Polity data series

Last updated

Number of nations 1800-2003 scoring 8 or higher on the Polity IV scale, a measure of democracy. Number of nations 1800-2003 scoring 8 or higher on Polity IV scale.png
Number of nations 18002003 scoring 8 or higher on the Polity IV scale, a measure of democracy.
World map showing findings from the Polity IV data series report for 2017. Polity IV 2017.png
World map showing findings from the Polity IV data series report for 2017.

The Polity data series is a data series in political science research. [1] [2] [3] Along with the V-Dem Democracy indices project and Democracy Index (The Economist), Polity is among prominent datasets that measure democracy and autocracy. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

Contents

The Polity study was initiated in the late 1960s by Ted Robert Gurr and is now continued by Monty G. Marshall, one of Gurr's students. It was sponsored by the Political Instability Task Force (PITF) until February 2020. [9] The PITF is funded by the Central Intelligence Agency. [10]

The data series has been criticized for its methodology, Americentrism, and connections to the CIA. Seva Gunitsky, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto, stated that the data series was appropriate "for research that examines constraints on governing elites, but not for studying the expansion of suffrage over the nineteenth century".

Scoring chart

Polity Score ranges from -10 to +10
Polity score range106 to 91 to 5-5 to 0-10 to -6
Regime typeFull Democracy Democracy Open Anocracy Closed Anocracy Autocracy

Scores for 2018

CountryDemocracy scoreAutocracy scorePolity IV score [11] [12] Polity IV regime type
Flag of the Taliban.svg  Afghanistan 12-1Closed Anocracy
Flag of Albania.svg  Albania 909Democracy
Flag of Algeria.svg  Algeria 312Open Anocracy
Flag of Angola.svg  Angola 24-2Closed Anocracy
Flag of Argentina.svg  Argentina 909Democracy
Flag of Armenia.svg  Armenia 707Democracy
Flag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Austria.svg  Austria 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Azerbaijan.svg  Azerbaijan 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Bahrain.svg  Bahrain 010-10Autocracy
Flag of Bangladesh.svg  Bangladesh 06-6Autocracy
Flag of Belarus.svg  Belarus 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Belgium (civil).svg  Belgium 808Democracy
Flag of Benin.svg  Benin 707Democracy
Flag of Bhutan.svg  Bhutan 707Democracy
Bandera de Bolivia (Estado).svg  Bolivia 707Democracy
Flag of Botswana.svg  Botswana 808Democracy
Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil 808Democracy
Flag of Bulgaria.svg  Bulgaria 909Democracy
Flag of Burkina Faso.svg  Burkina Faso 716Democracy
Flag of Burundi.svg  Burundi 23-1Closed Anocracy
Flag of Cambodia.svg  Cambodia 04-4Closed Anocracy
Flag of Cameroon.svg  Cameroon 15-4Closed Anocracy
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Cape Verde.svg  Cape Verde 10010Full Democracy
Flag of the Central African Republic.svg  Central African Republic 716Democracy
Flag of Chad.svg  Chad 13-2Closed Anocracy
Flag of Chile.svg  Chile 10010Full Democracy
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  China 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Colombia.svg  Colombia 707Democracy
Flag of the Comoros.svg  Comoros 03-3Closed Anocracy
Flag of the Republic of the Congo.svg Congo Brazzaville 04-4Closed Anocracy
Flag of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.svg Congo Kinshasa 14-3Closed Anocracy
Flag of Costa Rica.svg  Costa Rica 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Croatia.svg  Croatia 909Democracy
Flag of Cuba.svg  Cuba 16-5Closed Anocracy
Flag of Cyprus.svg  Cyprus 10010Full Democracy
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg  Czech Republic 909Democracy
Flag of Denmark.svg  Denmark 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Djibouti.svg  Djibouti 303Open Anocracy
Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg  Dominican Republic 817Democracy
Flag of East Timor.svg  East Timor 918Democracy
Flag of Ecuador.svg  Ecuador 615Open Anocracy
Flag of Egypt.svg  Egypt 04-4Closed Anocracy
Flag of El Salvador.svg  El Salvador 808Democracy
Flag of Equatorial Guinea.svg  Equatorial Guinea 06-6Autocracy
Flag of Eritrea.svg  Eritrea 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Estonia.svg  Estonia 909Democracy
Flag of Ethiopia.svg  Ethiopia 321Open Anocracy
Flag of Fiji.svg  Fiji 404Open Anocracy
Flag of Finland.svg  Finland 10010Full Democracy
Flag of France.svg  France 909Democracy
Flag of Gabon.svg  Gabon 413Open Anocracy
Flag of The Gambia.svg Gambia 404Open Anocracy
Flag of Georgia.svg  Georgia 817Democracy
Flag of Germany.svg  Germany 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Ghana.svg  Ghana 808Democracy
Flag of Greece.svg  Greece 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Guatemala.svg  Guatemala 918Democracy
Flag of Guinea.svg  Guinea 404Open Anocracy
Flag of Guinea-Bissau.svg  Guinea-Bissau 716Democracy
Flag of Guyana.svg  Guyana 817Democracy
Flag of Haiti.svg  Haiti 615Open Anocracy
Flag of Honduras.svg  Honduras 707Democracy
Flag of Hungary.svg  Hungary 10010Full Democracy
Flag of India.svg  India 909Democracy
Flag of Indonesia.svg  Indonesia 909Democracy
Flag of Iran.svg  Iran 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Iraq.svg  Iraq 606Democracy
Flag of Ireland.svg  Ireland 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Israel.svg  Israel 716Democracy
Flag of Italy.svg  Italy 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Cote d'Ivoire.svg  Ivory Coast 514Open Anocracy
Flag of Jamaica.svg  Jamaica 909Democracy
Flag of Japan.svg  Japan 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Jordan.svg  Jordan 25-3Closed Anocracy
Flag of Kazakhstan.svg  Kazakhstan 06-6Autocracy
Flag of Kenya.svg  Kenya 909Democracy
Flag of Kosovo.svg  Kosovo 808Democracy
Flag of Kuwait.svg  Kuwait 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Kyrgyzstan (2023).svg  Kyrgyzstan 808Democracy
Flag of Laos.svg  Laos 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia 808Democracy
Flag of Lebanon.svg  Lebanon 606Democracy
Flag of Lesotho.svg  Lesotho 918Democracy
Flag of Liberia.svg  Liberia 817Democracy
Flag of Lithuania.svg  Lithuania 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Luxembourg.svg  Luxembourg 10010Full Democracy
Flag of North Macedonia.svg Macedonia 909Democracy
Flag of Madagascar.svg  Madagascar 606Democracy
Flag of Malawi.svg  Malawi 606Democracy
Flag of Malaysia.svg  Malaysia 707Democracy
Flag of Mali.svg  Mali 615Open Anocracy
Flag of Mauritania.svg  Mauritania 02-2Closed Anocracy
Flag of Mauritius.svg  Mauritius 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Mexico.svg  Mexico 808Democracy
Flag of Moldova.svg  Moldova 909Democracy
Flag of Mongolia.svg  Mongolia 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Montenegro.svg  Montenegro 909Democracy
Flag of Morocco.svg  Morocco 15-4Closed Anocracy
Flag of Mozambique.svg  Mozambique 615Open Anocracy
Flag of Myanmar.svg  Myanmar 808Democracy
Flag of Namibia.svg  Namibia 606Democracy
Flag of Nepal.svg    Nepal 817Democracy
Flag of the Netherlands.svg  Netherlands 10010Full Democracy
Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Nicaragua.svg  Nicaragua 716Democracy
Flag of Niger.svg  Niger 615Open Anocracy
Flag of Nigeria.svg  Nigeria 817Democracy
Flag of North Korea.svg  North Korea 010-10Autocracy
Flag of Norway.svg  Norway 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Oman.svg  Oman 08-8Autocracy
Flag of Pakistan.svg  Pakistan 707Democracy
Flag of Panama.svg  Panama 909Democracy
Flag of Papua New Guinea.svg  Papua New Guinea 505Open Anocracy
Flag of Paraguay.svg  Paraguay 909Democracy
Flag of Peru.svg  Peru 909Democracy
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines 808Democracy
Flag of Poland.svg  Poland 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Portugal.svg  Portugal 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Qatar.svg  Qatar 010-10Autocracy
Flag of Romania.svg  Romania 909Democracy
Flag of Russia.svg  Russia 514Open Anocracy
Flag of Rwanda.svg  Rwanda 03-3Closed Anocracy
Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg  Saudi Arabia 010-10Autocracy
Flag of Senegal.svg  Senegal 707Democracy
Flag of Serbia.svg  Serbia 918Democracy
Flag of Sierra Leone.svg  Sierra Leone 817Democracy
Flag of Singapore.svg  Singapore 24-2Closed Anocracy
Flag of Slovakia.svg Slovak Republic 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Slovenia.svg  Slovenia 10010Full Democracy
Flag of the Solomon Islands.svg  Solomon Islands 918Democracy
Flag of Somalia.svg  Somalia 505Open Anocracy
Flag of South Africa.svg  South Africa 909Democracy
Flag of South Korea.svg  South Korea 808Democracy
Flag of Spain.svg  Spain 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Sri Lanka.svg  Sri Lanka 716Democracy
Flag of Sudan.svg  Sudan 04-4Closed Anocracy
Flag of Suriname.svg  Suriname 615Open Anocracy
Flag of Eswatini.svg  Eswatini 09-9Autocracy
Flag of Sweden.svg  Sweden 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Switzerland (Pantone).svg   Switzerland 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Syria.svg  Syria 09-9Autocracy
Flag of the Republic of China.svg  Taiwan 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Tajikistan.svg  Tajikistan 14-3Closed Anocracy
Flag of Tanzania.svg  Tanzania 413Open Anocracy
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand 03-3Closed Anocracy
Flag of Togo.svg  Togo 13-2Closed Anocracy
Flag of Trinidad and Tobago.svg  Trinidad and Tobago 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Tunisia.svg  Tunisia 707Democracy
Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey 04-4Closed Anocracy
Flag of Turkmenistan.svg  Turkmenistan 08-8Autocracy
Flag of Uganda.svg  Uganda 12-1Closed Anocracy
Flag of Ukraine.svg  Ukraine 514Open Anocracy
Flag of the United Arab Emirates.svg  United Arab Emirates 08-8Autocracy
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom 808Democracy
Flag of the United States.svg  United States 808Democracy
Flag of Uruguay.svg  Uruguay 10010Full Democracy
Flag of Uzbekistan.svg  Uzbekistan 09-9Autocracy
Flag of Venezuela.svg  Venezuela 14-3Closed Anocracy
Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam 07-7Autocracy
Flag of Zambia.svg  Zambia 606Democracy
Flag of Zimbabwe.svg  Zimbabwe 514Open Anocracy

Criticism

The 2002 paper "Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy" claimed several problems with commonly used democracy rankings, including Polity, opining that the criteria used to determine "democracy" were misleadingly narrow. [13]

The Polity data series has been criticized by Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting for its methodology and determination of what is and isn't a democracy. FAIR has criticized the data series for Americentrism with the United States being shown as the only democracy in the world in 1842, being given a nine out of ten during slavery, and a ten out of ten during the Jim Crow era. The organization has also been critical of the data series for ignoring European colonialism in Africa and Asia with those areas being labeled as no data before the 1960s. FAIR has also been critical of the data series' connection to the Central Intelligence Agency. Max Roser, the founder of Our World in Data, stated that Polity IV was far from perfect and was concerned at the data series' connections with the Central Intelligence Agency. [14]

Seva Gunitsky, an assistant professor at the University of Toronto, wrote in The Washington Post where he stated that "Polity IV measures might be appropriate for research that examines constraints on governing elites, but not for studying the expansion of suffrage over the nineteenth century". Gunitsky was critical of the data series for ignoring suffrage. [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy</span> Form of government

Democracy is a system of government in which state power is vested in the people or the general population of a state. Under a minimalist definition of democracy, rulers are elected through competitive elections while more expansive definitions link democracy to guarantees of civil liberties and human rights in addition to competitive elections.

In political science, a revolution is a rapid, fundamental transformation of a society's state, class, ethnic or religious structures. A revolution involves the attempted change in political regimes, substantial mass mobilization, and efforts to force change through non-institutionalized means.

Autocracy is a system of government in which absolute power is held by the ruler, known as an autocrat. It includes most forms of monarchy and dictatorship, while it is contrasted with democracy and feudalism. Various definitions of autocracy exist. They may restrict autocracy to cases where power is held by a single individual, or they may define autocracy in a way that includes a group of rulers who wield absolute power. The autocrat has total control over the exercise of civil liberties within the autocracy, choosing under what circumstances they may be exercised, if at all. Governments may also blend elements of autocracy and democracy, forming an anocracy. The concept of autocracy has been recognized in political philosophy since ancient times.

In politics, a regime is the form of government or the set of rules, cultural or social norms, etc., that regulate the operation of a government or institution and its interactions with society. The two broad categories of regimes that appear in most literature are democratic and autocratic. However, autocratic regimes can be broken down into a subset of many different types. The key similarity between all regimes are the presence of rulers, and either formal or informal institutions.

In political science, a political system means the type of political organization that can be recognized, observed or otherwise declared by a state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratization</span> Society becoming more democratic

Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction.

A free and fair election is defined by political scientist Robert Dahl as an election in which "coercion is comparatively uncommon". A free and fair election involves political freedoms and fair processes leading up to the vote, a fair count of eligible voters who cast a ballot, and acceptance of election results by all parties. An election may partially meet international standards for free and fair elections, or may meet some standards but not others.

<i>Freedom in the World</i> Annual survey by Freedom House

Freedom in the World is a yearly survey and report by the U.S.-based non-governmental organization Freedom House that measures the degree of civil liberties and political rights in every nation and significant related and disputed territories around the world.

In political science, the waves of democracy or waves of democratization are major surges of democracy that have occurred in history. Although the term appears at least as early as 1887, it was popularized by Samuel P. Huntington, a political scientist at Harvard University, in his article published in the Journal of Democracy and further expounded in his 1991 book, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Democratization waves have been linked to sudden shifts in the distribution of power among the great powers, which created openings and incentives to introduce sweeping domestic reforms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratic transition</span> Specific phase in a political system

A democratic transition describes a phase in a countries political system as a result of an ongoing change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one. The process is known as democratisation, political changes moving in a democratic direction. Democratization waves have been linked to sudden shifts in the distribution of power among the great powers, which created openings and incentives to introduce sweeping domestic reforms. Although transitional regimes experience more civil unrest, they may be considered stable in a transitional phase for decades at a time. Since the end of the Cold War transitional regimes have become the most common form of government. Scholarly analysis of the decorative nature of democratic institutions concludes that the opposite democratic backsliding (autocratization), a transition to authoritarianism is the most prevalent basis of modern hybrid regimes.

Anocracy, or semi-democracy, is a form of government that is loosely defined as part democracy and part dictatorship, or as a "regime that mixes democratic with autocratic features". Another definition classifies anocracy as "a regime that permits some means of participation through opposition group behavior but that has incomplete development of mechanisms to redress grievances." The term "semi-democratic" is reserved for stable regimes that combine democratic and authoritarian elements. Scholars distinguish anocracies from autocracies and democracies in their capability to maintain authority, political dynamics, and policy agendas. Similarly, the regimes have democratic institutions that allow for nominal amounts of competition. Such regimes are particularly susceptible to outbreaks of armed conflict and unexpected or adverse changes in leadership.

A hybrid regime is a type of political system often created as a result of an incomplete democratic transition from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one. Hybrid regimes are categorized as having a combination of autocratic features with democratic ones and can simultaneously hold political repressions and regular elections. Hybrid regimes are commonly found in developing countries with abundant natural resources such as petro-states. Although these regimes experience civil unrest, they may be relatively stable and tenacious for decades at a time. There has been a rise in hybrid regimes since the end of the Cold War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratic backsliding</span> National decline in democracy

Democratic backsliding is a process of regime change toward autocracy that makes the exercise of political power by the public more arbitrary and repressive. This process typically restricts the space for public contestation and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic decline involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.

The V-Dem Institute, founded by Staffan I. Lindberg in 2014, studies the qualities of government. The headquarters of the project is based at the department of political science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

<i>Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy</i> 2017 non-fiction book by Daniel Ziblatt

Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy is a 2017 non-fiction book by Daniel Ziblatt, published by Cambridge University Press, discussing the growth of democratic countries in 19th and 20th century Europe. Ziblatt's thesis is that in those democracies the conservative parties were often crucial on whether a democracy survives: he analysed both Germany and the United Kingdom. Ziblatt argued that if conservative parties were robust they would assist democracy but if they had weaknesses they would impede democracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V-Dem Democracy Indices</span> Measure of the state of democracy by V-Dem Institute

The Democracy Indices by V-Dem are democracy indices published by the V-Dem Institute that describe qualities of different democracies. This dataset is published on an annual basis and is publicly available and free. In particular, the V-Dem dataset is popular among political scientists and describes the characteristics of political regimes worldwide. In total, datasets released by the V-Dem Institute include information on hundreds of indicator variables describing all aspects of government, especially on the quality of democracy, inclusivity, and other economic indicators. An R package automatically bundles new data.

Democracy indices are quantitative and comparative assessments of the state of democracy for different countries according to various definitions of democracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean</span> Overview of democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean

The Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean can be compared according to the different definitions of democracy. The V-Dem Democracy indices considers the Latin American and Caribbean countries with the highest democracy scores in 2023 as Costa Rica, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Jamaica and countries with lowest democracy scores as Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela. Democratic backsliding can be observed in parts of Latin America and the Caribbean. Democratization is reported by V-Dem Democracy Report 2024 in Brazil, Dominican Republic, Honduras and Bolivia.

References

  1. Casper, Gretchen, and Claudiu Tufis. 2003. "Correlation Versus Interchangeability: the Limited Robustness of Empirical Finding on Democracy Using Highly Correlated Data Sets." Political Analysis 11: 196-203.
  2. "Despite global concerns about democracy, more than half of countries are democratic". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2021-07-16.
  3. Hensel, Paul R. (2010). "Review of Available Data Sets". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.418. ISBN   978-0-19-084662-6 . Retrieved 2021-07-16.
  4. Högström, John (2013). "Does the Choice of Democracy Measure Matter? Comparisons between the Two Leading Democracy Indices, Freedom House and Polity IV". Government and Opposition. 48 (2): 201–221. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.10. ISSN   0017-257X. S2CID   19290786.
  5. Coppedge, Michael; Lindberg, Staffan; Skaaning, Svend-Erik; Teorell, Jan (2016). "Measuring high level democratic principles using the V-Dem data". International Political Science Review. 37 (5): 580–593. doi:10.1177/0192512115622046. hdl: 2077/38971 . ISSN   0192-5121. JSTOR   26556873. S2CID   142135251.
  6. Pelke, Lars; Croissant, Aurel (2021). "Conceptualizing and Measuring Autocratization Episodes". Swiss Political Science Review. 27 (2): 434–448. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12437 . ISSN   1662-6370.
  7. Vaccaro, Andrea (2021-03-16). "Comparing measures of democracy: statistical properties, convergence, and interchangeability". European Political Science. 20 (4): 666–684. doi: 10.1057/s41304-021-00328-8 . ISSN   1682-0983.
  8. Boese, Vanessa A (2019-06-01). "How (not) to measure democracy". International Area Studies Review. 22 (2): 95–127. doi:10.1177/2233865918815571. ISSN   2233-8659. S2CID   191935546.
  9. "Polity". Polity. 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
  10. Polity IV Country Report 2010: Canada http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/Canada2010.pdf
  11. "Polity IV Annual Time-Series, 1800-2018" . Retrieved 31 August 2019.
  12. "INSCR Data Page". 2019-06-02.
  13. Gerardo L. Munck, Jay Verkuilen (February 2002), "Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices" (PDF), Comparative Political Studies, 35 (1): 5–34, CiteSeerX   10.1.1.469.3177 , doi:10.1177/001041400203500101, S2CID   73722608
  14. "Vox's CIA-Backed 'Democracy' Standard Is OK With Slavery and Women Not Voting". Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting . May 16, 2016. Archived from the original on July 15, 2021.
  15. "How do you measure 'democracy'?". The Washington Post . June 23, 2015. Archived from the original on July 16, 2021.