnham, Frederick Russell (1926). Scouting on Two Continents. New York: Doubleday, Page and Co. p. 2 (autobiographical account). ASIN B000F1UKOA.
  46. Soldiers: 3 killed/13 wounded; Lakota: 2 known dead.
  47. "Ft. Rid". The Dakota Conflict of 1862: Battles. Mankato Chamber of Commerce. Archived from the original on October 5, 2006. Retrieved April 6, 2007.
  48. 1 2 3 4 Folwell, William Watts (1921). A History of Minnesota. Saint Paul: Minnesota Historical Society. pp. 149–150, 390–391.
  49. Carley, Kenneth (1976). The Dakota War of 1862: Minnesota's Other Civil War. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press. pp. 26, 31. ISBN   978-0-87351-392-0.
  50. Flandrau, Charles E. (1890–93). "Roster of Citizens Engaged in the Sioux Indian War of 1862". In Minnesota Board of Commissioners on Publication of History of Minnesota in Civil and Indian Wars; Flandrau, Charles E. (eds.). Minnesota in the civil and Indian wars 1861-1865. St. Paul, Minn.: Printed for the state by the Pioneer Press Co. pp. 754–816.
  51. Flandrau, Charles E. (1900). Encyclopedia of Biography of Minnesota. Salem, Mass.: Higginson Book Co.
  52. Rogers, Leah D. (2009). "Fort Madison, 1808-1813". In William E. Whittaker (ed.). Frontier Forts of Iowa: Indians, Traders, and Soldiers, 1682–1862. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. pp. 193–206. ISBN   978-1-58729-831-8.
  53. McKusick, Marshall B. (1975). The Iowa Northern Border Brigade. Iowa City, Iowa: Office of the State Archaeologist, The University of Iowa.
  54. 1 2 3 4 5 Johnson, Charles W. (1890–93). "Narrative of the Sixth Regiment". In Minnesota Board of Commissioners on Publication of History of Minnesota in Civil and Indian Wars; Flandrau, Charles E. (eds.). Minnesota in the Civil and Indian Wars, 1861–1865. St. Paul, Minn.: Printed for the state by the Pioneer Press Co. pp. 300–346.
  55. Anderson, Joseph (August 9, 1894). Letter to Dr. Jared W. Daniels. Transcribed by Anne C. Anderson.
  56. Anderson, Gary Clayton (2019). Massacre in Minnesota: The Dakota War of 1862, the Most Violent Ethnic Conflict in American History. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 179–180. ISBN   978-0-8061-6434-2.
  57. 1 2 Noyes, Edward (Winter 1979). "Neighbors to the Rescue" (PDF). Minnesota History. 46 (8): 312–327 via Minnesota Historical Society Collections.
  58. "History – Minnesota Infantry (Part 2)". Union Regimental Histories (from "A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion" by Frederick H. Dyer). The Civil War Archive. Retrieved May 7, 2011.
  59. Minn Board of Commissioners (October 2005). Andrews, C. C. (ed.). Minnesota in the Civil and Indian Wars, 1861-1865: Two Volume Set with Index. Minnesota Historical Society. ISBN   978-0-87351-519-1 . Retrieved May 7, 2011.
  60. 1 2 Andrews, C.C. (1890–1893). "Narrative of the Third Regiment". In Minnesota Board of Commissioners on Publication of History of Minnesota in Civil and Indian Wars; Flandrau, Charles E. (eds.). Minnesota in the Civil and Indian Wars 1861–1865. St. Paul, Minn.: Printed for the state by the Pioneer Press Co. pp. 147–197.
  61. 1 2 3 4 Woolworth, Alan R. "Minnesota's State War and the Battle of Wood Lake, September 23, 1862". Wood Lake Battlefield Preservation Association. Archived from the original on November 29, 2020. Retrieved June 20, 2021.
  62. 1 2 Robertson, Thomas A. (1917). "Chapter IX, Narrative 2 (Thomas A. Robertson's Reminiscences)". Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press (published 1988). p. 229. ISBN   978-0-87351-216-9.
  63. Renville, Gabriel (1905). "A Sioux Narrative of the Outbreak of 1862, and of Sibley's Expedition of 1863". Minnesota Collections. 10: 595–613.
  64. 1 2 Two Stars, Solomon (1901). "Chapter IX, Narrative 7 (Solomon Two Stars's Testimony)". Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press (published 1988). pp. 241–244. ISBN   978-0-87351-216-9.
  65. 1 2 Champlin, Ezra T. (September 1, 1886). "Battle of Wood Lake". In Buck, Daniel (ed.). Indian Outbreaks. Mankato, Minn. (published 1904).
  66. 1 2 Minnesota Commission on the Wood Lake Battlefield (1907–1908). "Report on the Battle of Wood Lake" (PDF). Minnesota Historical Society. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 15, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2021.
  67. 1 2 Minnesota Board of Commissioners on Publication of History of Minnesota in Civil and Indian Wars; Flandrau, Charles E., eds. (1890–1893). "Narrative of the Seventh Regiment". Minnesota in the Civil and Indian Wars, 1861–1865. St. Paul, Minn.: Printed for the state by the Pioneer Press Co.
  68. Appletons' annual cyclopaedia and register of important events of the year: 1862. New York: D. Appleton & Company. 1863. p. 588.
  69. 1 2 3 Clodfelter, Micheal (1998). The Dakota War: The United States Army Versus the Sioux, 1862–1865. Jefferson, North Carolina and London: McFarland & Company. ISBN   0-7864-2726-4.
  70. 1 2 "17. Did the Minnesota Historical Society display the remains of Taoyateduta (Little Crow) at the Minnesota State Capitol?". The US–Dakota War of 1862. May 8, 2012. Archived from the original on June 12, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  71. 1 2 3 "Little Crow's Legacy". Star Tribune. Minneapolis, Minnesota. August 17, 2012. p. A8. Retrieved July 17, 2022.
  72. 1 2 3 4 5 Chomsky, Carol (1990). "The United States-Dakota War Trials: A Study in Military Injustice". Stanford Law Review. University of Minnesota Law School. Archived from the original on July 21, 2017. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
  73. Lincoln, Abraham (November 10, 1862). To John Pope. Wildside Press, LLC. p. 493. ISBN   978-1-4344-7707-1.
  74. "History Matters". Minnesota Historical Society. March–April 2008. p. 1.
  75. Abraham Lincoln (October 30, 2008). The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. Wildside Press LLC. p.  493. ISBN   978-1-4344-7707-1.
  76. Lincoln, Abraham (December 11, 1862). "Message to the Senate Responding to the Resolution Regarding Indian Barbarities in the State of Minnesota". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved December 26, 2018.
  77. 1 2 3 Lincoln and the Hanging of 38 Sioux, 1862, American History: Western Exploration & Native Americans, Bad Ideas, JF Ptak Science Books LLC, John F. Ptak
  78. 9th Regiment, Minnesota Infantry, The Civil War - Battle Unit Details, Union Minnesota Volunteers, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior website
  79. 10th Regiment, Minnesota Infantry, The Civil War - Battle Unit Details, Union Minnesota Volunteers, National Park Service, Department of Interior website
  80. "Human Remains from Mankato, MN in the Possession of the Public Museum of Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI". National Park Service. April 8, 2000. Retrieved April 28, 2007.
  81. 1 2 Folwell, William (1921). A History of Minnesota. Vol. 2. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society. pp. 443–450.
  82. "Civil War Military Units from Minnesota: Hatch's Independent Battalion". Gale Family Library – Minnesota Historical Society. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  83. Winks, Robin W. (1960). The Civil War Years: Canada and the United States, Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Press, 1960, p. 174.
  84. 1 2 Clapesattle, Helen (1969). The Doctors Mayo. Rochester, MN: Mayo Clinic; 2nd edition. ISBN   978-5-555-50282-7.
  85. McKinney, Matt (September 19, 2018). "In hopes of healing, Mayo created a scholarship as apology for misuse of Dakota leader's body". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved January 5, 2021.
  86. "Dakota Wars, Then and Now" (PDF). Nightfall. No. 7. September 5, 2017. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 27, 2020. Retrieved January 5, 2021.
  87. "The Two Sides of Camp McClellan". Davenport Public Library. Archived from the original on April 30, 2012. Retrieved June 4, 2012.
  88. Canku, Clifford. (2013). The Dakota prisoner of war letters = Dakota Kaŝkapi Okicize Wowapi. St. Paul, MN. ISBN   978-0-87351-873-4. OCLC   824670892.
  89. 1 2 Gaul, Alma. "Part 2: Letters reveal spectrum of life at Dakota prison camp". The Quad-City Times. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
  90. 1 2 3 Carlson, Sarah-Eva (July 1, 2004). "They Tell Their Story: the Dakota Internment at Camp McClellan in Davenport, 1862-1866". The Annals of Iowa. 63 (3): 251–278. doi: 10.17077/0003-4827.10819 . ISSN   0003-4827.
  91. 1 2 3 4 Clemmons, Linda M. (April 1, 2018). ""The young folks [want] to go in and see the Indians": Davenport Citizens, Protestant Missionaries, and Dakota Prisoners of War, 1863–1866". The Annals of Iowa. 77 (2): 121–150. doi: 10.17077/0003-4827.12499 . ISSN   0003-4827.
  92. Routel, Colette (2013). "Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The U.S.-Dakota War". William Mitchell Law Review . Mitchell Hamline School of Law. 40 (1). Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  93. "Where the Water Reflects the Past". The Saint Paul Foundation. October 31, 2005. Retrieved December 12, 2006.[ dead link ]
  94. "Family History". Census of Dakota Indians Interned at Fort Snelling After the Dakota War in 1862. Minnesota Historical Society. 2006. Archived from the original on February 20, 2007. Retrieved December 12, 2006.
  95. "Exile". The US-Dakota War of 1862. June 8, 2021. Archived from the original on January 8, 2014. Retrieved February 3, 2021..
  96. 1 2 Carley, Kenneth (September 1962). "As Red Men Viewed It: Three Indian Accounts of the Uprising". Minnesota History. 38 (3): 126–127. JSTOR   20176459.
  97. Denial, Catherine J. (Spring 2013). "Review — A Thrilling Narrative of Indian Captivity: Dispatches from the Dakota War". Minnesota History. 63 (5): 213. JSTOR   43492609.
  98. Kunnen-Jones, Marianne (August 21, 2002). "Anniversary Volume Gives New Voice To Pioneer Accounts of Sioux Uprising". University of Cincinnati. Archived from the original on June 19, 2008. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  99. Lass, William E. (Summer 2012). "Histories of the U.S.–Dakota War of 1862". Minnesota History. 63 (2): 44–51. JSTOR   41704992.
  100. Edmunds, R. David (Fall 1988). "Book Reviews – Through Dakota Eyes: Narrative Accounts of the Minnesota Indian War of 1862". Minnesota History. 51 (3): 123. JSTOR   20179110.
  101. 1 2 Bryant, Charles S.; Abel B. Murch (1864). A history of the great massacre by the Sioux Indians in Minnesota : including the personal narratives of many who escaped. Chicago: O.C. Gibbs. ISBN   978-1-147-00747-3.
  102. 1 2 Switzer, C. DeForest (August 23, 2016). "Siouxland Observer: Exiled: The Northwest Tribes". Siouxland Observer. Archived from the original on December 2, 2017. Retrieved March 8, 2021.
  103. "Riverfront Eyewitness". Google Docs.
  104. Steil, Mark (September 26, 2002). "Exiled at Crow Creek". Minnesota Public Radio. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2018.
  105. "Let Them Eat Grass". YouTube . Archived from the original on November 18, 2021.
  106. 1 2 3 Routel, Colette (2013). "Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The U.S.-Dakota War". 40 William Mitchell Law Review 1. Mitchell Hamline School of Law: 21, 24.
  107. "Bounties". The US-Dakota War of 1862. June 8, 2021. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved June 8, 2021.
  108. Mark Steil & Tim Post (September 26, 2002). Minnesota's Uncivil War (Minnesota Public Radio). Minneapolis-St. Paul: KNOW-FM. Remnants of war.
  109. 1 2 3 Calhoun, Jake (October 23, 2016). "After more than 150 years, New Ulm Battery still one-of-a-kind". The Journal . New Ulm, MN. Retrieved January 27, 2021.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  110. 1 2 Pugmire, Tim (August 16, 2012). "Gov. Dayton repudiates actions by Gov. Ramsey, 150 years later". MPR. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
  111. "Lower Sioux Indian Community To Get Ancestral Land Back From Minnesota, MN Historical Society". WCCO-TV. February 4, 2021. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
  112. 1 2 3 Smith, Kelly (February 20, 2021). "In an unprecedented step, Minnesota returns 114 acres to Lower Sioux Indian Community". Star Tribune. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
  113. 1 2 3 "Camp Release State Monument". HMdb.org – The Historical Marker Database. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2021.
  114. "Wood Lake Battlefield State Monument". HMdb.org — The Historical Marker Database. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
  115. "Wood Lake Battlefield". West Central Tribune. September 15, 2012. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
  116. "Birch Coulee Battlefield". Minnesota Historical Society. Archived from the original on March 3, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
  117. "Birch Coulee State Monument". HMdb.org — The Historical Marker Database. Archived from the original on October 19, 2020. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
  118. Guerry, Matthew (September 11, 2020). "Groups say Birch Coulee Battle Monuments in Minnesota are worth preserving, but by who?". Post Bulletin. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
  119. "Fort Ridgely State Monument". HMdb.org — The Historical Marker Database. Retrieved January 29, 2022.
  120. "Henderson Monument". HMdb.org — The Historical Marker Database. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  121. "Henderson Monument, photo by Jan Klein". Family and Friends of Dakota Uprising Victims. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  122. "Radnor Earle Monument, photo by Curt Dahlin". Family and Friends of Dakota Uprising Victims. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
  123. 1 2 3 4 5 "Monuments Depicting Victims of the Dakota Uprising". Family and Friends of Dakota Uprising Victims. Retrieved March 15, 2022.
  124. "Schwandt State Monument". HMdb.org – The Historical Marker Database. June 16, 2016. Retrieved March 15, 2022.
  125. 1 2 Curtiss-Wedge, Franklin (1916). The History of Renville County, Minnesota. Chicago: H.C. Cooper, Jr. & Co. p. 1343 via Internet Archive.
  126. Holcombe, Return Ira (1902). Sketches, historical and descriptive, of the monuments and tablets, erected by the Minnesota Valley historical society in Renville and Redwood counties, Minnesota. Morton, Minnesota: Minnesota Valley Historical Society. p. 28 via Hathi Trust.
  127. Babcock, Willoughby M. (March 1930). "The Problem of Historic Markers and Monuments in Minnesota". Minnesota History. 11 (1): 29 via Internet Archive.
  128. "Defenders State Monument". HMdb.org – The Historial Marker Database. June 7, 2021. Retrieved March 17, 2022.
  129. 1 2 3 Legg, John (July 26, 2020). "Mankato's Hanging Monument Excluded Indigenous Perspectives when it was Erected and when it was Removed". History News Network – Columbian College of Arts & Sciences, The George Washington University. Retrieved April 6, 2022.
  130. 1 2 3 4 5 Andrews, Melodie (2010). "The U.S. Dakota War in Public Memory and Public Space: Mankato's Journey Toward Reconciliation". In Atkins, Annette; Miller, Deborah L. (eds.). The State We're In: Reflections on Minnesota History. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press. pp. 52–58. ISBN   9780873518024.
  131. 1 2 Linehan, Dan (May 14, 2006). "Students search for missing monument". Mankato Free Press. Archived from the original on April 6, 2022. Retrieved April 6, 2022.
  132. 1 2 "Reconciliation Park". MankatoLIFE. Retrieved April 6, 2022.
  133. "Memorial to 38 hanged Dakota warriors unveiled in Mankato". The Winona Daily News. December 27, 2012. pp. A1, A3. Retrieved April 6, 2022 via Newspapers.com.
  134. "Acton State Monument". HMdb.org – The Historical Marker Database. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  135. "The Acton Incident". HMdb.org – The Historical Marker Database. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
  136. "Little Crow (Taoyateduta)". Meeker County. Retrieved June 30, 2021.
  137. Barry, Paul. "Reconciliation – Healing and Remembering". Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved September 6, 2011.
  138. Tim Krohn, "38 Dakota honored by riders, runners", The Free Press, Mankato, MN, 12/26/2018; Retrieved 5-7-2019.
  139. Farber, Stephen (November 18, 1973). "Movies". The New York Times . Retrieved November 28, 2016.
  140. "One Poem By Layli Long Soldier". Mud City Journal. Archived from the original on August 8, 2018. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
  141. Diaz, Natalie (August 4, 2017). "A Native American Poet Excavates the Language of Occupation". The New York Times . Retrieved August 7, 2018.
  142. Helbling, Audrey Kletscher (May 21, 2012). "A Minnesota politician and writer shares his insights on 'The Dakota War, a Clash of Cultures'". MinnPost . Retrieved December 31, 2020.
  143. Herrera, Allison (May 9, 2012). "Healing Minnesota's Deepest Wound: Pardoning a Dakota Warrior" . Retrieved December 31, 2020.
  144. The Past Is Alive Within Us: The U.S.- Dakota Conflict. Twin Cities PBS (Motion picture). December 26, 2013. Retrieved December 31, 2020.
  145. "Dakota 38". Smooth Feather Productions. 2012. Retrieved December 31, 2020.
  146. "Watch Dakota 38 Documentary, Remember Those Lost 150 Years Ago". Indian Country Today . December 22, 2012. Retrieved December 31, 2020.
  147. "'Dakota 38' film to be shown at ND Heritage Center". Minot Daily News . December 21, 2019. Retrieved December 31, 2020.

Further reading

Primary sources

Historiography and memory