This article possibly contains original research .(September 2024) |
Democracy-Dictatorship (DD), [1] index of democracy and dictatorship [2] or simply the DD index [3] or the DD datasets was the binary measure of democracy and dictatorship first proposed by Adam Przeworski et al. (2010), and further developed and maintained by Cheibub, Gandhi, and Vreeland (2009). [4] Note that the most recent dataset was updated 2008.
Based on the regime binary classification idea proposed by Alvarez in 1996, [5] and the Democracy and Development (or DD measure, ACLP dataset) proposed by Przeworski et al. (2010), Cheibub, Gandhi, and Vreeland developed a six-fold regime classification scheme, resulting what the authors called as the DD datasets. [1] : 68
The DD dataset covers the annual data points of 199 countries from 1946 (or date of independence) to 2008. [1] : 68 The figures at the left show the results in 1988 and 2008.
The DD index first classifies the regimes into two types: democracies and dictatorships. For democracies, it categorizes them into three types: parliamentary, semi-presidential and presidential democracies. For dictatorships, monarchic, military and civilian dictatorship. [1] " Based on a "minimalist" theory of democracy, the index relies on rules regarding the existence of competitive elections. [1] [3] Resorting to democratic concepts by Karl Popper and Joseph Schumpeter, Przeworski defended the minimalist approach, citing Popper that "the only system in which citizens can get rid of governments without bloodshed." [6]
For a regime to be considered as a democracy by the DD scheme, it must meet the requirement of four rules below: [1] : 69 [3]
- The chief executive must be chosen by popular election or by a body that was itself popularly elected.
- The legislature must be popularly elected.
- There must be more than one party competing in the elections.
- An alternation in power under electoral rules identical to the ones that brought the incumbent to office must have taken place.
Some regimes may meet the first three rules, but lack an alternation in power in its historical past; these regimes are classified as dictatorships because of cases where the incumbent only allows elections as long as they keep winning, and would refuse to step down if they lost. However, since they might also give up power willingly, the regime is marked with a type II value to signal potential classification errors where a democratic regime may be falsely classified as dictatorship. [1] : 70 . This does not indicate cases of semi-democracy or semi-dictatorship. [1] : 71 . The authors acknowledged that the last rule is more complicated to implement, but stated that it helps researchers to control potential errors and removes subjective judgement from the classification. [1] : 70
The Democracy-Dictatorship Index has the main regime types of "democracy" and "dictatorship" and three sub-types for each as well. Democracies can be either parliamentary, semi-presidential, or presidential and dictatorships can be civilian, military, or royal. Many countries which are seen as otherwise democratic are dictatorships because there has yet to be an alternation in power since their incumbent government has never lost an election. Therefore, it is impossible to know if the regime is a democracy or a dictatorship, so DD Index considers them dictatorships until an alternation in power occurs.
Regime | Type | Subtype | Reason for Dictatorship [7] |
---|---|---|---|
Afghanistan | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Albania | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Algeria | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Andorra | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Angola | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected |
Antigua and Barbuda | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Argentina | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Armenia | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Australia | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Austria | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Azerbaijan | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Bahamas | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Bahrain | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. No parties |
Bangladesh | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. No Legislature 3. No legislative parties |
Barbados | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Belarus | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Belgium | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Belize | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Benin | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Bhutan | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Bolivia | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected |
Botswana | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Brazil | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Brunei | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature not elected 3. One party |
Bulgaria | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Burkina Faso | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Burundi | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Cambodia | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 3. No legislative parties |
Cameroon | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Canada | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Cape Verde | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Central African Republic | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Chad | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Chile | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
China | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 3. All parties are in regime |
Colombia | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Comoros | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Congo | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Costa Rica | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Ivory Coast | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | |
Croatia | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Cuba | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Cyprus | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Czech Republic | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
DR Congo | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Denmark | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Djibouti | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 3. One legislative party |
Dominica | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Dominican Republic | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
East Timor | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Ecuador | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Egypt | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
El Salvador | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Equatorial Guinea | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Eritrea | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature not elected 3. All parties banned 4. No alternation in power |
Estonia | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Ethiopia | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 3. All parties are in regime 4. No alternation in power |
Fiji | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. No Legislature 3. No Legislative parties |
Finland | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
France | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Gabon | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Gambia | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Georgia | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Germany | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Ghana | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Greece | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Grenada | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Guatemala | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Guinea | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected |
Guinea-Bissau | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Guyana | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Haiti | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Honduras | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Hungary | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Iceland | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
India | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Indonesia | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Iran | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | |
Iraq | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | All parties in regime |
Ireland | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Israel | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Italy | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Jamaica | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Japan | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Jordan | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected |
Kazakhstan | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Kenya | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Kiribati | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Kuwait | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 3. All parties legally banned |
Kyrgyzstan | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Laos | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 3. Legally single party state |
Latvia | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Lebanon | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Lesotho | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Liberia | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Libya | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature is appointed 3. No parties |
Liechtenstein | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Lithuania | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Luxembourg | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Macedonia | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Madagascar | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Malawi | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Malaysia | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 3. All parties in regime 4. No alternation in power |
Maldives | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Mali | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Malta | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Marshall Islands | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Mauritania | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. No Legislature 3. No Legislative parties |
Mauritius | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Mexico | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Micronesia | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Moldova | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Mongolia | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Montenegro | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship[ clarification needed ] | 4. No alternation in power |
Morocco | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected |
Mozambique | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Myanmar | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. No Legislature 3. No Legislative parties |
Namibia | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Nauru | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Nepal | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Netherlands | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
New Zealand | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Nicaragua | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | |
Niger | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Nigeria | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
North Korea | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected |
Norway | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Oman | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature is closed 3. No Legislative parties |
Pakistan | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Palau | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Panama | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Papua New Guinea | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Paraguay | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Peru | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Philippines | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Poland | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Portugal | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Qatar | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature not elected 3. No Legislative parties |
Romania | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Russia | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Rwanda | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Samoa | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
San Marino | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
São Tomé and Príncipe | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Saudi Arabia | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature not elected 3. No Legislative parties |
Senegal | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Serbia | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Seychelles | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Sierra Leone | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Singapore | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Slovakia | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Slovenia | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Solomon Islands | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Somalia | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 2. Legislature not elected 3. No Legislative parties |
South Africa | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
South Korea | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Spain | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Sri Lanka | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Saint Lucia | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Sudan | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature not elected |
Suriname | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Swaziland | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 3. Legally single party state |
Sweden | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Switzerland | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Syria | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 3. All parties in regime |
Taiwan | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
Tajikistan | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Tanzania | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Thailand | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Togo | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Tonga | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. Legislature not elected 3. All parties legally banned 4. No alternation in power |
Trinidad and Tobago | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Tunisia | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Turkey | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Turkmenistan | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 3. Legally one party state |
Tuvalu | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Uganda | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Ukraine | Democracy | Semi-Presidential Democracy | |
United Arab Emirates | Dictatorship | Royal Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 2. No Legislature 3. No Legislative parties |
United Kingdom | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
United States | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Uruguay | Democracy | Presidential Democracy | |
Uzbekistan | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 3. One party 4. No alternation in power |
Vanuatu | Democracy | Parliamentary Democracy | |
Venezuela | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 4. No alternation in power |
Vietnam | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 1. Executive not elected 3. One party |
Yemen | Dictatorship | Military Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Zambia | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Zimbabwe | Dictatorship | Civilian Dictatorship | 4. No alternation in power |
Democracies are classified by the rules in which executives can be appointed or removed and can be either presidential, mixed or semi-presidential, or parliamentary. [1] [8] : 454 It is important to note that these names do not have to correspond to the official or colloquial titles of any of the countries offices. For example, DD could classify a country which has a legislative assembly whose official name is "the parliament" but still classify it in any of the three categories. The classification depends on the rules outlining the relationship between a country's government, legislative assembly (often called the legislature), and head of state. [8] : 454 The government composes the chief executive and the heads of the executive departments. The chief executive can take many titles including chancellor, prime minister, or premier and the heads of the executive departments can bear different titles and be called different things. In the United Kingdom, for example, the chief executive is the prime minister, and the ministers are the heads of the executive departments, which together compose the government.
The first distinction made is whether a country has a government has legislative responsibility, i.e. whether a majority vote in the legislature can remove the sitting government without cause. The required majority needed to remove the sitting government varies between countries but is termed a vote of no confidence. [8] : 455 Some countries (such as Spain, Belgium, Germany, and Israel) require that the vote of no confidence also specify who is going to replace the sitting government to minimize the time without an interim government, essentially replacing one government with another. This type of vote is termed a constructive vote of no confidence. [8] : 455 Sometimes sitting governments will attach a vote of no confidence clause to a piece of legislation they want passed, effectively tying the survival of the government on the piece of legislation. [8] : 456
The second distinction made is whether the head of state is popularly elected for a fixed term. The head of state may be unelected and still be classified as a democracy. [1] Popularly elected means that the head of state is directly elected by the citizens or elected by an assembly which then elects them (an example being the electoral college in the United States). In Germany, the head of state is elected by regional legislatures and not popularly elected. [8] : 457 Elected heads of state are usually referred to as "president." The phrase "fixed term" indicates the once the head of state is chosen, they serve a known and a limited number of years before another election is held, and they cannot be removed from the office in the meantime via a vote of no confidence. [8] : 456
The head of state in most parliamentary democracies formally appoint the head of government. [8] : 465 Some countries, such as Greece and Bulgaria, stipulate who the head of state chooses as head of government. In the former, for example, the President must appoint as Prime Minister the leader of the largest party in parliament, who has three days to gain the confidence of a majority thereof.
Some countries, such as Sweden, instead charge another person entirely with choosing the head of government, such as the presiding officer of the legislative assembly.
The first distinction made is whether a democracy's government is responsible to the legislature. If it is not responsible, it is a presidential democracy. If it is, then a further distinction is made between democracies where the head of state is popularly elected and those where the head of state is not popularly elected. If the head of state is popularly elected for a fixed term then, the democracy is mixed or semi-presidential. If the head of state serves for life or is not popularly elected or a fixed term, then the democracy is parliamentary. [1]
The table below offers a full list of which countries are what type of democracy. Keep note that the head of state, chief executive, government, and legislatures can have their official names be seemingly contradictory to this classification. The name a democracy gives itself or its office does not indicate what type of democracy it is.
A presidential democracy has a government that does not need the majority support of a legislature to stay in power. A semi-presidential (mixed) democracy has a government that needs the majority of support from a legislature to exist and whose head of state is popularly elected for a fixed term. Parliamentary democracy is the same as semi-presidential but has heads of state which are not popularly elected for a fixed term, typically either monarchs or officials not chosen by popular elections. [8] : 457
The DD dataset is limited to 199 countries after 1946, whereas Boix, Miller, & Rosato, 2013 proposed a data set from 1800 to 2007, covering 219 countries. The 2010 version of Polity data series covers 189 countries from 1800 to 2009. [9]
Gugiu & Centellas developed the Democracy Cluster Classification Index that integrates five democracy indicators (including the DD dataset, Polity dataset), clustering 24 American and 39 European regimes over 30 years. [2]
Politics of the Democratic Republic of Congo take place in the framework of a republic in transition from a civil war to a semi-presidential republic.
A government is the system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state.
The politics of Indonesia take place in the framework of a presidential representative democratic republic whereby the President of Indonesia is both head of state and head of government and of a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government. Legislative power is vested in both the government and the bicameral People's Consultative Assembly. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature.
Politics of Lithuania takes place in a framework of a unitary semi-presidential representative democratic republic, whereby the president of Lithuania is the head of state and the prime minister of Lithuania is the head of government, and of a multi-party system.
A legislature is a deliberative assembly with the legal authority to make laws for a political entity such as a country, nation or city on behalf of the people therein. They are often contrasted with the executive and judicial powers of government. Legislatures can exist at different levels of government–national, state/provincial/regional, local, even supranational. Countries differ as to what extent they grant deliberative assemblies at the subnational law-making power, as opposed to purely administrative responsibilities.
The Politics of Benin take place in the framework of a presidential representative democratic republic, wherein the President of Benin is both head of state and head of government, and of a multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the government. Legislative power is vested in both the government and the legislature. The Judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature. The current political system is derived from the 1990 Constitution of Benin and the subsequent transition to democracy in 1991. The Economist Intelligence Unit rated Benin a "hybrid regime" in 2022.
A presidential system, or single executive system, is a form of government in which a head of government, typically with the title of president, leads an executive branch that is separate from the legislative branch in systems that use separation of powers. This system was first introduced in the United States.
A semi-presidential republic, or dual executive republic, is a republic in which a president exists alongside a prime minister and a cabinet, with the latter two being responsible to the legislature of the state. It differs from a parliamentary republic in that it has an executive president independent of the legislature; and from the presidential system in that the cabinet, although named by the president, is responsible to the legislature, which may force the cabinet to resign through a motion of no confidence.
In political science, a political system means the form of political organization that can be observed, recognised or otherwise declared by a society or state.
Cohabitation is a system of divided government that occurs in semi-presidential systems, such as France, whenever the president is from a different political party than the majority of the members of parliament. It occurs because such a system forces the president to name a premier who will be acceptable to the majority party within parliament. Thus, cohabitation occurs because of the duality of the executive: an independently elected president and a prime minister who must be acceptable both to the president and to the legislature.
The dissolution of a legislative assembly is the simultaneous termination of service of all of its members, in anticipation that a successive legislative assembly will reconvene later with possibly different members. In a democracy, the new assembly is chosen by a general election. Dissolution is distinct on the one hand from abolition of the assembly, and on the other hand from its adjournment or prorogation, or the ending of a legislative session, any of which begins a period of inactivity after which it is anticipated that the same members will reassemble. For example, the "second session of the fifth parliament" could be followed by the "third session of the fifth parliament" after a prorogation, but would be followed by the "first session of the sixth parliament" after a dissolution.
Adam Przeworski is a Polish-American professor of political science specializing in comparative politics. He is Carroll and Milton Professor Emeritus in the Department of Politics of New York University. He is a scholar of democratic societies, theory of democracy, social democracy and political economy, as well as an early proponent of rational choice theory in political science.
A parliamentary republic is a republic that operates under a parliamentary system of government where the executive branch derives its legitimacy from and is accountable to the legislature. There are a number of variations of parliamentary republics. Most have a clear differentiation between the head of government and the head of state, with the head of government holding real power and the head of state being a ceremonial position, similar to constitutional monarchies. In some countries the head of state has reserve powers to use at their discretion as a non-partisan "referee" of the political process. Some have combined the roles of head of state and head of government, much like presidential systems, but with a dependency upon parliamentary confidence.
The Democracy Index published by the Economist Group is an index measuring the quality of democracy across the world. This quantitative and comparative assessment is centrally concerned with democratic rights and democratic institutions. The methodology for assessing democracy used in this democracy index is according to Economist Intelligence Unit which is part of the Economist Group, a UK-based private company, which publishes the weekly newspaper The Economist. The index is based on 60 indicators grouped into five categories, measuring pluralism, civil liberties, and political culture. In addition to a numeric score and a ranking, the index categorizes each country into one of four regime types: full democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes, and authoritarian regimes. The first Democracy Index report was published in 2006. Reports were published every two years until 2010 and annually thereafter. The index includes 167 countries and territories, of which 166 are sovereign states and 164 are UN member states. Other democracy indices with similar assessments of the state of democracy include V-Dem Democracy indices or Bertelsmann Transformation Index.
Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in democracy, separation of powers, civil liberties, and the rule of law. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have some times been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.
The Madisonian model is a structure of government in which the powers of the government are separated into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. This came about because the delegates saw the need to structure the government in such a way to prevent the imposition of tyranny by either majority or minority. James Madison proposed this governmental scheme so that the power and influence of each branch would be balanced by those of the others. The separation of powers is a result of Congress passing laws, the president enforcing laws, and the courts interpreting the laws. The three branches of government are independent from each other, yet cooperate by necessity. In the Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison illustrated his beliefs on how a balance in the power was necessary for a government to exist.
A unitary parliamentary republic is a unitary state with a republican form of government in which the political power is vested in and entrusted to the parliament with confidence by its electorate.
Semi-parliamentary system can refer to one of the following:
Democracy indices are quantitative and comparative assessments of the state of democracy for different countries according to various definitions of democracy.
Specifically, the DD index (for Democracy and Dictatorship) assesses the United States as a democracy from 1946, the first measured, through 2008, the last year of measurement. ... My definition of a democracy is minimalist, like the DD definition of Cheibub, Gadhi, and Vreeland (2010), but it adds a dimension. Like DD, it considers the presence of contested elections a necessary condition of ....