Reading | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | Berkshire |
1295–1950 | |
Seats | Two until 1885, then one until 1950 |
Replaced by | Reading North and Reading South |
1955–1974 | |
Seats | One |
Type of constituency | Borough constituency |
Created from | Reading North and Reading South |
Replaced by | Reading North and Reading South |
Reading was a parliamentary borough, and later a borough constituency in England, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of England until 1707, the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800, and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1950 and 1955 to 1974. Until 1885, the constituency comprised the town of Reading in the county of Berkshire; after 1885, it was centred on the town but the exact boundaries differed.
From 1295, as a parliamentary borough, Reading elected two members of parliament (MPs). Under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, this representation was reduced to a single MP.
Reading was one of the boroughs summoned to send members to the Model Parliament. The boundaries (encompassing the whole of one parish and parts of two others) were effectively unchanged from 1295 to 1918. In 1831, the population of the borough was 15,935, and contained 3,307 houses.
The right to vote was exercised by all inhabitants paying scot and lot, a relatively wide franchise for the period, and almost 2,000 votes were cast at the general election of 1826. Despite this high electorate, the corporation of the town was generally considered in practice to control elections to a large extent. In the second half of the 18th century, Reading was notoriously one of the most corrupt constituencies in England, bribery being both routine and expensive: Namier quotes the accounts kept for Prime Minister Newcastle of the 1754 election, which note that John Dodd, the government's candidate there, had already received £1000 and was promised £500 or £600 more to help him win the seat. [1] (Dodd lost by one vote, but had the result overturned on petition by a partisan vote in the House of Commons, and Newcastle's accounts show a continuing trickle of funds to him to nurse the constituency over the next few years.) A few years later, the nomination to one of Reading's seats was advertised for sale in a London newspaper, though Reading was not mentioned by name and no price was specified; the newspaper's printers were charged by the Commons with a breach of privilege, but the sale of seats remained legal if frowned-upon until 1809.
The Great Reform Act left Reading's representation and boundaries unchanged, and the reformed franchise far from increasing its electorate seems to have reduced it: it was estimated that there were 1,250 voters in 1831, but only 1,001 were registered for the first post-Reform election, that of 1832.
The Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, coming into effect at the 1885 general election, reduced the representation of the parliamentary borough to a single MP. The single-member Reading constituency continued to exist until it was split in 1950 into the separate constituencies of Reading North and Reading South. These two constituencies were merged back into a single Reading constituency in 1955, but again split apart in 1974; despite its name, the 1955 constituency did not contain the whole of the County Borough of Reading, with one ward being included in both of the Newbury and Wokingham seats.
After 1885, the constituency was marginal, regularly changing hands between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Party up to 1918, then between the Conservatives and Labour.
Today the area formerly covered by the Reading constituency is within the constituencies of Reading East and Reading West, which will be replaced by the constituencies of Reading Central, Reading West and Mid Berkshire, and Earley and Woodley at the 2024 general election.
Minor expansion - see map on Vision of Britain website. [3]
Boundaries extended to the south and west (gained from the Newbury and Wokingham Divisions), and to the north of the River Thames with the annexation of the Urban District of Caversham (part of the Henley Division of Oxfordshire) by Reading County Borough.
For the 1950 general election, Reading was abolished as a single-member Parliamentary borough and split between the two new borough constituencies of Reading North and Reading South.
For the 1955 general election, Reading was re-established, replacing Reading North and Reading South and comprising:
The East and Tilehurst wards were included in the Wokingham and Newbury constituencies respectively.
From the 1964 general election, a revision to the County Borough wards resulted in minor changes. The constituency now comprised:
The constituency was abolished once again for the 1974 general election. The Christchurch, Redlands and Whitley wards were included in the re-established constituency of Reading South, with remaining wards being included in Reading North.
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1955 | Constituency recreated | ||
1955 | Ian Mikardo | Labour | |
1959 | Peter Emery | Conservative | |
1966 | John Lee | Labour | |
1970 | Gerard Vaughan | Conservative | |
Feb 1974 | Constituency redivided into Reading North and Reading South |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Fyshe Palmer | 522 | 36.1 | ||
Tory | Charles Russell | 471 | 32.6 | ||
Whig | Stephen Lushington | 452 | 31.3 | ||
Turnout | 907 | c. 72.6 | |||
Registered electors | c. 1,250 | ||||
Majority | 51 | 3.5 | |||
Whig hold | Swing | ||||
Majority | 19 | 1.3 | |||
Tory hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Fyshe Palmer | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Charles Russell | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | c. 1,250 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Fyshe Palmer | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Charles Russell | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,001 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Thomas Talfourd | 643 | 43.8 | ||
Conservative | Charles Russell | 441 | 30.0 | ||
Whig | Benjamin Oliveira | 384 | 26.2 | ||
Turnout | 960 | 95.8 | |||
Registered electors | 1,002 | ||||
Majority | 202 | 13.8 | |||
Radical gain from Whig | |||||
Majority | 57 | 3.8 | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radical | Thomas Talfourd | 468 | 34.1 | −9.7 | |
Whig | Charles Fyshe Palmer | 457 | 33.3 | +7.1 | |
Conservative | Charles Russell | 448 | 32.6 | +2.6 | |
Turnout | 875 | 84.5 | −11.3 | ||
Registered electors | 1,035 | ||||
Majority | 11 | 0.8 | −13.0 | ||
Radical hold | Swing | −5.5 | |||
Majority | 9 | 0.7 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +2.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Russell | 570 | 29.4 | +13.1 | |
Conservative | Henry Cadogan | 564 | 29.1 | +12.8 | |
Whig | Thomas Mills | 410 | 21.1 | +4.5 | |
Whig | William Tooke | 397 | 20.5 | +3.9 | |
Majority | 154 | 8.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 984 | 82.4 | −2.1 | ||
Registered electors | 1,194 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +4.5 | |||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +4.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Francis Pigott | 614 | 29.1 | +8.0 | |
Radical | Thomas Talfourd | 596 | 28.3 | +7.8 | |
Conservative | Charles Russell | 521 | 24.7 | −4.7 | |
Conservative | Henry Cadogan | 376 | 17.8 | −11.3 | |
Turnout | 1,054 (est) | 84.2 (est) | +1.8 | ||
Registered electors | 1,251 | ||||
Majority | 238 | 11.3 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | +8.0 | |||
Majority | 75 | 3.6 | N/A | ||
Radical gain from Conservative | Swing | +7.9 | |||
Talfourd resigned after being appointed a judge of the Court of Common Pleas, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Frederick Stanford | 507 | 51.8 | +9.3 | |
Whig | George Bowyer [22] | 364 | 37.2 | +8.1 | |
Radical | Thomas Norton [23] [24] | 107 | 10.9 | −17.4 | |
Majority | 143 | 14.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 978 | 74.7 | −9.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,309 | ||||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +13.4 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Francis Pigott | 753 | 39.6 | +10.5 | |
Whig | Henry Singer Keating | 631 | 33.2 | +4.9 | |
Conservative | Samuel Auchmuty Dickson [25] | 518 | 27.2 | −15.3 | |
Majority | 113 | 6.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 951 (est) | 68.0 (est) | −16.2 | ||
Registered electors | 1,399 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +9.1 | |||
Whig gain from Radical | Swing | +6.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Francis Pigott | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Henry Singer Keating | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 1,431 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig hold | |||||
Keating was appointed Solicitor General for England and Wales, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Henry Singer Keating | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Francis Pigott | 761 | 38.6 | |
Liberal | Henry Singer Keating | 666 | 33.8 | |
Conservative | Ralph Augustus Benson | 544 | 27.6 | |
Majority | 122 | 6.2 | ||
Turnout | 986 (est) | 67.9 (est) | ||
Registered electors | 1,451 | |||
Liberal hold | ||||
Liberal hold | ||||
Keating was appointed Solicitor General for England and Wales, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Singer Keating | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold | |||||
Keating resigned after being appointed a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Francis Goldsmid | 661 | 54.5 | −17.9 | |
Conservative | Ralph Augustus Benson [26] | 551 | 45.5 | +17.9 | |
Majority | 110 | 9.0 | +2.8 | ||
Turnout | 1,212 | 80.5 | +12.6 | ||
Registered electors | 1,506 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −17.9 | |||
Pigott resigned after being appointed Lieutenant Governor of the Isle of Man, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Gillery Pigott | 586 | 57.4 | −15.0 | |
Conservative | Edward Walter [27] | 435 | 42.6 | +15.0 | |
Majority | 151 | 14.8 | +8.6 | ||
Turnout | 1,021 | 67.8 | −0.1 | ||
Registered electors | 1,506 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −15.0 | |||
Pigott resigned after being appointed a Judge of the Court of the Exchequer, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Francis Goldsmid | 727 | 38.6 | 0.0 | |
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | 714 | 37.9 | +4.1 | |
Conservative | Stephen Tucker [28] | 444 | 23.6 | −4.0 | |
Majority | 270 | 14.3 | +8.1 | ||
Turnout | 1,165 (est) | 65.8 (est) | −2.1 | ||
Registered electors | 1,769 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +2.0 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Shaw-Lefevre was appointed a Civil Lord of the Admiralty, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Francis Goldsmid | 1,629 | 38.5 | −0.1 | |
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | 1,618 | 38.3 | +0.4 | |
Conservative | Robert Carden | 979 | 23.2 | −0.4 | |
Majority | 639 | 15.1 | +0.8 | ||
Turnout | 2,603 (est) | 80.6 (est) | +14.8 | ||
Registered electors | 3,228 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.1 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | 1,794 | 26.1 | −12.2 | |
Liberal | Francis Goldsmid | 1,791 | 26.1 | −12.4 | |
Conservative | Richard Attenborough [29] | 1,652 | 24.1 | +12.5 | |
Conservative | William Dalziel Mackenzie [30] | 1,631 | 23.7 | +12.1 | |
Majority | 139 | 2.0 | −13.1 | ||
Turnout | 3,434 (est) | 83.4 (est) | +2.8 | ||
Registered electors | 4,118 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −12.3 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −12.4 | |||
Goldsmid's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Palmer | 2,223 | 58.7 | +6.5 | |
Conservative | Richard Attenborough | 1,565 | 41.3 | −6.5 | |
Majority | 658 | 17.4 | +15.4 | ||
Turnout | 3,788 | 80.2 | −3.2 | ||
Registered electors | 4,721 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +6.5 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Palmer | 2,513 | 36.6 | +10.5 | |
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | 2,286 | 33.3 | +7.2 | |
Conservative | Albert George Sandeman [31] | 2,067 | 30.1 | −17.7 | |
Majority | 219 | 3.2 | +1.2 | ||
Turnout | 4,580 (est) | 89.7 (est) | +6.3 | ||
Registered electors | 5,107 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +9.7 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | +8.1 | |||
Lefevre was appointed First Commissioner of Works and Public Buildings, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Townshend Murdoch | 3,518 | 50.9 | +20.8 | |
Liberal | George Shaw-Lefevre | 3,389 | 49.1 | −20.8 | |
Majority | 129 | 1.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,907 | 91.9 | +2.2 (est) | ||
Registered electors | 7,515 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +20.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Townshend Murdoch | 3,378 | 50.9 | 0.0 | |
Liberal | William Berkeley Monck [33] | 3,262 | 49.1 | 0.0 | |
Majority | 116 | 1.8 | 0.0 | ||
Turnout | 6,640 | 88.4 | −3.5 | ||
Registered electors | 7,515 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | 0.0 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Palmer | 3,990 | 51.9 | +2.8 | |
Conservative | Charles Townshend Murdoch | 3,700 | 48.1 | −2.8 | |
Majority | 290 | 3.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,690 | 91.1 | +2.7 | ||
Registered electors | 8,438 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +2.8 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Townshend Murdoch | 4,278 | 52.1 | +4.0 | |
Liberal | George Palmer | 3,927 | 47.9 | −4.0 | |
Majority | 351 | 4.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,205 | 90.1 | −1.0 | ||
Registered electors | 9,104 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +4.0 | |||
Murdoch's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Palmer | 4,600 | 52.4 | +4.5 | |
Conservative | Charles Edward Keyser | 3,906 | 44.5 | −7.6 | |
Social Democratic Federation | Harry Quelch | 270 | 3.1 | New | |
Majority | 694 | 7.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,776 | 91.7 | +1.6 | ||
Registered electors | 9,573 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +6.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | George Palmer | 4,592 | 51.3 | +3.4 | |
Conservative | Charles Edward Keyser | 4,353 | 48.7 | −3.4 | |
Majority | 239 | 2.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,945 | 88.1 | −2.0 | ||
Registered electors | 10,152 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +3.4 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Rufus Isaacs | 4,770 | 51.2 | -0.1 | |
Conservative | Charles Edward Keyser | 4,540 | 48.8 | +0.1 | |
Majority | 230 | 2.4 | -0.2 | ||
Turnout | 9,310 | 83.5 | −4.6 | ||
Registered electors | 11,151 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | -0.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Rufus Isaacs | 5,407 | 53.4 | +2.1 | |
Conservative | George Horace Johnstone | 4,710 | 46.6 | -2.1 | |
Majority | 697 | 6.8 | + +4.2 | ||
Turnout | 10,117 | 91.6 | +3.5 | ||
Registered electors | 11,041 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +2.1 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Rufus Isaacs | 5,264 | 51.0 | −2.4 | |
Liberal Unionist | Leslie Renton | 5,057 | 49.0 | +2.4 | |
Majority | 207 | 2.0 | −4.8 | ||
Turnout | 10,321 | 93.7 | +2.1 | ||
Registered electors | 11,016 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −2.4 | |||
Isaacs is appointed Solicitor General of England and Wales, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Rufus Isaacs | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Rufus Isaacs | 5,094 | 50.5 | −0.5 | |
Conservative | Leslie Orme Wilson | 4,995 | 49.5 | +0.5 | |
Majority | 99 | 1.0 | −1.0 | ||
Turnout | 10,089 | 91.6 | −2.1 | ||
Registered electors | 11,016 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −0.5 | |||
Issacs is appointed Lord Chief Justice of England and is elevated to the peerage as Lord Reading, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Leslie Orme Wilson | 5,144 | 50.3 | +0.8 | |
Liberal | George Peabody Gooch | 4,013 | 39.3 | −11.2 | |
British Socialist Party | Joseph George Butler | 1,063 | 10.4 | New | |
Majority | 1,131 | 11.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 10,220 | 92.2 | +0.6 | ||
Registered electors | 11,088 | ||||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +6.0 | |||
A General Election was due to take place by the end of 1915. By the summer of 1914, the following candidates had been adopted to contest that election. Due to the outbreak of war, the election never took place.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Leslie Orme Wilson | 15,204 | 53.9 | +4.4 |
Labour | Thomas Charles Morris | 8,410 | 29.8 | New | |
Liberal | Frederick Thoresby | 3,143 | 11.1 | −39.4 | |
National Socialist Party | Lorenzo Quelch | 1,462 | 5.2 | New | |
Majority | 6,794 | 24.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 28,219 | 62.2 | −29.4 | ||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +21.9 | |||
Cindicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Edward Cadogan | 16,082 | 42.7 | -11.2 | |
Labour | Derwent Hall Caine | 14,322 | 38.1 | +8.3 | |
Liberal | Henry Delacombe Roome | 7,212 | 19.2 | +8.1 | |
Majority | 1,760 | 4.6 | -19.5 | ||
Turnout | 37,616 | ||||
Unionist hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Somerville Hastings | 16,657 | 44.8 | +6.7 | |
Unionist | Edward Cadogan | 15,115 | 40.7 | -2.0 | |
Liberal | Frederick Maddison | 5,406 | 14.5 | -4.7 | |
Majority | 1,542 | 4.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 37,178 | 82.1 | |||
Labour gain from Unionist | Swing | +4.3 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Herbert Williams | 21,338 | 53.8 | +13.1 | |
Labour | Somerville Hastings | 18,337 | 46.2 | +1.4 | |
Majority | 3,001 | 7.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 39,675 | 85.8 | +3.7 | ||
Unionist gain from Labour | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Somerville Hastings | 23,281 | 43.5 | -2.7 | |
Unionist | Herbert Williams | 22,429 | 42.0 | -11.8 | |
Liberal | Dugald Macfadyen | 7,733 | 14.5 | New | |
Majority | 852 | 1.5 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 53,443 | 85.0 | -0.8 | ||
Labour gain from Unionist | Swing | +4.5 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alfred Howitt | 34,439 | 63.1 | +21.1 | |
Labour | Somerville Hastings | 19,277 | 35.3 | -8.2 | |
New Party | ER Troward | 861 | 1.6 | New | |
Majority | 15,162 | 27.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 54,577 | 83.9 | -1.1 | ||
Conservative gain from Labour | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alfred Howitt | 27,540 | 51.8 | -9.3 | |
Labour | Somerville Hastings | 22,949 | 43.2 | +7.9 | |
Liberal | John William Todd | 2,685 | 5.0 | New | |
Majority | 4,591 | 8.6 | -19.2 | ||
Turnout | 53,174 | 79.1 | -4.8 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
General Election 1939–40: Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1940. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the Autumn of 1939, the following candidates had been selected;
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Ian Mikardo | 30,465 | 48.8 | +5.6 | |
Conservative | William Ewart Clarke McIlroy | 24,075 | 38.6 | -13.2 | |
Liberal | Robert Nevill Tronchin James | 7,834 | 12.6 | +7.6 | |
Majority | 6,390 | 10.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 62,374 | 73.5 | -5.6 | ||
Labour gain from Conservative | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | Ian Mikardo | 25,228 | 50.24 | ||
Conservative | Frederic Bennett | 24,990 | 49.76 | ||
Majority | 238 | 0.48 | |||
Turnout | 50,218 | 84.15 | |||
Registered electors | 59,678 | ||||
Labour win (new seat) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Peter Emery | 26,314 | 54.05 | +4.29 | |
Labour | Ian Mikardo | 22,372 | 45.95 | -4.29 | |
Majority | 3,942 | 8.10 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 48,686 | 82.84 | -1.31 | ||
Registered electors | 58,772 | ||||
Conservative gain from Labour | Swing | +4.29 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Peter Emery | 20,815 | 43.93 | -10.12 | |
Labour | John Lee | 20,805 | 43.91 | -2.04 | |
Liberal | Michael F Burns | 5,759 | 12.16 | New | |
Majority | 10 | 0.02 | -8.08 | ||
Turnout | 47,379 | 79.80 | -3.04 | ||
Registered electors | 59,371 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | -4.04 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | John Lee | 25,338 | 51.01 | +7.10 | |
Conservative | Peter Emery | 21,205 | 42.69 | -1.24 | |
Liberal | Ernest H Palfrey | 3,127 | 6.30 | -5.86 | |
Majority | 4,133 | 8.32 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 49,670 | 84.00 | +4.20 | ||
Registered electors | 59,132 | ||||
Labour gain from Conservative | Swing | +4.17 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Gerard Vaughan | 23,598 | 50.31 | +7.62 | |
Labour | John Lee | 22,444 | 47.85 | -3.16 | |
Democratic Party | Alec Boothroyd | 867 | 1.85 | New | |
Majority | 1,154 | 2.46 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 46,909 | 74.04 | -9.96 | ||
Registered electors | 63,359 | ||||
Conservative gain from Labour | Swing | +5.39 | |||
Reading East is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2017 by Matt Rodda, of the Labour Party. The seat is one of two Labour seats from a total of eight seats in Berkshire.
Whitley is a suburb of the town of Reading, in the county of Berkshire, England. It is also an electoral ward of the Borough of Reading.
Newbury is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament from 2019 by Laura Farris, a Conservative. It was created by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 and has been in continual existence since then.
Wokingham is a constituency in Berkshire represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom since 1987 by John Redwood, a Conservative.
Henley is a constituency in Oxfordshire represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2008 by John Howell, a Member of Parliament from the Conservative Party.
South Shields is a borough constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elects one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election. It has been represented by Emma Lewell-Buck of the Labour Party since 2013.
Cambridge is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2015 by Daniel Zeichner of the Labour Party.
Lichfield is a constituency in Staffordshire represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since its 1997 recreation by Michael Fabricant, a Conservative.
Bedford is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2017 by Mohammad Yasin of the Labour Party.
Harwich was a parliamentary constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom until its abolition for the 2010 general election.
Windsor (/ˈwɪnzə/) is a constituency in Berkshire represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2005 by Adam Afriyie of the Conservative Party. It was re-created for the 1997 general election after it was abolished following the 1970 general election and replaced by the Windsor and Maidenhead constituency.
Reading South was a borough constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election. The constituency covered an area in and around the town of Reading in the county of Berkshire.
Reading North was a borough constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election. The constituency covered an area in and around the town of Reading in the county of Berkshire.
Greenwich was a constituency in south-east London, which returned at first two, then one member (MP) to the House of Commons of the UK Parliament. It existed from 1832 to 1997. Elections used the first past the post system; when this elects more than one member, it is sometimes called plurality-at-large voting.
Kidderminster was a parliamentary constituency in Worcestershire, represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post voting system.
East Reading is a main locality of the town of Reading in the English county of Berkshire. Its centre is known as Cemetery Junction, after Reading Old Cemetery.
Thames is an electoral ward of the Borough of Reading, in the English county of Berkshire. It includes areas on both sides of both the River Thames and the River Kennet, to the north and east of the centre of Reading on the south bank, and to the east of the centre of Caversham on the north bank. It should not be confused with the ward of the same name that existed prior to the 2022 Reading Borough Council election, with which it has no area in common.
Reading Central is a proposed constituency in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament. It was formed as a result of the 2023 Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies. It subsumes parts of the, soon to be former, Reading West and Reading East constituencies but, unlike them, the whole of the new constituency will be within the Borough of Reading. It will be first contested in the 2024 general election.