M10 tank destroyer

Last updated

3-inch gun motor carriage M10
Aberdean proving grounds 036.JPG
Type Self-propelled anti-tank gun
Place of originUnited States
Service history
Wars World War II
1948 Arab–Israeli War
Production history
DesignerU.S. Army Ordnance Department
Designed1942
Manufacturer Fisher Body division of General Motors
Ford Motor Company
Unit costUS$47,900(equivalent to $893,223 in 2023) [1]
Produced
  • M10: September 1942 December 1943
  • M10A1: October 1942 November 1943
No. built6,406
Variantssee Variants
Specifications (3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10/M10A1 [2] )
Mass
  • M10 – 65,200 lb (29.1 long tons; 29.6 t)
  • M10A1 – 64,000 lb (29 long tons; 29 t)
Length
  • 19 ft 7 in (5.97 m) hull
  • 22 ft 5 in (6.83 m) including gun
Width10 ft 0 in (3.05 m)
Height9 ft 6 in (2.90 m) over antiaircraft machine gun
Crew5 (Commander, gunner, loader, driver, assistant driver)

Armor 0.375 to 2.25 in (9.5 to 57.2 mm)
Main
armament
3-inch gun M7 (76.2 mm) in Mount M5
54 rounds
Secondary
armament
.50 caliber (12.7 mm) Browning M2HB machine gun
300 rounds
Engine
Power/weight
  • M10 12.68 hp (9.46 kW)/metric ton
  • M10A1 15.50 hp (11.56 kW)/metric ton
Transmission Synchromesh, 5 speeds forward, 1 reverse
Suspension Vertical volute spring suspension (VVSS)
Fuel capacity
  • M10 165 US gal (620 L)
  • M10A1 192 US gal (730 L)
Operational
range
  • M10 200 mi (320 km)
  • M10A1 160 mi (260 km)
Maximum speed
  • M10 25–30 mi (40–48 km)/hr on road
  • M10A1 30 mi (48 km)/hr on road

The M10 tank destroyer, formally known as 3-inch gun motor carriage M10 or M10 GMC, was an American tank destroyer of World War II. After US entry into World War II and the formation of the Tank Destroyer Force, a suitable vehicle was needed to equip the new battalions. By November 1941, the Army requested a vehicle with a gun in a fully rotating turret after other interim models were criticized for being too poorly designed. The prototype of the M10 was conceived in early 1942 and delivered in April that year. After appropriate changes to the hull and turret were made, the modified version was selected for production in June 1942 as the "3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10". It mounted the 3-inch (76.2 mm) gun M7 in a rotating turret on a modified M4 Sherman tank chassis.

Contents

It was built in two variants. The M10 GMC used the M4A2 Sherman chassis and the M10A1 used the M4A3 chassis. Production of the two models ran from September 1942 to December 1943 and October 1942 to November 1943, respectively.

The M10 was numerically the most important U.S. tank destroyer of World War II. It combined thin but sloped armor with the M4's reliable drivetrain and a reasonably potent anti-tank gun mounted in an open-topped turret. Despite its obsolescence in the face of newer German tanks like the Panther medium tank and the introduction of more powerful and better-designed types as replacements, the M10 remained in service until the end of the war. During World War II, the primary user of the M10 tank destroyer was the United States, but many supplied under Lend-Lease to the United Kingdom, Canada and Free French forces. Several dozen were also sent to the Soviet Union. Post-war, the M10 was given as military surplus to several countries, such as Belgium, Denmark, and the Netherlands, through the Mutual Defense Assistance Act or acquired through other means by countries like Israel and the Republic of China.

The M10 is often referred to by the nickname "Wolverine", an unofficial name that sometimes appeared in wartime Chrysler advertising, but that was not used by U.S. troops; [3] the M10 was never officially assigned a nickname or referred to with one when used by American soldiers, who simply called it a "TD" (a nickname for any tank destroyer in general) beyond its formal designation. [4] [5]

Doctrine

U.S. combined arms doctrine on the eve of World War II held that tanks should be designed to fulfill the role of forcing a breakthrough into enemy rear areas. Separate GHQ (General Headquarters) tank battalions would support infantry in destroying fixed enemy defenses, and armored divisions would then exploit the breakthrough to rush into the enemy's vulnerable rear areas. U.S. tanks were expected to fight any hostile tanks they encountered in their attack, but the mission of destroying massed enemy armored thrusts was assigned to a new branch, the Tank Destroyer Force developed in 1941. Tank destroyer units were meant to counter German blitzkrieg tactics. Rather than rely on a "thin cordon" of anti-tank guns which would be defeated by a concentrated attack, the tank destroyer units were to be held as a reserve behind the battleline (at the corps or army level), and were to move quickly to the site of any massed enemy tank breakthrough. [6] They would maneuver aggressively and using ambush tactics to destroy enemy tanks; charging or chasing enemy tanks was explicitly prohibited. [7] This led to a requirement for very fast, well-armed vehicles. Though equipped with turrets (unlike most self-propelled anti-tank guns of the day), the typical American design was more heavily gunned, but more lightly armored, and thus more maneuverable, than a contemporary tank. The idea was to use speed and agility as a defense, rather than thick armor, to bring a powerful self-propelled gun into action against enemy tanks. Or more precisely, to use speed to deploy ahead of the attacking enemy, take up camouflaged and protected firing positions on their flanks if possible, and then open fire. If unable to destroy the enemy force or to force them to retreat, then mobility would be used to avoid enemy fire until the TDs could withdraw, preferably to move up and deploy for another ambush. Direct combat in the open against tanks was to be avoided whenever possible.

Development

After the formation of the Tank Destroyer Tactical and Firing Center at Camp Hood, Texas in November 1941, the Army began testing to standardize on a configuration for the new tank destroyer battalions. The Tank Destroyer board began to examine several hundred Ordnance Department prototype proposals for a tank destroyer mounting a 3-inch gun, initially focusing the most interest on two:

Meanwhile, as the final design developments of these two tank destroyers were underway, the Ordnance Department became dissatisfied and in November 1941 issued an additional specification for a tank destroyer with a 3-inch gun in a rotating turret. Design work began immediately. The 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage T35 combined an early-production M4A2 medium tank hull with the 3-inch gun M7 (also derived from the M1918 gun) from the M6 Heavy Tank in a cast, circular, open-topped turret. Using lessons learned from combat reports from the Philippines, the armor on the sides and rear of the upper hull was changed from flat to sloped plates. This new test vehicle was designated the 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage T35E1. Prototypes of these two vehicles were delivered to Aberdeen Proving Ground in April 1942, and the Army selected the T35E1 for further development on 2 May 1942. [8] The side and rear upper hull armor of the T35E1 was reduced from 1 inch (25 mm) to 0.75 inches (19 mm) in order to reduce the weight of the vehicle. The staff at Aberdeen Proving Ground was worried that the armor of the T35E1 was too thin, and so bosses for appliqué armor panels were added to the hull sides, glacis, and turret sides. As the cast turret was found to be difficult to manufacture, the design of the turret was changed to a sloped pentagonal shape made of welded armor plate. [9] In June 1942, the modified T35E1 was standardized as the 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10. By fall 1943, with its M5 and M9 competitors being eliminated from the design competition and their production contracts cancelled, the M10 was to become the United States' primary tank destroyer of the early war period.[ citation needed ]

As there were fears that the production of M4A2 chassis would be inadequate for M10 production, an alternate design, the 3-inch Gun Motor Carriage M10A1 based on the M4A3 medium tank chassis, was also authorized for production.[ citation needed ]

Design

Brazilian infantry resting beside a US M10 in Italy, April 1945. Brazilian Troops - Infantry & M10 Crew, Italy April 1945.jpg
Brazilian infantry resting beside a US M10 in Italy, April 1945.

American tank destroyer doctrine emphasized speed and gun power over armor. As a result, the M10's armor was thin, which made it vulnerable to most German anti-tank weapons. The thickness of the M10's armor ranged from 38 to 2+14 in (10 to 57 mm). The lower hull, being modified from that of a standard M4A2 or M4A3 Sherman tank, had 1-inch-thick (25 mm) armor on the sides and rear, and a 12-inch-thick (13 mm) floor. The rounded, cast transmission cover was 2 inches (51 mm) thick. In a departure from its M4 Sherman parent, the M10 lacked the extra 12-inch floor plate under the driver's and assistant driver's stations that provided them additional protection from mines.

The glacis plate was 1+12 inches (38 mm) thick, sloped at 55 degrees from the vertical. The sides and rear of the upper hull were 34 inch (19 mm) thick, sloped at 38 degrees from the vertical. The rear upper hull plate was used for storage of the vehicle's pioneer and maintenance tools: a 5-pound (2.3 kg) axe, a 5-foot (1.5 m) crowbar, a mattock handle and head, a double-sided 10-pound (4.5 kg) sledgehammer, and a track tensioning wrench. The sides and rear of the upper hull featured angled extensions or covers over the upper run of track. These extensions often got in the way of fitting "duckbill" extended end connectors, used to reduce ground pressure on soft ground, and were often removed, along with the front fenders, by maintenance units. The hull roof plate ranged from 34 inch (19 mm) thick over the driver's and assistant driver's stations and turret ring, to 38 inch (9.5 mm) thick over the engine compartment.

The manually rotated turret of the M10 was a pentagonal shape. The sides were sloped 15 degrees inward from the vertical and were 1 inch (25 mm) thick. The rear of the turret was also 1 inch thick. The partial roof on the front third of the turret opening was 34 inch (19 mm) thick. The triangular cast gun shield sported the thickest armor on the vehicle, 2+14 inches (57 mm). It was sloped at 45 degrees from the vertical and horizontal.

The M10 and M10A1 were mechanically identical except for their power plants. The M10 used the General Motors 6046, a twin engine formed from two Detroit Diesel 6-71 inline engines mated to a single output. The tandem engine produced 375 horsepower (280 kW) at 2,100 rpm. One advantage of the GM 6046 was that the engines could be disconnected at will from the output and run independently. If one of the engines was damaged or destroyed, it could be disconnected and the other engine used to move the vehicle. The engine of the M10A1 was the Ford GAA, an 8-cylinder derivative of an ill-fated V-12 aircraft engine project. It produced 450 horsepower (340 kW) at 2,600 rpm. When tested side by side in September 1943, the M10A1 was judged to have superior automotive performance to the M10. Even though it produced only slightly less torque, the M10A1's engine was far lighter, and used a common fuel like the rest of the Army's vehicles (gasoline). By the time the test results were released in February 1944, the Army was committed to using the M10 overseas. As a result, the M10A1 was kept in the United States for training.

The M10 and M10A1 had a crew of five; commander, gunner, loader, driver, and assistant driver. The driver and assistant driver (who also operated the vehicle's radio) were seated in the front hull and provided with periscopes. The unique design of the hull hatches to clear the gun mantlet meant that the driver's view directly to the left side was obstructed. He was provided with a second periscope at the edge of the hull for this purpose. The commander, gunner, and loader were all located in the turret. The commander sat on a folding seat at the right rear. The gunner, on the left side of the gun, normally stood to operate it, but he was also provided with a folding seat. The loader normally stood in the area behind the gun. A third folding seat was provided in the turret for the assistant driver in case he needed to assist the loader for any reason.

Unlike the M4 tanks it was based upon, the M10 lacked an auxiliary generator, which forced the crew to run the main engines in order to recharge the vehicle's batteries. The engine noise and smoke could attract enemy fire, especially in close quarters, where the M10 was vulnerable due to its thin armor and open-topped turret. The lack of an auxiliary generator was rectified with the introduction of the M36 tank destroyer.

Production

Production of M10 and M10A1 [10]
MonthM10M10A1
September 1942105
October 19421703
November 194213718
December 19421997
January 194327656
February 1943340116
March 1943330150
April 1943428133
May 1943416123
June 1943400133
July 1943402124
August 1943465131
September 194349849
October 1943350150
November 1943237220
December 1943240
January 1944300 hulls
Total4,9931,413
+ 300 hulls

Soon after reaching production, it was realized that the barrel of the 3-inch gun M7 was too heavy, [11] to the point where it prevented traverse of the turret on a slope of more than four degrees. As an attempt to improve the figure to fifteen degrees, the Army ordered that the track grousers and antiaircraft machine gun be stored on the rear of the turret. This did not solve the balance problem, and on 21 December 1942, triangular "quick fix" turret counterweights made of lead, mild steel, or cast iron were authorized. The mild steel parts weighed 2,400 pounds. Meanwhile, a set of wedge-shaped counterweights weighing 3,700 pounds total was designed by Fisher. The wedge-shaped weights began to be added to new vehicles at Fisher on 25 January 1943. By late December 1942, a second lock was added to the turret and a stirrup-shaped gun cradle was added to the rear deck to secure the gun for travel.

Since the track grousers could not be stored on the rear of the turret anymore, grouser racks that could be attached to the appliqué armor bosses on the hull were added to vehicles beginning in early April 1943. The M10 initially lacked any provision for indirect fire. In May 1943, an azimuth indicator and gunner's quadrant were added to the M10. The grouser racks and indirect fire equipment were often retrofitted to earlier vehicles. By late June 1943, it was realized that Fisher's initial counterweights were too heavy. Two newly designed counterweights reduced the total weight to 2,500 pounds and better distributed the weight of the gun. They resembled an upside-down "duck bill" shape when viewed from the side. To accommodate the new weights, the design of the upper rear of the turret was changed from sloped inwards to nearly vertical. In July 1943, the appliqué armor bosses on the hull sides and turret were dropped from production. The bosses on the glacis were retained. In late September 1943, a single M10 was tested with an Oilgear hydraulic traversing motor that could traverse the turret even without the counterweights, but this modification was not pursued as the production contracts were reaching their end.

M10 shown in mass production at General Motors tank arsenal. M-10 Tank Destroyer.jpg
M10 shown in mass production at General Motors tank arsenal.

Production of 4,993 M10s by the Fisher Body division of General Motors at the Fisher Tank Arsenal in Grand Blanc, Michigan ran from September 1942 through December 1943. Ford Motor Company built 1,038 M10A1s from October 1942 until September 1943. [12] From September to November 1943, Fisher built the remaining 375 M10A1s. Fisher also completed a further 300 M10A1 hulls without turrets in January 1944 for direct conversion to M36 tank destroyers. From January to June 1944, 209 M10A1 vehicles were subsequently converted to M35 Prime Movers by removing the turret and adding the necessary equipment for them to tow the 8-inch Gun M1 and 240 mm Howitzer M1

1,413 M10A1s, including the 300 hulls manufactured in January 1944, and 724 M10s were eventually converted into M36 tank destroyers. [13]

Production of M10 and M10A1 [14]
ModelQuantityContractSerial numbersRegistration numbers
M101,800374-ORD-18803 through 18024040705 through 4042504
M10A11,038374-ORD-12131803 through 28404046509 through 4047546
M101,200374-ORD-18802841 through 40404081054 through 4082253
M101,117374-ORD-18805991 through 710740110110 through 40111226
M10876T-75817108 through 7983Unknown
M10A1375374-ORD-12137984 through 835840112380 through 40112754

Armament

Primary

The M10 tank destroyer had an open-topped manually traversed turret mounting the 3-inch gun M7 in the M5 mount. [15] The gunner stood or sat on the left side of the gun, and aimed it using the M51 or M70G telescope. An M12A4 panoramic telescope was also provided on the right side of the turret for indirect fire use. The M10 carried 54 rounds of 3-inch ammunition, 48 of which were stowed in four racks in the sponsons, and 6 rounds in the upper rear of the turret. For combat use, the 3-inch Gun M7 could fire five types of ammunition:

The M79 AP shot could penetrate 92 mm of homogeneous armor angled at 30 degrees from the vertical at 1,000 yards. The M62 APCBC/HE-T shell was capable of penetrating 88 mm of homogeneous armor under the same conditions The T4 (later M93) HVAP shot was rare and was used in small numbers beginning in September 1944. It could penetrate 135 mm of homogeneous armor at 30 degrees and 1,000 yards. This shot featured a sub-caliber tungsten carbide penetrator encased within a steel jacket and aluminum body and ballistic "windshield". By March 1945, about 18,000 rounds of this special ammunition had been delivered to the European Theater, 58 percent of which were 3-inch projectiles. [16] The M42A1 high explosive shell was used for indirect artillery fire or against fortifications and soft targets like infantry in trenches or antitank guns. The M88 hexachloroethane smoke shell was used to create smoke screens, or to flush enemy infantry out of buildings or fortified positions.

A .50 caliber (12.7 mm) Browning M2HB heavy machine gun could be mounted on the top rear of the turret for use against enemy infantry and for anti-aircraft use. The ammuntion (300 rounds in 50-round boxes) was stowed under the vehicle subfloor. The crew had personal weapons for self-defense. A Thompson submachine gun with 460 rounds of ammunition was stowed on brackets in the right rear of the turret for use by the vehicle commander. The other four crew members were armed with M1 carbines, each carrying as much ammunition on their person as they saw fit. An M1903 Springfield rifle with 60 rounds of ammunition was stowed next to the assistant driver, and an adapter for the rifle and ten M9 rifle grenades for use against tanks were stowed under the left front vehicle subfloor. Storage boxes in the turret held five Mk 2 grenade, five M18 smoke grenade, and two thermite grenades.[ citation needed ]

Combat use

M10 in action near Saint-Lo, June 1944. American tank firing.jpg
M10 in action near Saint-Lô, June 1944.
M10 of the 701st Tank Destroyer Battalion advances along a mountain road in Italy, 3 March 1945. M10 tank destroyer italy 1945 sm.jpg
M10 of the 701st Tank Destroyer Battalion advances along a mountain road in Italy, 3 March 1945.

United States Army

Two American M10 tank destroyers in Belgium during World War II. Tank destroyers.jpg
Two American M10 tank destroyers in Belgium during World War II.

The M10's heavy chassis did not conform to the quickly evolving tank destroyer doctrine of employing very light high-speed vehicles, and starting in the summer of 1944 it began to be supplemented by the fast M18 Hellcat. American tank destroyer doctrine called for tank destroyers to be kept in reserve and rushed forward to counter massed enemy armored attacks. In reality, this was not the case and M10 battalions were attached, often semi-permanently, to infantry and armored divisions to provide additional direct and indirect fire support. Typical missions included providing indirect artillery fire by augmenting divisional artillery units, following and supporting the lead elements of an infantry assault, attacking obstacles such as fortifications and enemy vehicles (including tanks) that hampered the advance of friendly units, and setting up an antitank defense once the objective was secured.

The combat debut of the M10 came on 23 March 1943, during the Battle of El Guettar, in the Tunisian campaign part of the larger North African campaign. The M10 was initially successful as its M7 3-inch gun could destroy most German tanks then in service. During the battle, M10s of the 899th Tank Destroyer Battalion and M3 Gun Motor Carriages of the 601st Tank Destroyer Battalion destroyed 30 German tanks, although 20 M3s and 7 M10s were lost. The M10 did not see much anti-tank action for the rest of the North African campaign, and instead was used as mobile fire support.

During tank fighting in the Normandy campaign, the M10's 3-inch gun was proven to be ineffective against the thick frontal armor of the German Panther medium tank. On 6 July 1944, Eisenhower's headquarters requested that all M10 battalions be converted to the new M36 as soon as possible. [17] [18] [ page needed ] On 10 July 1944, the 899th Tank Destroyer Battalion blunted a German counterattack by the Panzer Lehr Division near Le Dézert and destroyed 12 Panthers, one Panzer IV, and one Sturmgeschütz III assault gun in a fierce two-day battle, most of it taking place at ranges of less than 200 m (220 yd). Due to the initial shock of encountering heavy German tanks, further changes were made in the tank destroyer force in late September 1944. American officials requested that of the 52 battalions then committed to the European theater, 20 be converted to the M36, 20 retain the M10 or M18 at the discretion of their commanders, and the 12 towed battalions be re-equipped with the (then-prototype) T5 90 mm towed gun. [19] [20] By October 1944, the improved 90 mm Gun Motor Carriage M36 began to arrive in Europe, and mostly replaced the M10 by the end of the war. The plans to retain any towed battalions at all were canceled after their generally poor performance and high losses in 1944, especially during the Battle of the Bulge.[ citation needed ]

In the Italian campaign, as in northern Europe, the M10s were normally attached to infantry or armored units as infantry support or mobile artillery, more so the latter because of the general lack of German armor in that theater. Many US divisional commanders asked for their M10s to be replaced with fully armored tanks.[ citation needed ] In the Pacific war, due to the lack of serious Japanese tank opposition, US Army M10s were not used as tank destroyers, but as mobile artillery and infantry support. The M10 proved unpopular in the Pacific due to its open turret, which left it vulnerable to Japanese close-assault antitank tactics.[ citation needed ]

British Army

3in SPM M10 conversions to 17pdr [21]
MonthConversions
May 194498
June 194481
July 194469
August 194470
September 1944112
October 1944126
November 1944152
December 194482
January 194586
February 194595
March 194530
April 194518
Total1,017

The United States supplied 1,648 M10s to the British Army via the Lend-Lease program.[ citation needed ] [lower-alpha 3] The British gave them the designation 3inch Self-propelled Mount M10 (3-in SPM M10). The M10 with the "wedge" counterweight was known as the "3in SPM M10 Mk I" and the M10 with the "duck bill" counterweight was the "3in SPM M10 Mk II". 1,017 of the vehicles were up-gunned with the powerful 17-pounder (76.2mm) gun from May 1944 to April 1945. [22] Within the Department of Tank Design both the 3-inch and 17-pounder versions were known as "Achilles". [lower-alpha 4] The 17-pounder conversions were designated with a "C" suffix added on to the "M10" designation, called "17pdr M10" or "Achilles Ic". Most of the vehicles converted were the 3in SPM M10 Mk II, as the duck bill counterweight balanced the heavy gun better. The gun mantlet needed modification to accept the barrel. Although the 17-pounder was a similar bore to the 3-inch gun M7, it had a longer barrel and used a larger propellant charge giving far superior armor penetrating capabilities. Using the APDS round, the gun performance was increased by about 50%. The 17pdr SP was used by the British, Canadian and Polish armies in Italy and northwest Europe. [23] As well as service with British forces in Northwest Europe, they were retained post-war. Those not upgunned were stripped of their turrets and used as artillery tractors.

In British service, as self-propelled anti-tank guns, the M10 was operated by regiments of the Royal Artillery. Typically, two batteries had M10s while the other two batteries had the towed 17-pounder gun. One tactical theory was that the two towed batteries would form a gun line, while an M10 battery remained mobile on each flank to drive or lead enemy tanks to the static gun line. In practice, UK batteries were frequently separated in Normandy, M10s being seconded to British tank brigades equipped with Churchill tanks armed with the general purpose 75 mm gun just as were British 17 pounder conversions.[ citation needed ]

Free French Army

The Free French received at least 227 M10s, 155 of them through Lend-Lease. [24] They served first in Italy, then in France and Germany. During the liberation of Paris in August 1944, a single M10 of General Leclerc's 2nd Armored Division named "Siroco" disabled a Panther in the Place de la Concorde from under the Arc de Triomphe on the Place de L'Etoile, at 1,800 m. French M10s also saw action on the French-German border around Strasbourg and in southern Germany; the Free French First Army led by General De Lattre received some when they were a part of the Sixth United States Army Group. French M10s were operated along similar lines as US tank destroyer units, although initially with five vehicles per platoon instead of four.[ citation needed ]

Red Army

Approximately 52 M10s were supplied to the Soviet Union through Lend-Lease. They were used to form two self-propelled artillery regiments (SPA). The first was the 1223rd Self-propelled Artillery Regiment of the 29th Tank Corps, part of the 5th Guards Tank Army. This unit served on the 3rd Belorussian Front in 1944, taking part in summer campaigns in Belorussia, the Baltic, and East Prussia. The 1239th Self-propelled Artillery Regiment was part of the 16th Tank Corps, 2nd Tank Army. It fought in Belorussia and Poland in 1944. [25]

Third Reich

In 1944, during the Battle of the Bulge, Operation Greif was a plan developed by the Nazis to infiltrate behind the Allies lines. They made various modifications to make approximately ten Panther tanks look as similar as possible to the American M10, known as the "Panther M10" or the "Ersatz M10" (Ersatz meaning 'replacement' or 'substitute' in German).

Israel

Israel bought M10s from scrapyards and dumping grounds in Europe after 1948. They came the Idea to up-gun the M10 with the modern SA50 gun which was considered an improvement. The first batch arrived in 1951, being in very bad shape. Some years later, as the M10's guns were worn out, Israel decided to install QF 17-pounder These were called the M50 Achillies. Israel requested the assistance of France to develop the new tank in 1953. After building the prototype, France taught Israel how to do it themselves and provided their technical knowledge related to this development along with a contract to sell the SA50 guns and ammunition. The M10s were repaired and entered service in 1955. After the 1956 war, It is believed that Israel may have captured several from Egypt that received the diesel engines of captured Egyptian Sherman tanks. They were withdrawn from service by 1966.

israeli mod M10-sa50.jpg
israeli mod

[26]

[27]

Egypt

The Egyptian Army had a small number of ex-British M10s, 3-inch and 17-pdr versions, and used them in 1948 against Israel. Israel captured some of them.[ citation needed ]

Combat performance

M10 strength and losses in the ETO [28]
MonthM10 strengthM10 losses
June 19446911
July 194474317
August 194475828
September 194476340
October 194448671
November 194457345
December 194479062
January 194576069
February 1945686106
March 194568427
April 194542737
May 194542737

The M10's open-topped turret left the crew vulnerable to artillery and mortar fire and fragments. The 893rd Tank Destroyer Battalion took many casualties from artillery fire and tree bursts and lost 16 of 24 M10s during the Battle of the Hürtgen Forest. [29] The crew was also exposed to sniper fire and infantry close assault, such as grenades thrown through the open turret, or attacks from upper story-windows, especially in urban warfare and wooded areas.

However, the open-topped turret gave excellent visibility, which was valuable for a vehicle that was tasked with finding enemy armored vehicles and other targets. The open top also made escape easier when the vehicle was hit and improved communications with accompanying infantry.

The M10 had a very slow turret rotation speed, as the turret traverse was unpowered and the crew used a hand crank to rotate the turret. It took approximately 80 seconds to rotate a full 360 degrees. [30]

Total M10 losses in the European Theater of Operations to all causes were 539. [31]

M10 tank destroyers disembarking on a Normandy beach to join the fighting. M10 Disembarks Normandy.jpg
M10 tank destroyers disembarking on a Normandy beach to join the fighting.

Despite not adhering strictly to the tank destroyer doctrine, the M10 still achieved impressive scores against enemy tanks. A US Army study of 39 tank destroyer battalions found that each destroyed, on average, 34 tanks, 17 towed guns, and 16 pillboxes. The tank destroyer battalions in the Third Army claimed the destruction of 686 tanks and 238 self-propelled guns. The highest-scoring tank destroyer battalion in the European Theater, the 823rd Tank Destroyer Battalion, claimed to have destroyed 113 panzers, including 27 Panthers and 18 Tigers, using towed guns and M10s. The 773rd Tank Destroyer Battalion also claimed to have destroyed 113 panzers, with the 702nd Tank Destroyer Battalion claiming 103. The 601st Tank Destroyer Battalion, which fought in North Africa, Italy, and Europe, claimed to have knocked out 155 tanks and self-propelled guns. [32] Tank destroyers in the European Theater fired approximately 11 high-explosive (HE) rounds for every round of armor-piercing (AP) ammunition, an indication of their use in general support duties in addition to the intended mission of anti-tank defense.[ citation needed ]

Variants

M10C. The muzzle brake and a small counterweight bolted to the gun barrel are visible. M10-Achilles-latrun-1.jpg
M10C. The muzzle brake and a small counterweight bolted to the gun barrel are visible.

Users

See also

Vehicles of comparable role, performance and era

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tank destroyer</span> Armoured fighting vehicle designed to engage and destroy enemy tanks

A tank destroyer, tank hunter or tank killer is a type of armoured fighting vehicle, predominantly intended for anti-tank duties. They are typically armed with a direct fire artillery gun, also known as a self-propelled anti-tank gun, or missile launcher, also called an anti-tank missile carrier. The vehicles are designed specifically to engage and destroy enemy tanks, often with limited operational capacities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M4 Sherman</span> American medium tank widely used during World War 2

The M4 Sherman, officially medium tank, M4, was the most widely used medium tank by the United States and Western Allies in World War II. The M4 Sherman proved to be reliable, relatively cheap to produce, and available in great numbers. It was also the basis of several other armored fighting vehicles including self-propelled artillery, tank destroyers, and armored recovery vehicles. Tens of thousands were distributed through the Lend-Lease program to the British Commonwealth, Soviet Union, and other Allied Nations. The tank was named by the British after the American Civil War General William Tecumseh Sherman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M26 Pershing</span> American medium/heavy battle tank (1944–1951)

The M26 Pershing is a heavy tank, later designated as a medium tank, formerly used by the United States Army. It was used in the last months of World War II during the Invasion of Germany and extensively during the Korean War. The tank was named after General of the Armies John J. Pershing, who led the American Expeditionary Force in Europe in World War I.

This page details tank production by the United States of America during World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M3 Stuart</span> WW2 American light tank

The M3 Stuart/light tank M3, was an American light tank of World War II. An improved version of the tank entered service as the M5 in 1942 to be supplied to British and other Commonwealth forces under lend-lease prior to the entry of the U.S. into the war. Afterwards, it was used by U.S. and Allied forces until the end of the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M24 Chaffee</span> American light tank

The M24 Chaffee was an American light tank used during the later part of World War II; it was also used in post–World War II conflicts including the Korean War, and by the French in the War in Algeria and the First Indochina War. In British service it was given the service name Chaffee after the United States Army general, Adna R. Chaffee Jr., who helped develop the use of tanks in the United States armed forces. Although the M41 Walker Bulldog was developed as a replacement, M24s were not mostly removed from U.S. and NATO armies until the 1960s and remained in service with some Third World countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M3 Lee</span> American medium tank of World War II

The M3 Lee, officially Medium Tank, M3, was an American medium tank used during World War II. The turret was produced in two forms, one for US needs and one modified to British requirements to place the radio next to the commander. In British Commonwealth service, the tank was called by two names: tanks employing US-pattern turrets were called "Lee", named after Confederate general Robert E. Lee, while those with British-pattern turrets were known as "Grant", named after Union general Ulysses S. Grant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M36 tank destroyer</span> Self-propelled anti-tank gun

The M36 tank destroyer, formally 90 mm Gun Motor Carriage, M36, was an American tank destroyer used during World War II. The M36 combined the hull of the M10 tank destroyer, which used the M4 Sherman's reliable chassis and drivetrain combined with sloped armor, and a new turret mounting the 90 mm gun M3. Conceived in 1943, the M36 first served in combat in Europe in October 1944, where it partially replaced the M10 tank destroyer. It also saw use in the Korean War, where it was able to defeat any of the Soviet tanks used in that conflict. Some were supplied to South Korea as part of the Military Assistance Program and served for years, as did re-engined examples found in Yugoslavia, which operated into the 1990s. Two remained in service with the Republic of China Army at least until 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M18 Hellcat</span> American tank destroyer

The M18 Hellcat is a tank destroyer used by the United States Army in World War II and the Korean War. Despite being equipped with the same main gun as some variants of the much larger Sherman tank, the M18 attained a much higher top speed of up to 55 mph (89 km/h) by keeping armor to a minimum, and using the innovative Torqmatic automatic transmission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M8 Greyhound</span> Armored car

The M8 light armored car is a 6×6 armored car produced by the Ford Motor Company during World War II. It was used from 1943 by United States and British forces in Europe and the Pacific until the end of the war. The vehicle was widely exported and as of 2024 still remained in service with some countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M4 Sherman variants</span> Tank variants of World War II

The M4 Sherman tank was produced in several variants, a result of mass production spread across several manufacturers and several years. It was also the basis for a number of related vehicles and Shermans have been modified by several nations, ranging from upgrades to complete hull conversions for another task. Originally designed in 1941, M4 variants were still used by Israel during the 1967 and 1973 wars with its Arab neighbors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">76 mm gun M1</span> American tank gun

The 76 mm gun M1 was an American World War II–era tank gun developed by the U.S United States Ordnance Department in 1942 to supplement the 75 mm gun on the basic Medium tank M4. It was also used to arm the M18 Hellcat tank destroyer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Howitzer Motor Carriage M8</span> WW2 US self-propelled gun

The 75 mm howitzer motor carriage M8 was a self-propelled howitzer vehicle of the United States in use during World War II. It was developed on the chassis of the M5 Stuart tank and was equipped with a M116 howitzer in an M7 mount. The vehicle is also known by the nickname General Scott, or just Scott, which was originally assigned to the vehicle by the Ordnance Department in November 1944 for publicity purposes, such as in newspapers, but does not appear to have been used by troops in the field during the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">3-inch gun M5</span> WW2 US anti-tank gun

The 3-inch gun M5 was an anti-tank gun developed in the United States during World War II. The gun combined a 3-inch (76.2 mm) barrel of the anti-aircraft gun T9 and elements of the 105 mm howitzer M2. The M5 was issued exclusively to the US Army tank destroyer battalions starting in 1943. It saw combat in the Italian Campaign and on the Western Front in Northwest Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M3 Gun Motor Carriage</span> American tank destroyer

The M3 gun motor carriage was a United States Army tank destroyer equipped with a 75 mm M1897A4 gun, which was built by the Autocar Company during World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tank destroyer battalion (United States)</span> Type of unit used by the United States Army during World War II

The tank destroyer battalion was a type of military unit used by the United States Army during World War II. The unit was organized in one of two different forms—a towed battalion equipped with anti-tank guns, or a mechanized battalion equipped with armored self-propelled guns. The tank destroyer units were formed in response to the German use of massed formations of armored vehicles units early in WWII. The tank destroyer concept envisioned the battalions acting as independent units that would respond at high speed to large enemy tank attacks. In this role, they would be attached in groups or brigades to corps or armies. In practice, they were usually individually attached to infantry divisions. Over one hundred battalions were formed, of which more than half saw combat service. The force was disbanded shortly after the end of the war when the concept had been shown to be militarily unsound.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T40/M9 tank destroyer</span> WWII US anti-tank prototype

The 3-inch gun motor carriage T40, later given the production model number M9 was a US tank destroyer, of the early part of World War II. It mounted a 3-inch anti-aircraft gun on a M3 medium tank hull. A small production run of 50 tanks was planned in 1942. This was cancelled due to the unavailability of suitable guns, and the entry into production of a similar vehicle, the M10 GMC tank destroyer which used a later version of the gun.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">17pdr SP Achilles</span> British self-propelled anti-tank gun

The 17pdr SP Achilles is a British variant of the American M10 tank destroyer armed with the British Ordnance QF 17-pounder high-velocity 76.2 mm (3-inch) anti-tank gun in place of the M10's considerably less powerful 3-inch Gun M7. A total of 1,100 M10s were converted to Achilles, making it the second most numerous armoured fighting vehicle to carry the 17-pounder gun, behind the Sherman Firefly tank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T48 Gun Motor Carriage</span> Self-propelled anti-tank gun

The T48 57 mm gun motor carriage was a self-propelled anti-tank gun produced by the Diamond T company in 1943 for the United States. The design incorporated a 57 mm gun M1, a US production of the British Ordnance QF 6 pounder, mounted on an M3 half-track.

References

Notes

  1. The M5 was criticized as being too hastily designed and was rendered obsolete by the Army's request for a turreted tank destroyer. It was cancelled on 30 September 1942.
  2. The M9 was also criticized and performed very poorly during trials, breaking a track and later catching fire. It was cancelled on 28 August 1942, when it was realized that there were only 28 M1918 guns available to use for production vehicles.
  3. The British were the conduit for Lend-Lease materiel to the French and Polish forces.
  4. This fitted in the British naming system, along with the Archer, the Avenger, and the Alecto; the name was rarely used by troops during the war

Citations

  1. Zaloga (2002) p8
  2. "3" GMC M10".
  3. Zaloga (2002), author's note
  4. Bryan Perrett (2003), Impossible Victories, p 98, Barnes & Noble, ISBN   978-0-7607-3533-6
  5. Chris Henry & Brian Delf (2004), British Anti-tank Artillery 1939–45, p 23, Osprey, ISBN   978-1-84176-638-6.
  6. Steven J Zaloga M10 and M36 Tank Destroyers 1942-53 Osprey
  7. War Department (18 July 1944). "FM18-5, Tactical Employment: Tank Destroyer Unit" (PDF). Chapter 2 p.5 via Hyperwar Foundation.
  8. Zaloga (2002) p7
  9. Zaloga (2013) p25
  10. Zaloga (2002) p12
  11. Hunnicutt (1978) p198
  12. David Doyle (2003), Standard Catalog of US Military Vehicles, p 356
  13. Zaloga (2002) p21
  14. Doyle (2015) p13
  15. Hunnicutt (1978) p563
  16. Zaloga (2004) pp. 23–24
  17. "M10 3in Gun Motor Carriage".
  18. Zaloga (2005)
  19. Zaloga (2002) p24-33
  20. Yeide (2010) p174
  21. Zaloga (2002) p21
  22. Zaloga (2002) p21
  23. M10 Achilles IIC
  24. Zaloga (2002) p40-41
  25. Zaloga (2002) p41
  26. "The M10 Gun Motor Carriage in Israel by Life_In_Black – Status Report". ritastatusreport.live. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016.
  27. "The M10 Gun Motor Carriage in Israel by Life_In_Black – Status Report". ritastatusreport.live. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016.
  28. Zaloga (2002) p36
  29. Miller (2003) p90
  30. Zaloga (2002) p23
  31. Yeide (2010) p250
  32. Yeide (2010) p249
  33. AFV News Vol. 41, No. 2 May–Aug 2006
  34. "M10(自走榴彈砲版)". Archived from the original on 19 July 2012. Retrieved 21 October 2011.

Sources