Lakulisa Mathura Pillar Inscription

Last updated

Lakulisa Mathura Pillar Inscription
Mathura Pillar Inscription of Chandragupta II Gupta Era 61.jpg
MaterialStone
WritingSanskrit, Gupta script
Created380 CE
Period/culture Gupta Empire era
Discovered Mathura, Uttar Pradesh
Present location Mathura Museum, Madhya Pradesh
Mathura (India)

The Lakulisa Mathura Pillar Inscription is a 4th-century CE Sanskrit inscription in early Gupta script related to the Shaivism tradition of Hinduism. [1] [2] [3] Discovered near a Mathura well in north India, the damaged inscription is one of the earliest evidences of murti (statue) consecration in a temple made to celebrate gurus (preceptors, gurvayatane). It is, according to the Indologist Michael Willis, crucial to understanding the "history of Pashupata Shaivism" and a floruit for the antiquity of its practices. [3] The Lakulisha Mathura inscription is one of the earliest epigraphical evidence of a developed Shaiva initiation tradition. [4] [note 1]

Contents

Description

The inscription was found in 1928 on the central section of a pillar attached to a well in Chandul Mandul Bagichi, Mathura, not far from a Hindu temple dedicated to Shiva. After its discovery, an antique dealer removed it and put it in his house. The locals complained and the pillar was seized by the police, from where it arrived in the Mathura Museum in 1929. In 1931, Sastri made the first copies of the inscription and in 1932, Bhandarkar published the inscription along with his analysis. [5] [6]

The Lakulisha Mathura pillar inscription consists of horizontal lines across five zones of the pilaster over about 2.25 feet (0.69 m) by 1.5 feet (0.46 m) surface area. The pillar's top and bottom sections are squares, the middle is an octagon. [7] The pillar is smooth on just one top face, one bottom face and five of the eight middle faces. All the remaining surfaces are rough, which led Bhandarkar to propose that this pillar was probably a part of a temple shrine pilaster that was demolished and cut out for some other use. [7] [note 2] The piece somehow reached a well in Mathura. The smooth top face has a carving that shows a trident (trisula), while the bottom face also has a sculpture that shows a nude male likely Lakulisha, which together confirm that the pillar is related to Shaivism tradition of Hinduism. The middle part of the pillar has the inscription. Of the five smooth faces, the middle zone is damaged, which likely contained the most important part of the inscription with significant historical details. [7] It is unclear if the inscription was added at the time the pilaster was being constructed, or later. According to Bhandarkar the temple with the pilaster already existed before 380 CE, and that the inscription was added on the available space about 380 CE. [7] [6]

The discovered inscription is in Sanskrit in early Gupta script, [5] similar to other early Gupta era inscriptions found near Mathura. [8] D.C. Sircar states that the script is closer to the Middle Brahmi, 2nd-century CE Kushana script. [9] It is in prose, except the last part which is in the Vedic Arya meter. According to Sanskrit prosody rule, that part of the inscription constitutes only the first half of the meter, and the second half is missing or was never engraved. [5]

Given the damaged characters, neither the exact date is known nor whether the "60 and 1" year mentioned in the inscription (61st year) is referring to start or end of that 61st year. Further, the complexity of lunisolar Hindu calendar has added to the confusion. This has led to proposals that date it variously between 379 and 381, with 380 CE more common. [10] [3] [4]

Inscription without interpolation

The inscribed pillar recording the installation of two Shiva Lingas by Udita Acharya in the "year 61 following the era of the Guptas in the reign of Chandragupta Vikramaditya, son of Samudragupta" (380 CE). Rangeshwar Temple. Mathura Museum No. 29.1931. The end of the inscription is visible on the corner to the left. Inscribed Pillar - Recording Installation of Two Shiva Lingas by Udita Acharya in the Reign of Chandragupta Vikramaditya - 380 CE - Rangeshwar Temple - ACCN 29-1931 - Government Museum - Mathura 2013-02-23 5503.JPG
The inscribed pillar recording the installation of two Shiva Lingas by Udita Acharya in the "year 61 following the era of the Guptas in the reign of Chandragupta Vikramaditya, son of Samudragupta" (380 CE). Rangeshwar Temple. Mathura Museum No. 29.1931. The end of the inscription is visible on the corner to the left.

The inscription without any reconstruction and interpolation reads: [6]

siddham bhattarakamaharaja...raja srisamudraguptasa...trasya
bhattarakama...j....rajasricandraguptasya vijarajyasamvatsa
... kalanuvarttamanasamvatsare ekasasthe ....thame sukladivase
pamcamyam asyam purvva.....ga....sikad dasamena bhagavatparasarac
caturthena .......p....vimalasisyasisyena bhagavad....vimalasisyena
aryyodi....caryye.....pu....pyayananimittam gurunam ca
kirtya......rakapilesvarau gurvvayatane guru .... pratisthapito
naitat khyatyarttham abhili....ya..... m...hesvaranam vijnaptix kriyate
sambodhanam ca yathaka...nacaryyanam parigraham iti matva
visanka....pujapuraskara.... parigrahaparipalyam kuryyad iti vijnaptir iti
yas ca kirtyabhidroham kuryy...d yas cabhilikhitam uparyy adho va sa
pamcabhir maha...patakair upapatakais ca samyuktas syat jayati ca
bhagava....... rudradando gra....yako nitya....

– Mathura Lakulisa Pilaster Inscription, 380 CE

Inscription with interpolation and reconstruction

Bhandarkar proposed the following reconstructed inscription: [13]

siddham bhattarakamaharaja(rajadhi)raja srisamudraguptasa(tpu)trasya
bhattarakama[ha](r)[aja-ra]j[adhi]rajasricandraguptasya vijarajyasamvatsa[re pam](came)
[.....] kalanuvarttamanasamvatsare ekasasthe 60 1[....][pra]thame sukladivase
pamcamyam asyam purvva(yam bha)ga(vat-ku)sikad dasamena bhagavatparasarac
caturthena (bhagavat-ka)p(ila)vimalasisyasisyena bhagavad(upamita)vimalasisyena
aryyodi(ta)caryye(na sva)pu(nya)pyayananimittam gurunam ca
kirtya(rttham upamitesva)rakapilesvarau gurvvayatane guru [....] pratisthapito
naitat khyatyarttham abhili(kh)ya(te atha) m(a)hesvaranam vijnaptix kriyate
sambodhanam ca yathaka(le)nacaryyanam parigraham iti matva
visanka(m)pujapuraskara(m) parigrahaparipalyam kuryyad iti vijnaptir iti
yas ca kirtyabhidroham kuryy(a)d yas cabhilikhitam uparyy adho va sa
pamcabhir maha(a)patakair upapatakais ca samyuktas syat jayati ca
bhagava(n dandah) rudradando gra(na)yako nitya(m)

– Reconstructed Mathura Lakulisa Pilaster Inscription, 380 CE

Translation of reconstructed inscription

Bhandarkar translates it as: [13]

Accomplished! In the ..... year — of the victorious reign of the Bhattaraka Maharaja Rajadhiraja, the illustrious Chandragupta, the good son of the Bhattaraka Maharaja Rajadhiraja, the illustrious Samudragupta — on the fifth of the bright half of the First [Ashadha) of the year 61 following the Gupta era.

On this aforesaid (tithi), (the Lingas) Upamitesvara and Kapilesvara (comprising the portraits of) the teachers were installed in the Teachers’ Shrine. Arya Uditacharyya, tenth from the Bhagavat Kusika, fourth from the Bhagavat Parasara, a stainless disciple’s disciple of the Bhagavat Upamita (and] a stainless disciple of the Bhagavat Kapila, for the commemoration of the preceptors and for the augmentation of the religious merit of self.

(It is) not written for my own fame, but for beseeching the worshippers of Maheshvara. And it is an address to (those who are) the Acharyyas for the time being. Thinking them to bo (their own) property, they should preserve, worship, and honour (them) as (their own) property. This is the request. Whosoever will do harm to those memorials or (destroy) the writing above or below, shall be possessed of the five great sins and the five minor sins. And may divine Danda [note 3] be always victorious, whose staff is terrific and who is the foremost leader.

Significance

Detail of early Gupta relief, Lakulisa Mathura Pillar. Inscribed Pillar - Recording Installation of Two Shiva Lingas by Udita Acharya in the Reign of Chandragupta Vikramaditya - 380 CE - Rangeshwar Temple - ACCN 29-1931 - Government Museum - Mathura (detail).jpg
Detail of early Gupta relief, Lakulisa Mathura Pillar.

The inscription mentions Chandragupta II, and is the earliest from the Gupta era that can be confidently established. [16] The inscription mentions two Shaiva gurus found in historic texts of Pashupata Shaivism, namely Upamita and Kapila. It adds that the donor Uditacarya added memorials to both preceptors in an ayatana (temple shrine), thus providing a 4th-century floruit to shrines for gurus. [16] The Lakulisha inscription is also notable for its mention of puja of teachers, because their "souls approximated Shiva after death", states Willis. This is one of the constant and historic premises of moksha (liberation) in yogic Shaivism. [17] This idea and spiritual goal, according to Willis, is also found midst early Vaishnavism. [17]

According to Alexis Sanderson, prior to the 4th-century CE, the existence of devotionalism for Shiva is attested only in various texts whose dating is unclear and best approximated between 200 BCE and 350 CE. [4] These include, for example, the term Sivabhagavatas in the Mahabhasya of Patanjali. [4] The first epigraphic evidence of Shaiva adherents who use guru initiation for spiritual guidance and practice is found, states Sanderson, between 350 and 400 CE, in the form of Lakulisa inscription of Mathura along with the copper plate grants of Maharaja Bhulunda in what is now Bagh (Dhar district) of Madhya Pradesh. [4] The inscription does not use the word Pashupata, nor does it mention Lakulisha, but states Sanderson it "conveys as much by declaring that Uditacarya is the tenth in the teacher-disciple transmission from Bhagavat Kusika, presumably venerated as the source of the lineage". [4]

The Mathura Lakulisa Inscription attests to the existence of a Shaiva temple with an installed linga and an overall Puja tradition in the Gupta era. It provides a floruit of 380 CE for the devotional worship of Shiva in north India. The inscription also confirms the significance of the Lakulisa tradition in north India by the 4th-century, and has been the basis for Bhandarkar's theory that dates Lakulisa to early 2nd-century CE. [3] [18] [4]

Notes

  1. The evidence, however, is not isolated. Seven inscribed copper-plates dated between 370 and 379 CE have been discovered where Maharaja Bhulunda in a kingdom based in what is now Madhya Pradesh makes grants to Shaivism and Shaktism. These plates record his gift of land and him granting a temple [now lost] the right to enjoy, cultivate, and inhabit the temple lands. The king also grants in these copperplates, states Sanderson, a means of support and maintenance of a temple to Matrikas (Shakti mothers) established by a Bhagavat Lokodadhi, who is called a "Pashupata officiant" (pāśupatācārya). [4]
  2. The shape of characters found in the Lakulisha inscription are epigraphically similar to those found in other inscriptions found in the western parts of the Gupta Empire. This narrows the likely original location of this pillar to around Mathura, Haridwar and Mehrauli, with Haridwar the most probable location. [7]
  3. This is identified in Pashupata tradition as an epithet for Lakulisha. [14] However, the danda part is a Bhandarkar-reconstructed part of the inscription, a reconstruction that has been questioned. [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chandragupta II</span> Ruler of Gupta Empire from c. 376 to c. 415

Chandragupta II, also known by his title Vikramaditya, as well as Chandragupta Vikramaditya, was the third ruler of the Gupta Empire in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shaivism</span> Hindu tradition that worships Shiva

Shaivism is one of the major Hindu traditions, which worships Shiva as the Supreme Being. One of the largest Hindu denominations, it incorporates many sub-traditions ranging from devotional dualistic theism such as Shaiva Siddhanta to yoga-orientated monistic non-theism such as Kashmiri Shaivism. It considers both the Vedas and the Agama texts as important sources of theology. According to a 2010 estimate by Johnson and Grim, Shaivism is the second-largest Hindu sect, constituting about 253 million or 26.6% of Hindus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pattadakal</span> World Heritage site with 7th- and 8th-century temples in India

Pattadakal, also called Raktapura, is a complex of 7th and 8th century CE Hindu and Jain temples in northern Karnataka, India. Located on the west bank of the Malaprabha River in Bagalkot district, this UNESCO World Heritage Site is 23 kilometres (14 mi) from Badami and about 9.7 kilometres (6 mi) from Aihole, both of which are historically significant centres of Chalukya monuments. The monument is a protected site under Indian law and is managed by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Udayagiri Caves</span> Early 5th century Hindu cave temples in Madhya Pradesh

The Udayagiri Caves are twenty rock-cut caves near Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh primarily denoted to the Hindu gods Vishnu and Shiva from the early years of the 3rd century CE to 5th century CE. They contain some of the oldest surviving Hindu temples and iconography in India. They are the only site that can be verifiably associated with a Gupta period monarch from its inscriptions. One of India's most important archaeological sites, the Udayagiri hills and its caves are protected monuments managed by the Archaeological Survey of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bappa Rawal</span> Founder and Rawal of Mewar from 728-763

Bappa Rawal was a king of the Mewar kingdom in Rajasthan, India. The chronicles describe him as a member of the Guhila Rajput Clan, and some of them consider him to be the founder of the Guhila dynasty. He is credited with repelling the Arab invasion of India. He was renowned with the name "Maharaja Kaalbhoj", which meant a praise for his extremely powerful arms. He is identified as the ruler of the Guhila dynasty, and called by the names Kalabhoja, Shiladitya, and Khumana.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lakulisha</span> Hindu deity

Lakulisha was a prominent Shaivite revivalist, reformist and preceptor of the doctrine of the Pashupatas, one of the oldest sects of Shaivism.

Shiva Sutras are a collection of seventy seven aphorisms that form the foundation of the tradition of spiritual mysticism known as Kashmir Shaivism. They are attributed to the sage Vasugupta of the 9th century C.E.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mukteshvara Temple, Bhubaneswar</span> 10th-century Hindu temple in Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India

Mukteshwara Temple is a 10th-century Hindu temple dedicated to Shiva located in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. The temple dates back to 950–975 CE and is a monument of importance in the study of the development of Hindu temples in Odisha. The stylistic development the Mukteswara marks the culmination of all earlier developments, and initiates a period of experiment which continues for an entire century, as seen in such temples as the Rajarani Temple and Lingaraj temple, both located in Bhubaneswar. It is one of the prominent tourist attractions of the city.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pashupata Shaivism</span> Oldest of the major Shaivite Hindu schools

Pashupata Shaivism is one of the oldest major Shaivite Hindu schools. The mainstream which follows Vedic Pāśupata penance are 'Mahāpāśupata' and the schism of 'Lakula Pasupata' of Lakulisa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vāsudeva</span> Vrishni hero

Vāsudeva, later incorporated as Vāsudeva-Krishna, Krishna-Vāsudeva or simply Krishna, was the son of Vasudeva Anakadundubhi, king of the Vrishnis in the region of Mathura. He was a leading member of the Vrishni heroes, and may well have been an historical ruler in the region of Mathura.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Budhagupta</span> 11th Gupta emperor

Budhagupta was a Gupta emperor and the successor of Kumaragupta II. He was the son of Purugupta and was succeeded by Narasimhagupta.

The Gwalior Inscription of Mihirakula is a Sanskrit inscription recording the construction of a Surya temple from stone on the Gopa hill of Gwalior. Though now referred with the name of Mihirakula, the temple and the inscription was commissioned by Matricheta. The original temple is lost, and the inscribed red-sandstone slab was found in 1861 by Alexander Cunningham in the porch of another temple, and published in 1861. This inscribed stone from Gwalior was moved shortly after its discovery to the Kolkata museum for preservation. Several translations of it have been published thereafter. It is damaged, its script is the northern class of ancient Gupta script and the entire composition is in poetic verse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rudrasena I (Vakataka king)</span> Mahārāja

Rudrasena I was a ruler of the Nandivardhana-Pravarapura branch of the Vakataka dynasty. He was the grandson and one of the successors of Pravarasena I.

The Parivrajaka dynasty ruled parts of central India during 5th and 6th centuries. The kings of this dynasty bore the title Maharaja, and probably ruled as feudatories of the Gupta Empire. The dynasty is known from inscriptions of two of its kings: Hastin and Samkshobha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reh Inscription</span>

The Reh Inscription was discovered in 1979 near the Reh archaeological site along Yamuna River about 350 kilometres (220 mi) east of Mathura in India. It is a Prakrit inscription in Brahmi script near the bottom of a Shiva linga. The inscription is dated to between the 2nd century BCE and 2nd century CE based on the script style.

The Vasu Doorjamb Inscription is an early 1st-century CE Sanskrit inscription in Brahmi script dedicated to the deity Vāsudeva, related to the Vaishnavism tradition of Hinduism. It is also one of the several dedicatory inscriptions from Mathura bearing the name of the Indo-Scythian Northern Satrap ruler Sodasa, which are useful as historic markers for the first half of the 1st century CE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gadhwa Stone Inscriptions</span>

The Gadhwa Stone Inscriptions, or Garhwa Stone Inscriptions, are early 5th-century CE Sanskrit inscriptions discovered in Uttar Pradesh relating to a series of charitable donations to various sattra (almshouses) by Gupta Empire rulers Chandragupta II and Kumaragupta I. The inscription is notable for including symbols for numerals "8, 10, 80 and 90" in the 5th-century, as well as mentioning the ancient city of Pataliputra.

The Vadathika Cave Inscription, also called the Nagarjuni Hill Cave Inscription of Anantavarman, is a 5th- or 6th-century CE Sanskrit inscriptions in Gupta script found in the Nagarjuni hill cave of the Barabar Caves group in Gaya district Bihar. The inscription is notable for including symbol for Om in Gupta era. It marks the dedication of the cave to a statue of Bhutapati (Shiva) and Devi (Parvati). The statue was likely of Ardhanarishvara that was missing when the caves came to the attention of archaeologists in the 18th-century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gopika Cave Inscription</span> Sanskrit inscription in the Barabar Caves, Bihar, India

The Gopika Cave Inscription, also called the Nagarjuni Hill Cave Inscription II of Anantavarman or formerly the Gya inscription, is a 5th- or 6th-century CE Sanskrit inscription in Late Brahmi found in the Nagarjuni hill cave of the Barabar Caves group in Gaya district, Bihar, India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gupta art</span> Art of the Gupta Empire

Gupta art is the art of the Gupta Empire, which ruled most of northern India, with its peak between about 300 and 480 CE, surviving in much reduced form until c. 550. The Gupta period is generally regarded as a classic peak and golden age of North Indian art for all the major religious groups. Gupta art is characterized by its "Classical decorum", in contrast to the subsequent Indian medieval art, which "subordinated the figure to the larger religious purpose".

References

  1. David N Lorenzen 1972, pp. 179–180.
  2. D R Bhandarkar, B C Chhabra & G S Gai 1981, pp. 240–242.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Michael Willis 2014, pp. 134–137.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Alexis Sanderson 2013, p. 225.
  5. 1 2 3 Bhandarkar 1932, pp. 1–2.
  6. 1 2 3 Srinivasan 1969, pp. 113–121.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Bhandarkar 1932, pp. 1–5.
  8. Richard Salomon 1998, pp. 84–89.
  9. Dineschandra Sircar 1965, pp. 277–278.
  10. Bhandarkar 1932, pp. 3–4.
  11. Ashvini Agrawal 1989, p. 98.
  12. "Collections-Virtual Museum of Images and Sounds". vmis.in. American Institute of Indian Studies.
  13. 1 2 Bhandarkar 1932, pp. 8–9.
  14. Srinivasan 1969, pp. 121–122.
  15. Acharya 2005, pp. 207–222.
  16. 1 2 Michael Willis 2014, pp. 134–135.
  17. 1 2 Michael Willis 2014, pp. 136–137.
  18. Bhandarkar 1932, pp. 1–9.

Bibliography