John Taylor | |
---|---|
Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs | |
In office 2001–2005 | |
President | George W. Bush |
Preceded by | Timothy Geithner |
Succeeded by | Timothy D. Adams |
Personal details | |
Born | John Brian Taylor December 8,1946 Yonkers,New York,U.S. |
Political party | Republican |
Education | Princeton University (BA) Stanford University (PhD) |
Academic career | |
Field | Monetary economics |
Institutions | Stanford University Hoover Institution Columbia University |
School or tradition | New Keynesian economics |
Doctoral advisor | Theodore Wilbur Anderson [1] |
Doctoral students | Lawrence J. Christiano |
Influences | Milton Friedman Paul Volcker E. Philip Howrey Alan Greenspan |
Contributions | Taylor rule |
Information at IDEAS / RePEc | |
John Brian Taylor (born December 8,1946) is the Mary and Robert Raymond Professor of Economics at Stanford University,and the George P. Shultz Senior Fellow in Economics at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. [2]
He taught at Columbia University from 1973 to 1980 and the Woodrow Wilson School and Economics Department of Princeton University from 1980 to 1984 before returning to Stanford. He has received several teaching prizes and teaches Stanford's introductory economics course as well as PhD courses in monetary economics. [3]
In research published in 1979 and 1980 he developed a model of price and wage setting—called the staggered contract model—which served as an underpinning of a new class of empirical models with rational expectations and sticky prices—sometimes called new Keynesian models. [4] [5] In a 1993 paper he proposed the Taylor rule, [6] intended as a recommendation about how nominal interest rates should be determined,which then became a rough summary of how central banks actually do set them. He has been active in public policy,serving as the Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs during the first term of the George W. Bush administration. His book Global Financial Warriors chronicles this period. [7] He was a member of the President's Council of Economic Advisors during the George H. W. Bush administration and Senior Economist at the Council of Economic Advisors during the Ford and Carter administrations.
In 2012 he was included in the 50 Most Influential list of Bloomberg Markets Magazine. Thomson Reuters lists Taylor among the "citation laureates" who are likely future winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics. [8] He was president of the Mont Pelerin Society from 2018 to 2020. [9]
Born in Yonkers,New York,Taylor graduated from Shady Side Academy [10] and earned his AB in economics from Princeton University in 1968 after completing a senior thesis titled "Fiscal and Monetary Stabilization Policies in a Model of Cyclical Growth". [11] He then earned his PhD in economics from Stanford University in 1973.
Taylor's research—including the staggered contract model,the Taylor rule,and the construction of a policy tradeoff (Taylor) curve [12] employing empirical rational expectations models [13] —has had a major impact on economic theory and policy. [14] Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has said that Taylor's “influence on monetary theory and policy has been profound,” [15] and Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen has noted that Taylor's work “has affected the way policymakers and economists analyze the economy and approach monetary policy." [16]
Taylor contributed to the development of mathematical methods for solving macroeconomic models under the assumption of rational expectations,including in a 1975 Journal of Political Economy paper,in which he showed how gradual learning could be incorporated in models with rational expectations; [17] a 1979 Econometrica paper in which he presented one of the first econometric models with overlapping price setting and rational expectations, [18] which he later expanded into a large multicountry model in a 1993 book Macroeconomic Policy in a World Economy, [13] and a 1983 Econometrica paper, [19] in which he developed with Ray Fair the first algorithm to solve large-scale dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models which became part of popular solution programs such as Dynare and EViews. [20]
In 1977,Taylor and Edmund Phelps,simultaneously with Stanley Fischer,showed that monetary policy is useful for stabilizing the economy if prices or wages are sticky,even when all workers and firms have rational expectations. [21] This demonstrated that some of the earlier insights of Keynesian economics remained true under rational expectations. This was important because Thomas Sargent and Neil Wallace had argued that rational expectations would make macroeconomic policy useless for stabilization; [22] the results of Taylor,Phelps,and Fischer showed that Sargent and Wallace's crucial assumption was not rational expectations,but perfectly flexible prices. [23] These research projects together could considerably deepen our understanding of the limits of the policy-ineffectiveness proposition. [24]
Taylor then developed the staggered contract model of overlapping wage and price setting,which became one of the building blocks of the New Keynesian macroeconomics that rebuilt much of the traditional macromodel on rational expectations microfoundations. [25] [26]
Taylor's research on monetary policy rules traces back to his undergraduate studies at Princeton. [27] [28] He went on in the 1970s and 1980s to explore what types of monetary policy rules would most effectively reduce the social costs of inflation and business cycle fluctuations:should central banks try to control the money supply,the price level,or the interest rate;and should these instruments react to changes in output,unemployment,asset prices,or inflation rates? He showed [29] that there was a tradeoff—later called the Taylor curve [30] —between the volatility of inflation and that of output. Taylor's 1993 paper in the Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy proposed that a simple and effective central bank policy would manipulate short-term interest rates,raising rates to cool the economy whenever inflation or output growth becomes excessive,and lowering rates when either one falls too low. [6] Taylor's interest rate equation has come to be known as the Taylor rule ,and it is now widely accepted as an effective formula for monetary decision making. [31]
A key stipulation of the Taylor rule,sometimes called the Taylor principle, [32] is that the nominal interest rate should increase by more than one percentage point for each one-percent rise in inflation. Some empirical estimates indicate that many central banks today act approximately as the Taylor rule prescribes,but violated the Taylor principle during the inflationary spiral of the 1970s. [33]
Taylor's recent research has been on the financial crisis that began in 2007 and the world economic recession. He finds that the crisis was primarily caused by flawed macroeconomic policies from the U.S. government and other governments. Particularly,he focuses on the Federal Reserve which,under Alan Greenspan,a personal friend of Taylor,created "monetary excesses" in which interest rates were kept too low for too long,which then directly led to the housing boom in his opinion. [34] He also believes that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae spurred on the boom and that the crisis was misdiagnosed as a liquidity rather than a credit risk problem. [35] He wrote that,"government actions and interventions,not any inherent failure or instability of the private economy,caused,prolonged,and worsen the crisis." [36]
Taylor's research has also examined the impact of fiscal policy in the recent recession. In November 2008,writing for The Wall Street Journal opinion section,he recommended four measures to fight the economic downturn:(a) permanently keeping all income tax rates the same,(b) permanently creating a worker's tax credit equal to 6.2 percent of wages up to $8,000,(c) incorporating "automatic stabilizers" as part of overall fiscal plans,and (d) enacting a short-term stimulus plan that also meets long-term objectives against waste and inefficiency. He stated that merely temporary tax cuts would not serve as a good policy tool. [37] His research [38] with John Cogan,Tobias Cwik,and Volcker Wieland showed that the multiplier is much smaller in new Keynesian than in old Keynesian models,a result that was confirmed by researchers at central banks. [39] He evaluated the 2008 and 2009 stimulus packages and argued that they were not effective in stimulating the economy. [40]
In a June 2011 interview on Bloomberg Television,Taylor stressed the importance of long term fiscal reform that sets the U.S. federal budget on a path towards being balanced. He cautioned that the Fed should move away from quantitative easing measures and keep to a more static,stable monetary policy. He also criticized fellow economist Paul Krugman's advocacy of additional stimulus programs from Congress,which Taylor said will not help in the long run. [41] In his 2012 book First Principles:Five Keys to Restoring America’s Prosperity,he endeavors to explain why these reforms are part of a broader set of principles of economic freedom.
Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that deals with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole. This includes regional, national, and global economies. Macroeconomists study topics such as output/GDP and national income, unemployment, price indices and inflation, consumption, saving, investment, energy, international trade, and international finance.
The IS–LM model, or Hicks–Hansen model, is a two-dimensional macroeconomic model which is used as a pedagogical tool in macroeconomic teaching. The IS–LM model shows the relationship between interest rates and output in the short run in a closed economy. The intersection of the "investment–saving" (IS) and "liquidity preference–money supply" (LM) curves illustrates a "general equilibrium" where supposed simultaneous equilibria occur in both the goods and the money markets. The IS–LM model shows the importance of various demand shocks on output and consequently offers an explanation of changes in national income in the short run when prices are fixed or sticky. Hence, the model can be used as a tool to suggest potential levels for appropriate stabilisation policies. It is also used as a building block for the demand side of the economy in more comprehensive models like the AD–AS model.
New Keynesian economics is a school of macroeconomics that strives to provide microeconomic foundations for Keynesian economics. It developed partly as a response to criticisms of Keynesian macroeconomics by adherents of new classical macroeconomics.
Monetary economics is the branch of economics that studies the different theories of money: it provides a framework for analyzing money and considers its functions, and it considers how money can gain acceptance purely because of its convenience as a public good. The discipline has historically prefigured, and remains integrally linked to, macroeconomics. This branch also examines the effects of monetary systems, including regulation of money and associated financial institutions and international aspects.
In economics, nominal rigidity, also known as price-stickiness or wage-stickiness, is a situation in which a nominal price is resistant to change. Complete nominal rigidity occurs when a price is fixed in nominal terms for a relevant period of time. For example, the price of a particular good might be fixed at $10 per unit for a year. Partial nominal rigidity occurs when a price may vary in nominal terms, but not as much as it would if perfectly flexible. For example, in a regulated market there might be limits to how much a price can change in a given year.
The Lucas critique argues that it is naïve to try to predict the effects of a change in economic policy entirely on the basis of relationships observed in historical data, especially highly aggregated historical data. More formally, it states that the decision rules of Keynesian models—such as the consumption function—cannot be considered as structural in the sense of being invariant with respect to changes in government policy variables. It was named after American economist Robert Lucas's work on macroeconomic policymaking.
A macroeconomic model is an analytical tool designed to describe the operation of the problems of economy of a country or a region. These models are usually designed to examine the comparative statics and dynamics of aggregate quantities such as the total amount of goods and services produced, total income earned, the level of employment of productive resources, and the level of prices.
Thomas John Sargent is an American economist and the W.R. Berkley Professor of Economics and Business at New York University. He specializes in the fields of macroeconomics, monetary economics, and time series econometrics. As of 2024, he ranks as the 38th most cited economist in the world. He was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 2011 together with Christopher A. Sims for their "empirical research on cause and effect in the macroeconomy".
Edmund Strother Phelps is an American economist and the recipient of the 2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.
The policy-ineffectiveness proposition (PIP) is a new classical theory proposed in 1975 by Thomas J. Sargent and Neil Wallace based upon the theory of rational expectations, which posits that monetary policy cannot systematically manage the levels of output and employment in the economy.
Christopher Albert Sims is an American econometrician and macroeconomist. He is currently the John J.F. Sherrerd '52 University Professor of Economics at Princeton University. Together with Thomas Sargent, he won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2011. The award cited their "empirical research on cause and effect in the macroeconomy".
Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium modeling is a macroeconomic method which is often employed by monetary and fiscal authorities for policy analysis, explaining historical time-series data, as well as future forecasting purposes. DSGE econometric modelling applies general equilibrium theory and microeconomic principles in a tractable manner to postulate economic phenomena, such as economic growth and business cycles, as well as policy effects and market shocks.
Michael Dean Woodford is an American macroeconomist and monetary theorist who currently teaches at Columbia University.
Guillermo Antonio Calvo is an Argentine-American economist who is director of Columbia University's mid-career Program in Economic Policy Management in their School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA).
The neoclassical synthesis (NCS), or neoclassical–Keynesian synthesis is an academic movement and paradigm in economics that worked towards reconciling the macroeconomic thought of John Maynard Keynes in his book The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936) with neoclassical economics.
New classical macroeconomics, sometimes simply called new classical economics, is a school of thought in macroeconomics that builds its analysis entirely on a neoclassical framework. Specifically, it emphasizes the importance of rigorous foundations based on microeconomics, especially rational expectations.
Macroeconomic theory has its origins in the study of business cycles and monetary theory. In general, early theorists believed monetary factors could not affect real factors such as real output. John Maynard Keynes attacked some of these "classical" theories and produced a general theory that described the whole economy in terms of aggregates rather than individual, microeconomic parts. Attempting to explain unemployment and recessions, he noticed the tendency for people and businesses to hoard cash and avoid investment during a recession. He argued that this invalidated the assumptions of classical economists who thought that markets always clear, leaving no surplus of goods and no willing labor left idle.
Neil Wallace is an American economist and professor of economics at Penn State University. He is considered one of the main proponents of new classical macroeconomics in the field of economics.
The new neoclassical synthesis (NNS), which is occasionally referred as the New Consensus, is the fusion of the major, modern macroeconomic schools of thought – new classical macroeconomics/real business cycle theory and early New Keynesian economics – into a consensus view on the best way to explain short-run fluctuations in the economy. This new synthesis is analogous to the neoclassical synthesis that combined neoclassical economics with Keynesian macroeconomics. The new synthesis provides the theoretical foundation for much of contemporary mainstream macroeconomics. It is an important part of the theoretical foundation for the work done by the Federal Reserve and many other central banks.
Leonardo Auernheimer was an Argentine economist, professor, and international monetary consultant.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help){{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires |journal=
(help)